Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

J. Sai Deepak Joins The CJP Protest Debate While the government may be factually correct on issues, repeated exam leaks and lack of timely communication have created a negative perception. Social media criticism does not necessarily mean support for violence, but some people may be influenced or misled: Sai...

188,016 просмотров • 2 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Mahua Moitra & J Sai Deepak's Fiery Exchange Over Hindutva & Hinduism “Hindutva Exists Because…” The Debate 2026 by the Calcutta Debating Circle sets the stage for a charged and unfiltered clash on one of India’s most polarising questions: “Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva.” A fiery face-off between TMC MP Mahua Moitra and legal scholar J Sai Deepak as they lock horns over faith, politics, identity, and the future of Indian democracy. Sharp arguments, ideological fault lines, and no easy answers. This is a debate that cuts to the core of contemporary India. Moitra took jibes at her senior Swapan Da, which obviously people found uncalled for and not funny at all. J Sai Deepak, opposing the motion, he argued that Hinduism actually needs protection from secularism, rather than Hindutva. He challenged the narrative that Hindutva began with V.D. Savarkar in 1923. Instead, he traced its roots to 19th-century Bengal (1860s–1909) as an “organic Shakta response” to colonial invasion, citing figures like Bankim Chandra Chatterjee and Sri Aurobindo. He countered claims that Hindutva is “hyper-masculine” or strictly “Brahminical vegetarian,” asserting that Bengali masculinity and Shakta traditions (which include offerings of meat and alcohol) are foundational to Hindutva. J Sai Deepak argued that Hindutva is a civilizational necessity that translates into a political vision, and that it is unconstitutional to deny political representation to Hindutva while allowing it for other ideologies like communism. The event featured sharp rebuttals against co-debaters Mani Shankar Aiyar and Mahua Moitra. He accused Aiyar of conflating Hindutva solely with Savarkar and questioned Moitra on whether she had similar critiques for non-Hindu worldviews. The debate, which also featured Sudhanshu Trivedi and Ashutosh, concluded with the audience overwhelmingly voting against the motion, supporting J Sai Deepak's stance. In no way Moitra could’ve matched J Sai, nowhere near and totally decimated. Credit : ANI.

Augadh

99,876 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The speaker argues that the current student protests over exam paper leaks should not be limited to demanding the resignation of the Education Minister. Instead, he claims the root cause lies with the central government, alleging that institutions such as the Election Commission and the electoral system have been compromised. Key themes include: Criticism of the Prime Minister, the BJP, RSS, and the Union government. Allegations that repeated exam paper leaks reflect systemic governance failures. Calls for a broader political movement rather than a single-issue protest. Strong criticism of EVMs and advocacy for a return to paper ballots. Claims that democratic institutions have been weakened. Criticism of India's foreign policy, particularly regarding the US, Israel, Iran, China, and oil imports. Appeals for youth and citizens to participate in peaceful, sustained democratic movements. The video primarily expresses political opinions and allegations, many of which are disputed or not established as fact. For example: Claims that elections cannot be won unless permitted by the Prime Minister are political assertions, not proven facts. Statements about the Election Commission being completely controlled or elections being predetermined remain matters of political debate rather than judicially established conclusions. References to exam paper leaks are grounded in real incidents, but the attribution of responsibility to specific political actors is the speaker's interpretation. This video is less a news report and more a political speech. It mixes genuine public concerns—such as exam paper leaks, unemployment, and institutional accountability—with strong political accusations and personal opinions. Some criticisms are based on real events, while many broader conclusions are contested and should not be accepted as established facts without independent evidence. A healthy democracy allows criticism of governments, but it also requires citizens to distinguish between verified facts, political opinion, and rhetorical claims.

Ashok Dadhwal

14,831 просмотров • 18 дней назад

"Deepak Kumar, now known as 'Muhammad' Deepak... is a beacon of hope in the struggle against the Hindutva communalism . Deepak Kumar entered the scene in Kotdwar, in the foothills of the Himalayas, when Bajrang Dal activists began harassing an elderly man named Muhammad. This communal rampage took place on Republic Day—a day that should instead radiate the messages of brotherhood, coexistence, and equality. Standing as a savior before the helpless Muhammad, Deepak Kumar single-handedly confronted a mob of nearly 150 predators. Realizing that Deepak, a gym trainer, possessed significant physical strength, the messengers of hate beat a retreat. However, they did not forget to ask his name as they withdrew. The young man did not hesitate for even half a second before responding: 'My name is Muhammad Deepak.' Today, despite being a Hindu, Deepak takes immense pride in having protected a destitute elderly Muslim man. I traveled to Kotdwar today to convey the best wishes of Kerala, a state that prides itself on religious harmony. I met not only Deepak but also his mother, wife, and child. I took hot ginger tea served by his mother, who sells tea for a living. I visited and took a membership at his gym, which now stands deserted due to threats from communal elements. I also visited Muhammad Baba’s textile shop and made some purchases. Furthermore, I registered a strong protest at the Kotdwar Police Station, which has filed a case against Deepak while shielding the rioters. Deepak Kumar, who transformed into 'Muhammad' Deepak, is not merely an individual... he is the diamond-bright light of hope. #MuhammadDeepak

John Brittas

44,921 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад