Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

J. Sai Deepak Joins The CJP Protest Debate While the government may be factually correct on issues, repeated exam leaks and lack of timely communication have created a negative perception. Social media criticism does not necessarily mean support for violence, but some people may be influenced or misled: Sai...

TimesNow's profile picture

TIMES NOW

9,825,256 subscribers

189,804 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

J. Sai Deepak Joins The CJP Protest Debate The situation escalated because protesters gained narrative advantage while the government appeared unprepared. I believe there may have been excesses from both sides, but genuine students should distance themselves from disruptive elements: Sai Deepak J speaks to Pranesh Kumar Roy
4:46

J. Sai Deepak Joins The CJP Protest Debate The situation escalated because protesters gained narrative advantage while the government appeared unprepared. I believe there may have been excesses from both sides, but genuine students should distance themselves from disruptive elements: Sai Deepak J speaks to Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

74,312 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

J. Sai Deepak Joins The CJP Protest Debate Why is the govt not holding a press conference and directly answering questions on this issue? Have we seen even one press conference addressing these concerns so far?: Sai Deepak J speaks to Pranesh Kumar Roy
2:27

J. Sai Deepak Joins The CJP Protest Debate Why is the govt not holding a press conference and directly answering questions on this issue? Have we seen even one press conference addressing these concerns so far?: Sai Deepak J speaks to Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

15,264 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

J. Sai Deepak Joins The CJP Protest Debate If the govt wants to engage, it should reach out directly. Many questions remain unanswered, and the govt needs to be more transparent and forthcoming instead of relying on indirect statements: Sai Deepak J speaks to Pranesh Kumar Roy
1:32

J. Sai Deepak Joins The CJP Protest Debate If the govt wants to engage, it should reach out directly. Many questions remain unanswered, and the govt needs to be more transparent and forthcoming instead of relying on indirect statements: Sai Deepak J speaks to Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

40,100 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

J. Sai Deepak Joins The CJP Protest Debate Who said that a Bangladesh or a Nepal situation can't happen in India? It is always possible. All ingredients are there... I would be extra vigilant compared to Bangladesh or Nepal...: Sai Deepak J speaks to Pranesh Kumar Roy
7:10

J. Sai Deepak Joins The CJP Protest Debate Who said that a Bangladesh or a Nepal situation can't happen in India? It is always possible. All ingredients are there... I would be extra vigilant compared to Bangladesh or Nepal...: Sai Deepak J speaks to Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

111,930 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Partition will be repeated – J. Sai Deepak’s stark warning J. Sai Deepak warns that India has moved beyond the age of feel-good speeches it’s time to confront harsh realities. Drawing parallels between the 1920s and today, he says the same patterns of separatism, appeasement, and communal tension are re-emerging. He cautions that electoral victories mean nothing if society remains unprepared for ground-level threats. Ignoring history, he says, could push India toward Partition-like violence again within 20–25 years. Message: Wake up. Organize. Defend. Before history repeats itself. Sai Deepak J
0:44

Partition will be repeated – J. Sai Deepak’s stark warning J. Sai Deepak warns that India has moved beyond the age of feel-good speeches it’s time to confront harsh realities. Drawing parallels between the 1920s and today, he says the same patterns of separatism, appeasement, and communal tension are re-emerging. He cautions that electoral victories mean nothing if society remains unprepared for ground-level threats. Ignoring history, he says, could push India toward Partition-like violence again within 20–25 years. Message: Wake up. Organize. Defend. Before history repeats itself. Sai Deepak J

Comman Man

28,748 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

CJP Protest Under Article 75 of the Constitution, it is only PM Modi who can decide whether the Education Minister will resign or not: Sanju Verma I do not want the government that I elected to be threatened by social media buffoons on a stage they have illegally occupied: Tushar Gupta tells Pranesh Kumar Roy
6:46

CJP Protest Under Article 75 of the Constitution, it is only PM Modi who can decide whether the Education Minister will resign or not: Sanju Verma I do not want the government that I elected to be threatened by social media buffoons on a stage they have illegally occupied: Tushar Gupta tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

47,753 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

#TheRightstand | If we don't separate the issue from the protesters, we won't solve the problem. There are genuine concerns that need to be addressed. We can either indulge in whataboutery or take accountability and make a clean break from the past says Sai Deepak J, SR ADV & Author Anand Narasimhan🇮🇳 | #Government #India #CJP
7:08

#TheRightstand | If we don't separate the issue from the protesters, we won't solve the problem. There are genuine concerns that need to be addressed. We can either indulge in whataboutery or take accountability and make a clean break from the past says Sai Deepak J, SR ADV & Author Anand Narasimhan🇮🇳 | #Government #India #CJP

News18

19,132 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

#TheRightstand | Jana Gana Mana and Vande Mataram were written by different people, and I believe both have a civilisational place in our national consciousness. But neither position can claim to be secular in every sense. Instead of debating a Vande Mataram Bill, we should focus on the real issues in education and clearly define what constitutes disrespect says Sai Deepak J, SR ADV & Author Anand Narasimhan🇮🇳 | #Government #India #VandeMataram
3:19

#TheRightstand | Jana Gana Mana and Vande Mataram were written by different people, and I believe both have a civilisational place in our national consciousness. But neither position can claim to be secular in every sense. Instead of debating a Vande Mataram Bill, we should focus on the real issues in education and clearly define what constitutes disrespect says Sai Deepak J, SR ADV & Author Anand Narasimhan🇮🇳 | #Government #India #VandeMataram

News18

24,528 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

#TheRightstand | There needs to be active public outrage, person to person. When it comes to FCRA, I don't believe we have done enough. I believe Marco Rubio's visit to Bharat has something to do with this. At some point, the government needs to take a clear position and communicate it transparently says Sai Deepak J, SR ADV & Author Anand Narasimhan🇮🇳 | #Government #India #CJP #FRCA
5:46

#TheRightstand | There needs to be active public outrage, person to person. When it comes to FCRA, I don't believe we have done enough. I believe Marco Rubio's visit to Bharat has something to do with this. At some point, the government needs to take a clear position and communicate it transparently says Sai Deepak J, SR ADV & Author Anand Narasimhan🇮🇳 | #Government #India #CJP #FRCA

News18

38,995 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

#TheRightstand | I 100% agree that there are outsider elements forces trying to incite anarchy in Bharat, with funded entities attempting to topple elected governments. But when you address the real problem, society will stand with you. People from all walks of life have come out in support. I am clear about the forces that control these puppets says Sai Deepak J, SR ADV & Author Anand Narasimhan🇮🇳 | #Government #India #CJP
3:13

#TheRightstand | I 100% agree that there are outsider elements forces trying to incite anarchy in Bharat, with funded entities attempting to topple elected governments. But when you address the real problem, society will stand with you. People from all walks of life have come out in support. I am clear about the forces that control these puppets says Sai Deepak J, SR ADV & Author Anand Narasimhan🇮🇳 | #Government #India #CJP

News18

41,130 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

It's apparent that when faced with the reality of the team which was gathered to defeat the 'stacked' motion, Sai Deepak J ji, Manu Khajuria ji and myself, the UK in Pakistan 🇬🇧🇵🇰 team, sought to 'fix' an outcome without debate. But times have changed, falsehood even at the level of BBC , cannot be concealed. Here's a sample of what the Oxford Union did NOT want presented. Randhir Jaiswal Uday Mahurkar
12:18

It's apparent that when faced with the reality of the team which was gathered to defeat the 'stacked' motion, Sai Deepak J ji, Manu Khajuria ji and myself, the UK in Pakistan 🇬🇧🇵🇰 team, sought to 'fix' an outcome without debate. But times have changed, falsehood even at the level of BBC , cannot be concealed. Here's a sample of what the Oxford Union did NOT want presented. Randhir Jaiswal Uday Mahurkar

Pt. Satish K Sharma MBCS FRSA FRAS

77,938 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Mahua Moitra & J Sai Deepak's Fiery Exchange Over Hindutva & Hinduism “Hindutva Exists Because…” The Debate 2026 by the Calcutta Debating Circle sets the stage for a charged and unfiltered clash on one of India’s most polarising questions: “Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva.” A fiery face-off between TMC MP Mahua Moitra and legal scholar J Sai Deepak as they lock horns over faith, politics, identity, and the future of Indian democracy. Sharp arguments, ideological fault lines, and no easy answers. This is a debate that cuts to the core of contemporary India. Moitra took jibes at her senior Swapan Da, which obviously people found uncalled for and not funny at all. J Sai Deepak, opposing the motion, he argued that Hinduism actually needs protection from secularism, rather than Hindutva. He challenged the narrative that Hindutva began with V.D. Savarkar in 1923. Instead, he traced its roots to 19th-century Bengal (1860s–1909) as an “organic Shakta response” to colonial invasion, citing figures like Bankim Chandra Chatterjee and Sri Aurobindo. He countered claims that Hindutva is “hyper-masculine” or strictly “Brahminical vegetarian,” asserting that Bengali masculinity and Shakta traditions (which include offerings of meat and alcohol) are foundational to Hindutva. J Sai Deepak argued that Hindutva is a civilizational necessity that translates into a political vision, and that it is unconstitutional to deny political representation to Hindutva while allowing it for other ideologies like communism. The event featured sharp rebuttals against co-debaters Mani Shankar Aiyar and Mahua Moitra. He accused Aiyar of conflating Hindutva solely with Savarkar and questioned Moitra on whether she had similar critiques for non-Hindu worldviews. The debate, which also featured Sudhanshu Trivedi and Ashutosh, concluded with the audience overwhelmingly voting against the motion, supporting J Sai Deepak's stance. In no way Moitra could’ve matched J Sai, nowhere near and totally decimated. Credit : ANI.
11:21

Mahua Moitra & J Sai Deepak's Fiery Exchange Over Hindutva & Hinduism “Hindutva Exists Because…” The Debate 2026 by the Calcutta Debating Circle sets the stage for a charged and unfiltered clash on one of India’s most polarising questions: “Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva.” A fiery face-off between TMC MP Mahua Moitra and legal scholar J Sai Deepak as they lock horns over faith, politics, identity, and the future of Indian democracy. Sharp arguments, ideological fault lines, and no easy answers. This is a debate that cuts to the core of contemporary India. Moitra took jibes at her senior Swapan Da, which obviously people found uncalled for and not funny at all. J Sai Deepak, opposing the motion, he argued that Hinduism actually needs protection from secularism, rather than Hindutva. He challenged the narrative that Hindutva began with V.D. Savarkar in 1923. Instead, he traced its roots to 19th-century Bengal (1860s–1909) as an “organic Shakta response” to colonial invasion, citing figures like Bankim Chandra Chatterjee and Sri Aurobindo. He countered claims that Hindutva is “hyper-masculine” or strictly “Brahminical vegetarian,” asserting that Bengali masculinity and Shakta traditions (which include offerings of meat and alcohol) are foundational to Hindutva. J Sai Deepak argued that Hindutva is a civilizational necessity that translates into a political vision, and that it is unconstitutional to deny political representation to Hindutva while allowing it for other ideologies like communism. The event featured sharp rebuttals against co-debaters Mani Shankar Aiyar and Mahua Moitra. He accused Aiyar of conflating Hindutva solely with Savarkar and questioned Moitra on whether she had similar critiques for non-Hindu worldviews. The debate, which also featured Sudhanshu Trivedi and Ashutosh, concluded with the audience overwhelmingly voting against the motion, supporting J Sai Deepak's stance. In no way Moitra could’ve matched J Sai, nowhere near and totally decimated. Credit : ANI.

Augadh

100,347 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

NSA Ajit Doval saab on information warfare and social media narrative control: 📍 Be the first respondents on social media. The trash narrative comes within 4 hours, dominate it with truth. 📍 We don't have a lack of PATRIOTS. We need to counter social media through social media itself. ​Some people ask if the govt should make laws for this. While there are laws for threats to life and security, simply suppressing voices on social media can often have a more negative effect. It is better to engage and let the truth counter the falsehoods through the people themselves.
2:07

NSA Ajit Doval saab on information warfare and social media narrative control: 📍 Be the first respondents on social media. The trash narrative comes within 4 hours, dominate it with truth. 📍 We don't have a lack of PATRIOTS. We need to counter social media through social media itself. ​Some people ask if the govt should make laws for this. While there are laws for threats to life and security, simply suppressing voices on social media can often have a more negative effect. It is better to engage and let the truth counter the falsehoods through the people themselves.

OsintTV 📺

55,705 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

❗️Zelenskyy: I simply don’t have time for coffee, for tea, for 300 blogs. There just won’t be any light. Openness is not measured by the number of cameras or photos, the president emphasized. In the modern world, trust often depends on presence in social networks — if you don’t engage in your own communication, people may perceive it as being closed off. The president does not become more or less open depending on the number of posts on social media. Communication with civil society does take place, but it is physically impossible to devote time to everyone, Zelenskyy said.
1:49

❗️Zelenskyy: I simply don’t have time for coffee, for tea, for 300 blogs. There just won’t be any light. Openness is not measured by the number of cameras or photos, the president emphasized. In the modern world, trust often depends on presence in social networks — if you don’t engage in your own communication, people may perceive it as being closed off. The president does not become more or less open depending on the number of posts on social media. Communication with civil society does take place, but it is physically impossible to devote time to everyone, Zelenskyy said.

🪖MilitaryNewsUA🇺🇦

23,267 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨With the evidence presented could Tyler Robinson be a patsy? A lot of people keep asking if Tyler Robinson could still be a "patsy." That depends on what you mean. If you mean he had nothing to do with the crime, that's a different question than whether someone may have influenced or manipulated him. The hearing right now isn't about motive or who may have influenced him, it's about whether the evidence shows he pulled the trigger. Those are two separate issues.
1:11

🚨With the evidence presented could Tyler Robinson be a patsy? A lot of people keep asking if Tyler Robinson could still be a "patsy." That depends on what you mean. If you mean he had nothing to do with the crime, that's a different question than whether someone may have influenced or manipulated him. The hearing right now isn't about motive or who may have influenced him, it's about whether the evidence shows he pulled the trigger. Those are two separate issues.

Brandon Tatum

51,034 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

DMK is raising public issues against TVK government, but its impact is diluted by the distasteful language of some leaders on stage and the abusive discourse of their ecosystem on social media. Even people who find issues against TVK govt may not vote for DMK because of this. On GoalTalk with T.N. Raghu
2:20

DMK is raising public issues against TVK government, but its impact is diluted by the distasteful language of some leaders on stage and the abusive discourse of their ecosystem on social media. Even people who find issues against TVK govt may not vote for DMK because of this. On GoalTalk with T.N. Raghu

Siddharth Prabhakar

15,956 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

Hindus didn’t lose history because of lack of strength — they lost it by forgetting unity. ⚔️ Advocate J. Sai Deepak exposes a painful pattern: self-doubt, internal demonization, and rejection of our own civilizational roots — repeated again and again through centuries. From glorifying invaders to mocking traditions, from intellectual colonization to cultural amnesia — the biggest damage was not done by outsiders, but enabled from within. Until history is understood, not apologized for, the cycle will continue. This isn’t hate. This is self-introspection. And truth always hurts before it heals.
1:18

Hindus didn’t lose history because of lack of strength — they lost it by forgetting unity. ⚔️ Advocate J. Sai Deepak exposes a painful pattern: self-doubt, internal demonization, and rejection of our own civilizational roots — repeated again and again through centuries. From glorifying invaders to mocking traditions, from intellectual colonization to cultural amnesia — the biggest damage was not done by outsiders, but enabled from within. Until history is understood, not apologized for, the cycle will continue. This isn’t hate. This is self-introspection. And truth always hurts before it heals.

श्री

20,227 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The speaker argues that the current student protests over exam paper leaks should not be limited to demanding the resignation of the Education Minister. Instead, he claims the root cause lies with the central government, alleging that institutions such as the Election Commission and the electoral system have been compromised. Key themes include: Criticism of the Prime Minister, the BJP, RSS, and the Union government. Allegations that repeated exam paper leaks reflect systemic governance failures. Calls for a broader political movement rather than a single-issue protest. Strong criticism of EVMs and advocacy for a return to paper ballots. Claims that democratic institutions have been weakened. Criticism of India's foreign policy, particularly regarding the US, Israel, Iran, China, and oil imports. Appeals for youth and citizens to participate in peaceful, sustained democratic movements. The video primarily expresses political opinions and allegations, many of which are disputed or not established as fact. For example: Claims that elections cannot be won unless permitted by the Prime Minister are political assertions, not proven facts. Statements about the Election Commission being completely controlled or elections being predetermined remain matters of political debate rather than judicially established conclusions. References to exam paper leaks are grounded in real incidents, but the attribution of responsibility to specific political actors is the speaker's interpretation. This video is less a news report and more a political speech. It mixes genuine public concerns—such as exam paper leaks, unemployment, and institutional accountability—with strong political accusations and personal opinions. Some criticisms are based on real events, while many broader conclusions are contested and should not be accepted as established facts without independent evidence. A healthy democracy allows criticism of governments, but it also requires citizens to distinguish between verified facts, political opinion, and rhetorical claims.
14:02

The speaker argues that the current student protests over exam paper leaks should not be limited to demanding the resignation of the Education Minister. Instead, he claims the root cause lies with the central government, alleging that institutions such as the Election Commission and the electoral system have been compromised. Key themes include: Criticism of the Prime Minister, the BJP, RSS, and the Union government. Allegations that repeated exam paper leaks reflect systemic governance failures. Calls for a broader political movement rather than a single-issue protest. Strong criticism of EVMs and advocacy for a return to paper ballots. Claims that democratic institutions have been weakened. Criticism of India's foreign policy, particularly regarding the US, Israel, Iran, China, and oil imports. Appeals for youth and citizens to participate in peaceful, sustained democratic movements. The video primarily expresses political opinions and allegations, many of which are disputed or not established as fact. For example: Claims that elections cannot be won unless permitted by the Prime Minister are political assertions, not proven facts. Statements about the Election Commission being completely controlled or elections being predetermined remain matters of political debate rather than judicially established conclusions. References to exam paper leaks are grounded in real incidents, but the attribution of responsibility to specific political actors is the speaker's interpretation. This video is less a news report and more a political speech. It mixes genuine public concerns—such as exam paper leaks, unemployment, and institutional accountability—with strong political accusations and personal opinions. Some criticisms are based on real events, while many broader conclusions are contested and should not be accepted as established facts without independent evidence. A healthy democracy allows criticism of governments, but it also requires citizens to distinguish between verified facts, political opinion, and rhetorical claims.

Ashok Dadhwal

14,868 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇺🇸 America may be divided, but the civil war comparison may be going too far. Legal commentator Robert Barnes points to the political violence of the 1890s, 1930s, and 1960s, arguing today’s unrest has not reached the scale of past labor rebellions or domestic terror movements. He says social media has made polarization worse by trapping people in isolated bubbles, but the deeper danger is economic. Robert Barnes
3:07

🇺🇸 America may be divided, but the civil war comparison may be going too far. Legal commentator Robert Barnes points to the political violence of the 1890s, 1930s, and 1960s, arguing today’s unrest has not reached the scale of past labor rebellions or domestic terror movements. He says social media has made polarization worse by trapping people in isolated bubbles, but the deeper danger is economic. Robert Barnes

Mario Nawfal

25,848 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce