Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🇺🇲 Jack Smith: "Our investigation developed PROOF beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election & to prevent the lawful transfer of power. Our investigation also developed powerful evidence that..."

True Blue 🇦🇺🐨

36,526 subscribers

120,422 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity." –Jack Smith testifying before Congress.

"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity." –Jack Smith testifying before Congress.

Pod Save America

20,181 views • 6 months ago

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”

Republicans against Trump

185,834 views • 7 months ago

JACK SMITH: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election, prevent the peaceful transfer of power, retained classified docs, obstructed justice… I’d charge an ex president again regardless of party.”

JACK SMITH: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election, prevent the peaceful transfer of power, retained classified docs, obstructed justice… I’d charge an ex president again regardless of party.”

The Tennessee Holler

234,015 views • 7 months ago

This is why the House GOP refused Jack Smith's request that he be allowed to testify in public: Smith said he had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election and prevent the transfer of power. Also, he'd charge him again.

This is why the House GOP refused Jack Smith's request that he be allowed to testify in public: Smith said he had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election and prevent the transfer of power. Also, he'd charge him again.

Bill Madden

25,462 views • 7 months ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

Former special counsel Jack Smith: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

Republicans against Trump

78,167 views • 6 months ago

.Rep. Jamie Raskin to Jack Smith: "Everybody here knows what you did wrong in Donald Trump's eyes and why he says you belong in prison...You found proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election."

.Rep. Jamie Raskin to Jack Smith: "Everybody here knows what you did wrong in Donald Trump's eyes and why he says you belong in prison...You found proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election."

CSPAN

208,390 views • 6 months ago

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.

FactPost

13,087 views • 6 months ago

BREAKING: Super powerful words from Jack Smith just now: "The investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity… No one should be above the law in this country and the law required he be held to account.” Every American needs to hear this

BREAKING: Super powerful words from Jack Smith just now: "The investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity… No one should be above the law in this country and the law required he be held to account.” Every American needs to hear this

Brian Krassenstein

513,353 views • 6 months ago

Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican.

Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican.

Acyn

85,083 views • 6 months ago

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

The Bulwark

46,147 views • 6 months ago

HANK JOHNSON: Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false? JACK SMITH: Yes JOHNSON: And did your investigation uncover sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump publicly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him while he privately acknowledged he lost? SMITH: Yes. We cited instances of that JOHNSON: Yet, here we see on the 5th anniversary of the insurrection, the Trump White House propaganda machine is still promoting the stolen election theory on a government webpage

HANK JOHNSON: Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false? JACK SMITH: Yes JOHNSON: And did your investigation uncover sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump publicly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him while he privately acknowledged he lost? SMITH: Yes. We cited instances of that JOHNSON: Yet, here we see on the 5th anniversary of the insurrection, the Trump White House propaganda machine is still promoting the stolen election theory on a government webpage

Aaron Rupar

316,735 views • 6 months ago

🚨HAPPENING NOW 🚨 Jack Smith says President Trump “engaged in a criminal scheme to over turn” the 2020 election.

🚨HAPPENING NOW 🚨 Jack Smith says President Trump “engaged in a criminal scheme to over turn” the 2020 election.

Breanna Morello

22,135 views • 6 months ago

Johnson: “Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false?” Smith: “Yes it did”

Johnson: “Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false?” Smith: “Yes it did”

The Bulwark

22,349 views • 6 months ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

PBS News

13,485 views • 6 months ago

Smith: For nearly three decades I have been a career prosecutor. I have served during both Republican and Democratic administrations and I've been guided by those principles in every role I've held. I continued to honor those principles when I was appointed to serve as special counsel in November of 2022. The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power. Our investigation also developed powerful evidence that showed that President Trump willfully retained highly classified documents after he left office in January of 2021, storing them at his social club, including in a ballroom and a bathroom. He then repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents. I remain grateful for the counsel, judgment, and advice of my team as I executed my responsibilities. I am both saddened and angered that President Trump has sought revenge against career prosecutors, FBI agents, and support staff simply for doing their jobs and for having worked on those cases. These dedicated public servants are the best of us, and they have been wrongly vilified and improperly dismissed from their jobs. I made my decisions in the investigation without regard to President Trump's political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 Presidential election. We took our actions based on the facts and the law, the very lessons I learned early in my career as a prosecutor. We followed Justice Department policies and observed legal requirements. The timing and speed of our work reflects the strength of the evidence and our confidence that we would have secured convictions at trial. If asked whether to prosecute a former President based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat.

Smith: For nearly three decades I have been a career prosecutor. I have served during both Republican and Democratic administrations and I've been guided by those principles in every role I've held. I continued to honor those principles when I was appointed to serve as special counsel in November of 2022. The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power. Our investigation also developed powerful evidence that showed that President Trump willfully retained highly classified documents after he left office in January of 2021, storing them at his social club, including in a ballroom and a bathroom. He then repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents. I remain grateful for the counsel, judgment, and advice of my team as I executed my responsibilities. I am both saddened and angered that President Trump has sought revenge against career prosecutors, FBI agents, and support staff simply for doing their jobs and for having worked on those cases. These dedicated public servants are the best of us, and they have been wrongly vilified and improperly dismissed from their jobs. I made my decisions in the investigation without regard to President Trump's political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 Presidential election. We took our actions based on the facts and the law, the very lessons I learned early in my career as a prosecutor. We followed Justice Department policies and observed legal requirements. The timing and speed of our work reflects the strength of the evidence and our confidence that we would have secured convictions at trial. If asked whether to prosecute a former President based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat.

Acyn

213,321 views • 7 months ago

Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing the investigation, filed charges against Donald Trump in connection with his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Follow our live updates here.

Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing the investigation, filed charges against Donald Trump in connection with his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Follow our live updates here.

The New York Times

584,861 views • 3 years ago

Former US Special Counsel Jack Smith confronted Republican criticism of his investigation and told a House panel that President Donald Trump sought ways to remain in power after losing the 2020 election

Former US Special Counsel Jack Smith confronted Republican criticism of his investigation and told a House panel that President Donald Trump sought ways to remain in power after losing the 2020 election

Reuters

29,003 views • 6 months ago

Today, Jack Smith explained he had enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump tried to overturn the election illegally, tried to get fake electors, and in a separate case, stole classified documents and tried to hide them.

Today, Jack Smith explained he had enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump tried to overturn the election illegally, tried to get fake electors, and in a separate case, stole classified documents and tried to hide them.

Rep. Ted Lieu

24,281 views • 6 months ago

Special Counsel Jack Smith said former president Donald Trump tried to obstruct “a bedrock function of the U.S. government” — the certification of the presidential election results. Smith said the Department of Justice is committed to a speedy trial, and that the investigation of other individuals in the case continues.

Special Counsel Jack Smith said former president Donald Trump tried to obstruct “a bedrock function of the U.S. government” — the certification of the presidential election results. Smith said the Department of Justice is committed to a speedy trial, and that the investigation of other individuals in the case continues.

The Washington Post

1,391,713 views • 3 years ago