Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Jack Smith: Those records corroborated evidence that we had that President Trump and his co-conspirators were seeking to exploit the violence on January 6th in furtherance of their criminal scheme. They were taking the fact that law enforcement officers had been brutally assaulted at this institution and using that... show more

Headquarters

1,158,843 subscribers

61,224 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

12 Kommentare

Profilbild von Claire S 🤍

Claire S 🤍vor 2 Tagen

THIS....the most powerful statement and testimony yet from Jack Smith. trump and his gang would've all been in jail right now had Jack Smith been allowed to continue. Jack Smith *must* be US AG in 2029.

Profilbild von forestfromtrees

forestfromtreesvor 2 Tagen

Let's remind voters Trump tried to overthrow the government and stole top secret documents one month and four days before an election! Way to go, boys!

Profilbild von Capital Matrix | Market Intelligence 📊

Capital Matrix | Market Intelligence 📊vor 2 Tagen

Establishing criminal intent is the ultimate hurdle in high-profile cases like this. Smith pointing directly to using the delay as a tool shows exactly where the prosecution's roadmap is focused.

Profilbild von MiMi ♥️🇺🇸

MiMi ♥️🇺🇸vor 2 Tagen

Liar

Profilbild von Garbage Conservative

Garbage Conservativevor 2 Tagen

🤣🤣🤣

Profilbild von America is worth saving

America is worth savingvor 2 Tagen

Nobody believes this partisan hack.

Profilbild von Jamie C Rodriguez

Jamie C Rodriguezvor 2 Tagen

@AntiToxicPeople An attempted coup d’ etat perpetuated by the outgoing president of the United States of America, Donald Trump.

Profilbild von Piztol

Piztolvor 2 Tagen

And what evidence is that? Is it the video of paid protesters admitting they were from the left & dressed in MAGA gear. Or Pelosi saying it was her responsibility & her fault for declining the offered “extra security”?Or the video of Capitol police walking paid ppl out the back?

Profilbild von NAC

NACvor 2 Tagen

Many of the people posting on this thread are paid by the DNC, many of these posts are lies.

Profilbild von ColdHardFacts

ColdHardFactsvor 2 Tagen

Jack Smith is such a disgrace and a liar

Profilbild von Scott Dog

Scott Dogvor 2 Tagen

Hack Smith is a stone cold sociopath who BASTARDIZED our legal system in a depraved & malicious attempt to deprive MILLIONS OF AMERICANS of the right to free & fair elections, but it backfired SPECTACULARLY & catapulted Trump to a historic second term. Nice work, Asshole❗️🤣

Profilbild von MiMi ♥️🇺🇸

MiMi ♥️🇺🇸vor 2 Tagen

Liar

Ähnliche Videos

Goldman: I just want to take a minute and allow you to explain why you requested the toll records of those officials for January 6th. Smith: Well, with regard to the toll records that were subpoenaed regarding the period of the fourth, I think it was to the seventh, we had evidence that the president had directed Rudy Giuliani, one of his coconspirators, to contact members of congress to try to further delay the proceedings and exploit the violence that happened in the capitol. We had evidence that those calls had happened. We wanted to get more evidence of that, to corroborate it for trial. That is, again, as I mentioned earlier today, a standard part of an investigation to understand who a conspiracy is trying to reach out to, how they're trying to influence people.

Goldman: I just want to take a minute and allow you to explain why you requested the toll records of those officials for January 6th. Smith: Well, with regard to the toll records that were subpoenaed regarding the period of the fourth, I think it was to the seventh, we had evidence that the president had directed Rudy Giuliani, one of his coconspirators, to contact members of congress to try to further delay the proceedings and exploit the violence that happened in the capitol. We had evidence that those calls had happened. We wanted to get more evidence of that, to corroborate it for trial. That is, again, as I mentioned earlier today, a standard part of an investigation to understand who a conspiracy is trying to reach out to, how they're trying to influence people.

Acyn

365,273 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Phang: If Republican senators and congressmen have an issue with their cell records being obtained by Jack Smith, they should take it up with Trump. Because Trump himself ordered his co-conspirators, and Donald Trump himself made phone calls to delay and to make sure that those election results were not certified on January 6th. Why? To further the conspiracy to achieve the end goal of him staying in office. End of story.

Phang: If Republican senators and congressmen have an issue with their cell records being obtained by Jack Smith, they should take it up with Trump. Because Trump himself ordered his co-conspirators, and Donald Trump himself made phone calls to delay and to make sure that those election results were not certified on January 6th. Why? To further the conspiracy to achieve the end goal of him staying in office. End of story.

Acyn

205,480 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Smith: "Our assessment of the evidence is that [Trump] is the person most responsible for what happened on January 6th. He caused what happened. It was foreseeable to him and then when it happened he tried to exploit in furtherance of the conspiracy."

Smith: "Our assessment of the evidence is that [Trump] is the person most responsible for what happened on January 6th. He caused what happened. It was foreseeable to him and then when it happened he tried to exploit in furtherance of the conspiracy."

The Bulwark

23,990 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Question: To the extent members of Congress and senators are up in arms that this happened to them and are seeking accountability, who should be held accountable? Smith: I think who should be accountable for this is Donald Trump. These records exist because, in the case of the senators, Donald Trump directed his co-conspirators to call these people to further delay the proceedings. He chose to do that. If Donald Trump had chosen to call a number of Democratic senators, we would have gotten toll records for Democratic senators. So the responsibility for why these records were collected lies with Donald Trump.

Question: To the extent members of Congress and senators are up in arms that this happened to them and are seeking accountability, who should be held accountable? Smith: I think who should be accountable for this is Donald Trump. These records exist because, in the case of the senators, Donald Trump directed his co-conspirators to call these people to further delay the proceedings. He chose to do that. If Donald Trump had chosen to call a number of Democratic senators, we would have gotten toll records for Democratic senators. So the responsibility for why these records were collected lies with Donald Trump.

Acyn

135,217 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

BREAKING: HEGSETH SAYS IRAN WANTED TO KlLL TRUMP: “We've known for a long time that Iran had intentions of trying to kill Trump and other U.S. officials. While that was not the focus of the effort in fact, it was never raised by the President I ensured, and others ensured, that those who were responsible for that were eventually part of the target list.”

BREAKING: HEGSETH SAYS IRAN WANTED TO KlLL TRUMP: “We've known for a long time that Iran had intentions of trying to kill Trump and other U.S. officials. While that was not the focus of the effort in fact, it was never raised by the President I ensured, and others ensured, that those who were responsible for that were eventually part of the target list.”

Sulaiman Ahmed

67,456 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

WATCH: @Sec_Noem to the House Committee on Homeland Security: "There were members of this very committee that took part in an action at Delaney Hall on May 9th that need to be addressed... what happened on May 9th was not oversight. It was a political stunt that put the safety of our law enforcement officers, our agents, our staff and our detainees at risk."

WATCH: @Sec_Noem to the House Committee on Homeland Security: "There were members of this very committee that took part in an action at Delaney Hall on May 9th that need to be addressed... what happened on May 9th was not oversight. It was a political stunt that put the safety of our law enforcement officers, our agents, our staff and our detainees at risk."

Rapid Response 47

202,721 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The most important question from Jack Smith's Congressional Testimony: Congresswoman Roth : Do you believe that Donald Trump motivated and was responsible for the violence that occurred on that day even if he didn't walk with them to the Capitol?" Smith: Yes, as we stated in our report, the results of our investigation following the facts and the following the law was that he was the person most responsible for what happened at the Capitol and he caused what would happen at the Capitol and that it was foreseeable to him "

The most important question from Jack Smith's Congressional Testimony: Congresswoman Roth : Do you believe that Donald Trump motivated and was responsible for the violence that occurred on that day even if he didn't walk with them to the Capitol?" Smith: Yes, as we stated in our report, the results of our investigation following the facts and the following the law was that he was the person most responsible for what happened at the Capitol and he caused what would happen at the Capitol and that it was foreseeable to him "

Jeff Storobinsky

112,340 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

.Tricia McLaughlin on the attack on ICE in Dallas: "The evidence points to the fact that this individual very much hated our law enforcement. He was very radicalized... We've seen a lot of this — the great demonization and hatred of our law enforcement."

.Tricia McLaughlin on the attack on ICE in Dallas: "The evidence points to the fact that this individual very much hated our law enforcement. He was very radicalized... We've seen a lot of this — the great demonization and hatred of our law enforcement."

Rapid Response 47

67,204 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Tricia McLaughlin warns that law enforcement is facing unprecedented violence, saying officers are being ambushed, rammed, and assaulted as they work to remove the most dangerous criminals from America’s streets: “Last night, we saw a federal law enforcement officer—he was attacked, he was ambushed. Three individuals were striking him, beating him mercilessly with shovels and sticks. He’s out of the hospital now, but he was really banged up. We’re seeing that our law enforcement officers are being spit on; vehicles are continuing to be rammed into our law enforcement. A 3,200% increase in those vehicle rammings. Just in the last five weeks alone, we’ve arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the street. That includes child rapists, murderers, an individual who is a perpetrator of human slavery, and an individual who killed his own three-month-old child. That is who our law enforcement is risking their lives to get off of America’s streets.”

Tricia McLaughlin warns that law enforcement is facing unprecedented violence, saying officers are being ambushed, rammed, and assaulted as they work to remove the most dangerous criminals from America’s streets: “Last night, we saw a federal law enforcement officer—he was attacked, he was ambushed. Three individuals were striking him, beating him mercilessly with shovels and sticks. He’s out of the hospital now, but he was really banged up. We’re seeing that our law enforcement officers are being spit on; vehicles are continuing to be rammed into our law enforcement. A 3,200% increase in those vehicle rammings. Just in the last five weeks alone, we’ve arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the street. That includes child rapists, murderers, an individual who is a perpetrator of human slavery, and an individual who killed his own three-month-old child. That is who our law enforcement is risking their lives to get off of America’s streets.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

83,956 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Smith: In fact, my recollection is that we had a text thread between Bannon and Epshteyn that covered much of this period. On that text thread, I believe on the evening of January 6th, right around the time the senators’ calls were occurring at the president’s direction, there was an exchange between the two where Epshteyn asked Bannon if he was in touch with him. The answer was affirmative, and it was something to the effect of, “He’s still on fire.”

Smith: In fact, my recollection is that we had a text thread between Bannon and Epshteyn that covered much of this period. On that text thread, I believe on the evening of January 6th, right around the time the senators’ calls were occurring at the president’s direction, there was an exchange between the two where Epshteyn asked Bannon if he was in touch with him. The answer was affirmative, and it was something to the effect of, “He’s still on fire.”

Acyn

145,938 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Jack Smith breaks silence, reveals he had "tons of evidence" in the criminal case against Trump that Aileen Cannon dismissed: “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts. In my particular case, we had tons of evidence of willfulness and obstructive evidence: publicly saying ‘these are my documents’ or things like that, and ‘I can keep them,’” Smith said. “The government even tried to get them back before there was a criminal investigation, and then after the investigation started, [Trump] still [refused] to give them back, and then [tried] to obstruct the investigation. That sort of evidence didn’t exist in the other case.” Smith did not investigate Biden’s classified documents case, but explained that there was no "willful retention of national defense information,” on Biden’s part or obstruction of the federal government’s attempts to retrieve documents for which Trump was indicted. “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts,” Smith said. “The rule of law allows for different outcomes when the facts are different. One of the major differences between the two cases is the obstructive conduct in the case that I investigated.”

Jack Smith breaks silence, reveals he had "tons of evidence" in the criminal case against Trump that Aileen Cannon dismissed: “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts. In my particular case, we had tons of evidence of willfulness and obstructive evidence: publicly saying ‘these are my documents’ or things like that, and ‘I can keep them,’” Smith said. “The government even tried to get them back before there was a criminal investigation, and then after the investigation started, [Trump] still [refused] to give them back, and then [tried] to obstruct the investigation. That sort of evidence didn’t exist in the other case.” Smith did not investigate Biden’s classified documents case, but explained that there was no "willful retention of national defense information,” on Biden’s part or obstruction of the federal government’s attempts to retrieve documents for which Trump was indicted. “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts,” Smith said. “The rule of law allows for different outcomes when the facts are different. One of the major differences between the two cases is the obstructive conduct in the case that I investigated.”

Bryan Dawson🇺🇸

621,662 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

The Bulwark

46,147 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

SEC. KRISTI NOEM: "Let's remember the events that surrounded what happened yesterday on that tragic situation." "These individuals had followed our officers all day, had harassed them, had blocked them in. They were impeding our law enforcement operations, which is against the law. And when they demanded and commanded her to get out of her vehicle several times, she did not." "This was an act of domestic terrorism."

SEC. KRISTI NOEM: "Let's remember the events that surrounded what happened yesterday on that tragic situation." "These individuals had followed our officers all day, had harassed them, had blocked them in. They were impeding our law enforcement operations, which is against the law. And when they demanded and commanded her to get out of her vehicle several times, she did not." "This was an act of domestic terrorism."

Fox News

55,267 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

What I saw was an ICE vehicle attempting to leave an area that was in a near riot condition, a civilian vehicle then suddenly moved in front of it to block its departure. I then saw an ICE officer approach that vehicle and issue a lawful order to the driver to get out of the car. Instead of complying with that order, the driver backed up, pointed the car in the direction of another officer, and then shifted into drive, stepping on the gas while an officer had his hand on the door then accelerated in the direction of the other ICE officer at the moment he fired into the vehicle. That’s what the video shows, and we all have eyes and we all can see it. There are a lot of questions that it raises, starting with the perspective of the officer who fired at this approaching vehicle. Was the car indeed pointed directly at him when he fired? It certainly appeared that way to me from the video we’ve seen. I assume the officer was wearing a body camera and we’ll get a better idea of his perspective in the course of the investigation. There’s the question of why the driver attempted to block the ICE vehicle as it was leaving, why the driver felt motivated to obstruct clearly uniformed federal law enforcement officers in the performance of their duties, why she willfully refused to comply with a lawful order by those officers, and why she pointed her vehicle toward another officer while hitting the gas. I suspect that a great deal of motivation was exactly from the kind of incendiary rhetoric we hear everyday from our radical democratic colleagues. It is a direct attack on the rule of law. Our ICE officers are enforcing federal law as the Congress wrote it. The Democrats here don’t like that law, they object to its enforcement, and they are actively encouraging citizens to obstruct its enforcement. In a nation of laws, the answer is not to obstruct the law, but to change it. We’re sitting in the very institution that writes these laws. If they believe the laws that enforce our nations sovereignty are wrong? Then they should make the case to change them. And Ms. Ross, I point out that when the Democrats had the majority and our nation was suffering through the worst illegal mass migration in its history, the immigration subcommittee under Democratic control held not a single hearing on that crisis as it unfolded, not one. I suspect their encouragement of disobedience to the law had a large role to play in the mind of the driver and in the minds of the increasingly violent mobs that our colleagues are deliberately inciting. As Lincoln said to their predecessors, “There is no grievance is a fit object for redress by mob law.” How sad the same words need to be repeated here. Before the House Judiciary Committee that’s supposed to be dedicated to the rule of law.

What I saw was an ICE vehicle attempting to leave an area that was in a near riot condition, a civilian vehicle then suddenly moved in front of it to block its departure. I then saw an ICE officer approach that vehicle and issue a lawful order to the driver to get out of the car. Instead of complying with that order, the driver backed up, pointed the car in the direction of another officer, and then shifted into drive, stepping on the gas while an officer had his hand on the door then accelerated in the direction of the other ICE officer at the moment he fired into the vehicle. That’s what the video shows, and we all have eyes and we all can see it. There are a lot of questions that it raises, starting with the perspective of the officer who fired at this approaching vehicle. Was the car indeed pointed directly at him when he fired? It certainly appeared that way to me from the video we’ve seen. I assume the officer was wearing a body camera and we’ll get a better idea of his perspective in the course of the investigation. There’s the question of why the driver attempted to block the ICE vehicle as it was leaving, why the driver felt motivated to obstruct clearly uniformed federal law enforcement officers in the performance of their duties, why she willfully refused to comply with a lawful order by those officers, and why she pointed her vehicle toward another officer while hitting the gas. I suspect that a great deal of motivation was exactly from the kind of incendiary rhetoric we hear everyday from our radical democratic colleagues. It is a direct attack on the rule of law. Our ICE officers are enforcing federal law as the Congress wrote it. The Democrats here don’t like that law, they object to its enforcement, and they are actively encouraging citizens to obstruct its enforcement. In a nation of laws, the answer is not to obstruct the law, but to change it. We’re sitting in the very institution that writes these laws. If they believe the laws that enforce our nations sovereignty are wrong? Then they should make the case to change them. And Ms. Ross, I point out that when the Democrats had the majority and our nation was suffering through the worst illegal mass migration in its history, the immigration subcommittee under Democratic control held not a single hearing on that crisis as it unfolded, not one. I suspect their encouragement of disobedience to the law had a large role to play in the mind of the driver and in the minds of the increasingly violent mobs that our colleagues are deliberately inciting. As Lincoln said to their predecessors, “There is no grievance is a fit object for redress by mob law.” How sad the same words need to be repeated here. Before the House Judiciary Committee that’s supposed to be dedicated to the rule of law.

Tom McClintock

355,139 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Sister in Law to Ong’ondo Were: It is not in darkness that Ong'ondo Were had his life threatened, a matter which he had already reported to the DCI. The perpetrator of this particular murder is known and there is a way of violence that is creeping up in Homa Bay politics that must be tamed by law enforcement authorities #JKLive Jeff Koinange, MBS

Sister in Law to Ong’ondo Were: It is not in darkness that Ong'ondo Were had his life threatened, a matter which he had already reported to the DCI. The perpetrator of this particular murder is known and there is a way of violence that is creeping up in Homa Bay politics that must be tamed by law enforcement authorities #JKLive Jeff Koinange, MBS

Citizen TV Kenya

313,297 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Thiessen: The majority of the people that Obama deported had no criminal records other than immigration violations. MacCallum: Most of those were at the border Thiessen: Donald Trump had a mandate to do what he's doing because he was elected on this. MacCallum: Even Trump has said that he wants a full investigation of this.

Thiessen: The majority of the people that Obama deported had no criminal records other than immigration violations. MacCallum: Most of those were at the border Thiessen: Donald Trump had a mandate to do what he's doing because he was elected on this. MacCallum: Even Trump has said that he wants a full investigation of this.

Acyn

71,153 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

WTF. At the Trump assassination press conference, they are now saying that law enforcement was responding to MULTIPLE reports of suspicious activity. Several suspicious occurrences allegedly happened outside of just the shooter on the roof. They address the fact that people were telling law enforcement that there was a man on the roof and saying he was outside of the secure area. Were there multiple people involved? What does this even mean? They have not officially released the name of the shooter to the press.

WTF. At the Trump assassination press conference, they are now saying that law enforcement was responding to MULTIPLE reports of suspicious activity. Several suspicious occurrences allegedly happened outside of just the shooter on the roof. They address the fact that people were telling law enforcement that there was a man on the roof and saying he was outside of the secure area. Were there multiple people involved? What does this even mean? They have not officially released the name of the shooter to the press.

Green Lives Matter

64,809 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

FULL VIDEO STATEMENT FROM CHAIRWOMAN Corrin Rankin REGARDING ON-GOING LOS ANGELES RIOTS: "What we saw in Los Angeles was not a peaceful protest, it was organized crime. Criminals attacked officers, police horses, and property with commercial grade fireworks, rocks, hammers, and other weapons. They burned our flag while waving the flags of foreign nations like conquerors in our streets. Hundreds were not arrested or charged while lives and property were threatened. This is the direct result of Democratic politicians who weaken our laws, undermine law enforcement, and encourage lawlessness. The American people voted to remove criminal illegal immigrants from our country. The president must be allowed to enforce the law. It is tragic that Democrats gave illegal immigrants false hope that they could stay regardless of their crimes. We must fully support law enforcement. Arrest and prosecute every criminal. And replace the Democratic politicians who encouraged this to happen. That is how we restore order and protect Californians."

FULL VIDEO STATEMENT FROM CHAIRWOMAN Corrin Rankin REGARDING ON-GOING LOS ANGELES RIOTS: "What we saw in Los Angeles was not a peaceful protest, it was organized crime. Criminals attacked officers, police horses, and property with commercial grade fireworks, rocks, hammers, and other weapons. They burned our flag while waving the flags of foreign nations like conquerors in our streets. Hundreds were not arrested or charged while lives and property were threatened. This is the direct result of Democratic politicians who weaken our laws, undermine law enforcement, and encourage lawlessness. The American people voted to remove criminal illegal immigrants from our country. The president must be allowed to enforce the law. It is tragic that Democrats gave illegal immigrants false hope that they could stay regardless of their crimes. We must fully support law enforcement. Arrest and prosecute every criminal. And replace the Democratic politicians who encouraged this to happen. That is how we restore order and protect Californians."

California Republican Party

43,172 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr