正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Jail. genuinely.

💀duoking1🐶

11,996 subscribers

18,365 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

John Cross should genuinely be looking at jail time for this. “A vanity signing from Arteta”

John Cross should genuinely be looking at jail time for this. “A vanity signing from Arteta”

Footalyse

330,459 次观看 • 7 个月前

Now my fear of jail is on a new level... 😳 Now I’m genuinely afraid of jail. His stories weren’t just stories—they were glimpses into something I never want to experience.😭

Now my fear of jail is on a new level... 😳 Now I’m genuinely afraid of jail. His stories weren’t just stories—they were glimpses into something I never want to experience.😭

YaseBlock B 🇸🇿

40,306 次观看 • 9 个月前

Niyadenee was genuinely SCARED for his life after finding out the guy she SNITCHED on is coming home from jail 😳👀💀

Sensitive content

Niyadenee was genuinely SCARED for his life after finding out the guy she SNITCHED on is coming home from jail 😳👀💀

Sen

1,000,151 次观看 • 1 个月前

Heath Ledger in ‘The Dark Knight’ stayed in character so intensely that his improvised clapping scene in the jail cell made the cast genuinely uncomfortable.

Heath Ledger in ‘The Dark Knight’ stayed in character so intensely that his improvised clapping scene in the jail cell made the cast genuinely uncomfortable.

Every Movie Plug

21,703 次观看 • 2 个月前

Doria Ragland has never been to jail. She raised Meghan. She has lived her life with dignity and grace. So I genuinely want to know—what has Meghan Markle done that makes people like Carole Malone so comfortable spreading dangerous lies (Continue)

Doria Ragland has never been to jail. She raised Meghan. She has lived her life with dignity and grace. So I genuinely want to know—what has Meghan Markle done that makes people like Carole Malone so comfortable spreading dangerous lies (Continue)

Gloria Sussex Arsenal

17,862 次观看 • 7 个月前

PC Ashley Aspinall said he 'was genuinely convinced (he) was going to die' following the assault while on duty in Blackpool in April last year. The chief constable of Lancashire police has slammed the decision not to jail the man who attacked Ashley.

PC Ashley Aspinall said he 'was genuinely convinced (he) was going to die' following the assault while on duty in Blackpool in April last year. The chief constable of Lancashire police has slammed the decision not to jail the man who attacked Ashley.

Good Morning Britain

72,459 次观看 • 2 年前

"I'm actually genuinely worried about Nick." - Andrew Tate explains why Nicholas J. Fuentes's life is in danger, why Tate went to jail, why Candace Owens is still alive, why Charlie Kirk is dead, & who is behind it all. This is the entire segment that last night's viral clips omitted.

"I'm actually genuinely worried about Nick." - Andrew Tate explains why Nicholas J. Fuentes's life is in danger, why Tate went to jail, why Candace Owens is still alive, why Charlie Kirk is dead, & who is behind it all. This is the entire segment that last night's viral clips omitted.

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

65,571 次观看 • 6 个月前

“I protested outside the BBC because Charlie Kirk was NOT far right - he was a moderate conservative who genuinely cared about the people he disagreed with.” “Imagine never setting foot in the UK, being told you have to pay for a state broadcaster and that you’ll go to JAIL if you don’t. You’d think we were in North Korea!” Kevin O'Sullivan | @YoungBobTPUK

“I protested outside the BBC because Charlie Kirk was NOT far right - he was a moderate conservative who genuinely cared about the people he disagreed with.” “Imagine never setting foot in the UK, being told you have to pay for a state broadcaster and that you’ll go to JAIL if you don’t. You’d think we were in North Korea!” Kevin O'Sullivan | @YoungBobTPUK

Talk

92,538 次观看 • 9 个月前

Crip Mac had Funny Marco’s guest Dax Flame genuinely SCARED after he started giving him dating advice and prison survival tips 😭💀 Funny Marco then set Dax up to have a barbecue at his house with Crip Mac that he had no choice but to accept 🤣 “Can you fight a little? Would you like to catch a friendly fade… You won’t survive jail or prison, they will extort you and might r-pe you.”

Crip Mac had Funny Marco’s guest Dax Flame genuinely SCARED after he started giving him dating advice and prison survival tips 😭💀 Funny Marco then set Dax up to have a barbecue at his house with Crip Mac that he had no choice but to accept 🤣 “Can you fight a little? Would you like to catch a friendly fade… You won’t survive jail or prison, they will extort you and might r-pe you.”

Killa 🌺

131,724 次观看 • 2 个月前

Boris Johnson: Ukraine is fundamentally different from Russia. In Ukraine, people genuinely don’t know the outcome of elections. In Russia, they know Putin is going to win. In Ukraine, they don’t shoot journalists, send opponents to Gulags, or poison them. In Russia, they do. They jail thousands of people. That’s why it’s so important for us to make the point to Putin about where Ukraine is going. It’s about direction, and we’re making a mistake by not saying it.

Boris Johnson: Ukraine is fundamentally different from Russia. In Ukraine, people genuinely don’t know the outcome of elections. In Russia, they know Putin is going to win. In Ukraine, they don’t shoot journalists, send opponents to Gulags, or poison them. In Russia, they do. They jail thousands of people. That’s why it’s so important for us to make the point to Putin about where Ukraine is going. It’s about direction, and we’re making a mistake by not saying it.

Kate from Kharkiv

78,606 次观看 • 23 天前

Such a cheap behaviour, #Kamrudin. I am being judged for supporting you, it’s okay, because I genuinely liked yo before you showed this side. But if you continue like this, you will be thrown out soon. I know the mistake is on both sides, but after her conversation with #WatermelonStar yesterday, she #VJParvathi #VJParvathi started portraying you as the villain and suddenly became a saint. Something happened in the jail area, and now you are asking for it "once more" on national television? Shame on you man I genuinely feel ashamed, man. It’s your personal matter, not something to display before the camera. If this behaviour continues, I will l accept my defeat and move on. My problem is, I don’t want to lose my ego. I will start focusing only on your positives until my interest fades away completely. My friends from #VishalArmy told me I’d regret supporting you. I fought for you against them, they are my family, yet I stood by you, Kamrudin. Now I’ve started feeling it… I don’t know when I’ll lose hope. Sorry Swathi bindu Christy Jenifer 🤍 SPARTAN 👑⚡ keepmoving on struggle Sumi ♥️ But still… if he changes, I will be genuinely happy. If not, I’ll accept my defeat, guys. 💔 #BiggBossTamil9 #BiggBoss9Tamild #BiggBoss9Tamil #KamrudinSquad sorry guys.

Such a cheap behaviour, #Kamrudin. I am being judged for supporting you, it’s okay, because I genuinely liked yo before you showed this side. But if you continue like this, you will be thrown out soon. I know the mistake is on both sides, but after her conversation with #WatermelonStar yesterday, she #VJParvathi #VJParvathi started portraying you as the villain and suddenly became a saint. Something happened in the jail area, and now you are asking for it "once more" on national television? Shame on you man I genuinely feel ashamed, man. It’s your personal matter, not something to display before the camera. If this behaviour continues, I will l accept my defeat and move on. My problem is, I don’t want to lose my ego. I will start focusing only on your positives until my interest fades away completely. My friends from #VishalArmy told me I’d regret supporting you. I fought for you against them, they are my family, yet I stood by you, Kamrudin. Now I’ve started feeling it… I don’t know when I’ll lose hope. Sorry Swathi bindu Christy Jenifer 🤍 SPARTAN 👑⚡ keepmoving on struggle Sumi ♥️ But still… if he changes, I will be genuinely happy. If not, I’ll accept my defeat, guys. 💔 #BiggBossTamil9 #BiggBoss9Tamild #BiggBoss9Tamil #KamrudinSquad sorry guys.

Guru

90,769 次观看 • 9 个月前

Pauline has been fighting for Australia since 1996. She formed One Nation in 1997 and has faced relentless media attacks, accusations and even jail. Last night her vision for our country was vindicated as people are finally waking up to the fact that our way of life is under threat. Although Labor has won a massive victory in the Lower House, the big takeaway from last night is that Australians are getting behind One Nation and the major parties better watch out. Pauline's commitment to no factions and to ensuring that her party is genuinely conservative is in stark contrast to the Liberals who have allowed leftists to infiltrate their party and become the so-called "moderates" faction. In reality, the mods are as far-left as the Greens and the Labor-left faction. They have killed the Liberal party from being an effective and unified voice for Australia. John Howard was wrong. The Liberal party should not be a "broad church". The leftists should be expelled and it should be a genuinely right-wing party. Interestingly in this interview (filmed late last year) Pauline acknowledged that Cory Bernardi's Australian Conservatives party never went anywhere. To her credit, she recruited Cory to her own party and he was a big factor in their strong win last night 🔥 Congratulations to Pauline, Cory and the entire One Nation team.

Pauline has been fighting for Australia since 1996. She formed One Nation in 1997 and has faced relentless media attacks, accusations and even jail. Last night her vision for our country was vindicated as people are finally waking up to the fact that our way of life is under threat. Although Labor has won a massive victory in the Lower House, the big takeaway from last night is that Australians are getting behind One Nation and the major parties better watch out. Pauline's commitment to no factions and to ensuring that her party is genuinely conservative is in stark contrast to the Liberals who have allowed leftists to infiltrate their party and become the so-called "moderates" faction. In reality, the mods are as far-left as the Greens and the Labor-left faction. They have killed the Liberal party from being an effective and unified voice for Australia. John Howard was wrong. The Liberal party should not be a "broad church". The leftists should be expelled and it should be a genuinely right-wing party. Interestingly in this interview (filmed late last year) Pauline acknowledged that Cory Bernardi's Australian Conservatives party never went anywhere. To her credit, she recruited Cory to her own party and he was a big factor in their strong win last night 🔥 Congratulations to Pauline, Cory and the entire One Nation team.

Dr Joanna Howe

17,065 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨WHAT THE HELL?!!! A North Carolina school district COVERED for a serial child mol*ster for 26 years... ...then quietly settled the civil suits for a MIND-BOGGLING $7 MILLION DOLLARS NOT A SINGLE ADMINISTRATOR WAS CHARGED. NOT A SINGLE ADMINISTRATOR WAS FIRED. NOT A SINGLE ADMINISTRATOR WENT TO JAIL. New Hanover County Schools has now paid nearly $7 MILLION for letting chemistry teacher Michael Kelly se*ually abuse MORE THAN 30 CHILDREN over 26 years. During Kelly's 2019 sentencing, the prosecutor revealed that Kelly told police the SCHOOL DISTRICT had already investigated him for the abuse... ...and CLEARED HIM. Without EVER contacting law enforcement. The NC Attorney General opened a FOUR-YEAR investigation into the district. He confirmed: "Administrators failed to protect children." ...but the statute of limitations had run out. Every single school administrator kept their job and wasn't even charged. This is genuinely one of the most shocking cases I've ever read. The final payout was was nearly $6.8 MILLION... and the last portion of that was just paid last week. Absolutely horrifying.

🚨WHAT THE HELL?!!! A North Carolina school district COVERED for a serial child molster for 26 years... ...then quietly settled the civil suits for a MIND-BOGGLING $7 MILLION DOLLARS NOT A SINGLE ADMINISTRATOR WAS CHARGED. NOT A SINGLE ADMINISTRATOR WAS FIRED. NOT A SINGLE ADMINISTRATOR WENT TO JAIL. New Hanover County Schools has now paid nearly $7 MILLION for letting chemistry teacher Michael Kelly seually abuse MORE THAN 30 CHILDREN over 26 years. During Kelly's 2019 sentencing, the prosecutor revealed that Kelly told police the SCHOOL DISTRICT had already investigated him for the abuse... ...and CLEARED HIM. Without EVER contacting law enforcement. The NC Attorney General opened a FOUR-YEAR investigation into the district. He confirmed: "Administrators failed to protect children." ...but the statute of limitations had run out. Every single school administrator kept their job and wasn't even charged. This is genuinely one of the most shocking cases I've ever read. The final payout was was nearly $6.8 MILLION... and the last portion of that was just paid last week. Absolutely horrifying.

Matt Van Swol

114,519 次观看 • 2 个月前

Tim Allen Loves the Ballet My old friend Tim Allen stopped by the studio the other day for a quick chat that went on for two hours. I didn’t know what we were going to discuss, and neither did he. Which is probably why we touched on everything from the importance of philosophy, shop class, redemption, mothers, quantum physics, skilled labor, The Book of Job, Schrodinger’s cat, the surprising appeal of ballet, a sense of humor, and sense of irony, a sense of wonder, his time in jail, his new TV show on ABC, and the end of the world as we know it. Not exactly what you’d expect from America’s Dad, but precisely what you’d hope to hear from a genuinely curious cat who has been there and done that a hundred times over. Our whole conversation is here. It’s a good one. Here is a short clip featuring a story about his beloved mother, who resisted his best attempts to get her into a wheelchair with a level of determination not often associated with women in their mid-nineties.

Tim Allen Loves the Ballet My old friend Tim Allen stopped by the studio the other day for a quick chat that went on for two hours. I didn’t know what we were going to discuss, and neither did he. Which is probably why we touched on everything from the importance of philosophy, shop class, redemption, mothers, quantum physics, skilled labor, The Book of Job, Schrodinger’s cat, the surprising appeal of ballet, a sense of humor, and sense of irony, a sense of wonder, his time in jail, his new TV show on ABC, and the end of the world as we know it. Not exactly what you’d expect from America’s Dad, but precisely what you’d hope to hear from a genuinely curious cat who has been there and done that a hundred times over. Our whole conversation is here. It’s a good one. Here is a short clip featuring a story about his beloved mother, who resisted his best attempts to get her into a wheelchair with a level of determination not often associated with women in their mid-nineties.

The Real Mike Rowe

95,488 次观看 • 1 年前

This debate didn't get too much traction but it should have... Just over a week ago, independent researcher Ben Pile debated one Dr Paul Dorfman on the climate and energy. They discussed all sorts of things: energy prices, wind farms, the "climate crisis"... Almost remarkably, every time Pile made a point, Dorfman dodged and even started resorting to insults. But it was Dorfman's comments at the end that really stood out. He said: "We are in a climate crisis, and we don’t necessarily need people who suggest otherwise". It marked an astonishing moment, with a supposed professor suggesting that debate—what he should cherish as an academic—isn't just helpful but damaging. And it's something we're increasingly seeing with pro-climate academics. In 2020, three senior climate academics published a paper on the Carbon Brief website that genuinely called for climate sceptics to be subject to "punishments". Such punishments for "misinformation", as they put it, included "fines or imprisonment". In other words, they suggested imprisoning their opponents. We needn't forget that state-subsidised "green" energy tycoon Dale Vince has also called for climate scepticism to be criminalised. The closer you look at the pro-climate lobby, the more you find these beliefs. They have an overt fascist problem. It might be obvious to say but if you're advocating jail time for people who suppose your arguments then your arguments can't be very good to begin with. For context, Dorfman is also heavily linked to the government, having worked as secretary to a Government Scientific Advisory Committee and an adviser for Ministry of Defence (MoD).

This debate didn't get too much traction but it should have... Just over a week ago, independent researcher Ben Pile debated one Dr Paul Dorfman on the climate and energy. They discussed all sorts of things: energy prices, wind farms, the "climate crisis"... Almost remarkably, every time Pile made a point, Dorfman dodged and even started resorting to insults. But it was Dorfman's comments at the end that really stood out. He said: "We are in a climate crisis, and we don’t necessarily need people who suggest otherwise". It marked an astonishing moment, with a supposed professor suggesting that debate—what he should cherish as an academic—isn't just helpful but damaging. And it's something we're increasingly seeing with pro-climate academics. In 2020, three senior climate academics published a paper on the Carbon Brief website that genuinely called for climate sceptics to be subject to "punishments". Such punishments for "misinformation", as they put it, included "fines or imprisonment". In other words, they suggested imprisoning their opponents. We needn't forget that state-subsidised "green" energy tycoon Dale Vince has also called for climate scepticism to be criminalised. The closer you look at the pro-climate lobby, the more you find these beliefs. They have an overt fascist problem. It might be obvious to say but if you're advocating jail time for people who suppose your arguments then your arguments can't be very good to begin with. For context, Dorfman is also heavily linked to the government, having worked as secretary to a Government Scientific Advisory Committee and an adviser for Ministry of Defence (MoD).

The Stark Naked Brief.

16,444 次观看 • 1 年前

DISHONORABLE JUDGES MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE! The same D.C. judges who spent years denying due process to Trump supporters are now suddenly activist champions of justice—but only for illegal immigrants. Judge James Boasberg is at the center of this hypocrisy, proving due process only matters when it serves the left's political agenda. Boasberg ruled that illegal immigrants and accused Tren de Aragua gang members cannot be deported under the Alien Enemies Act, claiming it violates their due process rights. On Monday, a D.C. panel heard the Trump administration’s appeal—one judge even went so far as to say that the United States treated Nazis better than the illegal migrants now that have since been deported to a jail in El Salvador. But where was this concern for due process when it came to American citizens targeted for January 6th and for protesting an election? Boasberg and D.C.’s judges allowed the Biden administration to label Trump supporters as domestic terrorists and insurrectionists —and some judges themselves publicly called J6 defendants "terrorists" before their trial. This destroyed these American’s chances of a fair jury pool or due process. But where was Judge Boberg’s outrage for due process then? To further illustrate, Judge Boasberg sentenced decorated NYPD officer and 9/11 first responder Sara Carpenter to years in prison- Sara was a nonviolent protester known for shaking a tambourine on January 6th. Boasberg even allowed the Justice Department to submitt her rosary beads and nativity set as evidence against her at her trial that were confiscated during an unconstitutional raid on her home. For four years, Trump supporters were violently beaten, denied medical care, locked in pretrial solitary confinement. No hearings. No presumption of innocence. NO BAIL OR TRIAL FOR MANY J6ers. Activist judges like Boasberg threw them into DC Jail, or D.C. Gulag, denying them their due process rights as Americans citizens. But now, Boasberg is fighting for illegal immigrants, while he sat deafeningly silent as Americans were tortured and jailed for protesting the election of Joe Biden—who just happens to be the former vice president of the president who appointed Boasberg. If due process genuinely mattered, Boasberg could have used his questionable, yet massive, ‘activist’ platform to speak out. He did not. Instead, he upholds a two-tiered justice system—where illegal immigrants get rights, but Trump supporters got years of solitary confinement in a Gulag a few miles away from this White House. So why does due process only apply when it benefits the left’s political agenda? If you support President Trump, you’re a domestic terrorist before trial. But if you break U.S. law and enter illegally, Boasberg and D.C.’s judiciary will fight for you. This isn’t about justice. It’s about power. And as long as activist judges control the courts, Americans will pay the price. Please follow our reporter Cara Castronuova and check out for full White House coverage! Donald J. Trump Mike Lindell Mike Lindell Rudy W. Giuliani The Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson ✝️ Emerald Robinson ✝️ Diamond and Silk® The Gateway Pundit Dr. Maria Died Suddenly Alison Steinberg Kristi Leigh General Mike Flynn Elon Musk Karoline Leavitt Karoline Leavitt Enrique Tarrio Jake Angeli-Chansley John W. Pork 🇺🇸 𝗧 𝗢 𝗠 𝗠 𝗬 ✦ 𝗧 𝗔 𝗧 𝗨 𝗠 ✦ 𝗡 𝗘 𝗪 𝗦 Micki Witthoeft We Are J6. Matt Braynard Lara Logan Tom Homan Kash Patel FBI Director Kash Patel Attorney General Pamela Bondi U.S. Department of Justice Rep. Jim Jordan Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 Rep. Barry Loudermilk Rep Andy Biggs House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Rep. James Comer Enrique Tarrio Joe Biggs

DISHONORABLE JUDGES MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE! The same D.C. judges who spent years denying due process to Trump supporters are now suddenly activist champions of justice—but only for illegal immigrants. Judge James Boasberg is at the center of this hypocrisy, proving due process only matters when it serves the left's political agenda. Boasberg ruled that illegal immigrants and accused Tren de Aragua gang members cannot be deported under the Alien Enemies Act, claiming it violates their due process rights. On Monday, a D.C. panel heard the Trump administration’s appeal—one judge even went so far as to say that the United States treated Nazis better than the illegal migrants now that have since been deported to a jail in El Salvador. But where was this concern for due process when it came to American citizens targeted for January 6th and for protesting an election? Boasberg and D.C.’s judges allowed the Biden administration to label Trump supporters as domestic terrorists and insurrectionists —and some judges themselves publicly called J6 defendants "terrorists" before their trial. This destroyed these American’s chances of a fair jury pool or due process. But where was Judge Boberg’s outrage for due process then? To further illustrate, Judge Boasberg sentenced decorated NYPD officer and 9/11 first responder Sara Carpenter to years in prison- Sara was a nonviolent protester known for shaking a tambourine on January 6th. Boasberg even allowed the Justice Department to submitt her rosary beads and nativity set as evidence against her at her trial that were confiscated during an unconstitutional raid on her home. For four years, Trump supporters were violently beaten, denied medical care, locked in pretrial solitary confinement. No hearings. No presumption of innocence. NO BAIL OR TRIAL FOR MANY J6ers. Activist judges like Boasberg threw them into DC Jail, or D.C. Gulag, denying them their due process rights as Americans citizens. But now, Boasberg is fighting for illegal immigrants, while he sat deafeningly silent as Americans were tortured and jailed for protesting the election of Joe Biden—who just happens to be the former vice president of the president who appointed Boasberg. If due process genuinely mattered, Boasberg could have used his questionable, yet massive, ‘activist’ platform to speak out. He did not. Instead, he upholds a two-tiered justice system—where illegal immigrants get rights, but Trump supporters got years of solitary confinement in a Gulag a few miles away from this White House. So why does due process only apply when it benefits the left’s political agenda? If you support President Trump, you’re a domestic terrorist before trial. But if you break U.S. law and enter illegally, Boasberg and D.C.’s judiciary will fight for you. This isn’t about justice. It’s about power. And as long as activist judges control the courts, Americans will pay the price. Please follow our reporter Cara Castronuova and check out for full White House coverage! Donald J. Trump Mike Lindell Mike Lindell Rudy W. Giuliani The Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson ✝️ Emerald Robinson ✝️ Diamond and Silk® The Gateway Pundit Dr. Maria Died Suddenly Alison Steinberg Kristi Leigh General Mike Flynn Elon Musk Karoline Leavitt Karoline Leavitt Enrique Tarrio Jake Angeli-Chansley John W. Pork 🇺🇸 𝗧 𝗢 𝗠 𝗠 𝗬 ✦ 𝗧 𝗔 𝗧 𝗨 𝗠 ✦ 𝗡 𝗘 𝗪 𝗦 Micki Witthoeft We Are J6. Matt Braynard Lara Logan Tom Homan Kash Patel FBI Director Kash Patel Attorney General Pamela Bondi U.S. Department of Justice Rep. Jim Jordan Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 Rep. Barry Loudermilk Rep Andy Biggs House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Rep. James Comer Enrique Tarrio Joe Biggs

LindellTV

67,793 次观看 • 1 年前

Stories after stories are surfacing, revealing the cruelty of the Zionist. Heliza and Hazwani Helmi, who were among the Malaysian delegates of the Global Sumud Flotilla mission. Here’s what they shared about their experience: - They firmly testified that the IDF soldiers are among the most inhumanly cruel people they have ever encountered. - Before the interception, their small boat was hit several times by high-pressure water cannons, violently shaking it. Despite the danger, the boat captain remained determined, checking their distance to Gaza and trying to move faster to reach it. The attacks continued until they were finally intercepted. - After the interception, they were forced to remain on the boat for seven to eight hours under the scorching sun. - The treatment they received after reaching the dock was even worse, the IDF soldiers’ cruelty intensified. - Their hands were tied behind their backs for hours. The last time they had water or food was on October 1. After that, they were denied both. - They said they genuinely thought they would die of thirst. When they begged for water, the soldiers ignored them. In desperation, they drank water from the toilet. - Before being taken to prison, Heliza was questioned by the IDF. When asked why she wanted to go to Gaza, she replied, “Because we want to give aid.” They asked, “What kind of aid?” She said, “Food aid.” When they mocked, “Why are there so many of you bringing food aid?” she answered, “To educate the world.” Upon hearing that, they smirked and said, “Welcome to jail.” - Hazwani recalled that before the interception, the IDF repeatedly hijacked their radio communication and even played a song with the haunting line, “Many more will have to suffer, many more will have to die, don’t ask me why.” - Several delegates needed medical attention, but when they requested medicine (after their supplies were confiscated), they were mocked. The soldiers sneered, “Have you died? If not, it’s not a problem.” - The sisters managed to keep their hijabs, though not without harassment. They said the female soldiers were even more vicious than the men. When ordered to remove their hijabs, they explained that it was mandatory for modesty. A male soldier later intervened, and after they explained they needed their hijabs for prayers, he allowed them to keep them on. - There were moments in their cell when delegates broke down crying together, thinking about how much worse the Palestinians endure every day. - One of the delegates sharing their cell was a 78 y.o. old woman with a broken leg, who still declared with unshaken faith, “We will return.” - They were blindfolded and confined in an extremely small space. - Only upon release were they finally given drinkable water, but it was recorded by the IDF for propaganda purposes. - Some delegates from Spain and Sweden are still detained. They told the Malaysian team to be grateful for Malaysia’s support of the Palestinian cause, and asked that the world be informed they chose to remain imprisoned as representatives of the Palestinians. - There were around 15 prison cells in total. - Before being released, every delegate shouted together, "Free, free Palestine!”unafraid even as IDF snipers pointed their guns at them. These testimonies are not just stories, they are evidence of the cruelty faced by those who stood up for humanity. Spread this. Let the world know how inhumanely Israhell treats those who dare to help Palestine, even more to the Palestinians themselves. #GlobalSumudFlottilla

Stories after stories are surfacing, revealing the cruelty of the Zionist. Heliza and Hazwani Helmi, who were among the Malaysian delegates of the Global Sumud Flotilla mission. Here’s what they shared about their experience: - They firmly testified that the IDF soldiers are among the most inhumanly cruel people they have ever encountered. - Before the interception, their small boat was hit several times by high-pressure water cannons, violently shaking it. Despite the danger, the boat captain remained determined, checking their distance to Gaza and trying to move faster to reach it. The attacks continued until they were finally intercepted. - After the interception, they were forced to remain on the boat for seven to eight hours under the scorching sun. - The treatment they received after reaching the dock was even worse, the IDF soldiers’ cruelty intensified. - Their hands were tied behind their backs for hours. The last time they had water or food was on October 1. After that, they were denied both. - They said they genuinely thought they would die of thirst. When they begged for water, the soldiers ignored them. In desperation, they drank water from the toilet. - Before being taken to prison, Heliza was questioned by the IDF. When asked why she wanted to go to Gaza, she replied, “Because we want to give aid.” They asked, “What kind of aid?” She said, “Food aid.” When they mocked, “Why are there so many of you bringing food aid?” she answered, “To educate the world.” Upon hearing that, they smirked and said, “Welcome to jail.” - Hazwani recalled that before the interception, the IDF repeatedly hijacked their radio communication and even played a song with the haunting line, “Many more will have to suffer, many more will have to die, don’t ask me why.” - Several delegates needed medical attention, but when they requested medicine (after their supplies were confiscated), they were mocked. The soldiers sneered, “Have you died? If not, it’s not a problem.” - The sisters managed to keep their hijabs, though not without harassment. They said the female soldiers were even more vicious than the men. When ordered to remove their hijabs, they explained that it was mandatory for modesty. A male soldier later intervened, and after they explained they needed their hijabs for prayers, he allowed them to keep them on. - There were moments in their cell when delegates broke down crying together, thinking about how much worse the Palestinians endure every day. - One of the delegates sharing their cell was a 78 y.o. old woman with a broken leg, who still declared with unshaken faith, “We will return.” - They were blindfolded and confined in an extremely small space. - Only upon release were they finally given drinkable water, but it was recorded by the IDF for propaganda purposes. - Some delegates from Spain and Sweden are still detained. They told the Malaysian team to be grateful for Malaysia’s support of the Palestinian cause, and asked that the world be informed they chose to remain imprisoned as representatives of the Palestinians. - There were around 15 prison cells in total. - Before being released, every delegate shouted together, "Free, free Palestine!”unafraid even as IDF snipers pointed their guns at them. These testimonies are not just stories, they are evidence of the cruelty faced by those who stood up for humanity. Spread this. Let the world know how inhumanely Israhell treats those who dare to help Palestine, even more to the Palestinians themselves. #GlobalSumudFlottilla

nad

247,272 次观看 • 10 个月前

How it is not Politics? - Talking about a political leader for 120 min. How it is not Politics? -How it is not Politics? Calling him "Security threat" when national and international surveys show more than 70 % popularity for him, and when his party holds simple majority in parliament despite all rigging and manipulations. This narrative was busted even then and there by the journalists' questions who reminded DGISPR that in the past Fatima jinnah, Liaqat Ali khan, Hussain Sehrwardi, Bacha khan and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto were also labelled "anti state" by the establishment. - How it is not Politics? Calling him "traitor like Mujeeb" when there is no evidence of traitorship against Mujeeb objectively. The Government of Pak filed "Agartala conspiracy case" against Mujeeb in 1968 and then took it back in 1969 itself. When nowhere in Hamood ur rehman commission report, the word "traitor" is mentioned for mujeeb, rather he was the most popular leader then securing 160 seats vs 82 seats of PPP. Imran Khan's scenario is no different. Securing more than 170 seats and yet a party with 17 seats was given the government, and the leader of the majority was incarcerated. By calling Khan traitor like Mujeeb, the DG ISPR admits that even today Yahya like mentality is governing. How it is not Politics? - How it is not Politics? Calling the CM of 40 million people of KPK "Barking" - the so called inflated narrative that it is the most professional and disciplined institution has been self-bulldozed. -How it is not Politics? Criticizing a party chair man for scolding his own party members for joining the NDU meeting. That was a big surprise to me. The same establishment has been calling PTI members "traitors and foreign agents and anti state" for the last 3 years, and has been filing FIRs against them through "namaloom" people, yet their anger about an internal affair of a political party is surprising when the Chairman calls a few "mir jafar". And why would he not? When a state institution has become a political party in totality; doing such press conferences, doing such political victimization; then why would the party chairman of a real political party not forbid his members to go to sessions of such institution who is no more neutral. And how criticizing such response of Khan is not Politics? How it is not Politics? Calling him "a beggar taking "kashkol" in front of India" if he were the PM at the time of May war? It is factually wrong. When in Feb 2019, India did surgical strike, it was PM Imran Khan who gave them a befitting reply. The way anger wipes away basic facts is genuinely surprising. How it is not Politics? Calling him "mentally sick" when all the medical check ups in the jail proved that he is mentally sane and sound proves nothing but a knee jerk response to his naming of the Army chief 2 days ago. How it is not Politics and personal grudge? The pressor starts with Imran Khan and ends with Imran khan, and then with a plea that "Keep us away from the Politics" I am surprised. How it is not Politics? ----------------------------------------------------- Ryan Grim Moeed Pirzada

How it is not Politics? - Talking about a political leader for 120 min. How it is not Politics? -How it is not Politics? Calling him "Security threat" when national and international surveys show more than 70 % popularity for him, and when his party holds simple majority in parliament despite all rigging and manipulations. This narrative was busted even then and there by the journalists' questions who reminded DGISPR that in the past Fatima jinnah, Liaqat Ali khan, Hussain Sehrwardi, Bacha khan and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto were also labelled "anti state" by the establishment. - How it is not Politics? Calling him "traitor like Mujeeb" when there is no evidence of traitorship against Mujeeb objectively. The Government of Pak filed "Agartala conspiracy case" against Mujeeb in 1968 and then took it back in 1969 itself. When nowhere in Hamood ur rehman commission report, the word "traitor" is mentioned for mujeeb, rather he was the most popular leader then securing 160 seats vs 82 seats of PPP. Imran Khan's scenario is no different. Securing more than 170 seats and yet a party with 17 seats was given the government, and the leader of the majority was incarcerated. By calling Khan traitor like Mujeeb, the DG ISPR admits that even today Yahya like mentality is governing. How it is not Politics? - How it is not Politics? Calling the CM of 40 million people of KPK "Barking" - the so called inflated narrative that it is the most professional and disciplined institution has been self-bulldozed. -How it is not Politics? Criticizing a party chair man for scolding his own party members for joining the NDU meeting. That was a big surprise to me. The same establishment has been calling PTI members "traitors and foreign agents and anti state" for the last 3 years, and has been filing FIRs against them through "namaloom" people, yet their anger about an internal affair of a political party is surprising when the Chairman calls a few "mir jafar". And why would he not? When a state institution has become a political party in totality; doing such press conferences, doing such political victimization; then why would the party chairman of a real political party not forbid his members to go to sessions of such institution who is no more neutral. And how criticizing such response of Khan is not Politics? How it is not Politics? Calling him "a beggar taking "kashkol" in front of India" if he were the PM at the time of May war? It is factually wrong. When in Feb 2019, India did surgical strike, it was PM Imran Khan who gave them a befitting reply. The way anger wipes away basic facts is genuinely surprising. How it is not Politics? Calling him "mentally sick" when all the medical check ups in the jail proved that he is mentally sane and sound proves nothing but a knee jerk response to his naming of the Army chief 2 days ago. How it is not Politics and personal grudge? The pressor starts with Imran Khan and ends with Imran khan, and then with a plea that "Keep us away from the Politics" I am surprised. How it is not Politics? ----------------------------------------------------- Ryan Grim Moeed Pirzada

Dr Waqas Nawaz

26,453 次观看 • 8 个月前

A Twist in the Tale: Has BJP become the adda of corrupt? In the run up to the 2014 general elections, the BJP centred its campaign around alleged corruption under the Congress-led UPA government, promising ‘ache din’ . Several times during the campaign, Narendra Modi Ji grandiloquently promised to jail the corrupt. He was equally loud about bringing back 'all the looted money stashed away in Swiss banks and eliminating black money'. People gave BJP a decisive mandate and Modi became PM in 2014. On 8th November 2016 in a public broadcast PM Modi declared that Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes would cease to be legal tender and grandiosely announced that the purpose of #demonetisation was to crackdown on corruption and eliminate black money. It, however, turned out to be spurious. Recently, Supreme Court Justice B. V. Nagarathna said in a conference in Hyderabad that in the Indian economy at that time, Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes comprised 86% of the currency and wondered about the goal of the demonetisation exercise since 98% of those notes came back to banks. She also questioned about black money eradication as demonetisation became a good way of converting black money into white money. In 2017 the BJP government introduced #ElectoralBond Scheme, which was anonymous financial contributions to political parties, by amending several laws namely, the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the Companies Act, 2013, the Income Tax Act, 1961. Its avowed purpose was to enhance transparency and accountability in political funding by eliminating black money, corruption. etc. The Supreme Court has recently struck down this secret political funding as unconstitutional and directed disclosure of complete details of all electoral bonds. From the data available in public domain, thanks to the Supreme Court, it came to light that the BJP is the biggest beneficiary as out of total Rs. 11,450 crores it received Rs. 6,566 crores which is 57%. Contemporaneous evidence indicates that #ElectoralBonds have all the ingredients of a huge scam such as quid pro quo and corruption, shell and loss making companies donating to political parties huge sums of money suspected to be kickbacks, and laundering of black money. In order to shield our democratic process from foreign interference, the laws regulating foreign contributions prohibited political parties and candidates in elections from accepting foreign contributions. But the BJP government through Finance Acts, 2016 and 2018 amended with retrospective effect the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act, 2010 (#FCRA) by changing the definition of ‘foreign source’ not only condoning the past illegalities committed but also permitting political parties to receive foreign funds, and thereby paved way for foreign intrusion into our political and electoral process compromising our sovereignty. Further, notwithstanding the huge propaganda of alleged action against Foreign Funded NGOs, there has been a huge spike in #FCRA remittances since the 2014-15. While during the 20 years between financial years 1994-1995 and 2013-14 an amount of Rs. 1,51,036 Crores was received, during the 8 years between 2014-15 and 2023-24 Rs. 1,46,392 was received. Data for financial years 2022-23 and 2023-24 is not yet available. However, from the trends of #FCRA remittances in the preceding years it will be around Rs. 50,000 Crores together for both the financial years, making the total FCRA remittances during 10 year rule of BJP to be around Rs. 2,00,000 Crores which is humongous. Even if a small fraction of that huge amount of foreign funds has gone to political parties or candidates in elections, it amounts to serious subversion of our democracy and constitution. What sort of patriotism is this? Several months prior to 2014 general elections, a spate of alleged scams during UPA rule surfaced namely, Chit Fund scam, Chopper scam, Tatra truck scam, 2G Spectrum scam, CWG scam, Coal scam, Adarsh scam, etc. The courts, CBI, ED and IT proactively initiated action as a result several Congress and UPA leaders came under scanner. Though the BJP came to power on the anti-corruption plank, hardly any political leaders of significance was convicted, nor even paisa of black money stashed away in Swiss banks was brought back. On the other hand, the BJP has allegedly been misusing the law enforcement agencies to arm-twist the opposition political leaders under cloud either to defect to or align with the BJP. Out of 25 important opposition leaders who were allegedly under the scanner and joined BJP, 23 have reportedly got reprieve. Politicians like Andhra Pradesh CM YS Jagan who faces 38 criminal cases including 11 CBI and 7 ED cases, have been buying peace from the BJP. As a result none of his cases have seen the light of the day, notwithstanding the direction of Supreme Court to speed up trial of cases against politicians. Likewise, the DMK leaders namely, the Maran brothers, A. Raja, Karunanidhi’s daughter Kanimozhi have been acquitted, after they not so secretly cosied up to BJP, thanks to the lacklustre prosecution of their cases before the courts. These are only representative examples of how the BJP has become the adda for the leaders facing allegations of corruption, money laundering, etc. It is quite possible that some of them may be genuinely innocent. But as their innocence has been established only after their defection to or aligning with the ruling BJP, it creates dark shadows by raising serious moral questions. Last year, fourteen political parties approached the Supreme Court against the alleged misuse of central investigating agencies in arresting opposition political leaders and other citizens exercising their fundamental right to dissent and disagree with the ruling BJP. It was alleged that 95% of political leaders investigated by CBI and ED belong to opposition. That is, out of 121 prominent politicians facing ED probe between 2014 and 2022, 115 are opposition leaders who had been booked, raided, questioned or arrested. To wriggle out of or deflect the allegations of promoting corruption, shielding the corrupt who have joined or aligned with the BJP and targeting opposition leaders, etc, one of the standard refrains of the BJP has been that as Narendra Modi has no family he cannot be corrupt or has no motivation to be corrupt or shield the corrupt. That is a disingenuous argument. Late Jayalalitha, who was a spinster with no family, was convicted for corruption and was sent to jail. There are many prominent leaders who are unmarried or have no families facing cases or allegations of corruption. I don’t mean to even hint let alone allege that Narendra Modi is personally financially corrupt. I merely want to call out their bluff by highlighting the point that there is no connection between one’s familial status and corruption. It must be recalled that Manmohan Singh, whose personal financial integrity was impeccable, presided over a corrupt regime. As such, personal financial honesty of PM or a CM is meaningless if his party and government are not honest. Barring honourable exceptions, every political party while in opposition grandiloquently talks against corruption, not necessarily because they are honest, but because they try to make a virtue of out of lack of opportunities to make money. Notwithstanding its anti-corruption rhetoric the BJP is no stranger to corruption as its unsavory history tells. In 2001, none other than its National President late Bangaru Laxman was caught on the camera taking bribe from one Mathew Samuel, and was later convicted by a Special CBI Court on 27th April 2012 and sentenced to four years in jail. Further, BJP’s former CM of Karnataka Sri B. S. Yeddyurappa faced charges of corruption and was also in jail for a while. There are allegations of misdeeds of BJP government in PM-CARES Fund which is mired in secrecy, in sale of Air India to Tatas for peanuts, about CAG’s concern about astronomical escalation in cost of construction of Dwarka Expressway from Rs. 18.2 crores per km to Rs. 251 crores per km, in the utility of more than Rs. 14,000 crores public funds for Namami Gange project while the sacred Ganga is on the verge becoming a sewer like Yamuna, and several others. The #ElectoralBondScam which points to several alleged scams, is only a tip of the iceberg. It seems further action to take it to logical end has come to a naught. Therefore, having seen the fate of investigation and trial of all the alleged scams and how the political class sabotage, it is imperative that a Special Investigation Team (SIT) comprising serving or retired officers specially chosen by the Supreme Court, which will not be part of any Law Enforcement Agency but independently directly reporting to the Supreme Court, would alone will be able to unravel the truth. It is pertinent to recall the stellar role of RTI Act and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (before it was amended in 2018) in exposing alleged corruption in the Congress-led UPA government. Information is power. So, the RTI Act empowered people to seek information from public authorities on all official matters (barring a very few exceptions). Based on that information obtained through RTI process about alleged corrupt deals, illegalities, etc during UPA rule, the CBI which had no legal shackles could initiate enquiries and investigation into those allegations. The BJP while in opposition used and exploited this situation to the hilt to oust the Congress-led UPA from power. And having formed government the BJP is acutely aware of the dangers for the corrupt lurking in these laws. So they have systematically wrecked the RTI Act so much so that it has gone from citizens’ most powerful tool to an Act on life support. In 2018 they amended the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. As per new section 17A introduced therein, “No police officer shall conduct any enquiry or inquiry or investigation into any offence alleged to have been committed by a public servant under this Act, where the alleged offence is relatable to any recommendation made or decision taken by such public servant in discharge of his official functions or duties, without the previous approval” of respective governments or appointing authority of the public servant. Which government will permit investigation into its own misdeeds? While Justice R. M. Lodha in 2013 denounced the CBI as a ‘caged parrot’, the BJP government translated his oral observation into a legal reality by destroying the Prevention of Corruption Act. Evidently, the real purpose of BJP undermining RTI Act and emasculating the CBI was to prevent visitation of fate similar to that of UPA by insulating and firewalling themselves from any future enquiries and investigations into their alleged corrupt deeds. Finally, there is an uncanny resemblance between the BJP’s anti-corruption rhetoric with a story in Jeffrey Archer’s popular book, ‘A Twist in the Tale’, which goes like this: Ignatius Agarbi was the new Financial Minister of Nigeria. He begins a sweep on corruption and makes a name for himself. Impressed by his extreme honesty, his president entrusted him to find out how many Nigerians have stashed their bribes in Switzerland. He arrives at the Swiss Bank with a briefcase. Despite his greatest persuasion, the Swiss banker refuses to break their code of privacy. In the end, Ignatius places a gun to the head of the Swiss banker and threatens to kill him. Still the banker refuses to divulge any confidential information. Ignatius, who was actually extremely corrupt, was only checking to find out if the Swiss Banks would actually reveal the name of an account holder. Delighted with their secrecy, Ignatius deposits $5 million in cash which he had skimmed as Financial Minister.”

A Twist in the Tale: Has BJP become the adda of corrupt? In the run up to the 2014 general elections, the BJP centred its campaign around alleged corruption under the Congress-led UPA government, promising ‘ache din’ . Several times during the campaign, Narendra Modi Ji grandiloquently promised to jail the corrupt. He was equally loud about bringing back 'all the looted money stashed away in Swiss banks and eliminating black money'. People gave BJP a decisive mandate and Modi became PM in 2014. On 8th November 2016 in a public broadcast PM Modi declared that Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes would cease to be legal tender and grandiosely announced that the purpose of #demonetisation was to crackdown on corruption and eliminate black money. It, however, turned out to be spurious. Recently, Supreme Court Justice B. V. Nagarathna said in a conference in Hyderabad that in the Indian economy at that time, Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes comprised 86% of the currency and wondered about the goal of the demonetisation exercise since 98% of those notes came back to banks. She also questioned about black money eradication as demonetisation became a good way of converting black money into white money. In 2017 the BJP government introduced #ElectoralBond Scheme, which was anonymous financial contributions to political parties, by amending several laws namely, the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the Companies Act, 2013, the Income Tax Act, 1961. Its avowed purpose was to enhance transparency and accountability in political funding by eliminating black money, corruption. etc. The Supreme Court has recently struck down this secret political funding as unconstitutional and directed disclosure of complete details of all electoral bonds. From the data available in public domain, thanks to the Supreme Court, it came to light that the BJP is the biggest beneficiary as out of total Rs. 11,450 crores it received Rs. 6,566 crores which is 57%. Contemporaneous evidence indicates that #ElectoralBonds have all the ingredients of a huge scam such as quid pro quo and corruption, shell and loss making companies donating to political parties huge sums of money suspected to be kickbacks, and laundering of black money. In order to shield our democratic process from foreign interference, the laws regulating foreign contributions prohibited political parties and candidates in elections from accepting foreign contributions. But the BJP government through Finance Acts, 2016 and 2018 amended with retrospective effect the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act, 2010 (#FCRA) by changing the definition of ‘foreign source’ not only condoning the past illegalities committed but also permitting political parties to receive foreign funds, and thereby paved way for foreign intrusion into our political and electoral process compromising our sovereignty. Further, notwithstanding the huge propaganda of alleged action against Foreign Funded NGOs, there has been a huge spike in #FCRA remittances since the 2014-15. While during the 20 years between financial years 1994-1995 and 2013-14 an amount of Rs. 1,51,036 Crores was received, during the 8 years between 2014-15 and 2023-24 Rs. 1,46,392 was received. Data for financial years 2022-23 and 2023-24 is not yet available. However, from the trends of #FCRA remittances in the preceding years it will be around Rs. 50,000 Crores together for both the financial years, making the total FCRA remittances during 10 year rule of BJP to be around Rs. 2,00,000 Crores which is humongous. Even if a small fraction of that huge amount of foreign funds has gone to political parties or candidates in elections, it amounts to serious subversion of our democracy and constitution. What sort of patriotism is this? Several months prior to 2014 general elections, a spate of alleged scams during UPA rule surfaced namely, Chit Fund scam, Chopper scam, Tatra truck scam, 2G Spectrum scam, CWG scam, Coal scam, Adarsh scam, etc. The courts, CBI, ED and IT proactively initiated action as a result several Congress and UPA leaders came under scanner. Though the BJP came to power on the anti-corruption plank, hardly any political leaders of significance was convicted, nor even paisa of black money stashed away in Swiss banks was brought back. On the other hand, the BJP has allegedly been misusing the law enforcement agencies to arm-twist the opposition political leaders under cloud either to defect to or align with the BJP. Out of 25 important opposition leaders who were allegedly under the scanner and joined BJP, 23 have reportedly got reprieve. Politicians like Andhra Pradesh CM YS Jagan who faces 38 criminal cases including 11 CBI and 7 ED cases, have been buying peace from the BJP. As a result none of his cases have seen the light of the day, notwithstanding the direction of Supreme Court to speed up trial of cases against politicians. Likewise, the DMK leaders namely, the Maran brothers, A. Raja, Karunanidhi’s daughter Kanimozhi have been acquitted, after they not so secretly cosied up to BJP, thanks to the lacklustre prosecution of their cases before the courts. These are only representative examples of how the BJP has become the adda for the leaders facing allegations of corruption, money laundering, etc. It is quite possible that some of them may be genuinely innocent. But as their innocence has been established only after their defection to or aligning with the ruling BJP, it creates dark shadows by raising serious moral questions. Last year, fourteen political parties approached the Supreme Court against the alleged misuse of central investigating agencies in arresting opposition political leaders and other citizens exercising their fundamental right to dissent and disagree with the ruling BJP. It was alleged that 95% of political leaders investigated by CBI and ED belong to opposition. That is, out of 121 prominent politicians facing ED probe between 2014 and 2022, 115 are opposition leaders who had been booked, raided, questioned or arrested. To wriggle out of or deflect the allegations of promoting corruption, shielding the corrupt who have joined or aligned with the BJP and targeting opposition leaders, etc, one of the standard refrains of the BJP has been that as Narendra Modi has no family he cannot be corrupt or has no motivation to be corrupt or shield the corrupt. That is a disingenuous argument. Late Jayalalitha, who was a spinster with no family, was convicted for corruption and was sent to jail. There are many prominent leaders who are unmarried or have no families facing cases or allegations of corruption. I don’t mean to even hint let alone allege that Narendra Modi is personally financially corrupt. I merely want to call out their bluff by highlighting the point that there is no connection between one’s familial status and corruption. It must be recalled that Manmohan Singh, whose personal financial integrity was impeccable, presided over a corrupt regime. As such, personal financial honesty of PM or a CM is meaningless if his party and government are not honest. Barring honourable exceptions, every political party while in opposition grandiloquently talks against corruption, not necessarily because they are honest, but because they try to make a virtue of out of lack of opportunities to make money. Notwithstanding its anti-corruption rhetoric the BJP is no stranger to corruption as its unsavory history tells. In 2001, none other than its National President late Bangaru Laxman was caught on the camera taking bribe from one Mathew Samuel, and was later convicted by a Special CBI Court on 27th April 2012 and sentenced to four years in jail. Further, BJP’s former CM of Karnataka Sri B. S. Yeddyurappa faced charges of corruption and was also in jail for a while. There are allegations of misdeeds of BJP government in PM-CARES Fund which is mired in secrecy, in sale of Air India to Tatas for peanuts, about CAG’s concern about astronomical escalation in cost of construction of Dwarka Expressway from Rs. 18.2 crores per km to Rs. 251 crores per km, in the utility of more than Rs. 14,000 crores public funds for Namami Gange project while the sacred Ganga is on the verge becoming a sewer like Yamuna, and several others. The #ElectoralBondScam which points to several alleged scams, is only a tip of the iceberg. It seems further action to take it to logical end has come to a naught. Therefore, having seen the fate of investigation and trial of all the alleged scams and how the political class sabotage, it is imperative that a Special Investigation Team (SIT) comprising serving or retired officers specially chosen by the Supreme Court, which will not be part of any Law Enforcement Agency but independently directly reporting to the Supreme Court, would alone will be able to unravel the truth. It is pertinent to recall the stellar role of RTI Act and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (before it was amended in 2018) in exposing alleged corruption in the Congress-led UPA government. Information is power. So, the RTI Act empowered people to seek information from public authorities on all official matters (barring a very few exceptions). Based on that information obtained through RTI process about alleged corrupt deals, illegalities, etc during UPA rule, the CBI which had no legal shackles could initiate enquiries and investigation into those allegations. The BJP while in opposition used and exploited this situation to the hilt to oust the Congress-led UPA from power. And having formed government the BJP is acutely aware of the dangers for the corrupt lurking in these laws. So they have systematically wrecked the RTI Act so much so that it has gone from citizens’ most powerful tool to an Act on life support. In 2018 they amended the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. As per new section 17A introduced therein, “No police officer shall conduct any enquiry or inquiry or investigation into any offence alleged to have been committed by a public servant under this Act, where the alleged offence is relatable to any recommendation made or decision taken by such public servant in discharge of his official functions or duties, without the previous approval” of respective governments or appointing authority of the public servant. Which government will permit investigation into its own misdeeds? While Justice R. M. Lodha in 2013 denounced the CBI as a ‘caged parrot’, the BJP government translated his oral observation into a legal reality by destroying the Prevention of Corruption Act. Evidently, the real purpose of BJP undermining RTI Act and emasculating the CBI was to prevent visitation of fate similar to that of UPA by insulating and firewalling themselves from any future enquiries and investigations into their alleged corrupt deeds. Finally, there is an uncanny resemblance between the BJP’s anti-corruption rhetoric with a story in Jeffrey Archer’s popular book, ‘A Twist in the Tale’, which goes like this: Ignatius Agarbi was the new Financial Minister of Nigeria. He begins a sweep on corruption and makes a name for himself. Impressed by his extreme honesty, his president entrusted him to find out how many Nigerians have stashed their bribes in Switzerland. He arrives at the Swiss Bank with a briefcase. Despite his greatest persuasion, the Swiss banker refuses to break their code of privacy. In the end, Ignatius places a gun to the head of the Swiss banker and threatens to kill him. Still the banker refuses to divulge any confidential information. Ignatius, who was actually extremely corrupt, was only checking to find out if the Swiss Banks would actually reveal the name of an account holder. Delighted with their secrecy, Ignatius deposits $5 million in cash which he had skimmed as Financial Minister.”

M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)

239,217 次观看 • 2 年前

"I'm still a little suspicious of who they know, but I don't think that's the big deal. I don't think Jen McCabe's social life is the big deal. Nobody cares. Nobody fucking cares. Sorry for cussing. "The big issue is that Jen was friends with Brian Tully. Tully's unit knew literally where the bodies were buried. And I think they brought on the PI, Marty Kraft, and Kate Peter to insulate their exposure [as to Sandra Birchmore] from the coming publicity that they knew was going to be brought upon them by Alan Jackson. "Therefore, I think what Alan Jackson's actual plan was—I don't think he ever said this, but this is what I think he was up to. I think Alan Jackson was using the fact that this unit had to sense that the more attention got paid to them, the more the microscope of national and international focus zeroed in on Norfolk County, Massachusetts, the more likely it was that Sandra Birchmore's grave was going to become the locus of the investigatory scrutiny. And that is why I believe they had something to hide. Tully had something to hide. Fanning had something to hide. Yuri had something to hide. Guarino had something to hide, although I'm pretty sure they made him do it. They had something to hide, in my opinion. And so they were worried. "And who would you bring in? If you had covered up a murder—if you were a state police unit—you'd bring in someone like Kate Peter. Because you can read her in on that. She's hardened. She doesn't give a fuck. She lost two of her kids. And I don't think she even fucking cared. So who the fuck is the perfect person? Be like, 'If that shit gets national attention, we're fucked. So you better control that fucking narrative and handle all these different people who get too close to this, or we're going to get our spot blown up here—not literally, figuratively. We're going to be exposed for what we did with Birchmore.'" "That's what really pisses me off. Like, that it's so hardened. It's such a jaded fucking view of the world. It's like people who leverage children to stay in other people's lives. Okay, they're the sickest, most demented humans, especially if they're only not in jail because they gave people up or something like that for serious drug crimes. And then they walk around like sanctimonious hypocrites. That's the only type of person in the world that I loathe more than someone who would knowingly try to manipulate a public narrative to insulate a state police unit from accountability for covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder. It's the lowest, most disgusting, most base form of existence. It requires one to have literally numbed their soul to the point where you can sleep at night, having participated in that. I don't think there's enough alcohol, drugs, or sedatives in the world that could make me sleep if I was a party to such a thing. And I question how some of these people do it. "But let me bring it back to the point here, which is: In 2022, the feds clearly—I believe—were starting to poke around. And come 2023, I think Brian Tully's unit was desperate. Who was going to find out because of the coverage of the Read case? Could they make sure that Kate Peter got close enough to Netflix and Gretchen Voss so that they couldn't find out what was actually going on? And could the Birchmore cover-up be kept alive, even in light of the national spotlight? "When you think about it from that perspective—when you think about the fact that some people may not have been loyal to the Justice for John O'Keefe movement, but were instead primarily loyal to Brian Tully's unit. And when you think about the fact that maybe Tully's unit didn't run the best investigation on Karen Read—maybe there were some flaws. But if you think about the fact that they did get her. But if you think about it in the context that Karen knew from the jump that the MSP were dirty over Birchmore, then you understand why it was going to become an incident. Everyone knew—everyone around Tully, his friends, all of them, the unit—they knew they covered up Birchmore's murder. And they knew Karen had it in her hands if she could just figure out the PR. And that's exactly what she did to put enough pressure on them. They took her to trial anyway, and it destroyed the fucking Norfolk DA. It destroyed Brian Tully's unit. It cost them dearly, and she's a tactical fucking genius. "I'm fully of the opinion that Karen Read staged a fake falling out with Natalie so that Natalie would get in the orbit of the MSP in June, July, and August of 2023 and feed information back to Karen. Likewise, I think Brian Tully thought he was slicker than he was by using the criminal prosecution of Aidan Kearney—not to get a genuinely, in my opinion, bad guy who was deserving of the indictment handed up by a grand jury of his peers. But because Tully wanted to know what the real target of the federal probe is. "If you don't know what a backhand is, folks, a backhand is where you investigate one thing on the surface, because you're dealing with a very, very high-level operation like the state police, who are a paramilitary intelligence-gathering operation. So you trick them. You make them think they're under investigation for John's death and the investigation of that death, but really you're investigating them for the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. And that's exactly what I think happened to this unit. That's what I think Brian Tully was trying to figure out from August of 2023 until about December. I think they eventually put it together, and by August of 2024, Matthew Farwell got wind of it and died. "Now it's a question of all this as a result of today. I want to be very clear: This is what was called for. There needed to be an independent voice with power—who takes no nonsense—who came into this and said, "Nope, it's out of your hands." And that's what Judge Doolin did today. The exposure potential—someone just needed to not be involved with Karen Read, Kearney, or the Norfolk DA, or Kate Peter or Marty Kraft, and prosecute this. Now, all those other witnesses, I have no idea what the hell is going to happen there, but at least for Lindsey Gaetani, Judge Doolin said, 'enough of this nonsense.'"

"I'm still a little suspicious of who they know, but I don't think that's the big deal. I don't think Jen McCabe's social life is the big deal. Nobody cares. Nobody fucking cares. Sorry for cussing. "The big issue is that Jen was friends with Brian Tully. Tully's unit knew literally where the bodies were buried. And I think they brought on the PI, Marty Kraft, and Kate Peter to insulate their exposure [as to Sandra Birchmore] from the coming publicity that they knew was going to be brought upon them by Alan Jackson. "Therefore, I think what Alan Jackson's actual plan was—I don't think he ever said this, but this is what I think he was up to. I think Alan Jackson was using the fact that this unit had to sense that the more attention got paid to them, the more the microscope of national and international focus zeroed in on Norfolk County, Massachusetts, the more likely it was that Sandra Birchmore's grave was going to become the locus of the investigatory scrutiny. And that is why I believe they had something to hide. Tully had something to hide. Fanning had something to hide. Yuri had something to hide. Guarino had something to hide, although I'm pretty sure they made him do it. They had something to hide, in my opinion. And so they were worried. "And who would you bring in? If you had covered up a murder—if you were a state police unit—you'd bring in someone like Kate Peter. Because you can read her in on that. She's hardened. She doesn't give a fuck. She lost two of her kids. And I don't think she even fucking cared. So who the fuck is the perfect person? Be like, 'If that shit gets national attention, we're fucked. So you better control that fucking narrative and handle all these different people who get too close to this, or we're going to get our spot blown up here—not literally, figuratively. We're going to be exposed for what we did with Birchmore.'" "That's what really pisses me off. Like, that it's so hardened. It's such a jaded fucking view of the world. It's like people who leverage children to stay in other people's lives. Okay, they're the sickest, most demented humans, especially if they're only not in jail because they gave people up or something like that for serious drug crimes. And then they walk around like sanctimonious hypocrites. That's the only type of person in the world that I loathe more than someone who would knowingly try to manipulate a public narrative to insulate a state police unit from accountability for covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder. It's the lowest, most disgusting, most base form of existence. It requires one to have literally numbed their soul to the point where you can sleep at night, having participated in that. I don't think there's enough alcohol, drugs, or sedatives in the world that could make me sleep if I was a party to such a thing. And I question how some of these people do it. "But let me bring it back to the point here, which is: In 2022, the feds clearly—I believe—were starting to poke around. And come 2023, I think Brian Tully's unit was desperate. Who was going to find out because of the coverage of the Read case? Could they make sure that Kate Peter got close enough to Netflix and Gretchen Voss so that they couldn't find out what was actually going on? And could the Birchmore cover-up be kept alive, even in light of the national spotlight? "When you think about it from that perspective—when you think about the fact that some people may not have been loyal to the Justice for John O'Keefe movement, but were instead primarily loyal to Brian Tully's unit. And when you think about the fact that maybe Tully's unit didn't run the best investigation on Karen Read—maybe there were some flaws. But if you think about the fact that they did get her. But if you think about it in the context that Karen knew from the jump that the MSP were dirty over Birchmore, then you understand why it was going to become an incident. Everyone knew—everyone around Tully, his friends, all of them, the unit—they knew they covered up Birchmore's murder. And they knew Karen had it in her hands if she could just figure out the PR. And that's exactly what she did to put enough pressure on them. They took her to trial anyway, and it destroyed the fucking Norfolk DA. It destroyed Brian Tully's unit. It cost them dearly, and she's a tactical fucking genius. "I'm fully of the opinion that Karen Read staged a fake falling out with Natalie so that Natalie would get in the orbit of the MSP in June, July, and August of 2023 and feed information back to Karen. Likewise, I think Brian Tully thought he was slicker than he was by using the criminal prosecution of Aidan Kearney—not to get a genuinely, in my opinion, bad guy who was deserving of the indictment handed up by a grand jury of his peers. But because Tully wanted to know what the real target of the federal probe is. "If you don't know what a backhand is, folks, a backhand is where you investigate one thing on the surface, because you're dealing with a very, very high-level operation like the state police, who are a paramilitary intelligence-gathering operation. So you trick them. You make them think they're under investigation for John's death and the investigation of that death, but really you're investigating them for the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. And that's exactly what I think happened to this unit. That's what I think Brian Tully was trying to figure out from August of 2023 until about December. I think they eventually put it together, and by August of 2024, Matthew Farwell got wind of it and died. "Now it's a question of all this as a result of today. I want to be very clear: This is what was called for. There needed to be an independent voice with power—who takes no nonsense—who came into this and said, "Nope, it's out of your hands." And that's what Judge Doolin did today. The exposure potential—someone just needed to not be involved with Karen Read, Kearney, or the Norfolk DA, or Kate Peter or Marty Kraft, and prosecute this. Now, all those other witnesses, I have no idea what the hell is going to happen there, but at least for Lindsey Gaetani, Judge Doolin said, 'enough of this nonsense.'"

Grant Smith Ellis

21,114 次观看 • 10 个月前