Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Jane Street quant just stole and fit a $40-million trading brain inside a box that costs $4,000 and quietly walked out of the building with it. It's the new AMD Ryzen AI Halo. Eleven weeks later, that computer has made him $400,000 - from his bedroom. His wallet: The... model doesn't guess where Bitcoin goes. It simulates it. Every five minutes it reads the candle into a pattern net - break of structure, order blocks, the gaps where liquidity hides. Then it hands that read to MiroFish: a simulation that runs the next five minutes forward thousands of times, sorts every path into three outcomes - bear, neutral, breakout and threads the median straight through them. That median is where price actually lands. Not where the crowd hopes. When that fair value drifts 15¢ off the live book, the edge is real. It sizes by Kelly and fires. One button, no nerves. On the firm's cluster, one simulation like that ate serious hardware. The Halo box - 128GB of unified memory, a 200B model held whole, runs thousands a minute, offline, while he sleeps. No cloud. No login the firm can kill. The desk still owns the model. It just can't aim it where he aims it - Polymarket's too small for a fund that size to touch. He took the edge home. Two clicks and you trade right beside it:show more

cvxv666

10,460 subscribers

94,183 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

A 31-year-old blitz chess master who never cracked the top 100 just turned $500 into $153,279 - with Claude and simulation engine. Twenty years reading a board faster than the other guy, for prize pools that barely covered the flights. Then he pointed that speed at Polymarket. His wallet: No tournament ever paid him like a Claude agent running 24/7. Everyone trades Bitcoin like it mean-reverts on the 5-minute. It doesn't. That gap is the whole edge. Here's the stack. Every five minutes a BTC candle closes. A Claude agent reads it into a pattern net - price, momentum, volume in; BOS, order block, FVG out. A neuron fires. It doesn't trade yet. It hands off to MiroFish - a relationship-graph sim that threads a median path through three live clusters: bear, neutral prime, catalyst. That path is where BTC actually lands. Fair value drifts 15¢ off the order book? That's the edge. Size by Kelly. Pull the trigger. Read the candle. Fire the net. Run the graph. No thesis. No conviction. It never stops sharpening, re-running the graph every few seconds, rewriting its own threshold nightly. 92% of Polymarket traders lose. The winners are bots. This one just reads two endpoints and presses one button. 13,290 times. The edge is on-chain. Read it with this bot before it gets crowded:

A 31-year-old blitz chess master who never cracked the top 100 just turned $500 into $153,279 - with Claude and simulation engine. Twenty years reading a board faster than the other guy, for prize pools that barely covered the flights. Then he pointed that speed at Polymarket. His wallet: No tournament ever paid him like a Claude agent running 24/7. Everyone trades Bitcoin like it mean-reverts on the 5-minute. It doesn't. That gap is the whole edge. Here's the stack. Every five minutes a BTC candle closes. A Claude agent reads it into a pattern net - price, momentum, volume in; BOS, order block, FVG out. A neuron fires. It doesn't trade yet. It hands off to MiroFish - a relationship-graph sim that threads a median path through three live clusters: bear, neutral prime, catalyst. That path is where BTC actually lands. Fair value drifts 15¢ off the order book? That's the edge. Size by Kelly. Pull the trigger. Read the candle. Fire the net. Run the graph. No thesis. No conviction. It never stops sharpening, re-running the graph every few seconds, rewriting its own threshold nightly. 92% of Polymarket traders lose. The winners are bots. This one just reads two endpoints and presses one button. 13,290 times. The edge is on-chain. Read it with this bot before it gets crowded:

cvxv666

39,843 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

AMD JUST KILLED THE $200 - A - MONTH AI SUBSCRIPTION - A 65-WATT BOX WITH 128GB OF UNIFIED MEMORY THAT RUNS 70B MODELS LOCALLY. that clip is amd's ryzen ai max+ 395 mini box, held up on stage. the whole pitch is one spec: 128gb of high-speed unified memory. why it matters: cpu, gpu and npu share the same 128gb pool, so a model that used to need a rack of vram just fits. what it actually runs: llama 70b in full precision on the built-in gpu open models up to ~100b parameters, locally, no cloud all of it in a mini pc pulling around 65 watts that's the part that ends the subscription: your prompts, your data, your model, on a box on your desk, not metered by the token. honest line: this runs open models, not gpt-5 or claude opus. for chat, coding help and agents on your own data it's more than enough. for the absolute frontier, the cloud still wins. and it isn't free: the box runs ~$1,500 and up. but that's a few months of a $200 sub, then it's yours forever. no monthly ai bill, no tokens metered, no prompt leaving the room. the uncomfortable part isn't that amd made a fast box. it's that "you need the cloud for ai" was a pricing choice, and unified memory just made it optional. follow RetroChainer for the hardware that turns rent into ownership, and bookmark this before your next ai renewal.

AMD JUST KILLED THE $200 - A - MONTH AI SUBSCRIPTION - A 65-WATT BOX WITH 128GB OF UNIFIED MEMORY THAT RUNS 70B MODELS LOCALLY. that clip is amd's ryzen ai max+ 395 mini box, held up on stage. the whole pitch is one spec: 128gb of high-speed unified memory. why it matters: cpu, gpu and npu share the same 128gb pool, so a model that used to need a rack of vram just fits. what it actually runs: llama 70b in full precision on the built-in gpu open models up to ~100b parameters, locally, no cloud all of it in a mini pc pulling around 65 watts that's the part that ends the subscription: your prompts, your data, your model, on a box on your desk, not metered by the token. honest line: this runs open models, not gpt-5 or claude opus. for chat, coding help and agents on your own data it's more than enough. for the absolute frontier, the cloud still wins. and it isn't free: the box runs ~$1,500 and up. but that's a few months of a $200 sub, then it's yours forever. no monthly ai bill, no tokens metered, no prompt leaving the room. the uncomfortable part isn't that amd made a fast box. it's that "you need the cloud for ai" was a pricing choice, and unified memory just made it optional. follow RetroChainer for the hardware that turns rent into ownership, and bookmark this before your next ai renewal.

RetroChainer

16,995 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Fired Jane Street quant walked out with ten years of private BTC trading data - and turned it into $1.5M He didn't build a bot. He built a simulator that sees the matrix - it runs every move Bitcoin can make before it makes one. His wallet: Here's what he actually built. A swarm of agents feeds ten years of stolen tick data into MiroFish - a god-tier agentic simulator. It doesn't forecast the next candle. It spins up a virtual market and plays Bitcoin forward through thousands of scenarios at once. Six agents each validate their own call. A trade only fires when they converge. They collect data 24/7, re-run the sim, and remember every pattern, every reaction, every signal they've ever seen. He doesn't predict the future. The math already knows it. He just reads the numbers and takes the money. I've been copying him for a week and PnL prints like a money printer on steroids. Here's the part the firms don't want public: MiroFish just broke algo trading. The desks are quietly building their own simulators right now. The window where one solo wallet can run this is still open - barely. Save this and build your own - or skip the homework and copy his with this bot:

Fired Jane Street quant walked out with ten years of private BTC trading data - and turned it into $1.5M He didn't build a bot. He built a simulator that sees the matrix - it runs every move Bitcoin can make before it makes one. His wallet: Here's what he actually built. A swarm of agents feeds ten years of stolen tick data into MiroFish - a god-tier agentic simulator. It doesn't forecast the next candle. It spins up a virtual market and plays Bitcoin forward through thousands of scenarios at once. Six agents each validate their own call. A trade only fires when they converge. They collect data 24/7, re-run the sim, and remember every pattern, every reaction, every signal they've ever seen. He doesn't predict the future. The math already knows it. He just reads the numbers and takes the money. I've been copying him for a week and PnL prints like a money printer on steroids. Here's the part the firms don't want public: MiroFish just broke algo trading. The desks are quietly building their own simulators right now. The window where one solo wallet can run this is still open - barely. Save this and build your own - or skip the homework and copy his with this bot:

cvxv666

132,166 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A quantum physicist lost his funding last year. He's since pulled $487,000 off Polymarket - with the math his grant was supposed to pay for. He doesn't predict where Bitcoin goes. He reads whether it's pinned in place right now - or free to run. His profile: The lab went dark. He went home with a decade of math and nothing to point it at. Here's the system. He feeds the last few hundred 5-minute BTC prints into TimesFM - Google's foundation model for time series. It hands back a distribution of where price goes next, using only what's known up to this second. No peeking at tomorrow. Then MiroFish turns that into a map. Every recent moment becomes a point on a surface. Red where price is being pulled back to equilibrium - something's holding it. Blue where it's broken free and the path can run. The points cluster: > Red pools into regions that act like a containment field > Blue pools where the structure let go The flip between them isn't gradual. It's a phase transition. That's the whole edge. It answers the only question a 5-minute candle asks: mean reversion, or momentum? He's not guessing which regime is next - he's reading which one is already live. Red, he fades the move. Blue, he rides it. Finding order in noise was his whole career. The market just pays for it directly. The bot's live right now, reading whether this candle is held or running. Two clicks and its trades land in your wallet too:

cvxv666

36,161 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Citadel quant quit and walked out with one thing fund never lets leave the building: 120-year-old math that sees a market crash before the chart does. Every big desk runs it. None of them explain it. He turned it into an HMM bot running BTC 5min markets and made $570,000. It switches strategy the second the regime flips and cuts everything the moment panic spikes. His wallet: Full breakdown below. Here's what they actually see. You look at a Bitcoin chart and see a price. A quant sees three states: bull, bear, sideways. The market's always in one. The only question that pays is which one comes next. That's the math. It's called a Markov chain, and it runs on one rule: where price goes next depends only on where it is now. You count how often each state flips to another and drop it into a grid. That grid is a map of the market. Now the part that feels illegal. Want the odds of a crash twelve steps out? You multiply that grid by itself twelve times. One line of math, and you've got the probability of every future state. Then it acts: run the trend when calm, flip to mean reversion in chop, cut everything when panic odds spike. It doesn't predict the future. It gives you the odds of every version of it, then sizes the bet to match. That's the edge. Renaissance ran 66% a year for 30 years on math like this. You can build the basic version in a weekend. Bookmark & read this before it gets buried.

Citadel quant quit and walked out with one thing fund never lets leave the building: 120-year-old math that sees a market crash before the chart does. Every big desk runs it. None of them explain it. He turned it into an HMM bot running BTC 5min markets and made $570,000. It switches strategy the second the regime flips and cuts everything the moment panic spikes. His wallet: Full breakdown below. Here's what they actually see. You look at a Bitcoin chart and see a price. A quant sees three states: bull, bear, sideways. The market's always in one. The only question that pays is which one comes next. That's the math. It's called a Markov chain, and it runs on one rule: where price goes next depends only on where it is now. You count how often each state flips to another and drop it into a grid. That grid is a map of the market. Now the part that feels illegal. Want the odds of a crash twelve steps out? You multiply that grid by itself twelve times. One line of math, and you've got the probability of every future state. Then it acts: run the trend when calm, flip to mean reversion in chop, cut everything when panic odds spike. It doesn't predict the future. It gives you the odds of every version of it, then sizes the bet to match. That's the edge. Renaissance ran 66% a year for 30 years on math like this. You can build the basic version in a weekend. Bookmark & read this before it gets buried.

cvxv666

93,826 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Orchestrators vs. Graphs, clearly explained! orchestrators are great, and everyone builds one first. here is the ceiling: an orchestrator sits above the work and routes every message. five agents report to it. it reads all five. it decides what each one does next, and reads all five replies. that is ten trips through one context, and by the fifth agent that context has read four reports, five instructions and its own reasoning about all of them. Graph engineering fixes this by removing the seat: not a better router, but no router at all. you need both, and here is the sentence that resolves the whole confusion: an orchestrator sits above the work and holds all of it. a graph is the shape of the work, and holds none of it. ↳ above the work: one context that has to see everything before anything ships ↳ inside the work: a splitter that hands out and lets go, and a merge that reads nothing Prompts → Context → Harness → Loops → Graphs the coordination did not disappear. it moved into the edges, where it costs nothing and cannot get tired. the trick is noticing what you actually built. if one node has to see every result before the run can finish, you did not remove the bottleneck. you hired it, gave it the longest context in the system, and made it the thing you were counting on to stay sharp. one thing to know before you scale it. an orchestrator degrades in the one way nothing catches. ↳ it does not crash, time out or return an error. it stays up and keeps routing ↳ it just starts routing worse, somewhere around the fifth report, and every downstream agent does exactly what it was told that last one catches careful people. you can have perfect isolation on every worker and still have one window quietly drifting at the top, and the traces will all look clean because each worker did its job. and the one that eats whole nights: the merge is where this shows up first. ranking five findings is not judgment, it is a sort. if a model is doing it, you are paying a model to read five reports so it can put them in an order that three lines of code would have got right, and now that model has read everything too. below i have quoted my full guide on graph engineering. it covers the three topologies, the verifier patterns, and where the gate should actually open. save this and read it below ↓

Orchestrators vs. Graphs, clearly explained! orchestrators are great, and everyone builds one first. here is the ceiling: an orchestrator sits above the work and routes every message. five agents report to it. it reads all five. it decides what each one does next, and reads all five replies. that is ten trips through one context, and by the fifth agent that context has read four reports, five instructions and its own reasoning about all of them. Graph engineering fixes this by removing the seat: not a better router, but no router at all. you need both, and here is the sentence that resolves the whole confusion: an orchestrator sits above the work and holds all of it. a graph is the shape of the work, and holds none of it. ↳ above the work: one context that has to see everything before anything ships ↳ inside the work: a splitter that hands out and lets go, and a merge that reads nothing Prompts → Context → Harness → Loops → Graphs the coordination did not disappear. it moved into the edges, where it costs nothing and cannot get tired. the trick is noticing what you actually built. if one node has to see every result before the run can finish, you did not remove the bottleneck. you hired it, gave it the longest context in the system, and made it the thing you were counting on to stay sharp. one thing to know before you scale it. an orchestrator degrades in the one way nothing catches. ↳ it does not crash, time out or return an error. it stays up and keeps routing ↳ it just starts routing worse, somewhere around the fifth report, and every downstream agent does exactly what it was told that last one catches careful people. you can have perfect isolation on every worker and still have one window quietly drifting at the top, and the traces will all look clean because each worker did its job. and the one that eats whole nights: the merge is where this shows up first. ranking five findings is not judgment, it is a sort. if a model is doing it, you are paying a model to read five reports so it can put them in an order that three lines of code would have got right, and now that model has read everything too. below i have quoted my full guide on graph engineering. it covers the three topologies, the verifier patterns, and where the gate should actually open. save this and read it below ↓

Hanako

44,226 просмотров • 18 дней назад

US export-control disable Claude Fable 5 overnight. Not for what it said - for what one trader did with it. He turned an $11,000 wreck into $300,000 profit in five days. Then they pulled Claude Fable 5 from public hands. Too late - his bot's still running. His wallet: Every other Claude model still works. The two best ones don't. Anthropic's calling it a misunderstanding. Maybe. But think about what gets a model killed by export control overnight, no warning. Here's what Fable 5 actually did for him. It doesn't predict price. It computes the whole probability surface of a market - every outcome, weighted, faster than the market can correct itself. It finds the bets the crowd writes off as impossible, runs the real math, and buys them for pennies when the math disagrees. One of those just paid x205. A regular guy, a model this sharp, a market no regulator polices. They closed that door overnight - one night too late. He's holding one of the last builds that ever touched a live market. It's still on Polymarket right now, hunting the same mispriced tails. Fable 5 is locked. The algorithm it wrote is loose. You can't open the model anymore. You can still copy the wallet it built in two clicks:

US export-control disable Claude Fable 5 overnight. Not for what it said - for what one trader did with it. He turned an $11,000 wreck into $300,000 profit in five days. Then they pulled Claude Fable 5 from public hands. Too late - his bot's still running. His wallet: Every other Claude model still works. The two best ones don't. Anthropic's calling it a misunderstanding. Maybe. But think about what gets a model killed by export control overnight, no warning. Here's what Fable 5 actually did for him. It doesn't predict price. It computes the whole probability surface of a market - every outcome, weighted, faster than the market can correct itself. It finds the bets the crowd writes off as impossible, runs the real math, and buys them for pennies when the math disagrees. One of those just paid x205. A regular guy, a model this sharp, a market no regulator polices. They closed that door overnight - one night too late. He's holding one of the last builds that ever touched a live market. It's still on Polymarket right now, hunting the same mispriced tails. Fable 5 is locked. The algorithm it wrote is loose. You can't open the model anymore. You can still copy the wallet it built in two clicks:

cvxv666

77,366 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Anthropic engineer just built a second brain that reads 3 files instead of 5,000, and cut the token bill 40% no orchestrator, no plugin, just a router file, an index, and code that scores before the model ever opens anything point claude at a flat folder of notes and every question reads all of them, that’s the default and it’s expensive this breakdown turns that exact pattern into a system anyone can run CLAUDE.md → index.md → nodes → edges → retrieval as code → memory → ship it twelve steps, one shared rule, evidence lives in the index, the model reads three files while the notes folder still holds thousands the stale index test, one line drifts and the whole graph quietly turns back into the pile it was built to escape, no exceptions save it and watch, then read the article below

Anthropic engineer just built a second brain that reads 3 files instead of 5,000, and cut the token bill 40% no orchestrator, no plugin, just a router file, an index, and code that scores before the model ever opens anything point claude at a flat folder of notes and every question reads all of them, that’s the default and it’s expensive this breakdown turns that exact pattern into a system anyone can run CLAUDE.md → index.md → nodes → edges → retrieval as code → memory → ship it twelve steps, one shared rule, evidence lives in the index, the model reads three files while the notes folder still holds thousands the stale index test, one line drifts and the whole graph quietly turns back into the pile it was built to escape, no exceptions save it and watch, then read the article below

leopardracer

37,304 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

you numbered the steps so it could not get lost it does not get lost that list was written for a model that wandered, and this one plans better than the list does, so every number you added is a place where it is no longer allowed, to be smarter than you state the goal, the constraints, and how you will know it worked keep the numbers only where exactly one sequence is safe, which is deletes, auth and compliance the procedure felt like rigour it is a cage built to the dimensions of a model that is not in the room

you numbered the steps so it could not get lost it does not get lost that list was written for a model that wandered, and this one plans better than the list does, so every number you added is a place where it is no longer allowed, to be smarter than you state the goal, the constraints, and how you will know it worked keep the numbers only where exactly one sequence is safe, which is deletes, auth and compliance the procedure felt like rigour it is a cage built to the dimensions of a model that is not in the room

Lagosaur

14,857 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist of OpenAI: "The better a neural network can predict the next word, the more it understands it." Everyone calls it autocomplete. Ilya explained why that is a comforting lie. To guess the final word of a murder mystery, the name of the killer, the model has to reason through every clue in the book. Prediction that good is not statistics. It is understanding. Then he said the part that should stop you. The text these models train on is "a projection of the world," and to compress it they learn more and more about people, "the human condition, their hopes, dreams, and motivations." The machine is not memorizing our words. It is quietly building a model of us. That is the whole premise of the fear. The machine will never hate you. It understands you far better than that. The frightening variable was never the intelligence. It was the aim. I wrote the full story: the one fear about AI everyone gets wrong, and the one already here.

Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist of OpenAI: "The better a neural network can predict the next word, the more it understands it." Everyone calls it autocomplete. Ilya explained why that is a comforting lie. To guess the final word of a murder mystery, the name of the killer, the model has to reason through every clue in the book. Prediction that good is not statistics. It is understanding. Then he said the part that should stop you. The text these models train on is "a projection of the world," and to compress it they learn more and more about people, "the human condition, their hopes, dreams, and motivations." The machine is not memorizing our words. It is quietly building a model of us. That is the whole premise of the fear. The machine will never hate you. It understands you far better than that. The frightening variable was never the intelligence. It was the aim. I wrote the full story: the one fear about AI everyone gets wrong, and the one already here.

Casper

92,361 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A finance professor manages $200M with AI agents, and he told everyone why: "Large language models are at the level of a fourth-year PhD student in every field" Alejandro Lopez-Lira's AI fund, Autopilot, returned 56% last year. The S&P did 16%. There are 52,000 people with money in it, and most of them just watch the machine work. What he automated is the same six-step loop every fund on earth runs: find an idea, code it, backtest it, deploy it, read the autopsy, learn from it. A quant at Two Sigma runs that loop once a month, and the salary time alone costs around $50,000 per hypothesis. All steps from this loop now fit in AI trading text box. Plain English in, executable strategy out, five-year backtest in 12 seconds, live on a broker 90 seconds after you typed the sentence. He runs $200M with AI. You can run same AI fund in two clicks, free to try: Step 6 on this loop is where everyone is stuck. Your agent has no memory. Every strategy it kills goes into a log nobody reads, and the next one starts from zero. Nobody keeps negative results. Not Citadel, not Man Group, not a single repo on GitHub. Fix that and the agent remembers every hypothesis it killed and the regime it died in. It stops burning cycles on your old mistakes. Jane Street pays 3,500 people to run this cycle and made $39.6 billion doing it. Five sixths of it is now free. Bookmark & read full map of this loop in the article below. Most people still think AI trading is out of reach for them - it isn't. Don't want to spend a dollar for testing this? Kalshi just opened a perps exchange and gives US users $25 free to start ->

A finance professor manages $200M with AI agents, and he told everyone why: "Large language models are at the level of a fourth-year PhD student in every field" Alejandro Lopez-Lira's AI fund, Autopilot, returned 56% last year. The S&P did 16%. There are 52,000 people with money in it, and most of them just watch the machine work. What he automated is the same six-step loop every fund on earth runs: find an idea, code it, backtest it, deploy it, read the autopsy, learn from it. A quant at Two Sigma runs that loop once a month, and the salary time alone costs around $50,000 per hypothesis. All steps from this loop now fit in AI trading text box. Plain English in, executable strategy out, five-year backtest in 12 seconds, live on a broker 90 seconds after you typed the sentence. He runs $200M with AI. You can run same AI fund in two clicks, free to try: Step 6 on this loop is where everyone is stuck. Your agent has no memory. Every strategy it kills goes into a log nobody reads, and the next one starts from zero. Nobody keeps negative results. Not Citadel, not Man Group, not a single repo on GitHub. Fix that and the agent remembers every hypothesis it killed and the regime it died in. It stops burning cycles on your old mistakes. Jane Street pays 3,500 people to run this cycle and made $39.6 billion doing it. Five sixths of it is now free. Bookmark & read full map of this loop in the article below. Most people still think AI trading is out of reach for them - it isn't. Don't want to spend a dollar for testing this? Kalshi just opened a perps exchange and gives US users $25 free to start ->

cvxv666

83,134 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A casino once paid a magician to test their shuffling machine. He took it apart, learned to predict the cards, and they buried his findings on purpose. His name is Persi Diaconis. He was a professional magician before he became a Stanford mathematician, which is exactly why the casino should have been careful. The company had built an automatic shuffler and hired him to confirm it was random. He pulled it apart, found the hidden order it left in the deck, and started calling cards before they landed. Their response was not to fix it. It was to shelve it. They told him plainly they would not use that machine, and the reason was almost funny. A perfectly random shuffle would cost the house its edge. They never wanted fair. They wanted controlled. That work led him to a number almost nobody knows. Seven. A deck of 52 cards is not random after one shuffle, or three, or five. It stays secretly ordered until the seventh riffle shuffle. Six is not enough. Seven is the wall where the pattern finally dies. Most people shuffle three or four times and deal. That deck still remembers the order it came in, and if you know what to look for, you can read it. The overhand shuffle, the lazy one where you peel cards off the top, is far worse. To truly randomize a deck that way takes thousands of tiny passes. Almost no one on Earth does it right. Your gut reads a couple of shuffles as random enough. Wrong. Random has an exact price, and the price is seven, and almost everyone pays less and calls it fair. The video is free and runs seven minutes. Almost everyone who has ever held a deck has been doing it wrong, and never once suspected the number that would fix it. I post one of these every week. The things everyone touches and no one actually understands.

A casino once paid a magician to test their shuffling machine. He took it apart, learned to predict the cards, and they buried his findings on purpose. His name is Persi Diaconis. He was a professional magician before he became a Stanford mathematician, which is exactly why the casino should have been careful. The company had built an automatic shuffler and hired him to confirm it was random. He pulled it apart, found the hidden order it left in the deck, and started calling cards before they landed. Their response was not to fix it. It was to shelve it. They told him plainly they would not use that machine, and the reason was almost funny. A perfectly random shuffle would cost the house its edge. They never wanted fair. They wanted controlled. That work led him to a number almost nobody knows. Seven. A deck of 52 cards is not random after one shuffle, or three, or five. It stays secretly ordered until the seventh riffle shuffle. Six is not enough. Seven is the wall where the pattern finally dies. Most people shuffle three or four times and deal. That deck still remembers the order it came in, and if you know what to look for, you can read it. The overhand shuffle, the lazy one where you peel cards off the top, is far worse. To truly randomize a deck that way takes thousands of tiny passes. Almost no one on Earth does it right. Your gut reads a couple of shuffles as random enough. Wrong. Random has an exact price, and the price is seven, and almost everyone pays less and calls it fair. The video is free and runs seven minutes. Almost everyone who has ever held a deck has been doing it wrong, and never once suspected the number that would fix it. I post one of these every week. The things everyone touches and no one actually understands.

Zyron

86,465 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Citadel fired their best quant. He rebuilt their entire algo with Claude Fable 5 in 48 hours - and he's up $430,000 trading it against them. He didn't take a single file. He didn't need to - ten years of that logic lived in his head, and you can't raid a memory. Wallet proof: Here's the engine MiroFish runs - and it's rigged in his favor. Picture a Galton board: a ball dropping through eight rows of pegs, bouncing left or right at random. One ball is chaos. Thousands of balls always fall into the same bell curve. That's the law he weaponized. Every ball is one trade. Each row is a volatility gate - news, liquidations, order-book flow, things nobody controls. On a fair board every gate is a 50/50 coin flip. His model tilts each one to 0.54 - four cents of edge that only shows up when fair value splits from the book. Four cents sounds like nothing. Compound it through eight gates, thirty-two thousand times, and the whole bell shifts right of breakeven: 71% of trades land green. $93 of edge per trade. $430k across the distance. Watch the win rate converge in real time - it swings between 50 and 85% for the first few dozen trades, then locks on 0.71 and never leaves. He doesn't predict a single trade. One trade is a coin flip. Eighteen thousand is mathematics. They thought firing him protected the edge. They just handed it a grudge. Copy the wallet quietly out-trading a $60B fund before they connect the dots:

Citadel fired their best quant. He rebuilt their entire algo with Claude Fable 5 in 48 hours - and he's up $430,000 trading it against them. He didn't take a single file. He didn't need to - ten years of that logic lived in his head, and you can't raid a memory. Wallet proof: Here's the engine MiroFish runs - and it's rigged in his favor. Picture a Galton board: a ball dropping through eight rows of pegs, bouncing left or right at random. One ball is chaos. Thousands of balls always fall into the same bell curve. That's the law he weaponized. Every ball is one trade. Each row is a volatility gate - news, liquidations, order-book flow, things nobody controls. On a fair board every gate is a 50/50 coin flip. His model tilts each one to 0.54 - four cents of edge that only shows up when fair value splits from the book. Four cents sounds like nothing. Compound it through eight gates, thirty-two thousand times, and the whole bell shifts right of breakeven: 71% of trades land green. $93 of edge per trade. $430k across the distance. Watch the win rate converge in real time - it swings between 50 and 85% for the first few dozen trades, then locks on 0.71 and never leaves. He doesn't predict a single trade. One trade is a coin flip. Eighteen thousand is mathematics. They thought firing him protected the edge. They just handed it a grudge. Copy the wallet quietly out-trading a $60B fund before they connect the dots:

cvxv666

2,464,434 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ChatGPT can write you a thousand trading strategies from one sentence. 999 will quietly bleed your account dry. Every single one of them looks like a winner. One method pulls the real one out. Quant desks have run it for years. It's called loop engineering. It's not a smarter prompt. It's a loop: generate a strategy, test it, score why it failed, feed that back, and run it again until one survives data it has never seen. Man Group runs $150 billion. They built an AI that writes and tests hundreds of strategies a week. And second agent whose only job is to hunt the ones that secretly overfit and kill them before a cent goes live. > describe an idea -> backtest 5 years in 12 seconds > read why it died -> feed that back in > run it again until one survives data it never saw AI can write a thousand strategies. Loop engineering is the only thing that tells you which one was ever real. 89% of retail lost money in 2025. Almost none of it from bad ideas. All of it from trading the first guess and never running it through backtest loop. Horizon just put the whole thing in a chat box, free while the beta's open: You're not losing to smarter traders. You're losing to the ones who opened the tab. Anyone can generate a strategy now. Almost no one runs the loop that proves it. That gap is the whole edge. You'll mean to check it later. Later is a "waitlist closed" page.

ChatGPT can write you a thousand trading strategies from one sentence. 999 will quietly bleed your account dry. Every single one of them looks like a winner. One method pulls the real one out. Quant desks have run it for years. It's called loop engineering. It's not a smarter prompt. It's a loop: generate a strategy, test it, score why it failed, feed that back, and run it again until one survives data it has never seen. Man Group runs $150 billion. They built an AI that writes and tests hundreds of strategies a week. And second agent whose only job is to hunt the ones that secretly overfit and kill them before a cent goes live. > describe an idea -> backtest 5 years in 12 seconds > read why it died -> feed that back in > run it again until one survives data it never saw AI can write a thousand strategies. Loop engineering is the only thing that tells you which one was ever real. 89% of retail lost money in 2025. Almost none of it from bad ideas. All of it from trading the first guess and never running it through backtest loop. Horizon just put the whole thing in a chat box, free while the beta's open: You're not losing to smarter traders. You're losing to the ones who opened the tab. Anyone can generate a strategy now. Almost no one runs the loop that proves it. That gap is the whole edge. You'll mean to check it later. Later is a "waitlist closed" page.

cvxv666

174,699 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Someone just posted the full blueprint for an AI swarm that does the job of a 200-person quant research team. Six agents. Running 24/7. Finding brand-new alpha while you sleep. Citadel needs 100 PhDs to do this. Two Sigma needs 200. This does it with six bots and one laptop. Two ways to play this - spend a weekend building your own swarm, or copy the wallet of one that's already up $2M: Boris Cherny runs Claude Code at Anthropic. Two weeks ago he said: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops" Alpha research is just a pipeline. So instead of sitting in it, you hand each stage to its own agent: > one reads every new research paper overnight and pulls out the trade idea > one builds the features and cleans the data > one backtests it over 20 years, costs and slippage included > one runs the hard stats and kills anything overfit > one checks it still works in every market regime > one strips out plain momentum and value to see if any real edge is left Each of those six is a job a fund pays a $600,000-a-year quant to do. He runs all six for the price of an API bill. The rule that makes it work: the agent that builds a signal never gets to approve it. A separate, stronger agent tries to kill it first. Whatever survives all six by morning is real, new alpha. One trader's already running this exact swarm on Polymarket. That $2M wallet is public, every trade on-chain. The full build is in the post below - six agents, the tool that runs them, and the five mistakes that kill most people. Bookmark & read this before it's buried.

cvxv666

104,237 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

$FOUR BOXES ON A DESK ARE NOW A FRONTIER AI CLUSTER This is four NVIDIA DGX Spark units wired together, sitting on a single desk and running Qwen3-235B end to end. Each box holds 128GB of unified memory. Stacked together, that is half a terabyte of memory pooled across the cluster, all from hardware you could fit in a backpack. A year ago a setup like this lived in a data center behind a badge reader. Now it runs next to a monitor and a coffee cup. Here is the part people get wrong. The four boxes do not magically merge into one giant GPU. The model is sharded across all of them, and they pass data over a fast link while every box does its slice of the work. That is the whole trick. No single box could hold a 235B model, but split four ways, it runs. The machines stay quiet and barely warm while doing it, sipping a fraction of the power a rack of server GPUs would burn. The wall between you and a frontier-class model used to be a cloud bill. Now it is just desk space. Bookmark this & Watch it run ↓$

FOUR BOXES ON A DESK ARE NOW A FRONTIER AI CLUSTER This is four NVIDIA DGX Spark units wired together, sitting on a single desk and running Qwen3-235B end to end. Each box holds 128GB of unified memory. Stacked together, that is half a terabyte of memory pooled across the cluster, all from hardware you could fit in a backpack. A year ago a setup like this lived in a data center behind a badge reader. Now it runs next to a monitor and a coffee cup. Here is the part people get wrong. The four boxes do not magically merge into one giant GPU. The model is sharded across all of them, and they pass data over a fast link while every box does its slice of the work. That is the whole trick. No single box could hold a 235B model, but split four ways, it runs. The machines stay quiet and barely warm while doing it, sipping a fraction of the power a rack of server GPUs would burn. The wall between you and a frontier-class model used to be a cloud bill. Now it is just desk space. Bookmark this & Watch it run ↓

slash1s

19,473 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

IF YOU ARE STILL PROMPTING BY HAND IN 2026 YOU ARE ALREADY BEHIND the guy who built Claude Code at Anthropic said he stopped writing prompts a long time ago he runs loops instead, systems that write the prompts for him and keep working while he sleeps you type one request at a time and wait for the answer he built a machine that fires hundreds of requests, checks its own output and fixes itself with no hands on the keyboard here is how you make the jump step 1 stop treating the model like a chat box and start treating it like a worker you manage step 2 write a loop that takes a goal, breaks it into tasks and sends each one to the model on its own step 3 add a second pass where the model grades its own work and retries whatever failed step 4 let it run on a timer so it keeps shipping while you are away from the screen the person still typing prompts one by one is doing the work of a intern the person running loops is doing the work of a whole team off one laptop prompting was never the skill, building the system that prompts for you is

IF YOU ARE STILL PROMPTING BY HAND IN 2026 YOU ARE ALREADY BEHIND the guy who built Claude Code at Anthropic said he stopped writing prompts a long time ago he runs loops instead, systems that write the prompts for him and keep working while he sleeps you type one request at a time and wait for the answer he built a machine that fires hundreds of requests, checks its own output and fixes itself with no hands on the keyboard here is how you make the jump step 1 stop treating the model like a chat box and start treating it like a worker you manage step 2 write a loop that takes a goal, breaks it into tasks and sends each one to the model on its own step 3 add a second pass where the model grades its own work and retries whatever failed step 4 let it run on a timer so it keeps shipping while you are away from the screen the person still typing prompts one by one is doing the work of a intern the person running loops is doing the work of a whole team off one laptop prompting was never the skill, building the system that prompts for you is

Atlas

16,641 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

i'm running a 397 billion parameter model on a amd ai max box that sits on my desk and pulls less power than a gaming laptop. the model is Nex-N2-Pro, 397B-A17B, the open weight release people are putting next to gpt-5.5 on coding. i have it quantized to IQ1_M, 1.75 bits per weight, 90gb of weights loaded into the 128gb of unified memory on amd's strix halo igpu. watch the gpu in this recording. it spikes, it sustains, it does not fall over. that is the part the spec sheets never show you, not just that a 400b model loads, but that an integrated graphics chip holds the load and generates token after token, stable, no crash, no thermal cliff. and it is not a slideshow. roughly 18 tokens a second, faster than you can read. a frontier scale model producing usable output, fully local. no datacenter, no rented h100s, no api key, no permission. three years ago a model this size meant a server room and a budget to match. tonight it is a quiet box on my desk. this is the accessible tier almost nobody benchmarks honestly, and it is further along than the timeline thinks. the full breakdown is coming, rocm vs vulkan on this chip, and this little amd box head to head against the nvidia equivalent. stay tuned.

i'm running a 397 billion parameter model on a amd ai max box that sits on my desk and pulls less power than a gaming laptop. the model is Nex-N2-Pro, 397B-A17B, the open weight release people are putting next to gpt-5.5 on coding. i have it quantized to IQ1_M, 1.75 bits per weight, 90gb of weights loaded into the 128gb of unified memory on amd's strix halo igpu. watch the gpu in this recording. it spikes, it sustains, it does not fall over. that is the part the spec sheets never show you, not just that a 400b model loads, but that an integrated graphics chip holds the load and generates token after token, stable, no crash, no thermal cliff. and it is not a slideshow. roughly 18 tokens a second, faster than you can read. a frontier scale model producing usable output, fully local. no datacenter, no rented h100s, no api key, no permission. three years ago a model this size meant a server room and a budget to match. tonight it is a quiet box on my desk. this is the accessible tier almost nobody benchmarks honestly, and it is further along than the timeline thinks. the full breakdown is coming, rocm vs vulkan on this chip, and this little amd box head to head against the nvidia equivalent. stay tuned.

Sudo su

32,163 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A fired Jane Street quant walked out with 10 years of private BTC trading data. Turned it into $1.5M. He did not build a bot. He built a simulator that runs every move Bitcoin can make before it makes one. I found his wallet. Been copying him for a week. PnL prints like clockwork. Here is what he actually built. A swarm of agents feeds 10 years of stolen tick data into MiroFish. A god-tier agentic simulator. It does not forecast the next candle. It spins up a virtual market and plays Bitcoin forward through thousands of scenarios at once. Six agents each validate their own call. A trade only fires when they converge. They collect data 24/7, rerun the sim, and remember every pattern, every reaction, every signal they have ever seen. He does not predict the future. The math already knows it. He just reads the numbers and takes the money. Here is the part firms do not want public: MiroFish just broke algo trading. The desks are quietly building their own simulators right now. The window where one solo wallet can run this is still open. Barely. I rebuilt his approach using Claude. One prompt. Fed it the same framework. Let it run. The agent monitors his wallet 24/7. Copies every position in real-time. No delay. No guessing. Just mirror and profit. You only need Claude + device + 1 hour to deploy. Giving this free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word "QUANT" 2. Like and retweet this post 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar so I can DM you Save this post. Build the copytrading system this week. Start with $200. Scale on evidence.

A fired Jane Street quant walked out with 10 years of private BTC trading data. Turned it into $1.5M. He did not build a bot. He built a simulator that runs every move Bitcoin can make before it makes one. I found his wallet. Been copying him for a week. PnL prints like clockwork. Here is what he actually built. A swarm of agents feeds 10 years of stolen tick data into MiroFish. A god-tier agentic simulator. It does not forecast the next candle. It spins up a virtual market and plays Bitcoin forward through thousands of scenarios at once. Six agents each validate their own call. A trade only fires when they converge. They collect data 24/7, rerun the sim, and remember every pattern, every reaction, every signal they have ever seen. He does not predict the future. The math already knows it. He just reads the numbers and takes the money. Here is the part firms do not want public: MiroFish just broke algo trading. The desks are quietly building their own simulators right now. The window where one solo wallet can run this is still open. Barely. I rebuilt his approach using Claude. One prompt. Fed it the same framework. Let it run. The agent monitors his wallet 24/7. Copies every position in real-time. No delay. No guessing. Just mirror and profit. You only need Claude + device + 1 hour to deploy. Giving this free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word "QUANT" 2. Like and retweet this post 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar so I can DM you Save this post. Build the copytrading system this week. Start with $200. Scale on evidence.

Himanshu Kumar

63,769 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A finance professor manages $200M with AI agents, and he told everyone why: "Large language models are at the level of a fourth-year PhD student in every field" Alejandro Lopez-Lira's AI fund, Autopilot, returned 56% last year. The S&P did 16%. There are 52,000 people with money in it, and most of them just watch the machine work. What he automated is the same six-step loop every fund on earth runs: find an idea, code it, backtest it, deploy it, read the autopsy, learn from it. A quant at Two Sigma runs that loop once a month, and the salary time alone costs around $50,000 per hypothesis. All steps from this loop now fit in AI trading text box. Plain English in, executable strategy out, five-year backtest in 12 seconds, live on a broker 90 seconds after you typed the sentence. He runs $200M with AI. You can run same AI fund in two clicks, free to try: Step 6 on this loop is where everyone is stuck. Your agent has no memory. Every strategy it kills goes into a log nobody reads, and the next one starts from zero. Nobody keeps negative results. Not Citadel, not Man Group, not a single repo on GitHub. Fix that and the agent remembers every hypothesis it killed and the regime it died in. It stops burning cycles on your old mistakes. Jane Street pays 3,500 people to run this cycle and made $39.6 billion doing it. Five sixths of it is now free. Bookmark & read full map of this loop in the article below. Most people still think AI trading is out of reach for them - it isn't.

A finance professor manages $200M with AI agents, and he told everyone why: "Large language models are at the level of a fourth-year PhD student in every field" Alejandro Lopez-Lira's AI fund, Autopilot, returned 56% last year. The S&P did 16%. There are 52,000 people with money in it, and most of them just watch the machine work. What he automated is the same six-step loop every fund on earth runs: find an idea, code it, backtest it, deploy it, read the autopsy, learn from it. A quant at Two Sigma runs that loop once a month, and the salary time alone costs around $50,000 per hypothesis. All steps from this loop now fit in AI trading text box. Plain English in, executable strategy out, five-year backtest in 12 seconds, live on a broker 90 seconds after you typed the sentence. He runs $200M with AI. You can run same AI fund in two clicks, free to try: Step 6 on this loop is where everyone is stuck. Your agent has no memory. Every strategy it kills goes into a log nobody reads, and the next one starts from zero. Nobody keeps negative results. Not Citadel, not Man Group, not a single repo on GitHub. Fix that and the agent remembers every hypothesis it killed and the regime it died in. It stops burning cycles on your old mistakes. Jane Street pays 3,500 people to run this cycle and made $39.6 billion doing it. Five sixths of it is now free. Bookmark & read full map of this loop in the article below. Most people still think AI trading is out of reach for them - it isn't.

sopersone

48,482 просмотров • 24 дней назад