Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red on Trump threatening Canada with tariffs over the wildfires smoke... "It's the correct diagnosis, but it's the wrong prescription, right? Like, the President is right to call out Canadian officials. They have not taken this seriously enough. We are suffering as a direct result...

CurtisHouck's profile picture

Curtis Houck

125,977 subscribers

16,513 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 HOLY CRAP! After launching a DOJ investigation, President Trump calls out BY NAME oil companies for "price gouging" Americans at the pump "It's ExxonMobil, it's Chevron, it's Shell, it's BP, it's a lot of them!" "The oil prices have been coming down so much, and we are NOT seeing anything at the pump by comparison to what it should be. We should be, in my opinion, at $2.25 right now at the pump. And we're higher than that!" "And we are doing a big investigation on it, you know. They're not reducing the prices commensurate with what's happening. Look, we are sending out, think of it, 19 million barrels came out of it." "DON'T GOUGE OUR PEOPLE."
1:27

🚨 HOLY CRAP! After launching a DOJ investigation, President Trump calls out BY NAME oil companies for "price gouging" Americans at the pump "It's ExxonMobil, it's Chevron, it's Shell, it's BP, it's a lot of them!" "The oil prices have been coming down so much, and we are NOT seeing anything at the pump by comparison to what it should be. We should be, in my opinion, at $2.25 right now at the pump. And we're higher than that!" "And we are doing a big investigation on it, you know. They're not reducing the prices commensurate with what's happening. Look, we are sending out, think of it, 19 million barrels came out of it." "DON'T GOUGE OUR PEOPLE."

Eric Daugherty

788,949 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Trump on USMCA renegotiation "I don't really care about it, so it might go away. No real advantage to us. It's irrelevant to me. Canada would love it. Canada wants it. They need it." "Because we don't need Canada product. That's the thing. You know, I want to be a nice person, but we don't need." "I want to build the cars here, not in Canada. We used to build cars in Canada." "Now the Canada cars, the Canadians are moving here to build cars. Same thing with Mexico." Q " What about the raw materials coming in from countries like Canada?" Trump "Well, we get it, but we have a lot of our own raw materials. And, you know, the word raw and rare are a little bit of a misnomer They're not very rare." "You have a lot of places that want to sell us material, and we get it from a lot of different countries, and we have a lot of rare earth and raw materials." Donald J. Trump
1:14

Trump on USMCA renegotiation "I don't really care about it, so it might go away. No real advantage to us. It's irrelevant to me. Canada would love it. Canada wants it. They need it." "Because we don't need Canada product. That's the thing. You know, I want to be a nice person, but we don't need." "I want to build the cars here, not in Canada. We used to build cars in Canada." "Now the Canada cars, the Canadians are moving here to build cars. Same thing with Mexico." Q " What about the raw materials coming in from countries like Canada?" Trump "Well, we get it, but we have a lot of our own raw materials. And, you know, the word raw and rare are a little bit of a misnomer They're not very rare." "You have a lot of places that want to sell us material, and we get it from a lot of different countries, and we have a lot of rare earth and raw materials." Donald J. Trump

cbcwatcher

197,741 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Kelly Oubre Jr. was asked about so many Knicks fans being in Philadelphia tonight: "I could say something that could get clickbaited, but I'm not. At the end of the day, we're the show on the court. We're not necessarily focused on the crowd, the things like that. Obviously, we need it. We love it and we love our fans. But at the end of the day, we have to lock in on our task. We have to figure out our gameplan, just have a tight huddle. No matter what, it's loud. It's kind of the same no matter who the crowd is cheering for. It's loud. We have to be focused on the task at hand and just kind of have a short-term memory when it comes to things like that. But at the end of the day, we are home. This is the court that we practice on, we shootaround on and we're comfortable here. We just got to go out there and just perform."
1:02

Kelly Oubre Jr. was asked about so many Knicks fans being in Philadelphia tonight: "I could say something that could get clickbaited, but I'm not. At the end of the day, we're the show on the court. We're not necessarily focused on the crowd, the things like that. Obviously, we need it. We love it and we love our fans. But at the end of the day, we have to lock in on our task. We have to figure out our gameplan, just have a tight huddle. No matter what, it's loud. It's kind of the same no matter who the crowd is cheering for. It's loud. We have to be focused on the task at hand and just kind of have a short-term memory when it comes to things like that. But at the end of the day, we are home. This is the court that we practice on, we shootaround on and we're comfortable here. We just got to go out there and just perform."

Knicks Videos

81,963 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Are Flock Cameras Actually Good? Andrew Bustamante: "I understand why people don't like flock cameras, but I am a fan of this type of public surveillance. Because we don't have a right to privacy. We think we do, but it's not actually listed out anywhere. The term right to privacy doesn't exist, but we do have the public expectation of security from our police and from our law enforcement agencies." "So this creates a deterrent to keep right people doing the right thing, and wrong people getting caught. But it also creates a trail of evidence... that can be brought to the table to prosecute people who are charged with breaking the law. If you are a law abiding citizen, you have nothing to fear from these things. It's only if you are speeding, crossing at the red light, robbing somebody, if you're doing something that you don't want to get caught... that's when you don't like it." Sarah Adams: "A lot of people think when there's something like this, someone is sitting and watching it all day, and you really only go into this data when you're looking for a piece of info... I know cops are using it to track their exes, and I said, fire them. So I like it because the more data you have to solve a crime, better."
4:23

Are Flock Cameras Actually Good? Andrew Bustamante: "I understand why people don't like flock cameras, but I am a fan of this type of public surveillance. Because we don't have a right to privacy. We think we do, but it's not actually listed out anywhere. The term right to privacy doesn't exist, but we do have the public expectation of security from our police and from our law enforcement agencies." "So this creates a deterrent to keep right people doing the right thing, and wrong people getting caught. But it also creates a trail of evidence... that can be brought to the table to prosecute people who are charged with breaking the law. If you are a law abiding citizen, you have nothing to fear from these things. It's only if you are speeding, crossing at the red light, robbing somebody, if you're doing something that you don't want to get caught... that's when you don't like it." Sarah Adams: "A lot of people think when there's something like this, someone is sitting and watching it all day, and you really only go into this data when you're looking for a piece of info... I know cops are using it to track their exes, and I said, fire them. So I like it because the more data you have to solve a crime, better."

PBD Podcast

67,773 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:
2:27

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:

Sola Media

38,681 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

Trump "You know, we hear Canada, we have a great relationship with the people of Canada, but it's been very difficult." "...We don't want to do anything bad, but they have, economically, we have such power over Canada. I'd rather not use it" On the DST "But they did something with our tech companies today trying to copy Europe. It's not going to work out well for Europe either, and it's not going to work out well for Canada." "They were foolish to do it" "So I said we're going to stop all negotiations with Canada right now until they straighten out their act." On supply management "You don't read this and the people don't report, but they charge us 400% on some dairy products. 400%."Donald J. Trump
1:57

Trump "You know, we hear Canada, we have a great relationship with the people of Canada, but it's been very difficult." "...We don't want to do anything bad, but they have, economically, we have such power over Canada. I'd rather not use it" On the DST "But they did something with our tech companies today trying to copy Europe. It's not going to work out well for Europe either, and it's not going to work out well for Canada." "They were foolish to do it" "So I said we're going to stop all negotiations with Canada right now until they straighten out their act." On supply management "You don't read this and the people don't report, but they charge us 400% on some dairy products. 400%."Donald J. Trump

cbcwatcher

414,614 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"My feeling is this. I'm not pro-immigration. I'm not anti-immigration. What I want is for people who are not corrupt, who are well-informed about the issue, to figure out what the best level of immigration is and to set up a process that works. I don't want to see any illegals. I want to see people who come in legally. I want to see the number. Maybe it's a high number. Maybe it's a low number. I don't know, but I'd like to see the right number. I'd like us to at least aspire to it. And then most important of all, and I see this in both England and the US, somewhere along the line, we apparently decided it was impolite to ask people who wished to come to our countries, whether they liked us and aspired to be a part of our civilization. And my feeling is whatever the number is that we should be allowing in, I don't want any who don't aspire to be American. I want people who like it, who want to make the place better and want to participate in it because they see it as good. We should not be letting people in who want to destroy it. Obviously, I can't imagine that anyone has to say that out loud, but apparently it has to be said out loud because it's not obvious to a lot of people. And the point is, it is what I just said anti-immigrant? No, it's anti-people who hate us. And I have a right to be anti-people who hate us..." - Bret Weinstein on immigration, with Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
2:36

"My feeling is this. I'm not pro-immigration. I'm not anti-immigration. What I want is for people who are not corrupt, who are well-informed about the issue, to figure out what the best level of immigration is and to set up a process that works. I don't want to see any illegals. I want to see people who come in legally. I want to see the number. Maybe it's a high number. Maybe it's a low number. I don't know, but I'd like to see the right number. I'd like us to at least aspire to it. And then most important of all, and I see this in both England and the US, somewhere along the line, we apparently decided it was impolite to ask people who wished to come to our countries, whether they liked us and aspired to be a part of our civilization. And my feeling is whatever the number is that we should be allowing in, I don't want any who don't aspire to be American. I want people who like it, who want to make the place better and want to participate in it because they see it as good. We should not be letting people in who want to destroy it. Obviously, I can't imagine that anyone has to say that out loud, but apparently it has to be said out loud because it's not obvious to a lot of people. And the point is, it is what I just said anti-immigrant? No, it's anti-people who hate us. And I have a right to be anti-people who hate us..." - Bret Weinstein on immigration, with Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

The Darkhorse Podcast

152,191 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The Washington Post’s Cleve Wootson: “One more, Elon Musk is slated to interview [Donald J. Trump] tomorrow — tonight on — on X. I don't know if the president is going to — feel free to say if he is or not — but I — I think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue. It's a — you know, it's an America issue. What role does the White House or the President have any sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of inter — intervening in that. Some of that was about campaign misinformation, but you know it's a wider thing, right?” KJP: “Yeah, no, I mean, you've heard us talk about this many times from here about the responsibilities that social media platforms have when it comes to misinformation, disinformation. I don't have anything to read out from here about specific ways that we're working on it, but we believe that that they have the responsibility. These are private companies, so we're also mindful of that too, but look — it is — I think it is incredibly important to call that out as you're — you're doing. I just don't have any specifics on what we have been doing internally as it relates to the interviews, not something that I'm tracking, and I'm sure the President's not tracking it either.”
1:18

The Washington Post’s Cleve Wootson: “One more, Elon Musk is slated to interview [Donald J. Trump] tomorrow — tonight on — on X. I don't know if the president is going to — feel free to say if he is or not — but I — I think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue. It's a — you know, it's an America issue. What role does the White House or the President have any sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of inter — intervening in that. Some of that was about campaign misinformation, but you know it's a wider thing, right?” KJP: “Yeah, no, I mean, you've heard us talk about this many times from here about the responsibilities that social media platforms have when it comes to misinformation, disinformation. I don't have anything to read out from here about specific ways that we're working on it, but we believe that that they have the responsibility. These are private companies, so we're also mindful of that too, but look — it is — I think it is incredibly important to call that out as you're — you're doing. I just don't have any specifics on what we have been doing internally as it relates to the interviews, not something that I'm tracking, and I'm sure the President's not tracking it either.”

Curtis Houck

2,664,564 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

#WATCH | On announcing 25% tariff, plus a penalty on India, US President Donald Trump says, "...Prime Minister Modi is a friend of mine, but they don't do very much business in terms of business with us. They sell a lot to us, but we don't buy from them...Because the tariff is so high. They have one of the highest tariffs in the world now. They are willing to cut it very substantially. But we will see what happens...." He further says, "We are negotiating right now and it's also BRICS. BRICS, which is basically a group of countries that are anti the United States and India is a member of that...It is an attack on the dollar and we are not going to let anybody attack the dollar. So it's partially BRICS and it's partially trade...We had a tremendous deficit. Prime Minister Modi is a friend of mine, but they don't do very much business in terms of business with us. They sell a lot to us, but we don't buy from them...Because the tariff is so high. They have one of the highest tariffs in the world. Now, they are willing to cut it very substantially. But we will see what happens. We are talking to India now. We will see what happens. It doesn't matter too much whether we have a deal or we charge them a certain tariff. But you will know at the end of this week..." (Source: The White House)
1:12

#WATCH | On announcing 25% tariff, plus a penalty on India, US President Donald Trump says, "...Prime Minister Modi is a friend of mine, but they don't do very much business in terms of business with us. They sell a lot to us, but we don't buy from them...Because the tariff is so high. They have one of the highest tariffs in the world now. They are willing to cut it very substantially. But we will see what happens...." He further says, "We are negotiating right now and it's also BRICS. BRICS, which is basically a group of countries that are anti the United States and India is a member of that...It is an attack on the dollar and we are not going to let anybody attack the dollar. So it's partially BRICS and it's partially trade...We had a tremendous deficit. Prime Minister Modi is a friend of mine, but they don't do very much business in terms of business with us. They sell a lot to us, but we don't buy from them...Because the tariff is so high. They have one of the highest tariffs in the world. Now, they are willing to cut it very substantially. But we will see what happens. We are talking to India now. We will see what happens. It doesn't matter too much whether we have a deal or we charge them a certain tariff. But you will know at the end of this week..." (Source: The White House)

ANI

591,429 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Pegula on the WTA’s gender test Jessica: “Yeah, my opinion is I think the WTA just wanted to update their policy based on what they have seen from other sporting organizations. So far, at least from my point of view, I don't really have any pushback on it. I think I haven't heard, even being on council, no players have really mentioned or said anything about it. Now that it's been announced, I think we'll see. Obviously now that we are here in Toronto, a bigger tournament, and going into Cincy when the testing starts, we'll see if there's any more feedback. I think so far no one's really said anything, and I think it's more just the tour making a decision updating it, and it kind of is what it is.” “So do you think the testing is going to begin in Cincy?” Jessica: “I think so.” “Have you been told?” Jessica: “Is it Cincy? Yeah, I think it's Cincinnati is when it starts.” “So you've been communicated some details about how this is going to roll out?” Jessica: “Oh, yeah. Yeah, like we had a whole, we had to watch a video and do a whole thing to kind of, like a rollout of the education and why we're doing it. It wasn't just kind of laid on us, like, you have to do this. There was a lot of education and stuff in the background of all the stuff the players have had to do to learn about it.” (via Toronto Press)
1:23

Pegula on the WTA’s gender test Jessica: “Yeah, my opinion is I think the WTA just wanted to update their policy based on what they have seen from other sporting organizations. So far, at least from my point of view, I don't really have any pushback on it. I think I haven't heard, even being on council, no players have really mentioned or said anything about it. Now that it's been announced, I think we'll see. Obviously now that we are here in Toronto, a bigger tournament, and going into Cincy when the testing starts, we'll see if there's any more feedback. I think so far no one's really said anything, and I think it's more just the tour making a decision updating it, and it kind of is what it is.” “So do you think the testing is going to begin in Cincy?” Jessica: “I think so.” “Have you been told?” Jessica: “Is it Cincy? Yeah, I think it's Cincinnati is when it starts.” “So you've been communicated some details about how this is going to roll out?” Jessica: “Oh, yeah. Yeah, like we had a whole, we had to watch a video and do a whole thing to kind of, like a rollout of the education and why we're doing it. It wasn't just kind of laid on us, like, you have to do this. There was a lot of education and stuff in the background of all the stuff the players have had to do to learn about it.” (via Toronto Press)

The Tennis Letter

157,476 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

VP VANCE PREDICTED: PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANGRY, AND RIGHTFULLY SO "This stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice. People are going to get angry, and rightfully so." If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so. If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so.
3:02

VP VANCE PREDICTED: PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANGRY, AND RIGHTFULLY SO "This stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice. People are going to get angry, and rightfully so." If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so. If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so.

Svetlana Lokhova

254,325 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

The Ditch: The Party Line | Episode 14: Fascism at Home, with William Wall 'It seems plain enough to me that whatever about a posture or certain aesthetics that might hint at a right populism, at its core it's Declan Ganley and his big gaff outside Galway, hoovering up state contracts in the US. They might posture as right populists but it seems to me like a right, capitalist podcast for the right capitalist class. 'I think that that brings it very much home because we are concerned about the rise of the right on behalf of trans people. We are concerned about the rise of the right on behalf of immigrants. We're concerned about all of these things partly out of what you might see as a kind of solidaristic response to the people who are potentially at the receiving end of their rise. 'But we are also concerned because we are trying to win class politics for a mass of people in this country.'
0:59

The Ditch: The Party Line | Episode 14: Fascism at Home, with William Wall 'It seems plain enough to me that whatever about a posture or certain aesthetics that might hint at a right populism, at its core it's Declan Ganley and his big gaff outside Galway, hoovering up state contracts in the US. They might posture as right populists but it seems to me like a right, capitalist podcast for the right capitalist class. 'I think that that brings it very much home because we are concerned about the rise of the right on behalf of trans people. We are concerned about the rise of the right on behalf of immigrants. We're concerned about all of these things partly out of what you might see as a kind of solidaristic response to the people who are potentially at the receiving end of their rise. 'But we are also concerned because we are trying to win class politics for a mass of people in this country.'

The Ditch

18,323 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"I think among a lot of Democrats there's this kind of what psychologists would call 'learned helplessness' where you just think, 'Well we can't do anything about it. We have to wait till 2029' ... In New York with some people it's just like, 'Well we just have to do our things in New York and not worry about the rest of the country.' It does not work that way. We are one country. Our democracy can rise or fall on what this man is doing. And, it's not just our democracy. ... It directly affects our lives. The stability of our economy depends on the belief in the rule of law that people think we have a stable legal system, and it's hard to believe that today"
1:26

"I think among a lot of Democrats there's this kind of what psychologists would call 'learned helplessness' where you just think, 'Well we can't do anything about it. We have to wait till 2029' ... In New York with some people it's just like, 'Well we just have to do our things in New York and not worry about the rest of the country.' It does not work that way. We are one country. Our democracy can rise or fall on what this man is doing. And, it's not just our democracy. ... It directly affects our lives. The stability of our economy depends on the belief in the rule of law that people think we have a stable legal system, and it's hard to believe that today"

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

80,959 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Right to Recovery Treatment evidence sessions in Scottish Parliament with Third Sector With You and The Salvation Army. What wording should replace “addiction” in the Bill to ensure people can access treatment without requiring a formal diagnosis? @GraemeCall78170 instead of answering his reply focuses on systemic access issues and the limitations of the Bill’s scope. Dr Sandesh Gulhane reminds him that the bill has narrow scope due to it not being a government bill and has to ask again about the use of the word addiction. Director of Addictions of The Salvation Armysays, "I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing". (Yes, its like a scene from the Ministry of Funny Walks) only none of this is funny, but deadly serious. Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Just on the point of addiction being used as a diagnosis, we heard from the Royal College of Psychiatrists, it was clear that perhaps the word addiction is not the right word to be used, and I'm sure that Douglas Ross, who is he member in charge of the bill, would be looking into that. So if we were to amend this because we need to say that you have something, not necessarily a diagnosis, but what is it that we should be saying in, in your opinion, as a way to have the right to have a treatment. Is it simply you would like to receive treatment or what exactly would you suggest?" @GraemeCall78170 "I think it for us, it's always been about access, right, so treatment is there. We recognise as an organisation we have a full clinical offer in England, not in Scotland, so we understand the importance of clinical process processes and in certain circumstances diagnosis is absolutely critical because there are other things that are going on, underlying mental health, underlying physical problems, so we completely recognise that. But the reality of the system is that people can't get access to the system, it's not about treatment. So services like ours here, all we do is we try and find ways to navigate the system to try and get people to where they need to be. But a lot of people that we engage with don't need a medical intervention, they dont. They just some mutual aid, some support, they need some practical stuff around their housing. So I think it's the disappointing thing as I read the bill as it was presented, it did feel narrow to me. I can't deny that. And I think it didn't reflect the experiences that we have as organisation." Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Being a member's bill it does need to be very narrow. It's not a government bill. If it was a government bill, that that's fair enough that this really does need to have enough scope. But my question was, what wording would you use in instead of a diagnosis of addiction? What wording would you like to see for people who do want to access treatment?" Lee Ball [Director of Addictions, Salvation Army] "For me, I think it's the person's right to want treatment. I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing. I don't envy your job trying to come up with a word for this because there are so many words that have so many different meanings."
2:30

Right to Recovery Treatment evidence sessions in Scottish Parliament with Third Sector With You and The Salvation Army. What wording should replace “addiction” in the Bill to ensure people can access treatment without requiring a formal diagnosis? @GraemeCall78170 instead of answering his reply focuses on systemic access issues and the limitations of the Bill’s scope. Dr Sandesh Gulhane reminds him that the bill has narrow scope due to it not being a government bill and has to ask again about the use of the word addiction. Director of Addictions of The Salvation Armysays, "I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing". (Yes, its like a scene from the Ministry of Funny Walks) only none of this is funny, but deadly serious. Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Just on the point of addiction being used as a diagnosis, we heard from the Royal College of Psychiatrists, it was clear that perhaps the word addiction is not the right word to be used, and I'm sure that Douglas Ross, who is he member in charge of the bill, would be looking into that. So if we were to amend this because we need to say that you have something, not necessarily a diagnosis, but what is it that we should be saying in, in your opinion, as a way to have the right to have a treatment. Is it simply you would like to receive treatment or what exactly would you suggest?" @GraemeCall78170 "I think it for us, it's always been about access, right, so treatment is there. We recognise as an organisation we have a full clinical offer in England, not in Scotland, so we understand the importance of clinical process processes and in certain circumstances diagnosis is absolutely critical because there are other things that are going on, underlying mental health, underlying physical problems, so we completely recognise that. But the reality of the system is that people can't get access to the system, it's not about treatment. So services like ours here, all we do is we try and find ways to navigate the system to try and get people to where they need to be. But a lot of people that we engage with don't need a medical intervention, they dont. They just some mutual aid, some support, they need some practical stuff around their housing. So I think it's the disappointing thing as I read the bill as it was presented, it did feel narrow to me. I can't deny that. And I think it didn't reflect the experiences that we have as organisation." Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Being a member's bill it does need to be very narrow. It's not a government bill. If it was a government bill, that that's fair enough that this really does need to have enough scope. But my question was, what wording would you use in instead of a diagnosis of addiction? What wording would you like to see for people who do want to access treatment?" Lee Ball [Director of Addictions, Salvation Army] "For me, I think it's the person's right to want treatment. I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing. I don't envy your job trying to come up with a word for this because there are so many words that have so many different meanings."

FAVORUK 💜

22,503 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Trump: So, we are going to have a phenomenal ballroom. It's going to be one of the best anywhere in the world. There won't be anything like it, actually. It's four sides of beautiful glass. A new thing is you build a super modern building next to an old-fashioned building and I think that's good but I don't have the courage to do that with the white house. It's good for a lot of places. It's not good for here. We will be able to have state dinners. We would literally not even have state dinners because it is not set up.
0:55

Trump: So, we are going to have a phenomenal ballroom. It's going to be one of the best anywhere in the world. There won't be anything like it, actually. It's four sides of beautiful glass. A new thing is you build a super modern building next to an old-fashioned building and I think that's good but I don't have the courage to do that with the white house. It's good for a lot of places. It's not good for here. We will be able to have state dinners. We would literally not even have state dinners because it is not set up.

Acyn

233,072 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

NEW: A Local Resident Who Physically Went Out To Lahaina To Help Victims Of The Maui, Hawaii Fires Tells Her Story, It’s Not Good She recorded this the day after going: “Insulin was boated in and it got turned away from FEMA on the shoreline” “So I went out to Lahaina yesterday and I thought that I should just update the world on what FEMA is doing or what's going on because I just saw that they posted a website to defend themselves against the rumors. But I went out to Lahaina yesterday to help and talked to OneMaidHub from a Native Hawaiian and they got insulin from a private sector. ‌ Obviously we are not getting any help from the government or anyone at all. So they were getting insulin boated in and it got turned away from FEMA on the shoreline. So they turned away that and then this, which that was one or two days ago because the hub literally told us that. They were like, we don't even know what's going on or why they're turning things away. Cause it's not like they're getting us stuff and then also found out that we need storage containers and FEMA turned away 60 of them just yesterday as well, or the day before. And we need those things because there's supposed to be more hurricanes coming. ‌ So I don't know what's going on, but I thought I should share so you guys know what's going on from someone who is here and also going to Lahaina and seeing all of this with my own eyes and hearing it from people that are over there with the hubs and-like living over there and managing all of this because I'm like, I don't know what they're doing, but it's not a lot besides turning away supplies. And I know there's a lot of talk going around on here. And so I just thought I should relay that message.” DEWs, Direct Energy Weapons #Hawaii #Maui #MauiFires #Lahaina #LahainaFires #DEWs #DirectedEnergyWeapons
1:41

NEW: A Local Resident Who Physically Went Out To Lahaina To Help Victims Of The Maui, Hawaii Fires Tells Her Story, It’s Not Good She recorded this the day after going: “Insulin was boated in and it got turned away from FEMA on the shoreline” “So I went out to Lahaina yesterday and I thought that I should just update the world on what FEMA is doing or what's going on because I just saw that they posted a website to defend themselves against the rumors. But I went out to Lahaina yesterday to help and talked to OneMaidHub from a Native Hawaiian and they got insulin from a private sector. ‌ Obviously we are not getting any help from the government or anyone at all. So they were getting insulin boated in and it got turned away from FEMA on the shoreline. So they turned away that and then this, which that was one or two days ago because the hub literally told us that. They were like, we don't even know what's going on or why they're turning things away. Cause it's not like they're getting us stuff and then also found out that we need storage containers and FEMA turned away 60 of them just yesterday as well, or the day before. And we need those things because there's supposed to be more hurricanes coming. ‌ So I don't know what's going on, but I thought I should share so you guys know what's going on from someone who is here and also going to Lahaina and seeing all of this with my own eyes and hearing it from people that are over there with the hubs and-like living over there and managing all of this because I'm like, I don't know what they're doing, but it's not a lot besides turning away supplies. And I know there's a lot of talk going around on here. And so I just thought I should relay that message.” DEWs, Direct Energy Weapons #Hawaii #Maui #MauiFires #Lahaina #LahainaFires #DEWs #DirectedEnergyWeapons

Wall Street Apes

347,751 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"I think that's one of the reasons why our guys plays so freakin' hard -- they see what we're building, they see what we're about and they want to be a part of it. "It's not where we want to be, but there are some foundational things we're excited about. We just have to make sure the record catches up with those things that we're doing"
0:32

"I think that's one of the reasons why our guys plays so freakin' hard -- they see what we're building, they see what we're about and they want to be a part of it. "It's not where we want to be, but there are some foundational things we're excited about. We just have to make sure the record catches up with those things that we're doing"

New York Jets

36,984 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten