Jay Bhattacharya on the topic most would-be NIH directors would assiduously avoid: How much NIH research is irreproducible or outright fraudulent? The fake amyloid beta *56 protein in Alzheimer's research is the perfect example.

The things he's saying used to be understood without need to elaborate. Corruption has gradually changed the mindset.

Why DeepSeek may not be as big of a deal as X pundits make it out to be.

Thanks for all your reporting. The true spirit of the Fourth Estate.

I tried. I really tried.

"Unfortunately, much bought modern biomedical science..." LOL.

The caveat with reproducibility will be an immense challenge with cancer, where both men noted- and intratumoral heterogeneity are the biggest obstacles. But solutions have been proposed to the NIH to overcome those obstacles. They need to be enacted.

Emily, before throwing the baby out with the bathwater based on one research theme, I strongly suggest familiarizing yourself with the genes responsible early onset familial alzheimer. They are predominantly amyloid increasers. CJD mutations, see Prusiner's long list of distinct amyloidoses.

He did really well in the hearings today.

@IamBrookJackson Truth

We are facing the scientific questions of: What is a woman? Tampon in the men's bathroom? DragQueen reading in kindergarten. No transgenders in women's sport. Minor attracted persons Man boy love association