Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Jeffery Epstien conducted a conference called Confronting Gravity. DHS has some of this stuff. I'm talking about people like David Grusch, Dave Fravor, Jake Barber." Eric Weinstien speaks on Jefferey Epstien's interest in antigravity research
647,406 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 0
Нет доступных комментариев
Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста
![𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬: 𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐆𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐜𝐡 𝐋𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐀𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐇𝐢𝐬 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐅𝐎 𝐓𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐜 In a recent FOIA reply that @blackvaultcom received back in his inquiry into David Grusch’s interview with the @DeptofDefense Inspector General in 2021, it states that “Major Grusch stated that [redacted]. He stated he “has been studying UAPs for 15 years” and that he serves as the NRO to the UAP Task Force”. In interviews David Grusch has previously done, including the very popular Joe Rogan Podcast News with Joe Rogan, Grusch stated that (paraphrasing) “he didn’t have an interest in the UAP topic for most of his career”. He’s also stated that he didn’t even start paying attention to the topic until he read up on the 2017 The New York Times article about Lue Elizondo. This new insight from an interview with the DoD Inspector General now shows that David Grusch has in fact, on record, stated that he has an interest in the UFO topic for his ENTIRE CAREER, which spans back 14 years according to his military and government service. If you take 2021, subtract 15 years, that is 2006 and around the time he joined the military, maybe even a little before. Proof that David Grusch has LIED to the public about his involvement and interest in this topic. Video of the #JRE podcast where Grusch claims to have had no previous interest before 2017 attached. Link to FOIA document:](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1745940204282613935/amplify_video_thumb/1745940152227188736/img/puJDgB_xgx3feLRE.jpg)
![Lue Elizondo Once Again Says That David Grusch Knows "A lot more" (Like what? What Does Grusch Know?) "I'm telling you straight up, that guy, he knows a lot more." - LE Lue says that David Grusch's knowledge is NOT just anecdotal or secondhand information and that if Grusch was allowed to say everything he knows, folks wouldn't say Grusch's testimony is all just secondhand information. David Grusch has already publicly said last year that he has some firsthand knowledge that he was was going to reveal in his op-ed that never came out. During Ross Coulthart's Reddit AMA (6 months ago), Rossco did say that Grusch's op-ed is still coming out. Also, Rep. Eric Burlison mentioned that he had a copy/draft of Grusch's op-ed. That is the last I've heard about Grusch's op-ed though. On January 8, 2024, a now deleted reddit post claimed that David Grusch had a private 60-person presentation in New York city. The reddit user (who deleted their reddit account) posted some pictures of the presentation and had this to say. "He [David Grusch] also mentioned a few other things that I haven't heard him say before. Like that, he was told about a uap that was in our possession that had a diameter of around 40 ft, but once u went inside, it was the size of a football field. "He also mentioned that the US has taken part in a fair amount of crash retrievals before 1933. Also that we wouldn't be surprised by what the NHI look like, such as they look like the typical grey and they aren't sure where these being have come from. "He also mentioned that he had recently been informed that a US adversary was considering full disclosure to get out ahead of the US and that he passed this information along to the US government. "Some asked him about this, and what he said was that he was part of an extremely secret program that had figured out how to track and find uap's in our atmosphere and near earth orbit. He said his oped will include much more details regarding this. "Interestingly, he also mentioned how many people know the full scope of the phenomenon to be no more then 50 people, but it wasn't clear whether this meant 50 people currently alive or 50 people ever in history." David Grusch also mentioned during his appearance on the Joe Rogan podcast that he helped liaison a meeting with folks who studied the non-human bodies and "Senior people" at Washington D.C. So what the hell does David Grusch know? I think he has definitely seen data and evidence of the non-human bodies retrieved from some of these crashes/landings. Not to mention lots of video/data of these non-human craft zipping around the atmosphere or possibly even space or underwater. Link to the Lue Elizondo interview in the next post below. I'll also include the Joe Rogan clip and what's left of the deleted Reddit post.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1845885993389547777/ext_tw_video_thumb/1845876695342968832/pu/img/B0XEy-eLMa8t9gtk.jpg)
![DAVID GRUSCH ON WASTE, GOLDEN DOME, AND "GREATER ROT" Pertinent to upcoming action by the U.S. House of Representatives on the Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA, H.R. 8800), David Grusch (former intelligence officer and currently a special advisor on the congressional staff of Eric Burlison) recently opined that there is substantial "waste, fraud, and abuse" in the world of classified programs, and characterized some such programs as "jobs programs for contractors." Grusch cited as an example some of the research programs that have now been incorporated into the Golden Dome for America missile defense development program, which was launched by an executive order issued by President Trump on January 27, 2025. "The goods that they're selling don't really work," Grusch said, referring back to his experience reviewing some such programs "about six years ago." The Trump Administration’s budget materials call for roughly $17.5 billion for Golden Dome during fiscal year 2027, including a portion to be authorized in the NDAA. Grusch did not comment on his view of the Golden Dome program as a whole, but only on the purported elements of waste and abuse. Grusch asserted that the abuse he believes exists in the form of undisclosed UAP-related reverse-engineering programs is "a symptom of this greater rot in the deep state....And I speak from [the perspective of] somebody who had that broad access, but also the acumen to actually understand a lot of these programs." This clip is from an exchange with Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch, released May 5, 2026. The clip is 141 seconds from a 75-minute interview, presented under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107) for noncommercial purposes of facilitating education, commentary, research and debate. An image of a transcript of this clip is attached to the first reply. The complete interview is available on Judicial Watch's YouTube channel. Substantive replies relevant to the assertions presented by David Grusch in this specific clip are welcome here. However, replies dealing mainly with other unrelated assertions by Grusch (or with other UAP matters) do not belong in this thread; those who egregiously violate this advisory may be blocked.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2066567013376385430/amplify_video_thumb/2066543760423469056/img/gH3kb7RNyHA8cOcV.jpg)
![🔥🛸👽 Grusch: Senior Congressional Staffers Had Their World-Bubble Burst After Being Briefed on the Biological Analysis and Physiology of Alien Bodies 👽🛸🔥 (This is one of the most important claims in the history of the topic because, if true, it overcomes the, "It-may-be-our-tech" argument.) Rogan: "So, when it comes to these...I'm gonna bring it back to these, these actual entities." Grusch: "Yeah." Rogan: "Do we know, or [do we] have an understanding of how many of them we're talking about, and the variety of them?" Grusch: "Yeah, there is a variety, and we have a certain number of (laughs) different things, umm. But the like, total numbers of like, what's interacting with us on Earth? I mean, nobody knows that. And, I mean, that..." Rogan: "But there's an understanding of some that they do believe are interacting with us, and there's a variety in terms of...there's variables?" Grusch: "Yeah, I talked to people who are familiar with the biological analysis and everything. So we have some idea, not a complete picture, because it's like, you know, you know, you're looking at, it's like, well, I don't even understand the physiology at all. It's like, what the heck? It's like, way different, right? So, umm...we have at least a..." Rogan: "Is there a description of this physiology? Grusch: "Yeah, no, I was in...I was in the room when, uhhh (exhales)...hmm. I gotta be careful, I don't wanna... I was in Washington, DC with a very number of senior people that work for members of Congress - put it that way - umm, when I was still in government. And I brought the people who worked on that stuff to The Hill. I mean, this is why the members were so confident to put out the Schumer amendment (UAPDA) and stuff. And I was like, 'Please explain.' "And, um, they went into all those details and stuff. And I remember, you know (laughs), some of the professional staff members were like, 'Whoa.' Like, they were like, in G-LOC, right? Because, I mean it's like a total world-bubble, umm...got burst right there for a lot of people. "And, so we have some idea, it's not a complete picture. I mean, it's just like...but you're not even bringing in the right people. Like, I think about my friend and colleague, Dr. Garry P. Nolan, which I started the SOL Foundation non-profit with. I mean, he's like, Nobel-level, biologist, virologist. Like, he's the guy that you would want on it, but he's not on it. So, I think we can make a lot of progress in our understanding once again, if this is more broadly studied in an open environment." ~ Note: G-LOC = Gravity-Induced Loss of Consciousness. In Laymen's terms, losing consciousness when a plane pulls more Gs than your body can handle. Source: dot com/blog/what-is-g-loc](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2050662480012296693/amplify_video_thumb/2050636008421838848/img/2L3ynKMT89gG9z0l.jpg)