正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Jennings: I have no problem with people protesting peacefully. Phillip: Why demonize them? Jennings: Because I think it's a legitimate political debate about what they're protesting for Phillip: Everybody painted with the same brush and you all were opposed and upset about that. Why are you applying that same... show more

Acyn

762,688 subscribers

685,376 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育喜剧

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Jennings: What they're seeing is massive amounts of propaganda. Look at what the NYT had to admit to just in the last few days Phillip: They admitted that they ran a photo of a starving child who also had a disease? Jennings: It’s a hoax Phillip: What about all the other children in that story? Are they a hoax? Jennings: Some of them are Phillip: You claimed what you claimed was that all of these young people, not just young people, but everybody in the world, the photos that they're seeing, the stories that they're reading, the first person accounts are a hoax. Are they a hoax? What about all of the other children? Jennings: What about all of the other hoaxes? Phillip: I’m putting a stop to the talking points. Leave the talking points at the door.

Jennings: What they're seeing is massive amounts of propaganda. Look at what the NYT had to admit to just in the last few days Phillip: They admitted that they ran a photo of a starving child who also had a disease? Jennings: It’s a hoax Phillip: What about all the other children in that story? Are they a hoax? Jennings: Some of them are Phillip: You claimed what you claimed was that all of these young people, not just young people, but everybody in the world, the photos that they're seeing, the stories that they're reading, the first person accounts are a hoax. Are they a hoax? What about all of the other children? Jennings: What about all of the other hoaxes? Phillip: I’m putting a stop to the talking points. Leave the talking points at the door.

Acyn

569,351 次观看 • 1 年前

Phillip: But don't they have to actually prove that those people are who they say they are and that they've carried out those acts? Jennings: Well, we know they're violent people Phillip: How do we know?

Phillip: But don't they have to actually prove that those people are who they say they are and that they've carried out those acts? Jennings: Well, we know they're violent people Phillip: How do we know?

Acyn

503,012 次观看 • 1 年前

Jennings: It's pretty clear there is concern that these two guys have used their positions and their public statements to try to obstruct the execution of federal laws… Phillip: Can you give me an example? Jennings: I think they've both made numerous public statements that have made it perfectly clear that they do not want federal laws to be enforced in Minnesota Phillip: Such as? Jennings: They flatly said they don't want ICE there enforcing federal immigration laws. Phillip: If they’re going to pursue criminal charges— Jennings: That’s not what’s been reported Phillip: What’s the subpoena for? Jennings: It’s a preliminary investigation Phillip: It’s an investigation to bring charges Jennings: To find out if charges are warranted.

Jennings: It's pretty clear there is concern that these two guys have used their positions and their public statements to try to obstruct the execution of federal laws… Phillip: Can you give me an example? Jennings: I think they've both made numerous public statements that have made it perfectly clear that they do not want federal laws to be enforced in Minnesota Phillip: Such as? Jennings: They flatly said they don't want ICE there enforcing federal immigration laws. Phillip: If they’re going to pursue criminal charges— Jennings: That’s not what’s been reported Phillip: What’s the subpoena for? Jennings: It’s a preliminary investigation Phillip: It’s an investigation to bring charges Jennings: To find out if charges are warranted.

Acyn

94,146 次观看 • 6 个月前

Jennings: Why would they be upset? Because they've never they've never been able to stand the fact that Trump won… Phillip: How about congress established The Kennedy Center as a memorial for Kennedy and it is illegal for him to slap his name on it? Jennings: He took an interest in this— Phillip: What about the law? Jennings: What about it?

Jennings: Why would they be upset? Because they've never they've never been able to stand the fact that Trump won… Phillip: How about congress established The Kennedy Center as a memorial for Kennedy and it is illegal for him to slap his name on it? Jennings: He took an interest in this— Phillip: What about the law? Jennings: What about it?

Acyn

628,035 次观看 • 1 个月前

Phillip: Is that really acceptable to Republicans like you? Moynihan: What are they lying about? Phillip: They said that the police instigated the attack. Is that true or false? Moynihan: Look, I think. Is it a lot of people…. Phillip: Are these things that they're putting on the website—Is it true or is it false? Moynihan: Look, I think most people…. Phillip: The white house website today says Pence was a coward… You're good with that? Moynihan: I think I understand where the trump base is coming from because they feel frustrated…

Phillip: Is that really acceptable to Republicans like you? Moynihan: What are they lying about? Phillip: They said that the police instigated the attack. Is that true or false? Moynihan: Look, I think. Is it a lot of people…. Phillip: Are these things that they're putting on the website—Is it true or is it false? Moynihan: Look, I think most people…. Phillip: The white house website today says Pence was a coward… You're good with that? Moynihan: I think I understand where the trump base is coming from because they feel frustrated…

Acyn

256,803 次观看 • 7 个月前

Navarro: They're abandoning small children alone in cars while they— Jennings: False Navarro: Don't just say false. Look it up. Jennings: You have these vague anecdotes Navarro: How much more specific do you want me to get? Phillip: She had a specific example. Navarro: Do you think scooping up US citizens— Jennings: I disagree with the generalization that they are scooping US citizens Navarro: There’s 170 that have been scooped up Jennings: You don’t want the law enforced Phillip: It is true that US citizens have been detained by ICE Jennings: Detained and released

Navarro: They're abandoning small children alone in cars while they— Jennings: False Navarro: Don't just say false. Look it up. Jennings: You have these vague anecdotes Navarro: How much more specific do you want me to get? Phillip: She had a specific example. Navarro: Do you think scooping up US citizens— Jennings: I disagree with the generalization that they are scooping US citizens Navarro: There’s 170 that have been scooped up Jennings: You don’t want the law enforced Phillip: It is true that US citizens have been detained by ICE Jennings: Detained and released

Acyn

814,858 次观看 • 9 个月前

Phillip: Why are we bending over backwards to make Iran feel comfortable about signing a deal that actually gives us what we had before and gives them what they did not have? Jennings: You're leaving out the critical piece, which is the document flatly states Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. Phillip: That’s what the JCPOA said. And this document, as we know, says that it reiterates what it has always said which is they are not pursuing a nuclear weapon. Jennings: You believe it? Phillip: No, you don’t believe it. So, why do you believe it now? Jennings: Because we bombed the crap of their uranium enrichment facilities last summer. Setmayer: Apparently not enough.

Phillip: Why are we bending over backwards to make Iran feel comfortable about signing a deal that actually gives us what we had before and gives them what they did not have? Jennings: You're leaving out the critical piece, which is the document flatly states Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. Phillip: That’s what the JCPOA said. And this document, as we know, says that it reiterates what it has always said which is they are not pursuing a nuclear weapon. Jennings: You believe it? Phillip: No, you don’t believe it. So, why do you believe it now? Jennings: Because we bombed the crap of their uranium enrichment facilities last summer. Setmayer: Apparently not enough.

Acyn

379,670 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jennings: And I don't like it when mom and dad are fighting… Phillip: Aren’t Elon’s goals the same goals Republicans said they also shared for decades. So basically it’s out the window now? Is that what you’re saying?

Jennings: And I don't like it when mom and dad are fighting… Phillip: Aren’t Elon’s goals the same goals Republicans said they also shared for decades. So basically it’s out the window now? Is that what you’re saying?

Acyn

38,278 次观看 • 1 年前

Phillip: Those governors have the ability to step in if they wanted to, and they are not. Why are they not doing that? Ungar-Sargon: I think it's so amazing that the line on the left has gone from…. Phillip: You skirted past the question that I asked, which is why? Why are these governors not policing crime in their own states? Why?

Phillip: Those governors have the ability to step in if they wanted to, and they are not. Why are they not doing that? Ungar-Sargon: I think it's so amazing that the line on the left has gone from…. Phillip: You skirted past the question that I asked, which is why? Why are these governors not policing crime in their own states? Why?

Acyn

154,204 次观看 • 11 个月前

Phillip: But the idea that AOC and Rep. Omar are engaging in those activities. Sununu: They showed up on those campuses Phillip: If they show up on college campuses to protest, you know, what the situation in gaza is that are you saying automatically the same thing as uttering anti-semitic words? Sununu: Yes. They are anti-semitic. There is no mistake about it

Phillip: But the idea that AOC and Rep. Omar are engaging in those activities. Sununu: They showed up on those campuses Phillip: If they show up on college campuses to protest, you know, what the situation in gaza is that are you saying automatically the same thing as uttering anti-semitic words? Sununu: Yes. They are anti-semitic. There is no mistake about it

Acyn

314,377 次观看 • 1 年前

Jennings: In fact, I saw them handing out water to people in an airport. I would think the people in Georgia who were worried about water in lines. Hunt: Why are they doing that and not actually enforcing immigration law? Jennings: Because TSA is understaffed and we need line management.

Jennings: In fact, I saw them handing out water to people in an airport. I would think the people in Georgia who were worried about water in lines. Hunt: Why are they doing that and not actually enforcing immigration law? Jennings: Because TSA is understaffed and we need line management.

Acyn

80,719 次观看 • 4 个月前

Phillip: Where are you getting that Minnesota is not abiding by federal law? McCaughey: Because they are impeding the enforcement Phillip: How are they doing that? McCaughey: With these protests.

Phillip: Where are you getting that Minnesota is not abiding by federal law? McCaughey: Because they are impeding the enforcement Phillip: How are they doing that? McCaughey: With these protests.

Acyn

118,850 次观看 • 6 个月前

WATCH: Scott Jennings pushes back against CNN's Abby Phillip. Jennings: "They don't want them to have ballistic missiles… a nuclear program. They don't like that their Navy makes trouble for everybody in the Gulf…" Phillip: "I just want to just reiterate, you just listed a bunch of things. None of them were imminent attack…" Jennings: "Ballistic missiles, Abby. Drones. These are imminent attack weapons." Phillip: "What proof is there that there were ballistic missiles… that could reach the US?" Jennings: "Reach US bases. Look at your television. They're falling right now."

WATCH: Scott Jennings pushes back against CNN's Abby Phillip. Jennings: "They don't want them to have ballistic missiles… a nuclear program. They don't like that their Navy makes trouble for everybody in the Gulf…" Phillip: "I just want to just reiterate, you just listed a bunch of things. None of them were imminent attack…" Jennings: "Ballistic missiles, Abby. Drones. These are imminent attack weapons." Phillip: "What proof is there that there were ballistic missiles… that could reach the US?" Jennings: "Reach US bases. Look at your television. They're falling right now."

Resist the Mainstream

188,811 次观看 • 5 个月前

Jennings: What is it they all have in common…. anti-semites? Phillip: What does it say about the president that he was totally fine with them six months ago? Jennings: He led the party away from those views. And that's one of the reasons they're not in it anymore. Phillip: He spoke on the phone with Tucker Carlson about six weeks ago.

Jennings: What is it they all have in common…. anti-semites? Phillip: What does it say about the president that he was totally fine with them six months ago? Jennings: He led the party away from those views. And that's one of the reasons they're not in it anymore. Phillip: He spoke on the phone with Tucker Carlson about six weeks ago.

Acyn

91,464 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 NEW - Abby Phillip STRIKES AGAIN, saying ICE agents shouldn't wear masks because it's just a "risk" you have to deal with to be doxed, targeted and have your family attacked. Scott Jennings is having none of it. PHILLIP: That is a risk that every law enforcement officer in this country faces. JENNINGS: You think they SHOULD? PHILLIP: Other officers show their faces because they work for the people. That's a risk you take. JENNINGS: Yeah, well, I don't agree law enforcement in ANY agency should have to face the risk of their family being assaulted. PHILLIP: But the accountability piece of it can't be ignored! JENNINGS: Certain people in our community decided to take matters into their own hands. Democrat officials screaming 'they're the Gestapo!' What do you think that does to radicalize people? That is irresponsible, and it's not the fault of an ICE agent for that kind of rhetoric to be in our system! - Scott Jennings

🚨 NEW - Abby Phillip STRIKES AGAIN, saying ICE agents shouldn't wear masks because it's just a "risk" you have to deal with to be doxed, targeted and have your family attacked. Scott Jennings is having none of it. PHILLIP: That is a risk that every law enforcement officer in this country faces. JENNINGS: You think they SHOULD? PHILLIP: Other officers show their faces because they work for the people. That's a risk you take. JENNINGS: Yeah, well, I don't agree law enforcement in ANY agency should have to face the risk of their family being assaulted. PHILLIP: But the accountability piece of it can't be ignored! JENNINGS: Certain people in our community decided to take matters into their own hands. Democrat officials screaming 'they're the Gestapo!' What do you think that does to radicalize people? That is irresponsible, and it's not the fault of an ICE agent for that kind of rhetoric to be in our system! - Scott Jennings

Eric Daugherty

151,314 次观看 • 11 个月前

Hunt: Why is the Trump admin covering for these people? Jennings: I don't know that they are covering for them. They've released all the documents, and as far as I know, she testified today that they're still open investigations…

Hunt: Why is the Trump admin covering for these people? Jennings: I don't know that they are covering for them. They've released all the documents, and as far as I know, she testified today that they're still open investigations…

Acyn

36,622 次观看 • 5 个月前

Phillip: The only reason that we're at a point where Putin even has to talk to some extent, is because Ukraine has kept up the military pressure Jennings: How have they done that? With our help Phillip: Exactly. Your Maga friends were opposed to that, Scott. Jennings: My friend is the president. He's not opposed to that. Phillip: He was and so was the VP.

Phillip: The only reason that we're at a point where Putin even has to talk to some extent, is because Ukraine has kept up the military pressure Jennings: How have they done that? With our help Phillip: Exactly. Your Maga friends were opposed to that, Scott. Jennings: My friend is the president. He's not opposed to that. Phillip: He was and so was the VP.

Acyn

138,150 次观看 • 7 个月前

Phillip: Why is he saying that Georgia was a fraudulent state, that he actually won when he did not? Jennings: He says the things that he believes. Phillip: Is he right? Jennings: I don’t know Phillip: You don’t know? You used to know.

Phillip: Why is he saying that Georgia was a fraudulent state, that he actually won when he did not? Jennings: He says the things that he believes. Phillip: Is he right? Jennings: I don’t know Phillip: You don’t know? You used to know.

Acyn

469,888 次观看 • 6 个月前