Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Jensen Huang explains how blocking China from Nvidia does not mean blocking China from AI. The usual export-control story assumes scarcity: deny the best chips, and the rival falls behind. China is no longer merely waiting at the door of American compute. Huawei’s rise is showing how a sanction...

rohanpaul_ai's profile picture

Rohan Paul

152,831 subscribers

41,215 просмотров • 18 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Jensen Huang just made the most direct argument of his career about why banning Nvidia from China is not a national security strategy but rather a national security failure. Dwarkesh asks why Nvidia should be allowed to sell chips to China at all, if China would just use Huawei chips without them. Jensen's answer was that in the absence of a better choice, you take the only choice you have. As long as China has to settle for inferior chips, they are building their AI infrastructure on a foundation that is slower, harder to program, and years behind American technology. The moment the US decides to ban Nvidia from selling to China entirely, it removes that disadvantage. China is 40 percent of the global technology industry, Jensen said. Conceding that market, handing it entirely to Huawei is a disservice to American national security, American technology leadership, and American economic power. The data shows what has already happened since the export bans tightened. Nvidia's share of China's AI chip market collapsed from 95 percent to 55 percent in 2025 and at one point during the H20 ban, Jensen himself declared Nvidia had gone from 95 percent share to zero on advanced accelerators. The Trump administration's ban on H20 chips cost Nvidia an estimated 15 billion dollars in lost sales, plus a 4.5 billion dollar inventory write-down. Without the export controls, Nvidia was on track to generate roughly 23 billion dollars in H20 chip sales to China in 2025 alone. Meanwhile Huawei shipped 812,000 AI chips in 2025 and Beijing has now mandated that all state-funded data centers must switch to domestic chips. Jensen's deeper argument is about the global stack, not the quarterly revenue. When developers around the world build AI on CUDA, Nvidia's programming platform, they are building on American technology. When those AI models deploy into every country, the American stack goes with them. Cutting Nvidia out of China does not slow Chinese AI but rather accelerates the construction of a parallel Chinese tech stack that, once built at scale, competes with American technology everywhere else in the world.
1:42

Jensen Huang just made the most direct argument of his career about why banning Nvidia from China is not a national security strategy but rather a national security failure. Dwarkesh asks why Nvidia should be allowed to sell chips to China at all, if China would just use Huawei chips without them. Jensen's answer was that in the absence of a better choice, you take the only choice you have. As long as China has to settle for inferior chips, they are building their AI infrastructure on a foundation that is slower, harder to program, and years behind American technology. The moment the US decides to ban Nvidia from selling to China entirely, it removes that disadvantage. China is 40 percent of the global technology industry, Jensen said. Conceding that market, handing it entirely to Huawei is a disservice to American national security, American technology leadership, and American economic power. The data shows what has already happened since the export bans tightened. Nvidia's share of China's AI chip market collapsed from 95 percent to 55 percent in 2025 and at one point during the H20 ban, Jensen himself declared Nvidia had gone from 95 percent share to zero on advanced accelerators. The Trump administration's ban on H20 chips cost Nvidia an estimated 15 billion dollars in lost sales, plus a 4.5 billion dollar inventory write-down. Without the export controls, Nvidia was on track to generate roughly 23 billion dollars in H20 chip sales to China in 2025 alone. Meanwhile Huawei shipped 812,000 AI chips in 2025 and Beijing has now mandated that all state-funded data centers must switch to domestic chips. Jensen's deeper argument is about the global stack, not the quarterly revenue. When developers around the world build AI on CUDA, Nvidia's programming platform, they are building on American technology. When those AI models deploy into every country, the American stack goes with them. Cutting Nvidia out of China does not slow Chinese AI but rather accelerates the construction of a parallel Chinese tech stack that, once built at scale, competes with American technology everywhere else in the world.

Milk Road AI

21,133 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.
2:06

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

234,773 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Jensen Huang explains the AI industry as a five layer cake, and why "model only" companies are missing the real map. "AI is not just a model. AI is really a five layer cake to think about it." "From the lowest level, it requires energy because AI is produced, generated in real time, just like you and I right now. We need calories, we need energy." "The next level is chips. This is where Nvidia is and where a lot of the companies in Taiwan are." "The layer above that is infrastructure: land, power, data center, as well as the cloud service software that turns the chips into a cloud service." "The layer above that is where most people think about when they think about AI, which is models. ChatGPT was revolutionary. Claude Code is now incredibly successful. But AI is much more than just human language." Most people are still debating the model layer. Jensen is describing an industrial stack: energy, chips, infrastructure, models, and applications. If you are building in AI, this is the map that matters. The winning product may look like software, but the bottlenecks are calories, land, power, data centers, chips, and distribution. - Jensen Huang (NVIDIA), CEO of Nvidia, on CNA
1:48

Jensen Huang explains the AI industry as a five layer cake, and why "model only" companies are missing the real map. "AI is not just a model. AI is really a five layer cake to think about it." "From the lowest level, it requires energy because AI is produced, generated in real time, just like you and I right now. We need calories, we need energy." "The next level is chips. This is where Nvidia is and where a lot of the companies in Taiwan are." "The layer above that is infrastructure: land, power, data center, as well as the cloud service software that turns the chips into a cloud service." "The layer above that is where most people think about when they think about AI, which is models. ChatGPT was revolutionary. Claude Code is now incredibly successful. But AI is much more than just human language." Most people are still debating the model layer. Jensen is describing an industrial stack: energy, chips, infrastructure, models, and applications. If you are building in AI, this is the map that matters. The winning product may look like software, but the bottlenecks are calories, land, power, data centers, chips, and distribution. - Jensen Huang (NVIDIA), CEO of Nvidia, on CNA

Karl Mehta

14,946 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang breaks the myth: The US–China AI competition isn’t about one chip or one model, it’s a five-layer ecosystem. Energy, chips, infrastructure, models, applications. And on four of them, China is already ahead or catching up faster than sanctions can stop. When America bans, China builds. When export controls tighten, China accelerates. You don’t slow a rival by locking the gate, you only teach them how to build their own house.
15:59

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang breaks the myth: The US–China AI competition isn’t about one chip or one model, it’s a five-layer ecosystem. Energy, chips, infrastructure, models, applications. And on four of them, China is already ahead or catching up faster than sanctions can stop. When America bans, China builds. When export controls tighten, China accelerates. You don’t slow a rival by locking the gate, you only teach them how to build their own house.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

44,896 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang explains the architecture of the AI revolution AI is fundamentally about thinking—and that requires supercomputers. We’ve created a new industry: AI infrastructure. It will be as foundational as the electricity and internet infrastructures—permanent for every society. This is a transformative time; how we deliver and produce intelligence is changing. Each layer of the AI stack is growing: 1. Energy 2. Chips 3. Infrastructure 4. AI models 5. AI applications We’re witnessing a complete revolution across the stack, with opportunities at every layer. NVIDIA intends to participate across the entire stack.
1:34

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang explains the architecture of the AI revolution AI is fundamentally about thinking—and that requires supercomputers. We’ve created a new industry: AI infrastructure. It will be as foundational as the electricity and internet infrastructures—permanent for every society. This is a transformative time; how we deliver and produce intelligence is changing. Each layer of the AI stack is growing: 1. Energy 2. Chips 3. Infrastructure 4. AI models 5. AI applications We’re witnessing a complete revolution across the stack, with opportunities at every layer. NVIDIA intends to participate across the entire stack.

Ask Perplexity

64,013 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang just told you America is in an AI arms race where half the talent building the weapons was born on the other side. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are from China. Taking it emotionally too far from that results in consequences in relationships that are just harder to manage.” That is not diplomacy. That is the CEO of the most critical company in the AI supply chain telling you the West has a structural dependency it cannot legislate away. Half the minds capable of engineering superintelligence were born, raised, and educated inside the borders of America’s primary geopolitical rival. And Washington is writing policy as if that number does not exist. The politician sees China and reaches for tariffs. Export bans. Visa restrictions. The instinct is confrontation. The endgame is severance. Huang is telling you severance is suicide. You cannot win an intelligence race by amputating half the intelligence. America does not lead AI because of its government. It leads because the best researchers on Earth chose to be here. The compute. The capital. The culture of building. That pull is not permanent. The moment it reverses, the talent does not disappear. It goes home. And it takes the knowledge with it. Every emotionally driven export ban. Every reactionary visa restriction. Every congressional hearing staged for cameras instead of outcomes. Each one is a small push in the wrong direction on a scale that does not forgive miscalculation. China is not debating whether the technology moves too fast. They are building gigawatt-scale data centers and training sovereign models with the full weight of a state that treats AI supremacy as civilizational survival. And they are doing it with a researcher pipeline that America helped build and is now actively dismantling. Huang: “We can have a healthy competition while we compete, compete fairly, and collaborate at the same time.” That sounds reasonable until you hear what he is actually saying. The only path to American AI dominance runs directly through a relationship with the country trying to beat it. That does not fit on a campaign poster. But it is the math. The AI race is not a tariff negotiation. It is the final competition for who writes the operating system every future economy, military, and government runs on. Whoever builds superintelligence first does not get a market advantage. They get a permanent one. The kind no treaty undoes. And America is treating this like a midterm election issue while China is treating it like the last war it will ever need to fight. The danger is not that China outspends the U.S. The danger is that America mistakes emotional foreign policy for strategic foreign policy and severs the very relationships keeping it ahead. The researchers are the resource. Not the chips. Not the data centers. The people who know how to make the models think. Half of them are Chinese. And the U.S. is running a geopolitical strategy that forces those people to choose. Huang sees the board. He sells the GPUs. He knows who is buying them and who is designing on them. And he is telling you the current trajectory ends with America holding the best hardware on Earth and no one left who knows how to use it. The country that wins this will not be the one with the strongest rhetoric. It will be the one that understood the difference between controlling talent and attracting it. Right now, China is attracting. America is restricting. The algorithm does not care about flags. It scales for whoever shows up with the math. And right now, half the people who know the math are being told they are not welcome.
0:28

Jensen Huang just told you America is in an AI arms race where half the talent building the weapons was born on the other side. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are from China. Taking it emotionally too far from that results in consequences in relationships that are just harder to manage.” That is not diplomacy. That is the CEO of the most critical company in the AI supply chain telling you the West has a structural dependency it cannot legislate away. Half the minds capable of engineering superintelligence were born, raised, and educated inside the borders of America’s primary geopolitical rival. And Washington is writing policy as if that number does not exist. The politician sees China and reaches for tariffs. Export bans. Visa restrictions. The instinct is confrontation. The endgame is severance. Huang is telling you severance is suicide. You cannot win an intelligence race by amputating half the intelligence. America does not lead AI because of its government. It leads because the best researchers on Earth chose to be here. The compute. The capital. The culture of building. That pull is not permanent. The moment it reverses, the talent does not disappear. It goes home. And it takes the knowledge with it. Every emotionally driven export ban. Every reactionary visa restriction. Every congressional hearing staged for cameras instead of outcomes. Each one is a small push in the wrong direction on a scale that does not forgive miscalculation. China is not debating whether the technology moves too fast. They are building gigawatt-scale data centers and training sovereign models with the full weight of a state that treats AI supremacy as civilizational survival. And they are doing it with a researcher pipeline that America helped build and is now actively dismantling. Huang: “We can have a healthy competition while we compete, compete fairly, and collaborate at the same time.” That sounds reasonable until you hear what he is actually saying. The only path to American AI dominance runs directly through a relationship with the country trying to beat it. That does not fit on a campaign poster. But it is the math. The AI race is not a tariff negotiation. It is the final competition for who writes the operating system every future economy, military, and government runs on. Whoever builds superintelligence first does not get a market advantage. They get a permanent one. The kind no treaty undoes. And America is treating this like a midterm election issue while China is treating it like the last war it will ever need to fight. The danger is not that China outspends the U.S. The danger is that America mistakes emotional foreign policy for strategic foreign policy and severs the very relationships keeping it ahead. The researchers are the resource. Not the chips. Not the data centers. The people who know how to make the models think. Half of them are Chinese. And the U.S. is running a geopolitical strategy that forces those people to choose. Huang sees the board. He sells the GPUs. He knows who is buying them and who is designing on them. And he is telling you the current trajectory ends with America holding the best hardware on Earth and no one left who knows how to use it. The country that wins this will not be the one with the strongest rhetoric. It will be the one that understood the difference between controlling talent and attracting it. Right now, China is attracting. America is restricting. The algorithm does not care about flags. It scales for whoever shows up with the math. And right now, half the people who know the math are being told they are not welcome.

Dustin

10,925 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Here is what each side actually wants. China wants three things. Cheap energy from the Western Hemisphere. Nvidia chips to fuel its AI. Access to the US market. America wants three things. Chinese consumers to buy stable coins to finance US debt. China as a lab to test AI surveillance that cannot be tested in America. Chinese manufacturing — in America and Venezuela. This is not a trade deal. This is a restructuring of the entire global economy. China becomes the factory and the lab. America becomes the financier and the landlord. Both need each other to survive. That is the grand bargain.
1:43

Here is what each side actually wants. China wants three things. Cheap energy from the Western Hemisphere. Nvidia chips to fuel its AI. Access to the US market. America wants three things. Chinese consumers to buy stable coins to finance US debt. China as a lab to test AI surveillance that cannot be tested in America. Chinese manufacturing — in America and Venezuela. This is not a trade deal. This is a restructuring of the entire global economy. China becomes the factory and the lab. America becomes the financier and the landlord. Both need each other to survive. That is the grand bargain.

Predictive History

77,548 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang: There’s a belief that somehow if we provided American chips to foreign countries — and specifically China — that the Chinese military would be building their military, building airplanes and aircraft carriers using American chips. First of all, they have plenty of their own chips, and their companies are formidable. The idea that China does not have a technology industry — we now know — is lunacy. Source: TIME
0:39

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang: There’s a belief that somehow if we provided American chips to foreign countries — and specifically China — that the Chinese military would be building their military, building airplanes and aircraft carriers using American chips. First of all, they have plenty of their own chips, and their companies are formidable. The idea that China does not have a technology industry — we now know — is lunacy. Source: TIME

Clash Report

62,118 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 SPEAKER JOHNSON DEFENDS TRUMP SELLING NVIDIA AI CHIPS TO CHINA: "IF WE DON'T, THEY'LL OVERTAKE US" Speaker Johnson explained Trump's decision to lift export controls allowing Nvidia to sell AI chips to approved Chinese customers, warning that blocking sales could allow China to overtake America's AI dominance: "China is a principal threat except for the national debt. I met with Jensen, the CEO of Nvidia. He has about 95% market share of AI. His argument is if he's not able to compete in China, then their system can overtake him and thus overtake the US. It's a delicate balance. We've got to treat China as the adversary that they are but also they're a really important trade partner." Source: Fox
1:31

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 SPEAKER JOHNSON DEFENDS TRUMP SELLING NVIDIA AI CHIPS TO CHINA: "IF WE DON'T, THEY'LL OVERTAKE US" Speaker Johnson explained Trump's decision to lift export controls allowing Nvidia to sell AI chips to approved Chinese customers, warning that blocking sales could allow China to overtake America's AI dominance: "China is a principal threat except for the national debt. I met with Jensen, the CEO of Nvidia. He has about 95% market share of AI. His argument is if he's not able to compete in China, then their system can overtake him and thus overtake the US. It's a delicate balance. We've got to treat China as the adversary that they are but also they're a really important trade partner." Source: Fox

Mario Nawfal

28,949 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Ingraham: Trump announced he's lifting some export controls on Nvidia allowing the chip maker to sell some products to approved customers in China. Why are we giving anything to China? Johnson: I met with Jenson, the CEO of Nvidia and the way he explains is he has about 95% market share effectively of AI. And with the chips and everything that is involved in that, his argument is if he's not able to compete in China, their system can over take him and thus the U.S.
1:38

Ingraham: Trump announced he's lifting some export controls on Nvidia allowing the chip maker to sell some products to approved customers in China. Why are we giving anything to China? Johnson: I met with Jenson, the CEO of Nvidia and the way he explains is he has about 95% market share effectively of AI. And with the chips and everything that is involved in that, his argument is if he's not able to compete in China, their system can over take him and thus the U.S.

Acyn

133,311 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

How does the U.S. win the AI race without tightening export controls on advanced AI chips to China? NVIDIA CEO: • China will not base its defense on Western tech • The Pentagon doesn’t use Chinese chips • China has domestic AI chips (Huawei, startups) and manufactures at scale, so its military has access • The U.S. needs a nuanced plan to stay ahead • Make the American tech stack the global standard • If others can’t build on the American stack, they’ll build on another stack • KPI David Sacks 5y → 80% = win; 20% = loss • China: 50% of AI researchers, 30% of the tech market, ~1B users • Cost of isolation: forfeits ~30% of the market, blocks diffusion of U.S. tech, concedes the rest of the world • President Trump wouldn’t view isolation as a winning strategy To win the AI race, the U.S. must lead with the best chips—and win developers and markets worldwide.
2:32

How does the U.S. win the AI race without tightening export controls on advanced AI chips to China? NVIDIA CEO: • China will not base its defense on Western tech • The Pentagon doesn’t use Chinese chips • China has domestic AI chips (Huawei, startups) and manufactures at scale, so its military has access • The U.S. needs a nuanced plan to stay ahead • Make the American tech stack the global standard • If others can’t build on the American stack, they’ll build on another stack • KPI David Sacks 5y → 80% = win; 20% = loss • China: 50% of AI researchers, 30% of the tech market, ~1B users • Cost of isolation: forfeits ~30% of the market, blocks diffusion of U.S. tech, concedes the rest of the world • President Trump wouldn’t view isolation as a winning strategy To win the AI race, the U.S. must lead with the best chips—and win developers and markets worldwide.

Ask Perplexity

156,952 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸 TRUMP: CHINA IS GOING TO TALK WITH NVIDIA ABOUT U.S. CHIP DEALS “We did discuss chips, and he’s going to be talking to Nvidia and others about taking chips. Look, we make great chips and Nvidia’s the leader, and I’ll be speaking to Jensen from Nvidia, but they’re going to be discussing that with Nvidia to see whether or not they can do it. I said, that’s really between you and Nvidia.” Source: The White House
0:51

🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸 TRUMP: CHINA IS GOING TO TALK WITH NVIDIA ABOUT U.S. CHIP DEALS “We did discuss chips, and he’s going to be talking to Nvidia and others about taking chips. Look, we make great chips and Nvidia’s the leader, and I’ll be speaking to Jensen from Nvidia, but they’re going to be discussing that with Nvidia to see whether or not they can do it. I said, that’s really between you and Nvidia.” Source: The White House

Mario Nawfal

240,579 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

NVIDIA CEO: “CHINA IS MOVING INCREDIBLY FAST IN AI” Jensen Huang said China is accelerating AI on all fronts - infrastructure, models, and real-world applications: "China is fast to both invent a new technology, but also to integrate the technology, to apply the technology. And because there's so much competition in China, everybody wants to build a great company and wants to succeed, a lot of great capabilities come out. And at the foundation of all of that is China's education system has produced some of the world's finest AI researchers - about 50% of the world's AI researchers are based here in China." Source:
1:40

NVIDIA CEO: “CHINA IS MOVING INCREDIBLY FAST IN AI” Jensen Huang said China is accelerating AI on all fronts - infrastructure, models, and real-world applications: "China is fast to both invent a new technology, but also to integrate the technology, to apply the technology. And because there's so much competition in China, everybody wants to build a great company and wants to succeed, a lot of great capabilities come out. And at the foundation of all of that is China's education system has produced some of the world's finest AI researchers - about 50% of the world's AI researchers are based here in China." Source:

Mario Nawfal

1,018,768 просмотров • 1 год назад

China is planning to spend around 2 trillion yuan ($295 billion) over the next five years to build data centers across the country At least 80% of all AI chips must come from domestic suppliers, primarily Huawei. Nvidia and AMD are locked out by design. Nvidia once held a 95% market share in China's AI market. Now? Zero. America did not lose China’s AI chip market because China “closed its doors,” but because America chose to weaponize chips, sanctions, export controls, entity lists, national security hysteria, and technological apartheid against its own largest customer. Washington took the world’s largest chip consumption market — a market that could have funded American semiconductor dominance for another generation — and taught it the most important lesson: Never let your future depend on a supplier that can be turned off by one paranoid empire. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do. It localized. It substituted. It built its own stack. It turned a customer relationship into a sovereignty project. And the same people who tried to choke Huawei are watching Huawei become the backbone of China’s AI infrastructure. This is a textbook own goal. America thought it was denying​ China the future. In reality, it compelled​ China to architect​ the future beyond​ America.
1:02

China is planning to spend around 2 trillion yuan ($295 billion) over the next five years to build data centers across the country At least 80% of all AI chips must come from domestic suppliers, primarily Huawei. Nvidia and AMD are locked out by design. Nvidia once held a 95% market share in China's AI market. Now? Zero. America did not lose China’s AI chip market because China “closed its doors,” but because America chose to weaponize chips, sanctions, export controls, entity lists, national security hysteria, and technological apartheid against its own largest customer. Washington took the world’s largest chip consumption market — a market that could have funded American semiconductor dominance for another generation — and taught it the most important lesson: Never let your future depend on a supplier that can be turned off by one paranoid empire. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do. It localized. It substituted. It built its own stack. It turned a customer relationship into a sovereignty project. And the same people who tried to choke Huawei are watching Huawei become the backbone of China’s AI infrastructure. This is a textbook own goal. America thought it was denying​ China the future. In reality, it compelled​ China to architect​ the future beyond​ America.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

36,767 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Nvidia continues to dominate the AI industry with record earnings, explosive data center growth, and massive demand for compute. But the bigger story is what’s happening globally behind the scenes. China is aggressively competing with the United States on AI infrastructure, power generation, and data center expansion and they don’t want to rely on American chips to do it. This is no longer just about stocks it’s a global race for AI dominance.
1:15

Nvidia continues to dominate the AI industry with record earnings, explosive data center growth, and massive demand for compute. But the bigger story is what’s happening globally behind the scenes. China is aggressively competing with the United States on AI infrastructure, power generation, and data center expansion and they don’t want to rely on American chips to do it. This is no longer just about stocks it’s a global race for AI dominance.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

12,462 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 BREAKING 🇨🇳🇺🇸 CHINA JUST COMPLETELY BANNED NVIDIA CHIPS BEIJING HAS CANCELED THE GREEN LIGHT FOR TOP CHINESE COMPANIES TO BUY $NVDA CHIPS THE MESSAGE IS CLEAR CHINA DOES NOT WANT TO DEPEND ON U.S. SEMICONDUCTORS ANYMORE THEY WOULD RATHER BUILD THEIR OWN AI SUPPLY CHAIN THAN BUY FROM AMERICA THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT NVIDIA THIS IS ABOUT CHINA CUTTING THE U.S. OUT OF ITS AI FUTURE $NVDA IS GETTING HIT HARD AND THE TRADE WAR JUST ENTERED A NEW PHASE
0:20

🚨 BREAKING 🇨🇳🇺🇸 CHINA JUST COMPLETELY BANNED NVIDIA CHIPS BEIJING HAS CANCELED THE GREEN LIGHT FOR TOP CHINESE COMPANIES TO BUY $NVDA CHIPS THE MESSAGE IS CLEAR CHINA DOES NOT WANT TO DEPEND ON U.S. SEMICONDUCTORS ANYMORE THEY WOULD RATHER BUILD THEIR OWN AI SUPPLY CHAIN THAN BUY FROM AMERICA THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT NVIDIA THIS IS ABOUT CHINA CUTTING THE U.S. OUT OF ITS AI FUTURE $NVDA IS GETTING HIT HARD AND THE TRADE WAR JUST ENTERED A NEW PHASE

Leshka.eth ⛩

99,917 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Jensen Huang just made the case for American empire. Said it plain. Didn’t flinch. Didn’t walk it back. And almost nobody caught what he actually admitted. Jensen Huang: “The amount of compute in the United States is a hundred times more than anywhere else in the world.” One hundred times. That is not a market lead. That is a monopoly on the future of intelligence. The kind that compounds every six months until no one else can close the distance. Jensen Huang: “We make sure that the US labs are the first to hear about it and the first chance to buy it.” Every chip Nvidia designs. Every architecture they ship. America gets first access. Everyone else gets what is left. That is not a sales strategy. That is arms distribution with a quarterly earnings call. Jensen Huang: “And if they don’t have enough money, we even invest in them.” The company building the weapons is bankrolling the people who fire them. Nvidia is no longer a public company. It is a state instrument with a stock ticker. Jensen Huang: “Why would you want the United States to give up the world?” The CEO of the most valuable hardware company on earth did not hedge that. Did not qualify it. He said it like it was obvious. Because to him, it is. Nations used to be measured by steel output. Then oil reserves. Then warhead count. Now it is how much intelligence they can produce per second. Compute is no longer a commodity. It is a strategic resource. Like uranium in 1944. Except this one doubles faster than anyone can respond. Europe understands none of this. They are drafting AI regulations. Compliance frameworks. Ethics panels. Risk tiers. They are bringing paperwork to a physics war. You cannot govern intelligence you do not have the silicon to produce. China gets it. That is why they are building fabs, not filing comment periods. Nvidia already made sure the gap is not annual. It is generational. Silicon Valley still thinks it is building consumer software. Huang just told them they are building American infrastructure. Every model trained here runs on machines that exist nowhere else. Every company that scales here scales on silicon no rival can touch. The world thinks Nvidia sells chips. Nvidia sells the ability to think. And they only sell it under one flag.
0:42

Jensen Huang just made the case for American empire. Said it plain. Didn’t flinch. Didn’t walk it back. And almost nobody caught what he actually admitted. Jensen Huang: “The amount of compute in the United States is a hundred times more than anywhere else in the world.” One hundred times. That is not a market lead. That is a monopoly on the future of intelligence. The kind that compounds every six months until no one else can close the distance. Jensen Huang: “We make sure that the US labs are the first to hear about it and the first chance to buy it.” Every chip Nvidia designs. Every architecture they ship. America gets first access. Everyone else gets what is left. That is not a sales strategy. That is arms distribution with a quarterly earnings call. Jensen Huang: “And if they don’t have enough money, we even invest in them.” The company building the weapons is bankrolling the people who fire them. Nvidia is no longer a public company. It is a state instrument with a stock ticker. Jensen Huang: “Why would you want the United States to give up the world?” The CEO of the most valuable hardware company on earth did not hedge that. Did not qualify it. He said it like it was obvious. Because to him, it is. Nations used to be measured by steel output. Then oil reserves. Then warhead count. Now it is how much intelligence they can produce per second. Compute is no longer a commodity. It is a strategic resource. Like uranium in 1944. Except this one doubles faster than anyone can respond. Europe understands none of this. They are drafting AI regulations. Compliance frameworks. Ethics panels. Risk tiers. They are bringing paperwork to a physics war. You cannot govern intelligence you do not have the silicon to produce. China gets it. That is why they are building fabs, not filing comment periods. Nvidia already made sure the gap is not annual. It is generational. Silicon Valley still thinks it is building consumer software. Huang just told them they are building American infrastructure. Every model trained here runs on machines that exist nowhere else. Every company that scales here scales on silicon no rival can touch. The world thinks Nvidia sells chips. Nvidia sells the ability to think. And they only sell it under one flag.

Dustin

57,059 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

NVIDIA CEO, Jensen Huang, warns that America's lead in AI is far from secure. He breaks down the US-China AI competition into what he calls a "five-layer cake." And while the US dominates some layers, Jensen sees critical vulnerabilities in others... 1) Energy: China has twice as much as the US despite a smaller economy. Which "makes no sense" to Jensen. 2) Chips: The US is "generations ahead," but Jensen warns against complacency. "Anybody who thinks China can't manufacture is missing the big idea." 3) Infrastructure: Standing up a data center in the US takes about three years. In China? "They can build a hospital in a weekend." 4) Models: US frontier models are "unquestionably world class," but "China is well ahead, way ahead on open source." 5) Applications: Public sentiment differs sharply. Ask both populations whether AI will do more good than harm, and "in their case 80% would say AI will do more good than harm. In our case, it'd be the other way around." Jensen's warning is clear. Leading in chips and frontier models isn't enough when you're behind on energy, infrastructure speed, open source, and public trust. Winning the AI race requires strength across the entire stack, and right now, the US has work to do.
1:39

NVIDIA CEO, Jensen Huang, warns that America's lead in AI is far from secure. He breaks down the US-China AI competition into what he calls a "five-layer cake." And while the US dominates some layers, Jensen sees critical vulnerabilities in others... 1) Energy: China has twice as much as the US despite a smaller economy. Which "makes no sense" to Jensen. 2) Chips: The US is "generations ahead," but Jensen warns against complacency. "Anybody who thinks China can't manufacture is missing the big idea." 3) Infrastructure: Standing up a data center in the US takes about three years. In China? "They can build a hospital in a weekend." 4) Models: US frontier models are "unquestionably world class," but "China is well ahead, way ahead on open source." 5) Applications: Public sentiment differs sharply. Ask both populations whether AI will do more good than harm, and "in their case 80% would say AI will do more good than harm. In our case, it'd be the other way around." Jensen's warning is clear. Leading in chips and frontier models isn't enough when you're behind on energy, infrastructure speed, open source, and public trust. Winning the AI race requires strength across the entire stack, and right now, the US has work to do.

Big Brain AI

59,540 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

China is on the verge of cracking the US's advanced microchip monopoly. Behind the scenes, Americans are PANICKING. And that's why they issued an insane "order" last week, saying that NO ONE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD (including China) is allowed to use the Huawei Ascend microchip. The US has a long record of arguing that they have a legal right to control use or sales of anything anywhere in the world that may have an American element in its development history. . HERE'S THE STORY The US is keeping a tight hold on advanced microchips from Taiwan, China—including the super-powerful Nvidia chips necessary for AI. So the Chinese company Huawei developed a way of linking less advanced chips together to replicate (and even beat) the computing power of the Nvidia chip, 300 petaflops to 180 petaflops. Chinese nerds did this by using optical connections to make instantaneous transmission between 384 chips. The result was the CloudMatrix 384, which delivers MORE computing power than the top Nvidia chip. But the US says that the Huawei chips inside it include elements, or chiplets, from TSMC in the Chinese province of Taiwan, and will make sure these are not available any more. Now mainland China needs to develop its own chiplets, which won't be easy. . WHO WILL WIN? Top experts like William Huo (whose background is Intel Inc) say we should be rooting for China. That's because the US says it in this fight to maintain global AI dominance, while China will share the breakthrough with the world to create a fairer, safer planet. Who will win this battle? This story is unfolding in real time.
5:04

China is on the verge of cracking the US's advanced microchip monopoly. Behind the scenes, Americans are PANICKING. And that's why they issued an insane "order" last week, saying that NO ONE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD (including China) is allowed to use the Huawei Ascend microchip. The US has a long record of arguing that they have a legal right to control use or sales of anything anywhere in the world that may have an American element in its development history. . HERE'S THE STORY The US is keeping a tight hold on advanced microchips from Taiwan, China—including the super-powerful Nvidia chips necessary for AI. So the Chinese company Huawei developed a way of linking less advanced chips together to replicate (and even beat) the computing power of the Nvidia chip, 300 petaflops to 180 petaflops. Chinese nerds did this by using optical connections to make instantaneous transmission between 384 chips. The result was the CloudMatrix 384, which delivers MORE computing power than the top Nvidia chip. But the US says that the Huawei chips inside it include elements, or chiplets, from TSMC in the Chinese province of Taiwan, and will make sure these are not available any more. Now mainland China needs to develop its own chiplets, which won't be easy. . WHO WILL WIN? Top experts like William Huo (whose background is Intel Inc) say we should be rooting for China. That's because the US says it in this fight to maintain global AI dominance, while China will share the breakthrough with the world to create a fairer, safer planet. Who will win this battle? This story is unfolding in real time.

Nury Vittachi

28,460 просмотров • 1 год назад

We are in a technological war with China, we really are. There are three countries that spend the most on AI. Number one is the US, number two is China, number three is the UAE. The UAE is friendly to the US, they work on American chips, they work with Nvidia. And so if we didn't give them chips and we starved them from technology, they would simply buy them from Huawei. The problem with that is that the chip is the queen bee. You set a chip out into the ecosphere, all the honeybees gather around it, they're the programmers, and they make the honey, they write the code, they create the value of the hive. Every time the queen bee's DNA is upgraded, all the other bees know how to write that code and make that honey. Do we want American honey out there or do we want Chinese honey?
2:09

We are in a technological war with China, we really are. There are three countries that spend the most on AI. Number one is the US, number two is China, number three is the UAE. The UAE is friendly to the US, they work on American chips, they work with Nvidia. And so if we didn't give them chips and we starved them from technology, they would simply buy them from Huawei. The problem with that is that the chip is the queen bee. You set a chip out into the ecosphere, all the honeybees gather around it, they're the programmers, and they make the honey, they write the code, they create the value of the hive. Every time the queen bee's DNA is upgraded, all the other bees know how to write that code and make that honey. Do we want American honey out there or do we want Chinese honey?

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

24,193 просмотров • 1 год назад