Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Jensen made the rounds recently, saying that people shouldn't need to learn how to code to program in the future. I agree: Coding is incidental to programming, which is the act of solving problems. Programmers will instead be orchestrating AIs. An excerpt from my TED AI talk.

Amjad Masad

480,453 subscribers

83,265 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Amjad Masad

Amjad Masadvor 2 Jahren

Full thing

Profilbild von Michael Tastad

Michael Tastadvor 2 Jahren

Meaning the computer science degree and understanding architecture is important, and understanding proper indentation less so. Lowers the entry bar but raises the ceiling.

Profilbild von مشاري

مشاريvor 2 Jahren

Basically we won’t need to remember the syntax. But we need to understand the logic.

Profilbild von Cryptonian

Cryptonianvor 2 Jahren

Its like we dont need to code in assembly.. yes, mostly do not.. much of SW engineering happens on higher abstraction layers.. but assembly is still there deep inside, handling by niche.. I think instead, AI will be another higher level abstraction above coding..

Profilbild von Ishan

Ishanvor 2 Jahren

Software is a tool; the end goal is always to build something that people love. If we can find that, can’t GPT-5, GPT-6 level AI just write the whole code itself?

Profilbild von Marius Lian

Marius Lianvor 2 Jahren

But AI's would be orchestrated by code because natural language will never be efficient enough for larger systems.

Profilbild von dizstorder

dizstordervor 2 Jahren

ais will be orchestrating ais even

Profilbild von positiveblue ⚡️🍠

positiveblue ⚡️🍠vor 2 Jahren

You may enjoy this short article about the topic by @pol_avec

Profilbild von radcraftor

radcraftorvor 2 Jahren

Knowing how to orchestrate the AI will need the foundation of code to be clear for the programmer. Kinda first principles here :)

Ähnliche Videos

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang says AI could expand coding from 30 million programmers to 1 billion people “The definition of coding as of today is simply specifying” “I think we just went from 30 million to probably 1 billion” “Every carpenter in the future will be a coder”

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang says AI could expand coding from 30 million programmers to 1 billion people “The definition of coding as of today is simply specifying” “I think we just went from 30 million to probably 1 billion” “Every carpenter in the future will be a coder”

Vadim

25,765 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Anthropic Boris Cherny says the role of programmers is shifting from writing code to orchestrating agents "it's more about reviewing code than writing code" complex tasks still require manual coding, but those windows are shrinking. eventually, managing agents will become the core of programming

Anthropic Boris Cherny says the role of programmers is shifting from writing code to orchestrating agents "it's more about reviewing code than writing code" complex tasks still require manual coding, but those windows are shrinking. eventually, managing agents will become the core of programming

Haider.

137,906 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The future of coding is agentic. With Replit AI, every frustrating aspect of programming will melt away, so that you and your team can focus on solving the complex problems that matter.

The future of coding is agentic. With Replit AI, every frustrating aspect of programming will melt away, so that you and your team can focus on solving the complex problems that matter.

Replit ⠕

16,433 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Boris Cherny (Creator of Claude Code): "The one technical book I would recommend to everyone that has had the greatest impact on me as an engineer is functional programming in Scala. You're probably never going to use Scala day today, but the way it teaches you to think about coding problems is just such a change from the way that most people were in coding, either practically or in school. It's just. It's incredible. It's going to completely change the way that you code now. I think in types, when I code, the thing that matters in your code the most is the type signatures. This is more important than the code itself." Boris Cherny

Boris Cherny (Creator of Claude Code): "The one technical book I would recommend to everyone that has had the greatest impact on me as an engineer is functional programming in Scala. You're probably never going to use Scala day today, but the way it teaches you to think about coding problems is just such a change from the way that most people were in coding, either practically or in school. It's just. It's incredible. It's going to completely change the way that you code now. I think in types, when I code, the thing that matters in your code the most is the type signatures. This is more important than the code itself." Boris Cherny

Ryan Peterman

365,032 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jensen Huang built the world's most valuable chip company and is telling the next generation of programmers prompt engineering is the future: "Why program in Python? So weird." "The first time I talk to the computer, I'm just speaking in plain English." "English, by the way, human, it's the best programming language of the future." "How do you make a computer do what you want it to do? How do you fine tune the instructions with that computer? That's called prompt engineering. There's an artistry to that." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

Jensen Huang built the world's most valuable chip company and is telling the next generation of programmers prompt engineering is the future: "Why program in Python? So weird." "The first time I talk to the computer, I'm just speaking in plain English." "English, by the way, human, it's the best programming language of the future." "How do you make a computer do what you want it to do? How do you fine tune the instructions with that computer? That's called prompt engineering. There's an artistry to that." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

Uncover AI

36,137 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Marc Andreessen: AI coding doesn’t eliminate programmers — it redefines them. The job is no longer typing code line by line, it’s orchestrating 10 coding bots in parallel, arguing with them, debugging their output, changing the spec, and pushing them toward the right result. But here’s the catch: if you don’t understand how to write code yourself, you can’t evaluate what the AI gives you. The next layer of programming isn’t writing scripts — it’s supervising AI that writes them. Today’s best programmers spend their day jumping between terminals, managing multiple coding bots, fixing mistakes, and refining instructions. The irony? You still need deep fundamentals, because without them, you won’t know when the AI is wrong. The job of the programmer has changed. Now it’s about arguing with coding bots, debugging AI-generated code, and understanding why something doesn’t work or isn’t fast enough. AI abstracts the work — but only people who truly understand code can tell if the abstraction is doing the right thing. Programmers aren’t going away — they’re becoming 10x, 100x, even 1,000x more productive. Tasks are changing, the job is changing, but humans are still overseeing the process, evaluating results, fixing errors, and making judgment calls. AI changes how we code, not who is responsible. The future programmer isn’t replaced by AI — they’re upgraded by it. You still need to learn how to write and understand code, because when the AI gets it wrong, humans are the ones who have to know why. That up-leveling of capability is the real revolution.

Marc Andreessen: AI coding doesn’t eliminate programmers — it redefines them. The job is no longer typing code line by line, it’s orchestrating 10 coding bots in parallel, arguing with them, debugging their output, changing the spec, and pushing them toward the right result. But here’s the catch: if you don’t understand how to write code yourself, you can’t evaluate what the AI gives you. The next layer of programming isn’t writing scripts — it’s supervising AI that writes them. Today’s best programmers spend their day jumping between terminals, managing multiple coding bots, fixing mistakes, and refining instructions. The irony? You still need deep fundamentals, because without them, you won’t know when the AI is wrong. The job of the programmer has changed. Now it’s about arguing with coding bots, debugging AI-generated code, and understanding why something doesn’t work or isn’t fast enough. AI abstracts the work — but only people who truly understand code can tell if the abstraction is doing the right thing. Programmers aren’t going away — they’re becoming 10x, 100x, even 1,000x more productive. Tasks are changing, the job is changing, but humans are still overseeing the process, evaluating results, fixing errors, and making judgment calls. AI changes how we code, not who is responsible. The future programmer isn’t replaced by AI — they’re upgraded by it. You still need to learn how to write and understand code, because when the AI gets it wrong, humans are the ones who have to know why. That up-leveling of capability is the real revolution.

Ian Miles

913,373 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Despite the fact that most of these people who claim to be Jews are the people of the World today, we need to learn from what this Rabbi is saying…

Despite the fact that most of these people who claim to be Jews are the people of the World today, we need to learn from what this Rabbi is saying…

Typical African

15,643 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

The recording of my full 45-min talk on my vibe coding process is up! I go through the behind-the-scenes of how I get product ideas, how I talk to coding agents, how to prevent AI slop in design, and more (YouTube link in comment)

The recording of my full 45-min talk on my vibe coding process is up! I go through the behind-the-scenes of how I get product ideas, how I talk to coding agents, how to prevent AI slop in design, and more (YouTube link in comment)

Zara Zhang

32,815 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jensen Huang says, In the future, we will be able to talk to a protein We'll ask it: "what are you? are you soluble? how do you react to heat or chemicals?" This is how AI can talk to an image today, and how we've moved from only processing data to actually understanding it

Jensen Huang says, In the future, we will be able to talk to a protein We'll ask it: "what are you? are you soluble? how do you react to heat or chemicals?" This is how AI can talk to an image today, and how we've moved from only processing data to actually understanding it

Haider.

149,843 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Marc Andreessen explains why AI coding won't replace programmers, but fundamentally change what they do. He argues that AI coding is just the latest abstraction layer, and the job of a programmer has always evolved with each one. Andreessen's key reframe of what's actually happening: "AI coding actually abstracts away the process of actually writing the scripting code... This is the next layer of the task redefinition under the job of programmer." He's clear that the best programmers aren't being replaced. They're already adapting, even if their day-to-day looks radically different now. Their job has shifted from writing code line by line to managing dozens of AI agents working in parallel. "The world's best programmers today will tell you, 'My job is I'm sitting there and I'm orchestrating 10 code bots running in parallel.' Their day job now is kind of arguing with the AI bots to try to get them to write the right code." But Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 is adamant this doesn't make foundational knowledge obsolete — it makes it more important. "You need to still fully understand and learn how to write and understand code, because if it doesn't work or it's not doing what you expect, you need to be able to understand the results of what the AI is giving you." He draws a direct parallel: Just as someone writing scripting languages still needs to understand how a microprocessor works, someone orchestrating AI bots needs to understand the code those bots produce. "It's this upleveling of capability where you actually want the depth to go down and understand what the thing is actually doing, even if you're not spending your day doing that by hand." The result, in his view, is transformative: "Now programmers are going to be 10 times or 100 times or a thousand times more productive. And that is overwhelmingly a good thing." The pattern: New abstraction layer emerges → tasks change → the job gets redefined upward → productivity explodes It raises a question every programmer should be sitting with... Are you building the depth to evaluate what AI gives you, or just accepting the output?

Marc Andreessen explains why AI coding won't replace programmers, but fundamentally change what they do. He argues that AI coding is just the latest abstraction layer, and the job of a programmer has always evolved with each one. Andreessen's key reframe of what's actually happening: "AI coding actually abstracts away the process of actually writing the scripting code... This is the next layer of the task redefinition under the job of programmer." He's clear that the best programmers aren't being replaced. They're already adapting, even if their day-to-day looks radically different now. Their job has shifted from writing code line by line to managing dozens of AI agents working in parallel. "The world's best programmers today will tell you, 'My job is I'm sitting there and I'm orchestrating 10 code bots running in parallel.' Their day job now is kind of arguing with the AI bots to try to get them to write the right code." But Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 is adamant this doesn't make foundational knowledge obsolete — it makes it more important. "You need to still fully understand and learn how to write and understand code, because if it doesn't work or it's not doing what you expect, you need to be able to understand the results of what the AI is giving you." He draws a direct parallel: Just as someone writing scripting languages still needs to understand how a microprocessor works, someone orchestrating AI bots needs to understand the code those bots produce. "It's this upleveling of capability where you actually want the depth to go down and understand what the thing is actually doing, even if you're not spending your day doing that by hand." The result, in his view, is transformative: "Now programmers are going to be 10 times or 100 times or a thousand times more productive. And that is overwhelmingly a good thing." The pattern: New abstraction layer emerges → tasks change → the job gets redefined upward → productivity explodes It raises a question every programmer should be sitting with... Are you building the depth to evaluate what AI gives you, or just accepting the output?

Big Brain AI

45,341 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨ZUCK: "Probably in 2025, Meta, as well as other companies, will have an AI that can effectively be a mid-level engineer that you have at your company that can write code. In the beginning that will be very expensive to run, then at some point a lot of the code we have in our apps will be built by AI engineers instead of people engineers. In my opinion that will augment the people working on it. My view is that in the future people will be so much more creative and freed up to do crazy things."

🚨ZUCK: "Probably in 2025, Meta, as well as other companies, will have an AI that can effectively be a mid-level engineer that you have at your company that can write code. In the beginning that will be very expensive to run, then at some point a lot of the code we have in our apps will be built by AI engineers instead of people engineers. In my opinion that will augment the people working on it. My view is that in the future people will be so much more creative and freed up to do crazy things."

Autism Capital 🧩

1,666,526 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Introducing "codebase to course", a skill that turns any codebase into an interactive coding course So that you can learn coding through your own projects, complete with visualization, plain-English code translations, metaphors, even quizzes... I vibe code a lot but have no idea how the code works under the hood. This is how I think "learning to code" should be in the AI age: Build first, learn later Link below

Introducing "codebase to course", a skill that turns any codebase into an interactive coding course So that you can learn coding through your own projects, complete with visualization, plain-English code translations, metaphors, even quizzes... I vibe code a lot but have no idea how the code works under the hood. This is how I think "learning to code" should be in the AI age: Build first, learn later Link below

Zara Zhang

208,347 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"Everybody thought software programming was the ultimate “smart” profession. Look what one of the first things AI is solving: software programming." ~ Jensen Huang defines smartness in the AI era "I know what people are thinking: the definition of smart is someone who’s intelligent, solves problems, and is technical. But I find that’s a commodity. We’re about to prove that artificial intelligence can handle that part easily, right? My personal definition of smart is someone who sits at the intersection of being technically astute, having human empathy, and having the ability to infer the unspoken, the “around the corners,” the unknowables." --- From 'A Bit Personal with Jodi Shelton' YT channel

"Everybody thought software programming was the ultimate “smart” profession. Look what one of the first things AI is solving: software programming." ~ Jensen Huang defines smartness in the AI era "I know what people are thinking: the definition of smart is someone who’s intelligent, solves problems, and is technical. But I find that’s a commodity. We’re about to prove that artificial intelligence can handle that part easily, right? My personal definition of smart is someone who sits at the intersection of being technically astute, having human empathy, and having the ability to infer the unspoken, the “around the corners,” the unknowables." --- From 'A Bit Personal with Jodi Shelton' YT channel

Rohan Paul

29,526 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

ELON MUSK: "Having a child is an act of optimism about the future. We need to give people a sense of optimism and excitement about the future, and I believe that the future will be better than the past, and they'll be more interested in having kids."

ELON MUSK: "Having a child is an act of optimism about the future. We need to give people a sense of optimism and excitement about the future, and I believe that the future will be better than the past, and they'll be more interested in having kids."

DogeDesigner

21,635,459 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ka’aji: “I believe there is no such thing as a limited attack. Any act of aggression will be considered an act of aggression, period, and every country will respond to such an act as part of its natural right to self-defense, and powerfully. That is what we will do.” “I think it is fairly clear that the central part of such an agreement will be the lifting of sanctions, which must be carried out by the U.S. On the other hand, there will be clear steps from Iran to ensure that its nuclear program never becomes military.”

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ka’aji: “I believe there is no such thing as a limited attack. Any act of aggression will be considered an act of aggression, period, and every country will respond to such an act as part of its natural right to self-defense, and powerfully. That is what we will do.” “I think it is fairly clear that the central part of such an agreement will be the lifting of sanctions, which must be carried out by the U.S. On the other hand, there will be clear steps from Iran to ensure that its nuclear program never becomes military.”

Open Source Intel

31,649 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“The next programming language is English.” Amjad Masad, CEO of Replit, and Matthew Berman on why AI coding is history repeating itself: “Computer science is pop culture. We don’t pay enough attention to our own history.” (as Alan Kay famously put it) “Before compilers, people didn’t even call it coding. You literally rewired machines to run software.” “Grace Hopper invented the compiler because she wanted people to program in English.” “She said specialists would still exist, but programming should be accessible to millions.” “That’s basically vibe coding.” “She was saying it decades ago: the next hot programming language is English.”

“The next programming language is English.” Amjad Masad, CEO of Replit, and Matthew Berman on why AI coding is history repeating itself: “Computer science is pop culture. We don’t pay enough attention to our own history.” (as Alan Kay famously put it) “Before compilers, people didn’t even call it coding. You literally rewired machines to run software.” “Grace Hopper invented the compiler because she wanted people to program in English.” “She said specialists would still exist, but programming should be accessible to millions.” “That’s basically vibe coding.” “She was saying it decades ago: the next hot programming language is English.”

Forward Future

24,658 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

I watched Jensen Huang being asked who the smartest person he’s ever met was. He smiled — and refused to answer. Instead, he questioned the question itself. He said what we call “smart” — coding, solving complex problems, optimizing systems — is quickly becoming commoditized. AI already does that better. That struck me. Because it means intelligence is no longer about how fast we think — but how deeply we understand. Jensen said the future belongs to those with emotional depth, adaptability, critical thinking, and the ability to navigate ambiguity. I couldn’t agree more. In a world where machines learn patterns, humans must learn perspective. Maybe being smart isn’t about knowing more… It’s about feeling and deciding better. What do you think — are we ready to redefine intelligence for the AI age? #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Leadership #Technology #FutureOfWork #EmotionalIntelligence #Innovation #Mindfulness #HumanInTheLoop #AIandHumanity

I watched Jensen Huang being asked who the smartest person he’s ever met was. He smiled — and refused to answer. Instead, he questioned the question itself. He said what we call “smart” — coding, solving complex problems, optimizing systems — is quickly becoming commoditized. AI already does that better. That struck me. Because it means intelligence is no longer about how fast we think — but how deeply we understand. Jensen said the future belongs to those with emotional depth, adaptability, critical thinking, and the ability to navigate ambiguity. I couldn’t agree more. In a world where machines learn patterns, humans must learn perspective. Maybe being smart isn’t about knowing more… It’s about feeling and deciding better. What do you think — are we ready to redefine intelligence for the AI age? #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Leadership #Technology #FutureOfWork #EmotionalIntelligence #Innovation #Mindfulness #HumanInTheLoop #AIandHumanity

Pascal Bornet

80,254 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Jensen Huang says nothing would give him more joy than if none of his engineers were coding at all. Instead, they’re just solving undiscovered problems. His framework is 'Purpose vs Task' - coding is just a task, that should be minimized (ideally to 0).

Jensen Huang says nothing would give him more joy than if none of his engineers were coding at all. Instead, they’re just solving undiscovered problems. His framework is 'Purpose vs Task' - coding is just a task, that should be minimized (ideally to 0).

Rohan Paul

286,502 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten