Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Jessica Burbank joined The Majority Report to break down her Drop Site investigation into how Flock Safety, a $7.5 billion surveillance giant, quietly secured a $2.1 million contract in Scarsdale with zero public input. She explains how local officials coordinated with Flock behind closed doors, approved the deal in... 35 seconds, and nearly installed a mass-surveillance network without residents knowing. Burbank’s report exposes how a national mass-surveillance system is being built one quiet municipal contract at a time, often without public consent or legal safeguards. She also details how Flock’s tools enable retroactive tracking, ICE investigations, abortion prosecutions, and sprawling police data-sharing – all expanding far beyond what communities are told. Read the report at the link below. Jessica Burbank | Majority Reportshow more

Drop Site

481,395 subscribers

24,566 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Comments

Drop Site10 months ago

Read the report here:

Dr Subroto Roy10 months ago

License plate #ai data was used by the 🇮🇱 junta to assassinate Palestinian doctors academics journalists with their families during #GazaGenocide‌ ... What say you @PalantirTech @peterthiel ?

BS10 months ago

lol a company CEO signing justifications declaring themselves the only capable source. So stupid it might be genius. Are there no contracting officers at state level, or why were just the mayor and police chief doing market research? (or not really doing market research)

Ayesha de Queiroz10 months ago

Jessica Burbank believes in the junk science of the transgender industrial complex and promotes it, she’s a fantasist with garbage judgement and discernment. If one cannot discern biological reality because of a billionaire backed marketing campaign, one cannot trust their work.

James M. Stone10 months ago

😊

AM’S10 months ago

I heard about this going to Colorado and it is not cool

Sophie 🇵🇷🇩🇴10 months ago

@majorityfm I think Nassau County in Long Island is next

Ayesha de Queiroz10 months ago

Emma Vigeland is one of the dumbest pundits on the air. Why are you repeating the mistakes of The Intercept by platforming morons who cannot discern reality? Not only Krystal Ball, but you professionally affiliate with a group of the dumbest women in media. 🤡

Related Videos

Across U.S. cities, mass surveillance is quietly expanding at a rapid pace. In Denver, residents packed a town hall to oppose the city’s partnership with Flock Safety, whose cameras scan and store data from every passing vehicle. Critics say the system violates the Fourth Amendment and gives police and private companies unprecedented access to people’s movements. Despite clear opposition, Mayor Mike Johnston renewed Denver’s contract last month, adding only limited data protections while keeping the surveillance network in place. Organizers warn that Denver’s fight reflects a national trend, where claims of “public safety” are being used to justify an ever-growing infrastructure of monitoring and control.

Across U.S. cities, mass surveillance is quietly expanding at a rapid pace. In Denver, residents packed a town hall to oppose the city’s partnership with Flock Safety, whose cameras scan and store data from every passing vehicle. Critics say the system violates the Fourth Amendment and gives police and private companies unprecedented access to people’s movements. Despite clear opposition, Mayor Mike Johnston renewed Denver’s contract last month, adding only limited data protections while keeping the surveillance network in place. Organizers warn that Denver’s fight reflects a national trend, where claims of “public safety” are being used to justify an ever-growing infrastructure of monitoring and control.

BreakThrough News

17,689 views • 11 months ago

UK’s £1 Billion PHONE SURVEILLANCE PLAN & Canada’s Quiet TEST RUN “For Your Safety” The UK just dropped a £1 BILLION pandemic plan that turns Big Tech into a mass location tracking network and Canada is heading down the exact same road. The UK Health Security Agency wants real-time location data, AI alerts, and deep partnerships with Silicon Valley to monitor your every move in the next "emergency." Targeted for 2030 rollout. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth discusses how Canada also went from Covid-19(84) alert apps and ArriveCAN to expanding digital ID systems and how the infrastructure for always-on surveillance is quietly being built on both sides of the Atlantic.

UK’s £1 Billion PHONE SURVEILLANCE PLAN & Canada’s Quiet TEST RUN “For Your Safety” The UK just dropped a £1 BILLION pandemic plan that turns Big Tech into a mass location tracking network and Canada is heading down the exact same road. The UK Health Security Agency wants real-time location data, AI alerts, and deep partnerships with Silicon Valley to monitor your every move in the next "emergency." Targeted for 2030 rollout. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth discusses how Canada also went from Covid-19(84) alert apps and ArriveCAN to expanding digital ID systems and how the infrastructure for always-on surveillance is quietly being built on both sides of the Atlantic.

Dan Dicks

21,196 views • 6 months ago

WOW 🚨 Records requests show The city of Fullerton, California secretly approved Flock Cameras without a single public hearing or notice to the public, they approved it under a separate project name - The city signed a contract with Glassbox Digital - A calendar item for a contract with Glassbox Digital appeared on the agenda, it did not mention Flock - The details of that item involved an agenda item ‘Peregrine Services’ - Peregrine offered a Fullerton crimes data center that would integrate data from body-worn cameras, automatic license plate readers, utility systems and Flock Safety cameras - The item passed unanimously on the consent calendar with no discussion, no questions - This authorized Flock under a 5 year contract for $750,000 - The police chief then authorized Flock a 5 year term that auto renews every 2 years without a single vote or any public input This is how they secretly approved flock cameras without ever notifying the public or allowing a single question to be asked…. “That's how it got here. We got Flock because council rubber-stamped a consent calendar item that was never talked about with the public, that never mentioned Flock to the public, that never brought up any details with the public” “I'd actually like to point out Mrs. Charles over here because I find it laughable that you would go to No Kings protest to fight against tyranny and rubber-stamp the surveillance state of our citizenry without asking a single question about how the data is held, who it's given to, who has access to it, who does and does not weaponize it. Because there's an old Soviet proverb that says, "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime." And that's why these systems are being built. So shame on the council at the time and shame on everybody who pretends to care about our rights who did nothing about it” The Fullerton police department claims there are only 19 flock cameras but independent organizations claim the number is much higher, they believe the real number is closer to 52 flock cameras

WOW 🚨 Records requests show The city of Fullerton, California secretly approved Flock Cameras without a single public hearing or notice to the public, they approved it under a separate project name - The city signed a contract with Glassbox Digital - A calendar item for a contract with Glassbox Digital appeared on the agenda, it did not mention Flock - The details of that item involved an agenda item ‘Peregrine Services’ - Peregrine offered a Fullerton crimes data center that would integrate data from body-worn cameras, automatic license plate readers, utility systems and Flock Safety cameras - The item passed unanimously on the consent calendar with no discussion, no questions - This authorized Flock under a 5 year contract for $750,000 - The police chief then authorized Flock a 5 year term that auto renews every 2 years without a single vote or any public input This is how they secretly approved flock cameras without ever notifying the public or allowing a single question to be asked…. “That's how it got here. We got Flock because council rubber-stamped a consent calendar item that was never talked about with the public, that never mentioned Flock to the public, that never brought up any details with the public” “I'd actually like to point out Mrs. Charles over here because I find it laughable that you would go to No Kings protest to fight against tyranny and rubber-stamp the surveillance state of our citizenry without asking a single question about how the data is held, who it's given to, who has access to it, who does and does not weaponize it. Because there's an old Soviet proverb that says, "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime." And that's why these systems are being built. So shame on the council at the time and shame on everybody who pretends to care about our rights who did nothing about it” The Fullerton police department claims there are only 19 flock cameras but independent organizations claim the number is much higher, they believe the real number is closer to 52 flock cameras

Wall Street Apes

105,323 views • 1 month ago

This is horrifying and every American needs to hear this California resident exposes what’s really going on with Flock Cameras in America “I want to be clear what these cameras actually are, and I say that with somebody with 20 years of experience in IT. I've served as the chief network architect for Fortune 500 companies, I've designed data centers, and today I work on cloud infrastructure for one of the largest loan origination companies in the country. I'm not speculating on how this technology works. I've read their patents and I know how it works. Flock advertises these cameras as simple license plate readers. But their own patents tell a different story. They're AI-powered surveillance machines that capture every passing vehicle and person and transmit that data to a private corporate cloud, making it queryable by a multitude of state and federal agencies. The city of Corona does not control that database, and Corona residents have no public record rights against a private company's servers. Our daily movements are being harvested by a $7.5 billion corporation, that only answers to venture capital investors, not to us. Flock did not reach that valuation on their per-camera subscription fees. That math doesn't add up The city council should also understand who they're doing business with. Flock CEO was asked whether the company had any federal contracts. He said no. That was a lie. Public records revealed that Flock had been secretly running a pilot program giving the US Border Patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras. Now consider who's behind the company and where your data flows. Flock integrates directly with Palantir, a data fusion platform, with a $30 million contract with ICE. Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir, is also one of Flock's primary investors. These are not separate companies with separate agendas. They are connected actors that are building a connected infrastructure. Palantir's own CEO stated publicly just this month that his technology is being used as a political instrument, designed to reduce the political power of certain voters. And that's the ecosystem that our Corona cameras are feeding into. We're not anti-police at all. We're against mass surveillance of innocent residents by a company with a documented record of deception, built by investors with a stated political agenda. We're asking the City Council to start auditing the queries made against Flock's database, to disclose any data sharing agreements, and to take a vote to cancel the Flock safety contract” I looked more into this and he is 100% right Patents describe broader object detection, including tracking people and pedestrians, patents like US11416545B1. The system uses a centralized cloud database for nationwide queries Data goes to Flock’s private cloud, AWS-based, encrypted. Nationwide lookup is common, 75%+ of customers are enrolled enabling cross-jurisdictional searches. Residents have no direct public records access to the corporate servers. This creates a mass surveillance network feeding a private company’s infrastructure If you ask me this is laying the infrastructure for a mass surveillance network in America. We are being lied to. Cancel all contracts nationwide

This is horrifying and every American needs to hear this California resident exposes what’s really going on with Flock Cameras in America “I want to be clear what these cameras actually are, and I say that with somebody with 20 years of experience in IT. I've served as the chief network architect for Fortune 500 companies, I've designed data centers, and today I work on cloud infrastructure for one of the largest loan origination companies in the country. I'm not speculating on how this technology works. I've read their patents and I know how it works. Flock advertises these cameras as simple license plate readers. But their own patents tell a different story. They're AI-powered surveillance machines that capture every passing vehicle and person and transmit that data to a private corporate cloud, making it queryable by a multitude of state and federal agencies. The city of Corona does not control that database, and Corona residents have no public record rights against a private company's servers. Our daily movements are being harvested by a $7.5 billion corporation, that only answers to venture capital investors, not to us. Flock did not reach that valuation on their per-camera subscription fees. That math doesn't add up The city council should also understand who they're doing business with. Flock CEO was asked whether the company had any federal contracts. He said no. That was a lie. Public records revealed that Flock had been secretly running a pilot program giving the US Border Patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras. Now consider who's behind the company and where your data flows. Flock integrates directly with Palantir, a data fusion platform, with a $30 million contract with ICE. Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir, is also one of Flock's primary investors. These are not separate companies with separate agendas. They are connected actors that are building a connected infrastructure. Palantir's own CEO stated publicly just this month that his technology is being used as a political instrument, designed to reduce the political power of certain voters. And that's the ecosystem that our Corona cameras are feeding into. We're not anti-police at all. We're against mass surveillance of innocent residents by a company with a documented record of deception, built by investors with a stated political agenda. We're asking the City Council to start auditing the queries made against Flock's database, to disclose any data sharing agreements, and to take a vote to cancel the Flock safety contract” I looked more into this and he is 100% right Patents describe broader object detection, including tracking people and pedestrians, patents like US11416545B1. The system uses a centralized cloud database for nationwide queries Data goes to Flock’s private cloud, AWS-based, encrypted. Nationwide lookup is common, 75%+ of customers are enrolled enabling cross-jurisdictional searches. Residents have no direct public records access to the corporate servers. This creates a mass surveillance network feeding a private company’s infrastructure If you ask me this is laying the infrastructure for a mass surveillance network in America. We are being lied to. Cancel all contracts nationwide

Wall Street Apes

971,450 views • 4 months ago

🚨 Flock safety cameras are expanding to surveillance drones “Flock just got wings — The same company behind the cameras are now putting autonomous surveillance drones in the sky” “Now the company's automated license plate readers have spread across the country, creating one of the nation's largest interconnected video surveillance networks. After partnering with aviation software company Aerodrome, Flock launched Flock Alpha, an autonomous police drone built to respond to emergencies before officers even arrive. The drone sits inside a waterproof docking station waiting for a call, and when a 911 report comes in, the drone can launch automatically and fly up to 60 miles per hour. Officers don't even have to be standing nearby — And this thing isn't just flying overhead. It's got thermal imaging, high-definition cameras, and powerful optical zoom. And while according to Flock, It can even read a vehicle's license plate from 2,000 feet away. That's not terrifying at all….” These drones are being marketed specifically as a “Drone as First Responder” used to respond to emergency calls But that’s not really all they’re being used for. I’ve shared a video of leaked San Francisco footage of flock drones that are very clearly just roaming around looking for crimes, in other words mass surveillance This is the surveillance state

🚨 Flock safety cameras are expanding to surveillance drones “Flock just got wings — The same company behind the cameras are now putting autonomous surveillance drones in the sky” “Now the company's automated license plate readers have spread across the country, creating one of the nation's largest interconnected video surveillance networks. After partnering with aviation software company Aerodrome, Flock launched Flock Alpha, an autonomous police drone built to respond to emergencies before officers even arrive. The drone sits inside a waterproof docking station waiting for a call, and when a 911 report comes in, the drone can launch automatically and fly up to 60 miles per hour. Officers don't even have to be standing nearby — And this thing isn't just flying overhead. It's got thermal imaging, high-definition cameras, and powerful optical zoom. And while according to Flock, It can even read a vehicle's license plate from 2,000 feet away. That's not terrifying at all….” These drones are being marketed specifically as a “Drone as First Responder” used to respond to emergency calls But that’s not really all they’re being used for. I’ve shared a video of leaked San Francisco footage of flock drones that are very clearly just roaming around looking for crimes, in other words mass surveillance This is the surveillance state

Wall Street Apes

91,291 views • 2 months ago

Flock Safety: Is America Building a “Pre-Crime” Surveillance State? | Free the Money Ep. 39 Are we moving toward a “pre-crime” surveillance state where authorities can track your movements, build a profile of your behavior, and potentially decide you’re suspicious before you’ve even committed a crime? Jason Bassler, co-founder of the Free Thought Project, joins me to expose Flock and the rapidly expanding surveillance infrastructure being built across America. We break down how Flock’s automated license plate readers (ALPRs) can track far more than just a license plate, creating a “digital fingerprint” of your vehicle and logging your daily movements. Jason also discusses documented cases of police abusing ALPRs, innocent people being wrongfully stopped or held at gunpoint, and Flock data being accessed beyond local police. He says ICE, the ATF, FBI, and DHS have accessed Flock data that cities never approved. Key points we cover: -Flock Safety’s nationwide network of ALPR cameras and its expanding drone technology -Why ALPRs account for less than 1% of crime clearance in many departments—meaning roughly 99% of the surveillance collected is on innocent people -Motorola Signal Trace technology that can detect wireless signals from phones, Bluetooth devices, AirPods, and wearables -The growing push for age verification and digital ID across the internet -Why taxpayers could be spending roughly $360 million per year on Flock cameras -The Fourth Amendment questions surrounding mass location tracking -Why financial privacy and private digital money matter in an increasingly surveilled world -How communities are fighting back through FOIA requests, city councils, and projects like DeFlock Remember to subscribe and hit the bell “🔔” icon to get notifications. Want financial privacy? Check out my favorite privacy coin Zano You can buy Zano seamlessly on MEXC using a VPN, or browse the full list of exchanges where Zano is available here: You can also find educational content, tutorials, and interviews on the official Zano YouTube Channel: 0:00 Jason Bassler’s Background: The Free Thought Project & Deplatforming 5:29 Flock Safety: Surveillance Infrastructure Disguised as Public Safety 7:04 How Flock ALPR Cameras Track Your Vehicle’s “Digital Fingerprint” 8:28 Flock’s New Alpha Drone: The Next Level of Mass Surveillance 10:22 Is Flock Unconstitutional? The Fourth Amendment Legal Gray Area 13:23 Private Businesses Are Using Flock Cameras Too 15:51 Flock vs. Your Phone: The Critical Difference 16:55 Zano 21:09 Police Abusing Flock: Stalking Exes & Innocent People Held at Gunpoint 22:40 Who Has Access to this Flock Data? Police, Federal Agencies & More 25:33 The Massive Data Breach & Foreign Adversary Risk 28:34 Flock’s Shocking Crime Stats: 99% of Surveillance Is on Innocent People 34:00 Beyond License Plates: Motorola Signal Trace Tracks Your Electronics 37:21 Age Verification & Digital ID: The Push to Identify Everyone Online 40:21 DeFlock: Mapping America’s Flock Surveillance Network 45:07 Taxpayers Are Spending $360 Million a Year to Be Surveilled 46:19 Why Private Money Is Essential for a Free Society 52:05 How to Fight Back: FOIA Requests, City Councils & Taking Action

Bri Teresi

110,458 views • 1 month ago

THE SURVEILLANCE STATE IS HERE, AND IT’S BEING SOLD AS “SAFETY” The surveillance state is no longer a distant dystopia. It is here, marketed as public safety. The argument is always the same: “If you have nothing to hide, why worry?” But privacy is not reserved for people hiding something. It is a fundamental right in a free society, protected precisely because unchecked government surveillance is dangerous. Will Freeman, founder of DeFlock, is challenging Flock Safety’s expanding camera network. The fight surrounding Freeman, Flock CEO Garrett Langley, and the lawsuit known as Langley v. Freeman exposes the deeper issue: once surveillance infrastructure is built, who decides how it will be used, and where does it stop? Flock cameras are only one piece. Palantir’s technology can fuse satellite imagery, radar, cameras, sensors, and other data into a real-time operational picture. On a battlefield, that means tracking targets and building strike packages. But what happens when that same logic- identify, track, fuse, predict, act is turned on the public? Flock cameras. Facial recognition. License plate readers. Satellites. Data fusion. When those systems connect, they do not simply monitor cars. They create a map of human movement, and the architecture of a surveillance prison. Maria Zeee (ZeeeMediaOfficial) joins me to break down the dystopian world these technologies are attempting to build.

THE SURVEILLANCE STATE IS HERE, AND IT’S BEING SOLD AS “SAFETY” The surveillance state is no longer a distant dystopia. It is here, marketed as public safety. The argument is always the same: “If you have nothing to hide, why worry?” But privacy is not reserved for people hiding something. It is a fundamental right in a free society, protected precisely because unchecked government surveillance is dangerous. Will Freeman, founder of DeFlock, is challenging Flock Safety’s expanding camera network. The fight surrounding Freeman, Flock CEO Garrett Langley, and the lawsuit known as Langley v. Freeman exposes the deeper issue: once surveillance infrastructure is built, who decides how it will be used, and where does it stop? Flock cameras are only one piece. Palantir’s technology can fuse satellite imagery, radar, cameras, sensors, and other data into a real-time operational picture. On a battlefield, that means tracking targets and building strike packages. But what happens when that same logic- identify, track, fuse, predict, act is turned on the public? Flock cameras. Facial recognition. License plate readers. Satellites. Data fusion. When those systems connect, they do not simply monitor cars. They create a map of human movement, and the architecture of a surveillance prison. Maria Zeee (ZeeeMediaOfficial) joins me to break down the dystopian world these technologies are attempting to build.

Ben Swann

22,085 views • 1 month ago

WOW 🚨 There is now a ‘Flock Safe City designations” This happens when a city uses the integrated system of Flock license plate readers, drones, gunshot detectors and live cameras monitoring the city that track people that blanket the city and monitor at all times “Harvey, Illinois new real-time crime center, powered by a suite of technology never before seen in Illinois. Police tell us this is necessary to respond to and prevent crime, but privacy concerns over powerful police monitoring tools continue to mount nationwide. This is the heart of Harvey's real-time crime center, equipped with live video cameras that pan, tilt and zoom, automated license plate readers, gunshot detection technology, and this semi-autonomous drone blanketing the city of 20,000 people with a network of integrated surveillance systems powered by Flock” “They are proud to be the first city in the state with the designation of a Flock Safe City, equipped with nearly every surveillance product Flock provides, paid for with grant money” This is the mass surveillance state being put up right before our eyes in America The Flock CEO is even on camera saying they want to get contracts with major retailers and start mass surveillance of people. Even being able to put people in databases so if they come into locations, that location will be alerted People need to realize how serious this is

WOW 🚨 There is now a ‘Flock Safe City designations” This happens when a city uses the integrated system of Flock license plate readers, drones, gunshot detectors and live cameras monitoring the city that track people that blanket the city and monitor at all times “Harvey, Illinois new real-time crime center, powered by a suite of technology never before seen in Illinois. Police tell us this is necessary to respond to and prevent crime, but privacy concerns over powerful police monitoring tools continue to mount nationwide. This is the heart of Harvey's real-time crime center, equipped with live video cameras that pan, tilt and zoom, automated license plate readers, gunshot detection technology, and this semi-autonomous drone blanketing the city of 20,000 people with a network of integrated surveillance systems powered by Flock” “They are proud to be the first city in the state with the designation of a Flock Safe City, equipped with nearly every surveillance product Flock provides, paid for with grant money” This is the mass surveillance state being put up right before our eyes in America The Flock CEO is even on camera saying they want to get contracts with major retailers and start mass surveillance of people. Even being able to put people in databases so if they come into locations, that location will be alerted People need to realize how serious this is

Wall Street Apes

47,173 views • 1 month ago

FLOCK CAMERAS ARE TESTING THE LIMITS OF PRIVACY Do Americans have a constitutional expectation of privacy in public? Courts have generally allowed police to observe license plates and vehicles on public roads. But Flock’s growing camera networks raise a larger question: when does collecting, storing, and searching those records become mass tracking? A single camera snapshot may be treated differently from a system that builds a searchable record of where someone drives, works, shops, worships, or seeks medical care. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches, and the constitutional line may depend on how much of a person’s daily life these networks can reconstruct. Connor Boyack (Connor Boyack 📚) joins me to break down Flock cameras, privacy rights, and the legal limits on an expanding surveillance system.

FLOCK CAMERAS ARE TESTING THE LIMITS OF PRIVACY Do Americans have a constitutional expectation of privacy in public? Courts have generally allowed police to observe license plates and vehicles on public roads. But Flock’s growing camera networks raise a larger question: when does collecting, storing, and searching those records become mass tracking? A single camera snapshot may be treated differently from a system that builds a searchable record of where someone drives, works, shops, worships, or seeks medical care. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches, and the constitutional line may depend on how much of a person’s daily life these networks can reconstruct. Connor Boyack (Connor Boyack 📚) joins me to break down Flock cameras, privacy rights, and the legal limits on an expanding surveillance system.

Redacted

17,918 views • 2 months ago

Last night the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approved a contract with Flock Safety for drones to respond to police service calls. There was immense public backlash over this decision, but before the board could hear the public’s grievances, they removed the first public comment period. This only left one public comment at the end AFTER votes had taken place. Commissioner Powell made the motion to remove the public comment and Chair Woodward refused to do a roll call vote to confirm there was a sufficient number of votes for this change. Originally the Flock contract was for a free trial period until December and the county would be charged 2.5 million for two years if they did not opt out. This item received less than three minutes of consideration in committee and the sheriff’s office assured commissioners that the public’s data would be protected. However, that was no where in Flock’s contract. Commissioner Bob Hoffman offered an amendment to the item to only allow for the trial period without an automatic renewal, ensuring the data is owned by Oakland County Sheriff and not Flock, and the drones can only be used for calls for service or officer generated. The amendment was approved and the pilot contract was approved. This resulted in outbursts throughout the meeting and eventually a 3.5 hour public comment period at the end. Residents often spoke of the invasion of privacy, concerns about hacking the Flock system, and fear of constant surveillance. The meeting started 45 minutes late and lasted to almost midnight.

Last night the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approved a contract with Flock Safety for drones to respond to police service calls. There was immense public backlash over this decision, but before the board could hear the public’s grievances, they removed the first public comment period. This only left one public comment at the end AFTER votes had taken place. Commissioner Powell made the motion to remove the public comment and Chair Woodward refused to do a roll call vote to confirm there was a sufficient number of votes for this change. Originally the Flock contract was for a free trial period until December and the county would be charged 2.5 million for two years if they did not opt out. This item received less than three minutes of consideration in committee and the sheriff’s office assured commissioners that the public’s data would be protected. However, that was no where in Flock’s contract. Commissioner Bob Hoffman offered an amendment to the item to only allow for the trial period without an automatic renewal, ensuring the data is owned by Oakland County Sheriff and not Flock, and the drones can only be used for calls for service or officer generated. The amendment was approved and the pilot contract was approved. This resulted in outbursts throughout the meeting and eventually a 3.5 hour public comment period at the end. Residents often spoke of the invasion of privacy, concerns about hacking the Flock system, and fear of constant surveillance. The meeting started 45 minutes late and lasted to almost midnight.

Anna Matson

15,199 views • 6 months ago

Flock cameras aren’t just watching the street, they’re watching you. Stores like Home Depot are contracting with Flock to install cameras in their parking lots. HOAs are bringing them in. Nursing homes. Gated communities. Private property that you pass through every day without thinking twice. That means your license plate can be photographed multiple times a day, logged, stored, and cross-referenced — not because you committed a crime, but because you existed in public. And suddenly all those new data centers popping up everywhere start to make a lot more sense. Think about it. Cities are signing contracts. Private corporations are signing contracts. Entire neighborhoods are signing contracts. That’s an explosion of data being collected, processed, and stored — constantly. People will say, “Relax, it’s just license plates.” For now. How long until it’s biometrics? How long until it’s facial recognition? How long until it’s movement tracking, behavioral profiling, predictive policing? Every system starts small. Every surveillance program begins with “safety” and “convenience.” And every time, the public is told not to worry — right up until the infrastructure is already in place. This isn’t about catching criminals. It’s about normalizing surveillance. This is a clip from my True Health Report podcast with Hakeem Anwar. Click below to watch right now.

Flock cameras aren’t just watching the street, they’re watching you. Stores like Home Depot are contracting with Flock to install cameras in their parking lots. HOAs are bringing them in. Nursing homes. Gated communities. Private property that you pass through every day without thinking twice. That means your license plate can be photographed multiple times a day, logged, stored, and cross-referenced — not because you committed a crime, but because you existed in public. And suddenly all those new data centers popping up everywhere start to make a lot more sense. Think about it. Cities are signing contracts. Private corporations are signing contracts. Entire neighborhoods are signing contracts. That’s an explosion of data being collected, processed, and stored — constantly. People will say, “Relax, it’s just license plates.” For now. How long until it’s biometrics? How long until it’s facial recognition? How long until it’s movement tracking, behavioral profiling, predictive policing? Every system starts small. Every surveillance program begins with “safety” and “convenience.” And every time, the public is told not to worry — right up until the infrastructure is already in place. This isn’t about catching criminals. It’s about normalizing surveillance. This is a clip from my True Health Report podcast with Hakeem Anwar. Click below to watch right now.

Andrew Kaufman MD

35,340 views • 8 months ago

Tucker Carlson says Flock Cameras will being “The slave state” This is the building of the surveillance state He calls out the founded of Flock, “Here is the founder of Flock Safety describing how he feels about anyone who disagrees with his project:” Founder “Terroristic organizations like Deflock, primary motivation is chaos. They are closer to Antifa than they are anything else.” Tucker Carlson says he’s on side of Deflock, he believes “They're an invasion of your privacy. They're dehumanizing” They’re funded by taxpayer money, so he’s a smug billionaire calling us all terrorists for being worried about surveillance while at the same time only being rich because our tax money The good news is, cities are responding to public outrage over this unlawful surveillance Dozens of cities and towns across the United States have pulled out of or even declined to renew contracts with Flock Safety’s automated license plate reader cameras due to public pushback, privacy concerns and data-sharing issues. I’ll go over a few at the end of the video You have to keep being loud and not accept unlawful surveillance 82+ communities across 28 states have terminated contracts or deactivated cameras since early 2025

Tucker Carlson says Flock Cameras will being “The slave state” This is the building of the surveillance state He calls out the founded of Flock, “Here is the founder of Flock Safety describing how he feels about anyone who disagrees with his project:” Founder “Terroristic organizations like Deflock, primary motivation is chaos. They are closer to Antifa than they are anything else.” Tucker Carlson says he’s on side of Deflock, he believes “They're an invasion of your privacy. They're dehumanizing” They’re funded by taxpayer money, so he’s a smug billionaire calling us all terrorists for being worried about surveillance while at the same time only being rich because our tax money The good news is, cities are responding to public outrage over this unlawful surveillance Dozens of cities and towns across the United States have pulled out of or even declined to renew contracts with Flock Safety’s automated license plate reader cameras due to public pushback, privacy concerns and data-sharing issues. I’ll go over a few at the end of the video You have to keep being loud and not accept unlawful surveillance 82+ communities across 28 states have terminated contracts or deactivated cameras since early 2025

Wall Street Apes

68,487 views • 2 months ago

🚨#BREAKING: An employee for Flock told a reporter that if he wants privacy, he can "opt out of society." So that reporter filmed a Flock worker installing a Flock cam on a public road next to his house... ...so Flock called 3 POLICE OFFICERS to pull over THE REPORTER for following them Yep, you read that right... the surveillance camera company called the cops because someone was surveilling them install surveillance. The reporter's name is Brendan Keefe. He's a national investigative reporter who has been digging into Flock and police abuse of its surveillance network since January. Flock happened to be upgrading a camera about a mile from Keefe's own house, so he parked at a distance, put out his press placard, put on a yellow vest, and pulled out a news camera. The Flock installer saw him, packed up his ladder, jumped in his vehicle, and took off. Keefe followed several cars back to document the next installation. The Flock employee picked up the phone and called 911. "I work with Flock Safety, and I'm getting followed, harassed pretty much, taking videos and pictures." Next thing Brenden sees are THREE Georgia police cars with their lights on behind him. "The reason why I'm stopping you is because there is a vehicle that says that you have been following them." He was released with no charges. Because he did nothing wrong. Filming in public is legal in all 50 states.

🚨#BREAKING: An employee for Flock told a reporter that if he wants privacy, he can "opt out of society." So that reporter filmed a Flock worker installing a Flock cam on a public road next to his house... ...so Flock called 3 POLICE OFFICERS to pull over THE REPORTER for following them Yep, you read that right... the surveillance camera company called the cops because someone was surveilling them install surveillance. The reporter's name is Brendan Keefe. He's a national investigative reporter who has been digging into Flock and police abuse of its surveillance network since January. Flock happened to be upgrading a camera about a mile from Keefe's own house, so he parked at a distance, put out his press placard, put on a yellow vest, and pulled out a news camera. The Flock installer saw him, packed up his ladder, jumped in his vehicle, and took off. Keefe followed several cars back to document the next installation. The Flock employee picked up the phone and called 911. "I work with Flock Safety, and I'm getting followed, harassed pretty much, taking videos and pictures." Next thing Brenden sees are THREE Georgia police cars with their lights on behind him. "The reason why I'm stopping you is because there is a vehicle that says that you have been following them." He was released with no charges. Because he did nothing wrong. Filming in public is legal in all 50 states.

Matt Van Swol

2,760,190 views • 15 days ago

THE QUIET RISE OF AMERICA’S AI SURVEILLANCE NETWORK Flock Safety “license plate readers” are quietly building an AI-powered surveillance grid that logs where millions of ordinary Americans drive, work, worship, and live every day. Police across the country have already been caught abusing these systems to stalk and harass people, and even the LAPD has now let its Flock contract expire over civil liberties and privacy concerns. In Cleveland, elected officials voted down a renewed Flock contract, yet the cameras stayed on, and police kept using them anyway, raising serious questions about who actually controls this and who owns the data it collects. Flock’s Nova platform is designed to fuse license plate data with other records into a Google-style “people search” for law enforcement, making it easier than ever to build detailed profiles of ordinary citizens. This isn’t a hypothetical future. It’s already here and expanding. The real question now isn’t whether these systems can help solve crimes; it’s whether we’re sleepwalking into a permanent AI surveillance state where every drive, visit, protest, clinic stop, or church service is logged, stored, and ready to be used against us the moment someone in power decides we’re a problem.

THE QUIET RISE OF AMERICA’S AI SURVEILLANCE NETWORK Flock Safety “license plate readers” are quietly building an AI-powered surveillance grid that logs where millions of ordinary Americans drive, work, worship, and live every day. Police across the country have already been caught abusing these systems to stalk and harass people, and even the LAPD has now let its Flock contract expire over civil liberties and privacy concerns. In Cleveland, elected officials voted down a renewed Flock contract, yet the cameras stayed on, and police kept using them anyway, raising serious questions about who actually controls this and who owns the data it collects. Flock’s Nova platform is designed to fuse license plate data with other records into a Google-style “people search” for law enforcement, making it easier than ever to build detailed profiles of ordinary citizens. This isn’t a hypothetical future. It’s already here and expanding. The real question now isn’t whether these systems can help solve crimes; it’s whether we’re sleepwalking into a permanent AI surveillance state where every drive, visit, protest, clinic stop, or church service is logged, stored, and ready to be used against us the moment someone in power decides we’re a problem.

Ben Swann

23,080 views • 2 months ago

NSA WHISTLEBLOWER WARNS: FLOCK CAMERAS ARE BUILDING A 24/7 SURVEILLANCE GRID NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake warns that Flock cameras are not simply crime-fighting tools. They are becoming the backbone of a surveillance network capable of tracking ordinary Americans in real time. By outsourcing the infrastructure to private companies, government agencies can claim they are merely purchasing a service while gaining broad access to data that can monitor entire populations with far less oversight. It goes beyond license plates. Bluetooth signals, wireless transmissions, phones, smartwatches, and in-vehicle systems can all become digital beacons. Combined, those signals can map where you drive, who you visit, the events you attend, and how you move through your community. That data can be stored, searched, and shared far beyond the local police department that collected it. Thomas Drake explains how license-plate readers, Bluetooth, wireless transmissions, and connected-vehicle systems are converging into a de facto tracking grid for every American. And when private corporations operate that grid instead of the government, the constitutional guardrails become even weaker, creating a quiet backdoor for unchecked data collection and abuse.

NSA WHISTLEBLOWER WARNS: FLOCK CAMERAS ARE BUILDING A 24/7 SURVEILLANCE GRID NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake warns that Flock cameras are not simply crime-fighting tools. They are becoming the backbone of a surveillance network capable of tracking ordinary Americans in real time. By outsourcing the infrastructure to private companies, government agencies can claim they are merely purchasing a service while gaining broad access to data that can monitor entire populations with far less oversight. It goes beyond license plates. Bluetooth signals, wireless transmissions, phones, smartwatches, and in-vehicle systems can all become digital beacons. Combined, those signals can map where you drive, who you visit, the events you attend, and how you move through your community. That data can be stored, searched, and shared far beyond the local police department that collected it. Thomas Drake explains how license-plate readers, Bluetooth, wireless transmissions, and connected-vehicle systems are converging into a de facto tracking grid for every American. And when private corporations operate that grid instead of the government, the constitutional guardrails become even weaker, creating a quiet backdoor for unchecked data collection and abuse.

Redacted

20,313 views • 1 month ago

🚨 EXPOSED: What the Flock is going on?! This is The Most Unhinged Surveillance Warning video You Will see All Year 🚨 A man fully painted as the Joker sits in his car and delivers a WILD rant about the exact laser YOU Must Never point at Flock Safety cameras. Flock runs a massive private network of license plate readers that photograph every vehicle, log the plate, time, location, and vehicle details. All that data feeds into searchable databases for police and subscribers nationwide. It tracks movements of millions of Americans every day with minimal oversight and has already sparked privacy lawsuits and city shutdowns in multiple places. The Joker guy dramatically warns against a powerful green laser in the 490 to 570 nanometer range above one thousand milliwatts. In technical reality such lasers can overwhelm and damage camera sensors by saturating them with intense light. Anything claiming megawatts is absurd theater because that power level belongs in industrial or military systems not pocket devices. Pointing lasers at surveillance gear can lead to felony charges for tampering or vandalism. Shockingly this appears to be the same person whose own robbery was solved using Flock camera footage... The irony is off the charts. Now answer these questions honestly... Do these cameras protect public safety or do they create warrantless mass tracking of every driver in America? Would you ever test a laser on one of these systems if it recorded your movements without permission? How powerful does a laser actually need to be to reliably blind these cameras and what are the permanent eye damage risks to the user? Have Flock cameras appeared near your home or commute and does knowing they watch you change how you drive? Is this Joker video hilarious performance art or a sign of growing public revolt against constant surveillance? What happens to society if thousands of people start countering these cameras with cheap tech anyone can buy online? Should private companies like Flock be allowed to build national vehicle tracking networks at all? Why do some cities keep installing them despite the privacy backlash and data breach risks? Is interfering with surveillance ever justified self defense or is it always criminal? The video exposes more than it intends. Watch it. Reply with your real take. The discussion starts here. Let me know what you think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too. And if you're not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are you doing?! Don't forget to check out the comments below for a FREE Book.

🚨 EXPOSED: What the Flock is going on?! This is The Most Unhinged Surveillance Warning video You Will see All Year 🚨 A man fully painted as the Joker sits in his car and delivers a WILD rant about the exact laser YOU Must Never point at Flock Safety cameras. Flock runs a massive private network of license plate readers that photograph every vehicle, log the plate, time, location, and vehicle details. All that data feeds into searchable databases for police and subscribers nationwide. It tracks movements of millions of Americans every day with minimal oversight and has already sparked privacy lawsuits and city shutdowns in multiple places. The Joker guy dramatically warns against a powerful green laser in the 490 to 570 nanometer range above one thousand milliwatts. In technical reality such lasers can overwhelm and damage camera sensors by saturating them with intense light. Anything claiming megawatts is absurd theater because that power level belongs in industrial or military systems not pocket devices. Pointing lasers at surveillance gear can lead to felony charges for tampering or vandalism. Shockingly this appears to be the same person whose own robbery was solved using Flock camera footage... The irony is off the charts. Now answer these questions honestly... Do these cameras protect public safety or do they create warrantless mass tracking of every driver in America? Would you ever test a laser on one of these systems if it recorded your movements without permission? How powerful does a laser actually need to be to reliably blind these cameras and what are the permanent eye damage risks to the user? Have Flock cameras appeared near your home or commute and does knowing they watch you change how you drive? Is this Joker video hilarious performance art or a sign of growing public revolt against constant surveillance? What happens to society if thousands of people start countering these cameras with cheap tech anyone can buy online? Should private companies like Flock be allowed to build national vehicle tracking networks at all? Why do some cities keep installing them despite the privacy backlash and data breach risks? Is interfering with surveillance ever justified self defense or is it always criminal? The video exposes more than it intends. Watch it. Reply with your real take. The discussion starts here. Let me know what you think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too. And if you're not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are you doing?! Don't forget to check out the comments below for a FREE Book.

Noah B. Price

30,342 views • 3 months ago

🚨 WOMAN FINDS A FLOCK CAMERA POINTED DIRECTLY AT HER BEDROOM WINDOW — “TO SAY I’M PISSED IS AN UNDERSTATEMENT” This is exactly why Americans are starting to ask how far this surveillance network is going. A woman walks outside her apartment and spots a Flock license plate reader. Then she realizes where it's facing. Her bedroom window. “There’s the camera lens.” “And guess what this is? This is my bedroom window.” She points out two more Flock cameras already positioned near the intersection and asks the obvious question: Why the hell was another one needed directly beside an apartment building? A system built to track vehicles is now so close to people's homes that a woman can look out the window where she sleeps and see the camera staring back at her. These systems are spreading into the same streets where Americans live, sleep and go about their lives. And once the infrastructure is everywhere, we're supposed to trust that whoever controls it will never point it somewhere it shouldn't be pointed. Today it's “just reading license plates.” Tomorrow? That's exactly what people are worried about. How close does a surveillance camera have to get to your bedroom window before you stop calling it public safety and start calling it an invasion of privacy?

🚨 WOMAN FINDS A FLOCK CAMERA POINTED DIRECTLY AT HER BEDROOM WINDOW — “TO SAY I’M PISSED IS AN UNDERSTATEMENT” This is exactly why Americans are starting to ask how far this surveillance network is going. A woman walks outside her apartment and spots a Flock license plate reader. Then she realizes where it's facing. Her bedroom window. “There’s the camera lens.” “And guess what this is? This is my bedroom window.” She points out two more Flock cameras already positioned near the intersection and asks the obvious question: Why the hell was another one needed directly beside an apartment building? A system built to track vehicles is now so close to people's homes that a woman can look out the window where she sleeps and see the camera staring back at her. These systems are spreading into the same streets where Americans live, sleep and go about their lives. And once the infrastructure is everywhere, we're supposed to trust that whoever controls it will never point it somewhere it shouldn't be pointed. Today it's “just reading license plates.” Tomorrow? That's exactly what people are worried about. How close does a surveillance camera have to get to your bedroom window before you stop calling it public safety and start calling it an invasion of privacy?

HustleBitch

15,368 views • 1 month ago

REPORT: The U.S. just proposed collecting DNA from foreign tourists—turning routine border checks into a permanent genetic surveillance dragnet. Even visitors from trusted allies could soon be forced to surrender their DNA—just to enter the country. A DHS notice uncovered by Reclaim the Net reveals a sweeping expansion of biometric tracking. Alongside DNA, officials want facial scans, iris scans, fingerprints, and five years of social media history. And they’re not stopping there. CBP also wants full family profiles: names, birthplaces, contact info, and addresses for spouses, parents, siblings, and children. One traveler could effectively expose their entire family to genetic surveillance—without their consent. Nearly 14.5 million travelers apply each year. Critics warn this would create one of the most invasive data networks in history—with no answers on how the DNA would be stored, used, or protected. Would you hand over your DNA just to take a vacation? Watch the full report:👇

REPORT: The U.S. just proposed collecting DNA from foreign tourists—turning routine border checks into a permanent genetic surveillance dragnet. Even visitors from trusted allies could soon be forced to surrender their DNA—just to enter the country. A DHS notice uncovered by Reclaim the Net reveals a sweeping expansion of biometric tracking. Alongside DNA, officials want facial scans, iris scans, fingerprints, and five years of social media history. And they’re not stopping there. CBP also wants full family profiles: names, birthplaces, contact info, and addresses for spouses, parents, siblings, and children. One traveler could effectively expose their entire family to genetic surveillance—without their consent. Nearly 14.5 million travelers apply each year. Critics warn this would create one of the most invasive data networks in history—with no answers on how the DNA would be stored, used, or protected. Would you hand over your DNA just to take a vacation? Watch the full report:👇

Vigilant Fox 🦊

52,334 views • 9 months ago

WOAH 🚨 Texas State Police purchased new vehicles that have surveillance systems that will READ YOUR PHONE as you’re driving down the highway Phones will soon be monitored. “Texas State Police recently bought vehicles equipped with technology that can intercept mobile phone data” The Texas Department of Public Safety approved an emergency $4,487,500 purchase of four 2026 Chevrolet Tahoe Police Pursuit Vehicles loaded with Cognyte FalcoNet gear. Only $600,000 of that was for the trucks themselves. The rest bought the surveillance systems Purchase order included: - Four FalcoNet core systems: $2.85 million - 5G perpetual licenses: $280,000 - Backpack-portable units so it can leave the vehicle - Antenna kits, amplifiers and mounting hardware Once connected, the system pulls identifying phone information like your IMSI, IMEI and location data. 3 system can be operational in about 3 minutes and process THOUSANDS of devices per minute (Holy sh*t) The surveillance state is expanding in America and Texas seeks to be leading the way “I'm in Houston, the largest city in Texas, where authorities are quietly building a web of cameras, drones, sensors and AI systems” - The cameras at some businesses like gas stations are required by law in Texas and police can request the footage - Roads are getting a new AI traffic camera system - Houston scrapped its old gunshot detection system after opposition, but it's approved a new one which can detect gunshots, cars screeching and glass breaking - Drones are also being used. Police used them during the World Cup, but won't say how many they have now “And is my phone being monitored? Texas State Police recently bought vehicles equipped with technology that can intercept mobile phone data… and the most controversial tool right now, Flock license plate readers. Officials here won't say how many they have or where they are, but there's at least 3,800 in the county alone” The police vehicles equipped with this new surveillance system will look like ordinary state police Tahoes. Antennas are concealed behind a raised false roof

WOAH 🚨 Texas State Police purchased new vehicles that have surveillance systems that will READ YOUR PHONE as you’re driving down the highway Phones will soon be monitored. “Texas State Police recently bought vehicles equipped with technology that can intercept mobile phone data” The Texas Department of Public Safety approved an emergency $4,487,500 purchase of four 2026 Chevrolet Tahoe Police Pursuit Vehicles loaded with Cognyte FalcoNet gear. Only $600,000 of that was for the trucks themselves. The rest bought the surveillance systems Purchase order included: - Four FalcoNet core systems: $2.85 million - 5G perpetual licenses: $280,000 - Backpack-portable units so it can leave the vehicle - Antenna kits, amplifiers and mounting hardware Once connected, the system pulls identifying phone information like your IMSI, IMEI and location data. 3 system can be operational in about 3 minutes and process THOUSANDS of devices per minute (Holy sh*t) The surveillance state is expanding in America and Texas seeks to be leading the way “I'm in Houston, the largest city in Texas, where authorities are quietly building a web of cameras, drones, sensors and AI systems” - The cameras at some businesses like gas stations are required by law in Texas and police can request the footage - Roads are getting a new AI traffic camera system - Houston scrapped its old gunshot detection system after opposition, but it's approved a new one which can detect gunshots, cars screeching and glass breaking - Drones are also being used. Police used them during the World Cup, but won't say how many they have now “And is my phone being monitored? Texas State Police recently bought vehicles equipped with technology that can intercept mobile phone data… and the most controversial tool right now, Flock license plate readers. Officials here won't say how many they have or where they are, but there's at least 3,800 in the county alone” The police vehicles equipped with this new surveillance system will look like ordinary state police Tahoes. Antennas are concealed behind a raised false roof

Wall Street Apes

339,096 views • 1 month ago

Flock cameras have been out up in the Richland Wildlife Management Area in Florida The location of the flock cameras are in “miles and miles of Florida wilderness with no neighborhoods or shopping centers, subdivisions or traffic lights around — Why are there surveillance cameras here? Why are there license plate readers sitting at the crossroads of a wildlife management area? Who are they watching? The hunters? People exercising their Second Amendment rights? Families going camping? Fishermen headed to a boat ramp? Because it isn't just here” “But here's the question that no one seems willing to ask: How much surveillance are we willing to accept? For decades, law enforcement investigated crimes without building massive networks of cameras that record the movements of millions of law-abiding Americans” I have ferried these cameras are indeed there, and there is literally nothing around the area They were installed by the Hernando County Sheriff’s Office which has also deployed dozens of Flock cameras across the county. From what I can find, over 40 installed on county roads Law enforcement says there are here for - Recovering stolen vehicles - Tracking suspects - Solving crimes in these rural areas - General public safety They look like unnecessary surveillance. There is literally nothing around here I have included a video that shows just how far these cameras really are from society, it’s shocking

Flock cameras have been out up in the Richland Wildlife Management Area in Florida The location of the flock cameras are in “miles and miles of Florida wilderness with no neighborhoods or shopping centers, subdivisions or traffic lights around — Why are there surveillance cameras here? Why are there license plate readers sitting at the crossroads of a wildlife management area? Who are they watching? The hunters? People exercising their Second Amendment rights? Families going camping? Fishermen headed to a boat ramp? Because it isn't just here” “But here's the question that no one seems willing to ask: How much surveillance are we willing to accept? For decades, law enforcement investigated crimes without building massive networks of cameras that record the movements of millions of law-abiding Americans” I have ferried these cameras are indeed there, and there is literally nothing around the area They were installed by the Hernando County Sheriff’s Office which has also deployed dozens of Flock cameras across the county. From what I can find, over 40 installed on county roads Law enforcement says there are here for - Recovering stolen vehicles - Tracking suspects - Solving crimes in these rural areas - General public safety They look like unnecessary surveillance. There is literally nothing around here I have included a video that shows just how far these cameras really are from society, it’s shocking

Wall Street Apes

570,752 views • 3 months ago