Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Jimmy Carr, the British comedian, made a sharp observation about a major political shift happening in the West. He traces it back to Hillary Clinton calling millions of Americans “deplorable.” From there, he says, traditional left-leaning parties started to change. In the UK, he argues the Labour Party —...

440,373 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Buy this man a pint. Jamie Raskin is a hero of mine, now he’s a bigger hero of mine. As a Brit, I can tell you that Nigel Farage is a traitor who is attempting to bring down the British government using EXACTLY the same playbook that Trump did in the US. He continues to deliberately stir civil unrest and he had no good reason to be in Washington yesterday other than to stir up more trouble. His constituents never see him, he has no interest in serving anyone but himself (sound familiar?) He was the root cause of BREXIT which according to The Centre for European Reform (CER) and Bloomberg is costing the UK at least £100 billion in annual economic damage. His political party Reform UK Party Ltd which is a new company has failed to declare who is in control of the companies behind the party raises concerns as to who is in control of the companies behind it. No other UK Party is a Ltd company. It is a new development in UK politics. A corporation running a political party. Were he to win a General Election a corporation would be running the UK government. Take a moment to think about that. Donald Trump would give his right swollen leg for that privilege. As reported in Byline Times ‘It has also emerged that Reform UK’s predecessor party, the Brexit Party — led by Richard Tice MP a current Reform MP, was subject to a “compulsory strike-off” by Companies House in 2022. Reform 2025 Ltd, is listed as a ‘Person of Significant Control’ (PSC) — legally required information which all companies must provide to the registrar, Companies House, as to who truly owns the firm. According to accounting expert Dan Neidle: “On the face of the company’s incorporation documents, Farage and Yusuf are the PSCs. It’s not clear to me why they’re not listed as such.” The company has a very opaque structure which suggests to me that it would be difficult to unravel where the money is coming from. Same as it ever was. As Shakespeare wrote “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark" In my personal opinion this man is a Trojan horse funded by dark money from the hard right in the US. His sole purpose is to disrupt and undermine confidence in democracy using the same model adopted by MAGA. I fully intend to get to the bottom of it. Here in the UK, we are not going to let the 30% of tribal bigots and racists stage a coup to install a MAGA regime. Rest assured of that.Nigel Farage is a Trump wannabe and he will not be allowed to destroy my country as he already attempted to do with BREXIT while betting against the UK Pound at the same time. He’s a crook. THANK YOU JAMIE RASKIN I SALUTE YOU SIR. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

20,196 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

The Singaporean has been arrested after he being defrauded? Why is the NDC Regional Chairman Ashie Moore still free? I know this turn of event follows For The Records exposé on this issue Let’s revisit what the law says from the Political Party Act 2000 (Act 574) PART III-FUNDING OF POLITICAL PARTIES Section 23: Contribution by Citizens. Only a citizen may contribute in cash or in kind to the funds of a political party. A firm, partnership, or enterprise owned by a citizen or a company registered under the laws of the Republic at least seventy-five percent of whose capital is owned by a citizen is for the purposes of this Act a citizen. Section 24: No Contribution by Non-Citizens. A non-citizen shall not directly or indirectly make a contribution or donation or loan whether in cash or in kind to the funds held by or for the benefit of a political party and no political party or person acting for or on behalf of a political party shall demand or accept a contribution donation or loan from a non-citizen. Section 25: Contraventions of this Part. Where any person contravenes section 23 or 24, in addition to any penalty that may be imposed under this Act, any amount whether in cash or in kind paid in contravention of the section shall be forfeited to the State and the amount shall be recovered from the political party as debt owed to the State. The political party or person in whose custody the amount is for the time being held shall pay it to the State. A non-citizen found guilty of contravention of section 24 shall be deemed to be a prohibited immigrant and liable to deportation under the Aliens Act, 1963 (Act 160). The provisions of sections 23 and 24 do not preclude a goverment of any country or a nongovernmental organization from providing assistance in cash or in kind to the Commission for use by the Commission for the collective benefit of registered political parties. The law is clear on this and we expect the NDC Chairman to refund the money sponsored by Toh You Kang into their campaign to the state. Total Abuse of Power! Scam Aban!

For The Records

58,828 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

WOW. NBC’s Chuck Todd succinctly in two and a half minutes describes The Alignment in real time to viewers with the new Trump coalition adding working class Hispanics with a focus on the economy and education, not “Latinx”: Todd: Iowa pollster Ann Selzer “thought she found something with...independent women...I don’t know if it’s enough to make up for the loss of voters of color that have — clearly — I mean, that is — that continues, to me, to be the big story of the night is the shift among Hispanics. Look, Hispanic voters are swing voters and I think, you know, what's interesting here it is the Republican Party treated them the same way they treated white, working class voters. They courted them the same they treated white, working class voters. The Democratic Party has spent a lot of time treating it as an identity group. And, you know, whether it's latinx, which sort of fell flat and so, there’s been a lot of hand-wringing inside Democratic circles. A real split like, you know, it was a total misread sort of by the coastal strategists when it comes to how to target working class voters of color. And I think we’re starting to see sort of a working class coalition start to drift to the right. You know, before, Donald Trump had working class whites. Now? He’s adding working class Hispanics and working class — not necessary seeing evidence of working class African Americans — but adding working class Hispanics. That becomes a very durable majority...It doesn’t matter your ethnicity. It matters your education...Latino voters, in many ways, same — are driven by the same issues and there’s one issue in particular actually that Republicans align closer with Latino — or Latino voters align with conservative — with conservative party and that's school choice. And that has been -- and you can't help but wonder both Florida and Texas has been aggressive about expanding school choice. Where have Republicans made the greatest gains amongst Hispanic voters? Florida and Texas. So, education and economy, those issues — bread and butter issues and that is how they talk to them. Not saying Democrats weren't, but for the sort of cultural issues don't play as well with Hispanic voters as they may with college-educated whites or even African Americans.”

Curtis Houck

2,802,023 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The former RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch warned people about #KeirStarmer before the election. Most of the media laughed it off. Many in Labour dismissed him. But he understood exactly what Starmer represented. Lynch said Starmer’s Labour was managerial, not political. A party run by lawyers, advisors, and communications professionals rather than people rooted in labour history, trade unions, industry, or working-class communities. A party that believed in management, not representation. Stability, not change. Administration, not politics. He warned that if Starmer won, Labour would not govern as a movement, but as a management team. If anything, Lynch understated it. What we have seen is not a political Prime Minister but an administrative one. Government by briefing note, by focus group, by legal framing rather than political vision. A Labour Party reshaped from a political movement into something closer to a corporate structure with MPs. Under Starmer, Labour has been changed more fundamentally than even under Blair. Blair at least had a political project. Starmer’s project has been control. Centralise the party. Remove internal opposition. Sideline unions. Purge members. Control candidate selection. Control messaging. Control policy. The result is a Labour Party that is now barely recognisable as a working-class party, and barely recognisable even as a democratic political party. It behaves more like an administrative arm of the state than a movement representing the people. Alongside this has come something else that should worry anyone who cares about civil liberties. Expanding surveillance powers. Restrictions on protest. Speech laws framed as safety. Increasing police powers. More powers for the state, fewer rights for the citizen. All passed in the language of responsibility and stability. This is managerial politics. Not leadership, not representation, not democracy in the traditional labour movement sense. Management of the population. Management of expectations. Management of decline. Mick Lynch saw a managerial Labour Party coming. What he didn’t see was a Labour Party rebuilt as a machine: centrally controlled, staffed with loyalists, a government with authoritarian instincts and no roots in the labour movement at all, parachuting in MPs with little to no experience outside political offices, hand-picked acolytes from outfits like Labour Together, selected not for independence or service to their communities, but for loyalty to the leadership. MPs whose first duty is not to their constituents, not to their country, but to the party machine and the people who control it. Labour didn’t win power for the people. Starmer won power for the global oligarchy and that little club he's been a member of since 2019... Paul Knaggs , Labour Heartlands

The Heartlands Tribune

105,427 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce