正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Joe Biden, then a much younger Senator representing Delaware, making a passionate appeal for sanctions against the Apartheid regime of South Africa 1986. That same year, thanks partly to his relentless effort, the Senate passed ‘The Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986’ which dealt a decisive blow to the White... show more

TOKO

49,432 subscribers

25,162 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Tamale Nkoyooyo 的头像

Tamale Nkoyooyo2 年前

See what one is capable of doing in their youthful years. It's such a moving submission!

aloysius maximus 的头像

aloysius maximus2 年前

@Lmc_89 Great submission at the time👌👌, but can he make a similar submission about the people of Palestine today?!🤔

Rahma Nakands 的头像

Rahma Nakands2 年前

He supported the creation of the Israel apartheid state.

Anthony Natif 的头像

Anthony Natif2 年前

GT, do you think your guy Trump will be better for Palestine? No, this is not a trick question.

Ronald B Twinomugisha 的头像

Ronald B Twinomugisha2 年前

Waiting for him to take a stand against Israel apartheid

Hans 的头像

Hans2 年前

In their youthful years that's what happens in old age the contrary is true. And this cuts accross leaders.📌🥲

Hannah T 的头像

Hannah T2 年前

It is easy to forget, but America really played a massive, massive role in decolonization. I get their angle, but nonetheless, their contribution to that change of guard was/is tremendous

Tania Anderson 的头像

Tania Anderson2 年前

What happened GenocideJoe?

Kayondo Patrick 的头像

Kayondo Patrick2 年前

The Biden we all hoped in for the better policies in the great country but now need to refocus on qns such as GaZa qn.

Shafii Rwabwogo 的头像

Shafii Rwabwogo2 年前

What lesson is learnt there, that biden has built his political career for decades making him an experienced leader of vast experience of over 50 years. Lesson, never rush things, anytime in life you can reach your goals as long as you live and stay focused towards achieving them

相关视频

During the apartheid era (1948–1994), the United States government maintained a complex and often contradictory relationship with the South African regime. Initially, U.S. foreign policy prioritized Cold War strategy over human rights, viewing apartheid South Africa as a reliable anti-communist ally in Africa. From the Truman to the Reagan administrations, American leaders emphasized "constructive engagement," favoring quiet diplomacy over economic sanctions. This approach allowed major U.S. corporations to continue operating in South Africa, providing vital economic support to the apartheid state. Despite growing domestic and international pressure, the U.S. resisted stringent sanctions until the 1980s. Grassroots movements, student activism, and congressional lobbying eventually led to the passage of the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, which was signed into law despite President Ronald Reagan's veto. This legislation marked a significant shift in U.S. policy and imposed sweeping economic sanctions on South Africa, including bans on new investment and imports of certain goods. While the U.S. government had long avoided direct confrontation with the apartheid regime, the 1986 sanctions played a pivotal role in isolating it economically and politically. The international community increasingly condemned apartheid as a crime against humanity, and the U.S. ultimately aligned itself with this global consensus. The pressure contributed to the dismantling of apartheid and the peaceful transition to democracy in 1994.

During the apartheid era (1948–1994), the United States government maintained a complex and often contradictory relationship with the South African regime. Initially, U.S. foreign policy prioritized Cold War strategy over human rights, viewing apartheid South Africa as a reliable anti-communist ally in Africa. From the Truman to the Reagan administrations, American leaders emphasized "constructive engagement," favoring quiet diplomacy over economic sanctions. This approach allowed major U.S. corporations to continue operating in South Africa, providing vital economic support to the apartheid state. Despite growing domestic and international pressure, the U.S. resisted stringent sanctions until the 1980s. Grassroots movements, student activism, and congressional lobbying eventually led to the passage of the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, which was signed into law despite President Ronald Reagan's veto. This legislation marked a significant shift in U.S. policy and imposed sweeping economic sanctions on South Africa, including bans on new investment and imports of certain goods. While the U.S. government had long avoided direct confrontation with the apartheid regime, the 1986 sanctions played a pivotal role in isolating it economically and politically. The international community increasingly condemned apartheid as a crime against humanity, and the U.S. ultimately aligned itself with this global consensus. The pressure contributed to the dismantling of apartheid and the peaceful transition to democracy in 1994.

LambChip

27,504 次观看 • 5 个月前

Why did Washington support South Africa's evil apartheid regime for decades? Filmmaker Matthew Cooke describes how the US turned a blind eye to the brutal white-minority government, which was considered a bulwark against the expansion of communism during the Cold War. There were also economic incentives, with US firms heavily invested in South Africa at the time. #apartheid #Mandela #liberation #HeritageDay #Zulu #SouthAfricans #history #heritage #SApolitics #SouthAfrica #NelsonMandela

Why did Washington support South Africa's evil apartheid regime for decades? Filmmaker Matthew Cooke describes how the US turned a blind eye to the brutal white-minority government, which was considered a bulwark against the expansion of communism during the Cold War. There were also economic incentives, with US firms heavily invested in South Africa at the time. #apartheid #Mandela #liberation #HeritageDay #Zulu #SouthAfricans #history #heritage #SApolitics #SouthAfrica #NelsonMandela

NEWS LION

10,647 次观看 • 6 天前

.Varsha Gandikota-Nellutla is spot on here. One factor that helped defeat South African apartheid was mobilising intl opinion against it. Support for South Africa was reduced to rabid right wingers as it became seen as a pariah state. The same will happen to the Israeli apartheid regime.

.Varsha Gandikota-Nellutla is spot on here. One factor that helped defeat South African apartheid was mobilising intl opinion against it. Support for South Africa was reduced to rabid right wingers as it became seen as a pariah state. The same will happen to the Israeli apartheid regime.

Saul Staniforth

20,892 次观看 • 6 个月前

Our ‘international airport’ had an in-depth interview with the British media in 1985. It was at the height of the apartheid state brutality and repression. He led a massive international campaign for comprehensive sanctions against the apartheid regime. The year 1985 marked a pivotal escalation in South Africa’s anti-apartheid struggle, characterised by widespread mass protests, labor strikes, and intensified township resistance. By June, the UN Security Council urged member states to impose sanctions against the apartheid regime, precipitating a deepening political crisis. In response, PW Botha proclaimed a state of emergency to avert systemic collapse. The European Community and Commonwealth nations duly responded with economic sanctions. Until this moment, the US had extended unconditional political and economic backing to apartheid South Africa. It was only in 1986 under international pressure that the US imposed stricter economic measures against the apartheid regime. Winnie Mandela had been banished to Brandfort in the Free State. She defied the banning order and returned to Soweto to spearhead grassroots resistance against the regime. From 1985 onward, apartheid began to unravel. The state despite its attempts repression, it increasingly could not sustain its legitimacy and political stability. The real turning point came when FW de Klerk replaced PW Botha in 1989 and moved to open negotiations. In 1990, the ANC and other liberation organisations were unbanned, and Mandela was released from prison. Subsequent negotiations culminated in a transitional settlement wherein the enfeebled apartheid criminals ceded political power to the ANC while retaining de facto dominance over the economy. This negotiated criminal structure still persists today. Economic power remains concentrated among historical beneficiaries of the apartheid regime. Our economic liberation was sold at the negotiations table. Winnie Madikizela-Mandela did say that she felt betrayed. Chris Hani too opposed the negotiations and was murdered.

Our ‘international airport’ had an in-depth interview with the British media in 1985. It was at the height of the apartheid state brutality and repression. He led a massive international campaign for comprehensive sanctions against the apartheid regime. The year 1985 marked a pivotal escalation in South Africa’s anti-apartheid struggle, characterised by widespread mass protests, labor strikes, and intensified township resistance. By June, the UN Security Council urged member states to impose sanctions against the apartheid regime, precipitating a deepening political crisis. In response, PW Botha proclaimed a state of emergency to avert systemic collapse. The European Community and Commonwealth nations duly responded with economic sanctions. Until this moment, the US had extended unconditional political and economic backing to apartheid South Africa. It was only in 1986 under international pressure that the US imposed stricter economic measures against the apartheid regime. Winnie Mandela had been banished to Brandfort in the Free State. She defied the banning order and returned to Soweto to spearhead grassroots resistance against the regime. From 1985 onward, apartheid began to unravel. The state despite its attempts repression, it increasingly could not sustain its legitimacy and political stability. The real turning point came when FW de Klerk replaced PW Botha in 1989 and moved to open negotiations. In 1990, the ANC and other liberation organisations were unbanned, and Mandela was released from prison. Subsequent negotiations culminated in a transitional settlement wherein the enfeebled apartheid criminals ceded political power to the ANC while retaining de facto dominance over the economy. This negotiated criminal structure still persists today. Economic power remains concentrated among historical beneficiaries of the apartheid regime. Our economic liberation was sold at the negotiations table. Winnie Madikizela-Mandela did say that she felt betrayed. Chris Hani too opposed the negotiations and was murdered.

Sentletse 🇿🇦🇷🇺🇵🇸🇱🇧

39,589 次观看 • 5 个月前

THE U.S. ALWAYS SUPPORTED APARTHEID US support for apartheid and settler-colonialism in South Africa goes as far back as its ‘constructive engagement’ policy that aimed to break South Africa's international isolation and use the apartheid regime as a proxy against socialist independence movements in Africa. Plus, African Stream’s Wambura Mwai (@wamburabrenda on IG) tells us that US corporations invested in upholding the apartheid regime with as much as $14.6 billion by the early 1980s, despite international boycotts, according to the US Out of Southern Africa Network. The US strategy bolstered the apartheid regime’s ability to suppress domestic and regional liberation movements. US President Donald Trump's support for white landowners in South Africa continues this longstanding US legacy of backing apartheid-era policies. Let us know in the comments what you think about this phenomenon.

THE U.S. ALWAYS SUPPORTED APARTHEID US support for apartheid and settler-colonialism in South Africa goes as far back as its ‘constructive engagement’ policy that aimed to break South Africa's international isolation and use the apartheid regime as a proxy against socialist independence movements in Africa. Plus, African Stream’s Wambura Mwai (@wamburabrenda on IG) tells us that US corporations invested in upholding the apartheid regime with as much as $14.6 billion by the early 1980s, despite international boycotts, according to the US Out of Southern Africa Network. The US strategy bolstered the apartheid regime’s ability to suppress domestic and regional liberation movements. US President Donald Trump's support for white landowners in South Africa continues this longstanding US legacy of backing apartheid-era policies. Let us know in the comments what you think about this phenomenon.

African Stream

22,712 次观看 • 1 年前

Its not antisemitic to oppose a genocidal apartheid regime. The 'Campaign Against Antisemitism' is a fake anti racist organisation that seeks to silence criticism of Israel.

Its not antisemitic to oppose a genocidal apartheid regime. The 'Campaign Against Antisemitism' is a fake anti racist organisation that seeks to silence criticism of Israel.

Saul Staniforth

31,222 次观看 • 5 个月前

This is a🧵on the parallels b/w the apartheid regimes in South Africa (1948-1994) and Israel (including Occupied Palestinian Territories) w/ a focus on the histories leading to the creation of the apartheid states, and the actions of both regimes to enact and maintain apartheid.

This is a🧵on the parallels b/w the apartheid regimes in South Africa (1948-1994) and Israel (including Occupied Palestinian Territories) w/ a focus on the histories leading to the creation of the apartheid states, and the actions of both regimes to enact and maintain apartheid.

Children of Darkness

168,132 次观看 • 2 年前

“You have Fidel Castro issuing battlefield commands over the phone.” — Blowback's noah kulwin breaks down for Ryan Grim & Saagar Enjeti how Fidel Castro and Cuban intervention in apartheid South Africa were among the decisive factors that led to the fall of the apartheid regime.

“You have Fidel Castro issuing battlefield commands over the phone.” — Blowback's noah kulwin breaks down for Ryan Grim & Saagar Enjeti how Fidel Castro and Cuban intervention in apartheid South Africa were among the decisive factors that led to the fall of the apartheid regime.

HalalFlow

125,683 次观看 • 8 个月前

"Gimme Hope Jo'anna" is an anti-apartheid song by Guyanese-British musician Eddy Grant, released in 1988. The song, which refers to Johannesburg ("Jo'anna") as a symbol of the apartheid system in South Africa, was banned by the South African government at the time but became a popular, optimistic plea for change with a danceable melody that offered hope for a better future.

"Gimme Hope Jo'anna" is an anti-apartheid song by Guyanese-British musician Eddy Grant, released in 1988. The song, which refers to Johannesburg ("Jo'anna") as a symbol of the apartheid system in South Africa, was banned by the South African government at the time but became a popular, optimistic plea for change with a danceable melody that offered hope for a better future.

History ZAR

58,608 次观看 • 1 年前

Jeremy Corbyn drops a massive historical bombshell. He confirms it was actually Cuban forces that dealt the fatal blow to the apartheid regime. He reveals Cuba's victory at Cuito Cuanavale completely broke the apartheid army, forcing them to negotiate. The West hides this truth!

Jeremy Corbyn drops a massive historical bombshell. He confirms it was actually Cuban forces that dealt the fatal blow to the apartheid regime. He reveals Cuba's victory at Cuito Cuanavale completely broke the apartheid army, forcing them to negotiate. The West hides this truth!

Furkan Gözükara

70,860 次观看 • 4 个月前

In 2024 the ICJ ruled that Israel is an apartheid state Any Labour MP that belongs to an organisation that lobbies on behalf of Israel is on the side of apartheid. Can you imagine 'Labour friends of South Africa' in the 1980s telling us what a great place apartheid SA was?

In 2024 the ICJ ruled that Israel is an apartheid state Any Labour MP that belongs to an organisation that lobbies on behalf of Israel is on the side of apartheid. Can you imagine 'Labour friends of South Africa' in the 1980s telling us what a great place apartheid SA was?

Saul Staniforth

47,524 次观看 • 8 个月前

The President of South Africa calling white South Africans 'colonisers' and implying we should be grateful we weren't chased out of South Africa. He then goes on to say that the refugees fleeing South Africa because of race-based persecution and the legal racial discrimination against them, are leaving because they want apartheid back. What a POS.

The President of South Africa calling white South Africans 'colonisers' and implying we should be grateful we weren't chased out of South Africa. He then goes on to say that the refugees fleeing South Africa because of race-based persecution and the legal racial discrimination against them, are leaving because they want apartheid back. What a POS.

Disprin

52,784 次观看 • 1 年前

I just saw that Mr George Galloway quoted my tweet, and it reminds me of when, as a political science undergrad at Nigeria’s premier university, I was researching the brutality of the apartheid regime in South Africa and came across his debate at the Oxford Union for the first time. In the debate, Mr Galloway spoke of a time he joined in the fight against apartheid in South Africa and asserted that he would never debate a supporter of apartheid because it is one of the worst forms of racism and fascism there are. It is a delight to see that he has remained steadfast in speaking out against apartheid, racism, and genocide, and that he has been consistent in upholding democracy, respect for international law, and the sovereignty of nations, especially those vulnerable to the whims of imperial predators. Attached is a video clip of his debate at the Oxford Union. Video credit: Oxford Union George Galloway

I just saw that Mr George Galloway quoted my tweet, and it reminds me of when, as a political science undergrad at Nigeria’s premier university, I was researching the brutality of the apartheid regime in South Africa and came across his debate at the Oxford Union for the first time. In the debate, Mr Galloway spoke of a time he joined in the fight against apartheid in South Africa and asserted that he would never debate a supporter of apartheid because it is one of the worst forms of racism and fascism there are. It is a delight to see that he has remained steadfast in speaking out against apartheid, racism, and genocide, and that he has been consistent in upholding democracy, respect for international law, and the sovereignty of nations, especially those vulnerable to the whims of imperial predators. Attached is a video clip of his debate at the Oxford Union. Video credit: Oxford Union George Galloway

Ayo-Elesho

139,717 次观看 • 6 个月前

WATCH: A racist white man attacked a Department of Education official, he called him with k-word while dragging him. The reality is that black South African natives are targeted by white racist minority that wants to bring back apartheid in South Africa.

WATCH: A racist white man attacked a Department of Education official, he called him with k-word while dragging him. The reality is that black South African natives are targeted by white racist minority that wants to bring back apartheid in South Africa.

PSAFLIVE

24,108 次观看 • 1 年前

Julius Malema is guilty of trying to destroy the apartheid economic systems that still preside over South Africa 🇿🇦, because apartheid may have politically ended, but the economic systems still remain. For that, I consider him a hero. ~ Jackson Hinkle

Julius Malema is guilty of trying to destroy the apartheid economic systems that still preside over South Africa 🇿🇦, because apartheid may have politically ended, but the economic systems still remain. For that, I consider him a hero. ~ Jackson Hinkle

Typical African

44,281 次观看 • 5 个月前

"South Africa knows what apartheid is... and Israeli apartheid is far more brutal than anything we experienced in South Africa." Ex South African Jewish MP Andrew Feinstein explains why Pretoria is bringing a claim of "genocidal intent" against Israel at the International Court of Justice later this week.

"South Africa knows what apartheid is... and Israeli apartheid is far more brutal than anything we experienced in South Africa." Ex South African Jewish MP Andrew Feinstein explains why Pretoria is bringing a claim of "genocidal intent" against Israel at the International Court of Justice later this week.

5Pillars

340,201 次观看 • 2 年前

🇵🇸 🇿🇦 President Cyril Ramaphosa: “The violence the Palestinian people are being subjected to is a grim continuation of a more than half a century of apartheid by Israel…we South Africans know what apartheid looks like, we suffered and died under apartheid. We will not remain silent and watch as apartheid is perpetrated against others.”

🇵🇸 🇿🇦 President Cyril Ramaphosa: “The violence the Palestinian people are being subjected to is a grim continuation of a more than half a century of apartheid by Israel…we South Africans know what apartheid looks like, we suffered and died under apartheid. We will not remain silent and watch as apartheid is perpetrated against others.”

State of Palestine

579,522 次观看 • 2 年前