Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Joel McHale is Mark… Evans. Originally envisioned for Patrick Dempsey as Sidney’s husband (Scream (2022) & VI scripts), the role shifted likely due to salary or creative issues. McHale’s take brings fresh chaos, as the Prescott-Evans haven’t faced Ghostface before. 🩸 #scream7

HelloSidney.com

41,153 subscribers

22,319 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Arts Comedy News & Politics #scream7

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

BetoYork1 year ago

The one who loses is Dempsey... Joel McHale, welcome to the Scream family. ❤🔪

Your Daily Post1 year ago

Why did Two and a Half Men star Angus T. Jones call the show “filth” before leaving it in 2012? Since then, he’s left Hollywood, choosing to focus on his faith and community work. Here's the full story 👇

Marc Downs1 year ago

He is Stu's cousin, who is playing the long game.

Hoodyz1 year ago

Well I feel stupid...It was today I found out Mason Gooding is Cuba Gooding Jr's son lol...wow

Tim Wagstaff1 year ago

Not impressed..... Should be Patrick Dempsey or nothing. .

David Arellano1 year ago

He doesn’t match Sidney’s aura or I don’t see any match with him

Liam Woodward1 year ago

They should of gone with Patrick. I am disappointed. #Scream7

Drew1 year ago

One more reason the film will flop. #BoycottScream7

Thiago Oliveira 🆗1 year ago

Quem se importa com o marido dela?! Queremos Sidney e Gale juntas

King Kaedrick 👑🐝1 year ago

I’m still so pissed! In a perfect world Kincaid is Sidney’s husband

Related Videos

Dr Dewi Evans spoke to Radio Wales Breakfast this morning. It is a fascinating interview—in particular, Evans' response to the question of whether he'd changed his mind on what caused Baby C's death. For context: Evans testified at trial that Lucy Letby murdered several babies by forcing air down their nasogastric tubes. But there is nothing in the scientific literature supporting this as a plausible method of murder—a fact Evans himself has had to concede post-trial. Evans has since recanted his theory, telling Channel 5 last summer that, "None of the babies were killed as a direct result of the injection of air, or fluid and air deliberately injected into their stomachs." More recently, Evans has denied that he ever recanted his original murder theory in the first place. The latest about-face came in response to Letby's new lawyer, Mark McDonald, announcing that he will seek to appeal Letby's convictions—based, in part, on Evans having changed his mind about this particular method of murder. And that brings us to Evans' interview this morning with Radio Wales Breakfast. When asked if he'd changed his mind about what caused Baby C's death, Evans equivocated. He told the interviewer that Letby may have "used both mechanisms"—meaning air forced down the nasogastric tube, and air injected directly into the baby's veins—and that, "either option was possible." It's a response reflective of the impossible position Evans has put himself in. He's no longer willing to stand by 'air forced down the nasogastric tube' as a feasible method of murder, but is similarly unwilling to admit that he's changed his mind.

Dr Dewi Evans spoke to Radio Wales Breakfast this morning. It is a fascinating interview—in particular, Evans' response to the question of whether he'd changed his mind on what caused Baby C's death. For context: Evans testified at trial that Lucy Letby murdered several babies by forcing air down their nasogastric tubes. But there is nothing in the scientific literature supporting this as a plausible method of murder—a fact Evans himself has had to concede post-trial. Evans has since recanted his theory, telling Channel 5 last summer that, "None of the babies were killed as a direct result of the injection of air, or fluid and air deliberately injected into their stomachs." More recently, Evans has denied that he ever recanted his original murder theory in the first place. The latest about-face came in response to Letby's new lawyer, Mark McDonald, announcing that he will seek to appeal Letby's convictions—based, in part, on Evans having changed his mind about this particular method of murder. And that brings us to Evans' interview this morning with Radio Wales Breakfast. When asked if he'd changed his mind about what caused Baby C's death, Evans equivocated. He told the interviewer that Letby may have "used both mechanisms"—meaning air forced down the nasogastric tube, and air injected directly into the baby's veins—and that, "either option was possible." It's a response reflective of the impossible position Evans has put himself in. He's no longer willing to stand by 'air forced down the nasogastric tube' as a feasible method of murder, but is similarly unwilling to admit that he's changed his mind.

The Trials of Lucy Letby

13,094 views • 1 year ago

Joel Pollak explains how the midterms forced Trump's hand on Iran Joel Pollak "The fact that Trump believes he is likely to lose the House means that he's getting as much done in the year that he can before Democrats take the House so that he can achieve all of these things and then ride it out for the last two years and do whatever he can. I think there's a sense of urgency, because he doesn't want to be known as the President who passed along these major problems to his successor, the way Obama passed on North Korea." What do you think? Is this about legacy and urgency, or something more?

Joel Pollak explains how the midterms forced Trump's hand on Iran Joel Pollak "The fact that Trump believes he is likely to lose the House means that he's getting as much done in the year that he can before Democrats take the House so that he can achieve all of these things and then ride it out for the last two years and do whatever he can. I think there's a sense of urgency, because he doesn't want to be known as the President who passed along these major problems to his successor, the way Obama passed on North Korea." What do you think? Is this about legacy and urgency, or something more?

jay plemons

18,457 views • 4 months ago

Scream 4 (2011) Scream 4 stands as a pivotal entry in the iconic slasher franchise. Though it initially struggled at the box office, the film has since garnered a significant cult following, largely due to its surprisingly prescient themes. The movie marked the return of original director Wes Craven and writer Kevin Williamson, who envisioned Scream 4 as the launchpad for a new trilogy. Before production began, Kevin Williamson "sketched out" concepts for Scream 5 and 6. In Williamson’s original concept, Jill Roberts was supposed to survive the events of Scream 4 and "get away with it all". The planned sequel, Scream 5, would have followed Jill as a "hero" at college, only to be stalked by a new Ghostface who knew the truth about her crimes. These plans were abandoned due to the film's lower-than-expected domestic box office performance and the passing of Wes Craven in 2015. The production of Scream 4 was notoriously difficult. Extensive script rewrites by Ehren Kruger (who penned Scream 3) occurred throughout filming. Early 2011 test screenings further necessitated four days of reshoots for two key sequences involving Aimee Teegarden and Alison Brie. Craven utilized computer-generated effects for the first time, adding knife blades in post-production to facilitate safer and more aggressive stabbing scenes. Unlike the California setting of the original, Scream 4 was filmed entirely in and around Ann Arbor, Michigan, chosen by the production team for its close resemblance to the fictional "Woodsboro." Despite its ambition, Scream 4's theatrical performance was underwhelming. It remains the only film in the series not to surpass the $100 million mark. Analysts attributed this lukewarm reception to an 11-year gap since Scream 3, an aging fan base, and stiff competition from Insidious, which dominated the horror market at the time. Despite its disappointing theatrical run, Scream 4 found greater success on home media. It debuted at #2 on the U.S. rental charts and remained in the top 20 for seven consecutive weeks, generating approximately $10.3 million in domestic DVD and Blu-ray sales. The Blu-ray release further catered to fans with 17 deleted/extended scenes, a gag reel, and an alternate opening/ending, offering a glimpse into the troubled production's original vision. Over time, modern audiences have reappraised Scream 4. Its commentary on social media fame and "remake" culture, which was considered confusing or cynical in 2011, is now seen as remarkably prescient. Hayden Panettiere’s character, Kirby, instantly became a fan favorite, ultimately leading to her highly anticipated return in Scream VI. While Scream 4 temporarily "killed" the franchise until the 2022 reboot, many fans now rank it among the best sequels for its bold "Jill Roberts" reveal and sharp meta-commentary, recognizing its ahead-of-its-time themes and enduring impact.

Scream 4 (2011) Scream 4 stands as a pivotal entry in the iconic slasher franchise. Though it initially struggled at the box office, the film has since garnered a significant cult following, largely due to its surprisingly prescient themes. The movie marked the return of original director Wes Craven and writer Kevin Williamson, who envisioned Scream 4 as the launchpad for a new trilogy. Before production began, Kevin Williamson "sketched out" concepts for Scream 5 and 6. In Williamson’s original concept, Jill Roberts was supposed to survive the events of Scream 4 and "get away with it all". The planned sequel, Scream 5, would have followed Jill as a "hero" at college, only to be stalked by a new Ghostface who knew the truth about her crimes. These plans were abandoned due to the film's lower-than-expected domestic box office performance and the passing of Wes Craven in 2015. The production of Scream 4 was notoriously difficult. Extensive script rewrites by Ehren Kruger (who penned Scream 3) occurred throughout filming. Early 2011 test screenings further necessitated four days of reshoots for two key sequences involving Aimee Teegarden and Alison Brie. Craven utilized computer-generated effects for the first time, adding knife blades in post-production to facilitate safer and more aggressive stabbing scenes. Unlike the California setting of the original, Scream 4 was filmed entirely in and around Ann Arbor, Michigan, chosen by the production team for its close resemblance to the fictional "Woodsboro." Despite its ambition, Scream 4's theatrical performance was underwhelming. It remains the only film in the series not to surpass the $100 million mark. Analysts attributed this lukewarm reception to an 11-year gap since Scream 3, an aging fan base, and stiff competition from Insidious, which dominated the horror market at the time. Despite its disappointing theatrical run, Scream 4 found greater success on home media. It debuted at #2 on the U.S. rental charts and remained in the top 20 for seven consecutive weeks, generating approximately $10.3 million in domestic DVD and Blu-ray sales. The Blu-ray release further catered to fans with 17 deleted/extended scenes, a gag reel, and an alternate opening/ending, offering a glimpse into the troubled production's original vision. Over time, modern audiences have reappraised Scream 4. Its commentary on social media fame and "remake" culture, which was considered confusing or cynical in 2011, is now seen as remarkably prescient. Hayden Panettiere’s character, Kirby, instantly became a fan favorite, ultimately leading to her highly anticipated return in Scream VI. While Scream 4 temporarily "killed" the franchise until the 2022 reboot, many fans now rank it among the best sequels for its bold "Jill Roberts" reveal and sharp meta-commentary, recognizing its ahead-of-its-time themes and enduring impact.

Tom😈Loves❤️Horror😱

15,420 views • 5 months ago

This hasn't done the rounds as much as other clips from Saturday but... Footage showed Stand Up to Racism protestors openly celebrating and mocking the assassination of Charlie Kirk. They can be heard shouting: "Charlie's in a box... in a box!" "Where's your Charlie now?" This could be prosecuted under Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986. The provision prohibits the "use of threatening, abusive, or insulting words... that is threatening, abusive, or insulting, within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm, or distress". It was certainly implicitly threatening and abusive, and could likely have been heard by Unite the Kingdom protestors, causing alarm and distress. For context, people have been charged for celebrating the death of certain individuals in the UK before. Take Joseph Kelly, who celebrated the death of Sir Captain Tom Moore in 2021. He was formally charged, sentenced, and received a community payback order comprising 18 months of supervision and 150 hours of unpaid work. But Mark Rowley and the Met seemingly do not have time for such matters.

This hasn't done the rounds as much as other clips from Saturday but... Footage showed Stand Up to Racism protestors openly celebrating and mocking the assassination of Charlie Kirk. They can be heard shouting: "Charlie's in a box... in a box!" "Where's your Charlie now?" This could be prosecuted under Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986. The provision prohibits the "use of threatening, abusive, or insulting words... that is threatening, abusive, or insulting, within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm, or distress". It was certainly implicitly threatening and abusive, and could likely have been heard by Unite the Kingdom protestors, causing alarm and distress. For context, people have been charged for celebrating the death of certain individuals in the UK before. Take Joseph Kelly, who celebrated the death of Sir Captain Tom Moore in 2021. He was formally charged, sentenced, and received a community payback order comprising 18 months of supervision and 150 hours of unpaid work. But Mark Rowley and the Met seemingly do not have time for such matters.

The Stark Naked Brief.

27,293 views • 10 months ago

🚨 Blake Lively ADMITS she misrepresented her role in a resurfaced 2022 Forbes Power Women’s Summit video, and Justin Baldoni’s legal team needs to see this. In the clip, Blake openly brags about getting hired only as an actress, then forcing her way into full creative control over projects. Legally, this could be a contract violation, fraudulent misrepresentation, and interference with production, all relevant to Baldoni’s lawsuit against her for defamation and civil extortion. If she did this on the It Ends With Us movie, she not only overstepped her contractual role but also took over Baldoni’s creative control as director, and now she’s suing him? If Justin only allowed Blake to take over because she was creating problems, faking illness, not showing up, making false claims, etc., then his consent wouldn’t be truly voluntary. In legal terms, this could be seen as duress or coercion, meaning he agreed under pressure to avoid bigger issues. Additionally, if Blake’s alleged workplace misconduct and false claims were used strategically to gain control, that could open the door to bad faith conduct or even defamation/civil extortion, which ties into Justin’s lawsuit. 📌 Watch the full video here👇: Watch the clip, does this prove Blake crossed the line? 🎥👇

🚨 Blake Lively ADMITS she misrepresented her role in a resurfaced 2022 Forbes Power Women’s Summit video, and Justin Baldoni’s legal team needs to see this. In the clip, Blake openly brags about getting hired only as an actress, then forcing her way into full creative control over projects. Legally, this could be a contract violation, fraudulent misrepresentation, and interference with production, all relevant to Baldoni’s lawsuit against her for defamation and civil extortion. If she did this on the It Ends With Us movie, she not only overstepped her contractual role but also took over Baldoni’s creative control as director, and now she’s suing him? If Justin only allowed Blake to take over because she was creating problems, faking illness, not showing up, making false claims, etc., then his consent wouldn’t be truly voluntary. In legal terms, this could be seen as duress or coercion, meaning he agreed under pressure to avoid bigger issues. Additionally, if Blake’s alleged workplace misconduct and false claims were used strategically to gain control, that could open the door to bad faith conduct or even defamation/civil extortion, which ties into Justin’s lawsuit. 📌 Watch the full video here👇: Watch the clip, does this prove Blake crossed the line? 🎥👇

The Spiritual Shift

1,574,260 views • 1 year ago

Why would a high level satanic witch who does “spirit cooking” and is deeply connected to the occult, Marina Abromovic refer to Trump as “The greatest thing to ever happen to us” and “Magician of the highest order”? When she says order, she is likely referring to the Masonic/satanic “The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn”. In this clip, which came out prior to Trump’s second election, you can VERY CLEARLY hear her say “He is there to create confusion in order” when referring to Trump. Is that not awfully similar to the credo of the Masonic New World Order: Order out of Chaos (Ordo ab Chao)? Basically what she is saying is that Trump’s role on the world stage is to cause confusion and chaos, more easily paving the way for the Man of Perdition (Antichrist) to take power. That’s NO simple slip of the tongue or Freudian slip… It is a SMOKING GUN. That is Marina telling us, with full conviction and confidence that Donald Trump IS a chaos agent working for the NWO agenda, and that he IS part of their club. Everything you see about opposition to Trump is Hegelian Dialectic style THEATRICS. They tell/show us WHO they really are all of the time, it is up to us to BELIEVE THEM. WAKE UP!!!

Why would a high level satanic witch who does “spirit cooking” and is deeply connected to the occult, Marina Abromovic refer to Trump as “The greatest thing to ever happen to us” and “Magician of the highest order”? When she says order, she is likely referring to the Masonic/satanic “The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn”. In this clip, which came out prior to Trump’s second election, you can VERY CLEARLY hear her say “He is there to create confusion in order” when referring to Trump. Is that not awfully similar to the credo of the Masonic New World Order: Order out of Chaos (Ordo ab Chao)? Basically what she is saying is that Trump’s role on the world stage is to cause confusion and chaos, more easily paving the way for the Man of Perdition (Antichrist) to take power. That’s NO simple slip of the tongue or Freudian slip… It is a SMOKING GUN. That is Marina telling us, with full conviction and confidence that Donald Trump IS a chaos agent working for the NWO agenda, and that he IS part of their club. Everything you see about opposition to Trump is Hegelian Dialectic style THEATRICS. They tell/show us WHO they really are all of the time, it is up to us to BELIEVE THEM. WAKE UP!!!

The Patriot Voice

190,252 views • 9 months ago

Katsuhiro Harada Michael Murray Bandai Namco US I regret to inform you that the cheating situation on Tekken 8 has gotten even worse than the last time I posted a video. Yes, this is a new video with a new & easier way to cheat on Tekken 8 ranked. This is not the same method as before. This is not a repost or an upload for clout. We are asking you to pay attention to the issues in your game. This new exploit is a HUGE problem. Once again, please share this video around as much as possible and watch it till the end. Tekken 8 is about to take an ugly nose dive in ranked if this doesn't get addressed. BlackHeart59_ 🇮🇹 & RomanLoL have discovered something far worse than before and a way of cheating that is accessible to absolutely everybody with a PC (we detail it in the first portion of the video). On top of that, the Discords that have loads of cheaters in them are updating their scripts on a regular basis which we detail in this video as well. This new video is to once again raise awareness on the ever evolving methods available to cheaters and given this new method we have recently discovered, I really hope you address it because absolutely ANYONE could do this without having to pay a hacker to create a script. Thank you to Destructoid & DashFight 👊 for posting articles about this. We hope you and other creators and players continue to signal boost this issue. Thank you for watching.

Katsuhiro Harada Michael Murray Bandai Namco US I regret to inform you that the cheating situation on Tekken 8 has gotten even worse than the last time I posted a video. Yes, this is a new video with a new & easier way to cheat on Tekken 8 ranked. This is not the same method as before. This is not a repost or an upload for clout. We are asking you to pay attention to the issues in your game. This new exploit is a HUGE problem. Once again, please share this video around as much as possible and watch it till the end. Tekken 8 is about to take an ugly nose dive in ranked if this doesn't get addressed. BlackHeart59_ 🇮🇹 & RomanLoL have discovered something far worse than before and a way of cheating that is accessible to absolutely everybody with a PC (we detail it in the first portion of the video). On top of that, the Discords that have loads of cheaters in them are updating their scripts on a regular basis which we detail in this video as well. This new video is to once again raise awareness on the ever evolving methods available to cheaters and given this new method we have recently discovered, I really hope you address it because absolutely ANYONE could do this without having to pay a hacker to create a script. Thank you to Destructoid & DashFight 👊 for posting articles about this. We hope you and other creators and players continue to signal boost this issue. Thank you for watching.

Mike Hollow

25,408 views • 1 year ago

"The crypto world has one very powerful idea going for it, and that's the idea of forks..." - George Hotz 🌑 I consider the ability to fork as the most underrated aspect of crypto. People forget it's the power to fork that allows cryptocurrencies to avoid centralized control, and ensure resilience against censorship, and disagreements within the community. This is what happened to the Bitcoin Cash network in late 2020. The lead developers forked the network when they dissented with the majority and decided to chart their own path by creating eCash - old handle placeholder. Anyone who held BCH through the eCash fork would now also hold an equivalent amount of XEC. Just as George describes in the clip below, holders are faced with a choice. They can split their coins, choose to sell one fork to buy more of the other, or do nothing and hold onto both. But if you held your BCH on Coinbase 🛡️, Gemini or Kraken, those exchanges have so far acted as if this fork never happened. In other words, their customers have been prevented from making a choice. While I can understand wanting to see if a fork is even viable before listing it on your exchange, the fact is over the past four years, eCash - old handle placeholder has proven itself to be one of the most technically proficient development teams in all of crypto. XEC is listed on many top tier exchanges such as Binance and Upbit Global and the team is available to offer any assistance if needed. I am urging Brian Armstrong and Jesse Powell, as well as Emilie Choi 🛡️ and Rishi to take a look at the eCash project. I am asking as respectfully as I can, please do the right thing and give your customers their eCash and let them choose for themselves. Plus, wouldn't it be great for your customers to suddenly be rewarded with free eCash they likely didn't even know they had? I'm guessing it would.

"The crypto world has one very powerful idea going for it, and that's the idea of forks..." - George Hotz 🌑 I consider the ability to fork as the most underrated aspect of crypto. People forget it's the power to fork that allows cryptocurrencies to avoid centralized control, and ensure resilience against censorship, and disagreements within the community. This is what happened to the Bitcoin Cash network in late 2020. The lead developers forked the network when they dissented with the majority and decided to chart their own path by creating eCash - old handle placeholder. Anyone who held BCH through the eCash fork would now also hold an equivalent amount of XEC. Just as George describes in the clip below, holders are faced with a choice. They can split their coins, choose to sell one fork to buy more of the other, or do nothing and hold onto both. But if you held your BCH on Coinbase 🛡️, Gemini or Kraken, those exchanges have so far acted as if this fork never happened. In other words, their customers have been prevented from making a choice. While I can understand wanting to see if a fork is even viable before listing it on your exchange, the fact is over the past four years, eCash - old handle placeholder has proven itself to be one of the most technically proficient development teams in all of crypto. XEC is listed on many top tier exchanges such as Binance and Upbit Global and the team is available to offer any assistance if needed. I am urging Brian Armstrong and Jesse Powell, as well as Emilie Choi 🛡️ and Rishi to take a look at the eCash project. I am asking as respectfully as I can, please do the right thing and give your customers their eCash and let them choose for themselves. Plus, wouldn't it be great for your customers to suddenly be rewarded with free eCash they likely didn't even know they had? I'm guessing it would.

Cain's Chronicles

11,395 views • 1 year ago

🚨📣 New FSU Member Testimonial Polly Clark is a novelist and TS Eliot Prize–shortlisted poet who recently published Afterlife: New and Selected Poems. Before publication, Polly was informed by her publicist that Gutter Magazine had selected her book as its ‘Book of the Month’, describing it as ‘funny, feminine and violent; confessional yet mysterious’. The review was initially published but disappeared after a few days. When pressed on why it had been removed, Gutter said: ‘A reader drew our attention to social media posts by Polly Clark that they considered to be offensive.’ Gutter added that it is a ‘welcoming publishing space’, including for trans writers and that, by promoting Ms Clark, it ‘risked undermining this goal’. Ms Clark has raised the issue with both Gutter and Creative Scotland — the body that provides funding to the magazine — but neither has agreed to reinstate the review or address its removal. Gutter has described this as an ‘editorial decision’, while Creative Scotland has stated that it ‘does not play a regulatory role’ in relation to the organisations it funds. Far too often, writers are censored because someone has taken offence at their work. In this case, it is almost certainly due to Ms Clark’s gender-critical views — which are protected under the Equality Act 2010 and reaffirmed by the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling last April. The Free Speech Union and Freedom in the Arts are supporting Polly and have helped her submit a Subject Access Request (SAR), as well as draft complaint emails to Creative Scotland. We are awaiting the SAR results. Watch Polly below 👇

🚨📣 New FSU Member Testimonial Polly Clark is a novelist and TS Eliot Prize–shortlisted poet who recently published Afterlife: New and Selected Poems. Before publication, Polly was informed by her publicist that Gutter Magazine had selected her book as its ‘Book of the Month’, describing it as ‘funny, feminine and violent; confessional yet mysterious’. The review was initially published but disappeared after a few days. When pressed on why it had been removed, Gutter said: ‘A reader drew our attention to social media posts by Polly Clark that they considered to be offensive.’ Gutter added that it is a ‘welcoming publishing space’, including for trans writers and that, by promoting Ms Clark, it ‘risked undermining this goal’. Ms Clark has raised the issue with both Gutter and Creative Scotland — the body that provides funding to the magazine — but neither has agreed to reinstate the review or address its removal. Gutter has described this as an ‘editorial decision’, while Creative Scotland has stated that it ‘does not play a regulatory role’ in relation to the organisations it funds. Far too often, writers are censored because someone has taken offence at their work. In this case, it is almost certainly due to Ms Clark’s gender-critical views — which are protected under the Equality Act 2010 and reaffirmed by the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling last April. The Free Speech Union and Freedom in the Arts are supporting Polly and have helped her submit a Subject Access Request (SAR), as well as draft complaint emails to Creative Scotland. We are awaiting the SAR results. Watch Polly below 👇

The Free Speech Union

48,835 views • 4 months ago

Day 3: Sangam Supermarket. After two days of passing by and seeing fresh produce and dry goods sitting outside, sandwiched between two banks of dumpsters, in 90 degree weather - I thought surely it wouldn’t happen for a third day. I was wrong and it’s actually worse than I originally thought. This isn’t a dwelling delivery waiting to be brought it, it’s food being brought out of the backroom to be being stored in the elements. Watch as their staff brings pallet after pallet of food outside and then remove items from the pallets to take back inside for their customers to purchase. While observing, a light rain even began to fall on the food being warehoused outside in the elements. Mind you, this isn’t a third world nation - this is North Houston, where the TFER clearly prohibits just about everything you’ll see in this video. How far do we have to allow standards to fall before the Houston Health Dept or Harris County Public Health #GetVaxxed take action against this grocer? Why are they allowing careless actions and blatant disregard for public health controls to become standard operating procedure for this business? Greg Abbott Is this the type of business you are proud of bringing to Texas? Is this what you meant when you said, “Texas will be a land for the Indian community?” We don’t want to see Texas become the third world - please take a stand for public health and basic common sense. Stand by for part 4.

Day 3: Sangam Supermarket. After two days of passing by and seeing fresh produce and dry goods sitting outside, sandwiched between two banks of dumpsters, in 90 degree weather - I thought surely it wouldn’t happen for a third day. I was wrong and it’s actually worse than I originally thought. This isn’t a dwelling delivery waiting to be brought it, it’s food being brought out of the backroom to be being stored in the elements. Watch as their staff brings pallet after pallet of food outside and then remove items from the pallets to take back inside for their customers to purchase. While observing, a light rain even began to fall on the food being warehoused outside in the elements. Mind you, this isn’t a third world nation - this is North Houston, where the TFER clearly prohibits just about everything you’ll see in this video. How far do we have to allow standards to fall before the Houston Health Dept or Harris County Public Health #GetVaxxed take action against this grocer? Why are they allowing careless actions and blatant disregard for public health controls to become standard operating procedure for this business? Greg Abbott Is this the type of business you are proud of bringing to Texas? Is this what you meant when you said, “Texas will be a land for the Indian community?” We don’t want to see Texas become the third world - please take a stand for public health and basic common sense. Stand by for part 4.

Nick Plumb

57,978 views • 2 months ago

A new menace has overtaken us and we are witnessing its growing grip on society-online gambling. As destructive as substance abuse which we are already battling, it’s luring thousands into addiction as ‘entertainment,’ destroying them and their families and corroding our moral fabric. It demands our immediate attention. The government must act on it, it’s their duty. Development is not merely the economic upliftment of people or building infrastructure for them while they are morally and spiritually lowered and lost. That defies its purpose. So comprehensive plan and actions need to be put in place to ensure that these serious concern are addressed on urgent basis. At the community and social level people also have to be proactive dealing with this. All cannot be left to the Government. Religious scholars have a key role to play in creating moral awareness about these issues in the light of religious teachings and values and disseminate the message among people through all mediums available. Addressing the youth during a Nikah Khutba, where I spoke about the need to build our lives on the foundation of Islamic character, self-control, and social responsibility, in the background of these issues. I also appeal to the judiciary to take serious note of this issue and immediately impose a ban on this menace before more damage is done.

A new menace has overtaken us and we are witnessing its growing grip on society-online gambling. As destructive as substance abuse which we are already battling, it’s luring thousands into addiction as ‘entertainment,’ destroying them and their families and corroding our moral fabric. It demands our immediate attention. The government must act on it, it’s their duty. Development is not merely the economic upliftment of people or building infrastructure for them while they are morally and spiritually lowered and lost. That defies its purpose. So comprehensive plan and actions need to be put in place to ensure that these serious concern are addressed on urgent basis. At the community and social level people also have to be proactive dealing with this. All cannot be left to the Government. Religious scholars have a key role to play in creating moral awareness about these issues in the light of religious teachings and values and disseminate the message among people through all mediums available. Addressing the youth during a Nikah Khutba, where I spoke about the need to build our lives on the foundation of Islamic character, self-control, and social responsibility, in the background of these issues. I also appeal to the judiciary to take serious note of this issue and immediately impose a ban on this menace before more damage is done.

Mirwaiz Umar Farooq

48,400 views • 1 year ago

A Heartbreaking Encounter with Somali Children in Need** While visiting a neighbor, a woman came across five young children in a small bush house, sitting on the ground with plastic sheets beneath them. Their eyes were hopeful, waiting for someone to bring them food that day. Their mother had gone to the city in search of work, their father was likely deceased, and their uncle appeared to be struggling with mental health issues, as could be inferred from their conversation. Among the children were four boys and one girl, all looking fragile and uncertain. When the kind woman arrived at lunchtime, she asked them if they had eaten that day. The eldest boy responded, “No, we haven’t eaten since yesterday.” The woman inquired about breakfast or lunch, and they all shook their heads, saying they only had tea. This prompted her to talk to the teenage girl, who confirmed their heartbreaking reality: “We haven’t eaten anything since yesterday. There’s no food in the house—no rations, nothing, just tea.” This encounter powerfully reminds us of the suffering faced by so many. It highlights the importance of compassion and the need for support for those in desperate situations. We must remember our responsibility to help others in need and take action to support children like these, who deserve hope and nourishment.

A Heartbreaking Encounter with Somali Children in Need** While visiting a neighbor, a woman came across five young children in a small bush house, sitting on the ground with plastic sheets beneath them. Their eyes were hopeful, waiting for someone to bring them food that day. Their mother had gone to the city in search of work, their father was likely deceased, and their uncle appeared to be struggling with mental health issues, as could be inferred from their conversation. Among the children were four boys and one girl, all looking fragile and uncertain. When the kind woman arrived at lunchtime, she asked them if they had eaten that day. The eldest boy responded, “No, we haven’t eaten since yesterday.” The woman inquired about breakfast or lunch, and they all shook their heads, saying they only had tea. This prompted her to talk to the teenage girl, who confirmed their heartbreaking reality: “We haven’t eaten anything since yesterday. There’s no food in the house—no rations, nothing, just tea.” This encounter powerfully reminds us of the suffering faced by so many. It highlights the importance of compassion and the need for support for those in desperate situations. We must remember our responsibility to help others in need and take action to support children like these, who deserve hope and nourishment.

Suleiman Hashi

50,830 views • 1 year ago

Sean Carney, brother of Mark Carney Mark Carney Canada’s de facto Prime Minister, is a sinister figure in a web of financial schemes hinting at corruption, tax evasion, and potential money laundering, all while hiding behind elite connections. With Mark Carney in such a powerful role, it’s shameful that Sean has spent years in high finance and royal circles, his actions stinking of insider dealings and unaccounted corruption. He’s avoided charges despite ties to scandal ridden institutions, fueling suspicion he’s shielded by corrupt forces propping up his brother, a vile display of elitism leaving the public exposed to their unchecked power. His links to money schemes and insider trading are a scandal waiting to erupt, and the lack of accountability is disgraceful. Sean’s career is a trail of roles at institutions known for shady practices, each raising questions about his role in financial misconduct. He started at Goldman Sachs in the 1980s, a firm notorious for global financial crises and ethical breaches, likely learning to exploit systems for gain. He then joined Sullivan and Cromwell LLP, a legal giant tied to defending corporate crooks, suggesting he mastered navigating financial loopholes. His decade at Merrill Lynch, rising to Managing Director, overlapped with the firm’s racial discrimination lawsuits and 2008 financial collapse, casting suspicion on his involvement in their dirty dealings. He later joined HSBC from 2003 to 2008, a bank infamous for laundering billions in drug money and aiding tax evasion, showing a pattern of gravitating toward corruption riddled entities, likely using his roles to engage in illicit financial activities while dodging scrutiny. Sean’s career later shifted to philanthropy and private equity, sectors often used by the wealthy to conceal misdeeds. His role as COO of The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation from 2009 to 2013 raises alarms, as such groups are often exploited by elites to funnel money, dodge taxes, and maintain influence under charity’s guise. His stint as President and CEO of a Single Family Office from 2013 to 2016, managing an unnamed wealthy family’s affairs, stinks of secrecy and backroom deals thriving in high finance’s shadows. His role at Telemos Capital from 2017 to 2023, a private equity firm, adds to the suspicion, as these entities often hide tax evasion and fraud behind opacity. Each career move seems designed to maximize access to wealth and power while keeping activities hidden, a sign of someone potentially deep in money laundering and corrupt schemes. Most alarming is Sean’s current role as COO of the Household of TRH The Prince and Princess of Wales, placing him at the core of the British Royal Family, an institution mired in scandals. Working from Kensington Palace, with a property at 15 Brunswick Gardens worth over three million pounds, his position screams privilege and insider connections unacceptable for the brother of Canada’s leader. This address, tied to companies he’s directed, raises questions about its use as a front for financial dealings involving tax evasion or worse. His proximity to the Royal Family, paired with his history in scandal plagued institutions, suggests he’s exploited his brother’s influence to secure a role where he can operate with impunity, possibly facilitating corrupt activities under royal protection. It’s a vile display of elitism, with the Carney brothers seemingly above the law, their connections shielding them from accountability. Mark Carney’s own controversies, like his role at Brookfield Asset Management with funds in Bermuda’s tax haven, heighten suspicion around Sean. The Carney brothers appear as corrupt insiders, using their positions to enrich themselves while evading taxes and possibly laundering money at the public’s expense. Sean’s presence at Mark’s swearing in ceremony, noted in the X post, underscores their entrenchment in power, likely using influence to further their interests.

Sean Carney, brother of Mark Carney Mark Carney Canada’s de facto Prime Minister, is a sinister figure in a web of financial schemes hinting at corruption, tax evasion, and potential money laundering, all while hiding behind elite connections. With Mark Carney in such a powerful role, it’s shameful that Sean has spent years in high finance and royal circles, his actions stinking of insider dealings and unaccounted corruption. He’s avoided charges despite ties to scandal ridden institutions, fueling suspicion he’s shielded by corrupt forces propping up his brother, a vile display of elitism leaving the public exposed to their unchecked power. His links to money schemes and insider trading are a scandal waiting to erupt, and the lack of accountability is disgraceful. Sean’s career is a trail of roles at institutions known for shady practices, each raising questions about his role in financial misconduct. He started at Goldman Sachs in the 1980s, a firm notorious for global financial crises and ethical breaches, likely learning to exploit systems for gain. He then joined Sullivan and Cromwell LLP, a legal giant tied to defending corporate crooks, suggesting he mastered navigating financial loopholes. His decade at Merrill Lynch, rising to Managing Director, overlapped with the firm’s racial discrimination lawsuits and 2008 financial collapse, casting suspicion on his involvement in their dirty dealings. He later joined HSBC from 2003 to 2008, a bank infamous for laundering billions in drug money and aiding tax evasion, showing a pattern of gravitating toward corruption riddled entities, likely using his roles to engage in illicit financial activities while dodging scrutiny. Sean’s career later shifted to philanthropy and private equity, sectors often used by the wealthy to conceal misdeeds. His role as COO of The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation from 2009 to 2013 raises alarms, as such groups are often exploited by elites to funnel money, dodge taxes, and maintain influence under charity’s guise. His stint as President and CEO of a Single Family Office from 2013 to 2016, managing an unnamed wealthy family’s affairs, stinks of secrecy and backroom deals thriving in high finance’s shadows. His role at Telemos Capital from 2017 to 2023, a private equity firm, adds to the suspicion, as these entities often hide tax evasion and fraud behind opacity. Each career move seems designed to maximize access to wealth and power while keeping activities hidden, a sign of someone potentially deep in money laundering and corrupt schemes. Most alarming is Sean’s current role as COO of the Household of TRH The Prince and Princess of Wales, placing him at the core of the British Royal Family, an institution mired in scandals. Working from Kensington Palace, with a property at 15 Brunswick Gardens worth over three million pounds, his position screams privilege and insider connections unacceptable for the brother of Canada’s leader. This address, tied to companies he’s directed, raises questions about its use as a front for financial dealings involving tax evasion or worse. His proximity to the Royal Family, paired with his history in scandal plagued institutions, suggests he’s exploited his brother’s influence to secure a role where he can operate with impunity, possibly facilitating corrupt activities under royal protection. It’s a vile display of elitism, with the Carney brothers seemingly above the law, their connections shielding them from accountability. Mark Carney’s own controversies, like his role at Brookfield Asset Management with funds in Bermuda’s tax haven, heighten suspicion around Sean. The Carney brothers appear as corrupt insiders, using their positions to enrich themselves while evading taxes and possibly laundering money at the public’s expense. Sean’s presence at Mark’s swearing in ceremony, noted in the X post, underscores their entrenchment in power, likely using influence to further their interests.

Vote Canada

59,119 views • 1 year ago

$TSLA ABOVE $361.59 – BUY SIGNAL IN PLAY Please ❤️like and 🔁share with fellow Tesla traders/investors #Tesla successfully tested the $338.27 long-term channel bottom (1-year structure) after the earlier breakdown below ~$432. #TSLA had a strong bounce, which confirms this level as major support (for now). The downside objective is now complete, and the bias has shifted from bearish to cautiously bullish. * As long as $TSLA holds above $338.27, the strategy is to stay long/bullish. Target: $432.90 (major structure), extension: $440–$450+ into May–July. Stock may chop sideways in a wide range (roughly $330s → $430s) through Q3. It's likely volatile, range-bound accumulation before higher. If $TSLA closes below $338.27 by ~1% (≈ $334.87), that triggers a new 3–5 month sell signal down to ~$224.55. * Key pivot right now is $361.59. This is the decision level for the next few days. If #TSLA closes above $361.59 at the end of the week, it triggers a 3–5 day buy signal with $386.93 (short-term resistance) target. If that breaks, a move toward $432.90 by late May is expected. If $TSLA fails below $361.59, expect a pullback to $338.27. We could possibly see a choppy move in the upper $330s and the “Wedge formation” over the next few weeks. * So, for short-term traders, take profits near $386.93 (2–3 week target). For position traders, stay long above $338. For aggressive traders, trade the $361 pivot break (up or down). * Watch the full $TSLA Trading Plan for Apr 15, 2026 in this short video🔽

$TSLA ABOVE $361.59 – BUY SIGNAL IN PLAY Please ❤️like and 🔁share with fellow Tesla traders/investors #Tesla successfully tested the $338.27 long-term channel bottom (1-year structure) after the earlier breakdown below ~$432. #TSLA had a strong bounce, which confirms this level as major support (for now). The downside objective is now complete, and the bias has shifted from bearish to cautiously bullish. * As long as $TSLA holds above $338.27, the strategy is to stay long/bullish. Target: $432.90 (major structure), extension: $440–$450+ into May–July. Stock may chop sideways in a wide range (roughly $330s → $430s) through Q3. It's likely volatile, range-bound accumulation before higher. If $TSLA closes below $338.27 by ~1% (≈ $334.87), that triggers a new 3–5 month sell signal down to ~$224.55. * Key pivot right now is $361.59. This is the decision level for the next few days. If #TSLA closes above $361.59 at the end of the week, it triggers a 3–5 day buy signal with $386.93 (short-term resistance) target. If that breaks, a move toward $432.90 by late May is expected. If $TSLA fails below $361.59, expect a pullback to $338.27. We could possibly see a choppy move in the upper $330s and the “Wedge formation” over the next few weeks. * So, for short-term traders, take profits near $386.93 (2–3 week target). For position traders, stay long above $338. For aggressive traders, trade the $361 pivot break (up or down). * Watch the full $TSLA Trading Plan for Apr 15, 2026 in this short video🔽

Wicked Stocks

23,490 views • 3 months ago

$This driver turned a simple paperwork mistake into a mandatory felony arrest in under five minutes. Once the deputy confirmed that Rebecca’s license was permanently revoked, the nature of the interaction immediately shifted from a routine traffic infraction to a criminal investigation. Under Florida law, driving with a permanently revoked or suspended license is a criminal offense, meaning the deputy no longer had the discretion to simply issue a warning for the obscured plate and let her go. The confrontation usually escalates due to a combination of denial and legal misconceptions: The driver repeatedly denies the suspension, likely expecting the officer to take her word over the official database dispatch system. Presenting expired or irrelevant paperwork is a common stall tactic, but it does nothing to override the real-time computerized records the officer is viewing on their MDT (Mobile Data Terminal). Shouting into a cell phone that she is "about to be arrested" serves as a self-fulfilling prophecy. Instead of de-escalating, it heightens tension and signals to the officer that the driver is mentally preparing to resist. When the deputy ordered her out of the vehicle, Rebecca crossed a legal point of no return by refusing. Per the landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling Pennsylvania v. Mimms (1977), a police officer has the absolute authority to order a driver out of a vehicle during a lawful traffic stop for officer safety. Refusing to comply with this lawful order is inherently a crime (Resisting an Officer Without Violence). By physically resisting the extraction and threatening violence ("threatening to punch the officer"), the driver legally compounded her issues. What would have likely been a misdemeanor charge for driving on a suspended license and non-violent resisting quickly escalated into felony territory due to the explicit threats against law enforcement. Ultimately, the passenger's subsequent conversation with the deputy highlights the tragic irony of the situation. The root cause—a failure to complete a mandatory Basic Driver Improvement (BDI) class—was an administrative issue that could have been sorted out through the court and the DMV. By choosing physical and verbal resistance over compliance, the driver transformed a fixable paperwork problem into a severe criminal arrest.$

This driver turned a simple paperwork mistake into a mandatory felony arrest in under five minutes. Once the deputy confirmed that Rebecca’s license was permanently revoked, the nature of the interaction immediately shifted from a routine traffic infraction to a criminal investigation. Under Florida law, driving with a permanently revoked or suspended license is a criminal offense, meaning the deputy no longer had the discretion to simply issue a warning for the obscured plate and let her go. The confrontation usually escalates due to a combination of denial and legal misconceptions: The driver repeatedly denies the suspension, likely expecting the officer to take her word over the official database dispatch system. Presenting expired or irrelevant paperwork is a common stall tactic, but it does nothing to override the real-time computerized records the officer is viewing on their MDT (Mobile Data Terminal). Shouting into a cell phone that she is "about to be arrested" serves as a self-fulfilling prophecy. Instead of de-escalating, it heightens tension and signals to the officer that the driver is mentally preparing to resist. When the deputy ordered her out of the vehicle, Rebecca crossed a legal point of no return by refusing. Per the landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling Pennsylvania v. Mimms (1977), a police officer has the absolute authority to order a driver out of a vehicle during a lawful traffic stop for officer safety. Refusing to comply with this lawful order is inherently a crime (Resisting an Officer Without Violence). By physically resisting the extraction and threatening violence ("threatening to punch the officer"), the driver legally compounded her issues. What would have likely been a misdemeanor charge for driving on a suspended license and non-violent resisting quickly escalated into felony territory due to the explicit threats against law enforcement. Ultimately, the passenger's subsequent conversation with the deputy highlights the tragic irony of the situation. The root cause—a failure to complete a mandatory Basic Driver Improvement (BDI) class—was an administrative issue that could have been sorted out through the court and the DMV. By choosing physical and verbal resistance over compliance, the driver transformed a fixable paperwork problem into a severe criminal arrest.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

14,369 views • 2 months ago

Freedom Convoy legal update 🇨🇦⚖️ • Tamara Lich and Chris Barber were convicted of mischief for their lead roles in the 2022 Ottawa convoy. Barber was also convicted of counselling others to disobey a court order. • The trial judge imposed 18-month conditional sentences (house arrest/curfew), not prison. • The Crown originally sought 7 years in prison for Tamara Lich and 8 years for Chris Barber, and is appealing for harsher sentences. • Lich and Barber are also appealing their convictions. • The appeals are expected to be heard in Spring 2027. • A separate Ottawa class-action lawsuit was filed on February 4, 2022 and now seeks $290 million in damages, including: * 💰 $60 million for pain and suffering * 💼 $70 million for business losses * 💵 $150 million for lost wages * ⚖️ $10 million in punitive damages * Plus legal costs, interest, and forfeiture of certain convoy funds if the plaintiffs succeed. • The class action is still before the courts. It has not yet gone to trial or resulted in a damages award. The principal named defendants in the class action include: Tamara Lich Chris Barber Patrick King Benjamin Dichter James Bauder Brigitte Belton Daniel Bulford Tom Marazzo Along with several other individuals, the group Freedom 2022 Human Rights and Freedoms, and unnamed John and Jane Does. –——————————————————————————— If someone is serving a conditional sentence for helping paralyze Ottawa, costing the country a 3.9 billion loss. —then appearing at political-style events with MAGA foreign officials — while appeals and a $290M class action are still active — raises serious public-confidence questions. Was this truly necessary “work,” or was Rebel News used as a loophole? Let’s not forget about their stolen electoral data breech tool to claim electoral signature forging. Canadians deserve transparency. 🇨🇦 Justice Canada Ontario Provincial Police Justin Trudeau Mark Carney Sean Fraser

Freedom Convoy legal update 🇨🇦⚖️ • Tamara Lich and Chris Barber were convicted of mischief for their lead roles in the 2022 Ottawa convoy. Barber was also convicted of counselling others to disobey a court order. • The trial judge imposed 18-month conditional sentences (house arrest/curfew), not prison. • The Crown originally sought 7 years in prison for Tamara Lich and 8 years for Chris Barber, and is appealing for harsher sentences. • Lich and Barber are also appealing their convictions. • The appeals are expected to be heard in Spring 2027. • A separate Ottawa class-action lawsuit was filed on February 4, 2022 and now seeks $290 million in damages, including: * 💰 $60 million for pain and suffering * 💼 $70 million for business losses * 💵 $150 million for lost wages * ⚖️ $10 million in punitive damages * Plus legal costs, interest, and forfeiture of certain convoy funds if the plaintiffs succeed. • The class action is still before the courts. It has not yet gone to trial or resulted in a damages award. The principal named defendants in the class action include: Tamara Lich Chris Barber Patrick King Benjamin Dichter James Bauder Brigitte Belton Daniel Bulford Tom Marazzo Along with several other individuals, the group Freedom 2022 Human Rights and Freedoms, and unnamed John and Jane Does. –——————————————————————————— If someone is serving a conditional sentence for helping paralyze Ottawa, costing the country a 3.9 billion loss. —then appearing at political-style events with MAGA foreign officials — while appeals and a $290M class action are still active — raises serious public-confidence questions. Was this truly necessary “work,” or was Rebel News used as a loophole? Let’s not forget about their stolen electoral data breech tool to claim electoral signature forging. Canadians deserve transparency. 🇨🇦 Justice Canada Ontario Provincial Police Justin Trudeau Mark Carney Sean Fraser

Liberty4Canada✨💗🪽

12,159 views • 1 month ago