Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

.John Ziegler: "I actually think we ought to be making voting as difficult as possible... the fact that we're making it so easy is a problem not just for Republicans, but for society at large." BTC: "I could not disagree more. I think that's perfectly emblematic of the conservative... show more

Brian Tyler Cohen

617,696 subscribers

142,986 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Something Stinks About Dominion Voting Machines and Elon Musk Can Smell It He finds it to be a “heck of a coincidence” that Philadelphia and Maricopa County use them, but “not in a lot of other places.” “I know a lot about computers, and I'm like, the last thing I would do is trust a computer program because it's just too easy to hack. It's too easy to add just one line, and it's really difficult to hack paper ballots. “So in-person voting with proof of ID, which, by the way, every country has. Almost every country that has democratic elections requires in-person voting with voter ID. “This is weird. It's super weird to not have that. I think that's the only way to effectively address fraud, given that we are where we are today. “I think we just need a very big margin of victory. If the margin of victory is big enough, then as I say, it's got to beat the cheat.”

Something Stinks About Dominion Voting Machines and Elon Musk Can Smell It He finds it to be a “heck of a coincidence” that Philadelphia and Maricopa County use them, but “not in a lot of other places.” “I know a lot about computers, and I'm like, the last thing I would do is trust a computer program because it's just too easy to hack. It's too easy to add just one line, and it's really difficult to hack paper ballots. “So in-person voting with proof of ID, which, by the way, every country has. Almost every country that has democratic elections requires in-person voting with voter ID. “This is weird. It's super weird to not have that. I think that's the only way to effectively address fraud, given that we are where we are today. “I think we just need a very big margin of victory. If the margin of victory is big enough, then as I say, it's got to beat the cheat.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

141,016 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

These people just do not understand democracy at all! I think that’s the actual cause of the problem. She refers to Nigel Farage as “that man” forgetting that is he is voted into power then that’s what the majority want! She wants to stop democracy not support it.

These people just do not understand democracy at all! I think that’s the actual cause of the problem. She refers to Nigel Farage as “that man” forgetting that is he is voted into power then that’s what the majority want! She wants to stop democracy not support it.

Bernie

128,326 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

One local resident brought up her concerns about election fraud, and Musk expressed that he could also smell something fishy with Dominion voting machines. In fact, Musk found it to be a “heck of a coincidence” that Philadelphia and Maricopa County use Dominion voting machines but “not in a lot of other places,” saying that the last thing he would want to do is trust a computer program “because it's just too easy to hack.” “I know a lot about computers, and I'm like, the last thing I would do is trust a computer program because it's just too easy to hack. It's too easy to add just one line, and it's really difficult to hack paper ballots. “So in-person voting with proof of ID, which, by the way, every country has. Almost every country that has democratic elections requires in-person voting with voter ID. “This is weird. It's super weird to not have that. I think that's the only way to effectively address fraud, given that we are where we are today. “I think we just need a very big margin of victory. If the margin of victory is big enough, then as I say, it's got to beat the cheat,” Musk said.

One local resident brought up her concerns about election fraud, and Musk expressed that he could also smell something fishy with Dominion voting machines. In fact, Musk found it to be a “heck of a coincidence” that Philadelphia and Maricopa County use Dominion voting machines but “not in a lot of other places,” saying that the last thing he would want to do is trust a computer program “because it's just too easy to hack.” “I know a lot about computers, and I'm like, the last thing I would do is trust a computer program because it's just too easy to hack. It's too easy to add just one line, and it's really difficult to hack paper ballots. “So in-person voting with proof of ID, which, by the way, every country has. Almost every country that has democratic elections requires in-person voting with voter ID. “This is weird. It's super weird to not have that. I think that's the only way to effectively address fraud, given that we are where we are today. “I think we just need a very big margin of victory. If the margin of victory is big enough, then as I say, it's got to beat the cheat,” Musk said.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

546,489 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The TRUTH is finally out “Tinder is full of transphobes… like, I just I have to believe that… because if that is not true, then it just means that I’m not nearly as pretty as I thought I was.” So we were destined to be transphobes regardless, unless we date them. 💀

The TRUTH is finally out “Tinder is full of transphobes… like, I just I have to believe that… because if that is not true, then it just means that I’m not nearly as pretty as I thought I was.” So we were destined to be transphobes regardless, unless we date them. 💀

L G B

168,608 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Elon Musk: You can also ask Grok about anything you see on the platform. You just press the Grok icon on any X post and it'll analyze it for you and research it as much as you want So you can basically have, just by tapping the Grok icon, you can assess whether that post is the truth, the whole truth, or nothing but the truth, or whether there's something supplemental or needs to be explained I think we've made a lot of progress towards freedom of speech and people being able to tell whether something is false or not false or propaganda. The recent update to Grok it's actually very good at piercing through propaganda And then we use that latest version of Grok to create Grokipedia, which I think is a much more, it's not just, I think, more neutral and more accurate than Wikipedia, but it actually has a lot more information than a Wikipedia page

Elon Musk: You can also ask Grok about anything you see on the platform. You just press the Grok icon on any X post and it'll analyze it for you and research it as much as you want So you can basically have, just by tapping the Grok icon, you can assess whether that post is the truth, the whole truth, or nothing but the truth, or whether there's something supplemental or needs to be explained I think we've made a lot of progress towards freedom of speech and people being able to tell whether something is false or not false or propaganda. The recent update to Grok it's actually very good at piercing through propaganda And then we use that latest version of Grok to create Grokipedia, which I think is a much more, it's not just, I think, more neutral and more accurate than Wikipedia, but it actually has a lot more information than a Wikipedia page

X Freeze

22,371,795 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Tomi Lahren just TRUTH NUKED Rep. Ro Khanna (D) to his face about how difficult Democrats make it to stop voter fraud "I'm told 'it's Jim Crow 2.0!' And 'married women and minorities are too DUMB or too poor to get an ID!" "And then I also get the answer that you gave us, which is that, well, voter fraud really isn't a problem, so why do we need to secure our elections?" "And the frustration that we have, and I guess myself has, when we talk about that is that every time you have Republicans like myself or President Trump talking about voter fraud, it's almost like taboo." "You can't say it because then you're accusing a rigged election or then you're making claims and you're going to get sued." "So this is what's frustrating for Republicans...we don't just want to say, 'oh, well, I guess we'll find it if it happens and then we won't talk about it!'" "We want to say, no, let's have a meaningful legislation to secure our elections! So we don't have any more discussion about this is rigged or that's rigged or this is an illegitimate president." "Wouldn't that just be so much easier, Congressman?!" 🔥🔥🔥

🚨 BREAKING: Tomi Lahren just TRUTH NUKED Rep. Ro Khanna (D) to his face about how difficult Democrats make it to stop voter fraud "I'm told 'it's Jim Crow 2.0!' And 'married women and minorities are too DUMB or too poor to get an ID!" "And then I also get the answer that you gave us, which is that, well, voter fraud really isn't a problem, so why do we need to secure our elections?" "And the frustration that we have, and I guess myself has, when we talk about that is that every time you have Republicans like myself or President Trump talking about voter fraud, it's almost like taboo." "You can't say it because then you're accusing a rigged election or then you're making claims and you're going to get sued." "So this is what's frustrating for Republicans...we don't just want to say, 'oh, well, I guess we'll find it if it happens and then we won't talk about it!'" "We want to say, no, let's have a meaningful legislation to secure our elections! So we don't have any more discussion about this is rigged or that's rigged or this is an illegitimate president." "Wouldn't that just be so much easier, Congressman?!" 🔥🔥🔥

Eric Daugherty

451,662 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"

Brian Kight

125,726 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

David Sacks: The Techno-Realist On E215, David Sacks explained a third category outside of techno-optimist and doomer: "Given the choice between the two categories of techno-optimist and techno-pessimist, I'm definitely in the optimist camp. And I think we should be." "But I think there's actually a third category that I would submit: techno-realist." "Which is, technology is going to happen. Trying to stop it is like ordering the tides to stop." "AI is going to happen. We might as well be the leader." "If we don't do it, somebody else will. China's going to do it or somebody else will do it." "If we don't, we could lose in a key category that has implications for national security, for our economy, for many things." "That's just not a world we want to live in." "So, I think a lot of this debate is sort of academic because the question is just, is it going to happen or not?" "And I think the answer is yes. So then we want to control it." "There's not a tremendous amount of choice in this, I think."

David Sacks: The Techno-Realist On E215, David Sacks explained a third category outside of techno-optimist and doomer: "Given the choice between the two categories of techno-optimist and techno-pessimist, I'm definitely in the optimist camp. And I think we should be." "But I think there's actually a third category that I would submit: techno-realist." "Which is, technology is going to happen. Trying to stop it is like ordering the tides to stop." "AI is going to happen. We might as well be the leader." "If we don't do it, somebody else will. China's going to do it or somebody else will do it." "If we don't, we could lose in a key category that has implications for national security, for our economy, for many things." "That's just not a world we want to live in." "So, I think a lot of this debate is sort of academic because the question is just, is it going to happen or not?" "And I think the answer is yes. So then we want to control it." "There's not a tremendous amount of choice in this, I think."

The All-In Podcast

154,319 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk: The real hard problem is to improve products while making them more affordable at the same time. “If you have a compelling product and it is affordable, so the value for money is good, and people have enough money to buy it, then demand is never going to be an issue. So, that is not something I worry about. I do worry about making sure that we can achieve affordability thresholds. Because even if you make the value for money infinite, if people do not have enough money to buy it, then it's just frustrating for people. They see this great product, too expensive, can't buy it. So, making the car affordable while continuing to improve the capabilities and quality of the product, that is the hardest problem.” Axel Springer Pioneer's Talk, December 1, 2020

Elon Musk: The real hard problem is to improve products while making them more affordable at the same time. “If you have a compelling product and it is affordable, so the value for money is good, and people have enough money to buy it, then demand is never going to be an issue. So, that is not something I worry about. I do worry about making sure that we can achieve affordability thresholds. Because even if you make the value for money infinite, if people do not have enough money to buy it, then it's just frustrating for people. They see this great product, too expensive, can't buy it. So, making the car affordable while continuing to improve the capabilities and quality of the product, that is the hardest problem.” Axel Springer Pioneer's Talk, December 1, 2020

ELON CLIPS

52,616 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

ELON: GROK IS THE BEST ASSISTANT TO FIGHT PROPAGANDA “You just press the Grok icon on any 𝕏 post and it will analyze it for you and research it as much as you want. So, just by tapping the Grok icon, you can assess whether that post is the truth, nothing but the truth, or whether there's something supplemental that needs to be explained. So, I think we've made a lot of progress towards freedom of speech and people being able to tell whether something is false or not false, or propaganda. The recent update to Grok is actually, I think, very good at piercing through propaganda. And then, we used that latest version of Grok to create Grokipedia. It's not just, I think, more neutral and more accurate than Wikipedia, but it actually has a lot more information than a Wikipedia page.” Source: All-In Podcast The All-In Podcast, October 31, 2025

ELON: GROK IS THE BEST ASSISTANT TO FIGHT PROPAGANDA “You just press the Grok icon on any 𝕏 post and it will analyze it for you and research it as much as you want. So, just by tapping the Grok icon, you can assess whether that post is the truth, nothing but the truth, or whether there's something supplemental that needs to be explained. So, I think we've made a lot of progress towards freedom of speech and people being able to tell whether something is false or not false, or propaganda. The recent update to Grok is actually, I think, very good at piercing through propaganda. And then, we used that latest version of Grok to create Grokipedia. It's not just, I think, more neutral and more accurate than Wikipedia, but it actually has a lot more information than a Wikipedia page.” Source: All-In Podcast The All-In Podcast, October 31, 2025

Mario Nawfal

1,641,186 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Elon Musk: I'm not completely libertarian. I just think it should be harder to establish a rule than to remove it. “I'm not completely libertarian in the sense I don't think there should be regulations at all. I just think that the natural bias of regulations is to last forever. You have to actively delete a regulation or a law, the way things are set up in most laws. Some laws have sunset provisions. And the problem with that is you get vested interests who like that law, and there's an inertia around it. And so over time, the body of law and regulations grows and grows and grows. It is something that I think is not ultimately good for society. So, in fact, I think it would generally be a good idea to have it such that it's hard to establish a rule and easy to remove one.” Montana Job Summit, September 16, 2013

Elon Musk: I'm not completely libertarian. I just think it should be harder to establish a rule than to remove it. “I'm not completely libertarian in the sense I don't think there should be regulations at all. I just think that the natural bias of regulations is to last forever. You have to actively delete a regulation or a law, the way things are set up in most laws. Some laws have sunset provisions. And the problem with that is you get vested interests who like that law, and there's an inertia around it. And so over time, the body of law and regulations grows and grows and grows. It is something that I think is not ultimately good for society. So, in fact, I think it would generally be a good idea to have it such that it's hard to establish a rule and easy to remove one.” Montana Job Summit, September 16, 2013

ELON CLIPS

51,729 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"The biggest thing is, I just think that we've got to be able to not just let things collapse, a little bit. Good plays are going to happen for the other team, that's just the league that we play in. We can't let one lead to another. I think that's just something we need to get better at. We have to have the intensity, the focus, as a whole team to weather the adversity storms and always just keep the belief that we're going to win. I think at times, we just let a few things lead to another instead of just shutting it down one play at a time." - Jaxson Dart

"The biggest thing is, I just think that we've got to be able to not just let things collapse, a little bit. Good plays are going to happen for the other team, that's just the league that we play in. We can't let one lead to another. I think that's just something we need to get better at. We have to have the intensity, the focus, as a whole team to weather the adversity storms and always just keep the belief that we're going to win. I think at times, we just let a few things lead to another instead of just shutting it down one play at a time." - Jaxson Dart

SNY Giants

78,845 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

John Tortorella was not a fan of all the Cutter Gauthier stuff tonight: "I think it's a bunch of bullshit. All I told our team is let's worry about ourselves and play a hockey game. The bullshit is for you guys. All the drama, that's for you guys, whatever you need to do with it." "You know what I hope? I hope we can play in front of a crowd like that about something meaningful. Not the shit, whatever you guys are talking about, I hope it means something to the organization as far as winning and losing. That's when we wanna see a crowd like that, not all this stuff you guys are talking about. I want it to be that we're a team to be reckoned with in a playoff series or whatever it may be, not this shit." #Flyers

John Tortorella was not a fan of all the Cutter Gauthier stuff tonight: "I think it's a bunch of bullshit. All I told our team is let's worry about ourselves and play a hockey game. The bullshit is for you guys. All the drama, that's for you guys, whatever you need to do with it." "You know what I hope? I hope we can play in front of a crowd like that about something meaningful. Not the shit, whatever you guys are talking about, I hope it means something to the organization as far as winning and losing. That's when we wanna see a crowd like that, not all this stuff you guys are talking about. I want it to be that we're a team to be reckoned with in a playoff series or whatever it may be, not this shit." #Flyers

Flyers Nation

348,935 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Marcus Milione wants Minted New York to become a massive brand, but does not think the path there is just dumping money into paid ads. "I want the brand to be as big as possible. When you're trying to build something like that, I don't think going slow and building a really strong foundation is a bad thing." "I think that there's a playbook where you just turn on the Meta ads faucet and just throw money at it. But I mean, we do very little advertising at all. 99.5% of our posts are organic." "That feels like a really nice, strong foundation where, if we want to turn on the paid advertising, it just makes our life a little bit because we're building a brand that people know. You're not just getting fed ads all the time, then ending up buying it and having no affiliation with the brand."

TBPN

29,968 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

lando: “dementia is not something that just people have as they get older. you can be born with it, young people can have it. and it affects over 50 million people around the world. so it's something that none of us want to have. and i'm a guy that my whole life is about memories. it's about creating those pictures in your mind. and the last thing i ever want to do is lose that as i get older. that's what everything in my life is about. so it's cool that i can go out and track. i can have my fun. i can go and race. but there's a kind of second meaning behind it all. and at the same time, i get to do something good for the world. and that's something that i love” ❤️❤️

lando: “dementia is not something that just people have as they get older. you can be born with it, young people can have it. and it affects over 50 million people around the world. so it's something that none of us want to have. and i'm a guy that my whole life is about memories. it's about creating those pictures in your mind. and the last thing i ever want to do is lose that as i get older. that's what everything in my life is about. so it's cool that i can go out and track. i can have my fun. i can go and race. but there's a kind of second meaning behind it all. and at the same time, i get to do something good for the world. and that's something that i love” ❤️❤️

ray

58,527 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"I think for the first part of the season, a fair number of games, I think we were a pretty stingy team with that collective effort, especially on the defensive side of the puck. I think we've lost a little bit of that just attention to detail and just collective play, cooperative play as a group. It's a whole lot more difficult to beat collective effort than it is to beat isolated effort. I think we're not quite connected like we were and that's what we've got to get back to." - Mike Sullivan

"I think for the first part of the season, a fair number of games, I think we were a pretty stingy team with that collective effort, especially on the defensive side of the puck. I think we've lost a little bit of that just attention to detail and just collective play, cooperative play as a group. It's a whole lot more difficult to beat collective effort than it is to beat isolated effort. I think we're not quite connected like we were and that's what we've got to get back to." - Mike Sullivan

Rangers Videos

19,109 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

Arjun Khemani

22,746 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Jen Psaki claims she is not a mouthpiece for the Democrat party, while Jon Stewart argues she's a 'prisoner to ratings': Jon Stewart: "MSNBC. Do they come to you every day and go: Here's what we think is important to preserve and fight for whatever." Jen Psaki: "You're not waiting to be told what to say about anything. You're going to say what you think, so people can trust that." Jon Stewart: "I disagree with that. I think it's not that you're able to be independent, it's that you're then a prisoner purely to the minute by minutes. Ratings, incentives and all those other things. If you don't have the ideological component right, then you don't have a governing authority of editorial authority, right?" Jen Psaki: "Nobody is, to the frustration at times of many elected Democrats, it is not a mouthpiece of the Democratic Party." Literal mouthpiece for the Democrat party, pretending she still does not have that title.

Jen Psaki claims she is not a mouthpiece for the Democrat party, while Jon Stewart argues she's a 'prisoner to ratings': Jon Stewart: "MSNBC. Do they come to you every day and go: Here's what we think is important to preserve and fight for whatever." Jen Psaki: "You're not waiting to be told what to say about anything. You're going to say what you think, so people can trust that." Jon Stewart: "I disagree with that. I think it's not that you're able to be independent, it's that you're then a prisoner purely to the minute by minutes. Ratings, incentives and all those other things. If you don't have the ideological component right, then you don't have a governing authority of editorial authority, right?" Jen Psaki: "Nobody is, to the frustration at times of many elected Democrats, it is not a mouthpiece of the Democratic Party." Literal mouthpiece for the Democrat party, pretending she still does not have that title.

Eric Abbenante

247,944 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr