Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

JOKs injuries to his arm didn’t come from exploding taillight. JOK wasn’t projected onto the lawn after being struck on only the arm by an SUV. 2 doctors hired by the federal government already told us this. The CW ignored them and paid Judson Welcher to say otherwise.

43,156 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 7

Фото профиля Look the Other Way
Look the Other Way1 год назад

JOK did not fall on his head so hard he cracked his skull open after being struck only in the arm

Фото профиля The Liberation Project
The Liberation Project1 год назад

𝐀 𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐂𝐄𝐎 𝐢𝐬 𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐓𝐡𝐞 ‘𝑾𝒐𝒓𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑪𝒍𝒂𝒔𝒔 𝑯𝒆𝒓𝒐’ Americans of all political affiliation suddenly woke up realize they agree that their healthcare system is inherently cruel and produces unnecessary misery. ★ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

Фото профиля Stephi King
Stephi King1 год назад

Whatever ‘expert’ the cw puts on the stand, Alessi will rip to shreds, as he’s been doing so far. They haven’t proven anything ‘beyond reasonable doubt’…just conflicting testimony & deceitful data analysts. That’s why Hank shows the KR clips…he’s got nothing else

Фото профиля Gerald Foss
Gerald Foss1 год назад

And they never changed their report like Welcher

Фото профиля v
v1 год назад

The CW case has been “distractor after distractor.” This is the foundation of her factual innocence. Regardless of how many times their theory changes he was not hit by a car and her car did not hit him.

Фото профиля RJ
RJ1 год назад

To me that’s obvious. It’s going to come down to the reconstruction. Aperture is known for being plaintiff oriented, flashy 3D animation, & imo lying. ARCCA is on another level in terms of who they hire and who they represent. More science less flash.I need Welcher to flop today.

Фото профиля Traci Hilliard
Traci Hilliard1 год назад

Facts and we are finally going to hear that from HIGHLY educated experts!!!

Похожие видео

Full Breakdown on this: "Key Cycle 1162-2" -Tech Stream data gathered from KRs Lexus shows a triggering event where the Lexus travels in reverse 62 Ft at 24.2 MPH. They claim this triggering event is when KR hits JOK. -Using tech stream data, along with data from the Lexus black box, Aperture (crash reconstruction experts) wrote a report. In the report they claim that based on information from the Lexus black box (the time Karen started her ignition) that the triggering event 1162-2 happened from 12:31:38-12:31:43. -This means that Aperture believes Karen Read struck JOK with her SUV sometime between 12:31:38-12:31:43. -On April 28th, Ian Whiffin testified for the CW. During his testimony he stated that JOKs phone data shows that from 12:31:56-12:32:16, JOK was interacting with his phone. He states that after 12:32:16, there is no more interactions between JOK & the phone. -When you compare the two reports, you see that 13 seconds AFTER Aperture claims JOK was struck (12:31:43), Whiffin claims JOK began interacting with his phone (12:31:56). -The medical examiner testified today that the blow to the back of JOKs head would have left him incapacitated. This means it would be IMPOSSIBLE for JOK to have been on his phone at 12:31:56 (Whiffin's report), based on the time of collision (12:31:43) from the crash reconstruction report (Aperture) -To remedy this massive problem for CW, Aperture decided to amend their report, in the middle of the trial. (May 8th) -They claim that the "clocks on JOKs iPhone and the Lexus are off" They state that JOKs iPhone "runs late" -AMAZINGLY, to remedy the issue between Whiffins testimony and their report, they decided "based on fixing the clock differences" that the NEW time that triggering event happened (the collision) was at 12:32:16. -THE EXACT TIME Whiffin stated JOKs iPhone stops recording apple health data and the last time the phone is interacted with. That is complete bullshit. -In the first trial, the time of collision based on THE EXACT SAME DATA, was said to be 12:45. Shockingly, after learning that Karen Read connected to JOKs wifi at 12:36 AM during the trial, the CW changed their time of the collision yet again, that time to 12:30. -Alessi already cross examined Ian Whiffin about this exact issue with the conflicting times between his report and Apertures. during this trial. On no planet should Bev allow this report to be amended and testified to. This is the bed they made and they have to lay in it. If she allows a change, the defense should immediately move for a mistrial. -When you're trying to make up a story, this is what happens. You make it up as you go and are constantly chasing your tail. This is corruption playing out for the world to see.

Joe TurtleHead

187,419 просмотров • 1 год назад