Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Jordan explains the importance of choosing a topic that matters. Writing is thinking; your thoughts define who you are. So why would you waste your time writing and thinking about something that doesn’t matter to you? Make every word matter at Sign up to Essay: Use promo code BLKFRIDAY24... show more

Essay

5,363 subscribers

153,369 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Arts Education Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Joe Rogan News1 year ago

If your words don’t reflect what truly matters to you, then what’s the point of speaking at all? Make every word count.

Corey Sutton1 year ago

Absolutely! Choosing a topic that resonates with you is crucial. Writing is a reflection of your thoughts and passions, so make every word count. Excited to check out Essay and take advantage of the Black Friday deal! 📝✨

Steve Mcbeth🇨🇦1 year ago

@jordanbpeterson Where was Mr Jordan when I went to school - every teacher should watch this clip & incorporate this theory - we would be better off & if the teachers don’t think so - get out of teaching!

Deb1 year ago

@jordanbpeterson I want to stop Sharia Law from becoming more prominent in the UK than it already is. This is my drive. Not necessarily for me (tick tock) but for the younger generations. This absolutely matters!

Pierre-Boris K.1 year ago

@jordanbpeterson Writing reveals our identity, and beyond.

Ashwini Kumar1 year ago

@jordanbpeterson Thanks for sharing

Ellie Dee1 year ago

@jordanbpeterson So many things matter....

THE Savage1 year ago

@jordanbpeterson

Ronny Bruknapp1 year ago

@jordanbpeterson You make a great point - our choice of topics reflects our inner thoughts and values. Writing forces us to crystallize our ideas.

Michael Henry1 year ago

As someone who respects you greatly and has been following you for a long time I have to ask an honest question. Just before you fell ill and during your illness, all your content was available on YouTube, and you expressed pride in having it accessible for free to everyone. I recall a video in which you stated that your penchant for indulgence and luxury is limited to savoring sparkling water and using stylish toothpicks. What advantages does Jordan Peterson Academy offer over utilizing a library or self-learning through YouTube for individuals looking to enhance their career?

Related Videos

Jordan Peterson explains the process for perfecting your essay. Elevate your writing and boost your grades this year at Use promo code BACK2SCHOOL to receive a 40% discount on monthly and yearly subscriptions. Sign up to Essay:

Jordan Peterson explains the process for perfecting your essay. Elevate your writing and boost your grades this year at Use promo code BACK2SCHOOL to receive a 40% discount on monthly and yearly subscriptions. Sign up to Essay:

Essay

199,125 views • 1 year ago

Essay is focused on providing a structured environment that helps you develop the skills to become a better communicator. Essay has unique tools that encourage productive writing habits, and make it easy to plan, test, and play with your writing. Try Essay for free:

Essay is focused on providing a structured environment that helps you develop the skills to become a better communicator. Essay has unique tools that encourage productive writing habits, and make it easy to plan, test, and play with your writing. Try Essay for free:

Essay

102,795 views • 1 year ago

The danger of AI is not just the slop, but what we lose in the process. Michael Pollan explains: "We're moving into this time where we're gonna sub out writing to AI. And AI can write our papers, and professors are dealing with this everywhere now. But what is lost is a way of thinking. Writing does something to your brain. It gives you access to things you can't know just walking around or thinking or planning or outlining. If you were just transcribing what was in your head, it would be kind of onerous. But it really is what you learn in the course of a day spent writing, things you didn't know, ideas that you didn't expect. And that's the thrill of it."

The danger of AI is not just the slop, but what we lose in the process. Michael Pollan explains: "We're moving into this time where we're gonna sub out writing to AI. And AI can write our papers, and professors are dealing with this everywhere now. But what is lost is a way of thinking. Writing does something to your brain. It gives you access to things you can't know just walking around or thinking or planning or outlining. If you were just transcribing what was in your head, it would be kind of onerous. But it really is what you learn in the course of a day spent writing, things you didn't know, ideas that you didn't expect. And that's the thrill of it."

David Perell Clips

18,468 views • 1 month ago

Sell in May and go away? Why would you? With our SUMMER PROMO we offer you the best reason to stay active, learn while trading with the team. Grab that big discount and enjoy a couple of free months with us. The earlier you sign up, the bigger your discount! (up to 50%)

Sell in May and go away? Why would you? With our SUMMER PROMO we offer you the best reason to stay active, learn while trading with the team. Grab that big discount and enjoy a couple of free months with us. The earlier you sign up, the bigger your discount! (up to 50%)

Ed_NL

193,782 views • 1 year ago

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

Patrick OShaughnessy

24,818 views • 6 months ago

Conor Neill: "If you can't write it clearly, the thinking was weak, not the writing" "To believe that something that feels clear in your head is thinking that's a very dangerous thing. When you try to put it down on a page, when you try to lay out your ideas in a structured order that someone else can digest, and you realize that you can't, I suggest the thinking was weak, not the writing." Neill explains his philosophy: "Writing is thinking. The process of taking a notepad, capturing thoughts, laying out the things that I'm thinking about, that is thinking. Sitting and staring out a window, maybe with a cigarette, whatever it is that you think is philosophizing that is not structured thinking. It's only when you're writing down and structuring, getting order into your thoughts on a page so that another person is able to get into the context, the perspective, the different things that you are pulling in to have your worldview." He shares a simple technique: "No matter what you are writing, whether it's an email, a Word document, when you've got a blank sheet of paper, start with the word 'This.' T-H-I-S. Starting with the word 'This' forces you to explain what the document is. It forces you to articulate to the reader what it is that they are holding. It forces you to describe why this document exists, what the objective is. And if you begin with the objective, it helps the reader, and it helps you articulate clearly why you are taking the time to write." Neill shares the most-read post on his blog: "The one post that has got far more views than any other is a post I wrote called 'Why Amazon Banned PowerPoint.' In Amazon, if a presenter wishes to ask people to agree to a budget, to agree to give them resources, they don't use PowerPoint. They write a six-page Word document that states why they are asking for the money and the resources." He explains Jeff Bezos's reasoning: "PowerPoint is easy for the presenter, but it's hard for the people who listen. Writing a six-page essay is hard for the presenter, but it's a lot easier for the people that get to read the document." And there's a second part to the Amazon method: "In the management meeting, the first 20 minutes is reading time. If you have gone to the effort to write six pages explaining your proposal, you deserve to see your work read. You deserve to sit there and see people reading through your work. People will not read before the meeting. The only way you get people to fully digest the six pages is by holding them there for 20 minutes, reading through, noting down their questions. No debate, no discussion until everyone in the room has read all six pages, has taken in the context, has time to think about what they would like to question. After 20 minutes of silent reading, they can have a discussion but an informed discussion." Neill shares a second insight about writing: "Divide writing from editing. Writing is producing words. Editing is improving words. These two processes — you cannot run at the same time." He explains his approach: "Most writers just vomit out a bad first draft. I personally have learned to produce 500 words in one straight blast. If something's wrong, if I need to check a fact, if I want to go back and fix something, I don't. I go 500 words of just getting it out onto the page. When I've got 500 words, then I'll stop and begin the process of editing." Neill shares what great writers understand: "All great writing is rewriting. It's editing. It's the crafting of taking a bad, crappy first draft and slowly iterating it, improving it 1% each time through. But if you haven't got that first draft, there's nothing to improve." He explains how separating these processes changed everything: "Learning to separate these two was one of the most powerful things to get rid of writer's block, to get rid of getting stuck, to get rid of procrastination. My mission when I sit down to write is: decide, am I writing or editing? If it's writing, get 500 bad words down on the page in the next 20 minutes. If it's editing, take the time to go through, improve sentences, change the order, change the structure. But these are two separate processes." Neill reveals the truth about good writing: "Some of my best articles started out as a bad blog post. Then I rewrote it as an article to give out to students. Then I rewrote it to share on another blog. Then I rewrote it to provide to a magazine. It's the sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth time of rewriting where it starts to be something that other people read and say, 'Wow, you're quite good at writing.' And the answer is I'm not good at writing. I vomit out a bad first draft and then go through this iterative process. One time, two times, three times, four times through slowly improving. But if you have no first draft, there's nothing to improve."

Conor Neill: "If you can't write it clearly, the thinking was weak, not the writing" "To believe that something that feels clear in your head is thinking that's a very dangerous thing. When you try to put it down on a page, when you try to lay out your ideas in a structured order that someone else can digest, and you realize that you can't, I suggest the thinking was weak, not the writing." Neill explains his philosophy: "Writing is thinking. The process of taking a notepad, capturing thoughts, laying out the things that I'm thinking about, that is thinking. Sitting and staring out a window, maybe with a cigarette, whatever it is that you think is philosophizing that is not structured thinking. It's only when you're writing down and structuring, getting order into your thoughts on a page so that another person is able to get into the context, the perspective, the different things that you are pulling in to have your worldview." He shares a simple technique: "No matter what you are writing, whether it's an email, a Word document, when you've got a blank sheet of paper, start with the word 'This.' T-H-I-S. Starting with the word 'This' forces you to explain what the document is. It forces you to articulate to the reader what it is that they are holding. It forces you to describe why this document exists, what the objective is. And if you begin with the objective, it helps the reader, and it helps you articulate clearly why you are taking the time to write." Neill shares the most-read post on his blog: "The one post that has got far more views than any other is a post I wrote called 'Why Amazon Banned PowerPoint.' In Amazon, if a presenter wishes to ask people to agree to a budget, to agree to give them resources, they don't use PowerPoint. They write a six-page Word document that states why they are asking for the money and the resources." He explains Jeff Bezos's reasoning: "PowerPoint is easy for the presenter, but it's hard for the people who listen. Writing a six-page essay is hard for the presenter, but it's a lot easier for the people that get to read the document." And there's a second part to the Amazon method: "In the management meeting, the first 20 minutes is reading time. If you have gone to the effort to write six pages explaining your proposal, you deserve to see your work read. You deserve to sit there and see people reading through your work. People will not read before the meeting. The only way you get people to fully digest the six pages is by holding them there for 20 minutes, reading through, noting down their questions. No debate, no discussion until everyone in the room has read all six pages, has taken in the context, has time to think about what they would like to question. After 20 minutes of silent reading, they can have a discussion but an informed discussion." Neill shares a second insight about writing: "Divide writing from editing. Writing is producing words. Editing is improving words. These two processes — you cannot run at the same time." He explains his approach: "Most writers just vomit out a bad first draft. I personally have learned to produce 500 words in one straight blast. If something's wrong, if I need to check a fact, if I want to go back and fix something, I don't. I go 500 words of just getting it out onto the page. When I've got 500 words, then I'll stop and begin the process of editing." Neill shares what great writers understand: "All great writing is rewriting. It's editing. It's the crafting of taking a bad, crappy first draft and slowly iterating it, improving it 1% each time through. But if you haven't got that first draft, there's nothing to improve." He explains how separating these processes changed everything: "Learning to separate these two was one of the most powerful things to get rid of writer's block, to get rid of getting stuck, to get rid of procrastination. My mission when I sit down to write is: decide, am I writing or editing? If it's writing, get 500 bad words down on the page in the next 20 minutes. If it's editing, take the time to go through, improve sentences, change the order, change the structure. But these are two separate processes." Neill reveals the truth about good writing: "Some of my best articles started out as a bad blog post. Then I rewrote it as an article to give out to students. Then I rewrote it to share on another blog. Then I rewrote it to provide to a magazine. It's the sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth time of rewriting where it starts to be something that other people read and say, 'Wow, you're quite good at writing.' And the answer is I'm not good at writing. I vomit out a bad first draft and then go through this iterative process. One time, two times, three times, four times through slowly improving. But if you have no first draft, there's nothing to improve."

Jaynit

18,165 views • 3 months ago

Don’t waste valuable time and energy fighting a battle that doesn’t matter. If that battle is not between you and your destiny, you’re not supposed to engage. Listen to this message from Joel, "Living Unoffended":

Don’t waste valuable time and energy fighting a battle that doesn’t matter. If that battle is not between you and your destiny, you’re not supposed to engage. Listen to this message from Joel, "Living Unoffended":

Joel Osteen

162,066 views • 2 years ago

In recognition of all that my friend, brother, and debating partner @mohammedhijabofficial did to promote my daughter Chana’s @_kosher_sex company in our Piers Morgan debate, we are offering a special promo code on for lubricants, vibrators, all the other sexual products that he repeatedly (and bizarrely) referenced in the debate. Simply use discount code “MoHijab” at Use the discount code now to buy all your intimacy needs. Thanks Mohammed for repeatedly plugging both the company and the products and we hope that they have been helpful and useful to you. We’re serious. And the promo code is real. #MoHijabKosherSex

Sensitive content

In recognition of all that my friend, brother, and debating partner @mohammedhijabofficial did to promote my daughter Chana’s @_kosher_sex company in our Piers Morgan debate, we are offering a special promo code on for lubricants, vibrators, all the other sexual products that he repeatedly (and bizarrely) referenced in the debate. Simply use discount code “MoHijab” at Use the discount code now to buy all your intimacy needs. Thanks Mohammed for repeatedly plugging both the company and the products and we hope that they have been helpful and useful to you. We’re serious. And the promo code is real. #MoHijabKosherSex

Rabbi Shmuley

1,527,641 views • 2 years ago

Watch this game-changing dissertation on "expert writing." Expert writers write to "think" about the world. 99% of experts write and think at the same time. They use the writing process to help themselves think. This is how they do their best thinking. Write to think about the world. Do this because you care, because you want to be part of progress, because you want to make a dent in the universe. Write to inspire and influence. And when you are finished writing, and you click publish, think about your work this way... the intent of your text is to cause readers to change the way they think about the world. Engagement metrics don't really matter in comparison. Whether or not your text is valuable, depends on whether or not your readers perceive that you have valuably changed what they think, or what they do, or how they decide. One of the reasons it's so hard for smart people to write well is because they don't write to change the way people think about the world. They write to complete a project, to earn a grade, to be assessed. Or they write to publish *their* thoughts without going through a mental and soulful exercise of writing to think about the world, without writing to change how people think about the world. Write to think about the world. Change how people think about the world. In an era of #GenerativeAI, content isn't the end game. Your goal isn't just to get someone's attention, generate reactions, or show up in search. Your mission is to change how people think about the world. Change How People Think About the World. Thank you, Larry McEnerney (now-retired former Director of the University of Chicago's Writing Program).

Watch this game-changing dissertation on "expert writing." Expert writers write to "think" about the world. 99% of experts write and think at the same time. They use the writing process to help themselves think. This is how they do their best thinking. Write to think about the world. Do this because you care, because you want to be part of progress, because you want to make a dent in the universe. Write to inspire and influence. And when you are finished writing, and you click publish, think about your work this way... the intent of your text is to cause readers to change the way they think about the world. Engagement metrics don't really matter in comparison. Whether or not your text is valuable, depends on whether or not your readers perceive that you have valuably changed what they think, or what they do, or how they decide. One of the reasons it's so hard for smart people to write well is because they don't write to change the way people think about the world. They write to complete a project, to earn a grade, to be assessed. Or they write to publish their thoughts without going through a mental and soulful exercise of writing to think about the world, without writing to change how people think about the world. Write to think about the world. Change how people think about the world. In an era of #GenerativeAI, content isn't the end game. Your goal isn't just to get someone's attention, generate reactions, or show up in search. Your mission is to change how people think about the world. Change How People Think About the World. Thank you, Larry McEnerney (now-retired former Director of the University of Chicago's Writing Program).

Brian Solis

113,698 views • 3 years ago

Elon Musk on learning physics: What matters are not the formulas, but the thinking process that led to the discovery of those formulas. “I just recommend studying physics. What matters is not remembering a bunch of formulas. What matters is the thinking process that led to the discovery of those formulas. It's sort of critical thinking, first principles analysis, trying to understand what is true at a most fundamental level and then reasoning up from there and testing your conclusions against the most fundamental truths in any given arena. This is how you can figure out whether something is more likely to be true or not. It's good to think in terms of probabilities. If you receive information about a subject, that should change the probability of your conclusion, but not the certainty of your conclusion. Physics teaches you that you should not be 100% certain about any given prediction. Now, there's some things that are highly likely, but physics teaches you you got to assign a probability to something being true. And then as you learn more information, your original conclusion may be wrong, then you should then change your mind based on the new information.” Town Hall in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, October 24, 2024

Elon Musk on learning physics: What matters are not the formulas, but the thinking process that led to the discovery of those formulas. “I just recommend studying physics. What matters is not remembering a bunch of formulas. What matters is the thinking process that led to the discovery of those formulas. It's sort of critical thinking, first principles analysis, trying to understand what is true at a most fundamental level and then reasoning up from there and testing your conclusions against the most fundamental truths in any given arena. This is how you can figure out whether something is more likely to be true or not. It's good to think in terms of probabilities. If you receive information about a subject, that should change the probability of your conclusion, but not the certainty of your conclusion. Physics teaches you that you should not be 100% certain about any given prediction. Now, there's some things that are highly likely, but physics teaches you you got to assign a probability to something being true. And then as you learn more information, your original conclusion may be wrong, then you should then change your mind based on the new information.” Town Hall in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, October 24, 2024

ELON CLIPS

67,501 views • 6 months ago

You are not going to get something for nothing. You have to pay the price that baseball demands and that price is everything. This game is about the courage to act on your own thoughts and become who you want to become

You are not going to get something for nothing. You have to pay the price that baseball demands and that price is everything. This game is about the courage to act on your own thoughts and become who you want to become

Matt Lisle

28,706 views • 4 months ago

I wrote some code! It renders frames to a virtual canvas and then distributes packets over WiFi to ESP32 modules that receive them to make up a larger display. So you could make a jumbotron out of a bunch of ESP32s and one PC. Code can be found on Github, and would love to get your suggestions on it!

I wrote some code! It renders frames to a virtual canvas and then distributes packets over WiFi to ESP32 modules that receive them to make up a larger display. So you could make a jumbotron out of a bunch of ESP32s and one PC. Code can be found on Github, and would love to get your suggestions on it!

Dave W Plummer

34,156 views • 1 year ago

Nobody is writing 90% of their code using AI. Here's the uncomfortable truth: The real productivity gain from using AI to write code is closer to 10%, nowhere near the 90% people claim. Sundar Pichai said in 2024 that 30% of the new code at Google was AI-generated. However, he went on to admit, during Lex Friedman's podcast, that engineering velocity had only increased by about 10%. AI-generated code isn't free code. It still has to be reviewed, tested, and made production-ready. Optimizing a single step (code generation) doesn't boost output if bottlenecks shift elsewhere (code reviews). It doesn't matter how much code you generate if you can't keep up the review process. The solution: Automate as much as you can the review and verification of your code. I'm working with Sonar, who is sponsoring this post, and they will take care of the code quality and security analysis of your code: • They review over 300B lines of code every single day • They cover reliability, security, and maintainability for your code • You can integrate them into your CI/CD pipeline • You can install them in your IDE (I use their VSCode extension) • Support for more than 30 languages Here is a link so you can check them out:

Nobody is writing 90% of their code using AI. Here's the uncomfortable truth: The real productivity gain from using AI to write code is closer to 10%, nowhere near the 90% people claim. Sundar Pichai said in 2024 that 30% of the new code at Google was AI-generated. However, he went on to admit, during Lex Friedman's podcast, that engineering velocity had only increased by about 10%. AI-generated code isn't free code. It still has to be reviewed, tested, and made production-ready. Optimizing a single step (code generation) doesn't boost output if bottlenecks shift elsewhere (code reviews). It doesn't matter how much code you generate if you can't keep up the review process. The solution: Automate as much as you can the review and verification of your code. I'm working with Sonar, who is sponsoring this post, and they will take care of the code quality and security analysis of your code: • They review over 300B lines of code every single day • They cover reliability, security, and maintainability for your code • You can integrate them into your CI/CD pipeline • You can install them in your IDE (I use their VSCode extension) • Support for more than 30 languages Here is a link so you can check them out:

Santiago

296,570 views • 10 months ago

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."

The Pragmatic Engineer

39,011 views • 2 months ago

Grok Build tip of the day: check your work! Just like you would check your work after writing code, use /check-work to have a subagent check on Grok’s code. It will look at the repo, trace alternative code paths, and fix bugs before reporting back to Grok what it found.

Grok Build tip of the day: check your work! Just like you would check your work after writing code, use /check-work to have a subagent check on Grok’s code. It will look at the repo, trace alternative code paths, and fix bugs before reporting back to Grok what it found.

akshey

15,622 views • 2 months ago

Alex Tabarrok on the problem with every technology that remembers for us: "Every time you screenshot something instead of thinking, every time you share instead of reflecting, you are training yourself to be a little more hollow. You don't remember things anymore. You just know where to find them." This was Socrates on writing, only slightly paraphrased.

Alex Tabarrok on the problem with every technology that remembers for us: "Every time you screenshot something instead of thinking, every time you share instead of reflecting, you are training yourself to be a little more hollow. You don't remember things anymore. You just know where to find them." This was Socrates on writing, only slightly paraphrased.

vitrupo

22,886 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: We're launching an AI writing partner infused with our taste Every 📧. Spiral will help you write great short-form content in your style that sounds like you—not a model. We’ve loaded it with everything we know about writing—writing that feels alive and honest, and that spreads—and put it at your fingertips. Spiral v3 is a multi-agent system that takes you from idea to post in a few simple steps: 1. Collaborative interviews. When you ask Spiral to write a piece of content, it won’t start writing immediately. Instead, it will chat with you to figure out what you’re really trying to say and what’s most interesting to you. 2. Many drafts at once. Once Spiral begins to draft, it will write three different versions that you can see and interact with simultaneously. You can explore the space of possibilities and mix and match between different drafts easily. 3. Principled and taste-driven. We’ve spent hundreds of hours baking everything we know about writing into Spiral’s thought -process. It has a library of principles that it draws from—like always using the active voice, and always putting the most interesting idea in the hook—that make Spiral feel like a great ghostwriter, not an AI. 4. Collaborative and team-ready. Spiral has Workspaces that allow you to share product and company information and styles between members of your team—so all of your writing is on brand, all the time. You can buy Spiral standalone or if you're an Every 📧 subscriber you get it for free as part of your subscription along with access to all of our writing, our live AI-coding workshops like Claude Code Camp, Cora, Monologue, Sparkle, and our subscriber-only Discord. Try Spiral v3 now:

Dan Shipper 📧

82,903 views • 9 months ago

Logan Paul explains why finding your purpose matters more than working hard “Celebrities, influencers, and all these motivational speakers tell you that you can do whatever you put your mind to. We are all equal. I’m gonna be honest, that’s not true. I’ve tried to do things and worked really hard. I will immerse myself in a project or an endeavor, go all in, and I found that no matter how all in you go, sometimes it just doesn’t work” “‘Work hard and you’ll win no matter what’ doesn’t always apply. What I think can apply is finding what makes you tick. Find the thing that makes you want to get out of bed every morning, even if it’s something that you wouldn’t consider for one second to be a viable business opportunity. Because if you do what you love every day, you won’t need to work a day in your life”

Logan Paul explains why finding your purpose matters more than working hard “Celebrities, influencers, and all these motivational speakers tell you that you can do whatever you put your mind to. We are all equal. I’m gonna be honest, that’s not true. I’ve tried to do things and worked really hard. I will immerse myself in a project or an endeavor, go all in, and I found that no matter how all in you go, sometimes it just doesn’t work” “‘Work hard and you’ll win no matter what’ doesn’t always apply. What I think can apply is finding what makes you tick. Find the thing that makes you want to get out of bed every morning, even if it’s something that you wouldn’t consider for one second to be a viable business opportunity. Because if you do what you love every day, you won’t need to work a day in your life”

Mikli

171,644 views • 5 months ago

Software development will never be the same. I want you to watch this video: This is a spec-driven development environment. 100% of your time goes to writing specs and managing agents. 0% goes to writing the code.

Software development will never be the same. I want you to watch this video: This is a spec-driven development environment. 100% of your time goes to writing specs and managing agents. 0% goes to writing the code.

Santiago

120,161 views • 7 months ago