正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Jordan Peterson drops a mind-bender: Atheism kills science itself. "With the death of God, many other things die... one of the things that dies when God dies is science—and no one expected that." Why? Science isn't neutral—it's built on unprovable religious-like axioms: - Truth exists - Truth is understandable...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

462,813 subscribers

437,361 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Jordan Peterson made a profound point on Chris Williamson’s podcast. When God dies, a lot of unexpected things die with Him, including science. Science isn’t some purely neutral, secular tool. It rests on deeply religious assumptions: that truth exists, that it’s knowable, that pursuing it is good, and that the universe makes sense. These aren’t scientific claims, they’re metaphysical, rooted in a religious worldview. The universities themselves grew out of monasteries. Without that deeper foundation, science eventually stops being about truth and becomes just another tool for power, ideology, or convenience. You lose the reason to be honest when the data gets inconvenient. Do you think science can survive long-term without any belief in objective truth or a higher moral order?
2:07

Jordan Peterson made a profound point on Chris Williamson’s podcast. When God dies, a lot of unexpected things die with Him, including science. Science isn’t some purely neutral, secular tool. It rests on deeply religious assumptions: that truth exists, that it’s knowable, that pursuing it is good, and that the universe makes sense. These aren’t scientific claims, they’re metaphysical, rooted in a religious worldview. The universities themselves grew out of monasteries. Without that deeper foundation, science eventually stops being about truth and becomes just another tool for power, ideology, or convenience. You lose the reason to be honest when the data gets inconvenient. Do you think science can survive long-term without any belief in objective truth or a higher moral order?

Camus

270,459 次观看 • 3 个月前

Nobel laureate, Sir Peter Medawar, pointed out that the idea that science is the only way to truth is unworthy of science itself. Science deals with the 'what' and the 'how' but it is easy to see science cannot deal with the 'why' of purpose. Pt 3/7: Do science and faith mix?
0:38

Nobel laureate, Sir Peter Medawar, pointed out that the idea that science is the only way to truth is unworthy of science itself. Science deals with the 'what' and the 'how' but it is easy to see science cannot deal with the 'why' of purpose. Pt 3/7: Do science and faith mix?

Prof John Lennox

22,657 次观看 • 1 年前

Oxford professor John Lennox in an interview with Jordan Peterson in 2023 explained his view that there is no conflict between science and Christianity: "I never saw the tension between Christianity and science because very early on as a teenager I was introduced to the writings of a scientist who was a Christian who drew my attention to something Alfred North Whitehead wrote, and it was really put in much simpler language by C.S. Lewis when he wrote 'Men became scientific because they expected law in nature, and they expected law in nature because they believed in a Lawgiver.' And so, very early on, and I was fascinated by the idea, that actually modern science is a legacy of the biblical worldview, and therefore, it's no accident that the pioneers—Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Maxwell, and so on—were believers in God. And as you pointed out, it underpins the tradition that lies behind the great universities of the world that the doctrine of Creation was actually the belief, the underlying presupposition, that allowed people to do science. So I've come over my life to the conclusion that science and the biblical worldview sit very comfortably together, but it's science and atheism that do not sit comfortably together."
1:24

Oxford professor John Lennox in an interview with Jordan Peterson in 2023 explained his view that there is no conflict between science and Christianity: "I never saw the tension between Christianity and science because very early on as a teenager I was introduced to the writings of a scientist who was a Christian who drew my attention to something Alfred North Whitehead wrote, and it was really put in much simpler language by C.S. Lewis when he wrote 'Men became scientific because they expected law in nature, and they expected law in nature because they believed in a Lawgiver.' And so, very early on, and I was fascinated by the idea, that actually modern science is a legacy of the biblical worldview, and therefore, it's no accident that the pioneers—Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Maxwell, and so on—were believers in God. And as you pointed out, it underpins the tradition that lies behind the great universities of the world that the doctrine of Creation was actually the belief, the underlying presupposition, that allowed people to do science. So I've come over my life to the conclusion that science and the biblical worldview sit very comfortably together, but it's science and atheism that do not sit comfortably together."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

137,411 次观看 • 6 个月前

Two elite MIT professors—Daniel Hastings (Aeronautics & Astronautics) and Troy Van Voorhis (Chemistry)—share how cutting-edge science deepens their faith in God. Hastings: "There is a God who created the universe... a loving God who seeks a relationship with us and gives us free will to choose him or not. Our purpose is found in being in relationship with him." Van Voorhis: "The order and structure of natural laws suggests a God who ordained them. The astonishing complexity of living things suggests an architect who cares... Studying the natural sciences lets me learn a little about what God has done—and come to understand a little of what He is like: much bigger, grander, more awesome and majestic than I imagined." In the heart of one of the world's top scientific institutions, faith and discovery aren't at war—they fuel each other. Science revealing God, or God revealing science? What resonates most with you?
0:48

Two elite MIT professors—Daniel Hastings (Aeronautics & Astronautics) and Troy Van Voorhis (Chemistry)—share how cutting-edge science deepens their faith in God. Hastings: "There is a God who created the universe... a loving God who seeks a relationship with us and gives us free will to choose him or not. Our purpose is found in being in relationship with him." Van Voorhis: "The order and structure of natural laws suggests a God who ordained them. The astonishing complexity of living things suggests an architect who cares... Studying the natural sciences lets me learn a little about what God has done—and come to understand a little of what He is like: much bigger, grander, more awesome and majestic than I imagined." In the heart of one of the world's top scientific institutions, faith and discovery aren't at war—they fuel each other. Science revealing God, or God revealing science? What resonates most with you?

Camus

71,908 次观看 • 6 个月前

In a world and industry full of TERRIBLE people, Chris Pratt is one of the good ones. I applaud this man's love for God and his faith. "God is real!" "God Loves you!" "God wants the best for you. Believe that because I do." "Learn to pray! It is so good for your soul." We need more Chris Pratt's in this world!
0:51

In a world and industry full of TERRIBLE people, Chris Pratt is one of the good ones. I applaud this man's love for God and his faith. "God is real!" "God Loves you!" "God wants the best for you. Believe that because I do." "Learn to pray! It is so good for your soul." We need more Chris Pratt's in this world!

AmericanPapaBear™

364,427 次观看 • 9 个月前

Dr. Ruxandra Teslo argues America's biotech problem isn't the science, it's how slowly we learn from humans: "This is going to be more and more of a bottleneck as science advances especially in oncology. It's not just that we don't have enough clinical trials and they are expensive. This has become worse and worse throughout the years." "The article is particularly focused on these phase one clinical trials. These are the trials where you first take a new drug into humans for the first time. The reason we're focusing on those, they are some of the most important trials because that's where you can actually start to learn and do iterative loops of learning in humans." "What you learn from that goes back into the science and you can engineer something better. We can see from China, they're very very good doing their phase one trials fast, that is very much responsible for propelling them ahead, almost ahead of the US in just a decade, despite the fact that their science is not as good." "We have a very good model for how to do them faster and better, which is Australia." Ruxandra Teslo 🧬 Adam Kroetsch IFP
2:32

Dr. Ruxandra Teslo argues America's biotech problem isn't the science, it's how slowly we learn from humans: "This is going to be more and more of a bottleneck as science advances especially in oncology. It's not just that we don't have enough clinical trials and they are expensive. This has become worse and worse throughout the years." "The article is particularly focused on these phase one clinical trials. These are the trials where you first take a new drug into humans for the first time. The reason we're focusing on those, they are some of the most important trials because that's where you can actually start to learn and do iterative loops of learning in humans." "What you learn from that goes back into the science and you can engineer something better. We can see from China, they're very very good doing their phase one trials fast, that is very much responsible for propelling them ahead, almost ahead of the US in just a decade, despite the fact that their science is not as good." "We have a very good model for how to do them faster and better, which is Australia." Ruxandra Teslo 🧬 Adam Kroetsch IFP

MTS

16,475 次观看 • 14 天前

HISTORIC: President Trump just signed an executive order to codify gold-standard science into U.S. government policy This is a massive win for the MAHA movement—and a crushing blow to Fauci-era mandates and the climate alarmist junk science that’s shaped national policy for decades. From the Oval Office, White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf read the order aloud: “This executive order is entitled ‘Restoring Gold-Standard Science.’” “One of the issues we’ve had in recent decades is that government policy has been made on the back of junk science—scientific studies and findings that included conflicts of interest or scientific misconduct.” The order does one thing clearly: put truth back at the center of policymaking. “The purpose of this executive order is to re-center policymaking around gold-standard science—scientific efforts that follow appropriate methods and don’t include conflicts of interest.” And it forces transparency across the board: “To ensure that when departments and agencies rely on scientific studies, to promulgate rules, to promulgate regulations, that the science that they’re relying on is highly reliable and available to the public.” The days of captured science are over.
1:08

HISTORIC: President Trump just signed an executive order to codify gold-standard science into U.S. government policy This is a massive win for the MAHA movement—and a crushing blow to Fauci-era mandates and the climate alarmist junk science that’s shaped national policy for decades. From the Oval Office, White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf read the order aloud: “This executive order is entitled ‘Restoring Gold-Standard Science.’” “One of the issues we’ve had in recent decades is that government policy has been made on the back of junk science—scientific studies and findings that included conflicts of interest or scientific misconduct.” The order does one thing clearly: put truth back at the center of policymaking. “The purpose of this executive order is to re-center policymaking around gold-standard science—scientific efforts that follow appropriate methods and don’t include conflicts of interest.” And it forces transparency across the board: “To ensure that when departments and agencies rely on scientific studies, to promulgate rules, to promulgate regulations, that the science that they’re relying on is highly reliable and available to the public.” The days of captured science are over.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

315,474 次观看 • 1 年前

Faith is not wishful thinking. Faith is confidence rooted in evidence. Hebrews 11 reminds us that faith is "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." When we look at the Word of God, we find page after page of evidence that God answers prayer, heals the broken, comforts the hurting, and provides for His people. The same God who delivered generations before us has not changed. His promises remain true, and His power remains available to those who believe. In moments of uncertainty, our faith is strengthened when we remember what God has already done. No matter what challenges surround us, our future is in the hands of God. Those hands have carried His people through every trial and every season of adversity. There is hope for tomorrow, healing for today, and a breakthrough for those who trust Him. Faith is not merely believing that God can act - it is believing that God will act. As you face today's challenges, stand firmly on the promises of God's Word. Reach out in faith, believe His promises, and give Him the opportunity to prove once again that He is the Almighty God.
5:21

Faith is not wishful thinking. Faith is confidence rooted in evidence. Hebrews 11 reminds us that faith is "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." When we look at the Word of God, we find page after page of evidence that God answers prayer, heals the broken, comforts the hurting, and provides for His people. The same God who delivered generations before us has not changed. His promises remain true, and His power remains available to those who believe. In moments of uncertainty, our faith is strengthened when we remember what God has already done. No matter what challenges surround us, our future is in the hands of God. Those hands have carried His people through every trial and every season of adversity. There is hope for tomorrow, healing for today, and a breakthrough for those who trust Him. Faith is not merely believing that God can act - it is believing that God will act. As you face today's challenges, stand firmly on the promises of God's Word. Reach out in faith, believe His promises, and give Him the opportunity to prove once again that He is the Almighty God.

Pastor John Hagee

10,326 次观看 • 3 个月前

ALLIE B. STUCKEY: “Now who determines truth? Who arbitrates righteousness versus wrongdoing? Only the God who created truth and authored morality… That is God and the only One who can say what love is, what truth is, because He says what's right and what's wrong. What's good and what's bad, what's true and what's not. When life begins, what a woman is, what a marriage is and what it's not.” TPUSA Faith Allie Beth Stuckey #BelieversSummit
2:30

ALLIE B. STUCKEY: “Now who determines truth? Who arbitrates righteousness versus wrongdoing? Only the God who created truth and authored morality… That is God and the only One who can say what love is, what truth is, because He says what's right and what's wrong. What's good and what's bad, what's true and what's not. When life begins, what a woman is, what a marriage is and what it's not.” TPUSA Faith Allie Beth Stuckey #BelieversSummit

Charlie Kirk

174,286 次观看 • 2 年前

My faith in Christ is evidence based. Faith is also essential in science. Einstein said he couldn't imagine a genuine scientist without faith -- for scientists must believe science can be done and believe that the human mind is capable of understanding nature (at least in part).
0:47

My faith in Christ is evidence based. Faith is also essential in science. Einstein said he couldn't imagine a genuine scientist without faith -- for scientists must believe science can be done and believe that the human mind is capable of understanding nature (at least in part).

Prof John Lennox

51,709 次观看 • 1 年前

One of the key takeaways in Science: A New Golden Age is meta-science — the science of science itself. We need to rigorously evaluate how we fund and conduct research, run real experiments on mechanisms like fast-track grants, measure what actually works, and course-correct when it doesn’t. Government has rarely done this. That’s changing: we’re standing up meta-science units at places like NIH and NSF so continuous improvement becomes the default.
0:42

One of the key takeaways in Science: A New Golden Age is meta-science — the science of science itself. We need to rigorously evaluate how we fund and conduct research, run real experiments on mechanisms like fast-track grants, measure what actually works, and course-correct when it doesn’t. Government has rarely done this. That’s changing: we’re standing up meta-science units at places like NIH and NSF so continuous improvement becomes the default.

White House OSTP 47

30,553 次观看 • 1 个月前

Back in 2023, University of Chicago professor Dorian Abbot warned that the corruption of science by woke activist confirmation bias was already underway. DEI statements were functioning as ideological litmus tests. Faculty openly admitted they would discriminate against conservatives in hiring. Heterodox thinkers were being disinvited from seminars, denied tenure, and frozen out of collaborations. The result? Ideology was beginning to override evidence. He described a seminar on “decolonial feminist science” where the scientific method is only accepted if it agrees with feminist or decolonial theory — otherwise, the method itself is rejected. When politics replaces truth-seeking, science dies. This should alarm anyone who cares about real discovery. What’s one example you’ve seen of ideology interfering with science or academia?
2:03

Back in 2023, University of Chicago professor Dorian Abbot warned that the corruption of science by woke activist confirmation bias was already underway. DEI statements were functioning as ideological litmus tests. Faculty openly admitted they would discriminate against conservatives in hiring. Heterodox thinkers were being disinvited from seminars, denied tenure, and frozen out of collaborations. The result? Ideology was beginning to override evidence. He described a seminar on “decolonial feminist science” where the scientific method is only accepted if it agrees with feminist or decolonial theory — otherwise, the method itself is rejected. When politics replaces truth-seeking, science dies. This should alarm anyone who cares about real discovery. What’s one example you’ve seen of ideology interfering with science or academia?

Camus

118,309 次观看 • 5 个月前

November 5, 2021 CDC Director Walensky said that masks reduce the risk of COVID infection by 80%. This was not supportable under any conceivable interpretation of the evidence. Yet the scientific and medical communities supported this and many other lies. They have never apologized or taken responsibility. Today they claim science is "under attack". But how can the scientific community tell the public to "believe in science", when the scientific community has itself shown that it does not believe in science?
0:37

November 5, 2021 CDC Director Walensky said that masks reduce the risk of COVID infection by 80%. This was not supportable under any conceivable interpretation of the evidence. Yet the scientific and medical communities supported this and many other lies. They have never apologized or taken responsibility. Today they claim science is "under attack". But how can the scientific community tell the public to "believe in science", when the scientific community has itself shown that it does not believe in science?

Kevin Bass

34,973 次观看 • 1 年前

"There is a very significant gap between what climate science actually says and what you've been told it says." Steve Koonin spent 50 years in science at Caltech, BP, and the US Department of Energy. He argues that a generation has been taught to fear the future when the scientific evidence paints a more nuanced picture. Watch the full ARC 2026 speech
14:27

"There is a very significant gap between what climate science actually says and what you've been told it says." Steve Koonin spent 50 years in science at Caltech, BP, and the US Department of Energy. He argues that a generation has been taught to fear the future when the scientific evidence paints a more nuanced picture. Watch the full ARC 2026 speech

The Alliance for Responsible Citizenship

18,588 次观看 • 2 个月前

Today marks the beginning of what some call Pride Month. For Christians, we celebrate today like we do every day - that this is the day the Lord has made, so let us rejoice and be glad in it. When we see the acronym LGBTQ, we don’t see sexual identities to celebrate, we see image-bearers of God who are doing what’s right in their own eyes and need the kind of love that points to Jesus and His truth. The truth is God made us male and female so that a man can leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh. God IS love and He has the authority to define it. He calls homosexuality a sin, and holy marriage between a man and woman very good. The most loving thing we can do is agree with God. We can’t love others by affirming sin. This is my response to why we don’t celebrate Pride Month:
7:35

Today marks the beginning of what some call Pride Month. For Christians, we celebrate today like we do every day - that this is the day the Lord has made, so let us rejoice and be glad in it. When we see the acronym LGBTQ, we don’t see sexual identities to celebrate, we see image-bearers of God who are doing what’s right in their own eyes and need the kind of love that points to Jesus and His truth. The truth is God made us male and female so that a man can leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh. God IS love and He has the authority to define it. He calls homosexuality a sin, and holy marriage between a man and woman very good. The most loving thing we can do is agree with God. We can’t love others by affirming sin. This is my response to why we don’t celebrate Pride Month:

Allie Beth Stuckey

125,780 次观看 • 3 个月前