Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Journalist Whitney Webb reveals how U.S. intelligence agencies maintain close ties with leading tech companies—including Google, Palantir and Oracle—turning regular people into easy targets for digital surveillance and blackmail. According to Webb, many of these tech giants were born in the shadows of CIA projects, transforming government surveillance technologies...

51,112 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Whitney Webb just exposed the truth about Palantir’s origins. It was created to privatize mass surveillance. “Don’t tell me this is a conspiracy theory.” “Alex Karp admitted that the CIA was always the intended client of Palantir.” Webb and Mark Goodwin just broke down the truth about Palantir’s origins: After 9/11, DARPA launched the Information Awareness Office to develop a government mass surveillance apparatus. Reagan-era National Security Advisor John Poindexter led the new IAO. After massive public scrutiny and backlash, Congress defunded it. But the program never really shut down. It was moved into the private sector with the help of Peter Thiel and Alex Karp. Webb: “Peter Thiel comes, fresh off of selling PayPal … he’s got all this money, and he’s like: I’m gonna make this company called Palantir.” “Palantir … had really started off as the anti-fraud algorithm at PayPal.” “When PayPal was being created, Max Levchin sort of gave it away.” Goodwin revealed that Max Levchin essentially admitted in an interview at the time: “When I was developing all the anti-fraud stuff at PayPal, I was working with every three and four letter agency that I could.” “Meaning the CIA, and the DOD, and DARPA.” “They form PayPal in the late ‘90s.” “They make a bunch of money, and it’s Thiel and Levchin, admittedly working with the CIA and NSA, while developing this anti-fraud stuff.” “He takes that anti-fraud algorithm, which was built with the CIA in the private sector, and then rebrands it as Palantir.” Webb: “As they’re setting it up, they go through Richard Perle, who was involved with the Bush-era Department of Defense, and I believe the Office of Special Plans.” “He’s approached by Peter Thiel and Alex Karp.” “They’re basically like: we want to talk to John Poindexter, because what he was trying to do is what we want to do.” “They go and meet with Poindexter, who becomes named basically the godfather of modern surveillance because of this.” “He advises them on how to create Palantir.” “And then Palantir gets in bed pretty much right away with the CIA.” “They were their first and only client for their first six years.” Whitney Webb markgoodw.in

Holden Culotta

44,907 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Whitney Webb Exposes Big Tech's Sinister Roots and Urges a Mass Boycott for Freedom! In a searing critique of the tech giants dominating our lives, investigative journalist Whitney Webb lays bare the disturbing origins of Silicon Valley’s most powerful players. She warns that many of these companies—helmed by CEOs with ties to controversial figures like Jeffrey Epstein or other questionable associations—were birthed with funding from the CIA, DARPA, or similar entities. This chilling connection to intelligence agencies and murky networks reveals a deeper agenda, one that threatens the autonomy of every individual who relies on their services. Webb’s message is clear: dependence on Big Tech is a trap. “If we’re dependent on them, they can do whatever they want to us,” she declares, likening such reliance to modern-day enslavement. Her call to action is urgent and uncompromising—boycott these tech behemoths as much as possible. Break free from their grip by minimizing the use of their platforms and services. True independence, she argues, demands personal responsibility and deliberate effort to disentangle ourselves from systems designed to control. Webb also dismantles the illusion that political saviors will rescue us. She cautions against the naive hope that voting for the “right” candidate or party will dismantle the entrenched power of an 80-year nexus of intelligence agencies and organized crime. “If I vote for this politician, I don’t have to do anything to ensure my independence from the system,” she says, mimicking the mindset that keeps people complacent. This false comfort, she warns, only deepens our servitude to a handful of corporations poised to dominate an increasingly digital future. As we hurtle toward a world where a tiny cadre of tech giants controls nearly every facet of life, Webb’s words are a rallying cry. Freedom isn’t handed to us—it’s claimed through action. Each individual must take steps to reject dependency, reclaim sovereignty, and resist the creeping tyranny of Big Tech. The stakes couldn’t be higher: remain tethered to these systems, and we risk becoming pawns in a game rigged by the powerful. Break free, and we preserve the chance to live as truly independent people.

Camus

23,605 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

WHITNEY WEBB on the military now "realizing [its] initial dream for the internet" "LifeLog [has become] Facebook" "Total Information Awareness [has become] Palantir" "we're coming... close to the end game" "A lot of these 'Big Tech'... companies are just masquerading... [they] were created by military intelligence" "I think it's important to keep in mind too that even going beyond Palantir, the Internet itself was created by the military" "And... now we're coming kind of close to the end game in terms of full circle of them kind of realizing their initial dream for the Internet" This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from a discussion with Ryan Cristian, Hrvoje Morić, et al. posted to the Corbett Report YouTube channel on May 29, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "I mean, I remember stories 10 years ago about massive NSA data centers in like Utah and various states before people were even talking about data centers, about all the information they've been compiling on people. "And I think it's important to keep in mind too that even going beyond Palantir, the Internet itself was created by the military. And I think now we're coming kind of close to the end game in terms of full circle of them kind of realizing their initial dream for the Internet. "And then, you know, in the case of Palantir, you know, I argue, and a lot of my research points to various efforts within the DARPA military sphere aimed at the Internet being privatized. For example, LifeLog becoming Facebook, Total Information Awareness becoming Palantir. You know, these have become reality. "A lot of these big, 'Big Tech' Silicon Valley companies are just masquerading as we just started in our garage. And we're regular guys. Like, no, these are guys that were created by military intelligence and they privatized these programs and we have willingly given them our data and we continue to do so. "And so even if you have Palantir having access to privileged information, think about something in that same family of company, like Clearview AI, for example, which is also Peter Thiel–connected, that has amassed this huge database used for facial recognition by law enforcement and militaries. So, you know, to arrest and also to murder people. "And they just scraped most of that from stuff, pictures people freely and willingly posted. We voluntarily gave a lot of our data away, and they've been able to scrape a lot more of it than you, than you probably think."

Sense Receptor

85,157 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Whitney Webb exposes the chilling truth behind digital IDs, CBDCs, and the emerging global financial system—a surveillance state disguised as "inclusion." Webb warns that digital IDs are the backbone of unprecedented control, fusing data on travel, health, career, education, and telecom into AI-driven micromanagement. Paired with CBDCs, they form a system where every transaction is tracked, and non-compliance means exclusion. UN and BIS documents reveal years of planning, framing digital IDs as essential for "financial inclusion" and "banking the unbanked." But Webb argues this is a bait-and-switch—marketed as empowering, it’s inherently exclusionary. Without a digital ID, you’re erased from the economy. Webb cites Mark Carney’s "new Bretton Woods" vision, a post-crisis financial governance system. She suggests a orchestrated global event—akin to WWII—could trigger its rollout, with the debt bubble’s collapse as the catalyst. “All wars are bankers’ wars,” she notes, pointing to historical precedent. The debt bubble’s explosion is key. Webb explains that inflating debt maximizes the crisis, forcing masses into a tokenized ledger system. “Sign up, give your biometrics, and we’ll service your debt,” she mimics, highlighting the coercive onboarding to a surveillance-driven economy. Webb spotlights Larry Fink’s BlackRock, eyeing natural assets to fuel their business model. The Intrinsic Exchange Group, backed by the Rockefeller Foundation, aims to financialize nature—forests, rivers, life itself—into tradable assets, dwarfing current markets sixfold. This “nature’s economy” is a Wall Street power grab, Webb argues, turning the natural world into blockchain-tracked products. BlackRock’s AI, Aladdin, could manage risks in real-time, cementing control. Fink’s infrastructure bets, like acquiring GIP, align with a “green” decarbonization push. Webb reveals the Natural Asset Corporation model: identify a forest or lake, issue shares, sell to wealth funds, and profit—all for free. “It’s producing money out of thin air,” she says, framed as saving the planet but really saving the debt racket. The global carbon market and infrastructure overhaul are part of this shift, with BlackRock positioning itself as a key player. Webb warns that without awareness, this system could dominate unchallenged, reshaping economies and nature itself. Whitney Webb urges vigilance: the fusion of digital IDs, CBDCs, and natural asset financialization is a deliberate move toward total control. Will we wake up before the crisis hits? Share this thread to spark discussion.

Camus

54,084 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Whitney Webb, an investigative journalist renowned for exposing the underbelly of power, has sounded a clarion call for a public reckoning on the unchecked fusion of Silicon Valley and the national security state. In a recent interview, she highlighted the growing entanglement of tech giants and government agencies, a partnership that threatens to erode civil liberties under the guise of innovation. Far from being a Luddite, Webb insists that the issue isn’t technology itself but the lack of transparency, accountability, and public debate surrounding its deployment—particularly when AI algorithms, hyped as infallible, are outsourced to make critical decisions impacting lives and freedoms. Webb points to a chilling example from the COVID-19 era in Rhode Island, where then-Governor Gina Raimondo greenlit a partnership with Diagnostic Robotics, an Israeli company tasked with using state health data to predict COVID-19 outbreaks. The goal? To identify “hot spots” and trigger localized lockdowns, restricting commerce and freedom of movement. Yet, as Webb uncovered, the algorithm’s accuracy—touted by the company at roughly 70-80%—was never independently vetted. “What if it’s closer to 60% or 50%?” she asks. “That’s no better than a coin toss, yet we’re handing over immense power to these systems, with real consequences for people’s lives.” This case raises profound questions about the reliability of AI and the motives behind its adoption. Webb notes that Diagnostic Robotics’ use of health data, even if “anonymized,” likely skirted HIPAA protections under emergency COVID-19 justifications. The opacity of these decisions—coupled with the company’s ties to broader tech and security networks—underscores a dangerous trend: private-sector AI, often backed by multimillion-dollar contracts with the national security state, is being sold as a public good without scrutiny. “When companies with deep conflicts of interest are shaping policy and decision-making, we need to ask who benefits,” Webb argues. The hype surrounding AI, she warns, has created a public perception that algorithms are inherently smarter, more efficient, and more cost-effective than human judgment. This narrative, fueled by industry PR and amplified by a complicit media, obscures the reality: many AI systems are unproven, prone to errors, and deployed without rigorous oversight. In Rhode Island, an unverified algorithm could have dictated who could leave their homes or keep their businesses open—a power Webb deems “terrifying” when accuracy is questionable and accountability absent. At the heart of Webb’s critique is the erosion of civil liberties, a process she sees as opportunistic and accelerating. The national security state, long adept at exploiting crises to curtail freedoms, has found a willing partner in Silicon Valley. Together, they form a “fused blob” that operates with impunity, shielded by claims of proprietary technology and national interest. “This isn’t about stifling innovation,” Webb emphasizes. “It’s about ensuring that innovation doesn’t become a trojan horse for surveillance and control.” Webb’s call to action is clear: the public must demand transparency and independent validation of AI systems before they’re entrusted with life-altering decisions. From local governments to federal agencies, outsourcing to algorithms without rigorous debate is a recipe for disaster. She urges Americans to question the narratives pushed by tech giants and their government allies, to scrutinize conflicts of interest, and to prioritize civil liberties over blind faith in AI’s promise. “If we don’t have this discussion now,” she warns, “we risk waking up in a world where our freedoms are algorithmically determined—and no one asked for our consent.”

Camus

60,349 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Digital ID Will Change the Lives of Every Australian - For the Worse ... As much as the Government attempts to downplay the importance of introducing a single central digital identifier for all Australians, the truth is that this legislation is the most significant I've encountered during my time in the Senate. It's the glue that holds together the digital control agenda by which every Australian will be controlled, corralled, exploited and then gagged when they speak or act in opposition. The government knows Digital ID will be compulsory by the device of preventing access to government services, banking services, air travel and major purchases for any Australian who does not have a Digital ID. The Digital ID will, in effect, create a live data file of your movements, purchases, accounts and associates containing reference to every piece of data being held in the private and government sector as a first step in a wider agenda. Tech giants have been building huge data files on every Australian for years. Those huge data files that contain every website you visited, every post you made on their social media, everything you have ever bought online. Keywords scanned from conversations overheard by Siri and Alexa in your home are now unmasked. Until now, that data was anonymised using a unique identifier rather than name and address, which has always been there as well. However, tech companies were not allowed to use it or share data with others that included the person's name and address. Until Now. Look for the tech giants to ask for your Digital ID as a requirement of using their service. The point of that exercise is to ensure they put the right name on the right data treasure trove. This is why the Liberal Party have moved amendments to the Digital ID Bill to bring private corporations into this roll out earlier. All those treasure troves of data worth billions, trillions, that have been accumulated for years illegally, by retailers, tech and data companies - all that unrealised profit just sitting there has been too much of a temptation for the Liberal Nationals to resist and is now joined with Labor in pushing Digital ID. There will be no escape from the digital ID. Australians now have a digital version of "papers please" and Australians will never be the same.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

217,182 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren