正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

THE SURVEILLANCE STATE KILLED THE FIRST AND FOURTH AMENDMENTS Since Edward Snowden and Thomas Drake exposed the U.S. government’s secret surveillance programs, many Americans hoped the system would be reined in. Instead, it has grown larger, more sophisticated, and more invasive. Today, intelligence agencies possess industrial-scale capabilities to monitor... show more

Redacted

300,921 subscribers

16,987 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Journalist Whitney Webb reveals how U.S. intelligence agencies maintain close ties with leading tech companies—including Google, Palantir and Oracle—turning regular people into easy targets for digital surveillance and blackmail. According to Webb, many of these tech giants were born in the shadows of CIA projects, transforming government surveillance technologies into private sector products that keep tabs on your every move, without the backlash that direct state programs face.

Journalist Whitney Webb reveals how U.S. intelligence agencies maintain close ties with leading tech companies—including Google, Palantir and Oracle—turning regular people into easy targets for digital surveillance and blackmail. According to Webb, many of these tech giants were born in the shadows of CIA projects, transforming government surveillance technologies into private sector products that keep tabs on your every move, without the backlash that direct state programs face.

Wide Awake Media

51,417 次观看 • 1 个月前

NSA WHISTLEBLOWER WARNS: FLOCK’S SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM IS ALREADY HERE Thomas Drake warns that Flock cameras are no longer just crime-fighting tools. They are becoming the backbone of a real-time surveillance network that can track ordinary Americans wherever they go. By outsourcing the technology to private companies, governments can argue they are simply purchasing a product, while gaining the ability to monitor entire populations with fewer constitutional limits and less public oversight. And it goes far beyond license plates. Bluetooth, wireless signals, in-vehicle systems, phones, smartwatches, and connected devices can all become digital beacons. Combined, those signals can create a detailed profile of where you drive, who you visit, what events you attend, and how you move through your city. That data can then be stored, searched, and shared well beyond your local police department. Thomas Drake breaks down how license plate readers, Bluetooth tracking, wireless transmissions, vehicle data, and private surveillance companies are converging into a de facto tracking system for every American. When that system operates through corporations instead of directly through government, it creates a dangerous backdoor for misuse with far fewer safeguards than most people realize.

Redacted

14,155 次观看 • 3 天前

Flock Safety has deployed a nationwide network of more than 100,000 AI-powered surveillance cameras. In many communities, these cameras are positioned not only along roadways, but near schools, playgrounds, churches, and other places where Americans exercise their Constitutional rights. One example is a camera located near Rocky Bayou Baptist Church in Niceville, Florida. Does the federal government need to track who attends this church on a Sunday morning? Floridians deserve answers about why these AI surveillance cameras are needed and how the data they collect is being used. This is America, not China. The fundamental question is simple: Should government be able to monitor who attends a church, political meeting, or community gathering without judicial oversight? I believe the answer is no. Across the country, surveillance technology is expanding rapidly, yet many citizens remain unaware of where cameras are located, who has access to the data, and how that information may be used. Transparency and accountability must come before mass surveillance. As your next U.S. Congressman for Florida's First District, I will work to protect Americans' Constitutional rights and push for legislation requiring warrants before government agencies can use surveillance technology to monitor the activities of law-abiding citizens. I do not want my daughter's generation to inherit fewer freedoms than the generations that came before us. We should embrace innovation without sacrificing the liberties that define America. If you share that vision, stand with me. Together, we can protect privacy, defend Constitutional rights, and preserve freedom for future generations. Let's Save America Together.

Flock Safety has deployed a nationwide network of more than 100,000 AI-powered surveillance cameras. In many communities, these cameras are positioned not only along roadways, but near schools, playgrounds, churches, and other places where Americans exercise their Constitutional rights. One example is a camera located near Rocky Bayou Baptist Church in Niceville, Florida. Does the federal government need to track who attends this church on a Sunday morning? Floridians deserve answers about why these AI surveillance cameras are needed and how the data they collect is being used. This is America, not China. The fundamental question is simple: Should government be able to monitor who attends a church, political meeting, or community gathering without judicial oversight? I believe the answer is no. Across the country, surveillance technology is expanding rapidly, yet many citizens remain unaware of where cameras are located, who has access to the data, and how that information may be used. Transparency and accountability must come before mass surveillance. As your next U.S. Congressman for Florida's First District, I will work to protect Americans' Constitutional rights and push for legislation requiring warrants before government agencies can use surveillance technology to monitor the activities of law-abiding citizens. I do not want my daughter's generation to inherit fewer freedoms than the generations that came before us. We should embrace innovation without sacrificing the liberties that define America. If you share that vision, stand with me. Together, we can protect privacy, defend Constitutional rights, and preserve freedom for future generations. Let's Save America Together.

Douglas Chico

32,962 次观看 • 2 个月前

Norfolk, Virginia has been quietly installing hundreds of Flock cameras enabling mass, warrantless surveillance that tracks innocent people’s movements A federal judge has sided with Americans and ordered locations public “A federal judge in Norfolk has made the locations of more than 600 flock safety surveillance cameras across Hampton Roads public. The first time such a list has ever been released. Local cities and counties had previously denied requests for this information, citing Virginia's open records law and critical infrastructure protections. But now a federal lawsuit claims the city's use of these cameras violates Fourth Amendment rights, which protects against unreasonable search and seizures. The complaint filed The Flock system, filed in 2024, seeks to stop Norfolk's use of the Flock system and erase the data already collected.” Flock Cameras offer - Privacy Erosion and Mass Surveillance - Indiscriminate Data Collection - National Data Sharing - Unauthorized Access by Federal Agencies - Easy Exploitation for hacking, many using just a USB stick with no mandatory multi-factor authentication and credentials - Lack of Transparency and Oversight

Norfolk, Virginia has been quietly installing hundreds of Flock cameras enabling mass, warrantless surveillance that tracks innocent people’s movements A federal judge has sided with Americans and ordered locations public “A federal judge in Norfolk has made the locations of more than 600 flock safety surveillance cameras across Hampton Roads public. The first time such a list has ever been released. Local cities and counties had previously denied requests for this information, citing Virginia's open records law and critical infrastructure protections. But now a federal lawsuit claims the city's use of these cameras violates Fourth Amendment rights, which protects against unreasonable search and seizures. The complaint filed The Flock system, filed in 2024, seeks to stop Norfolk's use of the Flock system and erase the data already collected.” Flock Cameras offer - Privacy Erosion and Mass Surveillance - Indiscriminate Data Collection - National Data Sharing - Unauthorized Access by Federal Agencies - Easy Exploitation for hacking, many using just a USB stick with no mandatory multi-factor authentication and credentials - Lack of Transparency and Oversight

Wall Street Apes

158,231 次观看 • 8 个月前

NSA WHISTLEBLOWER: FLOCK CAMERAS ARE BUILDING A 24/7 SURVEILLANCE GRID NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake is warning that Flock cameras are not just “crime‑fighting tools”; they are the backbone of a growing surveillance ecosystem designed to track the movements of ordinary citizens in real time. By outsourcing this infrastructure to private companies, governments can sidestep constitutional limits and claim they’re merely “buying a product,” even as they gain full ability to monitor entire populations. This network doesn’t stop at license plates. With technologies that can detect Bluetooth and other wireless signals, your car’s plate, your phone, your smartwatch, and other devices all become beacons. Together, they feed into systems that can build detailed profiles of where you drive, who you visit, which events you attend, and how you move through your city. All data that can then be stored, queried, and shared far beyond your local police department. Thomas Drake breaks down how these converging signals- license plate readers, Bluetooth and wireless transmissions, in‑vehicle communication systems, and more create a de facto tracking system on every American. And when that system is run through private corporations instead of directly by government, it opens a dangerous backdoor: the unlimited power to quietly misuse this data, with far less oversight and far fewer constitutional protections than most people realize.

NSA WHISTLEBLOWER: FLOCK CAMERAS ARE BUILDING A 24/7 SURVEILLANCE GRID NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake is warning that Flock cameras are not just “crime‑fighting tools”; they are the backbone of a growing surveillance ecosystem designed to track the movements of ordinary citizens in real time. By outsourcing this infrastructure to private companies, governments can sidestep constitutional limits and claim they’re merely “buying a product,” even as they gain full ability to monitor entire populations. This network doesn’t stop at license plates. With technologies that can detect Bluetooth and other wireless signals, your car’s plate, your phone, your smartwatch, and other devices all become beacons. Together, they feed into systems that can build detailed profiles of where you drive, who you visit, which events you attend, and how you move through your city. All data that can then be stored, queried, and shared far beyond your local police department. Thomas Drake breaks down how these converging signals- license plate readers, Bluetooth and wireless transmissions, in‑vehicle communication systems, and more create a de facto tracking system on every American. And when that system is run through private corporations instead of directly by government, it opens a dangerous backdoor: the unlimited power to quietly misuse this data, with far less oversight and far fewer constitutional protections than most people realize.

Redacted

66,799 次观看 • 25 天前

Palantir Was Engineered to Bypass the Constitution. Whitney Webb’s reporting lays out a disturbing origin story for Palantir — one that goes far beyond the glossy tech‑savior branding the company sells today. According to her research, Palantir didn’t begin as a private innovation at all. It began as a DARPA‑backed surveillance project designed to fuse government intelligence, private data, and predictive policing into a single system with almost no constitutional limits. When the program’s scope collided with civil‑liberty protections, it wasn’t shut down — it was quietly moved out of government, rebranded as a “private” company, and allowed to continue building the same tools with fewer restrictions and far less oversight. The mission didn’t change. Only the logo did. Today, Palantir markets itself as a neutral analytics platform, but its architecture reflects its origins: mass data ingestion, behavioral modeling, and real‑time tracking capabilities that raise serious questions about privacy, democratic accountability, and the merging of state power with corporate surveillance. This isn’t just a tech story. It’s a warning about how intelligence infrastructure can be laundered through the private sector to avoid constitutional scrutiny — and how easily the line between national security and domestic monitoring can disappear when no one is watching. 🎩 Whitney Webb

0️⃣BlackBetty ⚓️

24,708 次观看 • 22 天前

Thomas Massie and Lauren Boebert just declared war on the mass surveillance state. “FISA 702 is just the tip of the iceberg … ” “There have been so many erosions of our Fourth Amendment right to privacy.” “The Bank Secrecy Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, the Patriot Act … all of them created so-called loopholes in the Constitution.” “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act … is used to go after Americans.” “I’ve been in a SCIF last week where I saw two secret rulings … of how the government has created additional loopholes to spy on you that I’m not even allowed to tell you.” “And finally, the third-party doctrine.” “It’s based on a ruling of the Supreme Court … I think it was a bad ruling, but it’s been expanded in its interpretation to include things like doctor’s appointment records, bank records, phone records … Flock cameras.” “Imagine … that you turn AI loose on these databases.” “Now, there’s virtually nothing the government can’t know about you without a warrant.” “That is why we’ve created … the Surveillance Accountability Act.” “It closes these loopholes that I’ve explained.” “And more importantly, it creates a private right of action.” “It’s almost impossible to sue federal government employees if they infringe on your constitutional rights.” “The second half of this bill gives you the right to sue the government employee.” “If they infringe on your constitutional rights, they could be privately and personally sued for that.” Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress Lauren Boebert

Thomas Massie and Lauren Boebert just declared war on the mass surveillance state. “FISA 702 is just the tip of the iceberg … ” “There have been so many erosions of our Fourth Amendment right to privacy.” “The Bank Secrecy Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, the Patriot Act … all of them created so-called loopholes in the Constitution.” “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act … is used to go after Americans.” “I’ve been in a SCIF last week where I saw two secret rulings … of how the government has created additional loopholes to spy on you that I’m not even allowed to tell you.” “And finally, the third-party doctrine.” “It’s based on a ruling of the Supreme Court … I think it was a bad ruling, but it’s been expanded in its interpretation to include things like doctor’s appointment records, bank records, phone records … Flock cameras.” “Imagine … that you turn AI loose on these databases.” “Now, there’s virtually nothing the government can’t know about you without a warrant.” “That is why we’ve created … the Surveillance Accountability Act.” “It closes these loopholes that I’ve explained.” “And more importantly, it creates a private right of action.” “It’s almost impossible to sue federal government employees if they infringe on your constitutional rights.” “The second half of this bill gives you the right to sue the government employee.” “If they infringe on your constitutional rights, they could be privately and personally sued for that.” Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress Lauren Boebert

Holden Culotta

57,703 次观看 • 3 个月前

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 Biden Admin trying to use the “drone” situation to pass a bill giving government wireless surveillance access to our phones “The bill before us would grant law enforcement significant authority to intercept private electronic communications without consent — To grant sweeping surveillance powers” “The bill would allow the government to conduct dragnet surveillance of the phones, innocent Americans traveling through US airports as long as the government claims they're doing it to neutralize a drone. So in order to look at the information that might be coming to a drone, it may be that you capture all the information of everybody surrounding an airport or everybody who lives near an airport. Once you have all that data, what are the assurances that the government isn't looking at your data in addition to the data that may be related to flying a drone?” “This is not just about security. It's about unchecked government overreach. It's about capitalizing on fear and media driven austerity to jam through sweeping legislation that could violate the civil liberties of American people.”

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 Biden Admin trying to use the “drone” situation to pass a bill giving government wireless surveillance access to our phones “The bill before us would grant law enforcement significant authority to intercept private electronic communications without consent — To grant sweeping surveillance powers” “The bill would allow the government to conduct dragnet surveillance of the phones, innocent Americans traveling through US airports as long as the government claims they're doing it to neutralize a drone. So in order to look at the information that might be coming to a drone, it may be that you capture all the information of everybody surrounding an airport or everybody who lives near an airport. Once you have all that data, what are the assurances that the government isn't looking at your data in addition to the data that may be related to flying a drone?” “This is not just about security. It's about unchecked government overreach. It's about capitalizing on fear and media driven austerity to jam through sweeping legislation that could violate the civil liberties of American people.”

Wall Street Apes

1,799,492 次观看 • 1 年前

Stephen Timms, "New clause gives government the power to inspect the bank accounts of anyone claiming a social security benefit: child benefit, state pension, universal credit” "Why is the government bringing these powers forward now, with zero scrutiny? The state has always had powers concerning benefits fraud, this proposal for surveillance when there is no suspicion at all, is a substantial expansion of the state’s power to intrude” “The amendment gives the government extremely broad powers, with no checks in place, and it’s being done in a way that minimises parliament scrutiny. And I find it hard to see how it can be defended” 2016: Take back control 2023: Turn UK into North Korea where government has access to your bank account willy nilly

Stephen Timms, "New clause gives government the power to inspect the bank accounts of anyone claiming a social security benefit: child benefit, state pension, universal credit” "Why is the government bringing these powers forward now, with zero scrutiny? The state has always had powers concerning benefits fraud, this proposal for surveillance when there is no suspicion at all, is a substantial expansion of the state’s power to intrude” “The amendment gives the government extremely broad powers, with no checks in place, and it’s being done in a way that minimises parliament scrutiny. And I find it hard to see how it can be defended” 2016: Take back control 2023: Turn UK into North Korea where government has access to your bank account willy nilly

Farrukh

2,411,948 次观看 • 2 年前

👁‍🗨Not Dead Yet | S1E1 — Bruce Schneier The Edward Snowden leaks were more than 12 years ago. It opened the world's eyes to government mass surveillance and the power of data, but what really changed? In the first episode of Not Dead Yet, Robert Baggs speaks with Bruce Schneier, a New York Times bestseller, fellow at Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, and security technologist. Timestamps: 00:00 – Intro 02:43 – The world since the Snowden leak 05:04 – What’s worse for privacy, Big Tech or government agencies? 07:19 – Surveillance capitalism and the horrors of AI 09:34 – How powerful is data? 13:07 – The tracking device in your pocket 15:34 – The Le Monde investigation 17:10 – The rise of bulk spying 19:03 – The danger of AI in surveillance 21:52 – Should personalized ads be illegal? 23:05 – Is AI the biggest current threat to privacy? 23:43 – What can we do to preserve our privacy? 25:35 – Should privacy be a political issue? 27:38 – Not all data is equal 28:47 – If you’ve got nothing to hide, why do you care? 30:41 – Are we doomed to slip into a dystopian world? 34:14 – AI and the rewiring of democracy

👁‍🗨Not Dead Yet | S1E1 — Bruce Schneier The Edward Snowden leaks were more than 12 years ago. It opened the world's eyes to government mass surveillance and the power of data, but what really changed? In the first episode of Not Dead Yet, Robert Baggs speaks with Bruce Schneier, a New York Times bestseller, fellow at Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, and security technologist. Timestamps: 00:00 – Intro 02:43 – The world since the Snowden leak 05:04 – What’s worse for privacy, Big Tech or government agencies? 07:19 – Surveillance capitalism and the horrors of AI 09:34 – How powerful is data? 13:07 – The tracking device in your pocket 15:34 – The Le Monde investigation 17:10 – The rise of bulk spying 19:03 – The danger of AI in surveillance 21:52 – Should personalized ads be illegal? 23:05 – Is AI the biggest current threat to privacy? 23:43 – What can we do to preserve our privacy? 25:35 – Should privacy be a political issue? 27:38 – Not all data is equal 28:47 – If you’ve got nothing to hide, why do you care? 30:41 – Are we doomed to slip into a dystopian world? 34:14 – AI and the rewiring of democracy

Cointelegraph

129,818 次观看 • 7 个月前

🏛️ House Blocks Section 702 Surveillance Extension 🔹The House on Thursday rejected a three-week extension of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, voting 198-218 and falling short of the two-thirds majority required under the expedited process. The measure would have extended the warrantless foreign surveillance program through July 2. 🔹19 Republicans joined nearly every Democrat in voting against the patch, while 7 Democrats voted in favor. 🔹Many Democrats withheld support over President Donald Trump’s plan to install Bill Pulte, head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and a close ally with no national security experience, as acting director of national intelligence on June 19. Some Republican holdouts opposed the bill demanding a warrant requirement for querying US citizens’ data. 🔹With the House leaving for a week-long recess and not expected to vote again until June 23, Section 702 is poised to expire this week. Speaker Mike Johnson, asked whether he would bring the House back, said, “What would be the point?” The program’s surveillance operations can continue regardless, as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has already recertified Section 702 through March 2027.

🏛️ House Blocks Section 702 Surveillance Extension 🔹The House on Thursday rejected a three-week extension of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, voting 198-218 and falling short of the two-thirds majority required under the expedited process. The measure would have extended the warrantless foreign surveillance program through July 2. 🔹19 Republicans joined nearly every Democrat in voting against the patch, while 7 Democrats voted in favor. 🔹Many Democrats withheld support over President Donald Trump’s plan to install Bill Pulte, head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and a close ally with no national security experience, as acting director of national intelligence on June 19. Some Republican holdouts opposed the bill demanding a warrant requirement for querying US citizens’ data. 🔹With the House leaving for a week-long recess and not expected to vote again until June 23, Section 702 is poised to expire this week. Speaker Mike Johnson, asked whether he would bring the House back, said, “What would be the point?” The program’s surveillance operations can continue regardless, as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has already recertified Section 702 through March 2027.

Drop Site

37,967 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 "FLOCK YOU PETER THIEL!" — AMERICANS ARE RAGING & FIGHTING BACK AGAINST HIS SURVEILLANCE EMPIRE People are done staying quiet. A new clip showing Peter Thiel’s companies Palantir and Flock has the internet raging. Palantir, the all-seeing data monster, hoovers up massive amounts of information and turns it into actionable intelligence. Flock blankets neighborhoods with license plate readers and cameras. They’re now bragging about “Maven Smart System”, their flagship AI tool that fuses multiple data feeds into one clean god-mode interface. Left click. Right click. Detection becomes action. No more clunky systems. Just one terrifyingly efficient machine for total surveillance and targeting. This is why people are screaming “Flock you, Peter Thiel” — because his companies are building the backbone of a full blown surveillance state in plain sight. They sell it as “public safety.” Americans see it as the end of privacy and the beginning of total control. Are you still okay with Peter Thiel building the digital cage around us, or are you finally ready to admit this is a full-blown surveillance state?

🚨 "FLOCK YOU PETER THIEL!" — AMERICANS ARE RAGING & FIGHTING BACK AGAINST HIS SURVEILLANCE EMPIRE People are done staying quiet. A new clip showing Peter Thiel’s companies Palantir and Flock has the internet raging. Palantir, the all-seeing data monster, hoovers up massive amounts of information and turns it into actionable intelligence. Flock blankets neighborhoods with license plate readers and cameras. They’re now bragging about “Maven Smart System”, their flagship AI tool that fuses multiple data feeds into one clean god-mode interface. Left click. Right click. Detection becomes action. No more clunky systems. Just one terrifyingly efficient machine for total surveillance and targeting. This is why people are screaming “Flock you, Peter Thiel” — because his companies are building the backbone of a full blown surveillance state in plain sight. They sell it as “public safety.” Americans see it as the end of privacy and the beginning of total control. Are you still okay with Peter Thiel building the digital cage around us, or are you finally ready to admit this is a full-blown surveillance state?

HustleBitch

52,705 次观看 • 1 个月前

John Solomon is pointing at something much bigger here... the real story is not Tulsi leaving... it’s what Tulsi can still expose before she does... She has roughly 30 days left in position with access to the declassification pipeline... Records tied to censorship coordination, intelligence abuse, regime change operations, surveillance programs, media collusion, and internal government communications can still be reviewed, documented, and handed off for the next phase... Trump has a pattern of putting people near the exact systems they spent years warning the public about... because they already know how the machine works from the inside... Tulsi walked away from the Democrat power structure years ago because she saw where it was heading... endless war narratives... intelligence agencies shaping public opinion... Big Tech censorship... media acting like an extension of the state instead of watchdogs over it... Now many of the same things she warned about are becoming public piece by piece through leaks, testimony, and declassification... These next ~30 days are not symbolic... they are a final window to pull information out into the open before the baton gets handed to the next person...

John Solomon is pointing at something much bigger here... the real story is not Tulsi leaving... it’s what Tulsi can still expose before she does... She has roughly 30 days left in position with access to the declassification pipeline... Records tied to censorship coordination, intelligence abuse, regime change operations, surveillance programs, media collusion, and internal government communications can still be reviewed, documented, and handed off for the next phase... Trump has a pattern of putting people near the exact systems they spent years warning the public about... because they already know how the machine works from the inside... Tulsi walked away from the Democrat power structure years ago because she saw where it was heading... endless war narratives... intelligence agencies shaping public opinion... Big Tech censorship... media acting like an extension of the state instead of watchdogs over it... Now many of the same things she warned about are becoming public piece by piece through leaks, testimony, and declassification... These next ~30 days are not symbolic... they are a final window to pull information out into the open before the baton gets handed to the next person...

Observing Consciousness

24,698 次观看 • 2 个月前

$🚨 THEY FOUND A LEGAL WAY TO SPY ON EVERY AMERICAN — AND THE 4TH AMENDMENT CAN'T STOP IT Most Americans believe the government needs a warrant to monitor them, track them, or collect detailed information about their private lives. But unfortunately, they found a loophole. The government may not be allowed to directly collect certain information on Americans, but private companies collect enormous amounts of it every single day through smartphones, apps, websites, search engines, location services, online purchases, and countless other digital tools most people use without a second thought. That means your location history, browsing habits, purchases, interests, movements, and daily routines are already being recorded, stored, and traded by an entire industry that most Americans have never even heard of. The loophole is that while the government may not be allowed to collect certain information directly without a warrant, it can reportedly purchase data that private companies have already collected. The information may be gathered by private companies. The data may be sold by data brokers. And the government may still end up with access to it. For years, there was one major limitation. There was simply too much data. Even if someone wanted to analyze billions of data points across millions of people, it would have required an impossible number of human analysts. Then AI arrived. Suddenly, information that would have taken years to organize can be processed, searched, categorized, connected, and analyzed in a fraction of the time. People are warning that the combination of artificial intelligence and the data broker loophole could fundamentally change what surveillance looks like in America. For the first time in history, technology may finally exist that can sift through enormous amounts of personal information at a scale that was previously impossible. The question isn't whether the data exists. The question is who has access to it. Because once your location, habits, purchases, interests, relationships, and daily routines can all be analyzed by machines, the line between convenience and surveillance starts getting harder to see. The most alarming part? Most Americans have no idea this conversation is even happening. Do you trust the government with more information about your life than your own family knows?$

🚨 THEY FOUND A LEGAL WAY TO SPY ON EVERY AMERICAN — AND THE 4TH AMENDMENT CAN'T STOP IT Most Americans believe the government needs a warrant to monitor them, track them, or collect detailed information about their private lives. But unfortunately, they found a loophole. The government may not be allowed to directly collect certain information on Americans, but private companies collect enormous amounts of it every single day through smartphones, apps, websites, search engines, location services, online purchases, and countless other digital tools most people use without a second thought. That means your location history, browsing habits, purchases, interests, movements, and daily routines are already being recorded, stored, and traded by an entire industry that most Americans have never even heard of. The loophole is that while the government may not be allowed to collect certain information directly without a warrant, it can reportedly purchase data that private companies have already collected. The information may be gathered by private companies. The data may be sold by data brokers. And the government may still end up with access to it. For years, there was one major limitation. There was simply too much data. Even if someone wanted to analyze billions of data points across millions of people, it would have required an impossible number of human analysts. Then AI arrived. Suddenly, information that would have taken years to organize can be processed, searched, categorized, connected, and analyzed in a fraction of the time. People are warning that the combination of artificial intelligence and the data broker loophole could fundamentally change what surveillance looks like in America. For the first time in history, technology may finally exist that can sift through enormous amounts of personal information at a scale that was previously impossible. The question isn't whether the data exists. The question is who has access to it. Because once your location, habits, purchases, interests, relationships, and daily routines can all be analyzed by machines, the line between convenience and surveillance starts getting harder to see. The most alarming part? Most Americans have no idea this conversation is even happening. Do you trust the government with more information about your life than your own family knows?

HustleBitch

23,930 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 AMERICANS ARE DECLARING WAR ON FLOCK CAMERAS — AND PEOPLE ARE TEARING THEM DOWN Something is happening all over America. People aren't just complaining about surveillance cameras anymore. They're taking action. Reports are emerging of Flock cameras being cut down, damaged, disabled, and targeted in multiple cities. Why? Because what started as a tool to track stolen vehicles has turned into something many people believe is far bigger. The breaking point came when public records reportedly revealed that federal agencies had conducted thousands of searches through local camera networks. For many people, that confirmed their worst fears. But now the story is getting even darker. People are learning the next generation of surveillance won't stop at license plates. New systems are already being discussed that could potentially pull Bluetooth identifiers from phones, smart watches, earbuds, and other devices traveling inside vehicles. In other words, your car may not be the thing they're interested in tracking. You are. Meanwhile, cities across the country are beginning to reconsider their contracts as public backlash continues to grow. And as more cameras go up, more cameras seem to be coming down. How much surveillance are people supposed to tolerate before they start fighting back?

🚨 AMERICANS ARE DECLARING WAR ON FLOCK CAMERAS — AND PEOPLE ARE TEARING THEM DOWN Something is happening all over America. People aren't just complaining about surveillance cameras anymore. They're taking action. Reports are emerging of Flock cameras being cut down, damaged, disabled, and targeted in multiple cities. Why? Because what started as a tool to track stolen vehicles has turned into something many people believe is far bigger. The breaking point came when public records reportedly revealed that federal agencies had conducted thousands of searches through local camera networks. For many people, that confirmed their worst fears. But now the story is getting even darker. People are learning the next generation of surveillance won't stop at license plates. New systems are already being discussed that could potentially pull Bluetooth identifiers from phones, smart watches, earbuds, and other devices traveling inside vehicles. In other words, your car may not be the thing they're interested in tracking. You are. Meanwhile, cities across the country are beginning to reconsider their contracts as public backlash continues to grow. And as more cameras go up, more cameras seem to be coming down. How much surveillance are people supposed to tolerate before they start fighting back?

HustleBitch

100,399 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Feeling of Being under 24/7 Surveillance Changes People’s Behavior—and Strips Innovation from the Culture "Protect Your Privacy: Take Action with Dr. Jon Padfield" Dr. Jon Padfield is an engineer turned state representative turned business professor. In this fascinating interview, he offers a wealth of intelligence on how you can protect your privacy in the face of ever-encroaching technology. Who and what has you under surveillance in your car, with your phone, and in your home? We walk through the changes in technology that are converting your car into a surveillance trap, compromising your phone and ambient conversations, and turning your home into a public space accessible to those who want access to your intimate conversations and personal life. What are the many practical steps you can take to protect your privacy? You will be amazed by how many practical things you can do that can make a difference. Make sure to have pen and paper ready—Dr. Padfield lays out your action steps and focuses you on the top priorities. Those priorities include supporting the state and local representatives who are fighting for your freedom. Padfield’s two terms as a state representative in Indiana gave him an excellent understanding of the opportunities to take action in your community and engage with your representatives and senators in the statehouse. Full Report: Subscribe to

The Feeling of Being under 24/7 Surveillance Changes People’s Behavior—and Strips Innovation from the Culture "Protect Your Privacy: Take Action with Dr. Jon Padfield" Dr. Jon Padfield is an engineer turned state representative turned business professor. In this fascinating interview, he offers a wealth of intelligence on how you can protect your privacy in the face of ever-encroaching technology. Who and what has you under surveillance in your car, with your phone, and in your home? We walk through the changes in technology that are converting your car into a surveillance trap, compromising your phone and ambient conversations, and turning your home into a public space accessible to those who want access to your intimate conversations and personal life. What are the many practical steps you can take to protect your privacy? You will be amazed by how many practical things you can do that can make a difference. Make sure to have pen and paper ready—Dr. Padfield lays out your action steps and focuses you on the top priorities. Those priorities include supporting the state and local representatives who are fighting for your freedom. Padfield’s two terms as a state representative in Indiana gave him an excellent understanding of the opportunities to take action in your community and engage with your representatives and senators in the statehouse. Full Report: Subscribe to

The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts

14,884 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: "You’re Still Being Tracked": Privacy Expert Naomi Brockwell on Escaping Surveillance in the Digital Age 🔗 Watch: Naomi Brockwell is a globally recognized privacy advocate, tech journalist, and the founder of the Ludlow Institute, an organization focused on privacy education and policy. She is best known for her work promoting digital privacy, decentralized technologies, and civil liberties in the age of surveillance. “Tech is a tool. And I think we sometimes see the advancement of tech as a bad thing because it’s been hijacked for things like surveillance. That’s bad. The fact that we’ve been fueling these surveillance industries for decades now has really created this asymetrian society,” says Brockwell. She frequently produces content on issues related to encryption, blockchain, AI surveillance, and data rights, and has built a strong following through her YouTube Channel and speaking engagements around the world. Brockwell has also worked closely with libertarian economist and media personality John Stossel helping to explain complex topics like cryptocurrency, privacy law, and government surveillance in accessible, engaging formats. Their shared advocacy for individual rights and limited government has made her a frequent collaborator and trusted voice in Stossel’s reporting and digital platforms. In a time when automated cameras, license plate readers, and AI surveillance systems are spreading across Arizona, Brockwell lays out a roadmap for how citizens can engage local officials in meaningful dialogue about data privacy, civil liberties, and unchecked surveillance power. “We still live in a society where privacy is possible,” Brockwell said. “And we get a lot of amazing benefits from that—because of brave people willing to push back and do hard things to keep society self-correcting. We don’t want to lose that.” She emphasizes confronting surveillance starts not with outrage, but understanding. “If you try to convince people of your value system, it's a really tall ask,” she said. “Instead, ask: why are these officials supporting the surveillance apparatus? What are they trying to gain?” According to Brockwell, most policymakers genuinely believe they’re building safer, smarter communities—using technology to “catch bad guys” and increase efficiency. But those good intentions, she warns, often blind officials to what’s being lost in the process. “This surveillance apparatus centralizes control and makes individuals more vulnerable,” she said. “It eliminates checks and balances. And once the power imbalance grows too large, citizens lose the ability to hold elected officials accountable.” The consequences aren’t abstract. Brockwell says the architecture of surveillance—often installed without public debate—directly threatens freedoms we take for granted: movement, association, and the ability to support causes without fear of being tracked or profiled. “We no longer have recourse,” she said. “And that’s a really scary situation.” Even opting out of technology won’t shield people from the surveillance dragnet. “Even if you throw out all of your digital devices, you can’t escape it,” Brockwell said. “It’s in the streets. It’s in your everyday life. Whether you have a phone or not, you’re still being tracked.” Brockwell argues that while artificial intelligence is being used to supercharge surveillance—from government to corporate applications—very few resources are being directed at defending privacy rights. “I think AI is just powerful compute—used to find patterns and do things beyond human capability,” she said. “The question is: what do we want to supercharge? Right now, there’s a lot of vested interest in supercharging surveillance. But I want to see us supercharge privacy. What kind of privacy tools can we build around AI?” As Arizona lawmakers weigh proposals on photo radar, automated enforcement, and real-time crime centers, Brockwell’s message is clear: the surveillance state isn’t coming. It’s already here. And unless the public reclaims its voice, accountability may disappear with it. #wvf #news2jb #ai #azleg #privacy Naomi Brockwell priv/acc 🔗 Watch:

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: "You’re Still Being Tracked": Privacy Expert Naomi Brockwell on Escaping Surveillance in the Digital Age 🔗 Watch: Naomi Brockwell is a globally recognized privacy advocate, tech journalist, and the founder of the Ludlow Institute, an organization focused on privacy education and policy. She is best known for her work promoting digital privacy, decentralized technologies, and civil liberties in the age of surveillance. “Tech is a tool. And I think we sometimes see the advancement of tech as a bad thing because it’s been hijacked for things like surveillance. That’s bad. The fact that we’ve been fueling these surveillance industries for decades now has really created this asymetrian society,” says Brockwell. She frequently produces content on issues related to encryption, blockchain, AI surveillance, and data rights, and has built a strong following through her YouTube Channel and speaking engagements around the world. Brockwell has also worked closely with libertarian economist and media personality John Stossel helping to explain complex topics like cryptocurrency, privacy law, and government surveillance in accessible, engaging formats. Their shared advocacy for individual rights and limited government has made her a frequent collaborator and trusted voice in Stossel’s reporting and digital platforms. In a time when automated cameras, license plate readers, and AI surveillance systems are spreading across Arizona, Brockwell lays out a roadmap for how citizens can engage local officials in meaningful dialogue about data privacy, civil liberties, and unchecked surveillance power. “We still live in a society where privacy is possible,” Brockwell said. “And we get a lot of amazing benefits from that—because of brave people willing to push back and do hard things to keep society self-correcting. We don’t want to lose that.” She emphasizes confronting surveillance starts not with outrage, but understanding. “If you try to convince people of your value system, it's a really tall ask,” she said. “Instead, ask: why are these officials supporting the surveillance apparatus? What are they trying to gain?” According to Brockwell, most policymakers genuinely believe they’re building safer, smarter communities—using technology to “catch bad guys” and increase efficiency. But those good intentions, she warns, often blind officials to what’s being lost in the process. “This surveillance apparatus centralizes control and makes individuals more vulnerable,” she said. “It eliminates checks and balances. And once the power imbalance grows too large, citizens lose the ability to hold elected officials accountable.” The consequences aren’t abstract. Brockwell says the architecture of surveillance—often installed without public debate—directly threatens freedoms we take for granted: movement, association, and the ability to support causes without fear of being tracked or profiled. “We no longer have recourse,” she said. “And that’s a really scary situation.” Even opting out of technology won’t shield people from the surveillance dragnet. “Even if you throw out all of your digital devices, you can’t escape it,” Brockwell said. “It’s in the streets. It’s in your everyday life. Whether you have a phone or not, you’re still being tracked.” Brockwell argues that while artificial intelligence is being used to supercharge surveillance—from government to corporate applications—very few resources are being directed at defending privacy rights. “I think AI is just powerful compute—used to find patterns and do things beyond human capability,” she said. “The question is: what do we want to supercharge? Right now, there’s a lot of vested interest in supercharging surveillance. But I want to see us supercharge privacy. What kind of privacy tools can we build around AI?” As Arizona lawmakers weigh proposals on photo radar, automated enforcement, and real-time crime centers, Brockwell’s message is clear: the surveillance state isn’t coming. It’s already here. And unless the public reclaims its voice, accountability may disappear with it. #wvf #news2jb #ai #azleg #privacy Naomi Brockwell priv/acc 🔗 Watch:

West Valley Jen

11,885 次观看 • 1 年前

Kash Patel on FBI Director Chris Wray’s Illegal Surveillance of Americans. "Chris Wray was caught last year illegally using 702 collection methods against Americans—274,000 times. That’s not my number; it’s in the report that the FISA court wrote." "The FISA court was supposed to oversee this process, but during Russiagate, they targeted an American citizen to get into a presidential campaign of all American citizens." "The problem is, the people given the FISA authorities in the deep state leadership levels—they’re the ones that abused it, broke the law, and corrupted it." "Congress had a chance to fix FISA this year, but instead, the majority in the House, Republicans included, bent the knee and reauthorized it. Why? They said, 'We’ll just kick the can down the road another year.'" "The government doesn’t own private sector companies like Google, Verizon, or Apple, but they compel them to comply with federal court orders. And those companies are not allowed to inform the target of the investigation—hence the Google case with me." "Google was ordered not to tell me about the surveillance, but five years later, they could. That’s how broken the system is." "We’ve shown you how they abused FISA once already, and now you know about Chris Wray and 702 abuses. Yet they gave him more spy powers. This is why reform is critical." "Mayorkas and Wray testified to Congress that 24 known foreign terrorists entered the U.S., and they lost them. Where are they?"

Kash Patel on FBI Director Chris Wray’s Illegal Surveillance of Americans. "Chris Wray was caught last year illegally using 702 collection methods against Americans—274,000 times. That’s not my number; it’s in the report that the FISA court wrote." "The FISA court was supposed to oversee this process, but during Russiagate, they targeted an American citizen to get into a presidential campaign of all American citizens." "The problem is, the people given the FISA authorities in the deep state leadership levels—they’re the ones that abused it, broke the law, and corrupted it." "Congress had a chance to fix FISA this year, but instead, the majority in the House, Republicans included, bent the knee and reauthorized it. Why? They said, 'We’ll just kick the can down the road another year.'" "The government doesn’t own private sector companies like Google, Verizon, or Apple, but they compel them to comply with federal court orders. And those companies are not allowed to inform the target of the investigation—hence the Google case with me." "Google was ordered not to tell me about the surveillance, but five years later, they could. That’s how broken the system is." "We’ve shown you how they abused FISA once already, and now you know about Chris Wray and 702 abuses. Yet they gave him more spy powers. This is why reform is critical." "Mayorkas and Wray testified to Congress that 24 known foreign terrorists entered the U.S., and they lost them. Where are they?"

Shawn Ryan

218,609 次观看 • 1 年前

DOGE EXPOSED WHAT USAID WAS REALLY FUNDING Rep. Ro Khanna is accusing Elon Musk and DOGE of being responsible for the mass murder of children. But DOGE’s findings reveal the real story of the scale of government spending and corruption that had been hidden from American taxpayers. Billions of taxpayer dollars were flowing into programs around the world, including efforts to influence foreign governments, fund controversial social initiatives overseas, and organizations with ties to extremist and terrorist groups. The investigation also highlighted U.S. taxpayer money going to the Taliban in Afghanistan, as well as projects in Yemen and Syria. USAID, with roughly 10,000 employees and an annual budget of about $40 billion, was found to have funded projects ranging from electric vehicles in Vietnam, transgender clinics in India and Guatemala, LGBTQ advocacy programs in Serbia, Jamaica, North Macedonia, and Nepal, a new Sesame Street program in Iraq, anti-misinformation campaigns in Kazakhstan, media projects in Cuba and Sri Lanka, disability inclusion programs in Belarus, and other overseas initiatives. DOGE also exposed that hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars were directed to radical organizations around the world, including funds that reached groups aligned with foreign terrorist organizations, as well as food assistance linked to the al-Qaeda-affiliated Nusra Front. These findings expose USAID as a government-run money laundering operation that diverted taxpayer dollars into foreign political agendas and organizations far removed from America’s interests. Those who benefited most from the system are now panicking as these programs come under public scrutiny. I discuss these findings and their implications with Eric_Eggers.

DOGE EXPOSED WHAT USAID WAS REALLY FUNDING Rep. Ro Khanna is accusing Elon Musk and DOGE of being responsible for the mass murder of children. But DOGE’s findings reveal the real story of the scale of government spending and corruption that had been hidden from American taxpayers. Billions of taxpayer dollars were flowing into programs around the world, including efforts to influence foreign governments, fund controversial social initiatives overseas, and organizations with ties to extremist and terrorist groups. The investigation also highlighted U.S. taxpayer money going to the Taliban in Afghanistan, as well as projects in Yemen and Syria. USAID, with roughly 10,000 employees and an annual budget of about $40 billion, was found to have funded projects ranging from electric vehicles in Vietnam, transgender clinics in India and Guatemala, LGBTQ advocacy programs in Serbia, Jamaica, North Macedonia, and Nepal, a new Sesame Street program in Iraq, anti-misinformation campaigns in Kazakhstan, media projects in Cuba and Sri Lanka, disability inclusion programs in Belarus, and other overseas initiatives. DOGE also exposed that hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars were directed to radical organizations around the world, including funds that reached groups aligned with foreign terrorist organizations, as well as food assistance linked to the al-Qaeda-affiliated Nusra Front. These findings expose USAID as a government-run money laundering operation that diverted taxpayer dollars into foreign political agendas and organizations far removed from America’s interests. Those who benefited most from the system are now panicking as these programs come under public scrutiny. I discuss these findings and their implications with Eric_Eggers.

Ben Swann

13,712 次观看 • 1 个月前

"The Flock issue is a mirror into what's been happening on the internet for over a decade."- LukΞ Mulks 🦁⟁◎⟁ The same third-party data collection that's been building detailed profiles of us online is now becoming visible in the physical world through systems like Flock Safety. When you combine license plate readers, location data, audio and years of online tracking, you end up with an incredibly detailed surveillance profile. As Luke points out, once that data exists, it can be misused, whether by governments, bad actors, or anyone else who gains access to it. The Fourth Amendment exists to protect against unreasonable government surveillance and overreach, making this more than just a technology issue—it's a civil liberties issue. He also raises another concern that's often overlooked: the security of these systems themselves. If we're worried about foreign adversaries, why are we collecting and storing massive amounts of sensitive location and behavioral data on third-party servers in the first place? If those systems are vulnerable, that data doesn't just become a privacy risk, it can become a national security risk.

Bri Teresi

101,596 次观看 • 22 天前