Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Just 4 months ago, $NVDA CEO said quantum computers were 15 years away from broad use. Last week, he predicted that all supercomputers will have quantum accelerators with QPUs directly connected. Suddenly, inevitability feels closer -- & $IONQ may be first in line to benefit.

Shay Boloor

393,200 subscribers

192,696 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Finance Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

OffTheTicker1 year ago

Great analysis! Quantum computing is the future, with Rigetti Computing leading the way!

Nigam Arora1 year ago

FOR PRUDENT INVESTORS ONLY ChatGPT has unleashed the golden age of AI. Many investors will make a fortune from AI stocks. Get the list of 18 AI stocks to grab your share of the profits — no cost to you.

Crystal Parrish1 year ago

His unique analysis and insights gave me a new perspective.🎈 @_Jamie__Jackson. ♠️ 🎈 🤎 👌

Dawson Miller1 year ago

Could quantum computing companies like $IONQ eventually replace companies like $NVDA?

BSL1 year ago

He’s bound to say something dumb about quantum tomorrow and the market will believe him.

lifeisgood1 year ago

He said quantum computers meaning 100% quantum chips or system. Now hybrid systems yes they might have broad use in 10-15 years.

InfoGlutton1 year ago

I mean, everyone will follow the leader, if they're buying the leader if it's that significant.

Sensei 🔺1 year ago

Nvidia was always bullish on quantum. Many took what Jensen said out of context.

Yousuf Yaqoob Kolia1 year ago

$IONQ is the best Quantum play.

Tim1 year ago

Can’t wait til 2032 to find out if you are right!

Related Videos

BREAKING: JIM CRAMER JUST SAID LIVE ON CNBC THAT HE WILL SELL ALL HIS #BITCOIN DUE TO QUANTUM COMPUTERS IBM CEO TOLD HIM "YOU SHOULD BE PARANOID ABOUT IT IN 3-4 YEARS" "PEOPLE NEED TO TAKE THIS MAN SERIOUSLY" WE ARE OFFICIALLY SAVED 🔥

BREAKING: JIM CRAMER JUST SAID LIVE ON CNBC THAT HE WILL SELL ALL HIS #BITCOIN DUE TO QUANTUM COMPUTERS IBM CEO TOLD HIM "YOU SHOULD BE PARANOID ABOUT IT IN 3-4 YEARS" "PEOPLE NEED TO TAKE THIS MAN SERIOUSLY" WE ARE OFFICIALLY SAVED 🔥

The Bitcoin Historian

180,371 views • 1 month ago

Jim Cramer said last week he plans to sell all his Bitcoin over quantum-computing risks. The move follows $IBM CEO warning that “you should be paranoid about it in three to four years.”

Jim Cramer said last week he plans to sell all his Bitcoin over quantum-computing risks. The move follows $IBM CEO warning that “you should be paranoid about it in three to four years.”

Shay Boloor

143,350 views • 1 month ago

Jensen never changed his mind on Quantum! - "We are working with every quantum company in the world" - "15 years is on the early side, 30 years is a little late" - "Most of us settle on 20 years" $ionq $rgti $qubt $qbts He didn't change his entire view in a few months. He just doesn't want to crash the market and these companies stock price, like he did last time. He want's to see the industry progress and they earn $NVIDIA money! But the technology is still 15 - 20 years away.

Jensen never changed his mind on Quantum! - "We are working with every quantum company in the world" - "15 years is on the early side, 30 years is a little late" - "Most of us settle on 20 years" $ionq $rgti $qubt $qbts He didn't change his entire view in a few months. He just doesn't want to crash the market and these companies stock price, like he did last time. He want's to see the industry progress and they earn $NVIDIA money! But the technology is still 15 - 20 years away.

Common Sense Investor

302,529 views • 10 months ago

BREAKING: $RGTI CEO on Yahoo Finance this morning: “Sales don’t matter for us.” “3–5 years for quantum advantage.” “7–9 years for fault-tolerant quantum computers.” The reason the CEO can be honest is he sold all of his shares back in May! Translation: the CEO is openly saying there will be no meaningful commercial revenue for the better part of a decade. Investors are pricing a revenue story around quantum advantage being here and now that literally doesn’t exist yet. This stock is going to get crushed.

BREAKING: $RGTI CEO on Yahoo Finance this morning: “Sales don’t matter for us.” “3–5 years for quantum advantage.” “7–9 years for fault-tolerant quantum computers.” The reason the CEO can be honest is he sold all of his shares back in May! Translation: the CEO is openly saying there will be no meaningful commercial revenue for the better part of a decade. Investors are pricing a revenue story around quantum advantage being here and now that literally doesn’t exist yet. This stock is going to get crushed.

Common Sense Investor (CSI)

398,282 views • 10 months ago

$IonQ Quantum computing is officially out of the lab and driving real enterprise results! IonQ CEO Niccolo de Masi dropped massive updates on "Squawk on the Street" regarding recent acquisitions and new contracts. It’s clear: IonQ is at a "strategic and financial inflection point." Here are the key takeaways: 1/ Massive Financial Scaling IonQ is the first public quantum company to hit 9-figure revenue (tripling last year!), guiding toward a quarter-billion dollars this year " It's not a science experiment when we have... nine figures of revenue flowing in," says de Masi. The ultimate proof? 60% of their revenue is now commercial. 2/ Four Major 'World Quantum Day' Announcements IonQ just released industry-leading benchmarks focusing on the "cost to solution and time to solution". They also secured 3 massive contract wins: ✅ AFRL (Air Force Research Lab) IonQ constructs first networked quantum systems among remote quantum processing units. ✅ University of Maryland (UMD). ✅ DARPA for advanced quantum memory. 3/ Building the Future "Quantum Data Center " IonQ's tech stack goes far beyond base computing to include networking, security, and sensing. De Masi notes their tech is in all warfighting domains, "from submarines to up in the heavens in space". Why the heavy DARPA & AFRL investments? Because "they see the future for quantum data centers". The Bottom Line: Both government and commercial clients are realizing that working with the quantum ecosystem early gives them a massive competitive advantage. Full scoop 👇📹 #IonQ #QuantumComputing #DeepTech #DARPA #TechNews

$IonQ Quantum computing is officially out of the lab and driving real enterprise results! IonQ CEO Niccolo de Masi dropped massive updates on "Squawk on the Street" regarding recent acquisitions and new contracts. It’s clear: IonQ is at a "strategic and financial inflection point." Here are the key takeaways: 1/ Massive Financial Scaling IonQ is the first public quantum company to hit 9-figure revenue (tripling last year!), guiding toward a quarter-billion dollars this year " It's not a science experiment when we have... nine figures of revenue flowing in," says de Masi. The ultimate proof? 60% of their revenue is now commercial. 2/ Four Major 'World Quantum Day' Announcements IonQ just released industry-leading benchmarks focusing on the "cost to solution and time to solution". They also secured 3 massive contract wins: ✅ AFRL (Air Force Research Lab) IonQ constructs first networked quantum systems among remote quantum processing units. ✅ University of Maryland (UMD). ✅ DARPA for advanced quantum memory. 3/ Building the Future "Quantum Data Center " IonQ's tech stack goes far beyond base computing to include networking, security, and sensing. De Masi notes their tech is in all warfighting domains, "from submarines to up in the heavens in space". Why the heavy DARPA & AFRL investments? Because "they see the future for quantum data centers". The Bottom Line: Both government and commercial clients are realizing that working with the quantum ecosystem early gives them a massive competitive advantage. Full scoop 👇📹 #IonQ #QuantumComputing #DeepTech #DARPA #TechNews

TechInnovation

14,532 views • 4 months ago

DAN IVES JUST GAVE HIS TAKE ON WHERE THE QUANTUM COMPUTING RACE ACTUALLY STANDS The Wedbush analyst was asked what inning we're in. His answer: "We're maybe in the dugout in warmups, getting ready for the first inning. The game hasn't started." Ives calls quantum a "derivative play on AI" that will eventually become the next level pushing AI forward. He points to names like IonQ $IONQ and D-Wave $QBTS that he says have "phenomenal technologies" still building toward scale. He's most bullish on IBM $IBM, framing its quantum and AI bets as a real turnaround: "This is just the start of these turnarounds, and IBM continues to be one that has massive upside." He says CEO Arvind Krishna is "way underappreciated" for seeing where the technology is heading, putting him in the same tier as Jensen Huang. On the runway ahead, Ives pegs AI spending at $1 trillion over the next 3-4 years and says we're only 15%-20% through it. His bigger picture: "This is how we're going to get Nasdaq 30,000." Dan Ives

DAN IVES JUST GAVE HIS TAKE ON WHERE THE QUANTUM COMPUTING RACE ACTUALLY STANDS The Wedbush analyst was asked what inning we're in. His answer: "We're maybe in the dugout in warmups, getting ready for the first inning. The game hasn't started." Ives calls quantum a "derivative play on AI" that will eventually become the next level pushing AI forward. He points to names like IonQ $IONQ and D-Wave $QBTS that he says have "phenomenal technologies" still building toward scale. He's most bullish on IBM $IBM, framing its quantum and AI bets as a real turnaround: "This is just the start of these turnarounds, and IBM continues to be one that has massive upside." He says CEO Arvind Krishna is "way underappreciated" for seeing where the technology is heading, putting him in the same tier as Jensen Huang. On the runway ahead, Ives pegs AI spending at $1 trillion over the next 3-4 years and says we're only 15%-20% through it. His bigger picture: "This is how we're going to get Nasdaq 30,000." Dan Ives

WOLF

112,286 views • 3 months ago

🚨 Q-DAY IS COMING: QUANTUM DOOMSDAY WILL OBLITERATE ALL PRIVACY FOREVER — AND PEOPLE ARE PANICKING They call it Q-Day… but this is straight up digital Armageddon. The second quantum computers go live, they’ll shatter every encryption on Earth... your bank account, government IDs, DMs, medical files, military secrets. Everything exposed. No more privacy. No more secrets. Total transparency forced on the human race. Google + IBM are racing to roll out “useful” quantum machines by 2030. Google CEO Sundar Pichai just admitted quantum computing is already where AI was five years ago. Why is every dystopian breakthrough... total surveillance, brain implants, AI dominance... all hitting at the exact same time in 2030? Predictions from 60 years ago already marked this window. By then smartphones disappear. The plan is to put the tech directly inside our bodies. Coincidence? Or is this the script unfolding exactly as written?

🚨 Q-DAY IS COMING: QUANTUM DOOMSDAY WILL OBLITERATE ALL PRIVACY FOREVER — AND PEOPLE ARE PANICKING They call it Q-Day… but this is straight up digital Armageddon. The second quantum computers go live, they’ll shatter every encryption on Earth... your bank account, government IDs, DMs, medical files, military secrets. Everything exposed. No more privacy. No more secrets. Total transparency forced on the human race. Google + IBM are racing to roll out “useful” quantum machines by 2030. Google CEO Sundar Pichai just admitted quantum computing is already where AI was five years ago. Why is every dystopian breakthrough... total surveillance, brain implants, AI dominance... all hitting at the exact same time in 2030? Predictions from 60 years ago already marked this window. By then smartphones disappear. The plan is to put the tech directly inside our bodies. Coincidence? Or is this the script unfolding exactly as written?

HustleBitch

41,315 views • 2 months ago

Jim Cramer is selling his Bitcoin over quantum fears Honestly, this is not a dumb take from Cramer. It was the fact that quantum computing has officially entered mainstream conversations. Jim Cramer also said he’s planning to sell all his $BTC because of quantum risks. Then IBM’s CEO warned everyone to be paranoid about what’s coming in the next 3–4 years. Whether you agree with them or not isn’t the point. The point is this: If people are questioning whether tomorrow’s computers can break today’s cryptography… Why are we still trusting today’s privacy tools to protect tomorrow’s data? That’s exactly why I’ve been following what QVPN is building. Unlike traditional VPNs that mainly hide your IP, QVPN is being built with quantum-safe protection on top of DIAM’s blockchain infrastructure. Most people won’t care until it’s too late. I’d rather prepare before everyone else starts asking the same questions. If quantum ends up changing cybersecurity the way AI changed software, the projects building for that future today will matter the most. Join QVPN Genesis and mine $SHHH 🔗 #Quantum

Jim Cramer is selling his Bitcoin over quantum fears Honestly, this is not a dumb take from Cramer. It was the fact that quantum computing has officially entered mainstream conversations. Jim Cramer also said he’s planning to sell all his $BTC because of quantum risks. Then IBM’s CEO warned everyone to be paranoid about what’s coming in the next 3–4 years. Whether you agree with them or not isn’t the point. The point is this: If people are questioning whether tomorrow’s computers can break today’s cryptography… Why are we still trusting today’s privacy tools to protect tomorrow’s data? That’s exactly why I’ve been following what QVPN is building. Unlike traditional VPNs that mainly hide your IP, QVPN is being built with quantum-safe protection on top of DIAM’s blockchain infrastructure. Most people won’t care until it’s too late. I’d rather prepare before everyone else starts asking the same questions. If quantum ends up changing cybersecurity the way AI changed software, the projects building for that future today will matter the most. Join QVPN Genesis and mine $SHHH 🔗 #Quantum

Aein

18,529 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO TO WATCH IF YOU ARE INVESTED IN QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANIES. $IONQ $RGTI $QBTS $QUBT The world's leading quantum computing researcher Scott Aaronson calls out the scams and snakeoilmen in the public quantum computing stock market. $IONQ $RGTI $QBTS $QUBT - "The most important thing that I can say in this whole interview, if I am taking to Retail investors is that unfortunately there are companies that I see that are really trying to solve the hardware problems, they might succeed, they might fail but they are really focused on solving the real problems and talking about it more or less honestly" - "and then there are companies that have focused on like marketing themselves to Retail investors and doing IPO's" i.e. the 4 public quantum computing companies IONQ, Rigetti, D-Wave and QUBT. - "and I see these 2 sets of companies being mostly disjoint from each other" - "So the companies that have focused on doing IPO's are actually not the ones that are in the lead on in the hardware, what they are in the lead on is selling a narrative to people...... - "convincing people this is already useful for solving problems in optimization and machine learning and finance, which sounds great to people, but all depends on you agreeing to not ask the question Q. well could a classical computer have done that just as well, could a classical computer actually have done that much faster and easier " "When people are talking about that the big use of a quantum computer is to solve optimization or machine learning problems or to turbo charge AI, or it can already do this, it's already delivering value to customers...." "these are the tells you are dealing with a SNAKEOIL SALESMAN" He calls out the "scammy" companies in this space! Remember the only 4 quantum pure play companies that have IPO'd are $IONQ $RGTI $QUBT $QBTS He also says earlier in the interview “I would say $IONQ has not demonstrated anything in trapped ion hardware close to what Quantinuum has demonstrated in the last year” YOU ARE BEING LIED TO! Full video in comments from the The Quantum Bull

BREAKING: THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO TO WATCH IF YOU ARE INVESTED IN QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANIES. $IONQ $RGTI $QBTS $QUBT The world's leading quantum computing researcher Scott Aaronson calls out the scams and snakeoilmen in the public quantum computing stock market. $IONQ $RGTI $QBTS $QUBT - "The most important thing that I can say in this whole interview, if I am taking to Retail investors is that unfortunately there are companies that I see that are really trying to solve the hardware problems, they might succeed, they might fail but they are really focused on solving the real problems and talking about it more or less honestly" - "and then there are companies that have focused on like marketing themselves to Retail investors and doing IPO's" i.e. the 4 public quantum computing companies IONQ, Rigetti, D-Wave and QUBT. - "and I see these 2 sets of companies being mostly disjoint from each other" - "So the companies that have focused on doing IPO's are actually not the ones that are in the lead on in the hardware, what they are in the lead on is selling a narrative to people...... - "convincing people this is already useful for solving problems in optimization and machine learning and finance, which sounds great to people, but all depends on you agreeing to not ask the question Q. well could a classical computer have done that just as well, could a classical computer actually have done that much faster and easier " "When people are talking about that the big use of a quantum computer is to solve optimization or machine learning problems or to turbo charge AI, or it can already do this, it's already delivering value to customers...." "these are the tells you are dealing with a SNAKEOIL SALESMAN" He calls out the "scammy" companies in this space! Remember the only 4 quantum pure play companies that have IPO'd are $IONQ $RGTI $QUBT $QBTS He also says earlier in the interview “I would say $IONQ has not demonstrated anything in trapped ion hardware close to what Quantinuum has demonstrated in the last year” YOU ARE BEING LIED TO! Full video in comments from the The Quantum Bull

Common Sense Investor (CSI)

140,077 views • 8 months ago

BREAKING! The very first - and most important – question on $IONQ ’s earnings call today came from Quinn Bolton at Needham (audio below): “How much of your revenue came from your core Quantum Computing business vs. how much came from the other security / sensing / networking businesses?” A simple, direct question. Instead of answering it, the CFO spent 5 minutes rambling about “quantum security,” “momentum,” GPS spoofing, atomic clocks, and “opening doors.” Then he ended with: “So yes, to answer your question directly – we’ve got great momentum, we’ll have the most qubits next year and in five years from now.” He dodged the MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION! Why? Because without the acquisitions (ID Quantique, Capella, Vector Atomic), IONQ’s core quantum computing revenue would be declining! And that matters because: IONQ’s entire valuation is based on the theoretical TAM of quantum computing. If that core segment isn’t actually growing – the stock’s narrative collapses.

BREAKING! The very first - and most important – question on $IONQ ’s earnings call today came from Quinn Bolton at Needham (audio below): “How much of your revenue came from your core Quantum Computing business vs. how much came from the other security / sensing / networking businesses?” A simple, direct question. Instead of answering it, the CFO spent 5 minutes rambling about “quantum security,” “momentum,” GPS spoofing, atomic clocks, and “opening doors.” Then he ended with: “So yes, to answer your question directly – we’ve got great momentum, we’ll have the most qubits next year and in five years from now.” He dodged the MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION! Why? Because without the acquisitions (ID Quantique, Capella, Vector Atomic), IONQ’s core quantum computing revenue would be declining! And that matters because: IONQ’s entire valuation is based on the theoretical TAM of quantum computing. If that core segment isn’t actually growing – the stock’s narrative collapses.

Common Sense Investor (CSI)

115,549 views • 10 months ago

🚨 QUANTUM COMPUTING: THE NEXT TECH GOLD RUSH Quantum computing (QC) is about to blow up the tech world. Think of it as AI on steroids—but here’s the kicker: the entire U.S. quantum sector is worth less than Dogecoin. Imagine buying Bitcoin at $500. That’s where QC is today. Regular computers process in 1s and 0s. QCs use qubits, which can be 1, 0, or both at the same time (superposition). Translation? They solve ridiculously complex problems insanely fast. Google recently ran a calculation on its quantum chip in 5 minutes that would take the world’s fastest supercomputer 10 septillion years to complete. Yes, that’s older than the universe. Why it matters: QC isn’t just a cool science project—it’s a game-changer: Medicine: Design drugs in weeks, not years. Finance: Smarter investments, faster decisions. AI: Supercharges AI, making today’s breakthroughs look tiny. McKinsey predicts QC will add trillions to the economy in the next decade. Entire industries will be rewritten. We are closer than most people think. Quantum startups are already hitting 10 qubits, aiming for 100 in 2 years and thousands in 5 years. QC is already solving real problems in medicine, defense, and finance, and platforms like AWS and Google let you rent quantum power right now. Here’s the wild part: the entire U.S. quantum sector is trading for less than a meme coin. Meanwhile, China is outspending the U.S. 5 to 1 in quantum development. Legislation like the Quantum Leadership Act is injecting billions into R&D, but QC’s “ChatGPT moment”—where its potential becomes undeniable—is just 2-3 years away. The upside here is massive. QC isn’t just going to change industries—it’s going to flip them on their heads. When its moment comes, the repricing will be fast and brutal. The clock is ticking. Source: Charles Edwards

🚨 QUANTUM COMPUTING: THE NEXT TECH GOLD RUSH Quantum computing (QC) is about to blow up the tech world. Think of it as AI on steroids—but here’s the kicker: the entire U.S. quantum sector is worth less than Dogecoin. Imagine buying Bitcoin at $500. That’s where QC is today. Regular computers process in 1s and 0s. QCs use qubits, which can be 1, 0, or both at the same time (superposition). Translation? They solve ridiculously complex problems insanely fast. Google recently ran a calculation on its quantum chip in 5 minutes that would take the world’s fastest supercomputer 10 septillion years to complete. Yes, that’s older than the universe. Why it matters: QC isn’t just a cool science project—it’s a game-changer: Medicine: Design drugs in weeks, not years. Finance: Smarter investments, faster decisions. AI: Supercharges AI, making today’s breakthroughs look tiny. McKinsey predicts QC will add trillions to the economy in the next decade. Entire industries will be rewritten. We are closer than most people think. Quantum startups are already hitting 10 qubits, aiming for 100 in 2 years and thousands in 5 years. QC is already solving real problems in medicine, defense, and finance, and platforms like AWS and Google let you rent quantum power right now. Here’s the wild part: the entire U.S. quantum sector is trading for less than a meme coin. Meanwhile, China is outspending the U.S. 5 to 1 in quantum development. Legislation like the Quantum Leadership Act is injecting billions into R&D, but QC’s “ChatGPT moment”—where its potential becomes undeniable—is just 2-3 years away. The upside here is massive. QC isn’t just going to change industries—it’s going to flip them on their heads. When its moment comes, the repricing will be fast and brutal. The clock is ticking. Source: Charles Edwards

Mario Nawfal

1,870,630 views • 1 year ago

$IONQ "The world still massively underestimates just how disruptive it's going to be." Chris Ballance IonQ President of Quantum Computing laid out the whole picture with Kearney's Brent Smolinski. Start to finish: What it is → Quantum computers run on quantum physics, not classical logic - for Ballance, the most powerful form of computing the laws of physics allow. They solve in minutes what a classical machine couldn't crack in the lifetime of the universe. Where we are → "The end of the beginning." Real systems exist, you can buy one from IonQ today, and the field is speed-running the computing revolution. The race now: who scales the best platform the fastest. The value comes in three eras → - Early: problems classical can't touch - chemistry & drug discovery (with AstraZeneca), crash-analysis simulation (with Ansys). - Middle: familiar work, but faster, better or far less energy - AI fine-tuning, most likely hybrid: a GPU farm and a quantum computer side by side, more than the sum of their parts. - Late: unknown. The killer applications are never the ones you expect. Quantum advantage → Not a benchmark stunt - a better solution per dollar invested in quantum than classical. Hard to spot, but already real for certain early problems. The economics → His sharpest line: compute is now just a markup on electricity. With a fixed budget, the question is classical or quantum - and some of the first quantum wins won't be faster, just orders of magnitude cheaper. The architectures → Superconducting (IBM, Google): first-mover lead and standard chip fabs - but chips chilled to a thousandth of a degree above absolute zero, huge energy-hungry refrigeration, and a quantum chip "three orders of magnitude harder" than Intel's toughest. It loses coherence fast, too: many redundant qubits, far bigger machines. Trapped ions (IonQ): individual atoms - and an atom is "guaranteed perfect across the universe." No fab variation, far lower error rates, no exotic cooling. The atoms are run by an ordinary classical chip, so IonQ rides the trillion-dollar semiconductor industry instead of inventing a quantum chip. (Oxford Ionics' Electronic Qubit Control, SkyWater foundry) Why it's green → A future million-qubit machine is about a dozen racks drawing minuscule power - orders of magnitude less than a large AI data center. Classical can still gain 10–100×, but not the orders of magnitude quantum unlocks. His call: within ~10 years, some 100-megawatt NVIDIA clusters could sit vacant. Quick-fire → - Most over-hyped: changing biology. - Most underestimated risk: integrating into real customer workflows. - First to adopt: finance ) portfolio analysis & fraud prevention. - Most exciting: the speed of change over the next 24 months. The personal why → What gets him out of bed: reinventing how we think about computation and the belief that the world still underestimates how disruptive this will be. For leaders → Quantum computing is here now. Adopting any new tech takes 2-3 years, so the moment to start isn't next year it's now, so you're ready when the hardware lands. Full conversation below ↓ $IONQ #IonQ #Quantum

$IONQ "The world still massively underestimates just how disruptive it's going to be." Chris Ballance IonQ President of Quantum Computing laid out the whole picture with Kearney's Brent Smolinski. Start to finish: What it is → Quantum computers run on quantum physics, not classical logic - for Ballance, the most powerful form of computing the laws of physics allow. They solve in minutes what a classical machine couldn't crack in the lifetime of the universe. Where we are → "The end of the beginning." Real systems exist, you can buy one from IonQ today, and the field is speed-running the computing revolution. The race now: who scales the best platform the fastest. The value comes in three eras → - Early: problems classical can't touch - chemistry & drug discovery (with AstraZeneca), crash-analysis simulation (with Ansys). - Middle: familiar work, but faster, better or far less energy - AI fine-tuning, most likely hybrid: a GPU farm and a quantum computer side by side, more than the sum of their parts. - Late: unknown. The killer applications are never the ones you expect. Quantum advantage → Not a benchmark stunt - a better solution per dollar invested in quantum than classical. Hard to spot, but already real for certain early problems. The economics → His sharpest line: compute is now just a markup on electricity. With a fixed budget, the question is classical or quantum - and some of the first quantum wins won't be faster, just orders of magnitude cheaper. The architectures → Superconducting (IBM, Google): first-mover lead and standard chip fabs - but chips chilled to a thousandth of a degree above absolute zero, huge energy-hungry refrigeration, and a quantum chip "three orders of magnitude harder" than Intel's toughest. It loses coherence fast, too: many redundant qubits, far bigger machines. Trapped ions (IonQ): individual atoms - and an atom is "guaranteed perfect across the universe." No fab variation, far lower error rates, no exotic cooling. The atoms are run by an ordinary classical chip, so IonQ rides the trillion-dollar semiconductor industry instead of inventing a quantum chip. (Oxford Ionics' Electronic Qubit Control, SkyWater foundry) Why it's green → A future million-qubit machine is about a dozen racks drawing minuscule power - orders of magnitude less than a large AI data center. Classical can still gain 10–100×, but not the orders of magnitude quantum unlocks. His call: within ~10 years, some 100-megawatt NVIDIA clusters could sit vacant. Quick-fire → - Most over-hyped: changing biology. - Most underestimated risk: integrating into real customer workflows. - First to adopt: finance ) portfolio analysis & fraud prevention. - Most exciting: the speed of change over the next 24 months. The personal why → What gets him out of bed: reinventing how we think about computation and the belief that the world still underestimates how disruptive this will be. For leaders → Quantum computing is here now. Adopting any new tech takes 2-3 years, so the moment to start isn't next year it's now, so you're ready when the hardware lands. Full conversation below ↓ $IONQ #IonQ #Quantum

TechInnovation

26,084 views • 2 months ago

𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘁𝘂𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀: 𝗔 𝗚𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗽𝘀𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆? Researchers may have just found quantum superpowers in microtubules. Yes, you read that right—quantum *superradiance* in the brain! Superradiance is a phenomenon where excited particles behave like a team, emitting photons collectively in a bright, ultra-fast burst. This is different from normal fluorescence, where photons are emitted slowly and individually. Imagine a synchronized light show on a quantum scale. The key ingredient? Quantum entanglement. If particles are spaced closer than the wavelength of incoming light, they form a collective quantum state. This allows them to act as one entity, amplifying energy release, just like a laser—but smaller in scale. The study zeroed in on tryptophan molecules inside microtubules. When hit with UV light, they emitted much more energy than regular fluorescence could explain—100 times more, to be exact. The researchers believe this can only happen through superradiance, implying large-scale quantum entanglement. If true, this discovery could be huge. It may hint that quantum effects play a bigger role in biology—and even in brain function—than we ever imagined. Could Penrose and the quantum brain theory be right after all? This clip is from "𝗪𝗮𝘀 𝗣𝗲𝗻𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁? 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗜𝗻 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻" (PBS Space Time, YouTube, Jul 25, 2024)

𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘁𝘂𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀: 𝗔 𝗚𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗽𝘀𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆? Researchers may have just found quantum superpowers in microtubules. Yes, you read that right—quantum superradiance in the brain! Superradiance is a phenomenon where excited particles behave like a team, emitting photons collectively in a bright, ultra-fast burst. This is different from normal fluorescence, where photons are emitted slowly and individually. Imagine a synchronized light show on a quantum scale. The key ingredient? Quantum entanglement. If particles are spaced closer than the wavelength of incoming light, they form a collective quantum state. This allows them to act as one entity, amplifying energy release, just like a laser—but smaller in scale. The study zeroed in on tryptophan molecules inside microtubules. When hit with UV light, they emitted much more energy than regular fluorescence could explain—100 times more, to be exact. The researchers believe this can only happen through superradiance, implying large-scale quantum entanglement. If true, this discovery could be huge. It may hint that quantum effects play a bigger role in biology—and even in brain function—than we ever imagined. Could Penrose and the quantum brain theory be right after all? This clip is from "𝗪𝗮𝘀 𝗣𝗲𝗻𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁? 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗜𝗻 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻" (PBS Space Time, YouTube, Jul 25, 2024)

Ultra Skool 🧠

18,906 views • 1 year ago

6,100-Qubit Processor Shatters Quantum Computing Record | David Nield, ScienceAlert Another major quantum computing record has been broken, and by a considerable margin: physicists have now built an array containing 6,100 qubits, the largest of its type and way above the thousand or so qubits previous systems contained. It's the work of scientists from the California Institute of Technology, who used cesium atoms as their qubits, trapping them in place with a complex system of lasers that acted as tweezers to keep the atoms as stable as possible. Qubits differ from the classical bits of traditional computers by exploiting what's known as a superposition: not just binary states of 1 or 0, but a spread of probabilities that allows for algorithms that can solve problems considered out of reach of conventional computing methods. Related: Quantum Advantage: A Physicist Explains The Future of Computers A lot of qubits will be needed to make quantum algorithms practical, however. One reason for these large arrays is error correction, which helps overcome the inherent fragility of the qubit by providing a surplus to double-check the machine's operation. "This is an exciting moment for neutral-atom quantum computing," says physicist Manuel Endres. "We can now see a pathway to large error-corrected quantum computers. The building blocks are in place." There was no single breakthrough that enabled this jump in qubit numbers, but rather a series of engineering advancements in many key areas – from the laser tweezers to the ultra-high (very low pressure) vacuum chamber. Stability has also been a problem for quantum computing systems. The innovations in this latest array kept qubits in a superposition state for almost 13 seconds – almost ten times longer than previous configurations had managed. What's more, individual qubits could be manipulated with 99.98 percent accuracy, establishing a significant benchmark in the programmability of quantum technology. "Large scale, with more atoms, is often thought to come at the expense of accuracy, but our results show that we can do both," says physicist Gyohei Nomura. "Qubits aren't useful without quality. Now we have quantity and quality." To make quantum computers a practical alternative to modern supercomputers, more qubits and even greater levels of stability will be required. Experts are tackling the problem from several different angles, which is why records for some types of quantum computer don't necessarily apply to others. Next, the researchers need to work on exploiting entanglement, which will enable the system to make the leap from storing information to actually processing it. Not too far in the future, we could be using these computers to discover new materials, matter, and fundamental laws of physics. "It's exciting that we are creating machines to help us learn about the Universe in ways that only quantum mechanics can teach us," says physicist Hannah Manetsch. Read more:

6,100-Qubit Processor Shatters Quantum Computing Record | David Nield, ScienceAlert Another major quantum computing record has been broken, and by a considerable margin: physicists have now built an array containing 6,100 qubits, the largest of its type and way above the thousand or so qubits previous systems contained. It's the work of scientists from the California Institute of Technology, who used cesium atoms as their qubits, trapping them in place with a complex system of lasers that acted as tweezers to keep the atoms as stable as possible. Qubits differ from the classical bits of traditional computers by exploiting what's known as a superposition: not just binary states of 1 or 0, but a spread of probabilities that allows for algorithms that can solve problems considered out of reach of conventional computing methods. Related: Quantum Advantage: A Physicist Explains The Future of Computers A lot of qubits will be needed to make quantum algorithms practical, however. One reason for these large arrays is error correction, which helps overcome the inherent fragility of the qubit by providing a surplus to double-check the machine's operation. "This is an exciting moment for neutral-atom quantum computing," says physicist Manuel Endres. "We can now see a pathway to large error-corrected quantum computers. The building blocks are in place." There was no single breakthrough that enabled this jump in qubit numbers, but rather a series of engineering advancements in many key areas – from the laser tweezers to the ultra-high (very low pressure) vacuum chamber. Stability has also been a problem for quantum computing systems. The innovations in this latest array kept qubits in a superposition state for almost 13 seconds – almost ten times longer than previous configurations had managed. What's more, individual qubits could be manipulated with 99.98 percent accuracy, establishing a significant benchmark in the programmability of quantum technology. "Large scale, with more atoms, is often thought to come at the expense of accuracy, but our results show that we can do both," says physicist Gyohei Nomura. "Qubits aren't useful without quality. Now we have quantity and quality." To make quantum computers a practical alternative to modern supercomputers, more qubits and even greater levels of stability will be required. Experts are tackling the problem from several different angles, which is why records for some types of quantum computer don't necessarily apply to others. Next, the researchers need to work on exploiting entanglement, which will enable the system to make the leap from storing information to actually processing it. Not too far in the future, we could be using these computers to discover new materials, matter, and fundamental laws of physics. "It's exciting that we are creating machines to help us learn about the Universe in ways that only quantum mechanics can teach us," says physicist Hannah Manetsch. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

45,324 views • 11 months ago

Bitcoin Rails x MARA Foundation presents: THE POLITICS OF POST-QUANTUM BITCOIN | with Nic Carter 🔗 YouTube: 🌿Spotify: Less than nine months ago, investor and researcher nic carter sparked one of the most heated debates in Bitcoin's recent history — when he published a series of essays arguing that the network should prepare for its post-quantum transition sooner rather than later. While the essays broadly persuaded investors and institutions, many of Bitcoin's technical leaders dismissed them as alarmist — that is, until Google's quantum resource estimates were updated just a few months later. Crediting Google's paper with "shifting the Overton Window" on quantum and strengthening the case for post-quantum preparation, Nic shares his thoughts on the delicate politics surrounding this transition — and how he believes a quantum attack and response could potentially play out in practice. In more detail, this special episode of Bitcoin Rails X MARA Foundation TV covers: - How a quantum attack could realistically unfold + the different ways stakeholder groups might respond - The constitutional tensions surfaced by quantum vulnerable coins and how incentives will ultimately dictate outcomes - How a state actor could facilitate "benevolent" quantum recovery and eliminate the need for a contentious fork - The role and influence of institutional investors as key players in quantum outcomes - How Bitcoin's post-quantum transition could permanently reshape Bitcoin’s governance structures ...or build them from the ground up TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 00:18 — Nick's path from Fidelity to founding Castle Island 07:00 — How quantum went from FUD to Nick's biggest concern 12:45 — Why Core devs refuse to be accountable 26:09 — Investors vs developers: who took quantum seriously first 32:33 — Bitcoin's "pre-constitutional" governance problem 39:18 — Satoshi's coins: liquidate, burn, slow-bleed, or let the government take them 47:36 — Why there will never be another Bitcoin fork war 01:01:35 — Bitcoin is about to choose the wrong signature scheme 01:09:42 — The actual deadline: why PQ signatures need to ship in 2026 01:13:09 — The happy path, the coup, and why Bitcoin won't die

Bitcoin Rails x MARA Foundation presents: THE POLITICS OF POST-QUANTUM BITCOIN | with Nic Carter 🔗 YouTube: 🌿Spotify: Less than nine months ago, investor and researcher nic carter sparked one of the most heated debates in Bitcoin's recent history — when he published a series of essays arguing that the network should prepare for its post-quantum transition sooner rather than later. While the essays broadly persuaded investors and institutions, many of Bitcoin's technical leaders dismissed them as alarmist — that is, until Google's quantum resource estimates were updated just a few months later. Crediting Google's paper with "shifting the Overton Window" on quantum and strengthening the case for post-quantum preparation, Nic shares his thoughts on the delicate politics surrounding this transition — and how he believes a quantum attack and response could potentially play out in practice. In more detail, this special episode of Bitcoin Rails X MARA Foundation TV covers: - How a quantum attack could realistically unfold + the different ways stakeholder groups might respond - The constitutional tensions surfaced by quantum vulnerable coins and how incentives will ultimately dictate outcomes - How a state actor could facilitate "benevolent" quantum recovery and eliminate the need for a contentious fork - The role and influence of institutional investors as key players in quantum outcomes - How Bitcoin's post-quantum transition could permanently reshape Bitcoin’s governance structures ...or build them from the ground up TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 00:18 — Nick's path from Fidelity to founding Castle Island 07:00 — How quantum went from FUD to Nick's biggest concern 12:45 — Why Core devs refuse to be accountable 26:09 — Investors vs developers: who took quantum seriously first 32:33 — Bitcoin's "pre-constitutional" governance problem 39:18 — Satoshi's coins: liquidate, burn, slow-bleed, or let the government take them 47:36 — Why there will never be another Bitcoin fork war 01:01:35 — Bitcoin is about to choose the wrong signature scheme 01:09:42 — The actual deadline: why PQ signatures need to ship in 2026 01:13:09 — The happy path, the coup, and why Bitcoin won't die

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

51,026 views • 2 months ago

Continual Learning in 2026. And AGI with it? In July, Dario said he believes Continual Learning will turn out to be not as difficult as it seems. Sholto Douglas, Anthropic and former Deepmind researcher, predicted Continual Learning gets solved in a satisfying way in 2026. Sholto said that last week. Considering how capable AI models have become in 2025, it is unwise to dismiss this as fundraising or hype. It is much wiser to assume AGI is coming. That it will change the world. And that you can benefit from it... ...than it is to assume the opposite. "Not enough people are ready for AI to not be a bubble." - roon Choose wisely my friends.

Continual Learning in 2026. And AGI with it? In July, Dario said he believes Continual Learning will turn out to be not as difficult as it seems. Sholto Douglas, Anthropic and former Deepmind researcher, predicted Continual Learning gets solved in a satisfying way in 2026. Sholto said that last week. Considering how capable AI models have become in 2025, it is unwise to dismiss this as fundraising or hype. It is much wiser to assume AGI is coming. That it will change the world. And that you can benefit from it... ...than it is to assume the opposite. "Not enough people are ready for AI to not be a bubble." - roon Choose wisely my friends.

Dan McAteer

69,496 views • 8 months ago

got to be part of something really special with this one. almost 1.5 years in the making, MARTIN GARRIX and Arijit Singh dropped their first collab last week, the opening track from a 4-track EP. it all started back in 2023 when arijit mentioned on _TheMusicPodcast_ that he’d love to work with martijn. 𝗡𝗲𝗲𝗺𝘇 sent me the clip, we passed it along to martijn and he immediately showed love. the teams connected, and a few months later they were in amsterdam jamming and building something incredible. forever thankful to martin for being so kind and involved from day one. he didn’t just run with it, he kept us in the loop throughout. from sharing early demos and hopping on calls to catch up, to playing us versions in person during his short india visits and asking for feedback, he truly made us feel part of the journey. grateful to see it all come to life like this. surreal ❤️

got to be part of something really special with this one. almost 1.5 years in the making, MARTIN GARRIX and Arijit Singh dropped their first collab last week, the opening track from a 4-track EP. it all started back in 2023 when arijit mentioned on _TheMusicPodcast_ that he’d love to work with martijn. 𝗡𝗲𝗲𝗺𝘇 sent me the clip, we passed it along to martijn and he immediately showed love. the teams connected, and a few months later they were in amsterdam jamming and building something incredible. forever thankful to martin for being so kind and involved from day one. he didn’t just run with it, he kept us in the loop throughout. from sharing early demos and hopping on calls to catch up, to playing us versions in person during his short india visits and asking for feedback, he truly made us feel part of the journey. grateful to see it all come to life like this. surreal ❤️

Samarth

11,160 views • 1 year ago

Ford CEO Jim Farley in a recent interview with LA Times: “4-5 years ago we dissected a Tesla and a BYD. It became very clear that our first generation EV’s like Mach-E, and F-150 Lightning were just not going to be competitive so we created a small group in Irvine—none of them came from Ford. They were tasked with coming up with an affordable EV for Americans to compete with what we thought would be the standard; which is Tesla and BYD.”

Ford CEO Jim Farley in a recent interview with LA Times: “4-5 years ago we dissected a Tesla and a BYD. It became very clear that our first generation EV’s like Mach-E, and F-150 Lightning were just not going to be competitive so we created a small group in Irvine—none of them came from Ford. They were tasked with coming up with an affordable EV for Americans to compete with what we thought would be the standard; which is Tesla and BYD.”

Nic Cruz Patane

241,589 views • 5 months ago

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #18: MAKE BITCOIN QUANTUM RESISTANT | with BIP360 author Hunter Beast Hunter Beast 🕯️ Quantum computing is a complicated topic—one that incites equal amounts of fear and skepticism depending on who you talk to… especially in Bitcoin. In this episode, BIP360 author Hunter Beast wisely shares why the “truth is likely somewhere in the middle,” citing incremental advancements in quantum computing that may eventually pose a legitimate threat to some Bitcoin addresses—as well as steps we can take to protect ourselves in the short, medium and long term. The correct posture is to “be prepared, not scared,” says Hunter Beast 🕯️ Ultimately, the introduction of quantum resistant cryptography—via proposals like BIP360—will be needed for higher degrees of security. That said, individuals can mitigate personal risk substantially through proper address-use hygiene. This episode breaks down the specific challenges Bitcoin will face in the event of a quantum attack, the likelihood of an attack over time, and the steps we’ll need to take at the individual and communal level to ensure Bitcoin’s safety. This episode includes detailed discussion of: 1) How quantum computing could potentially affect Bitcoin public/private key cryptography—and technologies built on vulnerable addresses (e.g. Taproot) 2) Best practices for protecting yourself against quantum in the short and long term 3) Implications of vulnerable address types—e.g. what about Satoshi’s coins? 4) Deep Dive into BIP360 + proposed long-term solutions 5) Industry roadmaps for quantum computing + how banks and governments are preparing for “Q Day” As always, this episode can be viewed on Spotify or YouTuve—full episode in the comments or linktree in my bio. This episode is powered by Best In Slot—the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 02:05 What is quantum computing? 04:30 How could quantum threaten your Bitcoin wallet? 06:50 Addresses that are safe from quantum 09:13 Satoshi’s coins are in danger! 11:25 What happens if Satoshi’s coins are touched? 14:45 Do we softfork to shield Satoshi’s coins? 16:38 “Transitory inflation” for bitcoin after quantum 21:05 Why Taproot addresses are vulnerable 23:50 Do NOT reuse your Bitcoin addresses! 26:03 When will Quantum become a threat? 28:34 The long/short exposure attack; explained 31:45 Protection using private mempools 33:20 Why all the new Bitcoin L2s are in danger 37:45 Quantum is 5 to 10 years away, governments fear 40:34 Non-Bitcoin systems threatened by quantum 42:26 Centralized systems can adapt to quantum 43:50 Hunter’s BIP: Post quantum cryptography in Bitcoin 47:40 Hunter’s three new signature algorithms 53:48 Is new cryptography on Bitcoin risky? 56:33 Why not just stick to hash-based cryptography? 58:49 A 16X discount for quantum resistant addresses? 01:02:30 Creating quantum resistant multisig addresses 01:04:00 What is Frost? 01:06:50 The long process of approving a BIP 01:08:30 What developers think of Hunter’s BIP 01:10:00 Matt Corallo’s concerns with Hunter’s approach 01:11:00 Steps to implementing the BIP 360 01:17:00 Where to learn more about BIP 360 01:17:50 Who can push the button to change Bitcoin?

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #18: MAKE BITCOIN QUANTUM RESISTANT | with BIP360 author Hunter Beast Hunter Beast 🕯️ Quantum computing is a complicated topic—one that incites equal amounts of fear and skepticism depending on who you talk to… especially in Bitcoin. In this episode, BIP360 author Hunter Beast wisely shares why the “truth is likely somewhere in the middle,” citing incremental advancements in quantum computing that may eventually pose a legitimate threat to some Bitcoin addresses—as well as steps we can take to protect ourselves in the short, medium and long term. The correct posture is to “be prepared, not scared,” says Hunter Beast 🕯️ Ultimately, the introduction of quantum resistant cryptography—via proposals like BIP360—will be needed for higher degrees of security. That said, individuals can mitigate personal risk substantially through proper address-use hygiene. This episode breaks down the specific challenges Bitcoin will face in the event of a quantum attack, the likelihood of an attack over time, and the steps we’ll need to take at the individual and communal level to ensure Bitcoin’s safety. This episode includes detailed discussion of: 1) How quantum computing could potentially affect Bitcoin public/private key cryptography—and technologies built on vulnerable addresses (e.g. Taproot) 2) Best practices for protecting yourself against quantum in the short and long term 3) Implications of vulnerable address types—e.g. what about Satoshi’s coins? 4) Deep Dive into BIP360 + proposed long-term solutions 5) Industry roadmaps for quantum computing + how banks and governments are preparing for “Q Day” As always, this episode can be viewed on Spotify or YouTuve—full episode in the comments or linktree in my bio. This episode is powered by Best In Slot—the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 02:05 What is quantum computing? 04:30 How could quantum threaten your Bitcoin wallet? 06:50 Addresses that are safe from quantum 09:13 Satoshi’s coins are in danger! 11:25 What happens if Satoshi’s coins are touched? 14:45 Do we softfork to shield Satoshi’s coins? 16:38 “Transitory inflation” for bitcoin after quantum 21:05 Why Taproot addresses are vulnerable 23:50 Do NOT reuse your Bitcoin addresses! 26:03 When will Quantum become a threat? 28:34 The long/short exposure attack; explained 31:45 Protection using private mempools 33:20 Why all the new Bitcoin L2s are in danger 37:45 Quantum is 5 to 10 years away, governments fear 40:34 Non-Bitcoin systems threatened by quantum 42:26 Centralized systems can adapt to quantum 43:50 Hunter’s BIP: Post quantum cryptography in Bitcoin 47:40 Hunter’s three new signature algorithms 53:48 Is new cryptography on Bitcoin risky? 56:33 Why not just stick to hash-based cryptography? 58:49 A 16X discount for quantum resistant addresses? 01:02:30 Creating quantum resistant multisig addresses 01:04:00 What is Frost? 01:06:50 The long process of approving a BIP 01:08:30 What developers think of Hunter’s BIP 01:10:00 Matt Corallo’s concerns with Hunter’s approach 01:11:00 Steps to implementing the BIP 360 01:17:00 Where to learn more about BIP 360 01:17:50 Who can push the button to change Bitcoin?

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

31,148 views • 1 year ago