Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Just on with Tom Swarbrick, talking donations - my main point is ban all donations and state fund - it’ll cost a packet of crisps each per year to do this - super low cost to clean up politics completely, once and for all. Take away the suspicion and...

26,010 просмотров • 18 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 34

Фото профиля Terry Dacteeele
Terry Dacteeele18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 You don’t want to talk about how well you’ve done out of politics do you. Hilarious

Фото профиля reillypeedoff
reillypeedoff18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 How big was your contract the dale ?

Фото профиля Owen Kent
Owen Kent18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Why are you such hypocrites?

Фото профиля Paul Hutchinson
Paul Hutchinson18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Coincidentally and in no way shape or form related, a git big massive contract. But obviously in no way related your honour.

Фото профиля Edmundd
Edmundd18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 How are you going to get your lucrative government contracts then Dale if you do that?

Фото профиля Ciara ☺️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇮🇪
Ciara ☺️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇮🇪18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 People think something is wanted in return because that’s what you got.

Фото профиля Jonny Blundra
Jonny Blundra18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Oh piss off. The left suddenly wanting to make a case to clean up politics because a party on the right is looking to be in a much stronger position to challenge for government. Typical lefty playbook.

Фото профиля karyn vernon
karyn vernon18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Then no new parties will be allowed to form.

Фото профиля Edmundd
Edmundd18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 So you've argued we shouldn't have this system but you used it anyway because it's there. Not great moral high ground that Dale. You used it. End of. You're a part of it so stop complaining about it.

Фото профиля adam c
adam c18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 I listened to this. Tom ran rings around you

Фото профиля Niall Murray
Niall Murray18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Nothing to see here - it’s ok for us to buy democracy tho boys

Фото профиля Julian
Julian18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Moron. Now you have your big contracts you are ok. Absolute Hypocrite.

Фото профиля Dan Wickes
Dan Wickes18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 👀

Фото профиля The Prince 👑👑
The Prince 👑👑18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Close the funding gap No problem with Reform then

Фото профиля Duck
Duck18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Does your company benefit from ROC’s? Whilst that’s not a direct subsidy it is a benefit afforded to ‘green energy’ companies levied on the consumer. TS’ phrasing is certainly imprecise but the optics of making a large donation and then benefiting from gvt backed schemes are bad.

Фото профиля Jimmy Mann
Jimmy Mann18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Look who’s talking

Фото профиля Devonviews ❤🚜🙏
Devonviews ❤🚜🙏18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Do as I say, not as I do; bloody hypocrite 🧐🫵

Фото профиля Jason
Jason18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Ban political parties and let local people stand

Фото профиля pcn
pcn18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 U r happy to donate how much to the Leibour party? And you’ve done very well out of your donations

Фото профиля Steven Galvin
Steven Galvin18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 How do lesser parties get an equal share of this pot, is it just the main two that are entitled to this Can the monster raving looney party / independents get an equal share

Фото профиля Jason
Jason18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 £100 million contracts

Фото профиля Face in the Sand
Face in the Sand18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 What a totalitarian power control freak🫣

Фото профиля R
R18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 dale you have clearly no idea how people feel, it’s trust me not about a packet of crisps

Фото профиля Leopardman 🐆 🇬🇧 ✝️✡️
Leopardman 🐆 🇬🇧 ✝️✡️18 дней назад

@GaryMcleft @TomSwarbrick1 You hypocrites.

Фото профиля Mike Doorly
Mike Doorly18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 And? Your answer was?

Фото профиля Football, Investing & Travel
Football, Investing & Travel17 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Pulling up the drawbridge after you've influenced

Фото профиля GO
GO18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Interesting that someone who has actively participated , received benefits in return now wants to play the policeman 🤔

Фото профиля 2_Tier_Kier
2_Tier_Kier18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 You are so arrogant you can't see your own failures.

Фото профиля R
R18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 so dale you now offer excuses for what you did “ it was how it was” last thing as a tax payer i want to do is give my money for parities to spend on elections, i don’t support them all. and how do we choose who gets what?

Фото профиля Pepe Le Moko
Pepe Le Moko18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 I agree with you but I'm sure, "I'm not a Tory boy" Tom pretended to sit on the fence. I can't abide listening to him but did he ever say "Devils Advocate"?

Фото профиля #RJ#
#RJ#18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 You got plenty of £££££ out of your donation though didn’t you? Why don’t you talk about that?

Фото профиля steve
steve17 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Well.... You have to say that now, don't you Dale.

Фото профиля The Old Baker
The Old Baker18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Do all your staff get the same wage ?

Фото профиля .
.18 дней назад

@TomSwarbrick1 Pay your subsidies back

Похожие видео

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

575,206 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A few days ago, at the meeting of the Senate Committee on Local Content, I had cause to recuse myself when I got to know that it was an investigative hearing summoned to investigate allegations of diversion of $14.8m against the former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Chief Timipre Sylva. As I explained, I attended believing it was an interactive forum with the Executive Secretary and his team. When I discovered that the hearing was specifically summoned for that purpose, I raised objections—firstly, on the ground that there should be no selective inquiry; that the entirety of the management of the fund, perhaps from inception, should be investigated, if at all, and not just one transaction. While the committee has the powers to decide what to investigate, I feel that this approach is too selective, especially bearing in mind that it is public knowledge that the EFCC has already taken steps — meaning they have investigated and reached a certain level. I thought the Committee need not investigate that particular transaction, even though it has the powers to do so. I recused myself because the person affected is a former governor of my state — my predecessor in office, and I have a policy of not joining to fight or pull down anyone. I am not like other politicians from my area or the typical politicians in Nigeria who celebrate the downfall of opponents and people they disagree with. The person concerned and I have been on different ends, leading different tendencies in various political battles in my state since 2011 till date. While we do not meet or speak or pursue any common political agenda, and we have not been in the same party since 2011, I do not practise politics that involves pulling people down or contributing to their problems. I have always limited political contest to campaigns during elections, where I outplan, out-campaign, strategize, and defeat them on the ground and through legal processes, but never by trying to bring anyone down after elections. As part of this policy I have extended support and encouragement to all who operate at the federal level in spite of political or partisan differences, knowing that if political interests do not align until elections, we will then resolve such differences at the polls. As I have always told our people, “we are few”; everyone is important. If you cannot help someone, leave the person alone, and don't destroy them. That has been my policy, which I have practised and taught for several years. As I have always maintained, I am in politics for service to God and man — I build, I raise, I develop, I defend; I don't destroy or pull down. I know that they don’t treat me the same way. When they are in a position to bring me down, they don't spare anything to achieve that goal, but to the glory of God, they have not succeeded so far, and God is still on His throne. I know these are very trying times, particularly for the people affected, and I do not intend to add to anyone’s problems. It is God who has always fought my battles and has ensured that my opponents, despite all they do using federal power or federal might, blackmail or propaganda, incitements, in spite of all these, they have not defeated my tendency till date. Even when all the major political figures unite against me, backed by federal might and greater resources, they still lose, as my politics is achored on God and the support and prayers of men — not on violence, destruction and pulling people down or celebrating their misfortune and downfall. It is on account of this that I explained my position to my colleagues in the committee, who saw reason with me, and I left. As a former governor, I feel I have a lifelong responsibility of support and fairness to all Bayelsans; which is why I have protected, supported, and encouraged all persons from my state, from the Niger Delta region, and all Nigerians, irrespective of party, till date on all issues that have been brought before me.

Henry Seriake Dickson

28,972 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: ABC just tried to grill Marco Rubio for the US giving Putin the "red carpet" and President Trump having a "warm handshake" - and Rubio was having NONE of it. "When I hear people say that, 'oh, it elevates him.' Well, all we do is talk about Putin all the time! All the media's done is talk about Putin all the time for last four, five years. That doesn't mean he's right about the war. That doesn't mean he's justified about the war. Put all that aside. It means you're not going to have a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. You're not going to end a war between Russia and Ukraine without dealing with Putin!" "That's that's just common sense. I shouldn't even have to say it! So people can say whatever they want. Ultimately, at the end of the day, we have to get the Russian side to agree to things that they don't want to agree to if we're going to have peace. If not, there'll just be a war." "They'll keep k*lling each other and life will go on in America and in the rest of the world, but not for Ukraine. So the president has invested a lot of time in trying to bring an end to this war. He deserves credit for doing that. He gets criticism for doing that. He could have just let this war go on. The president could have just said, 'this is Biden's war, it started under him, we'll do what we can for Ukraine, but we're going to focus on other things.' He could have easily said that. But he's the only leader in the world that got Putin to a meeting to talk about serious things."

Eric Daugherty

1,058,958 просмотров • 1 год назад

I keep reading nasty takes on the donations during Ilia's streams and his reactions about them, and, as you can expect, I wanted to comment on that. 😜 Of course, the amount of these donations is not insignificant and, considering the niche sport figure skating is, the money do actually help Ilia. It does not matter whether he would invest those in any skating gear or in his student life or in his home furniture or streamer equipment - as long as he is happy with the investment, it is all good. But his sweet happy reactions are not because of the donations per se. One can clearly hear how his voice overwhelmingly breaks down and his eyes start blickering with emotions. And this right here is not related to money, it's all about a realization Ilia is slowly coming to - that people genuinely love HIM. Not just the skater Ilia Malinin but the sweet 21-year-old Virginia boy, beyond the medals and off rink. And that he has given people so many happy moments that they would like to give him something back. Every single donation - be it $1 or $500 - is mentioned by Ilia and he keeps thanking his fans, always claiming how "blessed" he is. He often says no one needs to donate - just being on the stream is enough, wishes good night to people leaving late at night or happy birthdays, answers questions, interacts as much as possible while enjoying his game. The streams slowly transformed from "Ilia playing video games" to "Ilia sharing his free time with fans while playing video games" - and it's a beautiful interaction which will only grow stronger, I believe. And will give Ilia the confidence that people do love and support him, and will continue doing so. We are the blessed ones, my boy. Thank you for everything! 🤍

*девочка с юга*

13,426 просмотров • 26 дней назад

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.”

The All-In Podcast

152,671 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Scott Jennings just blew up the Democrats’ favorite excuse. They’re now claiming Graham Platner wasn’t properly vetted, but Jennings wasn’t buying it for a second. He reminded the CNN panel that prominent Democrats like Ro Khanna, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Tim Walz all knew about Platner’s past — and backed him anyway. JENNINGS: “The only thing I disagree with is when she said that he hadn’t been vetted.” “No, he had been vetted!” “All of the things that have been stated, it was all out in the public and people like Ro Khanna, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Tim Walz, the Bulwark, Pod Save America, all these people came together to overlook it all, to explain it all, to rationalize it all.” “He was vetted. People knew all these things and a whole bunch of Democrats in Maine showed up and voted for him anyway. And a bunch of donors from around the country sent him money anyway.” “I agree with Alyssa’s question. What changed? Why are you bailing on Graham Platner now?!” “You already signed off on Nazi tattoo, a self-described communist, somebody who’s had rape fantasies, somebody who has been on a social media platform known as a playground for predators.” “And on and on and on and on and on.” “And the difference between this accuser and the previous one is simply this, she’s a liberal. It’s okay, I guess, for Democrats that their candidate’s assault conservatives.” “But he broke into someone’s house. And apparently, according to her, raped her. And because her politics are correct, they can now believe it.” “All of this whole thing is disgusting. But to say that they hadn’t vetted him, or that they didn’t know about all this is totally false.” “They knew it and they signed up for it, and I don’t know why they’re backing away from this scumbag today when they had already signed off on all that other crazy behavior.” Scott Jennings

Overton

475,462 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад