Just Robert Jenrick here explaining how two crypto billionaires living abroad in order to pay less tax rather than their fair share to actually er - help the poor -are somehow "patriotic". This from the man that said the walking stick thugs ought to be given medals for brutally... assaulting two women at his party conference last week and BOO HOO to the injures she suffered. Jenrick supports violence against women.show more

Who'd have thunk we'd see BBC platforming Reform again, their propaganda channel GBNews will have nobody to platform at this rate.

I know .well £72m gets them a seat at the the table now Well..it always did

I remember when Jenrick was such a wet that he had a nickname of Robert Generic, he was a Tory soft who supported staying in the EU, like Truss, he has continued to move further and further right, why ? Just follow the money that comes from shouting about immigration and hate.

But your ok with Labour donors paying Labour over £128M during the current parliament? Seems like it’s a case of donations are ok but only if it’s a party you support….. typical messed up lefty

Those walking stick thugs are pensioners that are seeing their country get worse every week due to the current mess that we are in.Pensioners with walking sticks or illegals with zombie knifes and machetes ??Lets address the real elephant in the room

Narinder KKKaur still fighting tooth and nail not to have to go home to India

She was a paid instigator she got her arse handed to her for putting herself on that position! We know people like you will play on that 1 fucking female whilst 1000's of others are gang raped and ignored! Bit but she's a lefty! Right??

Wah wah wah. Poor gobshite still having your Refoem tantrum. You may as well be in the same sandpit as your pathetic side kick @donmcgowan Cry more hypocrites.

JenPrick has never anything sensible to say!!

How has he not resigned for what he said??

Our politics has sank so low(e) that they can do and say, as they like. There is no challenge anymore 🤷‍♂️ and it is all being normalised.

One of them lives here is from Sheffield check your facts before posting falsehoods

Boo Hoo

There are very few politicians I dislike more than Jenrick, the biggest traitor in British politics for a very long time.

It’s coming get your flight booked

Maybe they would rather see their money going to patriots instead of foreigners and illegal immigrants.

Stop Bull crappin you vile thing. If any of those dopey cows had sustained any injuries, the lefty lunatic pieces of 💩 like you would have been all over it like a rash. There haven’t even been any charges so let it go Desperado Meltdown old Minger!

You sad bitch. Fuck off to the shit hole you came from

They aren’t patriots just like he and the rest of Reform aren’t patriots. The establishment party that is Reform want to ruin this country and make it’s working people poorerwhile lining theirs and their billionaire mates pockets.

Thugs in suits lead #Reform

they do more good for others than you ever could thats for sure.

Don’t remember your outrage with a Labour donations? Dale Vince, Lord Sainsbury, Cayman Islands…..

You racist twat

Lord Sainsbury?! Lord Ali ?! The list goes on and on . . . Care to comment?

At no point did she need medical attention you stupid racist COW!!😡😡😡🙄🙄🤷‍♂️

Is the low iq woman still crying about a party who has got let money than the usual two parties of the the last 5 years. Ffs woman, you need to either fuck off or wake up and get yourself an education.

Stones and glass houses comes to mind....

So patriotic neither has paid uk tax for years

Replace private donations with formula-based public funding: 1. It would sharply reduce the risk that a small number of very rich individuals or organisation, companies can buy disproportionate access or influence. Large gifts would no longer be the main way parties raise money. 2. It would create a more level playing field. Parties that currently struggle to attract mega-donors would no longer be at a structural disadvantage compared with those that can. 3. Parties would become more accountable to voters than to donors, because their income would depend on votes, seats or membership rather than on cultivating a few wealthy backers. 4. It treats parties as necessary public institutions (like courts or the civil service) rather than private organisations whose funding is nobody else’s business. Democracy, the argument goes, cannot function without organised parties, so the state has a legitimate interest in keeping them solvent and relatively independent of private money. 5. Transparency would improve because the source of almost all party income would be a single, published government grant instead of a mix of private gifts that can be hard to trace. These points are usually paired with a formula (most commonly a combination of votes received and seats won) so that funding still tracks public support rather than being handed out equally to every registered party.

Getting scared are we are? Don't get too comfortable.

I'm going for a couple of drinks to celebrate Lefty Meltdown Sunday

Bollox he doesn’t you are good at twisting things 🤣🤣

These people must be voted out… they aren’t fit for purpose….

Just bitter jealousy