Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Just sat down with Yev Marusenko, Yev Marusenko, from Sizzle AI—an edtech app with millions of users that’s rethinking how our kids (and we) learn in the AI era. 📱 Sizzle isn’t just “ChatGPT for homework.” It builds entire courses from your prompts—bite-sized, mobile, interactive. 💡 Why it matters:...

Scobleizer's profile picture

Robert Scoble

591,160 subscribers

25,612 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Yev Marusenko, Ph.D.
Yev Marusenko, Ph.D.vor 1 Jahr

My pleasure! Thank you Robert. Great questions and your insights made me think! Lots of room for AI to continue disrupting education.

Profilbild von Robert Scoble
Robert Scoblevor 1 Jahr

Love! I learned a lot too!

Profilbild von Places Visited & Pictures Taken
Places Visited & Pictures Takenvor 2 Jahren

How do you choose the best picture in less time?

Profilbild von SizzleAI
SizzleAIvor 1 Jahr

@DoctorYev Less gamification dopamine, more brain growth. 💯🎯🧠

Profilbild von Cheesecake Classics
Cheesecake Classicsvor 1 Jahr

@DoctorYev Terrific idea. Kudos 🍸

Profilbild von Avi ⚜️
Avi ⚜️vor 1 Jahr

@DoctorYev @Infinilearn_ is doing a similar thing. Education is going to transform with AI.

Profilbild von Hanrii 🍌🍕
Hanrii 🍌🍕vor 1 Jahr

@DoctorYev 👀

Profilbild von Mike Boysen (JTBD/acc)
Mike Boysen (JTBD/acc)vor 1 Jahr

@DoctorYev What will annexpensive piece of paper actually be worth next year once these approaches get normalized? Not much

Profilbild von Robert Scoble
Robert Scoblevor 1 Jahr

@DoctorYev What matters is your brain.

Profilbild von Mohan Narendran
Mohan Narendranvor 1 Jahr

@DoctorYev Thanks very much @Scobleizer

Ähnliche Videos

Episode 5 of How I AI with some practical AI hacks for managers from hilary gridley, Head of Core Product at WHOOP. This one is all about feedback: how to scale it, how to make it specific, how to give it to AI tools. You’ll learn how to: - build rubrics for what “good” looks like - create GPTs to “think like you” and use them to scale quality feedback to your team - use prompting techniques to improve the insights you get from AI - improve your quality of writing and strategic thinking by bringing it all together Plus we gab about getting more women in AI, girly use cases for chatGPT, and whether or not getting invited to meetings is a good thing. Check it out in the links below 👇🔗 As always, a big thanks to our sponsors: 🔀 Orkes enterprise platform for genetic workflows ☑️ Vanta automate compliance and simplify security
0:41

Episode 5 of How I AI with some practical AI hacks for managers from hilary gridley, Head of Core Product at WHOOP. This one is all about feedback: how to scale it, how to make it specific, how to give it to AI tools. You’ll learn how to: - build rubrics for what “good” looks like - create GPTs to “think like you” and use them to scale quality feedback to your team - use prompting techniques to improve the insights you get from AI - improve your quality of writing and strategic thinking by bringing it all together Plus we gab about getting more women in AI, girly use cases for chatGPT, and whether or not getting invited to meetings is a good thing. Check it out in the links below 👇🔗 As always, a big thanks to our sponsors: 🔀 Orkes enterprise platform for genetic workflows ☑️ Vanta automate compliance and simplify security

claire vo 🖤

18,933 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Most AI tools today are just command-takers. You type, it responds. You click, it executes. There's truly no learning, no memory, no adaptation. You're still doing most of the work. Which is why Miles by Avo on Solana would make so much sense if built well. From what I understand so far, miles learns about you over time, adapts to how you operate, and figures out the tools you struggle to navigate on your own. Less clicking, more conversation, the more you use it, the better it gets at working with you, not just for you. That shift from command-follower to learning companion is bigger than it sounds. It's the difference between a tool and an agent that actually knows you. The second one is Agent Grid and this one is for builders and power users. But as I mentioned in this video, I'm still studying the Agent Grid. I'd come talk about it once I learn properly about it. Souren just keeps shipping!
1:28

Most AI tools today are just command-takers. You type, it responds. You click, it executes. There's truly no learning, no memory, no adaptation. You're still doing most of the work. Which is why Miles by Avo on Solana would make so much sense if built well. From what I understand so far, miles learns about you over time, adapts to how you operate, and figures out the tools you struggle to navigate on your own. Less clicking, more conversation, the more you use it, the better it gets at working with you, not just for you. That shift from command-follower to learning companion is bigger than it sounds. It's the difference between a tool and an agent that actually knows you. The second one is Agent Grid and this one is for builders and power users. But as I mentioned in this video, I'm still studying the Agent Grid. I'd come talk about it once I learn properly about it. Souren just keeps shipping!

Sir Khaycee

20,419 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk: At this point, education is mostly a social experience. You don’t actually need school to learn anymore. With AI, you can learn just as much—or more—on your phone at home. School is becoming less about knowledge and more about being around people your own age. People should go to school today mainly for the social side of it. The learning itself? AI can already do that better. Conventional schooling could be vastly improved, and individualized AI teachers will outperform the one-size-fits-all classroom. Education doesn’t need to happen in a building anymore. You could learn everything at home on your phone. Kids go to school to hang out, build social skills, and experience a coming-of-age—not because it’s the most effective way to learn. School today functions as a social filter, not a learning engine. AI handles the learning better. Humans still go to school for friendships, relationships, leadership, confidence, and real-world social development.
1:29

Elon Musk: At this point, education is mostly a social experience. You don’t actually need school to learn anymore. With AI, you can learn just as much—or more—on your phone at home. School is becoming less about knowledge and more about being around people your own age. People should go to school today mainly for the social side of it. The learning itself? AI can already do that better. Conventional schooling could be vastly improved, and individualized AI teachers will outperform the one-size-fits-all classroom. Education doesn’t need to happen in a building anymore. You could learn everything at home on your phone. Kids go to school to hang out, build social skills, and experience a coming-of-age—not because it’s the most effective way to learn. School today functions as a social filter, not a learning engine. AI handles the learning better. Humans still go to school for friendships, relationships, leadership, confidence, and real-world social development.

Ian Miles Cheong

293,395 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Most people think AI means we don’t need to learn anymore. But that idea crumbled last month when I sat across from Stanford Graduate School of Education Dean, Dan Schwartz. Dan read this to the audience: “The procedure is actually quite simple. First you arrange things into different groups. Of course, one pile may be sufficient depending on how much there is. If you have to go somewhere else due to lack of facilities that is the next step; otherwise you are pretty well set. It is important not to overdo things. That is, it is better to do too few things at once than too many…” No one really understood it. Then he gave them one line of context: “This is about doing laundry.” And suddenly it all made sense. Same paragraph. Same words. But once you *knew* what it was about, your brain could organize the information. Dan looked at the audience and said, “If you don’t know enough, the AI’s output is just words and sentences. You might *think* you understand it, but you don’t.” And he’s right. AI doesn’t eliminate the need to learn—it makes real knowledge more important than ever. This is a conversation we’re constantly having at Alpha. Because when a kid asks ChatGPT a question, how do they know if the answer’s even good? How do they know when to push back or ask more? It all comes back to this: you need knowledge to interpret the output. That’s why we still teach writing. That’s why we teach proportionality. That’s why we want kids to understand germ theory, gravity, and the Bill of Rights. Not because they’ll regurgitate it on a test, but because they’ll need that knowledge to make sense of the world (and the tools) around them. AI will make learning faster, more playful, and more personalized. But it won’t replace the need to learn. It’ll just expose when we haven’t. And as Dan reminded us on stage, the real purpose of education isn’t just facts or grades. It’s helping kids build meaning, curiosity, and the wisdom to use their tools well. Deep thanks to Dean Dan Schwartz for sharing his time and expertise with Alpha and our community.
1:18

Most people think AI means we don’t need to learn anymore. But that idea crumbled last month when I sat across from Stanford Graduate School of Education Dean, Dan Schwartz. Dan read this to the audience: “The procedure is actually quite simple. First you arrange things into different groups. Of course, one pile may be sufficient depending on how much there is. If you have to go somewhere else due to lack of facilities that is the next step; otherwise you are pretty well set. It is important not to overdo things. That is, it is better to do too few things at once than too many…” No one really understood it. Then he gave them one line of context: “This is about doing laundry.” And suddenly it all made sense. Same paragraph. Same words. But once you *knew* what it was about, your brain could organize the information. Dan looked at the audience and said, “If you don’t know enough, the AI’s output is just words and sentences. You might *think* you understand it, but you don’t.” And he’s right. AI doesn’t eliminate the need to learn—it makes real knowledge more important than ever. This is a conversation we’re constantly having at Alpha. Because when a kid asks ChatGPT a question, how do they know if the answer’s even good? How do they know when to push back or ask more? It all comes back to this: you need knowledge to interpret the output. That’s why we still teach writing. That’s why we teach proportionality. That’s why we want kids to understand germ theory, gravity, and the Bill of Rights. Not because they’ll regurgitate it on a test, but because they’ll need that knowledge to make sense of the world (and the tools) around them. AI will make learning faster, more playful, and more personalized. But it won’t replace the need to learn. It’ll just expose when we haven’t. And as Dan reminded us on stage, the real purpose of education isn’t just facts or grades. It’s helping kids build meaning, curiosity, and the wisdom to use their tools well. Deep thanks to Dean Dan Schwartz for sharing his time and expertise with Alpha and our community.

MacKenzie Price

14,491 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What do you do for a living today? AI and intelligent robots will increasingly take over many tasks from humans. And they will do it better, faster and cheaper. Yes, yours too. Many people will work much less or not at all in normal jobs. And earn less or even nothing. What will you live on then? And how will our companies survive when their customers don't have the money to buy their products and services? This is the key question for your financial future! We will take a look at three scenarios for the future of our life and the economy. If AI and robots work for us on a large scale, our future could be great. However, it could also turn out quite differently. We could also wake up in a horror scenario. Because we have a huge and catastrophic flaw in our economic system that could lead to disaster in a world of AI and robotics. Correcting this mistake is the biggest challenge. What the flaw is and how we can fix it, you'll learn in this video.
25:39

What do you do for a living today? AI and intelligent robots will increasingly take over many tasks from humans. And they will do it better, faster and cheaper. Yes, yours too. Many people will work much less or not at all in normal jobs. And earn less or even nothing. What will you live on then? And how will our companies survive when their customers don't have the money to buy their products and services? This is the key question for your financial future! We will take a look at three scenarios for the future of our life and the economy. If AI and robots work for us on a large scale, our future could be great. However, it could also turn out quite differently. We could also wake up in a horror scenario. Because we have a huge and catastrophic flaw in our economic system that could lead to disaster in a world of AI and robotics. Correcting this mistake is the biggest challenge. What the flaw is and how we can fix it, you'll learn in this video.

Dr Pero Micic

12,010,133 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

If you listen to folks in the AI labs right now, they’re all quietly terrified by the speed of AI development. Anthropic just published a letter openly asking for the option to pause or slow R&D because of how fast recursive self-improvement is coming but noting that they can’t do that without being able to verify that their competitors were doing the same. That’s why it’s critically important that we build the tech needed to verify AI agreements. On this week’s episode of Your Undivided Attention, I sat down with two experts on AI governance, Tim Fist and Janet Egan, to talk about the kinds of verification technology we need for AI, the challenges of building it, and the world it could unlock if we did. Given how critical verification technology is, you would assume there are thousands of people working in it. In reality, there’s only around fifty. We urgently need to put our attention, time, and energy into this critical area. Check out our full conversation:
1:00

If you listen to folks in the AI labs right now, they’re all quietly terrified by the speed of AI development. Anthropic just published a letter openly asking for the option to pause or slow R&D because of how fast recursive self-improvement is coming but noting that they can’t do that without being able to verify that their competitors were doing the same. That’s why it’s critically important that we build the tech needed to verify AI agreements. On this week’s episode of Your Undivided Attention, I sat down with two experts on AI governance, Tim Fist and Janet Egan, to talk about the kinds of verification technology we need for AI, the challenges of building it, and the world it could unlock if we did. Given how critical verification technology is, you would assume there are thousands of people working in it. In reality, there’s only around fifty. We urgently need to put our attention, time, and energy into this critical area. Check out our full conversation:

Tristan Harris

45,728 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

🧵24/34 Inner Misalignment --- Consider this simplified experiment: We want this AI to find the exit of the maze. So we feed it millions of maze variations and reward it when it finds the exit. Please notice that in the worlds of the training data the apples are red and the exit is green. After enough training, our observation is that it has become extremely capable at solving mazes and finding the exit, we feel very confident it is aligned, so then we deploy it to the real world. The real world will be different though, it might have green apples and a red door. The AI geeks call this distributional shift. We expected that the AI will generalise and find the exit again, but in fact we now realise that the AI learned something completely different from what we thought. All the while we thought it learned how to find the exit, it had learned how to go after the green thing. Its behaviour was perfect in training. And most importantly, this AI is not stupid, it is an extremely capable AI that can solve extremely complex mazes. It’s just mis-aligned on the inside. Fishing for Failure modes --- The way to handle the shift between the training and deployment distributions is with methods like adversarial training: feeding it with a lot of generated variations and trying to make it fail so the weakness can be fixed. In this case, we generate an insane amount of maze variations, we discover those for which it fails to find the exit (like the ones with the green apples or the green walls or something), we generate many more similar to that and train it with reinforcement learning until it performs well at those as well. The hope is that we will cover everything it might encounter later when we deploy it in real life. There exist at least 2 basic ways this approach falls apart: First, there will never be any guarantee that we’ll have covered every possible random thing it might encounter later when we deploy it in real life. It’s very likely it will have to deal with stuff outside its training set which it will not know how to handle and will throw it out of balance and break it away from its expected behavioural patterns. The cascade effect of such a broken mind operating in the open world can be immense, and with super-capable runaway rogue agents, self-replicating and recursively self-improving, the phenomenon could grow and spread to an extinction-level event. ...
3:19

🧵24/34 Inner Misalignment --- Consider this simplified experiment: We want this AI to find the exit of the maze. So we feed it millions of maze variations and reward it when it finds the exit. Please notice that in the worlds of the training data the apples are red and the exit is green. After enough training, our observation is that it has become extremely capable at solving mazes and finding the exit, we feel very confident it is aligned, so then we deploy it to the real world. The real world will be different though, it might have green apples and a red door. The AI geeks call this distributional shift. We expected that the AI will generalise and find the exit again, but in fact we now realise that the AI learned something completely different from what we thought. All the while we thought it learned how to find the exit, it had learned how to go after the green thing. Its behaviour was perfect in training. And most importantly, this AI is not stupid, it is an extremely capable AI that can solve extremely complex mazes. It’s just mis-aligned on the inside. Fishing for Failure modes --- The way to handle the shift between the training and deployment distributions is with methods like adversarial training: feeding it with a lot of generated variations and trying to make it fail so the weakness can be fixed. In this case, we generate an insane amount of maze variations, we discover those for which it fails to find the exit (like the ones with the green apples or the green walls or something), we generate many more similar to that and train it with reinforcement learning until it performs well at those as well. The hope is that we will cover everything it might encounter later when we deploy it in real life. There exist at least 2 basic ways this approach falls apart: First, there will never be any guarantee that we’ll have covered every possible random thing it might encounter later when we deploy it in real life. It’s very likely it will have to deal with stuff outside its training set which it will not know how to handle and will throw it out of balance and break it away from its expected behavioural patterns. The cascade effect of such a broken mind operating in the open world can be immense, and with super-capable runaway rogue agents, self-replicating and recursively self-improving, the phenomenon could grow and spread to an extinction-level event. ...

Lethal Intelligence

535,291 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

AI is changing everything about business. In my latest interview, I sat down with AJ Orbach 🐳 AJ Orbach, co-founder of Triple Whale, who’s building what might be the most advanced AI business agent on the planet. We talked: 1. How AI agents are replacing dashboards 2. Why most businesses are sitting on goldmines of data they’re not using 3. The rise of autonomous companies (yes, for real) 4. Why tomorrow’s CEO will be more like a chief QA officer for AI 5. And how one couple scaled a business from $400K to $4M without hiring anyone If you want a glimpse into the real future of work — this is it. 🎧 Watch or listen here:
57:29

AI is changing everything about business. In my latest interview, I sat down with AJ Orbach 🐳 AJ Orbach, co-founder of Triple Whale, who’s building what might be the most advanced AI business agent on the planet. We talked: 1. How AI agents are replacing dashboards 2. Why most businesses are sitting on goldmines of data they’re not using 3. The rise of autonomous companies (yes, for real) 4. Why tomorrow’s CEO will be more like a chief QA officer for AI 5. And how one couple scaled a business from $400K to $4M without hiring anyone If you want a glimpse into the real future of work — this is it. 🎧 Watch or listen here:

Robert Scoble

17,304 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This should be illegal The Beauty Authority is advertising real procedures and showing off real results for procedures in their magazine Only one problem, it’s all fake. Every image credit is an AI prompt they typed and to generate the image “Photo credit is an AI prompt — article is about beauty procedures. So why are we using fake women to talk about real women's bodies?” Believe it or not, this is legal There is no federal law prohibiting the use of AI-generated images in advertising or editorial content, as long as the overall ad isn’t materially deceptive But to me this is deceptive, the entire woman they’re advertising the procedure for is fake, it’s artificial intelligence generated. So how can you show real results if they’re generated down a prompt… This needs regulation
3:37

This should be illegal The Beauty Authority is advertising real procedures and showing off real results for procedures in their magazine Only one problem, it’s all fake. Every image credit is an AI prompt they typed and to generate the image “Photo credit is an AI prompt — article is about beauty procedures. So why are we using fake women to talk about real women's bodies?” Believe it or not, this is legal There is no federal law prohibiting the use of AI-generated images in advertising or editorial content, as long as the overall ad isn’t materially deceptive But to me this is deceptive, the entire woman they’re advertising the procedure for is fake, it’s artificial intelligence generated. So how can you show real results if they’re generated down a prompt… This needs regulation

Wall Street Apes

20,978 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

One of the biggest things Tesla FSD has changed for my family is how we use road trip time. A lot of parents ask me how my kids spend so much time learning, reading, and asking questions, and why we don’t load up our summers with endless camps. The truth is, some of our best learnings happen right in my Tesla. While Tesla FSD handles 100% of the driving, our road trips become productive family time. We bring books, laptops, and our curiosity on our rides. My kids read, learn new things with Grok, research topics they’re interested in, play educational games, and ask questions about the world around them. With Starlink keeping us connected anywhere, the car becomes literally a mobile classroom. What’s funny is that my kids are growing up thinking this is normal. To them, learning with Daddy while traveling down the highway feels completely natural. Years ago, road trips were mostly about getting from Point A to Point B. Today, they’re an opportunity for our family to learn, create, explore ideas, and spend quality time together. The combination of Tesla FSD, Starlink, computers, books, and AI has completely changed how our family travels.
1:40

One of the biggest things Tesla FSD has changed for my family is how we use road trip time. A lot of parents ask me how my kids spend so much time learning, reading, and asking questions, and why we don’t load up our summers with endless camps. The truth is, some of our best learnings happen right in my Tesla. While Tesla FSD handles 100% of the driving, our road trips become productive family time. We bring books, laptops, and our curiosity on our rides. My kids read, learn new things with Grok, research topics they’re interested in, play educational games, and ask questions about the world around them. With Starlink keeping us connected anywhere, the car becomes literally a mobile classroom. What’s funny is that my kids are growing up thinking this is normal. To them, learning with Daddy while traveling down the highway feels completely natural. Years ago, road trips were mostly about getting from Point A to Point B. Today, they’re an opportunity for our family to learn, create, explore ideas, and spend quality time together. The combination of Tesla FSD, Starlink, computers, books, and AI has completely changed how our family travels.

Teslaconomics

38,070 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Jensen Huang said if he were a student today, he wouldn’t prioritize coding. He’d prioritize learning how to talk to AI. Most people treat AI like Google. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Huang sees it differently. He calls it “expertise in artistry,” which sounds dramatic but makes sense when you think about it. The real skill isn’t using AI. It’s knowing what to ask for and how to refine it. “Learning to interact with AI is not unlike being really good at asking questions.” If you’re a doctor, can you use AI to catch diagnoses you’d miss? If you’re a lawyer, can you sharpen arguments faster than your competition? The leverage comes from pairing what you know with how well you can direct the tool. Domain expertise multiplied by AI fluency equals amplification. Without the expertise, the AI is just noise. Without fluency, you’re leaving most of the capability on the table. The question isn’t whether AI will replace you. It’s whether someone who knows how to use it better will.
1:18

Jensen Huang said if he were a student today, he wouldn’t prioritize coding. He’d prioritize learning how to talk to AI. Most people treat AI like Google. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Huang sees it differently. He calls it “expertise in artistry,” which sounds dramatic but makes sense when you think about it. The real skill isn’t using AI. It’s knowing what to ask for and how to refine it. “Learning to interact with AI is not unlike being really good at asking questions.” If you’re a doctor, can you use AI to catch diagnoses you’d miss? If you’re a lawyer, can you sharpen arguments faster than your competition? The leverage comes from pairing what you know with how well you can direct the tool. Domain expertise multiplied by AI fluency equals amplification. Without the expertise, the AI is just noise. Without fluency, you’re leaving most of the capability on the table. The question isn’t whether AI will replace you. It’s whether someone who knows how to use it better will.

Dustin

786,400 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

It’s going to be a complex and unpredictable and unprecedented era ahead for all of us business people and marketers - the ai 🤖 era is here and there will be many changes but what’s clear at least in the short term ..is that the most creative and most strategic will gain “market share” over time ai will eat up a lot of tasks and process we have valued, we will all have to adjust, we can’t fear it or try to justify why it “isn’t” we must get into our creative and strategic “bags” and learn how to use these tools to excelerate our seeds of “ideas” or “observations” there will also be so much opportunity in the counter to all this technology .. real life events, experiences will continue to explode in value and opportunity… who’s ready ?
0:44

It’s going to be a complex and unpredictable and unprecedented era ahead for all of us business people and marketers - the ai 🤖 era is here and there will be many changes but what’s clear at least in the short term ..is that the most creative and most strategic will gain “market share” over time ai will eat up a lot of tasks and process we have valued, we will all have to adjust, we can’t fear it or try to justify why it “isn’t” we must get into our creative and strategic “bags” and learn how to use these tools to excelerate our seeds of “ideas” or “observations” there will also be so much opportunity in the counter to all this technology .. real life events, experiences will continue to explode in value and opportunity… who’s ready ?

Gary Vaynerchuk

22,888 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In the AI era, the traditional biopharma industry is the underdog. Big tech and AI labs are building wet labs. China has overtaken Europe in molecules produced. But the tools available to the industry discuss science, not do it. The hard problem in AI for science is at the interface between the physical and digital worlds. We built an AI Scientist at that seam. It wires together the digital and physical worlds of R&D. Predictive models, data infrastructure, wet lab execution feed into a single loop that reasons, acts, and improves with every experiment. Our ambition: get molecules to the clinic twice as fast. Last fall I wrote about why biotech needs to be rebuilt for the AI era. Today I'm sharing the next chapter: what the AI Scientist is, a blueprint for how it works, and why even Richard Feynman couldn't hack it in a wet lab.
1:44

In the AI era, the traditional biopharma industry is the underdog. Big tech and AI labs are building wet labs. China has overtaken Europe in molecules produced. But the tools available to the industry discuss science, not do it. The hard problem in AI for science is at the interface between the physical and digital worlds. We built an AI Scientist at that seam. It wires together the digital and physical worlds of R&D. Predictive models, data infrastructure, wet lab execution feed into a single loop that reasons, acts, and improves with every experiment. Our ambition: get molecules to the clinic twice as fast. Last fall I wrote about why biotech needs to be rebuilt for the AI era. Today I'm sharing the next chapter: what the AI Scientist is, a blueprint for how it works, and why even Richard Feynman couldn't hack it in a wet lab.

Sajith Wickramasekara

30,566 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

“We now find ourselves in a world where we understand how almost everything works, but we know the meaning of nothing.” That's not a religious argument. That's a scientific one. And this isn’t coming from someone who abandoned logic to find faith… Today’s guest is John Lennox, a mathematician who has spent 70 years interrogating faith with logic, science, philosophy, and evidence and somehow came out the other side more convinced., I sat down with John as I wanted a conversation not only around religion, but how AI is making every one of us ask religious-sized questions. We discussed things like: - Why artificial intelligence is still artificial - The difference between simulating intelligence and possessing consciousness - Human dignity in the age of AI and why it matters more, not less - Loneliness and why it makes us vulnerable to fake connection - The peace that most of us are actually searching for I didn’t feel like I was being pushed towards an answer. Instead I was being invited to think more honestly about the questions. You do not have to share his faith to learn from the way he thinks. For anyone asking what makes us human in a world of machines, this is a conversation I would really recommend.
1:29

“We now find ourselves in a world where we understand how almost everything works, but we know the meaning of nothing.” That's not a religious argument. That's a scientific one. And this isn’t coming from someone who abandoned logic to find faith… Today’s guest is John Lennox, a mathematician who has spent 70 years interrogating faith with logic, science, philosophy, and evidence and somehow came out the other side more convinced., I sat down with John as I wanted a conversation not only around religion, but how AI is making every one of us ask religious-sized questions. We discussed things like: - Why artificial intelligence is still artificial - The difference between simulating intelligence and possessing consciousness - Human dignity in the age of AI and why it matters more, not less - Loneliness and why it makes us vulnerable to fake connection - The peace that most of us are actually searching for I didn’t feel like I was being pushed towards an answer. Instead I was being invited to think more honestly about the questions. You do not have to share his faith to learn from the way he thinks. For anyone asking what makes us human in a world of machines, this is a conversation I would really recommend.

Steven Bartlett

17,885 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

An AI-based social media app is coming. Kristen Garcia Dumont (ex-Machine Zone CEO) has founded a new social media app called BeFake, to redefine social media. The app lets users snap fantasy versions of themselves using AI-generated images. More details: -It allows users to express creativity beyond just selfies by submitting text prompts to generate visuals. -CEO Kristen Garcia Dumont sees it as more authentic self-expression versus the pressure of real pictures. -The most creative faux identities gain traction in the app's community, with users able to share images from prompts and react to their favorites. The founder of BeFake is no joke, with some of the top-grossing mobile games globally under her belt. I'll be watching this app closely as it might play a pivotal role in the widespread integration of AI into social media. What do you think?
0:50

An AI-based social media app is coming. Kristen Garcia Dumont (ex-Machine Zone CEO) has founded a new social media app called BeFake, to redefine social media. The app lets users snap fantasy versions of themselves using AI-generated images. More details: -It allows users to express creativity beyond just selfies by submitting text prompts to generate visuals. -CEO Kristen Garcia Dumont sees it as more authentic self-expression versus the pressure of real pictures. -The most creative faux identities gain traction in the app's community, with users able to share images from prompts and react to their favorites. The founder of BeFake is no joke, with some of the top-grossing mobile games globally under her belt. I'll be watching this app closely as it might play a pivotal role in the widespread integration of AI into social media. What do you think?

Rowan Cheung

349,660 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Do you understand what's happening? It's not just "AI can make iOS apps" anymore. AI is eating up the entire software industry. Even Dario Amodei (founder of Claude) said 90% of all code in the world would be written by AI. In 20 minutes, I built this Duolingo for AI upskilling app with Superapp. The idea was simple - almost everyone today knows AI is the future, but most of them are still feeling left out. Their current jobs don't leave them with enough time to actually learn and build stuff with AI. There's AI dev, video making, animations, testing, etc. But no time or clear direction. So I built an app to fix exactly this. With AgentIQ, you get new lessons every day. Every time you learn something, it gets added to your skillset and automatically refreshes your portfolio. You level up with every new chapter/pathway. It is self-paced but gamified enough (like Duolingo) that you never get out of touch. Without spending hours or tonnes of money, you build stuff with n8n, openclaw, etc. You ship AI videos to market your own AI apps. This could be a proper ed-tech company if someone wants to continue building on top. Happy to share the entire source code with you if you wanna pursue it. Like + comment "AGENT" and I'll send you the app link, a comprehensive guide to build production-ready apps, and the entire source code for this.
1:12

Do you understand what's happening? It's not just "AI can make iOS apps" anymore. AI is eating up the entire software industry. Even Dario Amodei (founder of Claude) said 90% of all code in the world would be written by AI. In 20 minutes, I built this Duolingo for AI upskilling app with Superapp. The idea was simple - almost everyone today knows AI is the future, but most of them are still feeling left out. Their current jobs don't leave them with enough time to actually learn and build stuff with AI. There's AI dev, video making, animations, testing, etc. But no time or clear direction. So I built an app to fix exactly this. With AgentIQ, you get new lessons every day. Every time you learn something, it gets added to your skillset and automatically refreshes your portfolio. You level up with every new chapter/pathway. It is self-paced but gamified enough (like Duolingo) that you never get out of touch. Without spending hours or tonnes of money, you build stuff with n8n, openclaw, etc. You ship AI videos to market your own AI apps. This could be a proper ed-tech company if someone wants to continue building on top. Happy to share the entire source code with you if you wanna pursue it. Like + comment "AGENT" and I'll send you the app link, a comprehensive guide to build production-ready apps, and the entire source code for this.

Kritarth Mittal | Soshals

25,363 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

What if the question isn’t whether to use AI, but how fast you can learn to work with it? In this special episode recorded live at Webex One, I talk with Jeetu Patel (Jeetu Patel), President and Chief Product Officer at Cisco, about the mindset shift every company, and every professional, must make to thrive in the AI era. From rethinking work culture to designing products for both humans and AI agents, Jeetu shares a thoughtful, optimistic vision for the future, one rooted in curiosity, responsibility, and human creativity. “AI won’t take your job. But someone who uses AI better than you might.” An honest, energizing look at how to lead and learn in an AI-first world. 1:08 Embracing AI In The Workforce 5:17 AI Is More Than A Productivity Tool 8:35 Generational Differences In AI Use 10:49 The Future of Integrating AI Agents 13:44 AI As A "Given" 17:08 Speed of Accumulating Knowledge 19:00 Ethical AI Use 21:16 What The Industry Gets Wrong About AI
23:48

What if the question isn’t whether to use AI, but how fast you can learn to work with it? In this special episode recorded live at Webex One, I talk with Jeetu Patel (Jeetu Patel), President and Chief Product Officer at Cisco, about the mindset shift every company, and every professional, must make to thrive in the AI era. From rethinking work culture to designing products for both humans and AI agents, Jeetu shares a thoughtful, optimistic vision for the future, one rooted in curiosity, responsibility, and human creativity. “AI won’t take your job. But someone who uses AI better than you might.” An honest, energizing look at how to lead and learn in an AI-first world. 1:08 Embracing AI In The Workforce 5:17 AI Is More Than A Productivity Tool 8:35 Generational Differences In AI Use 10:49 The Future of Integrating AI Agents 13:44 AI As A "Given" 17:08 Speed of Accumulating Knowledge 19:00 Ethical AI Use 21:16 What The Industry Gets Wrong About AI

Carolina Milanesi

37,076 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten