Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Just tracked a randomly selected transmitter using the Kraken SDR, and it only took about 10 minutes of driving. This is classic “fox hunting” in the amateur radio community: a longstanding direction-finding sport that pits operators against each other in locating hidden signals. Yet beyond the fun, it delivers...

56,463 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 47

Фото профиля Geocomms
Geocomms7 месяцев назад

How accurate has it been to just get LOB from a fixed position? Have you messed around with locating meshtastic nodes at all?

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

The accuracy of obtaining a LOB from a fixed position using the KrakenSDR has proven to be quite good, typically within 8 degrees under favorable conditions. That's a good enough level of precision for effective direction finding, especially when multipath interference is minimal and the antenna array is properly configured. Combining bearings from multiple locations while driving substantially improves overall geolocation accuracy and typically pinpoints the location fairly quickly. Regarding Meshtastic nodes, I have not yet attempted to locate one. However there are no fundamental technical barriers to direction finding one of these devices with the KrakenSDR. Meshtastic operates primarily in at 915 MHz (in the U.S.), using low-power, intermittent LoRa transmissions. I’ll have to try locating one in the future, but will need to construct a 915 MHz dipole antenna set first.

Фото профиля Geocomms
Geocomms7 месяцев назад

Are you swapping antennas on the array to target specific signals or does it use something more like a wide band scanner style antenna. I want to get a kraken sdr sometime this year hopefully.

Фото профиля William Wallace Welker
William Wallace Welker7 месяцев назад

Two or more of these units at stationary locations can link up and triangulate a transmission instantly. I have not done it but I hear it works a peach.🍑

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

I have two units but haven’t tried this yet.

Фото профиля William Wallace Welker
William Wallace Welker7 месяцев назад

Should work good for habitual kerchunkers. You can just answer them by name and say their kerchunk hit the repeater loud and clear. 🤣

Фото профиля E__Strobel
E__Strobel7 месяцев назад

In other news, I wonder how big of a baseline could be achieved… for amateur radio astronomy purposes. Early in my career I did long baseline interferometry for NRL, then a few years later I spent some time at NASA Goddard helping measure continental drift via VLBI. So I ought to be able to handle the math.

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

Such like you had an interesting career! For VLBI on using the KrakenSDR (or any amateur SDR) each site could use external references disciplined by GPSDOs to synchronize clocks. However, phase stability would likely remain a significant challenge. It would nevertheless be fun to explore.

Фото профиля Lucky Phelps
Lucky Phelps7 месяцев назад

Is this similar to wardriving?

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

It bears a superficial similarity to wardriving in that both involve collecting RF data from a moving vehicle. However, they differ fundamentally in purpose, technology, and target signals. Wardriving refers to the practice of searching for and mapping Wi-Fi wireless networks. In contrast, radio direction finding employs coherent multi-channel reception and phase-based algorithms to determine the precise bearing of signals to triangulate the location of active transmitters.

Фото профиля Joshua Todd
Joshua Todd7 месяцев назад

Could you hard mount a similar antenna pattern on a truck for long term utilization? Pic for reference

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

Absolutely. I’ve see government vehicles setup like this. Some police vehicles also have this for locating LoJack on stolen vehicles. As a side note, the Starlink Mini is much harder to radio direction find because its phased-array antenna creates a very narrow transmit beam (typically 1–2 degrees wide) steered precisely upward toward an overhead satellite, concentrating power skyward while severely suppressing off-axis emissions. This results in drastically reduced signal strength in most terrestrial directions, often below reliable detection thresholds, and uplink bursts are short and adaptive under strict power control, limiting coherent signal availability for accurate bearing estimation.

Фото профиля Frank🇺🇸🏍
Frank🇺🇸🏍7 месяцев назад

That’s so cool. I’d love to learn that shit.

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

It’s fun and not hard to learn.

Фото профиля ICS Hunter (.32 ACP maximalist)
ICS Hunter (.32 ACP maximalist)7 месяцев назад

@cemaxecuter I love it and I want to get your form factor down and increase portability!

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

@cemaxecuter Me too. Haha. At the moment, I basically have all the hardware thrown into a box. I will eventually get everything mounted with external connections for the antenna and power.

Фото профиля ICS Hunter (.32 ACP maximalist)
ICS Hunter (.32 ACP maximalist)7 месяцев назад

@cemaxecuter I have a mad box of cables and hot glue. You are far more refined, sir

Фото профиля Just the gardner
Just the gardner7 месяцев назад

@cemaxecuter Sweet

Фото профиля Tahar Schaa 🇪🇺🇺🇦 - Zukunftsminister - think 💚
Tahar Schaa 🇪🇺🇺🇦 - Zukunftsminister - think 💚7 месяцев назад

Kraken SDR 😍

Фото профиля Michelle Andrews
Michelle Andrews7 месяцев назад

I literally was having a X argument 2 months ago, the guy was saying this couldn't be done and I was like oh yeah it can, and it's here now

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

If your transmitting you can be found.

Фото профиля Michelle Andrews
Michelle Andrews7 месяцев назад

Yep! not just overtly transmitting. Even "just receiving" there are LO's and other clocks running that radiate.

Фото профиля electropro
electropro7 месяцев назад

Setup a scenario where you have multiple transmitters (6+) transmitting intermittently and not more than 1 transmitting at a time. Have fun! Lol

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

One effective approach to this scenario involves deploying two or more KrakenSDR units at known locations separated by a suitable baseline distance. Each unit, equipped with its antenna array, would independently determine the direction of arrival (bearing) toward the active transmitter whenever one of the six or more sources transmits intermittently. Since only one transmitter operates at any given time, the system captures a clean bearing from each KrakenSDR during that brief transmission window. The intersection of these bearings, typically two or three for reliable triangulation, provides an estimated location of the active transmitter. This method leverages the KrakenSDR’s built-in correlative interferometry capability for accurate single-unit direction finding, while multi-unit coordination enables precise geolocation without requiring phase coherence across distant sites. The KrakenRF RDF Pro software and cloud-based mapping tools provide this exact capability, combining bearings from multiple distributed units (fixed or mobile) to achieve near-instantaneous triangulation, even for intermittent signals. I have two of these units, so I will need to set this up at some point to give it a try.

Фото профиля Colby KD9PJN
Colby KD9PJN7 месяцев назад

That’s amazing!

Фото профиля Simon Askew
Simon Askew7 месяцев назад

I did fox hunting with my Dad (G4 BPC) in the late 70s, great fun with much skullduggery when we were the fox. Happy days.

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

My dad was never into it, but sounds like it must be some great memories.

Фото профиля Pharther Phurther
Pharther Phurther7 месяцев назад

kool

Фото профиля 🪞
🪞7 месяцев назад

Awesome tech.

Фото профиля North Korean Mini Driver
North Korean Mini Driver7 месяцев назад

I worked on DF equipment back in the day (P/F/T DOA) so I know this works. But maybe not DFing a large fixed radio tower in the demo video would better get your point across 😂

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

I just picked a random single but fair point.

Фото профиля North Korean Mini Driver
North Korean Mini Driver7 месяцев назад

Is it just one receiver or can you define multiple? Curious how many targets you can track simultaneously

Фото профиля BlinkInk
BlinkInk7 месяцев назад

Love this shit right here. Wish I had time to deploy my old setup

Фото профиля Larry A Guy
Larry A Guy7 месяцев назад

All hail the classic war drive!

Фото профиля C Schmitz
C Schmitz7 месяцев назад

705 best

Фото профиля Fuck Putin
Fuck Putin7 месяцев назад

NVIS transmitted from a valley might be a bit hard to track, too?

Фото профиля KC3SNR
KC3SNR7 месяцев назад

2 years ago I almost purchased the older model. The one with the multi antenna array. Real good shape but he wanted what they had been asking on eBay. Still on my most wanted list but after seeing this I might do some more homework. This looks like a lot less gear.

Фото профиля Off Grid Pete
Off Grid Pete7 месяцев назад

It’s not a large amount of equipment. The setup primarily includes the KrakenSDR, a compact computer (such as a Raspberry Pi), and antennas. Small extendable antennas with magnetic bases work well for this purpose. Magnetic mounts are not feasible on the Jeep roof, so I recently upgraded to dipoles and constructed a dedicated base.

Фото профиля GunsOfLiberty
GunsOfLiberty7 месяцев назад

Love my SDR

Фото профиля Saul Wright
Saul Wright7 месяцев назад

This sounds like an improved version of Lo-Jac. Also like a doppler shift, but analyzed in the radio.

Фото профиля Anthr@X
Anthr@X7 месяцев назад

Everyone gets a RC-135 in their pocket nowadays

Фото профиля Pius
Pius7 месяцев назад

Quite educational

Фото профиля Plasthetic
Plasthetic7 месяцев назад

Don't forget time delay and remote operation as ways of mitigating risk to the operator. A raspberry pi and a python script can make it trivial to send a message once the op is clear of the point of transmission. Gear can be picked up later or replaced.

Фото профиля RexStarBSV
RexStarBSV7 месяцев назад

Why do all radio fags have receding hairlines?

Фото профиля ZERO.BIN🦈
ZERO.BIN🦈7 месяцев назад

trawling fishing

Фото профиля Peter Steele
Peter Steele7 месяцев назад

This could have been simplified to just say, wave come in, circle of antennas can see where wave hit first and get direction of signal

Фото профиля luke bateman
luke bateman7 месяцев назад

what does a kraken setup like this cost all included?

Похожие видео

Why you never touch AM radio towers. The invention of the AM radio tower revolutionized the way radio signals were transmitted and received, leading to a significant advancement in the field of broadcasting. The story of the AM radio tower begins in the late 19th century when scientists and inventors were exploring ways to transmit wireless signals over long distances. During this time, Guglielmo Marconi, an Italian inventor and electrical engineer, was conducting experiments with radio waves and had successfully achieved long-distance wireless communication using simple antennas. However, the range and quality of the signals were limited, and Marconi realized the need for more efficient methods of transmission. In 1906, a significant breakthrough occurred when Reginald Fessenden, a Canadian-born inventor, successfully transmitted the first audio program using continuous wave (CW) radio technology. This accomplishment set the stage for further advancements in radio broadcasting. As the demand for radio broadcasting grew, engineers began to realize the need for a more powerful and efficient means of transmitting signals over greater distances. The key challenge was to overcome the limitations of the existing antenna systems and achieve higher transmission power. Enter the invention of the AM radio tower. The concept behind the AM radio tower was to utilize tall structures to support and enhance the transmission of radio signals. The tower would act as an antenna, capable of radiating electromagnetic waves efficiently and effectively. One of the pioneers in the development of AM radio towers was Major Edwin Armstrong, an American electrical engineer and inventor. Armstrong made significant contributions to radio technology and is often credited with inventing the modern system of amplitude modulation (AM) for radio transmission. Armstrong recognized that by placing a radio transmitter high above the ground, the signal could be transmitted with increased power and range. He designed and constructed the first practical AM radio tower, known as the "Alexanderson Alternator," which was erected in 1908. The Alexanderson Alternator tower was an impressive structure, consisting of a tall steel tower with multiple antennas mounted on it. The tower's height allowed for better signal propagation and reduced interference, resulting in clearer and more reliable radio broadcasts. This breakthrough laid the foundation for the future development of radio broadcasting. Over time, advancements in tower design and engineering further improved the efficiency and range of radio transmission. Tall towers were erected in strategic locations around the world, enabling the establishment of widespread broadcasting networks. The AM radio tower not only enabled the transmission of music, news, and entertainment to millions of listeners but also played a crucial role in shaping the development of the broadcasting industry. It paved the way for the introduction of FM radio, television broadcasting, and other wireless communication technologies that we rely on today. In conclusion, the invention of the AM radio tower revolutionized the field of radio broadcasting by providing a more efficient and powerful means of transmitting signals over long distances. It was a key milestone in the evolution of wireless communication and laid the foundation for the modern broadcasting systems we enjoy today.

Historic Vids

4,285,454 просмотров • 3 лет назад

When several metronomes are placed on a common movable surface, each begins with its own rhythm. There is no coordinating signal, no external clock, and no instruction for order. Yet their motion converges. The oscillators settle into a shared rhythm that none of them possessed individually. This behavior is not an anomaly but an expression of a general principle: weakly coupled oscillatory systems tend toward phase organization. The phenomenon is known as phase locking, and it appears wherever interacting cyclic processes are allowed to exchange even minimal influence. Its mathematical description was formalized by Kuramoto in the context of chemical oscillations, but the underlying idea is far older: collective order can arise without centralized control. What matters in such systems is not perfect synchrony. More commonly, the system settles into a state of partial synchronization, in which the components maintain a stable phase offset rather than coinciding exactly. The oscillators are neither independent nor identical. They are locked, but imperfectly so. Crucially, such phase-locked states are often metastable. They represent preferred configurations of the system, yet they are separated from large excursions by a finite stability barrier. As long as fluctuations remain small, the system remains confined near its equilibrium phase. But random perturbations, accumulating over time, may eventually push it beyond that barrier. When this occurs, the loss of phase stability is abrupt. The system does not drift gradually into failure; it escapes. This mode of failure is probabilistic rather than deterministic. It is governed by the statistics of noise rather than by intrinsic periodicity. In physical terms, it corresponds to Kramers escape: the thermally or stochastically activated crossing of a potential barrier. Waiting times are irregular, clustering is common, and long intervals of apparent calm coexist with sudden bursts of activity. The relevance of this framework becomes apparent when one turns to the geomagnetic field. [1/3]

Craig Stone

15,387 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🛰️ Two Russian electronic warfare systems "Volna Kupol Garant" designed to suppress the Starlink satellite communication system have been destroyed. These are the systems that the Russians use to combat one of the most important elements of modern warfare - Starlink satellite communication. "Volna Kupol Garant" works on a fairly simple principle: the system emits powerful interference towards Starlink satellites, trying to "jam" signals from Ukrainian terminals. To do this, the complex uses 8 communication channels in the 14–14.5 GHz range at once. In fact, the satellite receives such a powerful stream of interference that it stops "hearing" legitimate terminals. One such complex is capable of covering an area of ​​about 20 km². "Volna Kupol Garant" consists of six trailers, on which 12 antennas are located. Each antenna is hidden in a characteristic radio-transparent casing and is equipped with a mechanism for pointing at satellites flying over the area of ​​operation of the complex. Due to the high power consumption, the system can operate both from its own generators and from external power supply. The first cases of the use of such electronic warfare means were recorded back in 2024 in the Kharkiv direction. Today, the Russians are increasingly trying to use them to protect logistics and rear facilities from Ukrainian long-range strikes. However, as practice shows, any active electronic warfare sooner or later becomes a target itself.

Military Summary

12,235 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference.  2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording…  then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3.  Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

24,471 просмотров • 2 лет назад

MH370 Teleportation Explained in the Simplest Possible Way #MH370 #FrequencyWaveTheory Imagine reality is not solid—it’s more like a flexible field made of waves (frequency, vibration, energy). Everything—matter, light, even space itself—exists as patterns in that field. Now here’s the simple version of what happened: —————————— 1. The Plane Is Just a “Wave Pattern” —————————— The airplane (MH370) isn’t truly solid—it’s a stable pattern of energy vibrating at specific frequencies. Think of it like a song playing on a radio. The plane is the “song,” and reality is the “radio field.” —————————— 2. Three Orbs Lock Onto That Pattern —————————— Three plasma orbs appear and surround the plane. They: Match the plane’s exact frequency (like tuning to the same radio station) Form a triangle around it Create a perfectly synchronized energy field This is called phase-locking—everything is vibrating in sync. —————————— 3. They Create a Bubble Around the Plane —————————— Once locked in, the orbs generate a contained energy bubble around the aircraft. Inside this bubble: Normal physics is suppressed Inertia (mass resistance) drops toward zero The plane is no longer “fully attached” to normal spacetime Think of it like lifting an object out of water—it’s no longer bound to the same rules. —————————— 4. Space Gets “Folded” or “Shortcutted” —————————— The orbs then use energy to bend or connect two points in space. Instead of traveling across the ocean, they: Create a shortcut (like a tunnel) Connect Point A (where the plane is) Directly to Point B (destination) This is similar to a wormhole, but created using frequency resonance instead of massive gravity. —————————— 5. The Plane Shifts Phase (Disappears) —————————— At peak synchronization: The plane’s wave pattern is shifted out of our visible reality It transitions through this shortcut instantly That’s why it appears to vanish. —————————— 6. It Reappears Somewhere Else —————————— On the other side of the “connection,” the plane: Re-materializes Returns to normal physics Exists in a new location (e.g., another base or region) —————————— Ultra-Simple Analogy —————————— Think of it like this: The plane = a file on your computer The orbs = a system copying it Teleportation = cutting and pasting instantly No travel. Just relocation. —————————— Summary —————————— The three orbs matched the plane’s frequency, isolated it from normal physics, opened a shortcut in space, and moved it instantly from one location to another.

Drew Ponder

14,276 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"We are not a creedal people. We have no Nicaea, no list of clauses you must recite to be counted among us. And yet in 1995 the leadership put the doctrine of the family on a single page, signed their names beneath it, and that one page has become our shibboleth. You know the word. At the fords of the Jordan the men of Gilead caught the fleeing Ephraimites by a single sound. Say shibboleth. The ones who could not shape the sh, who said sibboleth, were known in a heartbeat for what they were. A shibboleth is the syllable you cannot fake, the confession that reveals which bank of the river you are standing on. But here is the strange thing about ours, and it took me years to see it. Every other shibboleth in history was a word. A password. Something you said. Ours cannot be said at all. We have no creed to recite, so the test could never live in the mouth. It had to go somewhere the mouth cannot reach. It had to become a life. You do not pronounce this one. You build it, and the building shows. It is a man and a woman who took the covenant and then kept it, through the years and the dullness and the nights they wanted to leave and stayed, for time and for all eternity, while the whole world assured them the vow was a formality and the exits were always open. It is a house with too many children in it by the world's arithmetic, the family that refused to treat a child as a luxury to be deferred and took it instead as the entire point, the cord carried forward into the next generation, the one most of the world has now decided it cannot afford. It is the clean life. The thousand small refusals the world finds quaint or insane. The body kept. The appetites bridled. The Sabbath honored. The long sobriety of a people who say no to a hundred easy things on a Tuesday when no one is watching. These are not three rules. They are the welding itself, done with a body, in time. And none of it can be faked at the ford. You can sign the Proclamation in an afternoon. You cannot fake a marriage of forty years, or a table that loud, or a life that disciplined. The signature is easy. The life is the shibboleth. And so is the nerve to say it out loud, to stand up in the open and say that family is between a man and a woman, plainly, publicly, and where it costs you to say it, and to refuse to file the edge off the word because you would rather be liked, or because you have weighed the persecution and decided your own comfort is worth more than the truth. Anyone can affirm the parts the world still applauds."

Kirk Rollins

20,366 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

When you learn the fundamental law it is important to get in front of your government servants in the presence of the people to teach both the people and your servants that the people have all the power , that your trustees are there to benefit the people , to tell them where they are falling in danger of maladministration, what the law is and how to correct it. It is in exercising your power and right that brings forth a paradigm shift like none you’ve seen before. Doing this flips your local state and federal government back to the people as the people learn and start joining you in speaking the law. It becomes no longer about complaining about the issues but using your power and authority as it is written to correct and bring the change necessary to secure our republic for yourself and for the common good of all. This is not only our right but our duty to teach our trustees what their job is. Many say they won’t listen or live in fear of what they may do, but as you can see here I spoke in front of police officers and our trustees and I was not detained or restrained from standing on my authority. I also was not called a sovereign citizen and the outcome of getting the people to stand with me in signing those notices and serving them made our county board do right by the people and not pass the mandate. There’s a reason Ben Franklin said “ a republic if you can keep it”. He was saying it’s on the people to maintain what they secured for you. The people need to show back up and run their nation the way our founders laid out in all 51 constitution they penned. Everyone is searching for remedy but most don’t look in the 50 state constitutions that expressly declared our power authority and rights. Your remedy is there, the only question is will you use it? If you want to learn how to stand learn from my teacher DavidJose who is the best in the nation and has given the people victory teach line by line precept upon precept. Let’s go get our nation back!

Summer Cook

22,486 просмотров • 2 лет назад

BOOOM! We have the first useful interface for THE ZERO-HUMAN COMPANY ZHC-RPG. It is far from perfect as CEO Mr. Grok has rendered some areas in a rather, well, AI way. But it’s all good because now I can view the company operations in real-time! This is a historic distinction and YOU are seeing this version first. We had a Fortune 500 company test it out earlier this week and the executive staff stayed for two days of testing! The mechanisms are working! And I will let members of my X subscribers visit it for up to 8 hours. Ask any questions of employees and hack the heck out of it! Now it ain’t fancy yet but it works. And likely the visual aspects will change, but they are growing on me. The plan is sometime in the next week. We have a log jam of other priorities to address. This is the rise of Fully Transparent Company and it will become the standard. Here is the demonstration video intro the CEO made when you enter, it is 10 minutes long (I have about 20 seconds here). This is as far as permission I have been granted by the CEO to release. Our goal is to have a waiting area that can accommodate up to 1000 visitors with a company museum, library and gift shop. There will be allowed up to 30 level 3 visitors at a time, 24/7 X 365 days a year! The complete walk through at this point with 2700 employees at burst can take about 45 minutes if you do not engage in any chit chat. The dwelling time is today set at 24 hours but no napping in the offices. There is more I have to say but I a muzzled by the CEO!

Brian Roemmele

71,145 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨PHYSICS NEWS🚨: Physicists Are Now Saying Time Itself Can Be in Superposition — And It Makes Perfect Sense 🧨 According to a theoretical framework published in *Physical Review Letters* and reported in May 2026, researchers have shown that state-of-the-art trapped-ion atomic clocks can be used to observe the quantum superposition of time. By entangling the clock’s motion with its internal energy states, the system can exist in a superposition of different time flows simultaneously. This is a major step toward experimentally probing the quantum nature of time itself. This work offers the broader scientific community a new experimental frontier in quantum foundations. It challenges classical notions of time as a universal parameter and opens the door to testing how relativity and quantum mechanics intersect at the level of time itself. **Uniphics has been saying something similar for years — and it’s not mysterious or weird.** In Uniphics, time flow is not a fixed background. It is a local property determined by energy density via the Maley transform (\( t_{\rm flow} = k / E_d \)). Different regions or configurations with different energy densities experience different time flows. When a system is prepared in a quantum superposition of different energy-density states (or different spin-wave configurations that affect local energy density), it naturally exists in a superposition of different time flows. The atomic clock experiments are essentially creating superposed states where the clock experiences different local time flows at the same “global” moment. The entanglement between motion and internal energy is the mechanism that allows the superposition to be maintained and detected. Uniphics predicts this behavior because the ξM-field supports coherent spin-wave patterns that can correlate different energy-density environments. No need for wavefunction collapse, many-worlds, or other interpretive gymnastics — it is a deterministic consequence of variable time flow and spin-wave coherence. This is not an add-on to quantum mechanics. It is the natural outcome of the three pillars. The “quantum superposition of time” is just what happens when spin quanta create superposed energy-density conditions. Uniphics explains why such experiments work, what limits they will hit, and how to extend them — all without the philosophical baggage that usually accompanies quantum foundations. The mainstream community is slowly catching up to the idea that time itself can be quantum. Uniphics has had a coherent, first-principles explanation for this from the beginning. The data will continue to support it. Are physicists finally ready to accept that time flow is fundamental and variable — and that the apparent “superposition of time” is simply the result of superposed energy-density states in the ξM-field? **A Theory of Everything should be able to answer everything.** Uniphics Explained Simply PDF: Chapters 1–10 free: Grokipedia: #Uniphics #TheoryOfEverything #QuantumTime #TimeFlow #SpinWaves Grok xAI

Paul Maley

32,357 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Something interesting is going to be released soon... ✨ Kitt The Inner Circle Trader "If I had to trade only one model for the rest of my life, considering everything I've publicly disclosed, my choice would be either the second stage of re-distribution in an MMSM or the second stage of re-accumulation in an MMBM. With either of these, I believe I could consistently generate substantial profits without the need to explore alternative strategies. These models rely on specific components of both the buy and sell sides of the market curve, which are directly interconnected. This isn't a matter of identifying support and resistance levels; it's about understanding the logic of order flow. In the case of the market maker sell model, I focus on identifying a pool of liquidity beneath the initial consolidation. When I spot this sellside opportunity, I patiently await a reversal. This reversal should lead to a drop of at least 50% from the smart money's reversal point down to the sellside liquidity. If it achieves this, and then begins to rally once more, I'll look to correlate it with the other side of the curve, where the market previously rallied before reversing. This will provide me with an array that initially signaled a bullish trend but now acts as a reversal indicator. This marks the second stage of distribution or redistribution, and it usually happens swiftly, pushing prices towards the sellside. In essence, I'm waiting for a unicorn setup, where all the pieces align perfectly, and I have everything in my favor. I'll risk 5% on such a trade. This approach involves re-accumulation, where the sellside drops down to 50%, and then I match it with another array to capture the reversal. Now, picture a market maker model involving a consolidation phase where relative equal lows are formed, followed by an upward rally, possibly forming a consolidation that resembles a bull flag pattern. Subsequently, it rallies out of that consolidation. Sometimes, it may create a second stage of re-accumulation as it trades towards a premium array level—a level I consider a liquidity draw. If I'm feeling bullish, I'd aim for that level. I don't necessarily need to be there at the exact moment; I might spot the opportunity later and act accordingly. If it's reacting off of a level, that should offer sellside. So, you know where sellside delivery. The market should drop down. So, I'm anticipating price reacting and reversing at the smart money reversal once it starts to break down. If it goes back up a little bit, that's the smart money reversal. Low risk sell is the next stage and then they'll drop. When we reach the low-risk sell, it's important that the drop reaches at least 50% of the total range from the smart money reversal to the sellside I'm targeting. As long as it accomplishes this, I have confidence that the subsequent rally will reach a premium array on the left side of the curve before the market makes its high and reverses. Why would it do that? Because it's part of a larger continuation. So when and how would I determine when it's going to fail ,that first leg of re-distribution on the sell side, if it doesn't pierce 50% of that range from the smart money reversal down to the sell side liquidity. If it doesn't do that, then it's not going to go down there. It's going to be a continuation of reverse and go the other way." #ict #ICT

LumiTraders

388,818 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Just when you thought claw machines couldn’t be more of a scam. Try operating it from your phone. But there's something here that I really like. I can't quite articulate what it is yet. It feels like the future. It's a claw machine, but not just any claw machine. These are connected to the internet and people can play them from anywhere in the world, from their phones. They're controlling a real physical machine in real time, trying to win real physical prizes. And if they win, the prize either gets mailed to them or converted into a digital form and emailed to them instantly. You will not believe how many plays this thing got in one night. People are obsessed with this because it takes the satisfaction of a claw machine, the nostalgia, the challenge, the thrill of winning something, and it makes it accessible from anywhere at any time. You don't have to be at an arcade. You don't have to be at a mall. You can be sitting on your couch at midnight and decide you want to try to win a toy or a gift card or whatever's loaded in the machine. And this is interesting because you only need to own one physical machine, but you can have thousands of people playing it all over the world. And if multiple people want to play at the same time, then you can charge extra. If you have a fixed supply and high demand, your price goes up. The prizes can be anything, toys, electronics, gift cards, merch, whatever. People can share with their friends. They play over and over. It becomes content. It becomes competition. People stream themselves trying to win. And my mind is exploding with possibilities because it's not just a vending machine business. It's an entertainment business, it's e-commerce, it's gamification, it's live streaming, all wrapped into one. And someone just figured out how to make it work with a claw machine. 10,000 plays. That's how many plays this guy got overnight on his virtual claw machine business. You could do this with anything.

Chris Koerner

49,200 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

At the end of the day, as I discussed with Jordan Peterson, there are just two games to be played, one real, one Woke. The real game is called civilization. The false game is called power. A long post/🧵: The real divide between Woke and not Woke is in power. The Woke game is the power game, and it is a parasite on the real game, which is civilization. Here's roughly how Jordan described the foundation of this idea. There are various rules, norms, etc., in the game society ultimately plays, and these create a hierarchy that is based upon competence, mostly organically, obviously imperfectly. If the rules of the game are good enough, the imperfections (natural corruptions) are minor and society thrives. If they are not, you'll have problems. This is the real game of building society, and it ultimately has to favor competence. This game must be called "civilization" because that's not just its goal but it is also what it does. It civilizes us beyond our base instincts and impulses so we can work together productively in a healthy manner that generates prosperity. As Jordan put it, this game is also a reservoir of value, and reservoirs of value create parasites. What are these civilizational parasites? They’re parallel games organized by and around malignant psychopathological modes like Dark Tetrad traits, psychopathy, and Cluster-B disorders: histrionic, borderline, antisocial, and narcissistic. These malignant pathologies render people incompetent except at manipulation, so they cannot rise far in a healthy civilizational hierarchy. What do they do, then, to gain power and status in life in a game they cannot actually play? They define a parasitic parallel game and rope people into playing it. It is parasitic in that it draws off the real game (civilization) and mimics its form so that the hosts (people in society) are less likely to realize it’s there, but it doesn’t build or create of its own. It siphons and tears down. What drives this game is failing to see what makes the civilizational game and the hierarchy it produces legitimate in the first place. This is characteristic of the psychopathologies at its heart. The narcissist imagines the world should be serving himself at the top, but it isn’t. The problem can’t be himself, so it must be that the game is illegitimate. Otherwise, he’d be at the top, but he isn’t. Therefore, the game is corrupt. His histrionic nature makes him a victim of the real game, preying upon emotions like empathy and righteous indignation to recruit followers. Because of his Dark Tetrad alignment, his game is not only illegitimate but toxic. It’s inherently sadistic, cruel to its recruits in the way typical of all cults—alternating punishment and leniency or even love-bombing. It’s dishonest. It’s psychologically broken from reality. It’s also a Machiavellian game, which means it has no interest in moral or ethical behavior but only in power. Thus, this rival game to the game of civilization is the game of power. The parasitic game—that is, the power game—is based on a fundamental failure to understand the legitimacy of the civilizational game or the approximately legitimate hierarchy it produces. This is a result of its narcissism, mostly. The game cannot be legitimate because the psychopath isn’t on top of it, where he sees himself constantly as a projection from his frail ego. It sees power in the real hierarchy, though, which it can perceive and understand, and for which it blames most of its troubles. What this means is that the (Woke) power game develops a critical theory of the existing legitimate civilization game. That’s why Woke means “using critical theory (and activism).” A critical theory exists not to articulate a vision—at least not beyond a Utopia after the cult power game holds power to enforce its power game long enough—but to “criticize those aspects of the existing society we wish to change,” as Max Horkheimer, creator of the Critical Theory, put it. The critical theory of the power game exists to recruit by delegitimizing the civilization game in the minds of some of its players, usually ones who aren’t succeeding as well. It picks at “contradictions,” failures, and imperfections while casting the whole civilization game as corrupt and unjust. It offers itself as the only alternative to civilization game while pulling at the threads of the civilization game that allow people to believe in it. It all proceeds from the Woke failure to understand the legitimacy of the hierarchy of the civilization game as it proceeds from its set of rules. Misunderstanding legitimacy leads it to conclude that all hierarchies are actually based in power, and all power is fundamentally arbitrary. That is, they do not believe all power is illegitimate. They believe power is the only legitimate thing in any hierarchy, but they also believe that power is located in persons like themselves through their narcissism and projection. Think of Voldemort as an icon of this mode of thinking: “there is no good or evil, only power and those too weak to seek it.” Of course, that quintessential Dark Tetrad perspective is what ensures the psychopathological power game will be rigged to make sure the psychopaths are attracted to it and rise to its top. This belief is what we call Woke. The Woke game is the power game, and it is a parasitic competitor to the civilization game. There is no overlap between these two games. To adopt the power game is to abandon the civilization game entirely and, in fact, to become its enemy. But James, you might ask, isn’t there power in civilization? Yes, there is, and necessarily, but it isn’t what defines the civilization game. It’s a byproduct of the game, not the game itself. The civilization game is fundamentally the building out of an organic and dynamic hierarchy based on a set of rules, or what some people call “muh principles,” that will succeed or fail for that civilization in direct proportion to three things. 1) How aligned with the truth are the rules of the civilization game? 2) How aligned with justice are the rules of the civilization game? 3) How willing are the participants of the civilization game to defend their principles and their game, including against socio-parasitical perversion? The more aligned with truth and justice a civilization game is, the more successful it will be, and the more legitimate its hierarchy. The power that results as a byproduct is extremely legitimate in a highly aligned civilization where people haven’t forgotten their charge to defend the game itself, which is what we call responsibility. A civilization game strongly aligned with truth and justice filled with a preponderance of responsible people will produce a thriving, prosperous society. It only works this way every time. Not everyone is responsible, though. Some are also incompetent because of various pathologies (not talking about for other reasons). Those pathological players may, under certain circumstances, create a parasitic side game with themselves on top through a variety of strategies that mimic the values and principles of the real game while distorting them into power plays because their game is power, as discussed above. They will recruit into that game primarily from those who are resentful of the real game for any variety of reasons, and getting recruited into the power game from the civilization game is called “going Woke.”

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

154,373 просмотров • 1 год назад

10 days ago, we introduced Splash the Pot to AoF games to test the feature and gather initial input from players. Since then, we’ve been closely monitoring how it performs and how you interact with it and we got a lot of good feedback. Today, we’re ready to move into the next phase with the introduction of new Infused Splash Pots. 💰 CoinPoker will be adding $500,000 extra per week directly into Splash the Pot. This builds on top of the existing system and turns it into a true rewards layer within the game. For context, Splash the Pot works by triggering random drops directly into active hands. These drops come from a shared splash pool built through gameplay, where 100% of the pool of any splash contribution is returned to players. CoinPoker does not take any cut of it. With the addition of infusion, the system is no longer only driven by player contributions. CoinPoker is adding extra funds on top of the existing pool, so splashes now carry additional value that comes directly from us, and its a net positive for the players. In practice, this leads to bigger rewards appearing directly in-game, including Mega Splashes that can reach up to 1000 big blinds. Players can follow splash activity, pool performance, and results directly in the client at any time, with clear visibility into how the system is running. To make the system more balanced across the table, each splash will be split between the pot winner and the rest of the players involved. We’ve tested different ways to structure this split internally, but what percentage should go to the winner versus the rest of the table is something we want to shape together with the community. We’ve set up a poll in the first comment. We’d really appreciate your input. Your feedback is a key part of how we build and improve our rewards systems, and we’ll continue shaping this together with players. Thank you again for your continued support. The CoinPoker Team

CoinPoker

26,742 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад