Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Justified Anger or Brazen Intimidation? A heated confrontation inside a government office has become the talk of Odisha's political and administrative circles. BJP leader and actor Arindam Roy clashed sharply with a senior officer (ABDO), and the viral video is now fuelling a bigger question. Was this a legitimate... outburst by a ruling party representative, or a calculated attempt to bully and intimidate an official? Arindam didn't stop at accusations. His aggressive tone, finger-pointing, and blunt remarks like "How much PC are you eating?" left the officer visibly shaken. Democracy certainly has space for protest and strong voices, but there must be a Lakshman Rekha. Government officers are also human beings who deserve basic respect and dignity. This episode is now a test for the police and the administrative system: how they handle this "political hungama" will say a lot about where the lines are drawn in practice. #Odishashow more

Soumyajit Pattnaik

55,063 subscribers

22,373 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

FULL LENGTH AMERICAN LEVIATHAN DOCUMENTARY. Why is it imperative that we dismantle the Administrative State now? Why must DOGE be successful? We are at a singular moment in American history where President Donald J. Trump, who has the moral and political courage necessary, can unmake the unConstitutional State and restore representative government to this country and end the rule of the bureaucrat. This documentary is to help you understand that the rule of the bureaucrat was always intended by the Progressive Statists for the last century. It is also to help you understand that the Administrative State is the enemy of the Republic and representative government. And while many Americans don't think they can play a role in ending this unConstitutional form of government, you absolutely can: once you are aware and awake, and demand your elected officials govern once again, and represent you, it is the beginning of the end of administrative power.

FULL LENGTH AMERICAN LEVIATHAN DOCUMENTARY. Why is it imperative that we dismantle the Administrative State now? Why must DOGE be successful? We are at a singular moment in American history where President Donald J. Trump, who has the moral and political courage necessary, can unmake the unConstitutional State and restore representative government to this country and end the rule of the bureaucrat. This documentary is to help you understand that the rule of the bureaucrat was always intended by the Progressive Statists for the last century. It is also to help you understand that the Administrative State is the enemy of the Republic and representative government. And while many Americans don't think they can play a role in ending this unConstitutional form of government, you absolutely can: once you are aware and awake, and demand your elected officials govern once again, and represent you, it is the beginning of the end of administrative power.

Ned Ryun

911,076 views • 1 year ago

A teen who was assaulted and slammed by a Warren police officer during booking has filed a $50 million lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed this week by Fieger Law. Matthew Rodriguez, 48, an officer with 14 years on the force, was charged Friday with assault and battery charges. Warren police announced Monday that he had been fired According to the lawsuit, the teen suffered physical and mental damage due to excessive force, and the city of Warren failed to properly train the officer. "Officer Matthew, with the specific intent to intimidate and/or harass Plaintiff, as a result of his race and/or ethnicity, caused physical contact with Plaintiff by striking him in the head and/or face with a fist and pulling him off the ground by his hair," the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit also says that the two other officers in the video failed to intervene and help the teen. “This is one of the most flagrant cases of police misconduct I’ve seen in my entire career as a trial attorney. The sheer violence and disregard for human life that these three officers showed is despicable and cannot be tolerated," said James Harrington of Fieger Law. The incident happened early this week at the Warren police department. The video shows the officer punching and grabbing the 19-year-old by his locs before slamming & launching him into his cell. Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer says an investigation was launched after the two officers in the video stepped up and told a supervisor about the incident. One officer was telling Rodriguez "That's enough" multiple times in an attempt to make the officer stop, Dwyer said. At first, they did not know why the officer was attacking him. Within a week, the officer was arrested, charged, and put on unpaid administrative leave, said Dwyer. The officer in the video also was out of policy and was not wearing bodycam. The officer has a lengthy history of alleged accessive force. He currently has two pending lawsuits.

A teen who was assaulted and slammed by a Warren police officer during booking has filed a $50 million lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed this week by Fieger Law. Matthew Rodriguez, 48, an officer with 14 years on the force, was charged Friday with assault and battery charges. Warren police announced Monday that he had been fired According to the lawsuit, the teen suffered physical and mental damage due to excessive force, and the city of Warren failed to properly train the officer. "Officer Matthew, with the specific intent to intimidate and/or harass Plaintiff, as a result of his race and/or ethnicity, caused physical contact with Plaintiff by striking him in the head and/or face with a fist and pulling him off the ground by his hair," the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit also says that the two other officers in the video failed to intervene and help the teen. “This is one of the most flagrant cases of police misconduct I’ve seen in my entire career as a trial attorney. The sheer violence and disregard for human life that these three officers showed is despicable and cannot be tolerated," said James Harrington of Fieger Law. The incident happened early this week at the Warren police department. The video shows the officer punching and grabbing the 19-year-old by his locs before slamming & launching him into his cell. Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer says an investigation was launched after the two officers in the video stepped up and told a supervisor about the incident. One officer was telling Rodriguez "That's enough" multiple times in an attempt to make the officer stop, Dwyer said. At first, they did not know why the officer was attacking him. Within a week, the officer was arrested, charged, and put on unpaid administrative leave, said Dwyer. The officer in the video also was out of policy and was not wearing bodycam. The officer has a lengthy history of alleged accessive force. He currently has two pending lawsuits.

Music is Life

1,891,964 views • 1 year ago

There is a video of a that is gaining attention and the Lynn Police Dept have had to publish a statement. You watch the video and tell me if this looks like an overdose or a "medical emergency." This is the same department that arrested a ex-Swampscott police officer for a DUI and fired for "supplying cocaine" to other officers at the Lynn PD. There was also talk of 'perc 30's." His DUI charge was eventually dismissed. This is all under the Essex County DA's office. Full Short Video On YouTube:

There is a video of a that is gaining attention and the Lynn Police Dept have had to publish a statement. You watch the video and tell me if this looks like an overdose or a "medical emergency." This is the same department that arrested a ex-Swampscott police officer for a DUI and fired for "supplying cocaine" to other officers at the Lynn PD. There was also talk of 'perc 30's." His DUI charge was eventually dismissed. This is all under the Essex County DA's office. Full Short Video On YouTube:

Mass Accountability

68,536 views • 1 year ago

Joe Rogan: "Joining a political party or being in a political party like ideologically in your head is not good for you. There are a lot of things that people who are on the right that I agree with and there's a lot of things that people on the left believe and I agree with. I refuse to be a part of this left versus right thing."

Joe Rogan: "Joining a political party or being in a political party like ideologically in your head is not good for you. There are a lot of things that people who are on the right that I agree with and there's a lot of things that people on the left believe and I agree with. I refuse to be a part of this left versus right thing."

Joe Rogan Podcast News

44,890 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Durgapur, West Bengal | BJP MP Saumitra Khan says, "... Some TMC members from IPAC are asking the counting officers, both from the Central Government and the State Government on WhatsApp to send them their documents and that their ID card will be attached to the document. This is fake. The person who will be at the counting table, has to personally go to the strong room, where they bind the ID card themselves... But throughout West Bengal, there is a fake officer who has the ID card of a Central Government officer and in many places, they are using contract labour... This will enable duplicity of votes... I request that close attention be paid to this, a videography be done and the report should be sent to the central office... Many ROs and District Magistrates in West Bengal are playing this game here... 60 officers in Bankura were called and told to send their documents via WhatsApp... This is happening in every district, every district..."

#WATCH | Durgapur, West Bengal | BJP MP Saumitra Khan says, "... Some TMC members from IPAC are asking the counting officers, both from the Central Government and the State Government on WhatsApp to send them their documents and that their ID card will be attached to the document. This is fake. The person who will be at the counting table, has to personally go to the strong room, where they bind the ID card themselves... But throughout West Bengal, there is a fake officer who has the ID card of a Central Government officer and in many places, they are using contract labour... This will enable duplicity of votes... I request that close attention be paid to this, a videography be done and the report should be sent to the central office... Many ROs and District Magistrates in West Bengal are playing this game here... 60 officers in Bankura were called and told to send their documents via WhatsApp... This is happening in every district, every district..."

ANI

35,653 views • 5 months ago

People in Nuristan say the war has been going on for a long time with no government help, and there is a food crisis now. They talk about how a bag of flour costs 8,000 and how sellers are charging high prices, yet the Taliban are taking no action.

People in Nuristan say the war has been going on for a long time with no government help, and there is a food crisis now. They talk about how a bag of flour costs 8,000 and how sellers are charging high prices, yet the Taliban are taking no action.

Mohsin Ali

25,645 views • 6 months ago

Today’s developments highlight a stark difference in our political culture. In #KhyberPakhtunkhwa, the PPP’s political activities are too often met with obstruction and undue force, while CM KP Sohail Afridi was welcomed in Sindh with courtesy and respect. This is not a matter of provincial competition; it is a question of political maturity and responsible leadership. The #PPP has consistently demonstrated that political disagreement can be managed through dialogue, tolerance, and respect. The KP government should reflect on it, and if there is a willingness to learn, the PPP has already offered a practical demonstration of what political maturity looks like.

Today’s developments highlight a stark difference in our political culture. In #KhyberPakhtunkhwa, the PPP’s political activities are too often met with obstruction and undue force, while CM KP Sohail Afridi was welcomed in Sindh with courtesy and respect. This is not a matter of provincial competition; it is a question of political maturity and responsible leadership. The #PPP has consistently demonstrated that political disagreement can be managed through dialogue, tolerance, and respect. The KP government should reflect on it, and if there is a willingness to learn, the PPP has already offered a practical demonstration of what political maturity looks like.

Faisal Karim Kundi

28,016 views • 9 months ago

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

26,693 views • 4 months ago

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Gannon

194,555 views • 3 months ago

That's how a senior IAS officer in J&K — Administrative Secretary, Labour & Employment — dealt with a woman KAS officer who wouldn't be shouted down in front of a room full of officers. He raised his voice. She raised her dignity. He reached for the only weapon a bully in office has: her job. This is a grown man with a Secretary's chair threatening a woman's career because she asked to be allowed to finish a sentence. She was composed. She was clear. She didn't flinch. That is what dignity and self respect looks like. He is what a problem looks like. This is what abrogation of Art 370 has brought upon us. An assault on dignity at every level. Even the officers in administration behave like conquerors. Office of LG J&K Atal Dulloo — if she is touched for holding her dignity, it will have consequences.

That's how a senior IAS officer in J&K — Administrative Secretary, Labour & Employment — dealt with a woman KAS officer who wouldn't be shouted down in front of a room full of officers. He raised his voice. She raised her dignity. He reached for the only weapon a bully in office has: her job. This is a grown man with a Secretary's chair threatening a woman's career because she asked to be allowed to finish a sentence. She was composed. She was clear. She didn't flinch. That is what dignity and self respect looks like. He is what a problem looks like. This is what abrogation of Art 370 has brought upon us. An assault on dignity at every level. Even the officers in administration behave like conquerors. Office of LG J&K Atal Dulloo — if she is touched for holding her dignity, it will have consequences.

Office of Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi

34,881 views • 21 hours ago

Democrats are importing immigrants for votes. This must stop otherwise America will become a one party state. “The numbers have basically increased—and this is from a government website, by the way, which is run by Democrats. In some cases, you’re seeing increases of like 700% over the past three and a half years, especially in swing states. What a coincidence. When you’re talking about elections that are won or lost by 10,000 or 20,000 votes, and then you bring in 200,000 people and put them on a fast track to citizenship, that has a huge impact. This is without even considering any cheating—this is legalized. If this continues over the next four years, there won’t be any swing states. They’re importing voters. I think that’s obvious to anyone who looks at it. We’ll end up in a situation like California, which is essentially a one-party state. California has a supermajority Democratic government, so it’s one-party rule. And if you have one-party rule, that’s not a democracy. So I think action has to be taken now.” Elon Musk

Democrats are importing immigrants for votes. This must stop otherwise America will become a one party state. “The numbers have basically increased—and this is from a government website, by the way, which is run by Democrats. In some cases, you’re seeing increases of like 700% over the past three and a half years, especially in swing states. What a coincidence. When you’re talking about elections that are won or lost by 10,000 or 20,000 votes, and then you bring in 200,000 people and put them on a fast track to citizenship, that has a huge impact. This is without even considering any cheating—this is legalized. If this continues over the next four years, there won’t be any swing states. They’re importing voters. I think that’s obvious to anyone who looks at it. We’ll end up in a situation like California, which is essentially a one-party state. California has a supermajority Democratic government, so it’s one-party rule. And if you have one-party rule, that’s not a democracy. So I think action has to be taken now.” Elon Musk

Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

16,146 views • 9 months ago

I am shocked after watching this video. How can a male police officer grab female from behind and take her away like this? This is how a woman protesting for the safety of girls is being treated. No police officer should handle a woman in this manner. Where were the female police officers? Mumtaz Patel ji must file an FIR against this person for his conduct.

I am shocked after watching this video. How can a male police officer grab female from behind and take her away like this? This is how a woman protesting for the safety of girls is being treated. No police officer should handle a woman in this manner. Where were the female police officers? Mumtaz Patel ji must file an FIR against this person for his conduct.

Dr. Kanchana Yadav

15,362 views • 17 days ago

OPEN LETTER TO THE NIGERIAN POLICE FORCE Dear Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU, I am posting this video because the man in it is an officer of the Nigerian Police Force, and his remarks about Igbos and Peter Obi are deeply troubling. As an Igbo man, how am I expected to trust the Nigerian Police when one of its officers publicly profiles Igbos as ritualists and Yahoo boys? The Nigerian Police Force is a federal institution established to protect every Nigerian, regardless of tribe, ethnicity or political affiliation. An officer who publicly makes such disparaging and discriminatory remarks about a section of Nigerians has demonstrated conduct that is completely incompatible with the responsibility and dignity of the office he occupies. There is video evidence of his conduct. I am therefore calling on Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU to immediately identify this officer and dismiss him from the Nigerian Police Force with immediate effect. Anything less sends a dangerous message. If an officer can publicly make these statements about Igbos, remain in the Nigerian Police Force and face no serious disciplinary consequence, then the Nigerian public is entitled to question whether the position he expressed is tolerated by, or reflects the position of, the institution he represents. The Police Force must not allow silence or inaction to create that impression. This is about public trust. This is about the dignity of Nigerians. This is about whether an Igbo Nigerian can look at an officer of the Nigerian Police Force and believe that he will be treated fairly and without ethnic prejudice. Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU, identify him, dismiss him and make it clear that this is not the position of the Nigerian Police Force.

OPEN LETTER TO THE NIGERIAN POLICE FORCE Dear Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU, I am posting this video because the man in it is an officer of the Nigerian Police Force, and his remarks about Igbos and Peter Obi are deeply troubling. As an Igbo man, how am I expected to trust the Nigerian Police when one of its officers publicly profiles Igbos as ritualists and Yahoo boys? The Nigerian Police Force is a federal institution established to protect every Nigerian, regardless of tribe, ethnicity or political affiliation. An officer who publicly makes such disparaging and discriminatory remarks about a section of Nigerians has demonstrated conduct that is completely incompatible with the responsibility and dignity of the office he occupies. There is video evidence of his conduct. I am therefore calling on Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU to immediately identify this officer and dismiss him from the Nigerian Police Force with immediate effect. Anything less sends a dangerous message. If an officer can publicly make these statements about Igbos, remain in the Nigerian Police Force and face no serious disciplinary consequence, then the Nigerian public is entitled to question whether the position he expressed is tolerated by, or reflects the position of, the institution he represents. The Police Force must not allow silence or inaction to create that impression. This is about public trust. This is about the dignity of Nigerians. This is about whether an Igbo Nigerian can look at an officer of the Nigerian Police Force and believe that he will be treated fairly and without ethnic prejudice. Nigeria Police Force and Nigeria Police Force_CRU, identify him, dismiss him and make it clear that this is not the position of the Nigerian Police Force.

𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑮𝑬𝑵𝑬𝑹𝑨𝑳 𝑺𝑵𝑶𝑾 🇨🇮

40,064 views • 23 days ago

#WATCH | Bhubaneswar, Odisha: BJD leader Lekha Samantsinghar says, "The purchase of 51 Mahindra Thar Jeeps in Odisha at an exorbitant rate and paying crores of money for their remodification smacks of a deep conspiracy and corrupt practice by the Odisha government. It is not clear at all who ordered the purchase of the vehicles, who ordered the modification of the vehicles, or for what purpose they are going to be used... This shows that the Odisha BJP government is just finding new and innovative ways to make money, to make their ministers richer, and they are involved in scams in every department... Just because the BJP government is in power doesn't mean that they will create new schemes and new scams and siphon away all the money, which we can never accept... The departmental minister should issue a statement as to who is behind this very convoluted and thoughtless program and scheme... Everything must be clear to the people of Odisha."

#WATCH | Bhubaneswar, Odisha: BJD leader Lekha Samantsinghar says, "The purchase of 51 Mahindra Thar Jeeps in Odisha at an exorbitant rate and paying crores of money for their remodification smacks of a deep conspiracy and corrupt practice by the Odisha government. It is not clear at all who ordered the purchase of the vehicles, who ordered the modification of the vehicles, or for what purpose they are going to be used... This shows that the Odisha BJP government is just finding new and innovative ways to make money, to make their ministers richer, and they are involved in scams in every department... Just because the BJP government is in power doesn't mean that they will create new schemes and new scams and siphon away all the money, which we can never accept... The departmental minister should issue a statement as to who is behind this very convoluted and thoughtless program and scheme... Everything must be clear to the people of Odisha."

ANI

15,707 views • 9 months ago

This is the same Odisha where the BJP government has completed 100 days in power. Narendra Modi spoke about women's empowerment and safety in Odisha on the 17th, but just a few hours later, this incident occurred. In Odisha, a woman closed her restaurant and went out at night, after which some boys harassed her. She and her fiancé, who is an army officer, went to the police station to file a complaint. She stated that she was tied up in the police station. After some time, a police officer came in, removed her undergarments, and kicked her in the chest. Under the BJP government, predators are not only on the streets but also within the police force. Women are not safe even in police stations. The Prime Minister remains silent, as do all BJP representatives in ruling states like Badlapur in UP, Odisha, and Bihar. He is busy campaigning and doesn’t have time to address women's safety issues. No female BJP MP is willing to speak out on this matter. The BJP rightfully protested in West Bengal, but what about other states where they are in power? Who can justify this? Where are women safe? : Supriya Shrinate Ji

This is the same Odisha where the BJP government has completed 100 days in power. Narendra Modi spoke about women's empowerment and safety in Odisha on the 17th, but just a few hours later, this incident occurred. In Odisha, a woman closed her restaurant and went out at night, after which some boys harassed her. She and her fiancé, who is an army officer, went to the police station to file a complaint. She stated that she was tied up in the police station. After some time, a police officer came in, removed her undergarments, and kicked her in the chest. Under the BJP government, predators are not only on the streets but also within the police force. Women are not safe even in police stations. The Prime Minister remains silent, as do all BJP representatives in ruling states like Badlapur in UP, Odisha, and Bihar. He is busy campaigning and doesn’t have time to address women's safety issues. No female BJP MP is willing to speak out on this matter. The BJP rightfully protested in West Bengal, but what about other states where they are in power? Who can justify this? Where are women safe? : Supriya Shrinate Ji

Congress

33,918 views • 2 years ago

This video of the government-owned boat that sank in Lake Kariba, killing tens of people, is a reflection of Zimbabwe’s public infrastructure, which has been destroyed by incompetence, nepotism and, more importantly, corruption. The video shows how the boat was allowed to pack passengers like sardines, how those left on land talked about how the idea of the journey was a bad idea and how the end started to unfold. This is a 43-year-old boat owned by a government agency. It is battered and clearly in a terrible state. Nowhere in a functional country would a boat in this condition be allowed to carry passengers, let alone 153 people when it was supposed to carry a maximum of 45. This is negligence of the highest order. The government has sent these people to their deaths, and it must take full responsibility. Again, in a normal country, and I hope that in this respect Zimbabwe can be a normal country, there would be lawyers willing to take up pro bono cases against the government on behalf of the families of those who died. When you have a government agency operating such a battered boat, no government authority stopping it from being used, and apparently no effective system ensuring that basic passenger and safety limits are respected, then the state has catastrophically failed to discharge its duty to protect citizens. This avoidable accident has now been declared a national disaster, but declaring it a national disaster does not bring these people back. It does not answer the fundamental questions about how this was allowed to happen. Who inspected this boat? Who certified it as safe to carry passengers? Who was responsible for enforcing its maximum passenger capacity? How could a boat meant to carry no more than 45 people end up carrying 153 without being stopped by anyone? Who knew about its condition, and what did they do about it? This tragedy must be used not only to hold those responsible accountable, but also to make sure that something like this never happens again. There must be an independent investigation, and its findings must be made public. Those whose negligence contributed to these deaths must face consequences, regardless of their positions or political connections. In a normal country, the Minister of Transport should have resigned before the end of today. Let us not forget that RIDA falls under the President’s office, while the Transport ministry has responsibility for the regulatory framework governing the transportation of people and public safety. But we all know that in Zimbabwe, ministers are too often not appointed on account of their competence. They are appointed on account of political loyalty and how much they are willing to bootlick the President. When competence, accountability and professionalism are replaced by patronage, this is the result you end up with. Disaster! These were human beings whose families expected them to come home. Declaring a national disaster and issuing condolences are not enough. There must be accountability, there must be justice for the victims and their families, and there must be fundamental changes to ensure that Zimbabweans are never again sent to their deaths because those entrusted with protecting them failed to do their jobs. The fact that nobody has resigned simply shows how Zimbabwe is not a Banana Republic.

This video of the government-owned boat that sank in Lake Kariba, killing tens of people, is a reflection of Zimbabwe’s public infrastructure, which has been destroyed by incompetence, nepotism and, more importantly, corruption. The video shows how the boat was allowed to pack passengers like sardines, how those left on land talked about how the idea of the journey was a bad idea and how the end started to unfold. This is a 43-year-old boat owned by a government agency. It is battered and clearly in a terrible state. Nowhere in a functional country would a boat in this condition be allowed to carry passengers, let alone 153 people when it was supposed to carry a maximum of 45. This is negligence of the highest order. The government has sent these people to their deaths, and it must take full responsibility. Again, in a normal country, and I hope that in this respect Zimbabwe can be a normal country, there would be lawyers willing to take up pro bono cases against the government on behalf of the families of those who died. When you have a government agency operating such a battered boat, no government authority stopping it from being used, and apparently no effective system ensuring that basic passenger and safety limits are respected, then the state has catastrophically failed to discharge its duty to protect citizens. This avoidable accident has now been declared a national disaster, but declaring it a national disaster does not bring these people back. It does not answer the fundamental questions about how this was allowed to happen. Who inspected this boat? Who certified it as safe to carry passengers? Who was responsible for enforcing its maximum passenger capacity? How could a boat meant to carry no more than 45 people end up carrying 153 without being stopped by anyone? Who knew about its condition, and what did they do about it? This tragedy must be used not only to hold those responsible accountable, but also to make sure that something like this never happens again. There must be an independent investigation, and its findings must be made public. Those whose negligence contributed to these deaths must face consequences, regardless of their positions or political connections. In a normal country, the Minister of Transport should have resigned before the end of today. Let us not forget that RIDA falls under the President’s office, while the Transport ministry has responsibility for the regulatory framework governing the transportation of people and public safety. But we all know that in Zimbabwe, ministers are too often not appointed on account of their competence. They are appointed on account of political loyalty and how much they are willing to bootlick the President. When competence, accountability and professionalism are replaced by patronage, this is the result you end up with. Disaster! These were human beings whose families expected them to come home. Declaring a national disaster and issuing condolences are not enough. There must be accountability, there must be justice for the victims and their families, and there must be fundamental changes to ensure that Zimbabweans are never again sent to their deaths because those entrusted with protecting them failed to do their jobs. The fact that nobody has resigned simply shows how Zimbabwe is not a Banana Republic.

Hopewell Chin’ono

32,536 views • 2 months ago

THE GURDWARA IS NOT YOUR POLITICAL SHIELD! When Politics Enters the House of the Guru, Every Sikh Has a Right to Ask Questions. By Major Samar Pal Singh Toor Infantry Combat Veteran | Sikh As a Sikh, I find any alleged misuse of a Gurdwara for political confrontation deeply troubling. A Gurdwara is not a political safe house, a staging ground for street confrontations, or a convenient refuge from law enforcement. It is the Darbar of the Guru a place of prayer, humility, service, and spiritual discipline. The sanctity of our religious institutions cannot become collateral damage in somebody else's political battle. If reports that CJP protesters with some uncovered heads entered or used a Gurdwara to evade the police are accurate, serious questions must be answered. Who authorised their presence? Were the management and congregation consulted? Was the religious space used to advance a political objective? And were the traditions and dignity of the institution respected? These are legitimate questions. They deserve answers, not political deflection. 1984: A Wound That Must Never Be Exploited Again The events of 1984 remain a profound wound in Sikh history. The desecration of the Golden Temple complex during Operation Blue Star, followed by the anti-Sikh violence after the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, left scars across generations. For Sikhs, these are not abstract historical references. They are reminders of what happens when political power, religious sensitivities, and violence collide. Our history should have taught every political organisation a fundamental lesson: religious institutions must never become instruments in a political struggle. No party, protest movement, political front, or pressure group has the right to treat a Gurdwara as its personal political property. And no political cause, however passionately its supporters believe in it, automatically grants permission to compromise the dignity of a sacred place. THE GURDWARA IS THE HOUSE OF THE GURU—NOT A REFUGE FROM ACCOUNTABILITY Let us be absolutely clear. A Gurdwara welcomes people regardless of their political beliefs. Its doors are not supposed to be opened or closed according to party affiliation, ideology, or personal allegiance. But the principle of welcome must not be deliberately exploited. There is a fundamental difference between seeking shelter in a place of worship during genuine danger and deliberately using a religious institution to evade lawful police action while pursuing a political confrontation. The circumstances matter. The evidence matters. The intentions and actions of those involved matter. If protesters knowingly used the sanctity of a Gurdwara as a shield against law enforcement, that conduct deserves unequivocal scrutiny and condemnation. The Guru's Darbar must never be reduced to a tactical advantage in a street confrontation. The law must operate fairly, religious institutions must be respected, and any allegations of misconduct must be established through evidence rather than political accusations. HEAD COVERING AND RESPECT: TRADITION MUST NOT BECOME A POLITICAL WEAPON Questions have also been raised about protesters allegedly entering the Gurdwara with their heads uncovered. In Sikh tradition, covering one's head inside a Gurdwara is an important expression of respect. Visitors are ordinarily expected to observe this practice, and the management has a responsibility to uphold the institution's established norms. However, the issue must be addressed with consistency and dignity. An uncovered head may indicate a failure to observe religious etiquette, but it does not, by itself, establish political provocation or malicious intent. The larger question is whether visitors respected the Gurdwara, its congregation, its management, and its religious discipline—or whether the institution was drawn into a political confrontation. Respect for the Guru cannot be reduced to a photograph, a slogan, or a political argument. It must be reflected in conduct. MY QUESTION TO THE PROTESTERS AND THEIR LEADERSHIP If this was a political protest, why did a place of worship become part of the confrontation? If the protesters required protection, what were the circumstances? If the Gurdwara was used to evade police action, who made that decision, and on what grounds? And if the management did not consent to its premises being used for political purposes, who will take responsibility for the resulting controversy? These questions must be answered transparently. The management of a Gurdwara deserves the freedom to administer its religious premises without being pressured by political organisations. The congregation deserves to worship without being involuntarily drawn into political disputes. And the public deserves a factual account of what happened. No organisation should receive immunity from scrutiny merely because its members invoke political rights or claim to represent a cause. Equally, no individual should be condemned without evidence. That is the standard of accountability a democratic society must uphold. A MESSAGE TO EVERY POLITICAL ORGANISATION Whether it is the Congress, the CJP, or any other political organisation, the principle remains the same. The Gurdwara is not your campaign office. The Darbar of the Guru is not your protest headquarters. The Sikh faith is not your political shield. Our religious institutions have endured enough historical trauma to deserve protection from avoidable political confrontation. Do not invoke Sikh suffering when it suits your argument and disregard Sikh religious traditions when they inconvenience your political strategy. Do not claim to respect the community while treating its sacred spaces as instruments in a political contest. And do not expect religious reverence to silence legitimate questions about your conduct. The Sikh tradition of Seva, Sangat, and Pangat teaches humility, equality, and responsibility. It does not grant any political organisation ownership over the faith. MY FINAL WORD AS A SIKH AND AN INFANTRY COMBAT VETERAN I have profound respect for the freedom of citizens to protest peacefully, question authority, and demand accountability. But rights come with responsibilities. Political activism must respect religious freedom. Law enforcement must act lawfully. Religious managements must protect the sanctity of their institutions. And protesters must not assume that a sacred place can be converted into a political instrument without consequences. The lessons of 1984 should make us more vigilant about protecting religious institutions from political exploitation—not more willing to excuse it when the political actors happen to support our preferred cause. I will defend the right of every citizen to peaceful protest. I will equally defend the right of every Sikh congregation to preserve the dignity and sanctity of its Gurdwara. Our Guru's Darbar is sacred. Political ambitions are temporary. No political movement stands above the dignity of the Guru's house. Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh. — Major Samar Pal Singh Toor Infantry Combat Veteran

THE GURDWARA IS NOT YOUR POLITICAL SHIELD! When Politics Enters the House of the Guru, Every Sikh Has a Right to Ask Questions. By Major Samar Pal Singh Toor Infantry Combat Veteran | Sikh As a Sikh, I find any alleged misuse of a Gurdwara for political confrontation deeply troubling. A Gurdwara is not a political safe house, a staging ground for street confrontations, or a convenient refuge from law enforcement. It is the Darbar of the Guru a place of prayer, humility, service, and spiritual discipline. The sanctity of our religious institutions cannot become collateral damage in somebody else's political battle. If reports that CJP protesters with some uncovered heads entered or used a Gurdwara to evade the police are accurate, serious questions must be answered. Who authorised their presence? Were the management and congregation consulted? Was the religious space used to advance a political objective? And were the traditions and dignity of the institution respected? These are legitimate questions. They deserve answers, not political deflection. 1984: A Wound That Must Never Be Exploited Again The events of 1984 remain a profound wound in Sikh history. The desecration of the Golden Temple complex during Operation Blue Star, followed by the anti-Sikh violence after the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, left scars across generations. For Sikhs, these are not abstract historical references. They are reminders of what happens when political power, religious sensitivities, and violence collide. Our history should have taught every political organisation a fundamental lesson: religious institutions must never become instruments in a political struggle. No party, protest movement, political front, or pressure group has the right to treat a Gurdwara as its personal political property. And no political cause, however passionately its supporters believe in it, automatically grants permission to compromise the dignity of a sacred place. THE GURDWARA IS THE HOUSE OF THE GURU—NOT A REFUGE FROM ACCOUNTABILITY Let us be absolutely clear. A Gurdwara welcomes people regardless of their political beliefs. Its doors are not supposed to be opened or closed according to party affiliation, ideology, or personal allegiance. But the principle of welcome must not be deliberately exploited. There is a fundamental difference between seeking shelter in a place of worship during genuine danger and deliberately using a religious institution to evade lawful police action while pursuing a political confrontation. The circumstances matter. The evidence matters. The intentions and actions of those involved matter. If protesters knowingly used the sanctity of a Gurdwara as a shield against law enforcement, that conduct deserves unequivocal scrutiny and condemnation. The Guru's Darbar must never be reduced to a tactical advantage in a street confrontation. The law must operate fairly, religious institutions must be respected, and any allegations of misconduct must be established through evidence rather than political accusations. HEAD COVERING AND RESPECT: TRADITION MUST NOT BECOME A POLITICAL WEAPON Questions have also been raised about protesters allegedly entering the Gurdwara with their heads uncovered. In Sikh tradition, covering one's head inside a Gurdwara is an important expression of respect. Visitors are ordinarily expected to observe this practice, and the management has a responsibility to uphold the institution's established norms. However, the issue must be addressed with consistency and dignity. An uncovered head may indicate a failure to observe religious etiquette, but it does not, by itself, establish political provocation or malicious intent. The larger question is whether visitors respected the Gurdwara, its congregation, its management, and its religious discipline—or whether the institution was drawn into a political confrontation. Respect for the Guru cannot be reduced to a photograph, a slogan, or a political argument. It must be reflected in conduct. MY QUESTION TO THE PROTESTERS AND THEIR LEADERSHIP If this was a political protest, why did a place of worship become part of the confrontation? If the protesters required protection, what were the circumstances? If the Gurdwara was used to evade police action, who made that decision, and on what grounds? And if the management did not consent to its premises being used for political purposes, who will take responsibility for the resulting controversy? These questions must be answered transparently. The management of a Gurdwara deserves the freedom to administer its religious premises without being pressured by political organisations. The congregation deserves to worship without being involuntarily drawn into political disputes. And the public deserves a factual account of what happened. No organisation should receive immunity from scrutiny merely because its members invoke political rights or claim to represent a cause. Equally, no individual should be condemned without evidence. That is the standard of accountability a democratic society must uphold. A MESSAGE TO EVERY POLITICAL ORGANISATION Whether it is the Congress, the CJP, or any other political organisation, the principle remains the same. The Gurdwara is not your campaign office. The Darbar of the Guru is not your protest headquarters. The Sikh faith is not your political shield. Our religious institutions have endured enough historical trauma to deserve protection from avoidable political confrontation. Do not invoke Sikh suffering when it suits your argument and disregard Sikh religious traditions when they inconvenience your political strategy. Do not claim to respect the community while treating its sacred spaces as instruments in a political contest. And do not expect religious reverence to silence legitimate questions about your conduct. The Sikh tradition of Seva, Sangat, and Pangat teaches humility, equality, and responsibility. It does not grant any political organisation ownership over the faith. MY FINAL WORD AS A SIKH AND AN INFANTRY COMBAT VETERAN I have profound respect for the freedom of citizens to protest peacefully, question authority, and demand accountability. But rights come with responsibilities. Political activism must respect religious freedom. Law enforcement must act lawfully. Religious managements must protect the sanctity of their institutions. And protesters must not assume that a sacred place can be converted into a political instrument without consequences. The lessons of 1984 should make us more vigilant about protecting religious institutions from political exploitation—not more willing to excuse it when the political actors happen to support our preferred cause. I will defend the right of every citizen to peaceful protest. I will equally defend the right of every Sikh congregation to preserve the dignity and sanctity of its Gurdwara. Our Guru's Darbar is sacred. Political ambitions are temporary. No political movement stands above the dignity of the Guru's house. Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh. — Major Samar Pal Singh Toor Infantry Combat Veteran

MajorSammerToor

13,862 views • 5 days ago

BITCOIN HISTORY WAS JUST MADE IN FLORIDA We are now the FIRST STATE to Pass a Stablecoin framework in the nation! It has now passed the Senate and the House, and will be signed by DeSantis within the next 30 days! How was this able to happen? Well, because we are literally the best State in the Union, that is how. Florida has been the leader in the Bitcoin world, and we will continue to be a leader to ensure we are the Bitcoin Capitol of the United States and the World. Thank you to everyone who has been a part of this process, from the small group of power players like Zach Witkoff and Jason Holloway to those within Florida's government who have made this such a successful Legislative Session.

BITCOIN HISTORY WAS JUST MADE IN FLORIDA We are now the FIRST STATE to Pass a Stablecoin framework in the nation! It has now passed the Senate and the House, and will be signed by DeSantis within the next 30 days! How was this able to happen? Well, because we are literally the best State in the Union, that is how. Florida has been the leader in the Bitcoin world, and we will continue to be a leader to ensure we are the Bitcoin Capitol of the United States and the World. Thank you to everyone who has been a part of this process, from the small group of power players like Zach Witkoff and Jason Holloway to those within Florida's government who have made this such a successful Legislative Session.

Samuel Armes

147,901 views • 7 months ago