Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

KAY: There is no commitment in this MOU for Iran not becoming a nuclear state in the future REP. MIKE TURNER: It actually expressly states that -- 'the Islamic Republic confirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons' KAY: Which was the first sentence of the JCPOA,...

atrupar's profile picture

Aaron Rupar

1,111,671 subscribers

336,373 просмотров • 18 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

“Iran reaffirms that it will not procure or develop nuclear weapons.”
0:32

“Iran reaffirms that it will not procure or develop nuclear weapons.”

Dr. Eli David

517,436 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Donald Trump on the Iran deal: 'It's signed.' The document as released contains 14 points of understanding between the U.S. and Iran, including one which states Tehran "reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons."
1:14

Donald Trump on the Iran deal: 'It's signed.' The document as released contains 14 points of understanding between the U.S. and Iran, including one which states Tehran "reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons."

Sky News

20,935 просмотров • 20 дней назад

JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇮🇷 Russia's Foreign Minister Lavrov says not just Iran but now many countries will start to develop nuclear weapons: This war that they have now unleashed against Iran, it, firstly, can stimulate movement in favor of creating nuclear weapons, and not only in Iran. Such a movement will immediately appear in the countries—Arab countries that neighbor the Islamic Republic of Iran. Therefore, paradoxically, an announced noble goal to start a war so that there is no proliferation of nuclear weapons can stimulate completely opposite trends."
1:04

JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇮🇷 Russia's Foreign Minister Lavrov says not just Iran but now many countries will start to develop nuclear weapons: This war that they have now unleashed against Iran, it, firstly, can stimulate movement in favor of creating nuclear weapons, and not only in Iran. Such a movement will immediately appear in the countries—Arab countries that neighbor the Islamic Republic of Iran. Therefore, paradoxically, an announced noble goal to start a war so that there is no proliferation of nuclear weapons can stimulate completely opposite trends."

Megatron

599,371 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The Russian government has concluded there was no evidence or proof that Iran was building nuclear weapons. "There is information from the IAEA and American intelligence that Iran did not manufacture nuclear weapons and did not have any plans to."
0:34

The Russian government has concluded there was no evidence or proof that Iran was building nuclear weapons. "There is information from the IAEA and American intelligence that Iran did not manufacture nuclear weapons and did not have any plans to."

Shadow of Ezra

64,029 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

As Secretary of State in the first Trump administration, I agreed with the president that the JCPOA would have put Iran on a glide path to nuclear weapons. He was clear then that a nuclear Iran was unacceptable - and he's made that more than clear now.
0:38

As Secretary of State in the first Trump administration, I agreed with the president that the JCPOA would have put Iran on a glide path to nuclear weapons. He was clear then that a nuclear Iran was unacceptable - and he's made that more than clear now.

Mike Pompeo

102,680 просмотров • 1 год назад

How is it Trump's nominee for the IAEA, a key nuclear inspection agency, didn't know that both the IAEA AND Trump's 1st Admin certified that Iran was in compliance with the JCPOA? The JCPOA was preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Trump ripped it up & started a war.
1:28

How is it Trump's nominee for the IAEA, a key nuclear inspection agency, didn't know that both the IAEA AND Trump's 1st Admin certified that Iran was in compliance with the JCPOA? The JCPOA was preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Trump ripped it up & started a war.

Senator Chris Van Hollen

44,426 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The head of the U.N.'s nuclear agency signaled Wednesday that Iranian nuclear enrichment sites would be visited by his inspectors, a key component in the interim deal between the United States and Iran to reach an end to the war. He added that the timing of the inspections is "not essential," but that it will happen.
1:32

The head of the U.N.'s nuclear agency signaled Wednesday that Iranian nuclear enrichment sites would be visited by his inspectors, a key component in the interim deal between the United States and Iran to reach an end to the war. He added that the timing of the inspections is "not essential," but that it will happen.

CBS News

23,651 просмотров • 13 дней назад

🚨Former US State Department Senior Advisor for Iran: Israel wants to reduce Iran to a NON-FUNCTIONING state! ‘There is definitely a feeling that for Israel, unlike the United States, Iran is an existential threat, or perceives Iran to be an existential threat. And whereas President Trump could well be satisfied with a good deal on the nuclear issue, Israel seems to be dedicated to the proposition that the Islamic Republic, in and of itself, is unacceptable for Israel. So limitations on nuclear would not be enough. Limitations on missile and proxies would not be enough. They feel that as long as Iran, the Islamic Republic of Iran, is a functioning state that can project power, Israel is under threat. I think Israel, Israel’s goal, or at least a part of the Cabinet, is to so weaken this regime that it’s unable to project any type of power that could threaten Israel.’ -The State Department’s First Persian-Language Spokesperson Alan Eyre Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇
1:20

🚨Former US State Department Senior Advisor for Iran: Israel wants to reduce Iran to a NON-FUNCTIONING state! ‘There is definitely a feeling that for Israel, unlike the United States, Iran is an existential threat, or perceives Iran to be an existential threat. And whereas President Trump could well be satisfied with a good deal on the nuclear issue, Israel seems to be dedicated to the proposition that the Islamic Republic, in and of itself, is unacceptable for Israel. So limitations on nuclear would not be enough. Limitations on missile and proxies would not be enough. They feel that as long as Iran, the Islamic Republic of Iran, is a functioning state that can project power, Israel is under threat. I think Israel, Israel’s goal, or at least a part of the Cabinet, is to so weaken this regime that it’s unable to project any type of power that could threaten Israel.’ -The State Department’s First Persian-Language Spokesperson Alan Eyre Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

20,713 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 UPDATE: President Trump reveals Iran has AGREED to NEVER obtain a nuclear weapon in any form "They've conceded the fact that they will not have nuclear weapons. We had a clause in there that we will not develop nuclear weapons and everybody was very happy with it except me. And I said, well, what happens if they not develop, but they go out and purchase, they acquire!" "I want to put the word, if they buy or purchase or acquire, you've got to have that in there too because that's not developing."
2:03

🚨 UPDATE: President Trump reveals Iran has AGREED to NEVER obtain a nuclear weapon in any form "They've conceded the fact that they will not have nuclear weapons. We had a clause in there that we will not develop nuclear weapons and everybody was very happy with it except me. And I said, well, what happens if they not develop, but they go out and purchase, they acquire!" "I want to put the word, if they buy or purchase or acquire, you've got to have that in there too because that's not developing."

Eric Daugherty

185,710 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

When asked how he’s justifying the war in Iran to his constituents in Dayton, Ohio, Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) says “no one is willing to trade lower gas prices for Iran becoming a nuclear state.” “When Vice President Vance stood at the podium and said that the negotiations had broken off because Iran was not willing to declare that they would not become a nuclear state, that should have sent a chill both through Europe and around the world,” he tells Margaret Brennan.
2:56

When asked how he’s justifying the war in Iran to his constituents in Dayton, Ohio, Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) says “no one is willing to trade lower gas prices for Iran becoming a nuclear state.” “When Vice President Vance stood at the podium and said that the negotiations had broken off because Iran was not willing to declare that they would not become a nuclear state, that should have sent a chill both through Europe and around the world,” he tells Margaret Brennan.

Face The Nation

47,676 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Obama: There was a deal in place in which Iran had agreed not to develop nuclear weapons. This administration pulled out of it, which caused then Iran to develop more nuclear capacity ... it feels like we're back where we were before we started the war, except maybe a little bit worse off.
0:49

Obama: There was a deal in place in which Iran had agreed not to develop nuclear weapons. This administration pulled out of it, which caused then Iran to develop more nuclear capacity ... it feels like we're back where we were before we started the war, except maybe a little bit worse off.

Scott Robertson

55,443 просмотров • 18 дней назад

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 The side that broke the ceasefire agreement was not Iran. Fmr. CIA Analyst Larry Johnson explains it. "It was the United States, not Iran, that launched it. Since the MoU was signed that launched the first attack against Iran." The West is rewriting who the aggressor actually is. SonofNewAmericanRevolution
1:48

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 The side that broke the ceasefire agreement was not Iran. Fmr. CIA Analyst Larry Johnson explains it. "It was the United States, not Iran, that launched it. Since the MoU was signed that launched the first attack against Iran." The West is rewriting who the aggressor actually is. SonofNewAmericanRevolution

Mario Nawfal

64,484 просмотров • 9 дней назад

WOW. US Senator Markwayne Mullin, who serves on the Armed Services Committee, believes that Ayatollah Khamenei, the current Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, has been the Supreme Leader since 1979. He also believes that Ayatollah Khomeini (the founder of the Islamic Republic and the first Supreme Leader) came into power saying he wanted a nuclear Iran. That is false. In fact, he was very skeptical of nuclear ambitions. It wasn’t until years later that the Islamic Republic became interested in pursuing nuclear enrichment.
0:35

WOW. US Senator Markwayne Mullin, who serves on the Armed Services Committee, believes that Ayatollah Khamenei, the current Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, has been the Supreme Leader since 1979. He also believes that Ayatollah Khomeini (the founder of the Islamic Republic and the first Supreme Leader) came into power saying he wanted a nuclear Iran. That is false. In fact, he was very skeptical of nuclear ambitions. It wasn’t until years later that the Islamic Republic became interested in pursuing nuclear enrichment.

Yashar Ali 🐘

445,707 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

A Pahlavist insists the war is "not against Iran, but against the Islamic Republic." Host: "The Karaj bridge was struck today. Was that an attack on Iran or the Islamic Republic? How do you tell the difference?" Soleimanian: "Without fact-checking it's hard to say who struck it." Host: "The President of the United States himself announced that America struck it. You're still not sure?" Soleimanian (in English for whatever reason): "Trump on the spot makes up lies."
0:50

A Pahlavist insists the war is "not against Iran, but against the Islamic Republic." Host: "The Karaj bridge was struck today. Was that an attack on Iran or the Islamic Republic? How do you tell the difference?" Soleimanian: "Without fact-checking it's hard to say who struck it." Host: "The President of the United States himself announced that America struck it. You're still not sure?" Soleimanian (in English for whatever reason): "Trump on the spot makes up lies."

DD Geopolitics

61,058 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

'On the basis of our own evaluations, we came to the conclusion that we could not affirm that there is any systematic effort in Iran to manufacture a nuclear weapon' The nuclear watchdog does not believe Iran was trying to develop a nuclear weapon, its chief tells Yalda Hakim
1:31

'On the basis of our own evaluations, we came to the conclusion that we could not affirm that there is any systematic effort in Iran to manufacture a nuclear weapon' The nuclear watchdog does not believe Iran was trying to develop a nuclear weapon, its chief tells Yalda Hakim

Sky News

587,385 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST NOW: "The main thing is that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon!" "They fully agreed to that with strong POLICING powers and they won't have a nuclear weapon, which is what it was all about because they probably would have used it if they had it." "So we had two big moments when we terminated the JCPOA, that was the Obama deal, the Barack Hussein Obama deal." "And when I terminated, that was very important because it was a road to a nuclear weapon. It was a horrible deal for the United States. It was a deal where billions of dollars was given to Iran."
0:53

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST NOW: "The main thing is that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon!" "They fully agreed to that with strong POLICING powers and they won't have a nuclear weapon, which is what it was all about because they probably would have used it if they had it." "So we had two big moments when we terminated the JCPOA, that was the Obama deal, the Barack Hussein Obama deal." "And when I terminated, that was very important because it was a road to a nuclear weapon. It was a horrible deal for the United States. It was a deal where billions of dollars was given to Iran."

Eric Daugherty

76,485 просмотров • 22 дней назад

"This is a firm commitment backed up by verifiable action to never develop or buy a nuclear weapon by the Iranians... that was the whole point of this entire operation." - Vice President JD Vance JD Vance 🇺🇸
1:42

"This is a firm commitment backed up by verifiable action to never develop or buy a nuclear weapon by the Iranians... that was the whole point of this entire operation." - Vice President JD Vance JD Vance 🇺🇸

The White House

117,229 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Professor John Mearsheimer: Israel may ultimately use nuclear weapons against Iran. It is now clear that Israel cannot prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons using its conventional forces. That option does not work. The only option they have left is nuclear weapons. The United States will not stop it.
1:47

Professor John Mearsheimer: Israel may ultimately use nuclear weapons against Iran. It is now clear that Israel cannot prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons using its conventional forces. That option does not work. The only option they have left is nuclear weapons. The United States will not stop it.

Clash Report

157,846 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Today’s funeral in Tehran for the martyred commanders, nuclear scientists, and their family members. Is this the "unpopular regime" that Zionists, neocons, and the regime in Washington want to overthrow? They will be the ones overthrown, not the Islamic Republic of Iran.
1:29

Today’s funeral in Tehran for the martyred commanders, nuclear scientists, and their family members. Is this the "unpopular regime" that Zionists, neocons, and the regime in Washington want to overthrow? They will be the ones overthrown, not the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Seyed Mohammad Marandi

31,593 просмотров • 1 год назад

Alastair Crooke: The US🇺🇸 may have signalled that it will resume nuclear weapons testing because Trump misunderstood a Russian missile test as a nuclear test ‘It seems to be based on a misunderstanding. Allegedly, Trump has proposed the idea of nuclear tests in response to Russian nuclear tests. But there hasn’t been a Russian nuclear test. The Burevestnik missile, that was publicised these recent days, like the Oreshnik. But this one has a nuclear power. It has got a propulsion system that is nuclear-based. Its warhead isn’t. There isn’t a nuclear warhead on it. It is a conventional warhead, but it is just instead of having a rocket propulsion, it has a nuclear drive that propels it. And this is why it’s able to stay aloft for a very long time, and in fact traverse the whole globe. But it’s nuclear propulsion, not a nuclear weapon. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Now, whether the Russians have been testing underground before, I doubt it…I’m sure they would have taken every opportunity to say it if they thought they had detected Russian or Chinese underground tests.’ -Alastair Crooke, the former Middle East Advisor to the EU Foreign Policy Chief, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇
3:42

Alastair Crooke: The US🇺🇸 may have signalled that it will resume nuclear weapons testing because Trump misunderstood a Russian missile test as a nuclear test ‘It seems to be based on a misunderstanding. Allegedly, Trump has proposed the idea of nuclear tests in response to Russian nuclear tests. But there hasn’t been a Russian nuclear test. The Burevestnik missile, that was publicised these recent days, like the Oreshnik. But this one has a nuclear power. It has got a propulsion system that is nuclear-based. Its warhead isn’t. There isn’t a nuclear warhead on it. It is a conventional warhead, but it is just instead of having a rocket propulsion, it has a nuclear drive that propels it. And this is why it’s able to stay aloft for a very long time, and in fact traverse the whole globe. But it’s nuclear propulsion, not a nuclear weapon. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Now, whether the Russians have been testing underground before, I doubt it…I’m sure they would have taken every opportunity to say it if they thought they had detected Russian or Chinese underground tests.’ -Alastair Crooke, the former Middle East Advisor to the EU Foreign Policy Chief, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

52,238 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад