Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Kibe Mungai: The Constitution does not provide a procedure for removing a Deputy President. The Constitution provides a procedure to remove a President from office.

NTV Kenya

5,351,331 subscribers

51,162 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

“The constitution does not provide for you to cheat the elections…..” When did our neighbor got elected!? When!? President Kagame

“The constitution does not provide for you to cheat the elections…..” When did our neighbor got elected!? When!? President Kagame

African

109,045 views • 8 months ago

$The Constitution Does Not Empower a President To Remove or Suspend a Governor, Even For a Day - Falana What the President is asked to do under Section 305 of the Constitution is to impose a state of emergency and adopt extraordinary measures to restore law and order. Our courts must address this matter; we cannot operate a democratic system of government where the courts fail to make pronouncements on serious infractions of the Constitution. Femi Falana, SAN$

The Constitution Does Not Empower a President To Remove or Suspend a Governor, Even For a Day - Falana What the President is asked to do under Section 305 of the Constitution is to impose a state of emergency and adopt extraordinary measures to restore law and order. Our courts must address this matter; we cannot operate a democratic system of government where the courts fail to make pronouncements on serious infractions of the Constitution. Femi Falana, SAN

ARISE NEWS

70,396 views • 1 year ago

"Members of Congress take oaths of office to the Constitution in the same way that the President does. And if the President's not obeying his oath of office, the Constitution gives them the power, the obligation, and the duty to exercise their constitutional duty and obligation to impeach and remove the criminal president."

"Members of Congress take oaths of office to the Constitution in the same way that the President does. And if the President's not obeying his oath of office, the Constitution gives them the power, the obligation, and the duty to exercise their constitutional duty and obligation to impeach and remove the criminal president."

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

63,421 views • 4 months ago

“We need a new Constitution that does not require us to consult the people,” President Ruto says!

“We need a new Constitution that does not require us to consult the people,” President Ruto says!

The Kenyan Vigilante

20,856 views • 3 days ago

BLANCHE: Who the president chooses to pardon is not a problem, period IVEY: What's the legal basis for that statement? BLANCHE: The Constitution IVEY: The Constitution does not give him the authority to pardon in exchange for payments. It does not permit bribery

BLANCHE: Who the president chooses to pardon is not a problem, period IVEY: What's the legal basis for that statement? BLANCHE: The Constitution IVEY: The Constitution does not give him the authority to pardon in exchange for payments. It does not permit bribery

Aaron Rupar

936,010 views • 2 months ago

BREAKING: Congresswoman Maxine Waters just called for Trump’s cabinet to invoke “Article 25” of the Constitution to remove him from office. “Something's wrong with this president!"

BREAKING: Congresswoman Maxine Waters just called for Trump’s cabinet to invoke “Article 25” of the Constitution to remove him from office. “Something's wrong with this president!"

Brian Krassenstein

659,377 views • 11 months ago

"...the constitution allows the senate to promulgate its own rules of procedure..."

"...the constitution allows the senate to promulgate its own rules of procedure..."

cinecinecine30

17,860 views • 1 year ago

The law is clear and today the judge confirmed: the President is bound by the Constitution. The President cannot—and must not—use the immense power of the executive office to negotiate with an agency for personal benefit. Public office is a public trust, not a personal leverage tool.

The law is clear and today the judge confirmed: the President is bound by the Constitution. The President cannot—and must not—use the immense power of the executive office to negotiate with an agency for personal benefit. Public office is a public trust, not a personal leverage tool.

Debbie Mucarsel-Powell

17,476 views • 1 month ago

VIDEO | Vice-President of India Jagdeep Dhankhar (Vice-President of India) says, "President of India is a very elevated position. President takes oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. This oath is taken only by President and her appointees, the Governors. Everyone, the Prime Minister, the Vice-President, the Ministers, the Parliamentarians, the judges, they take oath to abide by the Constitution. But to defend the Constitution, to preserve the Constitution, to protect the Constitution, that is the oath of the President of India, the supreme commander of the armed forces...There is a directive to the President by a recent judgement. Where are we heading? What is happening in the country? We have to be extremely sensitive. It is not a question of someone filing a review or not. We never bargained for democracy for this day..." (Source: Third Party) (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Vice-President of India Jagdeep Dhankhar (Vice-President of India) says, "President of India is a very elevated position. President takes oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. This oath is taken only by President and her appointees, the Governors. Everyone, the Prime Minister, the Vice-President, the Ministers, the Parliamentarians, the judges, they take oath to abide by the Constitution. But to defend the Constitution, to preserve the Constitution, to protect the Constitution, that is the oath of the President of India, the supreme commander of the armed forces...There is a directive to the President by a recent judgement. Where are we heading? What is happening in the country? We have to be extremely sensitive. It is not a question of someone filing a review or not. We never bargained for democracy for this day..." (Source: Third Party) (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

971,934 views • 1 year ago

To debunk MAGA’s “insurrectionist” theory of the 2nd Amendment, just read the Constitution. Everywhere it rejects insurrection, including in the 14th Amendment which bans insurrectionists from ever holding office again. The Constitution does not provide for its own destruction.

To debunk MAGA’s “insurrectionist” theory of the 2nd Amendment, just read the Constitution. Everywhere it rejects insurrection, including in the 14th Amendment which bans insurrectionists from ever holding office again. The Constitution does not provide for its own destruction.

Rep. Jamie Raskin

558,810 views • 3 years ago

Vice President Harris on Donald Trump: "He does not want a military that is loyal to the United States Constitution, he wants a military that is loyal to him."

Vice President Harris on Donald Trump: "He does not want a military that is loyal to the United States Constitution, he wants a military that is loyal to him."

CSPAN

921,915 views • 1 year ago

"The question of whether or not Congress should impeach and remove the president isn't a question for polling. It's not a question for political consultants. ... This is a battle for the soul of the country, a battle for its democracy, a battle for its constitution and a battle for the rule of law."

"The question of whether or not Congress should impeach and remove the president isn't a question for polling. It's not a question for political consultants. ... This is a battle for the soul of the country, a battle for its democracy, a battle for its constitution and a battle for the rule of law."

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

89,423 views • 2 months ago

Bruce Springsteen performs at a star-studded campaign event for VP Kamala Harris alongside former President Obama. "I want a president who reveres the Constitution, who does not threaten but wants to protect and guide our great democracy," he said.

Bruce Springsteen performs at a star-studded campaign event for VP Kamala Harris alongside former President Obama. "I want a president who reveres the Constitution, who does not threaten but wants to protect and guide our great democracy," he said.

MS NOW

186,846 views • 1 year ago

🔴Changing the constitution to remove or extend terms of office for the President is not in the national interest or good for the country as it only serves the interests of President Emmerson Mnangagwa and those around him, says Lovemore Madhuku, a professor of law. Zanu PF itself is divided over this issue, but they just make noise at their conference and the loudest noise becomes what they then call a resolution to amend the national constitution, he says.

🔴Changing the constitution to remove or extend terms of office for the President is not in the national interest or good for the country as it only serves the interests of President Emmerson Mnangagwa and those around him, says Lovemore Madhuku, a professor of law. Zanu PF itself is divided over this issue, but they just make noise at their conference and the loudest noise becomes what they then call a resolution to amend the national constitution, he says.

TheNewsHawks

43,546 views • 9 months ago

Mr. Samuel Adkisson, Associate Counsel to the President, White House Counsel's Office, on presidential accountability over the executive branch: “To the extent federal agencies exercise significant executive power, that agency must be accountable to the president. Article II of the Constitution vests the executive power in a president of the United States of America, period. The Constitution also provides that the president shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. But if the president can't effectively supervise his subordinates in the executive branch — if, in other words, he is not in charge — it becomes practically impossible for the president to fulfill his duties under Article II of the Constitution. It also begs the question: who would be in charge? It's not the courts. It's not Congress. It's certainly not the people.”

Mr. Samuel Adkisson, Associate Counsel to the President, White House Counsel's Office, on presidential accountability over the executive branch: “To the extent federal agencies exercise significant executive power, that agency must be accountable to the president. Article II of the Constitution vests the executive power in a president of the United States of America, period. The Constitution also provides that the president shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. But if the president can't effectively supervise his subordinates in the executive branch — if, in other words, he is not in charge — it becomes practically impossible for the president to fulfill his duties under Article II of the Constitution. It also begs the question: who would be in charge? It's not the courts. It's not Congress. It's certainly not the people.”

Federalist Society

24,723 views • 2 months ago

Why does MAGA always seem to think that the Constitution shouldn't apply to Trump? 22nd Amendment: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once." If you are a Trump supporter, would you want him to have a 3rd term?

Why does MAGA always seem to think that the Constitution shouldn't apply to Trump? 22nd Amendment: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once." If you are a Trump supporter, would you want him to have a 3rd term?

Ed Krassenstein

173,798 views • 1 year ago

Njeri Maina: The decision by the President to remove vetting is a welcomed decision in regard to Article 27 of the Constitution. The timing for me is really suspect, why did the President have to wait two and a half years to make that declaration? #CitizenDayBreak Sam Gituku

Njeri Maina: The decision by the President to remove vetting is a welcomed decision in regard to Article 27 of the Constitution. The timing for me is really suspect, why did the President have to wait two and a half years to make that declaration? #CitizenDayBreak Sam Gituku

Citizen TV Kenya

56,700 views • 1 year ago