Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Kids math data should be private. All those rocket ships and ice cream cones where they are in these competitive fluency races against each other does not motivate the ones who need it the most! Individual data binders where kids track their own data is what works!

49,086 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Debra Kowalkowski profil fotoğrafı
Debra Kowalkowski3 yıl önce

Thank you for boldly calling out this inequitable math practice that is widely used and is harmful to all learners! We must be well informed as well as well-intentioned (thinking that public posting of progress is motivation).

Principal Cabana profil fotoğrafı
Principal Cabana3 yıl önce

I could not agree more !

Parvathi Sivaraman PhD. profil fotoğrafı
Parvathi Sivaraman PhD.3 yıl önce

@Mathgarden Love this! Thank you reiterating this. Planning to have a year long tracker this year so kids can see their progress even if they are "behind" grade level.

J McMahon profil fotoğrafı
J McMahon3 yıl önce

Amen! I once asked coworkers who had math data on display, “Would you want your teacher evaluation on display for everyone to see?”

Tracie Anthony profil fotoğrafı
Tracie Anthony3 yıl önce

Yes! Yes! Yes!

Sneakin’🎶🎶Sally profil fotoğrafı
Sneakin’🎶🎶Sally3 yıl önce

@pearse_margie Yep. That’s how I do it in 4th.

Somer Drost profil fotoğrafı
Somer Drost3 yıl önce

Yes!!!

LeQuisha Underwood profil fotoğrafı
LeQuisha Underwood3 yıl önce

@LindsayKemeny Thank you for saying it out loud. I had an admin put the entire school on a data wall. Ss would see themselves as “red” for below level. Whew I was so upset. They wouldn’t listen to me about the self esteem issues it caused. It was reading data but it still applies.

teachfraser profil fotoğrafı
teachfraser3 yıl önce

Agree! And also, if could better spend my time providing instruction to those that need it rather than updating data bulletin boards.

J. Z. profil fotoğrafı
J. Z.3 yıl önce

Data wall where students write what they accomplished that was an individual goal. One might write- on time 3 days; another might write passed 2 book quizzes. Celebrate each child’s accomplishments.

Benzer Videolar

David Friedberg: Michael Burry’s Datacenter Math is Wrong “I actually think Michael Burberry's got this wrong.” “What Michael Burry is saying is that all of these hyperscalers have extended their depreciation schedule or the useful life of their data centers by roughly 2x, which cuts the operating costs in half when they report it in earnings. And so it's making their earnings inflate.” “So he's claiming they're cooking the books. Google first made this change in Q1 of 2021, where they said the servers are now going from 3 to 4 years. Separately in 2021, Google took networking equipment from 3 to 5 years. And then in 2023, they took it from 5 to 6 years.” “And so this is a result of this effort where they went in and did an analysis. So what happened?” “What happened in the data centers is that the data centers transitioned from being primarily data storage and data transfer systems, where you would use hard drives and RAM and memory to store data and then transmit it back out, to being data processing centers because of the AI boom.” “So as AI became more important in the data center, more of the dollars that are going into data centers were allocated towards chips from data storage, which initially was hard drives.” “And then suddenly, when you put these processors in to process the data to do AI, the majority of the spend and the majority of the energy is going towards the processors.” “I made some calls and I checked around with some other friends, and everyone says the same thing: that these 7-8 year old TPUs and GPUs that are sitting in the data centers are still being used and they're being used at 100% utilization.” “So that actually justifies and validates the depreciation schedule being much longer versus shorter.”

The All-In Podcast

304,297 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce