Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Kids math data should be private. All those rocket ships and ice cream cones where they are in these competitive fluency races against each other does not motivate the ones who need it the most! Individual data binders where kids track their own data is what works!

49,095 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Debra Kowalkowski
Debra Kowalkowski3 лет назад

Thank you for boldly calling out this inequitable math practice that is widely used and is harmful to all learners! We must be well informed as well as well-intentioned (thinking that public posting of progress is motivation).

Фото профиля Principal Cabana
Principal Cabana3 лет назад

I could not agree more !

Фото профиля Parvathi Sivaraman PhD.
Parvathi Sivaraman PhD.3 лет назад

@Mathgarden Love this! Thank you reiterating this. Planning to have a year long tracker this year so kids can see their progress even if they are "behind" grade level.

Фото профиля J McMahon
J McMahon3 лет назад

Amen! I once asked coworkers who had math data on display, “Would you want your teacher evaluation on display for everyone to see?”

Фото профиля Tracie Anthony
Tracie Anthony3 лет назад

Yes! Yes! Yes!

Фото профиля Sneakin’🎶🎶Sally
Sneakin’🎶🎶Sally3 лет назад

@pearse_margie Yep. That’s how I do it in 4th.

Фото профиля Somer Drost
Somer Drost3 лет назад

Yes!!!

Фото профиля LeQuisha Underwood
LeQuisha Underwood3 лет назад

@LindsayKemeny Thank you for saying it out loud. I had an admin put the entire school on a data wall. Ss would see themselves as “red” for below level. Whew I was so upset. They wouldn’t listen to me about the self esteem issues it caused. It was reading data but it still applies.

Фото профиля teachfraser
teachfraser3 лет назад

Agree! And also, if could better spend my time providing instruction to those that need it rather than updating data bulletin boards.

Фото профиля J. Z.
J. Z.3 лет назад

Data wall where students write what they accomplished that was an individual goal. One might write- on time 3 days; another might write passed 2 book quizzes. Celebrate each child’s accomplishments.

Похожие видео

David Friedberg: Michael Burry’s Datacenter Math is Wrong “I actually think Michael Burberry's got this wrong.” “What Michael Burry is saying is that all of these hyperscalers have extended their depreciation schedule or the useful life of their data centers by roughly 2x, which cuts the operating costs in half when they report it in earnings. And so it's making their earnings inflate.” “So he's claiming they're cooking the books. Google first made this change in Q1 of 2021, where they said the servers are now going from 3 to 4 years. Separately in 2021, Google took networking equipment from 3 to 5 years. And then in 2023, they took it from 5 to 6 years.” “And so this is a result of this effort where they went in and did an analysis. So what happened?” “What happened in the data centers is that the data centers transitioned from being primarily data storage and data transfer systems, where you would use hard drives and RAM and memory to store data and then transmit it back out, to being data processing centers because of the AI boom.” “So as AI became more important in the data center, more of the dollars that are going into data centers were allocated towards chips from data storage, which initially was hard drives.” “And then suddenly, when you put these processors in to process the data to do AI, the majority of the spend and the majority of the energy is going towards the processors.” “I made some calls and I checked around with some other friends, and everyone says the same thing: that these 7-8 year old TPUs and GPUs that are sitting in the data centers are still being used and they're being used at 100% utilization.” “So that actually justifies and validates the depreciation schedule being much longer versus shorter.”

The All-In Podcast

304,297 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

NyaraVT is truly obsessed with kids. He is obsessed with specifically "trans kids" in the context that he thinks kids should be groomed and given HRT and puberty blockers early, because he thinks it's "cruel" to allow trans people to go through puberty. Trans kids never exist outside of being groomed. The literature supporting it is all from delusional progressives who are biased, often projecting their own ideologies into areas that do not belong. Any who do "socially transition" as youths desist by the time they are adults, often as much as 90%+ For example, kids do not understand sex when they are 4. Anyone implying that kids are "trans" is just a creepy adult who is just projecting adult framing of sexuality to a child who is exploring the world through play. Any adult who tries to label their kids trans based on early play behavior, by 'teaching' the child sexual play, is by definition grooming and child sexual abuse. At best, this causes iatrogenic harm to the child and leads to lifelong mental and health issues even without any overt CSA. Of course, the reality is that puberty isn't optional. It is a biological and physiological need; without it, these people grow up with endless mental and physical health problems. The Cass review and many other critical studies show that puberty blockers and early HRT do not produce the "positive outcomes" these trans kids activists claim that they do. Even before modern times, historical child psychiatry and sexology are rife with data problems, scandals, controversies, and actual child sexual abuse incidents. Anyone still trusting the data of these "studies" blindly should be ignored completely. TLDR, Trans kids should not be a thing, and anyone promoting it should be treated with extreme suspicion.

Emerald Apple

96,483 просмотров • 13 дней назад