Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Kiko Barzaga released this video today on his FB timeline. First lines pa lang mali-mali na. FYI, Pres. Marcos did not issue an arrest warrant against Bato dela Rosa. The ICC allegedly did. Bato dela Rosa was the implementor of Duterte’s “war on drugs”. Dapat lang managot sya sa... ICC, di ba? Duterte was not arrested by Marcos. The Interpol did. The PNP cooperated because the Philippines is an Interpol member. If makukukong man si Sen. Bong Go, Sen. Joel Villanueva, and Sen. Rodante Marcoleta, dapat ang tanong mo: ano ba ang kaso nila? Non-bailable ba ang kaso nila? Bakit ikukulong kung walang kasalanan? Unahan mo kaya mag-rally sa Malacañang? Yung Forbes Park rally mo nga nilangaw. Pumunta ka lang dun para magpa photo-ops tapos umalis ka naman kaagad!show more

Thea Tan

4,585 subscribers

97,412 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

33 Comments

PorLaPatria1896 🇵🇭 🫡10 months ago

So long as the media and people keep patronizing this fucking lunatic's lies, fake news and wild pronouncements we wil just be wasting time refuting someone who should be ignored and isolated.

Alejandro10 months ago

LMAOOOOO BAHAHAHAHAHA

BLEU 🚘🗽🛩️⛳️10 months ago

It’s disgusting how the media continues to give exposure to that nincompoop. What’s even more appalling is how the Dumb and Dumber Shitheads believe and proudly accept his idiotic ramblings.

Demiurge 🇵🇭10 months ago

So yung mga magnanakaw ang kakampi ng mga DDS??? Joel “PDAF” nakaw

Thea Tan10 months ago

Naghilamos na ba sya bago mag speech? Mukhang hindi.

bettyboop201510 months ago

Jusmio! Kay Trillanes pa lang di ka na uubra!

Alejandro10 months ago

ROBIN WILLIAMS: ALWAYS HAPPY AND MANY ADORED HIM 🐈‍⬛️ KATE SPADE DAD TALK TO🐈🐈‍⬛️ HER SO CHEERFUL AN HOUR BEFORE SHE DIED, CONG MEOW KIKO BARZAYAD MENTAL ISSUES LISTENING TO HIS CAT ADVICE MEANS HE NEEDED MENTAL HELP ‼️🐈‍⬛️🐈

Unknown Traveler 🇺🇸10 months ago

He looks like he's struggling with serious substance misuse/abuse issues, honestly

Raymond de Leon10 months ago

PDEA should investigate whatever this kid is smokin’. It must be really strong stuff that it has affected his brain cells, whatever is left out of it.

Dyowa ni Ineng10 months ago

HOR should make meow toyo barsaga head of TROLL COMMITTEE DESERVE IDIOT

Pitchy10 months ago

Tama na Buang....gusto mo ikaw ang isusunod ng ICC. eh....meoww meowww...😂😂😂😂😂😂😃😃

@donrey2510 months ago

Bakit hinayaan ng congress yan dapat tinanggal na nila yan obvious naman ang mga binitiwan salita ynan wala na bang magawa ang congress sa mga member nilang ganoon nakakahiya naman..

#JJMaw10 months ago

Kung walang basbas ni Marcos di gagawin ng PNP yan, siya yung commander in chief.

Willardo Remo Jr10 months ago

Liar na yan si Kiko, ayaw pa ayusin yung necktie niya. In all aspects, nakakabuwisit siya every time we see him in social media.

Xid10 months ago

Mga kapwa nitong may saltik maniniwala jan tulad ng mga DDS same feathers flock together

Watcher12310 months ago

It just shows the we Filipinos elected another unintelligent Congressman we do not deserve.

zypher10 months ago

TUTANG TUTA NG MGA DUTERTE

Precious Gem10 months ago

ICC ang naglabas warrant, hindi si Marcos. Tanga!

Krss 💖💚10 months ago

Pwede ba sipain na yan sa congress? Duterte serving ang atake not serving the people. Sayang ung sahod niyan

noyen gomez10 months ago

High ka ba Kiko? Nagtatanong lang.

Ina Ng10 months ago

he is lucky at least he will go thru judicial process, their victims didnt even have a chance

Commander Ley Ordenes NAVY10 months ago

FAKE News ni Okiks

adrian10 months ago

OJT ba si Kiko ng Duts clan?

mm10 months ago

You are not helping the country by using your platform in spreading lies! Quiet now, Meow!

Kinder_Farmer10 months ago

Vote-buying baby. Tinalo si mistah ko, Commander ___, ex-Navy SEAL WPS warrior_patriot, highly experienced executive/manager here and abroad, with vision. Ibinoto yang idiot na yan dahil sa baryang ayuda/suhol.

Bernadeth Serrano10 months ago

Napakasinungaling ng batang to ang lakas ng amats🙄

ewan10 months ago

Pebbles is accountable sa chief implementor of their so-called war on drugs...

Benjamin N10 months ago

He speaks nonsense and lies openly, yet his followers still believe him. The blame isn’t just on him, it’s on those who let him continue.

Suckrates10 months ago

Now na ba ang people power naming mga DDS? 🤭

JJ Art10 months ago

Parang TANGA lang!

malvs🇵🇭10 months ago

Ano aasahan sa isang malaki KUPAL na pusang galang bayut?! Animal yan!

DL S Uy10 months ago

Mukhang lasing ang itsura

HAPPY PEPE10 months ago

Sabog na sabog si kiko dito

Related Videos

and then when ppl in the cs tryna call u out jinujustify mo na di uncomfy si 🐺 sa joke mo just because nandon parin sya nanunuod sainyo? lol putting in c's mouth ha? sino ba kayo para kayo pa ang mag desisyon kung uncomfy sya or hindi? fans lang din kayo gaya namin! pero napaka weird ng behavior nyo! sa nakikita ko naman nasa tamang edad na kayo para malaman kung ano ang tama at mali pero parang proud na proud pa kayo sa ginagawa nyo at hindi nyo matanggap na mali ginagawa nyo. tapos sa dulo kayo pa ang nag papavictim at paawa? bunch of weirdos! nananawagan ako sa mga fs dyan, pag may events kayo pls pakitandaan mga mukha nila at pakiban! don't let them go near 🐺 this is so alarming!!!

and then when ppl in the cs tryna call u out jinujustify mo na di uncomfy si 🐺 sa joke mo just because nandon parin sya nanunuod sainyo? lol putting in c's mouth ha? sino ba kayo para kayo pa ang mag desisyon kung uncomfy sya or hindi? fans lang din kayo gaya namin! pero napaka weird ng behavior nyo! sa nakikita ko naman nasa tamang edad na kayo para malaman kung ano ang tama at mali pero parang proud na proud pa kayo sa ginagawa nyo at hindi nyo matanggap na mali ginagawa nyo. tapos sa dulo kayo pa ang nag papavictim at paawa? bunch of weirdos! nananawagan ako sa mga fs dyan, pag may events kayo pls pakitandaan mga mukha nila at pakiban! don't let them go near 🐺 this is so alarming!!!

mira

71,826 views • 2 months ago

‘AKO BA’Y I-SHU-SHOOT DITO O IPADADALA SA [THE] HAGUE?’ Senator Robin Padilla claimed that the Senate minority is being targeted one by one as he raised the possibility of facing an obstruction of justice charge for allegedly helping Senator Bato dela Rosa escape. “Iniisa-isa na po kami. Hindi po magtatagal, ma-shu-shoot na naman ako. Ang katanungan na lang ngayon: kung ako po’y i-shu-shoot dito o ipadadala sa [The] Hague,” he said during the third day of Iglesia ni Cristo’s rally at Liwasang Bonifacio on Thursday. While Padilla alleged that the International Criminal Court (ICC) has an arrest warrant against him for obstruction of justice, ICC-accredited Assistant to Counsel Atty. Kristina Conti previously clarified that the Philippine government, not the ICC, may hold Padilla liable for allegedly assisting Dela Rosa's escape. (Video by Ryan Baldemor/The Philippine STAR)

‘AKO BA’Y I-SHU-SHOOT DITO O IPADADALA SA [THE] HAGUE?’ Senator Robin Padilla claimed that the Senate minority is being targeted one by one as he raised the possibility of facing an obstruction of justice charge for allegedly helping Senator Bato dela Rosa escape. “Iniisa-isa na po kami. Hindi po magtatagal, ma-shu-shoot na naman ako. Ang katanungan na lang ngayon: kung ako po’y i-shu-shoot dito o ipadadala sa [The] Hague,” he said during the third day of Iglesia ni Cristo’s rally at Liwasang Bonifacio on Thursday. While Padilla alleged that the International Criminal Court (ICC) has an arrest warrant against him for obstruction of justice, ICC-accredited Assistant to Counsel Atty. Kristina Conti previously clarified that the Philippine government, not the ICC, may hold Padilla liable for allegedly assisting Dela Rosa's escape. (Video by Ryan Baldemor/The Philippine STAR)

The Philippine Star

49,394 views • 2 months ago

May El Niño ba sa utak ni Lustay? Parang wala na kasing mapiga even an iota of understanding on how oil prices actually work. Free naman magbasa kung may time pero hindi magawa? Ghorl, dependent ba ang presyo ng langis sa kung saan ito binili? You make it sound like the Philippines is stuck with the Middle East. Sila lang ba ang may langis? What about the other oil-producing countries outside the region? Yes, a large portion of our imports from the Middle East is crude oil; but the Philippines also sources from other suppliers like Russia, Malaysia, and other countries (possibly Latin America and Africa). For refined fuel, we import from Malaysia, South Korea, Singapore, China and other regional suppliers. Which means: may alternative sources na ang Pilipinas. So, tanong: since may alternatives tayo, bumaba ba ang presyo ng langis? HINDI. Because oil prices are not determined by where the Philippines buys. Prices are set by global benchmarks. We can switch suppliers all we want, but if global prices are high, mataas pa rin ang presyo sa Pilipinas dahil private sector ang nagse-set ng presyo depende sa kung magkano ang bili nila. Alangan naman malugi sila. (Oil Deregulation Law yan). So, the claim that prices will keep rising unless we find alternatives to the Middle East speaks more of your brain’s capacity to understand the oil market. Even countries that don’t rely on the Middle East are affected because the market is global. And like I posted before, the Philippines is a price taker, not a price setter. We don’t influence prices, we follow them. Hindi naman tayo member ng OPEC+ to be able to influence the price. Kahit saan pa tayo bumili, kung mataas ang presyo sa global market, mataas pa rin ang babayaran natin. So, again, remind us, bakit gusto mo ulit maging presidente kung basic global pricing mechanics hindi mo gets?

May El Niño ba sa utak ni Lustay? Parang wala na kasing mapiga even an iota of understanding on how oil prices actually work. Free naman magbasa kung may time pero hindi magawa? Ghorl, dependent ba ang presyo ng langis sa kung saan ito binili? You make it sound like the Philippines is stuck with the Middle East. Sila lang ba ang may langis? What about the other oil-producing countries outside the region? Yes, a large portion of our imports from the Middle East is crude oil; but the Philippines also sources from other suppliers like Russia, Malaysia, and other countries (possibly Latin America and Africa). For refined fuel, we import from Malaysia, South Korea, Singapore, China and other regional suppliers. Which means: may alternative sources na ang Pilipinas. So, tanong: since may alternatives tayo, bumaba ba ang presyo ng langis? HINDI. Because oil prices are not determined by where the Philippines buys. Prices are set by global benchmarks. We can switch suppliers all we want, but if global prices are high, mataas pa rin ang presyo sa Pilipinas dahil private sector ang nagse-set ng presyo depende sa kung magkano ang bili nila. Alangan naman malugi sila. (Oil Deregulation Law yan). So, the claim that prices will keep rising unless we find alternatives to the Middle East speaks more of your brain’s capacity to understand the oil market. Even countries that don’t rely on the Middle East are affected because the market is global. And like I posted before, the Philippines is a price taker, not a price setter. We don’t influence prices, we follow them. Hindi naman tayo member ng OPEC+ to be able to influence the price. Kahit saan pa tayo bumili, kung mataas ang presyo sa global market, mataas pa rin ang babayaran natin. So, again, remind us, bakit gusto mo ulit maging presidente kung basic global pricing mechanics hindi mo gets?

Thea Tan

18,603 views • 5 months ago

WE DO NOT NEED THE ICC OR INTERPOL TO HANDCUFF BATO, YONG SINASABI NILANG SUNDALONG KANIN OKs NA, Sonny Trillanes IV, please do the honor, we are behind you! On a serious note, Bato rose from one-star general to the first Chief of Police under Duterte. He must have been deadly loyal to Rodrigo Duterte, because why else would someone leapfrog four- or five-star generals who had worked their way up the ranks, right? Pero who are we kidding, diba? Bato was Duterte’s EJK implementor in Davao. He knows the ins and outs of operations that ran smoothly for years, if not decades, since the day they were implemented in Davao. Therefore, to appoint someone who could replicate Digong’s drug war nationwide, it had to be Bato dela Rosa. HENCE HE IS EQUALLY GUILTY OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. Damning kicker, Digong, Bato, and all their cohorts are convinced their war on drugs was a roaring success and that they are so powerful that our justice system can’t lay a finger on them. That’s where the overflowing bravado comes from. They even dare their critics, AND the ICC publicly. “Come and arrest us, quick!” Now the alleged ICC arrest warrant for Bato dela Rosa is out earlier than expected. Will this swag/paCOOL senator voluntarily surrender if the Marcos admin cooperates with Interpol? I mean, why resist, diba? I DON’T A FUGITIVE WORKAROUND IS IN HIS CARDS, LOL. He’s a law-abiding law enforcer, diba? Isa pa, at the ICC detention center they won’t get the “Davao treatment” they dished out back home. They’ll have their day in an international court to defend themselves and prove their innocence. Anyway, will the 2019 No. 1 senator, Robinhood Padilla, tag along? He bravely stepped into the spotlight to declare solidarity with Bato and Digong’s “war on drugs morality.” Diba? Tingnan natin kong may bayag si sir! 🌶️

WE DO NOT NEED THE ICC OR INTERPOL TO HANDCUFF BATO, YONG SINASABI NILANG SUNDALONG KANIN OKs NA, Sonny Trillanes IV, please do the honor, we are behind you! On a serious note, Bato rose from one-star general to the first Chief of Police under Duterte. He must have been deadly loyal to Rodrigo Duterte, because why else would someone leapfrog four- or five-star generals who had worked their way up the ranks, right? Pero who are we kidding, diba? Bato was Duterte’s EJK implementor in Davao. He knows the ins and outs of operations that ran smoothly for years, if not decades, since the day they were implemented in Davao. Therefore, to appoint someone who could replicate Digong’s drug war nationwide, it had to be Bato dela Rosa. HENCE HE IS EQUALLY GUILTY OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. Damning kicker, Digong, Bato, and all their cohorts are convinced their war on drugs was a roaring success and that they are so powerful that our justice system can’t lay a finger on them. That’s where the overflowing bravado comes from. They even dare their critics, AND the ICC publicly. “Come and arrest us, quick!” Now the alleged ICC arrest warrant for Bato dela Rosa is out earlier than expected. Will this swag/paCOOL senator voluntarily surrender if the Marcos admin cooperates with Interpol? I mean, why resist, diba? I DON’T A FUGITIVE WORKAROUND IS IN HIS CARDS, LOL. He’s a law-abiding law enforcer, diba? Isa pa, at the ICC detention center they won’t get the “Davao treatment” they dished out back home. They’ll have their day in an international court to defend themselves and prove their innocence. Anyway, will the 2019 No. 1 senator, Robinhood Padilla, tag along? He bravely stepped into the spotlight to declare solidarity with Bato and Digong’s “war on drugs morality.” Diba? Tingnan natin kong may bayag si sir! 🌶️

Facts & Politics

144,362 views • 10 months ago

PADILLA ON RUNNING FOR VP: ‘PAG UTOS NI DIGONG WATCH: Senator Robin Padilla says he wants to give way to more senior politicians as a potential running mate of Vice President Sara Duterte in the 2028 presidential elections. He mentions Senators Imee Marcos, Alan Peter Cayetano, Bong Go, and Bato dela Rosa. “Mayroong hierarchy ‘yan e, hindi pwedeng ako agad,” Padilla said. However, when pressed for a categorical answer on whether he is open to running for vice president, Padilla said he would do so if former President Rodrigo Duterte asks him to. “‘Pag utos ni Digong — walang pwedeng mag-utos sa akin kahit sino, si Digong lang,” he said. Asked if he would be ready to serve as vice president, Padilla responded: “Ipinanganak po tayong ready. Lalo na ‘yan, para sa akin… vice president, hindi naman masyadong ano ‘yan…puro advocacy lang ‘yan e. Parang ikaw ang spare tire, ‘di ba? Kayang kaya ‘yan.” | Eimor Santos

PADILLA ON RUNNING FOR VP: ‘PAG UTOS NI DIGONG WATCH: Senator Robin Padilla says he wants to give way to more senior politicians as a potential running mate of Vice President Sara Duterte in the 2028 presidential elections. He mentions Senators Imee Marcos, Alan Peter Cayetano, Bong Go, and Bato dela Rosa. “Mayroong hierarchy ‘yan e, hindi pwedeng ako agad,” Padilla said. However, when pressed for a categorical answer on whether he is open to running for vice president, Padilla said he would do so if former President Rodrigo Duterte asks him to. “‘Pag utos ni Digong — walang pwedeng mag-utos sa akin kahit sino, si Digong lang,” he said. Asked if he would be ready to serve as vice president, Padilla responded: “Ipinanganak po tayong ready. Lalo na ‘yan, para sa akin… vice president, hindi naman masyadong ano ‘yan…puro advocacy lang ‘yan e. Parang ikaw ang spare tire, ‘di ba? Kayang kaya ‘yan.” | Eimor Santos

NewsWatch Plus PH

22,996 views • 7 months ago

Ive always wanted to post this whole conversation.. BIANCA' S PARENTS MUST HAVE AVAILED THE LIVESTREAM.. THATS WHY THEY NEVER judged DUSTIN. LIKE his haters did who probably watch it in Primetime, which is super edited or on tiktok vids who surely spliced it even more... to paint a certain narrative. He is just emotional of what happened.. Aminado nman silang lahat na sinadya nilang asarin sya ng paulit ulit. Kaya nya natawag na insensitive si michael kasi alam ng hurt na sya di pa rin tumitigil. ( even josh shared his experience with Michae and kira ) When he said di sya sanay sa ganun babae : putol lang kasi pero at the start of the video.. Dustin : ipaparinig mo na may gusto kang iba. my favorite part? How he explained "makakaapekto yun sa tingin ko syo." Dustin: ganun nman kasi talaga like yung actions natin.. for example sipain ko yan (cup tower) kahit sabihin kong joke lang nman anu magiging tingin mo sa kin? KUPS AKO. ginawa ko sya eh.. If anything this video proves kung gano nya talaga kagusto si Bianca from the start. Na before the incident puro positive lang yung nakikita nya sa kanya... and he was really happy. Natawa pa ko sa part na sabi nya.. Ienjoy na lang daw nya.. (stay sa PBB) di nman daw kailangan (lovelife) .. tapos sasabihin nyo sya ang may hanap ng loveteam... and sna na-air yung part na to.. Josh : outside ba di ka inaasar ng tropa mo? Dustin: inaasar nila ako sa gusto ko.. Hinde yung ganun.. Yung harapan tapos tropa tapos babae (na yung mga tropa nya tutuksuhin yung isa pa nyang tropa sa gusto nyang girl ) 😂 GETS?? he also mentioned that at that point.. they've had serious conversations na about family etc. Josh even asked if maingay pa din si bianca during those talks.. Dustin: TAHIMIK i also appreciate how he stopped talking when he noticed cameras were on him and how he said mabait si brenty. ( na di rin comfortable kay michael by the way eh first duo nya 😂) i hope everyone should see this.. the very conversation that has been blown out of proportion.. All villains have Backstories.. YES! but Dustin? he wasnt the villain...his backstory? makes him the victim.. Thank you sa pag edit sa primetime.. berigood kayo. #dustbia #dustinyu #BIANCADEVERA

Ive always wanted to post this whole conversation.. BIANCA' S PARENTS MUST HAVE AVAILED THE LIVESTREAM.. THATS WHY THEY NEVER judged DUSTIN. LIKE his haters did who probably watch it in Primetime, which is super edited or on tiktok vids who surely spliced it even more... to paint a certain narrative. He is just emotional of what happened.. Aminado nman silang lahat na sinadya nilang asarin sya ng paulit ulit. Kaya nya natawag na insensitive si michael kasi alam ng hurt na sya di pa rin tumitigil. ( even josh shared his experience with Michae and kira ) When he said di sya sanay sa ganun babae : putol lang kasi pero at the start of the video.. Dustin : ipaparinig mo na may gusto kang iba. my favorite part? How he explained "makakaapekto yun sa tingin ko syo." Dustin: ganun nman kasi talaga like yung actions natin.. for example sipain ko yan (cup tower) kahit sabihin kong joke lang nman anu magiging tingin mo sa kin? KUPS AKO. ginawa ko sya eh.. If anything this video proves kung gano nya talaga kagusto si Bianca from the start. Na before the incident puro positive lang yung nakikita nya sa kanya... and he was really happy. Natawa pa ko sa part na sabi nya.. Ienjoy na lang daw nya.. (stay sa PBB) di nman daw kailangan (lovelife) .. tapos sasabihin nyo sya ang may hanap ng loveteam... and sna na-air yung part na to.. Josh : outside ba di ka inaasar ng tropa mo? Dustin: inaasar nila ako sa gusto ko.. Hinde yung ganun.. Yung harapan tapos tropa tapos babae (na yung mga tropa nya tutuksuhin yung isa pa nyang tropa sa gusto nyang girl ) 😂 GETS?? he also mentioned that at that point.. they've had serious conversations na about family etc. Josh even asked if maingay pa din si bianca during those talks.. Dustin: TAHIMIK i also appreciate how he stopped talking when he noticed cameras were on him and how he said mabait si brenty. ( na di rin comfortable kay michael by the way eh first duo nya 😂) i hope everyone should see this.. the very conversation that has been blown out of proportion.. All villains have Backstories.. YES! but Dustin? he wasnt the villain...his backstory? makes him the victim.. Thank you sa pag edit sa primetime.. berigood kayo. #dustbia #dustinyu #BIANCADEVERA

little old me

54,958 views • 1 year ago

WATCH: President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. gives an update on his health, recent food craving, and activities. At the beginning of the video, Marcos is playfully interacting with their family dog, “Oreo.” "Ang galing ng mga doktor ko. Binigyan lang ako ng mga gamot tsaka patuloy pa rin yung aking antibiotics. Pero okay na ako. In fact, nakapag EDC [Economy and Development Council] meeting na kami nung Lunes with most of the Cabinet." "Puro sabaw lang ako. Kaya nanaginip ako nung isang gabi. Sabi ko sa doktor, 'pwede na ba ako kumain ng kung ano-ano?' Kasi nanaginip ako, nakakain ako ng steak." On why he was absent at the Pagpupugay 2025: Parangal sa mga Lingkod Bayani awarding ceremony at Malacañang on Wednesday morning: “Nandito yung mga doktor, nag-consulta sila para tignan na talagang maayos. Kasi nangre-reklamo sila na dapat magpahinga ako. Sabi ko, hindi ako pwedeng magpahinga. Hindi ako kasama diyan sa mga pahinga." “Maraming salamat sa lahat ng tao that have been concerned about my health. Maraming nagpadala ng mga mensahe na gumaling ka na kagad. Sabi ko, nagpapasalamat ako sa kanila. Thank you for your concern.” “But as I said, I got the best possible medical care that you can have. That's why I'm already back in harness.” | Luisa Cabato

WATCH: President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. gives an update on his health, recent food craving, and activities. At the beginning of the video, Marcos is playfully interacting with their family dog, “Oreo.” "Ang galing ng mga doktor ko. Binigyan lang ako ng mga gamot tsaka patuloy pa rin yung aking antibiotics. Pero okay na ako. In fact, nakapag EDC [Economy and Development Council] meeting na kami nung Lunes with most of the Cabinet." "Puro sabaw lang ako. Kaya nanaginip ako nung isang gabi. Sabi ko sa doktor, 'pwede na ba ako kumain ng kung ano-ano?' Kasi nanaginip ako, nakakain ako ng steak." On why he was absent at the Pagpupugay 2025: Parangal sa mga Lingkod Bayani awarding ceremony at Malacañang on Wednesday morning: “Nandito yung mga doktor, nag-consulta sila para tignan na talagang maayos. Kasi nangre-reklamo sila na dapat magpahinga ako. Sabi ko, hindi ako pwedeng magpahinga. Hindi ako kasama diyan sa mga pahinga." “Maraming salamat sa lahat ng tao that have been concerned about my health. Maraming nagpadala ng mga mensahe na gumaling ka na kagad. Sabi ko, nagpapasalamat ako sa kanila. Thank you for your concern.” “But as I said, I got the best possible medical care that you can have. That's why I'm already back in harness.” | Luisa Cabato

Inquirer

13,972 views • 8 months ago

SHARON CUNETA DEFENDS KIKO PANGILINAN FROM 'FAKE NEWS,' URGES SUPPORT FOR SENATE BID Megastar Sharon Cuneta spoke out against what she described as relentless fake news targeting her husband, former Sen. Kiko Pangilinan, as he seeks a return to the Senate. "Alam niyo po, ang tagal kong pinag-isipan kung papatulan ko pa ba o palalagpasin ko na lang 'yung mga paninira kay Kiko. Eh, wala hong tigil ang mga tsismis na peke naman tungkol sa kanya lalo po ngayon na siya ay tumatakbo ulit para senador," Cuneta said in a video message on Monday, February 24. She lamented the widespread influence of social media in spreading misinformation, particularly against political opponents. "Isa pa, ayon po sa mga social scientists, kapag daw ang isang kasinungalingan o fake news ay paulit-ulit pong pinagkalat at paulit-ulit pinakita sa inyo o sa taong bayan, maya-maya po, aba'y, mayroon na pong maniniwala. Ganun po kasi parang brainwashing, 'di ho ba?" she said. Emphasizing Pangilinan's integrity, Cuneta assured voters that in their nearly 30 years of marriage, he has been a devoted husband and father who always keeps his promises. "In our almost 30 years of marriage, si Kiko po ay walang ginawa kundi maging mabuting asawa at ama. Pag siya po ay nangako, talaga pong harangan mo ng sibat kailangan pong tuparin niya," she said. She reiterated his commitment to revitalizing the country's agriculture sector and lowering food prices, saying, "Isusugod ni Kiko ang agrikultura sa Pilipinas at gagawin ang lahat para pababain muli ang presyo ng pagkain. Promise po." Cuneta ended her message with a strong endorsement, urging voters to support Pangilinan. "Ito po, si Kiko Pangilina na po. Number one sa akin, number 51 po sa balota," she said.

SHARON CUNETA DEFENDS KIKO PANGILINAN FROM 'FAKE NEWS,' URGES SUPPORT FOR SENATE BID Megastar Sharon Cuneta spoke out against what she described as relentless fake news targeting her husband, former Sen. Kiko Pangilinan, as he seeks a return to the Senate. "Alam niyo po, ang tagal kong pinag-isipan kung papatulan ko pa ba o palalagpasin ko na lang 'yung mga paninira kay Kiko. Eh, wala hong tigil ang mga tsismis na peke naman tungkol sa kanya lalo po ngayon na siya ay tumatakbo ulit para senador," Cuneta said in a video message on Monday, February 24. She lamented the widespread influence of social media in spreading misinformation, particularly against political opponents. "Isa pa, ayon po sa mga social scientists, kapag daw ang isang kasinungalingan o fake news ay paulit-ulit pong pinagkalat at paulit-ulit pinakita sa inyo o sa taong bayan, maya-maya po, aba'y, mayroon na pong maniniwala. Ganun po kasi parang brainwashing, 'di ho ba?" she said. Emphasizing Pangilinan's integrity, Cuneta assured voters that in their nearly 30 years of marriage, he has been a devoted husband and father who always keeps his promises. "In our almost 30 years of marriage, si Kiko po ay walang ginawa kundi maging mabuting asawa at ama. Pag siya po ay nangako, talaga pong harangan mo ng sibat kailangan pong tuparin niya," she said. She reiterated his commitment to revitalizing the country's agriculture sector and lowering food prices, saying, "Isusugod ni Kiko ang agrikultura sa Pilipinas at gagawin ang lahat para pababain muli ang presyo ng pagkain. Promise po." Cuneta ended her message with a strong endorsement, urging voters to support Pangilinan. "Ito po, si Kiko Pangilina na po. Number one sa akin, number 51 po sa balota," she said.

iMPACT Leadership

67,031 views • 1 year ago

Grabe, yung gay issues kay Alden, hindi na talaga namamatay. 😂 Eh pinatotohanan na nga nina Julie and Maine yung mga sinabi ni Alden. 🤷🏻‍♀️ EXCEPT, of course, yung kay Wyn Wyn. Mukhang hindi niya nabasa na romantic pala yung mga pinakita ni Alden back then. 😂 And just recently, sinabi ni Alden kay Karen Davila na na-reject na siya sa love. Which is very different from his statements before Hello, Love, Again na hindi pa siya nababasted. So yes, possible na hindi nag-work out with Kath if he ever pursued her. And knowing now that she’s with the mayor... And thats OK.. Kabawasan ba kay Alden yun? I don't think so. And I certainly wouldn't hold it against Kath either. Like… some people are simply not meant to be. SIMPLE. 😂 Ang funny lang kasi sobrang cliche na sa showbiz...kapag walang girlfriend, hindi brusko, or hindi womanizer ang image… bakla agad. 😂 Can we PLEASE level up the discourse? 15 years na si Alden sa industry. A LIST artist at that... For sure, in all those years, kung totoong ganoon siya, kahit isang concrete proof man lang dapat may lumabas na. Andami nang nabubuking na issues involving people who aren't even close to his level of fame. Pero kay Alden? Blind item. Chismis. "May nagsabi"... Walang bang "Nakakita" Di nman pwede yung naamoy lang natin hahahahaha Ganun na ba talaga tayo kababaw? We believe every rumor just because it fits the narrative we already want to believe. Hindi lahat ng chismis nagiging fact dahil lang paulit-ulit niyong sinasabi. Diba pwedeng may certain type lang talaga siya? 😂 Kasi if you look at the girls he has openly liked or been linked to, may common denominator naman. Women with substance. Matatalino. Simple pero malakas ang dating. Sexy in their own way.. May sariling identity. May presence. Hindi yung kailangan loud or trying hard para mapansin. Maybe that’s simply his type. Maybe it takes time for him to genuinely develop feelings for a girl because he doesn’t do playtime. Hindi lahat ng lalaki kailangan may roster para mapatunayan ang pagkalalaki. 😂 Bawal ba maging softie ang lalaki? Bawal ba maging selective? Bawal ba yung slow burn instead of collecting women for validation? Because honestly, kadalasan MAS lalaki pa yung mga ganyang tipo kaysa sa mga trying-hard maging playboy just to prove something. There’s nothing weak about a man who knows what he wants, takes his time, protects his heart, and doesn’t give it away just to satisfy expectations. And honestly, mas interesting pa nga yun kaysa pilit nating hanapan ng malisya ang isang lalaki just because he doesn't fit the usual showbiz stereotype.. Kaya tayo binabaha eh. Ang dali nating maniwala sa tsismis. 😂 VOTE WISELY.. KEME😂 #ALDENRICHARDS

Grabe, yung gay issues kay Alden, hindi na talaga namamatay. 😂 Eh pinatotohanan na nga nina Julie and Maine yung mga sinabi ni Alden. 🤷🏻‍♀️ EXCEPT, of course, yung kay Wyn Wyn. Mukhang hindi niya nabasa na romantic pala yung mga pinakita ni Alden back then. 😂 And just recently, sinabi ni Alden kay Karen Davila na na-reject na siya sa love. Which is very different from his statements before Hello, Love, Again na hindi pa siya nababasted. So yes, possible na hindi nag-work out with Kath if he ever pursued her. And knowing now that she’s with the mayor... And thats OK.. Kabawasan ba kay Alden yun? I don't think so. And I certainly wouldn't hold it against Kath either. Like… some people are simply not meant to be. SIMPLE. 😂 Ang funny lang kasi sobrang cliche na sa showbiz...kapag walang girlfriend, hindi brusko, or hindi womanizer ang image… bakla agad. 😂 Can we PLEASE level up the discourse? 15 years na si Alden sa industry. A LIST artist at that... For sure, in all those years, kung totoong ganoon siya, kahit isang concrete proof man lang dapat may lumabas na. Andami nang nabubuking na issues involving people who aren't even close to his level of fame. Pero kay Alden? Blind item. Chismis. "May nagsabi"... Walang bang "Nakakita" Di nman pwede yung naamoy lang natin hahahahaha Ganun na ba talaga tayo kababaw? We believe every rumor just because it fits the narrative we already want to believe. Hindi lahat ng chismis nagiging fact dahil lang paulit-ulit niyong sinasabi. Diba pwedeng may certain type lang talaga siya? 😂 Kasi if you look at the girls he has openly liked or been linked to, may common denominator naman. Women with substance. Matatalino. Simple pero malakas ang dating. Sexy in their own way.. May sariling identity. May presence. Hindi yung kailangan loud or trying hard para mapansin. Maybe that’s simply his type. Maybe it takes time for him to genuinely develop feelings for a girl because he doesn’t do playtime. Hindi lahat ng lalaki kailangan may roster para mapatunayan ang pagkalalaki. 😂 Bawal ba maging softie ang lalaki? Bawal ba maging selective? Bawal ba yung slow burn instead of collecting women for validation? Because honestly, kadalasan MAS lalaki pa yung mga ganyang tipo kaysa sa mga trying-hard maging playboy just to prove something. There’s nothing weak about a man who knows what he wants, takes his time, protects his heart, and doesn’t give it away just to satisfy expectations. And honestly, mas interesting pa nga yun kaysa pilit nating hanapan ng malisya ang isang lalaki just because he doesn't fit the usual showbiz stereotype.. Kaya tayo binabaha eh. Ang dali nating maniwala sa tsismis. 😂 VOTE WISELY.. KEME😂 #ALDENRICHARDS

little old me

122,673 views • 20 days ago

1/2 🚨TOXIC DDS RED TAGGING QUEEN LORRAINE BADOY TARGETED ME ON SMNI FOR EXPOSING HER LIES. NOW SHE’S SUSPENDED AND I’M VINDICATED. 👏👏👏 [Long read but oddly satisfying 😂] 1. I kept this clip because I knew I’d laugh out loud one day because the universe will prove I was right all along. It is incredibly satisfying to rewatch this clip now. Let’s talk about the SMNI hosts of disinformation: Lorraine Badoy — the unhinged, newly suspended red-tagging queen; and Jeffrey Celiz. 2. But let’s talk about Jeffrey Celiz first. This is the same toxic propagandist from Iloilo City who used to be a lackey for former Iloilo City Mayor Jed Mabilog (now DILG USec) before his name ended up on Duterte’s infamous narco-list as a major drug personality. When the political winds shifted, Jeffrey Celiz miraculously underwent a "rebranding" and crawled out of the woodwork with a fake name, Ka Eric Almendras. He became a self-proclaimed “CPP-NPA cadre" who peddles fake news and red tags everyone. But he is a FAKE CADRE through and through. He left Iloilo because the other personalities in the narco-list got assassinated and he had to re-invent himself to avoid EJK. He even lied in front of Sen. Tito Sotto and Sen. Ping Lacson at the Senate by saying he was a government /PDEA asset. Huh? Kumukuha ang PDEA ng ex NPA Cadre and patay gutom na propagandist as an asset? Huwag mo nga kaming gawing tanga! Everyone in Iloilo knows who you are! Source: 3. Toxic DDS Red Tagging Queen Lorraine Badoy was furious in this video because my 2023 FB post caught her red-handed misquoting the Supreme Court’s resolution in Zarate vs. Aquino. I called her out because she has consistently used this specific case to give herself the fake authority to red-tag anyone. Kaya sya UNHINGED sa red tagging nya because she was quoting an SC ruling to make the DDS brainless minions believe she was doing the right thing. Yun pala, hindi nya binasa ang kaso. And if she did, she obviously didn’t understand the case. 😂 4. BADOY'S OWN FABRICATED DOCTRINE Badoy repeatedly lied on SMNI and claimed the Supreme Court ruled that [falsely] identifying someone as a member of the CPP-NPA-NDF carries "NO DANGER." She literally fabricated her own legal doctrine out of thin air just to justify her actions, and then turned around on-air to whine that I was merely being "too literal." Well, ate girl, a Supreme Court ruling explicitly states what it means. If the SC did not say it, then it doesn’t exist. Imbento ka ng ruling mo? Since you quoted the SC said something that’s literally non-existent, that means you literally spewed fake news and disinformation to put many people’s lives in danger! 5. Badoy and this kapalmuks Jeffrey Celiz even tried to insult me on-air by saying I am not a lawyer. Bakit, lawyers ba kayo? Kung hindi lawyer walang superior comprehension skills sa binabasa? Appeal to authority yarn? Ikaw, Jeffrey Celiz, did you even graduate from WVSU? Patingin nga ng diploma mo! You even falsely claimed you went to and graduated from UP Diliman when you didn’t even pass the UPCAT! Butigon! Palamunin ka lang naman sa Iloilo ng mga pulitiko who relied on your toxic propaganda and wrong grammar statements on the radio, and you were even seen rubbing shoulders with the biggest drug lord, Melvin Odicta. Sadly, he is now dead due to EJK. Di ba that’s the reason umalis ka sa Iloilo dahil takot ka na ikaw ang susunod na ma un-alive? And they can only quote Atty Topacio: a performative DDS lawyer na mahilig sa press conference and doesn’t even have a stellar record of courtroom wins. [Continue reading…]

1/2 🚨TOXIC DDS RED TAGGING QUEEN LORRAINE BADOY TARGETED ME ON SMNI FOR EXPOSING HER LIES. NOW SHE’S SUSPENDED AND I’M VINDICATED. 👏👏👏 [Long read but oddly satisfying 😂] 1. I kept this clip because I knew I’d laugh out loud one day because the universe will prove I was right all along. It is incredibly satisfying to rewatch this clip now. Let’s talk about the SMNI hosts of disinformation: Lorraine Badoy — the unhinged, newly suspended red-tagging queen; and Jeffrey Celiz. 2. But let’s talk about Jeffrey Celiz first. This is the same toxic propagandist from Iloilo City who used to be a lackey for former Iloilo City Mayor Jed Mabilog (now DILG USec) before his name ended up on Duterte’s infamous narco-list as a major drug personality. When the political winds shifted, Jeffrey Celiz miraculously underwent a "rebranding" and crawled out of the woodwork with a fake name, Ka Eric Almendras. He became a self-proclaimed “CPP-NPA cadre" who peddles fake news and red tags everyone. But he is a FAKE CADRE through and through. He left Iloilo because the other personalities in the narco-list got assassinated and he had to re-invent himself to avoid EJK. He even lied in front of Sen. Tito Sotto and Sen. Ping Lacson at the Senate by saying he was a government /PDEA asset. Huh? Kumukuha ang PDEA ng ex NPA Cadre and patay gutom na propagandist as an asset? Huwag mo nga kaming gawing tanga! Everyone in Iloilo knows who you are! Source: 3. Toxic DDS Red Tagging Queen Lorraine Badoy was furious in this video because my 2023 FB post caught her red-handed misquoting the Supreme Court’s resolution in Zarate vs. Aquino. I called her out because she has consistently used this specific case to give herself the fake authority to red-tag anyone. Kaya sya UNHINGED sa red tagging nya because she was quoting an SC ruling to make the DDS brainless minions believe she was doing the right thing. Yun pala, hindi nya binasa ang kaso. And if she did, she obviously didn’t understand the case. 😂 4. BADOY'S OWN FABRICATED DOCTRINE Badoy repeatedly lied on SMNI and claimed the Supreme Court ruled that [falsely] identifying someone as a member of the CPP-NPA-NDF carries "NO DANGER." She literally fabricated her own legal doctrine out of thin air just to justify her actions, and then turned around on-air to whine that I was merely being "too literal." Well, ate girl, a Supreme Court ruling explicitly states what it means. If the SC did not say it, then it doesn’t exist. Imbento ka ng ruling mo? Since you quoted the SC said something that’s literally non-existent, that means you literally spewed fake news and disinformation to put many people’s lives in danger! 5. Badoy and this kapalmuks Jeffrey Celiz even tried to insult me on-air by saying I am not a lawyer. Bakit, lawyers ba kayo? Kung hindi lawyer walang superior comprehension skills sa binabasa? Appeal to authority yarn? Ikaw, Jeffrey Celiz, did you even graduate from WVSU? Patingin nga ng diploma mo! You even falsely claimed you went to and graduated from UP Diliman when you didn’t even pass the UPCAT! Butigon! Palamunin ka lang naman sa Iloilo ng mga pulitiko who relied on your toxic propaganda and wrong grammar statements on the radio, and you were even seen rubbing shoulders with the biggest drug lord, Melvin Odicta. Sadly, he is now dead due to EJK. Di ba that’s the reason umalis ka sa Iloilo dahil takot ka na ikaw ang susunod na ma un-alive? And they can only quote Atty Topacio: a performative DDS lawyer na mahilig sa press conference and doesn’t even have a stellar record of courtroom wins. [Continue reading…]

Thea Tan

36,503 views • 3 months ago

🚨PBBM to the Senators: GET BACK TO WORK! This is what he said in this interview: 1. Get back to work. Get back to work because it's important. Ang dami nating kailangan gawin. We had a meeting sa UPLIFT Committee and marami tayong kailangan pagawa sa mga batas, mga batas na we were thinking na baka magka-supplemental budget, baka magka- amendahan namin ang mga ibang batas. Ito ay kailangan para makapagbigay tayo ng tulong sa taong bayan dahil nga sa oil crisis. Kung walang session, hindi ko nga maintindihan eh dahil ang pagkakaintindi ko is that ang rules — nag-congressman naman ako, nag-senador din naman ako. Ang rules diyan bago ka mag-cancel ng session, you have to inform the other house three days before you cancel a session and there has to be a very good reason for canceling a session. 2. I don't think na ihahatid mo ang isang senador para pumunta kung saan siya pupunta, hindi yata sapat na dahilan para i-cancel ang isang session. Isang session lang 'yun. Ngayon, kanselado na naman ang isang session. Hindi ko nga maintindihan kung papaano sila magtatrabaho kung ganito. Ang House of Representatives ngayon ay nagtataka kung papaano ba, nagbago na ba ‘yung rules, nagbago na ba 'yung mga patakaran natin kagaya ng mga nakaraan? It is a rule that is contained in the Constitution. 3. I'm afraid all these events that we have been witnessing has thrown the Senate and its leadership, the whole Senate, into disarray. It has discredited the leadership and it has stopped the essential business of legislation in government. The two other departments continue to work. The Executive continues to work. The Judiciary continues to work. Why does the Legislature decide to stop working? I don't understand that. I talked to my fellow senators at the time I was senator and we cannot figure out bakit magkakaganto, anong nangyari, paano tayo napunta rito. 4. The best description I can have is that the Legislature is now in disarray. But that is exactly the opposite from what we are trying to achieve. We are trying to achieve some form of stability so that people can get on with their lives, so that people can plan ahead for their future, so that people can count on the assistance of government during this time of an emergency. And we cannot do that if the Legislature decides to stay at home and have a vacation. That is anathema to everything that governance is about. 5. I never imagined in my entire life, in my entire political life, that such a thing could happen, especially to the august — it's no longer august now — to the august body of the upper house, the Senate of the Philippines. ###

🚨PBBM to the Senators: GET BACK TO WORK! This is what he said in this interview: 1. Get back to work. Get back to work because it's important. Ang dami nating kailangan gawin. We had a meeting sa UPLIFT Committee and marami tayong kailangan pagawa sa mga batas, mga batas na we were thinking na baka magka-supplemental budget, baka magka- amendahan namin ang mga ibang batas. Ito ay kailangan para makapagbigay tayo ng tulong sa taong bayan dahil nga sa oil crisis. Kung walang session, hindi ko nga maintindihan eh dahil ang pagkakaintindi ko is that ang rules — nag-congressman naman ako, nag-senador din naman ako. Ang rules diyan bago ka mag-cancel ng session, you have to inform the other house three days before you cancel a session and there has to be a very good reason for canceling a session. 2. I don't think na ihahatid mo ang isang senador para pumunta kung saan siya pupunta, hindi yata sapat na dahilan para i-cancel ang isang session. Isang session lang 'yun. Ngayon, kanselado na naman ang isang session. Hindi ko nga maintindihan kung papaano sila magtatrabaho kung ganito. Ang House of Representatives ngayon ay nagtataka kung papaano ba, nagbago na ba ‘yung rules, nagbago na ba 'yung mga patakaran natin kagaya ng mga nakaraan? It is a rule that is contained in the Constitution. 3. I'm afraid all these events that we have been witnessing has thrown the Senate and its leadership, the whole Senate, into disarray. It has discredited the leadership and it has stopped the essential business of legislation in government. The two other departments continue to work. The Executive continues to work. The Judiciary continues to work. Why does the Legislature decide to stop working? I don't understand that. I talked to my fellow senators at the time I was senator and we cannot figure out bakit magkakaganto, anong nangyari, paano tayo napunta rito. 4. The best description I can have is that the Legislature is now in disarray. But that is exactly the opposite from what we are trying to achieve. We are trying to achieve some form of stability so that people can get on with their lives, so that people can plan ahead for their future, so that people can count on the assistance of government during this time of an emergency. And we cannot do that if the Legislature decides to stay at home and have a vacation. That is anathema to everything that governance is about. 5. I never imagined in my entire life, in my entire political life, that such a thing could happen, especially to the august — it's no longer august now — to the august body of the upper house, the Senate of the Philippines. ###

Thea Tan

13,262 views • 3 months ago

My honest review of Buruguduy The Musical Nung una, akala ko parang mababaw na patawa lang. Medyo nakornihan pa nga ako nung simula eh. Naisip ko "ang labo naman nito...patawa lang sila ng patawa" (buti nalang nakakatawa talaga sila✌🏼😅) Siguro I was trying to look for something deeper, and was hoping that things would soon make sense...or at least magkaroong ng satisfying amount of substance in their world of absurdity (naks...world of absurdity) Sure, it was fun and funny...and how the songs were used (and how the actors performed them), were amazing, and the visual assault was spectacular. Given na yun eh. ...but I kept asking myself, yun na ba talaga yun? Isang nakakatawang trip na may simpleng closure sa dulo? Then looking back, I soon realized how dark and simple the narrative was. Para akong binuhusan ng isang timba ng malamig na tubig. It was brilliant. Like a deep disturbing track disguised as a novelty song. Every single line and element pala were symbols and clues on what the story was all about...even the stupidest little things. Everything about it was precise and calculated. Lahat sinadya. Sobrang galing nung writer. Sobrang galing nila lahat. Napaka-fearless and unapologetic. Parang "kung di mo napansin yung serious side, oks lang...at least natawa at natuwa ka...and yun naman ang importante" 😁👍🏼 Kung na-gets mo naman, parang "p*tang ina...yun pala yun. Mga sira-ulo sila" 🤟🏼😳 sobrang in your face pala yung kwento. Sobrang dark and twisted, pero may subtle, at simple, and beautiful na silver lining.❤️ May seryosong matututunan, at makatotohanan na inspirasyon...na binalot sa isang makulit at magical na mundo. Basta...sobrang galing. ...and sobrang saya lang. Isang feel good na musical (na may dark twist all throughout) at siguradong lalabas kang naka-ngiti.❤️ Excited na ako manood ulit bukas...pero this time, I'll be looking out for more clues, hints, and easter eggs. ...or maybe, I'll just sit back, and simply enjoy the ride, without thinking too much. Cheers!!! P.S. sa mga magtatanong, hindi po ako nagbebenta ng tickets✌🏼😅 kung gusto nyo ng tickets try nyo tawagan si Pie +639178728765

My honest review of Buruguduy The Musical Nung una, akala ko parang mababaw na patawa lang. Medyo nakornihan pa nga ako nung simula eh. Naisip ko "ang labo naman nito...patawa lang sila ng patawa" (buti nalang nakakatawa talaga sila✌🏼😅) Siguro I was trying to look for something deeper, and was hoping that things would soon make sense...or at least magkaroong ng satisfying amount of substance in their world of absurdity (naks...world of absurdity) Sure, it was fun and funny...and how the songs were used (and how the actors performed them), were amazing, and the visual assault was spectacular. Given na yun eh. ...but I kept asking myself, yun na ba talaga yun? Isang nakakatawang trip na may simpleng closure sa dulo? Then looking back, I soon realized how dark and simple the narrative was. Para akong binuhusan ng isang timba ng malamig na tubig. It was brilliant. Like a deep disturbing track disguised as a novelty song. Every single line and element pala were symbols and clues on what the story was all about...even the stupidest little things. Everything about it was precise and calculated. Lahat sinadya. Sobrang galing nung writer. Sobrang galing nila lahat. Napaka-fearless and unapologetic. Parang "kung di mo napansin yung serious side, oks lang...at least natawa at natuwa ka...and yun naman ang importante" 😁👍🏼 Kung na-gets mo naman, parang "p*tang ina...yun pala yun. Mga sira-ulo sila" 🤟🏼😳 sobrang in your face pala yung kwento. Sobrang dark and twisted, pero may subtle, at simple, and beautiful na silver lining.❤️ May seryosong matututunan, at makatotohanan na inspirasyon...na binalot sa isang makulit at magical na mundo. Basta...sobrang galing. ...and sobrang saya lang. Isang feel good na musical (na may dark twist all throughout) at siguradong lalabas kang naka-ngiti.❤️ Excited na ako manood ulit bukas...pero this time, I'll be looking out for more clues, hints, and easter eggs. ...or maybe, I'll just sit back, and simply enjoy the ride, without thinking too much. Cheers!!! P.S. sa mga magtatanong, hindi po ako nagbebenta ng tickets✌🏼😅 kung gusto nyo ng tickets try nyo tawagan si Pie +639178728765

Chito Miranda

21,140 views • 2 years ago

Just days after Claire Castro inaccurately and maliciously took Franco Cruz Mabanta's apology to the First Family out of context to allegedly help the narrative of nationally shamed former Martin Romualdez, the Presidential Spokesperson found herself on the receiving end of the verbal wrath of honorahle and patriotic Filipino protesters on the streets of Vancouver, Canada. The protesters did not hold back—directly calling her a liar, among a flurry of pejoratives. At a press conference this week, Castro deliberately spun a question from a reporter to make it look like Mabanta was spreading fake news about the First Family. However, PGMN has never once spread fake news about anyone. Moreover, although the PGMN Anchors are allowed to say whatever they want themselves, PGMN as a company itself has long made the strategic editorial decision to never attack President Bongbong Marcos, Vice President Sara Duterte, or Mayor Leni Robredo—a decision further concretized after Romualdez framed Mabanta in a fake extortion plot prompting PGMN to declare war exclusively against one enemy: Romualdez. This week at a Malacañang press conference, Castro was asked this question by a reporter: "Last week PGMN founder Franco mabanta posted a lengthy video. He apologized to the President and the First Lady for the past criticisms na ibinato ng PGMN against them and kasama rin din po doon yung kanyang paratang that Former Speaker Martin romualdez orchestrated the rift between the president and the vice president and also betrayed many of his political allies, including president Marcos. Your take on this?" Claire Castro responded: "Ang paghingi ng paumanhin ay pag amin ng kamalian. Ang pag amin ng kamalian papaano nila masasabi sa tao na totoo ang kanilang kwento taong aral dito. Wag gumawa ng intriga lalo na kung walang basehan. Ang pag iingay ng walang saysay ay nagiging biktima lamang ang mga Pilipino na walang malay. At ang paninira na walang basehan ginagawa lang na mangmang ang ating mga kababayan so iwasan ang mang intriga kung gagawa kayo ng anumang pag iimbestiga siguraduhin lamang ninyo na kayo ay may mga ebidensya. Hindi kailangan daanin sa pamilya. Hindi kailangan daanin kung saan saan kung mayroon kayong ebidensya, sampahan niyo na agad ng kaso." This entire answer from Castro was completely taken out of context. And was obviously perverse in intent. Mabanta did not apologize for criticism that never happened. Mabanta was apologizing for "feelings that had been hurt in the past", when he worked for the then-future First Couple back in 2017-18. A gesture that Mabanta felt was both "necessary" and "sincere" after having parted ways eight years prior. Instead of addressing the gesture truthfully, Castro twisted the message to supply ammunition for the hideously dishonest Romualdez camp, trying to make it look like Mabanta and PGMN's comprehensively accurate exposés against the former Speaker were fabricated. Planting loaded questions via corrupt reporters to be answered in a corrupt way by corrupt spokespersons while coordinating with corrupt media outlets to subsequently report a lie is a common practice in politics for governments around the world. Often this scheme is planned in the dark, without the knowledge of the principal.

Just days after Claire Castro inaccurately and maliciously took Franco Cruz Mabanta's apology to the First Family out of context to allegedly help the narrative of nationally shamed former Martin Romualdez, the Presidential Spokesperson found herself on the receiving end of the verbal wrath of honorahle and patriotic Filipino protesters on the streets of Vancouver, Canada. The protesters did not hold back—directly calling her a liar, among a flurry of pejoratives. At a press conference this week, Castro deliberately spun a question from a reporter to make it look like Mabanta was spreading fake news about the First Family. However, PGMN has never once spread fake news about anyone. Moreover, although the PGMN Anchors are allowed to say whatever they want themselves, PGMN as a company itself has long made the strategic editorial decision to never attack President Bongbong Marcos, Vice President Sara Duterte, or Mayor Leni Robredo—a decision further concretized after Romualdez framed Mabanta in a fake extortion plot prompting PGMN to declare war exclusively against one enemy: Romualdez. This week at a Malacañang press conference, Castro was asked this question by a reporter: "Last week PGMN founder Franco mabanta posted a lengthy video. He apologized to the President and the First Lady for the past criticisms na ibinato ng PGMN against them and kasama rin din po doon yung kanyang paratang that Former Speaker Martin romualdez orchestrated the rift between the president and the vice president and also betrayed many of his political allies, including president Marcos. Your take on this?" Claire Castro responded: "Ang paghingi ng paumanhin ay pag amin ng kamalian. Ang pag amin ng kamalian papaano nila masasabi sa tao na totoo ang kanilang kwento taong aral dito. Wag gumawa ng intriga lalo na kung walang basehan. Ang pag iingay ng walang saysay ay nagiging biktima lamang ang mga Pilipino na walang malay. At ang paninira na walang basehan ginagawa lang na mangmang ang ating mga kababayan so iwasan ang mang intriga kung gagawa kayo ng anumang pag iimbestiga siguraduhin lamang ninyo na kayo ay may mga ebidensya. Hindi kailangan daanin sa pamilya. Hindi kailangan daanin kung saan saan kung mayroon kayong ebidensya, sampahan niyo na agad ng kaso." This entire answer from Castro was completely taken out of context. And was obviously perverse in intent. Mabanta did not apologize for criticism that never happened. Mabanta was apologizing for "feelings that had been hurt in the past", when he worked for the then-future First Couple back in 2017-18. A gesture that Mabanta felt was both "necessary" and "sincere" after having parted ways eight years prior. Instead of addressing the gesture truthfully, Castro twisted the message to supply ammunition for the hideously dishonest Romualdez camp, trying to make it look like Mabanta and PGMN's comprehensively accurate exposés against the former Speaker were fabricated. Planting loaded questions via corrupt reporters to be answered in a corrupt way by corrupt spokespersons while coordinating with corrupt media outlets to subsequently report a lie is a common practice in politics for governments around the world. Often this scheme is planned in the dark, without the knowledge of the principal.

Peanut Gallery Media Network

20,981 views • 2 months ago

🚨 Rep. LUISTRO DARES TO ASK THE UNASKABLE🚨 Congresswoman Gerville “Jinky Bitrics” Luistro, unshaken and fearless, confronts former President Duterte in a gripping interpellation, seeking clarity and accountability for the war on drugs and its chilling legacy. Emphasizing his promise to take full legal responsibility, Luistro probes: What happened to the bodies buried in Laud Quarry? To the victims of the Davao Death Squad? To the lives lost in the 2004 Dumoy raid? Former President Duterte fires back, asking, "Where is your proof?" Luistro responds: "Mr. President, I’m anchoring my questions about these separate incidents from your initial statement—that you are taking full legal responsibility for all the victims of the war on drugs, both legal and illegal. You are a long-time prosecutor, and of course, it is fundamental among us all lawyers to uphold the requirements of due process." Duterte counters with: "We are zeroing in on a particular individual now." Luistro powerfully reminds: "Mr. President, due process is the law that hears before it condemns. Due process is the law that requires notice and hearing." The former president’s short rebuttal, "If you say so," leaves the air thick with tension. Luistro quips back with another gripping reminder: "Mister President, I hope that we will be reminded that by due process, THE END DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE MEANS." Congresswoman Luistro proceeds to present statistics on the war on drugs: - 6,252 individuals killed in police anti-drug operations as of May 2022. - 27,000 to 30,000 individuals killed, including vigilante-style executions. - 427 activists, human rights defenders, and grassroots leaders killed as of December 2021. - 166 land and environmental defenders killed as of December 2020. - 23 journalists and media workers killed as of April 2022. - 66 judges, lawyers, and prosecutors killed as of December 2021. - 28 mayors and vice mayors killed as of December 2021. Cong. Luistro then delivers the crucial question: "Mr. President, my question is: When you implemented the war on drugs, did you strictly comply with the requirements of due process?" With a firm and unwavering tone, former President Duterte responds, "YES." She continues, pointing out: "It is my humble submission that, contrary to the answer of the former president, I humbly believe that the war on drugs never complied with the requirements of due process. The statistics show the huge number of victims of the war on drugs. If my memory serves me right, during the Aquino administration, there were around 200 victims, and during the present administration, there are around 200 victims as well. Given these statistics, there are almost or around 31,000 victims. If indeed they followed the requirements of due process, there should not have been this many deaths. Instead, there should have been many cases pending in court. I hope that all of us are reminded by the fundamental law that no person should be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. It is the humble submission of this representation that the Quad Comm is ready to make a recommendation for the filing of the necessary actions in court for violations of RA 9851—an act defining and penalizing crimes against international humanitarian law—or, at the very least, for murder cases as defined under the Revised Penal Code." The Interpellation Intensifies To conclude her interpellation, she delivers a series of no-holds-barred questions: Luistro: "Mr. President, three Chinese drug lords were killed at the Davao Penal Colony. Are you willing to take accountability and responsibility for this?" Duterte: "Wala ako sa Davao, nandito na ako sa Manila." Luistro: "Are you saying no?" Duterte: "If gusto mong isali yan, idagdag mo, ok lang." Luistro: "How about the death of General (Ret.) Barayuga? Are you willing to take full legal responsibility for this?" Duterte: "No, I do not kill generals." Luistro: "The death of Mayor Parojinog and the 15 others in Ozamiz City. Are you taking full responsibility for this?" Duterte: "Hindi ako nagpapatay ng mga mayor, ma’am." Luistro: "The death of Mayor Espinosa of Albuera, Leyte. Are you taking full responsibility for this?" Duterte: "That is my birthplace." Luistro: "The death of Mayor Toni Halili of Tanauan City?" Duterte: "Malayo yan sa akin, ma’am." Luistro: "The death of Mayor Perez of Los Baños?" Duterte: "Lalo na." A Riveting Ending Luistro fires back: "If you are denying all these, alin po yung tinutukoy niyo when you said you are taking full responsibility for all the victims of the war on drugs, both legal and illegal?" The former president mumbles in response: "Yes, kasi order ko kasi yung, that is my campaign against drugs. Alam mo maraming estasyon, maraming police. Kung nagkaleche-leche doon, hindi ako maghuhugas ng kamay. Of course, nagkamali sila. If there is an appropriate action na gusto niyong ilabas, then file a case in court. I’m challenging anybody or everybody who makes the accusation, whether it is really true or not—maybe true—file the case in court, because may korte tayo. Even if I admit na totoo yan, because I will make the admission there again." Luistro counters: "Are you saying, Mr. President, when you go to court, you are willing to admit accountability for all the deaths during the war on drugs?" Duterte replies: "Of course, may abogado ako, ma’am. Kung ano ang sasabihin ng abogado ko, susunod ako." Luistro presses further: "I hope that everything you said before the Quad can be reduced in writing so that truly we can believe that you are taking full legal responsibility for all the victims of the war on drugs, both legal and illegal. Because as lawyers, we believe that by extrajudicial confession, we have to put that in writing, Mr. President." Duterte responds: "...It’s a policy of government or the president. Hindi ako maghuhugas ng kamay..." The Final Question Luistro asks: "If one of these days the ICC will come, will you voluntarily submit yourself?" Duterte retorts: "Sipain ko pa sila, ma’am." Luistro reminds him: "But you said a while ago, that if somebody will sponsor your fare to the ICC, you will voluntarily submit yourself to their investigation and jurisdiction." Duterte replies: "Yes, pero kung sila pumunta dito, sipain ko." Luistro clarifies: "But will you confirm that you are willing to voluntarily submit yourself to the ICC?" Duterte firmly states: "Oo, punta ako doon, sipain ko din sila." A Gripping Conclusion Luistro ends her interpellation with grace and precision: "I have nothing further. Thank you, Mr. President." In this powerful exchange, Congresswoman Luistro demonstrates fearless leadership and unwavering commitment to truth and accountability, leaving no question unanswered in her pursuit of justice. #LargaLuistro2025

🚨 Rep. LUISTRO DARES TO ASK THE UNASKABLE🚨 Congresswoman Gerville “Jinky Bitrics” Luistro, unshaken and fearless, confronts former President Duterte in a gripping interpellation, seeking clarity and accountability for the war on drugs and its chilling legacy. Emphasizing his promise to take full legal responsibility, Luistro probes: What happened to the bodies buried in Laud Quarry? To the victims of the Davao Death Squad? To the lives lost in the 2004 Dumoy raid? Former President Duterte fires back, asking, "Where is your proof?" Luistro responds: "Mr. President, I’m anchoring my questions about these separate incidents from your initial statement—that you are taking full legal responsibility for all the victims of the war on drugs, both legal and illegal. You are a long-time prosecutor, and of course, it is fundamental among us all lawyers to uphold the requirements of due process." Duterte counters with: "We are zeroing in on a particular individual now." Luistro powerfully reminds: "Mr. President, due process is the law that hears before it condemns. Due process is the law that requires notice and hearing." The former president’s short rebuttal, "If you say so," leaves the air thick with tension. Luistro quips back with another gripping reminder: "Mister President, I hope that we will be reminded that by due process, THE END DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE MEANS." Congresswoman Luistro proceeds to present statistics on the war on drugs: - 6,252 individuals killed in police anti-drug operations as of May 2022. - 27,000 to 30,000 individuals killed, including vigilante-style executions. - 427 activists, human rights defenders, and grassroots leaders killed as of December 2021. - 166 land and environmental defenders killed as of December 2020. - 23 journalists and media workers killed as of April 2022. - 66 judges, lawyers, and prosecutors killed as of December 2021. - 28 mayors and vice mayors killed as of December 2021. Cong. Luistro then delivers the crucial question: "Mr. President, my question is: When you implemented the war on drugs, did you strictly comply with the requirements of due process?" With a firm and unwavering tone, former President Duterte responds, "YES." She continues, pointing out: "It is my humble submission that, contrary to the answer of the former president, I humbly believe that the war on drugs never complied with the requirements of due process. The statistics show the huge number of victims of the war on drugs. If my memory serves me right, during the Aquino administration, there were around 200 victims, and during the present administration, there are around 200 victims as well. Given these statistics, there are almost or around 31,000 victims. If indeed they followed the requirements of due process, there should not have been this many deaths. Instead, there should have been many cases pending in court. I hope that all of us are reminded by the fundamental law that no person should be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. It is the humble submission of this representation that the Quad Comm is ready to make a recommendation for the filing of the necessary actions in court for violations of RA 9851—an act defining and penalizing crimes against international humanitarian law—or, at the very least, for murder cases as defined under the Revised Penal Code." The Interpellation Intensifies To conclude her interpellation, she delivers a series of no-holds-barred questions: Luistro: "Mr. President, three Chinese drug lords were killed at the Davao Penal Colony. Are you willing to take accountability and responsibility for this?" Duterte: "Wala ako sa Davao, nandito na ako sa Manila." Luistro: "Are you saying no?" Duterte: "If gusto mong isali yan, idagdag mo, ok lang." Luistro: "How about the death of General (Ret.) Barayuga? Are you willing to take full legal responsibility for this?" Duterte: "No, I do not kill generals." Luistro: "The death of Mayor Parojinog and the 15 others in Ozamiz City. Are you taking full responsibility for this?" Duterte: "Hindi ako nagpapatay ng mga mayor, ma’am." Luistro: "The death of Mayor Espinosa of Albuera, Leyte. Are you taking full responsibility for this?" Duterte: "That is my birthplace." Luistro: "The death of Mayor Toni Halili of Tanauan City?" Duterte: "Malayo yan sa akin, ma’am." Luistro: "The death of Mayor Perez of Los Baños?" Duterte: "Lalo na." A Riveting Ending Luistro fires back: "If you are denying all these, alin po yung tinutukoy niyo when you said you are taking full responsibility for all the victims of the war on drugs, both legal and illegal?" The former president mumbles in response: "Yes, kasi order ko kasi yung, that is my campaign against drugs. Alam mo maraming estasyon, maraming police. Kung nagkaleche-leche doon, hindi ako maghuhugas ng kamay. Of course, nagkamali sila. If there is an appropriate action na gusto niyong ilabas, then file a case in court. I’m challenging anybody or everybody who makes the accusation, whether it is really true or not—maybe true—file the case in court, because may korte tayo. Even if I admit na totoo yan, because I will make the admission there again." Luistro counters: "Are you saying, Mr. President, when you go to court, you are willing to admit accountability for all the deaths during the war on drugs?" Duterte replies: "Of course, may abogado ako, ma’am. Kung ano ang sasabihin ng abogado ko, susunod ako." Luistro presses further: "I hope that everything you said before the Quad can be reduced in writing so that truly we can believe that you are taking full legal responsibility for all the victims of the war on drugs, both legal and illegal. Because as lawyers, we believe that by extrajudicial confession, we have to put that in writing, Mr. President." Duterte responds: "...It’s a policy of government or the president. Hindi ako maghuhugas ng kamay..." The Final Question Luistro asks: "If one of these days the ICC will come, will you voluntarily submit yourself?" Duterte retorts: "Sipain ko pa sila, ma’am." Luistro reminds him: "But you said a while ago, that if somebody will sponsor your fare to the ICC, you will voluntarily submit yourself to their investigation and jurisdiction." Duterte replies: "Yes, pero kung sila pumunta dito, sipain ko." Luistro clarifies: "But will you confirm that you are willing to voluntarily submit yourself to the ICC?" Duterte firmly states: "Oo, punta ako doon, sipain ko din sila." A Gripping Conclusion Luistro ends her interpellation with grace and precision: "I have nothing further. Thank you, Mr. President." In this powerful exchange, Congresswoman Luistro demonstrates fearless leadership and unwavering commitment to truth and accountability, leaving no question unanswered in her pursuit of justice. #LargaLuistro2025

Informed PH

258,158 views • 1 year ago

We are officially entering the endgame of the Sara Duterte impeachment trial, and the political landscape is shifting fast. With the trial rapidly accelerating, Senator-judge Erwin Tulfo did exactly what political commentators and legal scholars have been whispering about for months. He stood up and challenged the absurd math behind the final voting threshold. Tulfo is asking the only question that matters: Why should the baseline for a 2/3 conviction stay at a rigid 24 when a massive chunk of the Senate is physically incapable of voting? Do they count as members of the Senate if they can't vote? Look at the Senate roster right now. Four senators are completely out of commission and won't be counted for the vote: - Sen. Loren Legarda is out on extended medical leave abroad (which keeps on being extended because she must love French medicine soooo much and absolutely isn't hiding from plunder charges against her, no no. 🤡). - Sen. Dela Rosa is literally in hiding from an active ICC arrest warrant for crimes against humanity. 🐷 - Sen. Estrada and Rodante Marcoleta are both currently sitting in jail facing plunder charges. 👮 If they can't be counted for a vote then how can they be counted as part of the denominator for the vote? Holding the baseline at 24 means you need a hard 16 votes to convict. But if 4 senators are gone, you only have 20 senator-judges left in the room. If 15 of them vote to convict, that is an overwhelming 75 percent majority of active judges. Yet, under the old rules, Duterte would walk free simply because the math is being padded by fugitives, detainees, and sick leave. That isn't a constitutional guardrail. It is an institutional escape hatch for the Dutertes. What if a bomb goes off in the Senate that kills a few senators or people get sick during the day of the vote? Are we still stuck at 16 votes? Sen. Escudero didn't just brush this off but punted the issue to September 16, when retired Supreme Court justices and legal experts will come in as amici curiae, followed by a final Senate vote on the math question on September 23. They are expected to support lowering the threshold. Sen. Erwin Tulfo cited the landmark 1949 Supreme Court case Avelino v. Cuenco to support his push to lower the voting baseline. In that historic ruling, the Supreme Court famously held that an absolute majority of "all the members of the Senate" could be computed based on the number of senators within the coercive jurisdiction of the body, meaning those who are actually available, present, and capable of participating, rather than the total constitutional seats. Tulfo and others argue that senators who are completely outside the Senate's operational reach (such as fugitives or those in detention) should be excluded from the denominator when calculating the crucial two-thirds threshold for conviction or acquittal. I hear from political circles here that the administration is confident the Supreme Court will side with this interpretation and the prosecution is confident they have the numbers to convict even if the number stays fixed at 16. This explains why the prosecution is sprinting through the finish line with this impeachment trial. They dropped their remaining witnesses under Article I of the Articles of Impeachment (misuse, misappropriation, and irregular liquidation of P12.5 million in confidential funds by Duterte). They know they’ve already buried the defense under a mountain of damning PSA evidence. When you’ve already proven the OVP was paying out intelligence funds to dead infants from 1965, you don't really need a closing act. Video Source: ABS-CBN News Channel

We are officially entering the endgame of the Sara Duterte impeachment trial, and the political landscape is shifting fast. With the trial rapidly accelerating, Senator-judge Erwin Tulfo did exactly what political commentators and legal scholars have been whispering about for months. He stood up and challenged the absurd math behind the final voting threshold. Tulfo is asking the only question that matters: Why should the baseline for a 2/3 conviction stay at a rigid 24 when a massive chunk of the Senate is physically incapable of voting? Do they count as members of the Senate if they can't vote? Look at the Senate roster right now. Four senators are completely out of commission and won't be counted for the vote: - Sen. Loren Legarda is out on extended medical leave abroad (which keeps on being extended because she must love French medicine soooo much and absolutely isn't hiding from plunder charges against her, no no. 🤡). - Sen. Dela Rosa is literally in hiding from an active ICC arrest warrant for crimes against humanity. 🐷 - Sen. Estrada and Rodante Marcoleta are both currently sitting in jail facing plunder charges. 👮 If they can't be counted for a vote then how can they be counted as part of the denominator for the vote? Holding the baseline at 24 means you need a hard 16 votes to convict. But if 4 senators are gone, you only have 20 senator-judges left in the room. If 15 of them vote to convict, that is an overwhelming 75 percent majority of active judges. Yet, under the old rules, Duterte would walk free simply because the math is being padded by fugitives, detainees, and sick leave. That isn't a constitutional guardrail. It is an institutional escape hatch for the Dutertes. What if a bomb goes off in the Senate that kills a few senators or people get sick during the day of the vote? Are we still stuck at 16 votes? Sen. Escudero didn't just brush this off but punted the issue to September 16, when retired Supreme Court justices and legal experts will come in as amici curiae, followed by a final Senate vote on the math question on September 23. They are expected to support lowering the threshold. Sen. Erwin Tulfo cited the landmark 1949 Supreme Court case Avelino v. Cuenco to support his push to lower the voting baseline. In that historic ruling, the Supreme Court famously held that an absolute majority of "all the members of the Senate" could be computed based on the number of senators within the coercive jurisdiction of the body, meaning those who are actually available, present, and capable of participating, rather than the total constitutional seats. Tulfo and others argue that senators who are completely outside the Senate's operational reach (such as fugitives or those in detention) should be excluded from the denominator when calculating the crucial two-thirds threshold for conviction or acquittal. I hear from political circles here that the administration is confident the Supreme Court will side with this interpretation and the prosecution is confident they have the numbers to convict even if the number stays fixed at 16. This explains why the prosecution is sprinting through the finish line with this impeachment trial. They dropped their remaining witnesses under Article I of the Articles of Impeachment (misuse, misappropriation, and irregular liquidation of P12.5 million in confidential funds by Duterte). They know they’ve already buried the defense under a mountain of damning PSA evidence. When you’ve already proven the OVP was paying out intelligence funds to dead infants from 1965, you don't really need a closing act. Video Source: ABS-CBN News Channel

Ivan 🇵🇭🇻🇦

210,279 views • 17 days ago

BASTA BREADWINNER NA ATE, SELFLESS 🥹❤️ Looking back on her journey as the family’s breadwinner, Jeri Mae Tizon revisited one of the most fulfilling moments of supporting her younger brother. In a TikTok post, Tizon shared the touching surprise she prepared for her youngest brother: a second-hand cellphone she bought for him during the COVID-19 pandemic. “Grabe si Lord 🥹 kaka-umpisa ko lang halos mag VA dito, kaya mababa lang ang sahod plus pandemic pa at nahiwalay ako sa kanila ng ilang months… ‘Di ko alam pa’no ko naitawid ‘yon pero grabe, grabe si Lord kumilos. 🥹😭 Ang layo na, sobrang layo na,” she wrote in the caption. Tizon, 27, is the eldest of three siblings. She shared that she took on the responsibility of looking after her siblings after their parents separated, while their father rarely came home due to work. In 2019, she began working as a virtual assistant (VA). From then on, she took charge of their household bills, her siblings’ school allowances, and their daily expenses. During the height of the pandemic, she had to rent an apartment, and communication with her siblings came through their middle brother, AJ, who would visit her apartment to get money for household needs. He would also bring handwritten notes from their youngest sibling, Alecxis—sometimes along with mangoes picked from a tree at home. According to Tizon, one of the letters wrote, “Ate, naghuhugas ako palagi ng plato. Ate, may mangga, kay Kuya ako kumuha niyan (siya ang umakyat sa puno). Ate, nawala cellphone ko, sana mabilihan mo ako.” However, she would often tell AJ to inform Alecxis that she did not have enough money because she was paying rent. At the time, almost nothing was left from her salary after covering all their expenses. One day, she saw a photo of her youngest brother just watching their cousins play a mobile game. Tizon said that seeing her brother on the sidelines broke her heart, which pushed her to save money and eventually buy a second-hand cellphone for him. When the surprise finally came in June 2020, Tizon said the moment brought both of them to tears. For her, it was a deeply fulfilling moment, as she felt the genuine happiness of her younger brother. Looking back, Tizon admits those months were among the hardest moments of her life. Her income was limited, rent consumed most of it, and the pressure of supporting her siblings weighed heavily on her. Yet somehow, she endured. Today, Tizon shared that she continues to work as a VA, and their financial situation has significantly improved over the years. (Video courtesy Jeri Mae Tizon) If you have a story, picture, or video you wish to share, you may join our community page:

BASTA BREADWINNER NA ATE, SELFLESS 🥹❤️ Looking back on her journey as the family’s breadwinner, Jeri Mae Tizon revisited one of the most fulfilling moments of supporting her younger brother. In a TikTok post, Tizon shared the touching surprise she prepared for her youngest brother: a second-hand cellphone she bought for him during the COVID-19 pandemic. “Grabe si Lord 🥹 kaka-umpisa ko lang halos mag VA dito, kaya mababa lang ang sahod plus pandemic pa at nahiwalay ako sa kanila ng ilang months… ‘Di ko alam pa’no ko naitawid ‘yon pero grabe, grabe si Lord kumilos. 🥹😭 Ang layo na, sobrang layo na,” she wrote in the caption. Tizon, 27, is the eldest of three siblings. She shared that she took on the responsibility of looking after her siblings after their parents separated, while their father rarely came home due to work. In 2019, she began working as a virtual assistant (VA). From then on, she took charge of their household bills, her siblings’ school allowances, and their daily expenses. During the height of the pandemic, she had to rent an apartment, and communication with her siblings came through their middle brother, AJ, who would visit her apartment to get money for household needs. He would also bring handwritten notes from their youngest sibling, Alecxis—sometimes along with mangoes picked from a tree at home. According to Tizon, one of the letters wrote, “Ate, naghuhugas ako palagi ng plato. Ate, may mangga, kay Kuya ako kumuha niyan (siya ang umakyat sa puno). Ate, nawala cellphone ko, sana mabilihan mo ako.” However, she would often tell AJ to inform Alecxis that she did not have enough money because she was paying rent. At the time, almost nothing was left from her salary after covering all their expenses. One day, she saw a photo of her youngest brother just watching their cousins play a mobile game. Tizon said that seeing her brother on the sidelines broke her heart, which pushed her to save money and eventually buy a second-hand cellphone for him. When the surprise finally came in June 2020, Tizon said the moment brought both of them to tears. For her, it was a deeply fulfilling moment, as she felt the genuine happiness of her younger brother. Looking back, Tizon admits those months were among the hardest moments of her life. Her income was limited, rent consumed most of it, and the pressure of supporting her siblings weighed heavily on her. Yet somehow, she endured. Today, Tizon shared that she continues to work as a VA, and their financial situation has significantly improved over the years. (Video courtesy Jeri Mae Tizon) If you have a story, picture, or video you wish to share, you may join our community page:

The Philippine Star

190,017 views • 6 months ago

ST. JOEL VILLANUEVA IN HIS FULL BLOWN ACTOR ERA. A-MUST READ PO! “THE PASTOR, THE PORK, AND THE PENDING QUO WARRANTO: The Joel Villanueva Paradox” By: Tindig Pilipino/FB “I don’t intend to run anymore in public office.” Sabi ni Senator Joel Villanueva - parang isang confession na may halong pagod, guilt, at political survival instinct. Pero kung pakikinggan mo ang mga bulungan sa likod ng Senado, hindi raw ito voluntary exit - kundi strategic retreat bago pa siya mapatalsik. Ayon kay Nosy Tarsee, there’s talk of a quo warranto petition brewing - the same legal weapon na ginamit para patalsikin si Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno noong 2018. ⸻ ⚖️ The Ghost of 2016 Let’s rewind. In 2016, Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales ordered Joel Villanueva’s dismissal and perpetual disqualification from public office for misusing ₱10 million in PDAF funds intended for livelihood projects. The findings were damning - fake NGOs, ghost beneficiaries, and forged documents. The Ombudsman even forwarded the case to the Sandiganbayan, where malversation and falsification charges were filed - and to this day, no final resolution has been rendered. In short: the case is still pending, but the disqualification order still stands. ⸻ 🧾 The Senate’s Selective Blindness The Ombudsman’s decision was clear - dismissal and perpetual disqualification. Pero the Senate refused to enforce it, claiming “separation of powers.” In Tagalog: “Bahala na kami sa sarili naming dumi.” That move practically neutered the Ombudsman’s authority. Even Morales herself, in later interviews, said it made the country look like a joke in the eyes of the world - because the rule of law seemed optional for the powerful. ⸻ 🌊 Then Came the Flood (Control Scam) Fast forward to 2025 - DPWH District Engineer Henry Alcantara dropped his own bombshell before the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee. He named Villanueva among those who allegedly received kickbacks from anomalous flood control projects in Bulacan, amounting to hundreds of millions of pesos. Alcantara even testified that Villanueva requested around ₱1 billion in flood project allocations for his province. In short: mula sa Pork Barrel, ngayon Flood Barrel naman. And that makes the irony flood-level high - a preacher who once said “the righteous shall govern” now being accused of engineering a flood of corruption. ⸻ 📚 Quo Warranto 101 Now, what is this quo warranto thing everyone’s whispering about? It literally means “by what authority.” It’s a legal proceeding questioning a person’s right to hold a public office - and it’s precisely what ousted Sereno in 2018 despite her impeachment immunity. If the Ombudsman’s perpetual disqualification still stands - and if Villanueva’s Certificate of Candidacy (CoC) was filed while that decision remained in effect - then his eligibility to serve as senator is in question. That means his CoC could be void, and technically, he’s illegally occupying a Senate seat. As one electoral lawyer put it: 👉 “If his disqualification was never lifted, then the Senate is harboring an impostor under the law.” ⸻ 💀 The Death of the Aguinaldo Doctrine Villanueva reportedly invoked the Aguinaldo Doctrine, or the “Condonation Doctrine,” saying that reelection cleanses past sins. Pero sorry, Brother Joel - the Supreme Court already killed that doctrine in 2015 (Carpio-Morales v. CA and Binay Jr.). Wala nang “forgiven by reelection” defense. The people’s vote doesn’t erase the Ombudsman’s judgment. ⸻ 🕯️ A Test of Institutional Courage This issue now falls on the new Ombudsman - will he have the spine to enforce the 2016 decision? Because if not, it becomes a chilling message: “You can’t be punished if you’re powerful enough to pray on camera.” Public office is not an altar for redemption. It’s a test of accountability. And right now, Villanueva’s halo is hanging by a thread. #JoelVillanueva

ST. JOEL VILLANUEVA IN HIS FULL BLOWN ACTOR ERA. A-MUST READ PO! “THE PASTOR, THE PORK, AND THE PENDING QUO WARRANTO: The Joel Villanueva Paradox” By: Tindig Pilipino/FB “I don’t intend to run anymore in public office.” Sabi ni Senator Joel Villanueva - parang isang confession na may halong pagod, guilt, at political survival instinct. Pero kung pakikinggan mo ang mga bulungan sa likod ng Senado, hindi raw ito voluntary exit - kundi strategic retreat bago pa siya mapatalsik. Ayon kay Nosy Tarsee, there’s talk of a quo warranto petition brewing - the same legal weapon na ginamit para patalsikin si Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno noong 2018. ⸻ ⚖️ The Ghost of 2016 Let’s rewind. In 2016, Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales ordered Joel Villanueva’s dismissal and perpetual disqualification from public office for misusing ₱10 million in PDAF funds intended for livelihood projects. The findings were damning - fake NGOs, ghost beneficiaries, and forged documents. The Ombudsman even forwarded the case to the Sandiganbayan, where malversation and falsification charges were filed - and to this day, no final resolution has been rendered. In short: the case is still pending, but the disqualification order still stands. ⸻ 🧾 The Senate’s Selective Blindness The Ombudsman’s decision was clear - dismissal and perpetual disqualification. Pero the Senate refused to enforce it, claiming “separation of powers.” In Tagalog: “Bahala na kami sa sarili naming dumi.” That move practically neutered the Ombudsman’s authority. Even Morales herself, in later interviews, said it made the country look like a joke in the eyes of the world - because the rule of law seemed optional for the powerful. ⸻ 🌊 Then Came the Flood (Control Scam) Fast forward to 2025 - DPWH District Engineer Henry Alcantara dropped his own bombshell before the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee. He named Villanueva among those who allegedly received kickbacks from anomalous flood control projects in Bulacan, amounting to hundreds of millions of pesos. Alcantara even testified that Villanueva requested around ₱1 billion in flood project allocations for his province. In short: mula sa Pork Barrel, ngayon Flood Barrel naman. And that makes the irony flood-level high - a preacher who once said “the righteous shall govern” now being accused of engineering a flood of corruption. ⸻ 📚 Quo Warranto 101 Now, what is this quo warranto thing everyone’s whispering about? It literally means “by what authority.” It’s a legal proceeding questioning a person’s right to hold a public office - and it’s precisely what ousted Sereno in 2018 despite her impeachment immunity. If the Ombudsman’s perpetual disqualification still stands - and if Villanueva’s Certificate of Candidacy (CoC) was filed while that decision remained in effect - then his eligibility to serve as senator is in question. That means his CoC could be void, and technically, he’s illegally occupying a Senate seat. As one electoral lawyer put it: 👉 “If his disqualification was never lifted, then the Senate is harboring an impostor under the law.” ⸻ 💀 The Death of the Aguinaldo Doctrine Villanueva reportedly invoked the Aguinaldo Doctrine, or the “Condonation Doctrine,” saying that reelection cleanses past sins. Pero sorry, Brother Joel - the Supreme Court already killed that doctrine in 2015 (Carpio-Morales v. CA and Binay Jr.). Wala nang “forgiven by reelection” defense. The people’s vote doesn’t erase the Ombudsman’s judgment. ⸻ 🕯️ A Test of Institutional Courage This issue now falls on the new Ombudsman - will he have the spine to enforce the 2016 decision? Because if not, it becomes a chilling message: “You can’t be punished if you’re powerful enough to pray on camera.” Public office is not an altar for redemption. It’s a test of accountability. And right now, Villanueva’s halo is hanging by a thread. #JoelVillanueva

Facts & Politics

278,459 views • 11 months ago

Can anybody from the Senate media ask Sen. Padilla what is the basis of his statement that we lost Scarborough during PNoy admin? Because these are the facts: 1. There are no Chinese ships INSIDE Scarborough shoal. 2. There is no Chinese reclamation or base on Scarborough shoal. Simply put, there is no physical occupation by China on Scarborough. The media can verify and confirm these facts with the Ph Navy and PCG. 3. The Philippine Baselines Law, which I principally authored, is the official Ph claim for Scarborough Shoal and the KIG. Our claims were acknowledged as compliant when the baseline coordinates and regime of islands claims as stated in the said law were formally submitted to the UNCLOS secretariat in 2009. 4. The Arbitral Tribunal ruling in 2016 debunked the 9-dash line claim of Ch over Scarborough Shoal and the Spratlys. Therefore, Ph has a much stronger legal claim over Scarborough than Ch. So, if there is no physical occupation by Ch and there are much stronger legal Ph claims, what is now the basis of this oft repeated lie that we lost Scarborough during PNoy admin? WALA! When I researched on this, the first person who said that we lost Scarborough without any factual and legal basis at all is Mr. Harry Roque (paulit-ulit ding sinabi ito ni Duterte during the 2016 campaign and thereafter). So, as then Chairman of the Committee on National Defense and Security, I conducted hearings in 2013 and 2015 where I asked the Ph Defense officials then if we indeed lose Scarborough and they categorically said: "NO, WE DID NOT LOSE SCARBOROUGH." I even invited Mr. Roque in the 2015 hearing so that he could hear it himself. (See video below) These are all in the Senate records. To the Ph media, next time a resource person says that we lost Scarborough during the PNoy admin, can you ask that person what is his basis for saying so? I assure you, hindi nya masasagot ito. Kasi nga walang basehan. You need to ask this because every time a Filipino resource person says this baseless statement, he is not only unwittingly weakening our position as regards Scarborough but also basically conceding our sovereignty to Ch. Such would be a very unpatriotic thing to do. Finally, to Senator Robin Padilla, my unsolicited advice sayo ay magresearch o magtanong sa iyong mga advisers o staff bago magsalita tungkol sa mga importanteng bagay. Bilang isang halal na Senador, ikaw ay kumakatawan di lang ng pula o green, kundi kasama na rin ang mga yellow, pink at ang mga hindi bumoto sayo. Senador ka naming lahat na Pilipino.

Can anybody from the Senate media ask Sen. Padilla what is the basis of his statement that we lost Scarborough during PNoy admin? Because these are the facts: 1. There are no Chinese ships INSIDE Scarborough shoal. 2. There is no Chinese reclamation or base on Scarborough shoal. Simply put, there is no physical occupation by China on Scarborough. The media can verify and confirm these facts with the Ph Navy and PCG. 3. The Philippine Baselines Law, which I principally authored, is the official Ph claim for Scarborough Shoal and the KIG. Our claims were acknowledged as compliant when the baseline coordinates and regime of islands claims as stated in the said law were formally submitted to the UNCLOS secretariat in 2009. 4. The Arbitral Tribunal ruling in 2016 debunked the 9-dash line claim of Ch over Scarborough Shoal and the Spratlys. Therefore, Ph has a much stronger legal claim over Scarborough than Ch. So, if there is no physical occupation by Ch and there are much stronger legal Ph claims, what is now the basis of this oft repeated lie that we lost Scarborough during PNoy admin? WALA! When I researched on this, the first person who said that we lost Scarborough without any factual and legal basis at all is Mr. Harry Roque (paulit-ulit ding sinabi ito ni Duterte during the 2016 campaign and thereafter). So, as then Chairman of the Committee on National Defense and Security, I conducted hearings in 2013 and 2015 where I asked the Ph Defense officials then if we indeed lose Scarborough and they categorically said: "NO, WE DID NOT LOSE SCARBOROUGH." I even invited Mr. Roque in the 2015 hearing so that he could hear it himself. (See video below) These are all in the Senate records. To the Ph media, next time a resource person says that we lost Scarborough during the PNoy admin, can you ask that person what is his basis for saying so? I assure you, hindi nya masasagot ito. Kasi nga walang basehan. You need to ask this because every time a Filipino resource person says this baseless statement, he is not only unwittingly weakening our position as regards Scarborough but also basically conceding our sovereignty to Ch. Such would be a very unpatriotic thing to do. Finally, to Senator Robin Padilla, my unsolicited advice sayo ay magresearch o magtanong sa iyong mga advisers o staff bago magsalita tungkol sa mga importanteng bagay. Bilang isang halal na Senador, ikaw ay kumakatawan di lang ng pula o green, kundi kasama na rin ang mga yellow, pink at ang mga hindi bumoto sayo. Senador ka naming lahat na Pilipino.

Sonny Trillanes IV

471,878 views • 3 years ago