正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Kimi K3 vs. GPT 5.6 Sol. Both outputs rendered with Seedance 2.0.

higgsfield_ai's profile picture

Higgsfield AI 🧩

208,634 subscribers

364,761 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Model eval round: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5. Rendered with Seedance 2.0.
0:14

Model eval round: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5. Rendered with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

30,743 次观看 • 7 天前

Model comparison: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in a game POV edition generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:11

Model comparison: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in a game POV edition generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

37,992 次观看 • 9 天前

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same dinosaur animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.
0:16

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same dinosaur animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.

Abhishek

91,019 次观看 • 5 天前

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs GPT Images 2.0, both fed into Seedance 2.0.
0:12

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs GPT Images 2.0, both fed into Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

91,582 次观看 • 10 天前

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads
0:14

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads

Romain Torres

2,100,163 次观看 • 8 天前

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both were animated with Seedance 2.0. Check replies to find the prompt 🧵
0:12

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both were animated with Seedance 2.0. Check replies to find the prompt 🧵

Higgsfield AI 🧩

35,308 次观看 • 7 天前

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP
0:13

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP

Romain Torres

182,035 次观看 • 3 天前

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.
0:13

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

Bhavy☄️

437,837 次观看 • 2 天前

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2
0:14

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2

Shara

13,631 次观看 • 1 个月前

GPT image2 → GPT 5.5 → Seedance 2.0
0:10

GPT image2 → GPT 5.5 → Seedance 2.0

D.Motoki@全国統一生成AI活用技能試験営業部長

301,272 次观看 • 2 个月前

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2 Prompt below:
0:13

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2 Prompt below:

Shara

17,353 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5. Both videos were generated with Seedance 2.0 in 4K.
0:14

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5. Both videos were generated with Seedance 2.0 in 4K.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

264,842 次观看 • 17 天前

How Seedream 5.0 Pro and GPT Images 2.0 handle action scenes when paired with Seedance 2.0.
0:13

How Seedream 5.0 Pro and GPT Images 2.0 handle action scenes when paired with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

23,121 次观看 • 9 天前

Kimi K3 vs Fable 5 $16.45 vs $37.94
0:12

Kimi K3 vs Fable 5 $16.45 vs $37.94

shirish

1,113,560 次观看 • 1 天前

trying boxing in Renoise 🥊 created with GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 example ↓
0:10

trying boxing in Renoise 🥊 created with GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 example ↓

Renoise

14,868 次观看 • 1 个月前

I'm doing so many RL experiments with GPT-5.6 Sol I'm trying to mix emergent behavior with RL
0:12

I'm doing so many RL experiments with GPT-5.6 Sol I'm trying to mix emergent behavior with RL

Angel 🌼

39,264 次观看 • 6 天前

let go. Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT Image 2 on SJinn Agent Prompt ⤵️
0:14

let go. Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT Image 2 on SJinn Agent Prompt ⤵️

TechieSA

17,331 次观看 • 2 个月前

GPT Image 2.0 and Seedance 2.0 work together on Higgsfield 🍃GPT Image 2.0 handles high-quality visuals 🍃Seedance 2.0 turns those visuals into videos Together they act as a full AI production pipeline.
0:10

GPT Image 2.0 and Seedance 2.0 work together on Higgsfield 🍃GPT Image 2.0 handles high-quality visuals 🍃Seedance 2.0 turns those visuals into videos Together they act as a full AI production pipeline.

Sharon Riley

10,329 次观看 • 2 个月前

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 on agentic prompting. Both videos generated using Seedance 2.0.
0:13

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 on agentic prompting. Both videos generated using Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

64,338 次观看 • 15 天前

Grok 4.5 performed GPT Sol level for free! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: -robot deathmatch, Tombstone vs Minotaur -a hydraulic press flattening stuff on a conveyor -a semi truck jumping a canyon Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol: 12.9K tokens, $0.51 (~7 min) Grok 4.5: 10.8K tokens, $0 (~5 min) Muse Spark 1.1: 26.8K tokens, $0.12 (~7.5 min) GLM 5.2: 10.9K tokens, $0.02 (~12 min) Grok 4.5 handled all three scenes genuinely well and got surprisingly close to GPT-5.6 this round. On top of that, it ran on the free tier. GPT-5.6 Sol, the frontier model, put out solid but not standout work. GLM 5.2 rendered all three scenes for pennies, but it came out the roughest of the four. Meta's new Muse Spark burned the most tokens yet still stayed cheap, delivering an average result.
0:18

Grok 4.5 performed GPT Sol level for free! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: -robot deathmatch, Tombstone vs Minotaur -a hydraulic press flattening stuff on a conveyor -a semi truck jumping a canyon Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol: 12.9K tokens, $0.51 (~7 min) Grok 4.5: 10.8K tokens, $0 (~5 min) Muse Spark 1.1: 26.8K tokens, $0.12 (~7.5 min) GLM 5.2: 10.9K tokens, $0.02 (~12 min) Grok 4.5 handled all three scenes genuinely well and got surprisingly close to GPT-5.6 this round. On top of that, it ran on the free tier. GPT-5.6 Sol, the frontier model, put out solid but not standout work. GLM 5.2 rendered all three scenes for pennies, but it came out the roughest of the four. Meta's new Muse Spark burned the most tokens yet still stayed cheap, delivering an average result.

atomic.chat

70,064 次观看 • 8 天前