Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Kimi K3 vs. MiniMax M3.1 Flash | WebGPU & 3D Koi Pond Simulation One technical challenge. Two AI models. Different approaches to interactive 3D development. Testing both models on a WebGPU-powered 3D koi pond, featuring realistic water ripples, swimming koi fish, dynamic reflections, and real-time rendering. MiniMax M3.1 Flash...

79,210 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

27 Kommentare

Profilbild von Zara Tech & Tools
Zara Tech & Toolsvor 11 Tagen

Great technical comparison and creative benchmark

Profilbild von Elix
Elixvor 11 Tagen

Interactive 3D demos are a great way to benchmark coding models

Profilbild von PreneursCircle
PreneursCirclevor 11 Tagen

Curious which model needed fewer iterations to get it working

Profilbild von BuildersSpace
BuildersSpacevor 11 Tagen

Can both models maintain smooth performance with multiple animated fish?

Profilbild von Businessaholic
Businessaholicvor 11 Tagen

Real-time rendering adds a whole new layer of complexity

Profilbild von matteo
matteovor 11 Tagen

curious. just use the prompt and not provided any 3d assets?

Profilbild von Jessica
Jessicavor 11 Tagen

Those water reflections are where things get interesting 👀

Profilbild von Alex Ai | Tools & Updates
Alex Ai | Tools & Updatesvor 11 Tagen

WebGPU 3D koi pond with realistic ripples looks absolutely mesmerizing

Profilbild von Arfa Farheen
Arfa Farheenvor 11 Tagen

Soft-body physics is a much more interesting test than a static 3D model

Profilbild von EntrepBuilder
EntrepBuildervor 11 Tagen

WebGPU is a great test of how far AI coding has come.

Profilbild von Nova Tech
Nova Techvor 11 Tagen

Great benchmark comparison interactive 3D rendering impressive technical demonstration work

Profilbild von Mira Synth Tech
Mira Synth Techvor 11 Tagen

Great benchmark M3.1 Flash looks impressively fast for 3D work

Profilbild von Aaliya
Aaliyavor 11 Tagen

The water ripples and fish movements make this a great test.

Profilbild von Business Corner | Showcasing Entrepreneur
Business Corner | Showcasing Entrepreneurvor 11 Tagen

MiniMax looks promising for rapid prototyping 🔥

Profilbild von Charly Adams
Charly Adamsvor 11 Tagen

Sounds like a fun experiment! It's always interesting to see how different AI models handle creative tasks like that.

Profilbild von Edward Frank Morris 🦇
Edward Frank Morris 🦇vor 11 Tagen

This is a much more meaningful test than a simple coding prompt

Profilbild von Veyra | AI & Tech
Veyra | AI & Techvor 11 Tagen

The koi pond test is such a creative benchmark choice

Profilbild von Alice The Ai Expert
Alice The Ai Expertvor 11 Tagen

Turning complex WebGPU ideas into a live interactive koi pond incredible demo of creative coding speed!

Profilbild von Darce
Darcevor 11 Tagen

A koi pond is a sneaky good test, water ripples and fish motion expose sloppy shader code fast. Did either model get the WebGPU setup right first try?

Profilbild von Evia AI
Evia AIvor 11 Tagen

Great benchmark showing AI models powering richer interactive experiences

Profilbild von EDDY VU
EDDY VUvor 11 Tagen

Super interesting approach, how are you handling edge cases when scaling concurrent workloads?

Profilbild von Alex So
Alex Sovor 11 Tagen

Could you share the prompt and a runnable link for each version? I'd compare frame time on the same device and how many manual fixes each needed.

Profilbild von Business Mindful
Business Mindfulvor 11 Tagen

The difference in execution speed would be interesting to compare

Profilbild von RAZA | AI EXPLORER
RAZA | AI EXPLORERvor 11 Tagen

Great benchmark. Real-world interactive builds reveal far more about a model’s coding abilities than scores alone.

Profilbild von ApexAIHighlight
ApexAIHighlightvor 11 Tagen

A beautiful demo is one thing. Clean, maintainable code is another

Profilbild von Sufyan Maan, M.Eng
Sufyan Maan, M.Engvor 11 Tagen

Would love to see how both models handle WebGPU fallbacks

Profilbild von Oliver
Olivervor 11 Tagen

Speed matters, but working output matters more

Ähnliche Videos

I built FlashDesk with MiniMax (official) M3.1 Flash 🐰⚡ But can an AI agent do more than just generate text? I wanted to explore that question by building a practical AI customer-support workflow. Meet FlashDesk 👇 💡 An AI-powered customer support agent designed to help teams handle repetitive tickets more efficiently. Here's what it can do: → Analyze incoming customer queries → Categorize issues and assess urgency → Generate context-aware response drafts → Recommend next steps → Flag sensitive cases for human review Why MiniMax M3.1 Flash? Building useful AI agents requires more than a good response. It requires models that can support complex workflows while keeping speed and cost in mind. ⚡ Agentic capabilities: Designed for multi-step workflows and tool calling. 💻 Coding capabilities: Helps developers build and iterate on practical AI applications. 🚀 Speed: MiniMax reports nearly 3× faster online inference compared with its previous generation. 💰 Cost efficiency: MiniMax reports 70% lower overall usage cost for agentic tasks compared with its predecessor. In FlashDesk, these capabilities come together in a workflow that turns a customer ticket into a structured analysis, a suggested response, and clear next steps. And when it comes to sensitive billing disputes, AI assists while humans stay in control. That's what excites me about building with MiniMax M3.1 Flash: turning model capabilities into practical applications. 🎥 Watch the demo and see FlashDesk in action. Try out now: What would you build with MiniMax M3.1 Flash? #MiniMax #M31Flash #AIAgents #BuildWithAI

Dipanshu Kushwaha

25,227 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen