Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Kindergarten teacher claims half the class raised their hands wanting to be a different gender. The kids who didn’t got sent to the corner and told to be quiet. Then had them pick brand new names and pronouns. One chose “Cookie” and “zir.” Now wants the school board to...

305,048 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.

Jan Jekielek

13,429 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Then came the topic no one wanted to touch—Title IX. Stephen Miller didn’t flinch. He said the gender cult is over, and this administration is putting an end to the chaos. It starts with protecting women’s spaces and sports. “We are using every legal and financial tool we have—at President Trump’s direction—to make it clear: schools and universities will lose federal funds if they allow men to invade women’s sports and women’s spaces.” He said the new rules apply across the board, from kindergarten through college, and he pointed to Maine as the first case in motion. But the problem goes deeper than sports. Miller called out what he sees happening in classrooms behind parents’ backs—teachers socially transitioning young kids without telling their families. “If a 5-year-old or 6-year-old goes to school and the teacher tries to turn the boy into a girl or the girl into a boy—that’s child abuse,” he said. “This administration is treating it as a gross violation of parental rights.” Then came a warning for hospitals: the Trump administration is done funding disastrous child gender surgeries. “You cannot and will not be allowed to use taxpayer dollars to perform chemical castrations and sexual mutilations of children.” He described the procedures—castration surgeries, sterilization treatments, puberty blockers—as “barbaric,” “unethical,” and “irreversible.” “It is child torture, child abuse, and medical malpractice.” Miller credited Bobby Kennedy at HHS for leading the charge. He said all of the Biden-era policies promoting child sex changes have been removed, and new guidance is going out: these procedures are banned. The mutilation stops now.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

369,834 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A shameful guillotining of consideration and debate of amendments to the ‘Hate Crimes’ legislation took place last Wednesday night in the Seanad. The Bill goes back to the Dáil now. So we had no Report Stage for the Minister to explain her thinking; no explanation for the new, dangerous definition of ‘gender’ other than that it is inclusive; even a claim by the Minister not to understand my position on the issue. Let’s spell it out one more time. The Bill comes up with a new definition of ‘gender’ that conflates the issues of ‘gender’, as always understood, and ‘gender identity’. The timelessly understood idea of the gender binary, i.e. male and female, is displaced by a new, fluid and unscientific gender spectrum notion. This conflation is totally unnecessary for the protection of any individual or class of person. The Bill could simply have listed both ‘gender’ and ‘gender identity or expression’ as separate protected characteristics, (as was done for example in the 2017 Victims of Crime Act). But the Minister would not do this. No adequate reason was ever offered for the new definition other than that it was 'futureproofing' (Simon Harris) and ‘inclusive’ (Helen McEntee). The new definition will have an immediate contagion effect across all criminal legislation aligned or altered by the ‘Hate Crimes’ Bill. The same politicians who foisted this on us will (if returned at the election) continue to seek to harness all laws built around the ordinary meaning of ‘gender’ (as in male or female) and apply these instead to an indefinite range of gender identities. The new definition will give new cover to those promoting gender ideology to young people—especially in new school curricula. It will give ideological support to the invasion by certain men of womens’ spaces and sports. It will provide cover for dangerous HSE approaches to gender dysphoria. It will be used to shore up the unpopular Athena Swan charters imposed by the HEA on third level academics. It will lead to a dismantling of the Equality Acts. Men can be women, and you simply have to suck it up. This Government sought to erase women and the concept of ‘mother’ from the Constitution earlier this year as part of the same fringe ideology. The People, by a large majority, stopped them. The Government refused to learn and doubled down on its woke policy. Your TDs could actually block this Bill in the coming days—if they were willing to defh the party whip. So please let them know what you think. I told the Minister on Wednesday that she will not deserve the votes of any parents of schoolgoing children if she maintains this corrupt definition of ‘gender’ in this legislation. Politicians who will not stand up for sex/gender really do not deserve to be returned. They are enablers of harmful practices. The voters will have an opportunity to choose new representatives soon for the next Dail. They should punish irresponsible TDs and choose more wisely next time. Look for good quality Independents and sympathetic small parties, and Members of the larger parties only if they vocally and clearly defy their political masters. We urgently need change.

Senator Rónán Mullen

46,113 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr