Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

King: Can you update us on Russian intelligence sharing with Iran? Gabbard: If it's going on, that answer would be appropriate for a closed session King: It's been in the press. Is it occurring? Gabbard: What I can tell you is that according to the Dept of War, any...

unusual_whales's profile picture

unusual_whales

4,303,197 subscribers

1,101,811 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsFinance
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

💥NEW: CNN's Smerconish calls on Congress to *AUTHORIZE* Iran Conflict💥 "Do you believe it's essential that Iran NOT acquire a nuclear weapon? If that answer is yes — and I believe the answer is OBVIOUSLY yes — then authorize the military action necessary to achieve that."
6:02

💥NEW: CNN's Smerconish calls on Congress to *AUTHORIZE* Iran Conflict💥 "Do you believe it's essential that Iran NOT acquire a nuclear weapon? If that answer is yes — and I believe the answer is OBVIOUSLY yes — then authorize the military action necessary to achieve that."

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

25,894 views • 3 months ago

King: The president says nobody knew. My question is did you tell him? Ratcliffe: The president gets briefings constantly about intelligence. The comments you talked about, I had not heard. Gabbard: Because of that longstanding assessment that the IC has continued to report that the department of war took the preemptive planning measures that they did. King: They stated they did not plan for the strait of hormuz. The president said who knew that was going to happen.
2:00

King: The president says nobody knew. My question is did you tell him? Ratcliffe: The president gets briefings constantly about intelligence. The comments you talked about, I had not heard. Gabbard: Because of that longstanding assessment that the IC has continued to report that the department of war took the preemptive planning measures that they did. King: They stated they did not plan for the strait of hormuz. The president said who knew that was going to happen.

Acyn

82,703 views • 4 months ago

"If you are saying that you are hearing what is going on, you must show action as a king, for us to know that we have a king in Ekpoma." - Protester tells the Onojie of Ekpoma
2:07

"If you are saying that you are hearing what is going on, you must show action as a king, for us to know that we have a king in Ekpoma." - Protester tells the Onojie of Ekpoma

The Benin Blogger

21,639 views • 6 months ago

Trump on the Iran war: I actually think it's very popular what I'm doing. I can tell you worldwide, the world is thanking me.
0:27

Trump on the Iran war: I actually think it's very popular what I'm doing. I can tell you worldwide, the world is thanking me.

Republicans against Trump

99,434 views • 2 months ago

Wow! Mark Carney thinks that the war with Iran was worth it. Q: Do you believe the war was worth it? A: the number one risk in the global economy is Iran because I've always believed that it's the biggest exporter of terror. It was hell-bent on getting a nuclear weapon. Moving to this position where that's been taken off the table, YES. The reintegration of Iran, this is a regime that needs to learn to be civilized, needs to behave. Great answer and perhaps a total game changer of answer.
0:51

Wow! Mark Carney thinks that the war with Iran was worth it. Q: Do you believe the war was worth it? A: the number one risk in the global economy is Iran because I've always believed that it's the biggest exporter of terror. It was hell-bent on getting a nuclear weapon. Moving to this position where that's been taken off the table, YES. The reintegration of Iran, this is a regime that needs to learn to be civilized, needs to behave. Great answer and perhaps a total game changer of answer.

Kirk Lubimov

10,926 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 DNI TULSI GABBARD: "I NEVER SAID IRAN CAN'T MAKE NUKES" "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months. Trump has been clear that can’t happen, and I agree." Source: DNI Tulsi Gabbard
1:48

🇺🇸🇮🇷 DNI TULSI GABBARD: "I NEVER SAID IRAN CAN'T MAKE NUKES" "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months. Trump has been clear that can’t happen, and I agree." Source: DNI Tulsi Gabbard

Mario Nawfal

166,173 views • 1 year ago

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."
3:47

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."

Joe Murgia

757,327 views • 1 year ago

2024: Donald Trump, "If Kamala wins only death and destruction await because she is the candidate of endless wars. I am the candidate of peace. I am peace. People don't believe that but I am peace" - then criticises Liz Cheney for wanting to attack Iran 2025: President Trump announces the US Military has attacked Iran to stop their nuclear threat US Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, "Iran is not building a nuclear weapon" Bernie Sanders, "Not only is this news alarming, it is grossly unconstitutional. The only entity that can take this country to war is the US Congress. The President does not have the right"
1:49

2024: Donald Trump, "If Kamala wins only death and destruction await because she is the candidate of endless wars. I am the candidate of peace. I am peace. People don't believe that but I am peace" - then criticises Liz Cheney for wanting to attack Iran 2025: President Trump announces the US Military has attacked Iran to stop their nuclear threat US Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, "Iran is not building a nuclear weapon" Bernie Sanders, "Not only is this news alarming, it is grossly unconstitutional. The only entity that can take this country to war is the US Congress. The President does not have the right"

Farrukh

21,234 views • 1 year ago

“(Tulsi Gabbard) is the director of national intelligence. She testified almost a year ago that the intelligence assessments are that Iran is not working on a nuclear weapon.” -Judge Napolitano
1:20

“(Tulsi Gabbard) is the director of national intelligence. She testified almost a year ago that the intelligence assessments are that Iran is not working on a nuclear weapon.” -Judge Napolitano

Uncommon Sense

24,061 views • 4 months ago

KELLY: Is it accurate that Russia has gained billions of dollars in additional oil revenue due to price strikes due to the war against Iran and loosened sanctions? GABBARD: Uh, that is what has been reporting. I would defer to the Secretary of Treasury
1:06

KELLY: Is it accurate that Russia has gained billions of dollars in additional oil revenue due to price strikes due to the war against Iran and loosened sanctions? GABBARD: Uh, that is what has been reporting. I would defer to the Secretary of Treasury

Aaron Rupar

58,033 views • 4 months ago

Tulsi Gabbard: 🚨 The Intelligence Community did not assess an imminent nuclear threat from Iran following last Summer’s airstrike Ossoffd: The IC determined that Iran’s nuclear enrichment program enrichment program was obliterated by last summers airstrike. Correct? Gabbard: Yes… Ossoff: Last night, you stated there’s been no effort since then to rebuild their enrichment capability, correct? Gabbard: That’s right.. Ossoff: The WH says this new war was launched to eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by Iran. —— “Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: The IC determined that Iran maintained the intention to rebuild and grow their nuclear enrichment capabilities. ——The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: False…
2:54

Tulsi Gabbard: 🚨 The Intelligence Community did not assess an imminent nuclear threat from Iran following last Summer’s airstrike Ossoffd: The IC determined that Iran’s nuclear enrichment program enrichment program was obliterated by last summers airstrike. Correct? Gabbard: Yes… Ossoff: Last night, you stated there’s been no effort since then to rebuild their enrichment capability, correct? Gabbard: That’s right.. Ossoff: The WH says this new war was launched to eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by Iran. —— “Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: The IC determined that Iran maintained the intention to rebuild and grow their nuclear enrichment capabilities. ——The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: False…

MJTruthUltra

440,571 views • 4 months ago

🚨Miko Peled: 'The US🇺🇸 and Israel KNOW that an attack on Iran🇮🇷 is more than they can handle.' 'I don't believe for one second that anyone is going to attack Iran, I don't think they've got what it takes and I think they realise that strategically, it would be a massive mistake.' 'The attack on Yemen is punishing the Yemeni forces for their stance on Palestine...the Yemeni forces stood for Palestine, they responded to the genocide, they were very successful. The Port of Eilat is bankrupt, not a single shipment of cars, nothing is coming in. It's hurting the Israeli economy severely and so they're being punished for that.' 'Iran is a whole different avenue, I think the Americans and the Israelis know full well that a full-on attack on Iran is more than they can handle.' -Miko Peled on Going Underground as Israel reportedly plans an imminent strike against Iran
1:46

🚨Miko Peled: 'The US🇺🇸 and Israel KNOW that an attack on Iran🇮🇷 is more than they can handle.' 'I don't believe for one second that anyone is going to attack Iran, I don't think they've got what it takes and I think they realise that strategically, it would be a massive mistake.' 'The attack on Yemen is punishing the Yemeni forces for their stance on Palestine...the Yemeni forces stood for Palestine, they responded to the genocide, they were very successful. The Port of Eilat is bankrupt, not a single shipment of cars, nothing is coming in. It's hurting the Israeli economy severely and so they're being punished for that.' 'Iran is a whole different avenue, I think the Americans and the Israelis know full well that a full-on attack on Iran is more than they can handle.' -Miko Peled on Going Underground as Israel reportedly plans an imminent strike against Iran

Going Underground

183,643 views • 1 year ago

WELKER: Iran just attacked US allies in the region. Is the US at war with Iran? TRIUMP: I call it a military exercise because people would rather have it called that. It's not a big war for us.
1:11

WELKER: Iran just attacked US allies in the region. Is the US at war with Iran? TRIUMP: I call it a military exercise because people would rather have it called that. It's not a big war for us.

Aaron Rupar

132,768 views • 1 month ago

“I do not support going to war with Iran, which is what it would be” if the U.S. joined in on the attacks, says hawkish Dem Adam Smith, key Pentagon ally
5:50

“I do not support going to war with Iran, which is what it would be” if the U.S. joined in on the attacks, says hawkish Dem Adam Smith, key Pentagon ally

Ryan Grim

64,415 views • 1 year ago

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."
3:09

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

unusual_whales

356,307 views • 3 months ago

In an exchange with Sen. Jon Ossoff at the Senate's Worldwide Threats hearing, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said it's not her job to determine what is an "imminent threat." Gabbard told lawmakers that "the only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president." Read more:
2:02

In an exchange with Sen. Jon Ossoff at the Senate's Worldwide Threats hearing, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said it's not her job to determine what is an "imminent threat." Gabbard told lawmakers that "the only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president." Read more:

CNN

238,272 views • 4 months ago

Rep. Castro: Do you know whether Israel is supportive of Trump's call to make a deal with Iran? DNI Gabbard: I don't know the answer to that Castro: What do you make of Israel's decision to strike infrastructure despite Trump's call to keep those off limits? DNI Gabbard: I don't have an answer for that
0:57

Rep. Castro: Do you know whether Israel is supportive of Trump's call to make a deal with Iran? DNI Gabbard: I don't know the answer to that Castro: What do you make of Israel's decision to strike infrastructure despite Trump's call to keep those off limits? DNI Gabbard: I don't have an answer for that

Headquarters

39,918 views • 4 months ago

🇺🇸 Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner is shocked by Trump's policy on Iran: "Foreign policy spread through tweets is crazy. But that's exactly what this guy is doing. You know, [Director of National Intelligence] Tulsi Gabbard, who has every reason to be confident in her words, previously said that Iran has not taken any steps to build a bomb. On Monday, we received confirmation that the intelligence has not changed. Our president is basically ignoring all intelligence. I have no idea what the current U.S. policy is on this. I'm the vice chairman of the intelligence committee, and if I have no idea, what do the American people know? And what do our friends, the few friends we have left in other countries, know? Last week he said that Israel could do it on its own, without our help. Then we started helping them with their defense. Now he's tweeting his threats. What does "unconditional surrender" mean? Who should Iran surrender to? As I said about war in the Middle East, it is easy to start but difficult to end."
1:12

🇺🇸 Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner is shocked by Trump's policy on Iran: "Foreign policy spread through tweets is crazy. But that's exactly what this guy is doing. You know, [Director of National Intelligence] Tulsi Gabbard, who has every reason to be confident in her words, previously said that Iran has not taken any steps to build a bomb. On Monday, we received confirmation that the intelligence has not changed. Our president is basically ignoring all intelligence. I have no idea what the current U.S. policy is on this. I'm the vice chairman of the intelligence committee, and if I have no idea, what do the American people know? And what do our friends, the few friends we have left in other countries, know? Last week he said that Israel could do it on its own, without our help. Then we started helping them with their defense. Now he's tweeting his threats. What does "unconditional surrender" mean? Who should Iran surrender to? As I said about war in the Middle East, it is easy to start but difficult to end."

Peacemaker

25,278 views • 1 year ago