Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Tulsi Gabbard: 🚨 The Intelligence Community did not assess an imminent nuclear threat from Iran following last Summer’s airstrike Ossoffd: The IC determined that Iran’s nuclear enrichment program enrichment program was obliterated by last summers airstrike. Correct? Gabbard: Yes… Ossoff: Last night, you stated there’s been no effort since...

MJTruthUltra's profile picture

MJTruthUltra

629,642 subscribers

440,571 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfĂźgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct? GABBARD: That's right OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Does the IC assess that there was an imminent nuclear threat? GABBARD: The only person who can determine what is or is not an imminent threat is the president OSSOFF: False
2:59

OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct? GABBARD: That's right OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Does the IC assess that there was an imminent nuclear threat? GABBARD: The only person who can determine what is or is not an imminent threat is the president OSSOFF: False

Aaron Rupar

792,502 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."
3:09

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

unusual_whales

356,379 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Ossoff: So the assessment of the intelligence community is that Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated by last summer's airstrikes? Gabbard: Yes. Ossoff: Your statement stated: there has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. That's the assessment of the intelligence community? Gabbard: Yes.
0:52

Ossoff: So the assessment of the intelligence community is that Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated by last summer's airstrikes? Gabbard: Yes. Ossoff: Your statement stated: there has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. That's the assessment of the intelligence community? Gabbard: Yes.

Acyn

455,976 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

.Ossoff's Office: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."
3:09

.Ossoff's Office: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

CSPAN

678,158 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

WATCH: After stating that the assessment of the Intelligence Community (IC) is that “Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated” by last year’s airstrikes, DNI Tulsi Gabbard repeatedly refuses to say whether it was the IC’s asessment that Iran posed an “imminent nuclear threat” as of March 1, 2026, as claimed by the White House. “It is not the Intelligence Community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat,” she says. Sen. Jon Ossoff: “This is the ‘Worldwide Threats’ hearing... You are here to represent the IC’s ‘assessment of threats.’ That’s a quote from your own opening statement...”
4:18

WATCH: After stating that the assessment of the Intelligence Community (IC) is that “Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated” by last year’s airstrikes, DNI Tulsi Gabbard repeatedly refuses to say whether it was the IC’s asessment that Iran posed an “imminent nuclear threat” as of March 1, 2026, as claimed by the White House. “It is not the Intelligence Community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat,” she says. Sen. Jon Ossoff: “This is the ‘Worldwide Threats’ hearing... You are here to represent the IC’s ‘assessment of threats.’ That’s a quote from your own opening statement...”

Decensored News

24,333 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Ossoff: Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime? Gabbard: The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat. Ossoff: It is precisely your responsibility. This is the worldwide threats hearing where, as you noted in your opening testimony quote, you represent the ic's assessment of threats.
2:49

Ossoff: Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime? Gabbard: The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat. Ossoff: It is precisely your responsibility. This is the worldwide threats hearing where, as you noted in your opening testimony quote, you represent the ic's assessment of threats.

Acyn

1,816,131 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In an exchange with Sen. Jon Ossoff at the Senate's Worldwide Threats hearing, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said it's not her job to determine what is an "imminent threat." Gabbard told lawmakers that "the only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president." Read more:
2:02

In an exchange with Sen. Jon Ossoff at the Senate's Worldwide Threats hearing, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said it's not her job to determine what is an "imminent threat." Gabbard told lawmakers that "the only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president." Read more:

CNN

238,359 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Bera: There is no imminent threat of nuclear breakout. Did you deliver that assessment to the president? Gabbard: I have delivered the intelligence community’s assessment to the president.
1:21

Bera: There is no imminent threat of nuclear breakout. Did you deliver that assessment to the president? Gabbard: I have delivered the intelligence community’s assessment to the president.

Acyn

26,365 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Spy chief Tulsi Gabbard dodged questions about the severity of the threat posed by Iran in Senate testimony on Wednesday. Gabbard declined to say whether she thought Iran represented an “imminent nuclear threat” to the US, as the White House has claimed
1:22

Spy chief Tulsi Gabbard dodged questions about the severity of the threat posed by Iran in Senate testimony on Wednesday. Gabbard declined to say whether she thought Iran represented an “imminent nuclear threat” to the US, as the White House has claimed

Bloomberg

22,540 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sen. Warner: "In your printed testimony today, your last paragraph on page 6, 'As a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated. There's been no efforts to try to rebuild their enrichment capability.' You omitted that from your oral opening. Is that because the president said there was an imminent threat two weeks ago?" Gabbard: "No, sir. I recognized that the time was running long and I skipped through some of the portion of my oral delivered remarks." Warner: "You chose to omit the parts that contradict the president."
1:07

Sen. Warner: "In your printed testimony today, your last paragraph on page 6, 'As a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated. There's been no efforts to try to rebuild their enrichment capability.' You omitted that from your oral opening. Is that because the president said there was an imminent threat two weeks ago?" Gabbard: "No, sir. I recognized that the time was running long and I skipped through some of the portion of my oral delivered remarks." Warner: "You chose to omit the parts that contradict the president."

The Bulwark

35,534 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

BLITZER: Trump has said there was an 'imminent threat' from Iran. What's your understanding of that threat? REP. STUTZMAN: I think the imminent threat is they were going to continue to build -- rebuild -- their nuclear program BLITZER: But Trump said the nuclear facilities were 'obliterated.' So why the need to attack?
1:39

BLITZER: Trump has said there was an 'imminent threat' from Iran. What's your understanding of that threat? REP. STUTZMAN: I think the imminent threat is they were going to continue to build -- rebuild -- their nuclear program BLITZER: But Trump said the nuclear facilities were 'obliterated.' So why the need to attack?

Aaron Rupar

108,069 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) says he stands by the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment by U.S. intelligence leaders who testified at the time that Iran had not reauthorized their nuclear weapons program. “There was no imminent threat to the United States, and I don't believe there was even an imminent threat to Israel from Iran,” he tells Margaret Brennan. “Over a period of time, particularly with the ballistic missile capability, Israel would be more under threat. The decision to go to war in this case was a choice by President Trump.”
1:48

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) says he stands by the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment by U.S. intelligence leaders who testified at the time that Iran had not reauthorized their nuclear weapons program. “There was no imminent threat to the United States, and I don't believe there was even an imminent threat to Israel from Iran,” he tells Margaret Brennan. “Over a period of time, particularly with the ballistic missile capability, Israel would be more under threat. The decision to go to war in this case was a choice by President Trump.”

Face The Nation

24,868 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Iran was not days or weeks away from having a nuclear weapon, the head of the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog Rafael Grossi told Becky Anderson today, contradicting a US claim that Iran posed an imminent nuclear threat.
1:29

Iran was not days or weeks away from having a nuclear weapon, the head of the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog Rafael Grossi told Becky Anderson today, contradicting a US claim that Iran posed an imminent nuclear threat.

CNN International PR

305,350 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."
2:03

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."

Aaron Rupar

228,697 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

From March 26 House Intelligence Committee, DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003." Full video here:
0:38

From March 26 House Intelligence Committee, DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003." Full video here:

CSPAN

38,041 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Rep. Jason Crow: "Did you or the IC make any assessments as to the timing of potential threats facing the United States from Iran?" DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The imminent nature of a threat is determined by the President."
5:06

.Rep. Jason Crow: "Did you or the IC make any assessments as to the timing of potential threats facing the United States from Iran?" DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The imminent nature of a threat is determined by the President."

CSPAN

20,111 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Warner: In your printed testimony: as a result of operation midnight hammer, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated. There's been no efforts to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. You omitted that paragraph from your oral opening. Gabbard: I recognized that the time was running long, and I skipped through some of the portions. Warner: You chose to omit the parts that contradict the president
1:10

Warner: In your printed testimony: as a result of operation midnight hammer, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated. There's been no efforts to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. You omitted that paragraph from your oral opening. Gabbard: I recognized that the time was running long, and I skipped through some of the portions. Warner: You chose to omit the parts that contradict the president

Acyn

151,062 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten