正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

King**a! Naloko na.🥴 • All projects have kickbacks, not just #floodcontrol. • Senators' min. kickback is 25%, sometimes 30%. —Brice Hernandez Risa Hontiveros allegedly inserted ₱750M #floodcontrol proj. from 2025 Nat’l budget —Gerry & Tunying /DZRH

jcco

12,118 subscribers

161,044 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治 #floodcontrol #floodcontrol

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

'MAY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE NA KAMI' Senator Panfilo Lacson said he is building a case against Senator Alan Peter Cayetano over alleged irregularities involving the 2025 General Appropriations Act (GAA) budget insertions for projects in Taguig City. Speaking on BNC's Agenda Weekend, Lacson claimed that information gathered by his camp—still subject to validation—indicates Cayetano allegedly received kickbacks of no less than 25 percent from the projects. He also claimed that they have identified an alleged bagman linked to the projects, but declined to disclose the person's identity as the case is still being developed. Lacson said documentary evidence has already been gathered and that some information has been submitted to the Office of the Ombudsman. However, he added that he prefers to present the evidence first before the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee once its hearings resume. More on this in the full episode of #AgendaWeekend

'MAY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE NA KAMI' Senator Panfilo Lacson said he is building a case against Senator Alan Peter Cayetano over alleged irregularities involving the 2025 General Appropriations Act (GAA) budget insertions for projects in Taguig City. Speaking on BNC's Agenda Weekend, Lacson claimed that information gathered by his camp—still subject to validation—indicates Cayetano allegedly received kickbacks of no less than 25 percent from the projects. He also claimed that they have identified an alleged bagman linked to the projects, but declined to disclose the person's identity as the case is still being developed. Lacson said documentary evidence has already been gathered and that some information has been submitted to the Office of the Ombudsman. However, he added that he prefers to present the evidence first before the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee once its hearings resume. More on this in the full episode of #AgendaWeekend

Bilyonaryo News Channel

75,767 次观看 • 1 个月前

Dan Bilzerian is a 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒖𝒍𝒔𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝑳𝒊𝒂𝒓 🧵: 𝑵𝒂𝒗𝒚 𝑺𝑬𝑨𝑳𝑺 : At the start of Dan Bilzerian’s rise to fame, Dan claimed that he was a Navy SEAL. According to Dan, he told would tell people this lie because “In my mind I pretty much did complete it [SEAL training] (…) and then I forgot about it.” Dan’s friend 𝑱𝒂𝒌𝒆 𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒆𝒍𝒅𝒔 (Jake Shields) is still saying that Dan was a SEAL as recently as 𝑻𝑶𝑫𝑨𝒀. Dan has never finished his Navy SEAL program. He is currently enlisted in the Armenian Military as a reservist. 𝑷𝒐𝒌𝒆𝒓 𝑪𝒉𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒊𝒐𝒏: On Joe Rogan’s podcast, Dan claimed that he made all of his money from Poker. There is no evidence that Dan has won any major tournaments — there are essentially zero tournament winnings on record. In 2014 (in an interview with Kevin O’Leary) Dan claimed that he won $𝟏𝟎.𝟖 𝑴𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒐𝒏 in a single night playing against a billionaire. Dan has been asked for proof but allegedly has never provided any. 𝑫𝒂𝒏’𝒔 𝑻𝒓𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒔: Dan was allegedly given access to 2 separate Trust Funds. One at 30 years old and another at 35 years old. Dan claims he gave all of that money to his brother because he “didn’t need it, didn’t want it, didn’t care.” 𝑫𝒂𝒏’𝒔 𝑭𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒚: In interviews, Dan has claimed that he is not “super close” with his family and has never taken money from them. However, Dan’s father was allegedly heavily involved in running his “𝑰𝒈𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒆”company as an unpaid consultant. Dan allegedly approached the company’s shareholders and his father, complaining that he wasn’t happy with the direction the company was going. Dan’s father was convicted of Securities & Tax Law violations in 1989. The government claimed Paul Bilzerian allegedly hid assets in family trusts to avoid paying $62,000,000 in fines and back taxes. As of 2026, Paul Bilzerian allegedly owes $𝟏𝟖𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 to the government. 𝑳𝒂𝒘𝒔𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒔: Dan’s company allegedly 𝑰𝒈𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒆 faced multiple lawsuits from investors and former employees claiming fraud, mismanagement, and breach of contract. Dan has admitted in interviews that the company allegedly functioned as his own personal piggy bank to fund his lavish lifestyle. His LA mansion was allegedly $𝟐𝟎𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 per month in rent. Ignite allegedly burned through $𝟏𝟎𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 in just a few years and filed for bankruptcy in 2020. 𝑪𝒓𝒚𝒑𝒕𝒐: Dan has allegedly spearheaded multiple crypto projects — NFTs, memecoins, and other “investment opportunities” that have allegedly all failed. This led to Dan offering “lifestyle courses” online, which have allegedly been widely criticized as scams. (In this post, I have included clips from YouTube channels “JamesonsTravels,” “JamarisSpeaks,” and “Aeth-tv.”) 𝑫𝒂𝒏 𝒊𝒔 𝒂 𝒍𝒊𝒂𝒓.

Dan Bilzerian is a 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒖𝒍𝒔𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝑳𝒊𝒂𝒓 🧵: 𝑵𝒂𝒗𝒚 𝑺𝑬𝑨𝑳𝑺 : At the start of Dan Bilzerian’s rise to fame, Dan claimed that he was a Navy SEAL. According to Dan, he told would tell people this lie because “In my mind I pretty much did complete it [SEAL training] (…) and then I forgot about it.” Dan’s friend 𝑱𝒂𝒌𝒆 𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒆𝒍𝒅𝒔 (Jake Shields) is still saying that Dan was a SEAL as recently as 𝑻𝑶𝑫𝑨𝒀. Dan has never finished his Navy SEAL program. He is currently enlisted in the Armenian Military as a reservist. 𝑷𝒐𝒌𝒆𝒓 𝑪𝒉𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒊𝒐𝒏: On Joe Rogan’s podcast, Dan claimed that he made all of his money from Poker. There is no evidence that Dan has won any major tournaments — there are essentially zero tournament winnings on record. In 2014 (in an interview with Kevin O’Leary) Dan claimed that he won $𝟏𝟎.𝟖 𝑴𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒐𝒏 in a single night playing against a billionaire. Dan has been asked for proof but allegedly has never provided any. 𝑫𝒂𝒏’𝒔 𝑻𝒓𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒔: Dan was allegedly given access to 2 separate Trust Funds. One at 30 years old and another at 35 years old. Dan claims he gave all of that money to his brother because he “didn’t need it, didn’t want it, didn’t care.” 𝑫𝒂𝒏’𝒔 𝑭𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒚: In interviews, Dan has claimed that he is not “super close” with his family and has never taken money from them. However, Dan’s father was allegedly heavily involved in running his “𝑰𝒈𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒆”company as an unpaid consultant. Dan allegedly approached the company’s shareholders and his father, complaining that he wasn’t happy with the direction the company was going. Dan’s father was convicted of Securities & Tax Law violations in 1989. The government claimed Paul Bilzerian allegedly hid assets in family trusts to avoid paying $62,000,000 in fines and back taxes. As of 2026, Paul Bilzerian allegedly owes $𝟏𝟖𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 to the government. 𝑳𝒂𝒘𝒔𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒔: Dan’s company allegedly 𝑰𝒈𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒆 faced multiple lawsuits from investors and former employees claiming fraud, mismanagement, and breach of contract. Dan has admitted in interviews that the company allegedly functioned as his own personal piggy bank to fund his lavish lifestyle. His LA mansion was allegedly $𝟐𝟎𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 per month in rent. Ignite allegedly burned through $𝟏𝟎𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 in just a few years and filed for bankruptcy in 2020. 𝑪𝒓𝒚𝒑𝒕𝒐: Dan has allegedly spearheaded multiple crypto projects — NFTs, memecoins, and other “investment opportunities” that have allegedly all failed. This led to Dan offering “lifestyle courses” online, which have allegedly been widely criticized as scams. (In this post, I have included clips from YouTube channels “JamesonsTravels,” “JamarisSpeaks,” and “Aeth-tv.”) 𝑫𝒂𝒏 𝒊𝒔 𝒂 𝒍𝒊𝒂𝒓.

NorCal Groyper

186,689 次观看 • 3 个月前

Today’s sermon is reserved for President Yoweri K Museveni and his colleagues in government like the @IGGBetiKamya who, by failing to fight corruption, are selling our country to debt-giving imperialists. They really are the true agents of imperialism and not activists like myself, Public Square and our comrades at Agora Discourse that they keep labeling this for fun. They’re the true “mistake makers”. See, Uganda’s budget has gone up from UGX. 52.7 trillion in FY 2023/24 to UGX. 72 trillion for FY 2024/25. Of this, the government projects that it will collect 32.3 trillion shillings, less than 45% of its own budget. This is voodoo economics. The gov’t plans to make up for this 55% shortfall by borrowing. The plan is to borrow about UGX 9 trillion from the domestic market, effectively starving local businesses, from which they plan to collect domestic taxes, of much needed financing. So, just over 12% of our budget will be borrowed locally. “Local” banks are really only local in name. The real owners are chilling in imperialist capitals, so even what they call domestic debt has mainly imperialist capital and the very few Ugandans who listen to Kakande Alex’s bonds gospel. The rest of our budget will either come from grants from imperialists but most importantly from foreign debt that our grand children will have to pay, for the right to live in a potholed, diseased country. Currently, our public debt is hovering above UGX 97 trillion and it would have been worse if imperialists didn’t at one time forgive our debt. By end of FY 2024/25, that imperialist agency, IMF projects that our public debt will be just under UGX 111 trillion. AND we are still digging. You’ll obviously hear some economists and talking heads in expensive suits come out to tell you that our debt to GDP ratio is still fine but don’t fall for that. It has inched higher than 53%. The World Bank’s benchmark for healthy debt is at 50%. Domestic interest payment to revenue ratio is at 16.3%, higher than the 12.5% benchmark. We are overachieving on the wrong indicators. To compound our misery, we have passed silly laws like the AHA which have meant that we can’t easily get external grants that used to shore up our economy. Add the Moody downgrade and you realize that we are gonna have to borrow at high interest rates to finance our corruption. “Corruption on a credit card” sounds like fiction. Not for our Uganda. In all this, the owners of our public debt; those imperialists our President loves to hate, are laughing all the way to the bank. The reason for this isn’t because of human rights activists and people calling for the end of corruption. Those just get cashless placards from EU in Uganda and threats of danger from the state. More on this in a later op-ed. The real agents of imperialism are the government officials who are mortgaging our collective future so they can finance their wanton greed. In medieval Europe, these would be roasted at the stake, for women and hanged if they were men. Here, we hand them heroes’ awards on June 9th.

Today’s sermon is reserved for President Yoweri K Museveni and his colleagues in government like the @IGGBetiKamya who, by failing to fight corruption, are selling our country to debt-giving imperialists. They really are the true agents of imperialism and not activists like myself, Public Square and our comrades at Agora Discourse that they keep labeling this for fun. They’re the true “mistake makers”. See, Uganda’s budget has gone up from UGX. 52.7 trillion in FY 2023/24 to UGX. 72 trillion for FY 2024/25. Of this, the government projects that it will collect 32.3 trillion shillings, less than 45% of its own budget. This is voodoo economics. The gov’t plans to make up for this 55% shortfall by borrowing. The plan is to borrow about UGX 9 trillion from the domestic market, effectively starving local businesses, from which they plan to collect domestic taxes, of much needed financing. So, just over 12% of our budget will be borrowed locally. “Local” banks are really only local in name. The real owners are chilling in imperialist capitals, so even what they call domestic debt has mainly imperialist capital and the very few Ugandans who listen to Kakande Alex’s bonds gospel. The rest of our budget will either come from grants from imperialists but most importantly from foreign debt that our grand children will have to pay, for the right to live in a potholed, diseased country. Currently, our public debt is hovering above UGX 97 trillion and it would have been worse if imperialists didn’t at one time forgive our debt. By end of FY 2024/25, that imperialist agency, IMF projects that our public debt will be just under UGX 111 trillion. AND we are still digging. You’ll obviously hear some economists and talking heads in expensive suits come out to tell you that our debt to GDP ratio is still fine but don’t fall for that. It has inched higher than 53%. The World Bank’s benchmark for healthy debt is at 50%. Domestic interest payment to revenue ratio is at 16.3%, higher than the 12.5% benchmark. We are overachieving on the wrong indicators. To compound our misery, we have passed silly laws like the AHA which have meant that we can’t easily get external grants that used to shore up our economy. Add the Moody downgrade and you realize that we are gonna have to borrow at high interest rates to finance our corruption. “Corruption on a credit card” sounds like fiction. Not for our Uganda. In all this, the owners of our public debt; those imperialists our President loves to hate, are laughing all the way to the bank. The reason for this isn’t because of human rights activists and people calling for the end of corruption. Those just get cashless placards from EU in Uganda and threats of danger from the state. More on this in a later op-ed. The real agents of imperialism are the government officials who are mortgaging our collective future so they can finance their wanton greed. In medieval Europe, these would be roasted at the stake, for women and hanged if they were men. Here, we hand them heroes’ awards on June 9th.

Anthony Natif

228,199 次观看 • 2 年前

Talking Again in 2025 I started eating again in 2024. After 11 years not eating a crumb of food or even drinking a drop of water. I got all fluids and nutrition from tubes inserted into my body. For 11 years. In 2025 I have another big improvement to announce. I have started ‼️ TALKING ‼️ again after 12 years of not saying a word to anyone! What will 2026 bring❓ Talking has been truly AMAZING. A slow process, it started when I slowly started feeling like I could talk again, but my stress response was still very high about it and it was hard to breach that stress wall and say the first words to someone. I first talked to my best friend, who I am really close with, comfortable with and feel very safe with so my stress levels are lower with her. I practiced talking to her on calls and video calls for about 6 months before talking to anyone else. Then I moved on with a few more close friends. It was hardest with my parents and caregiver because of the incredibly high stress I have been through with them in the past during my sickest years - my stress response seems to still be high with them - sensing danger likely due to a PTSD response mixed with the messed up fight or flight response in ME/CFS. But I am now talking to everyone! It is sooo much easier with my caregiver to just tell her what I need instead of pantomiming every little thing for sometimes a long time until she figures it out. What a relief! And I can have conversations with friends and loved ones! I just said goodbye to a lifelong friend who is dying and I got to talk to her on the phone and tell her how much she means to me, the impact she has had on my life, how wonderful she is; And then say goodbye. It was profoundly sad, but it meant the world to me that I got to talk to her and say goodbye at all. She is not online and does not text, so it would have been so devastating not to have that last connection with her… Read, watch or listen to the whole post on my blog! ================= ================= #mecfs #chronicillness #pwME #LongCovid #Disability

Talking Again in 2025 I started eating again in 2024. After 11 years not eating a crumb of food or even drinking a drop of water. I got all fluids and nutrition from tubes inserted into my body. For 11 years. In 2025 I have another big improvement to announce. I have started ‼️ TALKING ‼️ again after 12 years of not saying a word to anyone! What will 2026 bring❓ Talking has been truly AMAZING. A slow process, it started when I slowly started feeling like I could talk again, but my stress response was still very high about it and it was hard to breach that stress wall and say the first words to someone. I first talked to my best friend, who I am really close with, comfortable with and feel very safe with so my stress levels are lower with her. I practiced talking to her on calls and video calls for about 6 months before talking to anyone else. Then I moved on with a few more close friends. It was hardest with my parents and caregiver because of the incredibly high stress I have been through with them in the past during my sickest years - my stress response seems to still be high with them - sensing danger likely due to a PTSD response mixed with the messed up fight or flight response in ME/CFS. But I am now talking to everyone! It is sooo much easier with my caregiver to just tell her what I need instead of pantomiming every little thing for sometimes a long time until she figures it out. What a relief! And I can have conversations with friends and loved ones! I just said goodbye to a lifelong friend who is dying and I got to talk to her on the phone and tell her how much she means to me, the impact she has had on my life, how wonderful she is; And then say goodbye. It was profoundly sad, but it meant the world to me that I got to talk to her and say goodbye at all. She is not online and does not text, so it would have been so devastating not to have that last connection with her… Read, watch or listen to the whole post on my blog! ================= ================= #mecfs #chronicillness #pwME #LongCovid #Disability

Whitney Dafoe

256,594 次观看 • 8 个月前

Jersey City, we promised to always be honest with you—even when the news is hard. Today, we're keeping that promise. After weeks of working with outside financial experts, we can now share the full picture of our city's finances. The truth is serious: Jersey City faces a structural budget deficit of approximately $250 million. That's roughly 28% of our entire operating budget—one of every three dollars we need to keep our city running. This crisis didn't happen by accident. It was built through years of deliberate choices that prioritized short-term political wins over our city's long-term financial health: -> By 2023, nearly 26% of city revenue came from one-time gimmicks—property sales, depleted reserves, emergency borrowing—that can't be repeated -> $20 million was spent on consultants for a museum that was never built -> Over $3 million in overpaid taxes that they for forgot to get back -> Health insurance was underbudgeted by over $34 million in 2025 alone -> Six union contracts expired with no money set aside for back pay -> The city's reserves—our rainy day fund—are essentially gone -> All three credit rating agencies have downgraded Jersey City in recent years We didn't create this problem. But we're not going to hide from it either. Our approach going forward is guided by four principles: (1) Tell the truth—always. (2) Lead by example—no more vanity projects. (3) Protect working families. (4) Find real solutions—no tricks or gimmicks. The full budget report is now available at We've also created a video that explains exactly how we got here and what comes next. This will be hard. But Jersey City has faced hard things before—and we've always come through when we faced them honestly, together. No spin. No tricks. Just the truth.

Jersey City, we promised to always be honest with you—even when the news is hard. Today, we're keeping that promise. After weeks of working with outside financial experts, we can now share the full picture of our city's finances. The truth is serious: Jersey City faces a structural budget deficit of approximately $250 million. That's roughly 28% of our entire operating budget—one of every three dollars we need to keep our city running. This crisis didn't happen by accident. It was built through years of deliberate choices that prioritized short-term political wins over our city's long-term financial health: -> By 2023, nearly 26% of city revenue came from one-time gimmicks—property sales, depleted reserves, emergency borrowing—that can't be repeated -> $20 million was spent on consultants for a museum that was never built -> Over $3 million in overpaid taxes that they for forgot to get back -> Health insurance was underbudgeted by over $34 million in 2025 alone -> Six union contracts expired with no money set aside for back pay -> The city's reserves—our rainy day fund—are essentially gone -> All three credit rating agencies have downgraded Jersey City in recent years We didn't create this problem. But we're not going to hide from it either. Our approach going forward is guided by four principles: (1) Tell the truth—always. (2) Lead by example—no more vanity projects. (3) Protect working families. (4) Find real solutions—no tricks or gimmicks. The full budget report is now available at We've also created a video that explains exactly how we got here and what comes next. This will be hard. But Jersey City has faced hard things before—and we've always come through when we faced them honestly, together. No spin. No tricks. Just the truth.

James Solomon

213,809 次观看 • 6 个月前

Board Certified Emergency Medicine ER Director of 20+ Years who’s Chief of Staff says Hospitals are colluding with Health Insurance companies and Big Pharma to give the impression they’re broke by creating fake balance sheets and using additional scams “Hospitals want us to believe they're broke — I have a lot of experience with this and the reality is very different. Do you realize that hospital care consumes more than 30% of our healthcare spending? Yes, out of every dollar we spend, 32 cents goes to hospitals. So how do they convince everyone they're broke?” - By creating balance sheets that are essentially works of fiction using every legal and sometimes not so legal accounting trick - The uncompensated care and IT projects they pretend are draining their money are actually already baked into the expenses. They don't come out of profit. And there is so much more - The 340B drug hustle (This is a government funded program hospitals are scamming and exploiting) - The management fee magic trick - The fake balance sheet losses - The investment income, donations and grants that vanish from operating profit (This is a MASSIVE scam, similar to NGOs) - The billions in tax breaks nonprofit hospitals receive and probably the biggest scam - The bloated administrative costs and the obscene seven figure CEO salaries “All while they preach austerity and cutbacks to staff providing actual patient care. Yes, a few rural hospitals are truly struggling, but the majority are just pretending to be broke while colluding with insurance companies and big pharma to drain us all dry. They are the reason our national debt is exploding — They're not victims. They're just professional beggars with luxury tastes”

Board Certified Emergency Medicine ER Director of 20+ Years who’s Chief of Staff says Hospitals are colluding with Health Insurance companies and Big Pharma to give the impression they’re broke by creating fake balance sheets and using additional scams “Hospitals want us to believe they're broke — I have a lot of experience with this and the reality is very different. Do you realize that hospital care consumes more than 30% of our healthcare spending? Yes, out of every dollar we spend, 32 cents goes to hospitals. So how do they convince everyone they're broke?” - By creating balance sheets that are essentially works of fiction using every legal and sometimes not so legal accounting trick - The uncompensated care and IT projects they pretend are draining their money are actually already baked into the expenses. They don't come out of profit. And there is so much more - The 340B drug hustle (This is a government funded program hospitals are scamming and exploiting) - The management fee magic trick - The fake balance sheet losses - The investment income, donations and grants that vanish from operating profit (This is a MASSIVE scam, similar to NGOs) - The billions in tax breaks nonprofit hospitals receive and probably the biggest scam - The bloated administrative costs and the obscene seven figure CEO salaries “All while they preach austerity and cutbacks to staff providing actual patient care. Yes, a few rural hospitals are truly struggling, but the majority are just pretending to be broke while colluding with insurance companies and big pharma to drain us all dry. They are the reason our national debt is exploding — They're not victims. They're just professional beggars with luxury tastes”

Wall Street Apes

63,071 次观看 • 1 年前

Since the start of the full-scale invasion, Russia has been increasing its war spending every year. In the 2026 budget, the Kremlin plans to spend 12.93 trillion rubles ($163,4 billion) (almost 30%, a record since the Soviet era) on the war, the army, and weapons purchases. This rapid growth in spending is happening without an adequate revenue base. The Russian economy has rested on three main pillars: energy exports, gold and foreign exchange reserves, and the National Wealth Fund. ◾️ Oil and gas revenues account for about 25% of Russia's budget and are the main source of funding for the war against Ukraine. As of mid-December, prices for Russian Urals crude are at their lowest level since the start of the full-scale war, at just over $40 per barrel. In February 2022, Urals prices were in the range of $80-90 per barrel. ◾️ Russia's National Wealth Fund is rapidly losing liquid assets: from $113.5 billion in 2022 to $51.6 billion in 2025. It was used to finance the budget deficit, especially in 2022-2024. ◾️ Gold and foreign exchange reserves - at the end of November, according to Ukraine's Foreign Intelligence Service, in order to quickly patch up holes in the budget and support the ruble exchange rate, Russia's Central Bank began selling strategic gold reserves. The sale is taking place on the domestic market. Access to foreign markets is blocked by sanctions. In fact, Russia is "eating through" reserves that for decades were considered untouchable. ◾️ Even the Russian media are now openly writing about the possibility of the Russian economy entering a phase of stagnation. According to experts, the 1% GDP growth projected by the economic development ministry for 2025 will most likely not be achieved. Declines in industrial output have been recorded across all civilian sectors of the Russian economy. According to the latest data, there has even been a decline in production in the military sector, despite government contracts and financial backing from the budget. ◾️ Due to sanctions restrictions, declining international trust, and high risks, Russia has extremely limited access to external loans. There is little reason to expect a rise in energy prices. Therefore, social programs are being cut, payments to contract soldiers are being reduced, and further emissions and tax increases are being implemented. 🔷 From January 1, 2026, the VAT rate will increase from 20% to 22% - the highest level in Russia since 1992. 🔷 A radical tax reform for small businesses has been approved, affecting not only hundreds of thousands of entrepreneurs but also millions of their customers. 🔷 A law introducing a "technology levy" has been signed - a tax on equipment and electronics sold in Russian stores. However, even the usually reserved head of the Central Bank, Elvira Nabiullina, speaks bluntly - due to tariff and VAT increases in early 2026, the Russian economy will experience an acceleration of inflation. "In December, certain companies have already begun adjusting prices with this in mind, but the main impact is yet to come," she said. For now, the Kremlin is doing everything it can to sustain military spending, which it considers a priority. But the Russian economy may not be able to withstand the continuation of the hot phase of the war. Especially if sanctions are tightened further.

Since the start of the full-scale invasion, Russia has been increasing its war spending every year. In the 2026 budget, the Kremlin plans to spend 12.93 trillion rubles ($163,4 billion) (almost 30%, a record since the Soviet era) on the war, the army, and weapons purchases. This rapid growth in spending is happening without an adequate revenue base. The Russian economy has rested on three main pillars: energy exports, gold and foreign exchange reserves, and the National Wealth Fund. ◾️ Oil and gas revenues account for about 25% of Russia's budget and are the main source of funding for the war against Ukraine. As of mid-December, prices for Russian Urals crude are at their lowest level since the start of the full-scale war, at just over $40 per barrel. In February 2022, Urals prices were in the range of $80-90 per barrel. ◾️ Russia's National Wealth Fund is rapidly losing liquid assets: from $113.5 billion in 2022 to $51.6 billion in 2025. It was used to finance the budget deficit, especially in 2022-2024. ◾️ Gold and foreign exchange reserves - at the end of November, according to Ukraine's Foreign Intelligence Service, in order to quickly patch up holes in the budget and support the ruble exchange rate, Russia's Central Bank began selling strategic gold reserves. The sale is taking place on the domestic market. Access to foreign markets is blocked by sanctions. In fact, Russia is "eating through" reserves that for decades were considered untouchable. ◾️ Even the Russian media are now openly writing about the possibility of the Russian economy entering a phase of stagnation. According to experts, the 1% GDP growth projected by the economic development ministry for 2025 will most likely not be achieved. Declines in industrial output have been recorded across all civilian sectors of the Russian economy. According to the latest data, there has even been a decline in production in the military sector, despite government contracts and financial backing from the budget. ◾️ Due to sanctions restrictions, declining international trust, and high risks, Russia has extremely limited access to external loans. There is little reason to expect a rise in energy prices. Therefore, social programs are being cut, payments to contract soldiers are being reduced, and further emissions and tax increases are being implemented. 🔷 From January 1, 2026, the VAT rate will increase from 20% to 22% - the highest level in Russia since 1992. 🔷 A radical tax reform for small businesses has been approved, affecting not only hundreds of thousands of entrepreneurs but also millions of their customers. 🔷 A law introducing a "technology levy" has been signed - a tax on equipment and electronics sold in Russian stores. However, even the usually reserved head of the Central Bank, Elvira Nabiullina, speaks bluntly - due to tariff and VAT increases in early 2026, the Russian economy will experience an acceleration of inflation. "In December, certain companies have already begun adjusting prices with this in mind, but the main impact is yet to come," she said. For now, the Kremlin is doing everything it can to sustain military spending, which it considers a priority. But the Russian economy may not be able to withstand the continuation of the hot phase of the war. Especially if sanctions are tightened further.

Anton Gerashchenko

122,875 次观看 • 8 个月前

⃤ Video of a Black Triangle - What's the Frequency, Gerry? ⃤ "A very clear visual representation of what was on the radar. It resembled a very black, triangular or delta shape to it" "It was always slightly out of focus for some reason." "Garry Nolan told us to watch for the cloud formations." (If you scroll down to the bottom, I'll tell you the exact time stamps for each the UAP videos that were shown.) "We believe [it's NHI]. Either that or some very sophisticated technology that maybe we're reverse engineering." "There was a specific electronic signature (frequency) emanating from them when they were going into or coming out of the water, so they were easy to track." ~Bob Fish ~ Gerry Tedesco: August 29th, "we were in the RV, running tests on our equipment because we was planning on going out that weekend." John Tedesco: "And we noticed that we had a signature (on their spectrum analyzer) there that was well presented, very unusual for the area. And we kind of collaborated that with some radar data. Radar seemed to align with what we had on the spectrum analyzer. The object, we believe, was over the water at that point, simply because of the distance that we were able to capture it on the radar. It presented in a cloud layer, exited a cloud layer, produced a signature." Gerry; "This was a single thunderstorm cloud in the sky and the weather was great. We had cumulous clouds out there, mostly clear. And this was a dark, cumulonimbus cloud. It was a very dark thunderstorm cloud, and it looked out a place. " Ross Coulthart: "Do you think that that cloud might have been a fake cloud?" Donna Lee Nardo: "So Garry P. Nolan, he came out with us for our field study one night. He told us, Watch for the cloud formations.' And John, Gerry, and I saw one really nasty-looking...it looked like 10 motherships situated...oriented north to south, one night when we were doing the field study. And I believe this was early on in 2022. And it also was a clear night, but it just looked out of place. It was dark, yet there were lighted portions. But it was just so humongous. And we always remember that Garry had said, look at the cloud formations." Gerry: "Yeah, we definitely had some oddities out there." Coulthart: "I've had people, multiple people have sent me imagery. There's quite famous ones on YouTube where you see what looks like a cloud, and it's shaped just ever so slightly like a disc or a craft. And it's got the fluffy edges of a cloud, and then it suddenly maneuvers and just moves away. And I sometimes wonder whether something or someone is using clouds as a form of stealth or signature management." Gerry: "That's a possibility. We look at that, we look to see if it is a cloud. We use shortwave infrared, which does pick up moisture. And it'll actually differentiate the precipitation in a cloud, or moisture in a cloud, so we know it is a real cloud." Coulhart: "Did you do that with this cloud that night?" John: "Exactly, exactly. And this is something that we could determine that there wasn't moisture content." Coulthart: "So you were able to show it wasn't a classic cumulonimbus cloud, even though it looked like one." John: "No, no. Yeah, and the object was well hidden for a short period of time. Actually, relatively long period of time before it emerged from the cloud body." Coulthart: "So Donna is probably right: This is probably some kind of intelligent stealth management by something." Gerry: "It's a possibility." Donna: "Possibly." John: "It could very well be." (I like how all three will only go as far as, Possible and Could be.) Coulthart: "This is where it gets really interesting. Talk me through what happens next. " Gerry: "Okay, so we watched an object emerge from the cloud on radar. John and I quickly went to get our binoculars, we have what's called Vortex binoculars. These are high-end binoculars, great optical glass. John had began looking at the cloud with those, and he told me, we both went outside. I was trying to find one of the other cameras, scrambling, trying to get one of the other cameras going. "And John said, 'There's a black object moving between the cloud.' And then it was emerging from the cloud. So I grabbed my cell phone and videotaped it. While John was looking at them, we switched. And what we saw was something...originally it resembled a very black, triangular or delta shape to it, or bell shape to it. It had that Delta shape, or triangular shape." Coulthart: "And was this showing up on radar at this stage, that delta shape?" Gerry: "Yes." John: "Yes." Coulthart: "Wow!" John: "Yes, we did have a radar target." Gerry: "We tracked it on radar. On radar, it appears to separate into two more objects, which is quite interesting." Coulthart: "You found something interesting in the frequency, and you can't talk about it, can you? Has the FBI asked you, not to talk about it?" Gerry: "Yes, that's the sensitive part. There was quite a bit of interesting signals, but that goes into signals intelligence, which we can't talk about." Coulthart: "Just let me guess. 1.6 by any chance?" (They all laugh) Donna: "You've been talking to people." Gerry: "No comment." Coulthart: "No, it just fascinates me. Is it 1.6 gigahertz, or megahertz? I'm trying to remember." John: "It's gigahertz. Yeah, I know with Skinwalker Ranch, I know the one, 1.6 seems to come up quite a bit. There's also a three-gigahertz signal, supposedly." Gerry: "There's a few others, too. We'll leave it at that." Coulthart: "No, but it's interesting. It's such a consistent thing, and I'm really interested because all around the world, people are contacting me, talking about 1.6, in particular, but also about three gigahertz. And nobody's explaining it. But often it's an indicator." ~~~From My Bob Fish Blog~~~ Bob Fish: "In that same TS/SCI building cafeteria in El Segundo, I had lunch with a senior USAF NCO who had worked for Project Blue Book in the 1970s (after it had been 'officially disbanded'). He was an ELINT technician (electronic intelligence) who flew in RC-135s from MacDill AFB in Florida. The 'normal' target was Cuba where they did lots of snooping and sometimes challenging the Cubans to turn on radar and other systems. "He said there were times when they were diverted from these missions to track UFOs off the east coast of Florida. His claim was that UFOs had a landing and takeoff spot in the ocean east of Miami, north of Bermuda. He also claimed there was a specific electronic signature (frequency) emanating from them when they were going into or coming out of the water, so they were easy to track. On several occasions they filmed the UFO as it transitioned from water to air or vice versa. High quality film of UFOs is 'out there' somewhere!" (What was the signature? 1.6 gigahertz? 3.0?) ~~~End Bob Fish Excerpt~~~ Coulthart: "And as you say - without giving away the frequency that you detected - you detected a frequency anomaly on your spectrum analyzer. You saw it there. Then you got it on your radar. And then when you visually observed it with the binoculars, the vortex binoculars, you then corroborated that object on the radar as well. So you've got four separate data points to corroborate something anomalous." John: "And a very, very clear visual representation of what was on the radar. The interesting thing I will say that we had observed flights of commercial aircraft at the same time through these lenses, these very clear lenses that we use. The commercial aircraft was extremely detailed, in focus. You can even make out the writing on the on the aircraft. The object itself? No." Gerry: "It was always slightly out of focus for some reason." John: "It was poorly presented." Coulthart: "And you gents would understand, and I'm sure Donna as well, that the Alcubierre-drive principles. That, essentially, if something is coming, if it's warping space time, there's allegedly some kind of plasma or some kind of distortion field around the object. Do you think that might explain what you were seeing? Gerry: That's a possibility." John: "That's a very strong possibility." Gerry: "It's something we're looking into. There was also, there was a shimmer around it. Definitely a possibility of some kind of field effect around it." ~~~ Time Stamps Extremely bright, luminous sphere over the ocean. Not visible to the naked eye. - 13:33 The Black Triangle - 33:31 Orb-Like Object Over Land in Farmingville, N.Y. (Where my sister lives) ~ 58:18 Similar to what @MeaganOurada saw - 1:14:05

⃤ Video of a Black Triangle - What's the Frequency, Gerry? ⃤ "A very clear visual representation of what was on the radar. It resembled a very black, triangular or delta shape to it" "It was always slightly out of focus for some reason." "Garry Nolan told us to watch for the cloud formations." (If you scroll down to the bottom, I'll tell you the exact time stamps for each the UAP videos that were shown.) "We believe [it's NHI]. Either that or some very sophisticated technology that maybe we're reverse engineering." "There was a specific electronic signature (frequency) emanating from them when they were going into or coming out of the water, so they were easy to track." ~Bob Fish ~ Gerry Tedesco: August 29th, "we were in the RV, running tests on our equipment because we was planning on going out that weekend." John Tedesco: "And we noticed that we had a signature (on their spectrum analyzer) there that was well presented, very unusual for the area. And we kind of collaborated that with some radar data. Radar seemed to align with what we had on the spectrum analyzer. The object, we believe, was over the water at that point, simply because of the distance that we were able to capture it on the radar. It presented in a cloud layer, exited a cloud layer, produced a signature." Gerry; "This was a single thunderstorm cloud in the sky and the weather was great. We had cumulous clouds out there, mostly clear. And this was a dark, cumulonimbus cloud. It was a very dark thunderstorm cloud, and it looked out a place. " Ross Coulthart: "Do you think that that cloud might have been a fake cloud?" Donna Lee Nardo: "So Garry P. Nolan, he came out with us for our field study one night. He told us, Watch for the cloud formations.' And John, Gerry, and I saw one really nasty-looking...it looked like 10 motherships situated...oriented north to south, one night when we were doing the field study. And I believe this was early on in 2022. And it also was a clear night, but it just looked out of place. It was dark, yet there were lighted portions. But it was just so humongous. And we always remember that Garry had said, look at the cloud formations." Gerry: "Yeah, we definitely had some oddities out there." Coulthart: "I've had people, multiple people have sent me imagery. There's quite famous ones on YouTube where you see what looks like a cloud, and it's shaped just ever so slightly like a disc or a craft. And it's got the fluffy edges of a cloud, and then it suddenly maneuvers and just moves away. And I sometimes wonder whether something or someone is using clouds as a form of stealth or signature management." Gerry: "That's a possibility. We look at that, we look to see if it is a cloud. We use shortwave infrared, which does pick up moisture. And it'll actually differentiate the precipitation in a cloud, or moisture in a cloud, so we know it is a real cloud." Coulhart: "Did you do that with this cloud that night?" John: "Exactly, exactly. And this is something that we could determine that there wasn't moisture content." Coulthart: "So you were able to show it wasn't a classic cumulonimbus cloud, even though it looked like one." John: "No, no. Yeah, and the object was well hidden for a short period of time. Actually, relatively long period of time before it emerged from the cloud body." Coulthart: "So Donna is probably right: This is probably some kind of intelligent stealth management by something." Gerry: "It's a possibility." Donna: "Possibly." John: "It could very well be." (I like how all three will only go as far as, Possible and Could be.) Coulthart: "This is where it gets really interesting. Talk me through what happens next. " Gerry: "Okay, so we watched an object emerge from the cloud on radar. John and I quickly went to get our binoculars, we have what's called Vortex binoculars. These are high-end binoculars, great optical glass. John had began looking at the cloud with those, and he told me, we both went outside. I was trying to find one of the other cameras, scrambling, trying to get one of the other cameras going. "And John said, 'There's a black object moving between the cloud.' And then it was emerging from the cloud. So I grabbed my cell phone and videotaped it. While John was looking at them, we switched. And what we saw was something...originally it resembled a very black, triangular or delta shape to it, or bell shape to it. It had that Delta shape, or triangular shape." Coulthart: "And was this showing up on radar at this stage, that delta shape?" Gerry: "Yes." John: "Yes." Coulthart: "Wow!" John: "Yes, we did have a radar target." Gerry: "We tracked it on radar. On radar, it appears to separate into two more objects, which is quite interesting." Coulthart: "You found something interesting in the frequency, and you can't talk about it, can you? Has the FBI asked you, not to talk about it?" Gerry: "Yes, that's the sensitive part. There was quite a bit of interesting signals, but that goes into signals intelligence, which we can't talk about." Coulthart: "Just let me guess. 1.6 by any chance?" (They all laugh) Donna: "You've been talking to people." Gerry: "No comment." Coulthart: "No, it just fascinates me. Is it 1.6 gigahertz, or megahertz? I'm trying to remember." John: "It's gigahertz. Yeah, I know with Skinwalker Ranch, I know the one, 1.6 seems to come up quite a bit. There's also a three-gigahertz signal, supposedly." Gerry: "There's a few others, too. We'll leave it at that." Coulthart: "No, but it's interesting. It's such a consistent thing, and I'm really interested because all around the world, people are contacting me, talking about 1.6, in particular, but also about three gigahertz. And nobody's explaining it. But often it's an indicator." ~From My Bob Fish Blog~ Bob Fish: "In that same TS/SCI building cafeteria in El Segundo, I had lunch with a senior USAF NCO who had worked for Project Blue Book in the 1970s (after it had been 'officially disbanded'). He was an ELINT technician (electronic intelligence) who flew in RC-135s from MacDill AFB in Florida. The 'normal' target was Cuba where they did lots of snooping and sometimes challenging the Cubans to turn on radar and other systems. "He said there were times when they were diverted from these missions to track UFOs off the east coast of Florida. His claim was that UFOs had a landing and takeoff spot in the ocean east of Miami, north of Bermuda. He also claimed there was a specific electronic signature (frequency) emanating from them when they were going into or coming out of the water, so they were easy to track. On several occasions they filmed the UFO as it transitioned from water to air or vice versa. High quality film of UFOs is 'out there' somewhere!" (What was the signature? 1.6 gigahertz? 3.0?) ~End Bob Fish Excerpt~ Coulthart: "And as you say - without giving away the frequency that you detected - you detected a frequency anomaly on your spectrum analyzer. You saw it there. Then you got it on your radar. And then when you visually observed it with the binoculars, the vortex binoculars, you then corroborated that object on the radar as well. So you've got four separate data points to corroborate something anomalous." John: "And a very, very clear visual representation of what was on the radar. The interesting thing I will say that we had observed flights of commercial aircraft at the same time through these lenses, these very clear lenses that we use. The commercial aircraft was extremely detailed, in focus. You can even make out the writing on the on the aircraft. The object itself? No." Gerry: "It was always slightly out of focus for some reason." John: "It was poorly presented." Coulthart: "And you gents would understand, and I'm sure Donna as well, that the Alcubierre-drive principles. That, essentially, if something is coming, if it's warping space time, there's allegedly some kind of plasma or some kind of distortion field around the object. Do you think that might explain what you were seeing? Gerry: That's a possibility." John: "That's a very strong possibility." Gerry: "It's something we're looking into. There was also, there was a shimmer around it. Definitely a possibility of some kind of field effect around it." ~~~ Time Stamps Extremely bright, luminous sphere over the ocean. Not visible to the naked eye. - 13:33 The Black Triangle - 33:31 Orb-Like Object Over Land in Farmingville, N.Y. (Where my sister lives) ~ 58:18 Similar to what @MeaganOurada saw - 1:14:05

Joe Murgia

14,232 次观看 • 9 个月前

𝗗𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗵𝗮𝗿 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗮 𝗪𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗢𝗩 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗿𝗲 (𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄) First of all, this is not your YRF spy universe thriller with extra CGI where ISI And RAW agents will dance together to save the world from Pak terrorists 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴: Dhar constructed Karachi of the 90s in 6-acre area in Thailand and it feels so real, raw and gritty... the houses feel lived in. The streets walked upon, and the air has a smell that you can sense (Or maybe it is the smell of the theatre). 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆: Fiction interspersed with Real events of Kandahar hijack, Parliament att@ck and 26/11 keeps you grounded, and you never lose the sight of why this is not just a regular gangster drama and actually a Spy thriller with Gangster backdrop. 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗰 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗕𝗚𝗠: Highlight of the movie. It could have easily spoiled the movie, but Shashwat Sachdev is brilliant in mixing the right amount of retro songs, hip hops, raps beats and at times only bagpipes to keep you hooked to the screen. 𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴: Superlative. The film is 3 hours 34 min long, but the editing is so sharp that you never feel bored or have time to check your phone... every scene is important for the story, and nothing feels overdone or extra cooked. 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀: This is the strength of the writing to create character with rich backstory, ample amount of time to develop on screen and each character comes with a motive. Each character is either grey or black except the female lead who is shown as naive and kiddish due to her age which is also important for the story. 𝗖𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴: The casting of even minor character is top class and that says a lot about the whole cast that has some big names. 𝗖𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵𝘆: The settings are so real, but it is the camera work that brings the alive on screen. The first shot of the movie where a plane is parked in the midst of mountains in Kandahar and Madhvan is standing alone outside smoking... waiting for the minister to arrive to rescue hostages... That scene is breathtaking and surreal. 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: Raw, real and brutal and necessary for the world that Dhar has created. The choreography is impeccable... you feel every kick, every punch from the screen. The stunt team is brilliant. 𝗗𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: Now you have all the ingredients and money, but you can still make a mess of it if the director is clueless (eg War2), but Dhar shows why he is one of the best when it comes to an action thriller like this. 𝗡𝗼𝘄 𝗜 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲... if Dhar can make a movie that looks this and that it is shot in real settings in just 280 Crore then why War 2 with a budget of 400 crore looks so artificial and lifeless. Same for Tiger 3 that had a budget of 300 Crore. Anyways... like I said this is not a review. 𝗕𝗮𝗮𝗸𝗶 𝗚𝗮𝗮𝗻𝗮 𝘀𝘂𝗻𝗼... 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗶. 2025's Jamal Kodu. #Dhurandhar #DhurandharReview #Movie

𝗗𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗵𝗮𝗿 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗮 𝗪𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗢𝗩 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗿𝗲 (𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄) First of all, this is not your YRF spy universe thriller with extra CGI where ISI And RAW agents will dance together to save the world from Pak terrorists 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴: Dhar constructed Karachi of the 90s in 6-acre area in Thailand and it feels so real, raw and gritty... the houses feel lived in. The streets walked upon, and the air has a smell that you can sense (Or maybe it is the smell of the theatre). 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆: Fiction interspersed with Real events of Kandahar hijack, Parliament att@ck and 26/11 keeps you grounded, and you never lose the sight of why this is not just a regular gangster drama and actually a Spy thriller with Gangster backdrop. 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗰 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗕𝗚𝗠: Highlight of the movie. It could have easily spoiled the movie, but Shashwat Sachdev is brilliant in mixing the right amount of retro songs, hip hops, raps beats and at times only bagpipes to keep you hooked to the screen. 𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴: Superlative. The film is 3 hours 34 min long, but the editing is so sharp that you never feel bored or have time to check your phone... every scene is important for the story, and nothing feels overdone or extra cooked. 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀: This is the strength of the writing to create character with rich backstory, ample amount of time to develop on screen and each character comes with a motive. Each character is either grey or black except the female lead who is shown as naive and kiddish due to her age which is also important for the story. 𝗖𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴: The casting of even minor character is top class and that says a lot about the whole cast that has some big names. 𝗖𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵𝘆: The settings are so real, but it is the camera work that brings the alive on screen. The first shot of the movie where a plane is parked in the midst of mountains in Kandahar and Madhvan is standing alone outside smoking... waiting for the minister to arrive to rescue hostages... That scene is breathtaking and surreal. 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: Raw, real and brutal and necessary for the world that Dhar has created. The choreography is impeccable... you feel every kick, every punch from the screen. The stunt team is brilliant. 𝗗𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: Now you have all the ingredients and money, but you can still make a mess of it if the director is clueless (eg War2), but Dhar shows why he is one of the best when it comes to an action thriller like this. 𝗡𝗼𝘄 𝗜 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲... if Dhar can make a movie that looks this and that it is shot in real settings in just 280 Crore then why War 2 with a budget of 400 crore looks so artificial and lifeless. Same for Tiger 3 that had a budget of 300 Crore. Anyways... like I said this is not a review. 𝗕𝗮𝗮𝗸𝗶 𝗚𝗮𝗮𝗻𝗮 𝘀𝘂𝗻𝗼... 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗶. 2025's Jamal Kodu. #Dhurandhar #DhurandharReview #Movie

Ankit Uttam

392,492 次观看 • 8 个月前

My colleague from South Dakota suggests here that the talking filibuster hasn’t been used in a century, and that it was not used to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He’s mistaken. As I’ve explained to the entire Senate GOP on multiple occasions, the talking filibuster *was* used effectively to break the weeks-long filibuster mounted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Leader Thune and others point out that the Senate ultimately invoked cloture on the Civil Rights Act, and on that basis wrongly conclude that the talking filibuster was *not* the tool used to achieve that victory. This argument ignores the fact that this is *how* the Senate closed a staggering 30-vote cloture deficit in 1964. After many weeks of fighting a losing battle, filibustering senators predictably started to lose their resolve to hold up the bill indefinitely, especially when they realized how hard they’d have to work to keep the effort alive. So they started proposing and supporting amendments to the bill to make it more palatable and help them save face. I still maintain that this is a viable approach that could work well—even better—in the context of the SAVE America Act, especially considering that the bill is less complicated and less controversial with voters than was the Civil Rights Act, and currently has a cloture deficit of only 10 votes—tiny compared to the 30-vote deficit faced by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. My colleague also mistakenly suggests that Senate Republicans would have to vote to enforce the talking filibuster. That simply isn’t true; no vote is required for this step. All we need is a majority leader willing to announce that we’re getting on the bill and that we will continue to debate it until it passes—all with the understanding that if filibustering senators fail to show up to debate it, we can “call the question” and pass it with a simple majority. That understanding, in turn, is what motivates the filibustering senators to show up and speak, but it’s also what naturally causes them to tire of the exercise after a few weeks, at which point they start looking for a face-saving off-ramp. Finally, Leader Thune suggests that the talking filibuster would be thwarted by being “reset” every time Democrats offered an amendment. There’s a valid point in there, but it’s not a good reason not to invoke the talking filibuster. It appears he’s referring indirectly to paragraph 1(a) of Senate Rule 19 (the two-speech rule). While offering a new amendment can create a new question under longstanding practice, the September 25, 1986 precedent narrowed how rigidly the two-speech rule is applied by clarifying that many procedural actions do not count as speeches at all. Particularly in light of that 1986 clarification, it’s been a long time since I’ve suggested we consider rigid enforcement of Rule 19’s two-speech limit as part of a talking filibuster strategy for the SAVE America Act. We don’t need it! Nor was that rule aggressively enforced during the Senate’s consideration of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Majority Leader Mike Mansfield correctly focused on requiring actual debate from filibustering senators rather than looking for technical ways to shut the debate down. To give credit where it’s due, I appreciate what Leader Thune said in this interview about the possibility of passing some iteration of SAVE America using budget reconciliation—a procedure in which there is no 60-vote cloture hurdle. I’ve been skeptical of this approach in the past, but I’m starting to believe the SAVE America Act has more budgetary features than I initially considered possible. That said, reconciliation is fraught with all kinds of problems, challenges, risks, and uncertainties. Also, failure can be far too easy to blame on the parliamentarian. I’m open to considering the reconciliation path, but we should make this decision with our eyes open. To do that, we need to separate fact from fiction when it comes to the talking filibuster.

My colleague from South Dakota suggests here that the talking filibuster hasn’t been used in a century, and that it was not used to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He’s mistaken. As I’ve explained to the entire Senate GOP on multiple occasions, the talking filibuster was used effectively to break the weeks-long filibuster mounted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Leader Thune and others point out that the Senate ultimately invoked cloture on the Civil Rights Act, and on that basis wrongly conclude that the talking filibuster was not the tool used to achieve that victory. This argument ignores the fact that this is how the Senate closed a staggering 30-vote cloture deficit in 1964. After many weeks of fighting a losing battle, filibustering senators predictably started to lose their resolve to hold up the bill indefinitely, especially when they realized how hard they’d have to work to keep the effort alive. So they started proposing and supporting amendments to the bill to make it more palatable and help them save face. I still maintain that this is a viable approach that could work well—even better—in the context of the SAVE America Act, especially considering that the bill is less complicated and less controversial with voters than was the Civil Rights Act, and currently has a cloture deficit of only 10 votes—tiny compared to the 30-vote deficit faced by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. My colleague also mistakenly suggests that Senate Republicans would have to vote to enforce the talking filibuster. That simply isn’t true; no vote is required for this step. All we need is a majority leader willing to announce that we’re getting on the bill and that we will continue to debate it until it passes—all with the understanding that if filibustering senators fail to show up to debate it, we can “call the question” and pass it with a simple majority. That understanding, in turn, is what motivates the filibustering senators to show up and speak, but it’s also what naturally causes them to tire of the exercise after a few weeks, at which point they start looking for a face-saving off-ramp. Finally, Leader Thune suggests that the talking filibuster would be thwarted by being “reset” every time Democrats offered an amendment. There’s a valid point in there, but it’s not a good reason not to invoke the talking filibuster. It appears he’s referring indirectly to paragraph 1(a) of Senate Rule 19 (the two-speech rule). While offering a new amendment can create a new question under longstanding practice, the September 25, 1986 precedent narrowed how rigidly the two-speech rule is applied by clarifying that many procedural actions do not count as speeches at all. Particularly in light of that 1986 clarification, it’s been a long time since I’ve suggested we consider rigid enforcement of Rule 19’s two-speech limit as part of a talking filibuster strategy for the SAVE America Act. We don’t need it! Nor was that rule aggressively enforced during the Senate’s consideration of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Majority Leader Mike Mansfield correctly focused on requiring actual debate from filibustering senators rather than looking for technical ways to shut the debate down. To give credit where it’s due, I appreciate what Leader Thune said in this interview about the possibility of passing some iteration of SAVE America using budget reconciliation—a procedure in which there is no 60-vote cloture hurdle. I’ve been skeptical of this approach in the past, but I’m starting to believe the SAVE America Act has more budgetary features than I initially considered possible. That said, reconciliation is fraught with all kinds of problems, challenges, risks, and uncertainties. Also, failure can be far too easy to blame on the parliamentarian. I’m open to considering the reconciliation path, but we should make this decision with our eyes open. To do that, we need to separate fact from fiction when it comes to the talking filibuster.

Mike Lee

428,339 次观看 • 1 个月前

$HIMS Price Target in last 2 months & Eucalyptus✍️ Not Fianancial Advice! DYOR! Jefferies – lowered to $24.50 (from $25.50). Needham (Ryan MacDonald) – Buy, raised $30 → $35 BofA Securities (Allen Lutz) – Neutral, lowered $28 → $25 Leerink – Hold, $25 (maintain). Jun 3, 2026: Canaccord – Buy, $32 (maintain) JPMorgan (Cory Carpenter): Overweight, $35→ $33 Most of these analysts demand proof of re-accelerated growth, and refused to add Eucalyptus revenue in. Refused to build model/forecast on $HIMS scaling in 9 different countries. Q2 2026 will have 26-30% growth. Q3 and Q4 2026 will add Eucalyptue revenue in. But Eucalyptus entire year revenue belongs to $HIMS, but bears will say how much respect they have to reporting standard so they won't add it to Q1 Q2. That is fine, but as for investors u should be aware that Eucalyptus had an annualized revenue run-rate of ~$450M+ (as of early 2026) and now with with $HIMS growth will accelerate, where $HIMS raised guidance Full Year 2026: $2.8B – $3.0B did not include Eucalyptus. Eucalyptus is projected to have $600-$900M for FY2026(or $750m mid point) Q1 Q2 2026 adds around $120 and $150m estimated. $HIMS guidance for Q2 without Eucalyptus is $680-$700m Or consolidated $HIMS Q1 2026 $608.1m + $120m=$728.1m or 24.2% YoY Q2 2026 $680m(guide) + $150m=$800m or 52% YoY Q3 2026 $800m(est) +$200m= $1B or 67% YoY Q4 2026 $912m (est) + $280m= $1.192B or 93% YoY A. FY2027 when included all Eucalyptus revenue =$3.72B(conservative)-$4B(High end) or 58.2%-70.2% B. FY2027 when excluded Eucalyptus Q1 Q2 revenue =$3.48B(conseravtive)-$3.7B(High end) or 48%-57.4% Short sellers will say Eucalyptus is inorganic growth and they will only use B calculation above because they respect reporting standard. Or how they will wait until FY2027 so bears have time to exit at cheap share price. Eucalyptus is a strategic platform builder with synergy potential, not just a pure revenue add-on. The completion of Eucalyptus in June 2, 2026 marks a pivotal step in transforming Hims from a primarily U.S.-centric telehealth provider into a truly global consumer health platform. This deal accelerates Hims’ international footprint, giving it immediate leadership or strengthened positions in key markets and positioning the company to serve customers across approximately 9 countries through a combination of direct operations, local brands, and growing presence. Combined with Hims’ existing U.S. dominance, this creates a robust multi-continent platform focused on personalized, affordable care in areas like sexual health, hair loss, mental health, weight management (including GLP-1 offerings where regulated), and more. United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Germany, France, Ireland, Spain, Japan. $HIMS revenue growth internationally will accelerate growth and avoid US market concentration risk. Long term management guided $6.5 billion revenue and $1.3 billion Adjusted EBITDA by 2030. IMO this guidance will be reached by 2028/2029. Not Fianancial Advice! DYOR! Clip from :

$HIMS Price Target in last 2 months & Eucalyptus✍️ Not Fianancial Advice! DYOR! Jefferies – lowered to $24.50 (from $25.50). Needham (Ryan MacDonald) – Buy, raised $30 → $35 BofA Securities (Allen Lutz) – Neutral, lowered $28 → $25 Leerink – Hold, $25 (maintain). Jun 3, 2026: Canaccord – Buy, $32 (maintain) JPMorgan (Cory Carpenter): Overweight, $35→ $33 Most of these analysts demand proof of re-accelerated growth, and refused to add Eucalyptus revenue in. Refused to build model/forecast on $HIMS scaling in 9 different countries. Q2 2026 will have 26-30% growth. Q3 and Q4 2026 will add Eucalyptue revenue in. But Eucalyptus entire year revenue belongs to $HIMS, but bears will say how much respect they have to reporting standard so they won't add it to Q1 Q2. That is fine, but as for investors u should be aware that Eucalyptus had an annualized revenue run-rate of ~$450M+ (as of early 2026) and now with with $HIMS growth will accelerate, where $HIMS raised guidance Full Year 2026: $2.8B – $3.0B did not include Eucalyptus. Eucalyptus is projected to have $600-$900M for FY2026(or $750m mid point) Q1 Q2 2026 adds around $120 and $150m estimated. $HIMS guidance for Q2 without Eucalyptus is $680-$700m Or consolidated $HIMS Q1 2026 $608.1m + $120m=$728.1m or 24.2% YoY Q2 2026 $680m(guide) + $150m=$800m or 52% YoY Q3 2026 $800m(est) +$200m= $1B or 67% YoY Q4 2026 $912m (est) + $280m= $1.192B or 93% YoY A. FY2027 when included all Eucalyptus revenue =$3.72B(conservative)-$4B(High end) or 58.2%-70.2% B. FY2027 when excluded Eucalyptus Q1 Q2 revenue =$3.48B(conseravtive)-$3.7B(High end) or 48%-57.4% Short sellers will say Eucalyptus is inorganic growth and they will only use B calculation above because they respect reporting standard. Or how they will wait until FY2027 so bears have time to exit at cheap share price. Eucalyptus is a strategic platform builder with synergy potential, not just a pure revenue add-on. The completion of Eucalyptus in June 2, 2026 marks a pivotal step in transforming Hims from a primarily U.S.-centric telehealth provider into a truly global consumer health platform. This deal accelerates Hims’ international footprint, giving it immediate leadership or strengthened positions in key markets and positioning the company to serve customers across approximately 9 countries through a combination of direct operations, local brands, and growing presence. Combined with Hims’ existing U.S. dominance, this creates a robust multi-continent platform focused on personalized, affordable care in areas like sexual health, hair loss, mental health, weight management (including GLP-1 offerings where regulated), and more. United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Germany, France, Ireland, Spain, Japan. $HIMS revenue growth internationally will accelerate growth and avoid US market concentration risk. Long term management guided $6.5 billion revenue and $1.3 billion Adjusted EBITDA by 2030. IMO this guidance will be reached by 2028/2029. Not Fianancial Advice! DYOR! Clip from :

Mike

64,664 次观看 • 2 个月前

⾨ 🛸👽 Is Dr. Hal Puthoff a True Insider and Gatekeeper? 👽🛸 ⾨ "It SEEMS like there is that crash retrieval program." ~HP "I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program." ~HP ~ Gerb on Fresh Freedom Podcast: "At the UAPDF → Disclosure Foundation event, you (Puthoff) stated, if you revealed everything you knew about the subject, you would go to jail. So, I'm gonna take that as assuming you may have worked in a specific-national-program capacity on such projects of exotic, or technologies of unknown origin." (It's well known that Puthoff was involved, via his company, EarthTech, as a subcontractor in the UFO program, AAWSAP. He was the Senior Science Advisor. He was also involved with the follow-up effort (not an official program) known as AATIP. And yes, much of what they worked on was classified, and as far as we know, that's still the case today. So, Puthoff just can't share all that he knows or learned from that, or he could go to jail. In theory. Was Puthoff read into some other UFO-related program or SAP that he's just not telling us about? It seems like that's what Gerb was insinuating. My opinion? I don't think so. And Puthoff explained where his knowledge comes from in this interview from January of 2025. Did Gerb not see this?) Dr. Hal Puthoff: "Well, a program like that, crash retrievals, and so on, and deep analysis. I mean, this is something that, if it's occurring, you know, is still behind the scenes and highly classified." (IF it's occurring.) Puthoff: "However, I've interacted with the various intelligence officers who've been given the job, officially - actual official jobs - to dig out what's true about the so-called Legacy programs and crash retrievals and so on." (He's saying that his knowledge of any UFO-related Legacy programs (including anything on crash retrievals) is based on what other people have told him.) Puthoff: "People like David Grusch, who appeared before Congress, under oath, and he made the statement that, in fact, there is a Legacy program, we do have access to crash-retrieved craft, even crash-retrieved biologics. Knowing him and where he came from...he was at the National Reconnaissance Office, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, at the highest level of clearances." (Grusch is one person Puthoff references as a source for details on the alleged crash retrieval program. And as Grusch has said, most of what he (Grusch) learned was from talking to others who claimed they were firsthand folks who worked IN the Legacy program. Grusch sent some of those folks to the Inspector General so they could share what they know. So, with this specific information (minus whatever photos or reports Grusch saw), Grusch is a second hand witness and Puthoff is a third hand "witness." Puthoff: "[Grusch] interviewed, as he claimed in his statement before Congress, over 40 individuals over a four-year period, and all this data was collected together, and it seems like there is that crash retrieval program." (Even Hal uses the word "claimed" with Grusch, and he also uses words that tell us (unless you're going to accuse him of lying) that he has NOT been read into any of those programs. "Seems like there is that crash retrieval program." SEEMS.) Puthoff: "So although I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program..." (Pretty important sentence right there. He has heard things from folks (like the late Jim Ryder of Lockheed?) who claimed to have worked in that program, but he hasn't officially been read in or had to sign any NDAs, so he can speak about some of it. See my post from yesterday where Grusch says he's lucky he never signed an NDA or he would have had to keep his mouth shut.) Puthoff: "...I've interacted with people like Grusch and many others whose...I just simply can't say I'm not hearing the truth. So, I would put my stamp on the idea that there is such a program." (He's making a judgment on what he has been told. Obviously, I can't 100% rule out that Puthoff hasn't had SOME access to some of this information, and maybe he's seen the same photos that Grusch and Davis have referenced, and Bigelow has hinted at in one of his interviews with George Knapp. But I don't believe Puthoff is on the very inside and just pretending that he's not. We still have yet to hear from someone who worked in those programs, hands on. And yes, I know Puthoff seemed confused when Gerb asked him about the Legacy program being shut down and the timing related to that. I hope The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford asks Eric Davis about that today. Play the clip of it for Eric. And I also know that sometimes, based on Puthoff's words, it seems like he may be a firsthand witness, but I think that's him just being casual with his words. This interview from 2025 makes it pretty clear how he learned all of this information, or alleged information. My Opinion: Dr. Hal Puthoff has never been on the inside of any UFO-related Legacy program and he is NOT a gatekeeper.)

⾨ 🛸👽 Is Dr. Hal Puthoff a True Insider and Gatekeeper? 👽🛸 ⾨ "It SEEMS like there is that crash retrieval program." ~HP "I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program." ~HP ~ Gerb on Fresh Freedom Podcast: "At the UAPDF → Disclosure Foundation event, you (Puthoff) stated, if you revealed everything you knew about the subject, you would go to jail. So, I'm gonna take that as assuming you may have worked in a specific-national-program capacity on such projects of exotic, or technologies of unknown origin." (It's well known that Puthoff was involved, via his company, EarthTech, as a subcontractor in the UFO program, AAWSAP. He was the Senior Science Advisor. He was also involved with the follow-up effort (not an official program) known as AATIP. And yes, much of what they worked on was classified, and as far as we know, that's still the case today. So, Puthoff just can't share all that he knows or learned from that, or he could go to jail. In theory. Was Puthoff read into some other UFO-related program or SAP that he's just not telling us about? It seems like that's what Gerb was insinuating. My opinion? I don't think so. And Puthoff explained where his knowledge comes from in this interview from January of 2025. Did Gerb not see this?) Dr. Hal Puthoff: "Well, a program like that, crash retrievals, and so on, and deep analysis. I mean, this is something that, if it's occurring, you know, is still behind the scenes and highly classified." (IF it's occurring.) Puthoff: "However, I've interacted with the various intelligence officers who've been given the job, officially - actual official jobs - to dig out what's true about the so-called Legacy programs and crash retrievals and so on." (He's saying that his knowledge of any UFO-related Legacy programs (including anything on crash retrievals) is based on what other people have told him.) Puthoff: "People like David Grusch, who appeared before Congress, under oath, and he made the statement that, in fact, there is a Legacy program, we do have access to crash-retrieved craft, even crash-retrieved biologics. Knowing him and where he came from...he was at the National Reconnaissance Office, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, at the highest level of clearances." (Grusch is one person Puthoff references as a source for details on the alleged crash retrieval program. And as Grusch has said, most of what he (Grusch) learned was from talking to others who claimed they were firsthand folks who worked IN the Legacy program. Grusch sent some of those folks to the Inspector General so they could share what they know. So, with this specific information (minus whatever photos or reports Grusch saw), Grusch is a second hand witness and Puthoff is a third hand "witness." Puthoff: "[Grusch] interviewed, as he claimed in his statement before Congress, over 40 individuals over a four-year period, and all this data was collected together, and it seems like there is that crash retrieval program." (Even Hal uses the word "claimed" with Grusch, and he also uses words that tell us (unless you're going to accuse him of lying) that he has NOT been read into any of those programs. "Seems like there is that crash retrieval program." SEEMS.) Puthoff: "So although I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program..." (Pretty important sentence right there. He has heard things from folks (like the late Jim Ryder of Lockheed?) who claimed to have worked in that program, but he hasn't officially been read in or had to sign any NDAs, so he can speak about some of it. See my post from yesterday where Grusch says he's lucky he never signed an NDA or he would have had to keep his mouth shut.) Puthoff: "...I've interacted with people like Grusch and many others whose...I just simply can't say I'm not hearing the truth. So, I would put my stamp on the idea that there is such a program." (He's making a judgment on what he has been told. Obviously, I can't 100% rule out that Puthoff hasn't had SOME access to some of this information, and maybe he's seen the same photos that Grusch and Davis have referenced, and Bigelow has hinted at in one of his interviews with George Knapp. But I don't believe Puthoff is on the very inside and just pretending that he's not. We still have yet to hear from someone who worked in those programs, hands on. And yes, I know Puthoff seemed confused when Gerb asked him about the Legacy program being shut down and the timing related to that. I hope The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford asks Eric Davis about that today. Play the clip of it for Eric. And I also know that sometimes, based on Puthoff's words, it seems like he may be a firsthand witness, but I think that's him just being casual with his words. This interview from 2025 makes it pretty clear how he learned all of this information, or alleged information. My Opinion: Dr. Hal Puthoff has never been on the inside of any UFO-related Legacy program and he is NOT a gatekeeper.)

Joe Murgia

19,680 次观看 • 1 个月前

so I started with FreeCAD, since i am a linux guy, haven't touched windows since the past 8 years. Also I did this online course from Uni of California Irvine on "building your hardware for your embedded and IoT projects" which had FreeCAD as the main CAD software. FreeCAD was free, and fun, yeah a bit buggy sometimes but gets the job done, since initially all the CAD work i had was just builidng cases, or mounts, or some light hobby stuff. So FreeCAD did just fine. Then I joined a company as a product engineer where I worked with LiFePo4 home energy storage battery packs and was responsible for all the modules of the pack (Cells, BMS, MCUs, Touch Display ) mainly the embedded system. Since I was the product engineer, I'd have back and forth convos with the CAD designers off the battery pack box/casing. I didn't really do any CAD work on that project, tho it seemed really interesting to me. They used Solidworks, and I installed windows for it(swallowing that was difficult); to do Solidworks in my free time which I hardly got. I tried Solidworks and I kinda liked it. But then I quit the job and started working on my SAAS products. A few months into it, it's not fun anymore, slowly getting started with CAD and eventually to electronics to hardware products. Now, I want to go about CAD. I'll be doing a 30 days CAD challenge increasing in complexity and will be sharing daily progress here! It was day 2; I designer a bolt and a nut. I'm going with Fusion 360 for now, coz i like the UI/UX and the hobbyist version is free. So yeah. This is so much fun, i completely lost track of time while doing it. Gemini on the side is alot helpful.

so I started with FreeCAD, since i am a linux guy, haven't touched windows since the past 8 years. Also I did this online course from Uni of California Irvine on "building your hardware for your embedded and IoT projects" which had FreeCAD as the main CAD software. FreeCAD was free, and fun, yeah a bit buggy sometimes but gets the job done, since initially all the CAD work i had was just builidng cases, or mounts, or some light hobby stuff. So FreeCAD did just fine. Then I joined a company as a product engineer where I worked with LiFePo4 home energy storage battery packs and was responsible for all the modules of the pack (Cells, BMS, MCUs, Touch Display ) mainly the embedded system. Since I was the product engineer, I'd have back and forth convos with the CAD designers off the battery pack box/casing. I didn't really do any CAD work on that project, tho it seemed really interesting to me. They used Solidworks, and I installed windows for it(swallowing that was difficult); to do Solidworks in my free time which I hardly got. I tried Solidworks and I kinda liked it. But then I quit the job and started working on my SAAS products. A few months into it, it's not fun anymore, slowly getting started with CAD and eventually to electronics to hardware products. Now, I want to go about CAD. I'll be doing a 30 days CAD challenge increasing in complexity and will be sharing daily progress here! It was day 2; I designer a bolt and a nut. I'm going with Fusion 360 for now, coz i like the UI/UX and the hobbyist version is free. So yeah. This is so much fun, i completely lost track of time while doing it. Gemini on the side is alot helpful.

Mustafa

20,127 次观看 • 7 个月前

Claude and a free weather API will earn you $100k+. Success rate for beginners: 80%. Complete guide and algorithm for building Polymarket weather trading bot. Simple logic, a low entry budget and high ROI -that’s why weather bots are so clean. Onchain proof these bots exist: 1st bot: 2nd bot: I verified their profitability by myself copying every trade - each bot's win rate over time ranges from 80 to 90%. I grew my starting capital by +40% in just one week. You can copy their trades and see for yourself in two clicks through this bot: The alpha is simple: you're not trading weather. You're trading other people's ignorance. Gap between what the crowd prices and what 51 ensemble models say. Polymarket asks: "Will Atlanta hit 95°F tomorrow?" Normies bet on vibes. You bet on math. The core tool: Open-Meteo API. Free. No key needed. 51-model ensemble. Clean JSON. Cooked and ready. Update every 30 min. Hardcode your city coordinates - don't waste time on geocoding at runtime. This single endpoint beats most paid tools for what Polymarket actually needs. The edge in one sentence: Market is heavy on 16°C. Your 51-model ensemble points at 19°C. That's your trade. Find that gap systematically across every city market, every day - and you have a scanner. That's what separates consistent traders from gamblers. How to start: - Week 1: Open-Meteo + tropicaltidbits. Pick one city market. Track model vs market price daily. Don't trade yet — just watch where you'd have been right. - Weeks 2–3: Automate the pull. Log ensemble divergences. Build the scanner. - Week 4: Now you have an edge. Trade it. Most people want to skip to week 4. That's exactly why most people lose. Now you have the algorithm framework plus a complete guide to get started. All that's left is to actually do it. Bookmark this post so you can come back to it when you start building the bot.

Claude and a free weather API will earn you $100k+. Success rate for beginners: 80%. Complete guide and algorithm for building Polymarket weather trading bot. Simple logic, a low entry budget and high ROI -that’s why weather bots are so clean. Onchain proof these bots exist: 1st bot: 2nd bot: I verified their profitability by myself copying every trade - each bot's win rate over time ranges from 80 to 90%. I grew my starting capital by +40% in just one week. You can copy their trades and see for yourself in two clicks through this bot: The alpha is simple: you're not trading weather. You're trading other people's ignorance. Gap between what the crowd prices and what 51 ensemble models say. Polymarket asks: "Will Atlanta hit 95°F tomorrow?" Normies bet on vibes. You bet on math. The core tool: Open-Meteo API. Free. No key needed. 51-model ensemble. Clean JSON. Cooked and ready. Update every 30 min. Hardcode your city coordinates - don't waste time on geocoding at runtime. This single endpoint beats most paid tools for what Polymarket actually needs. The edge in one sentence: Market is heavy on 16°C. Your 51-model ensemble points at 19°C. That's your trade. Find that gap systematically across every city market, every day - and you have a scanner. That's what separates consistent traders from gamblers. How to start: - Week 1: Open-Meteo + tropicaltidbits. Pick one city market. Track model vs market price daily. Don't trade yet — just watch where you'd have been right. - Weeks 2–3: Automate the pull. Log ensemble divergences. Build the scanner. - Week 4: Now you have an edge. Trade it. Most people want to skip to week 4. That's exactly why most people lose. Now you have the algorithm framework plus a complete guide to get started. All that's left is to actually do it. Bookmark this post so you can come back to it when you start building the bot.

cvxv666

50,799 次观看 • 4 个月前

FLEX TALK X JOONGDUNK #Flex1045xDareYouToDeath #จุงดัง #JoongDunk : what should we talk about? 🌞Dunk spoke first : you want to say thank you - apologize or tell something 🌻 thank you so much, ter 🌞hey quickly! : say how quick he is really waiting to hear it 🌻 thank you so much for traveling this long journey with me 4 years already - thank you for always sharing everything, saying if something isn’t okay and i’ll also say it back: “thank you for understanding each other - knowing what each person likes and doesn’t like”. thank you for holding hands and going forward together i hope in the future i’ll still see your face - i want to have you by my side walking this path together continuously 🌻hank you truly let me hold your hand a bit—not for anything just the air is cold, 🌻 thank you so much for coming this far together - it’s hard to put into words but all i really want to say is thank you 🌻and i want to apologize too - sorry na krub if i ever did something you didn’t like without realizing it sometimes i may think in only one way about certain things sometimes i think too simply - sorry and thank you so much for understanding me : so cute, there’s the word “thank you” about 25 times 🌻honestly there’s no other word just “thank you” especially lately thank you for understanding each other more i’ll say it – this year is the year where the two of us JoongDunk understand each other the most since we started working together 🌞i don’t know where to start but it’s okay i’ll start with a “thank you” because i believe “thank you” is the biggest word right now . the biggest like thank you for still having each other today. thank you for everything we’ve been through – good days and bad days –but thank you for still being together. just say thank you for still being here because sometimes i didn’t think we’d get through it but we did 🌻we’ve made it 🌞 i didn’t think we’d make it but in the end we did. thank you for everything that has kept us together today. thank you for… patience with each other works too. because as humans we all have strengths and weaknesses but we keep learning from each other. this year i feel like i know you better than last year and i believe that next year we’ll want to know each other even more 🌻 honestly i just want to add a little… like being able to be completely myself i mean i’ve never not been myself with him and it’s okay because we already know each other inside out 🌞 it’s not just that we accept each other but that we understand each other 🌻 understand each other more 🌞sorry for the days i didn’t understand you really didn’t understand at all and sorry if sometimes for the hurtful things i once said.. sorry for sometimes saying things i didn’t want you to hear 🌻 i understand - it’s okay we can start again always

FLEX TALK X JOONGDUNK #Flex1045xDareYouToDeath #จุงดัง #JoongDunk : what should we talk about? 🌞Dunk spoke first : you want to say thank you - apologize or tell something 🌻 thank you so much, ter 🌞hey quickly! : say how quick he is really waiting to hear it 🌻 thank you so much for traveling this long journey with me 4 years already - thank you for always sharing everything, saying if something isn’t okay and i’ll also say it back: “thank you for understanding each other - knowing what each person likes and doesn’t like”. thank you for holding hands and going forward together i hope in the future i’ll still see your face - i want to have you by my side walking this path together continuously 🌻hank you truly let me hold your hand a bit—not for anything just the air is cold, 🌻 thank you so much for coming this far together - it’s hard to put into words but all i really want to say is thank you 🌻and i want to apologize too - sorry na krub if i ever did something you didn’t like without realizing it sometimes i may think in only one way about certain things sometimes i think too simply - sorry and thank you so much for understanding me : so cute, there’s the word “thank you” about 25 times 🌻honestly there’s no other word just “thank you” especially lately thank you for understanding each other more i’ll say it – this year is the year where the two of us JoongDunk understand each other the most since we started working together 🌞i don’t know where to start but it’s okay i’ll start with a “thank you” because i believe “thank you” is the biggest word right now . the biggest like thank you for still having each other today. thank you for everything we’ve been through – good days and bad days –but thank you for still being together. just say thank you for still being here because sometimes i didn’t think we’d get through it but we did 🌻we’ve made it 🌞 i didn’t think we’d make it but in the end we did. thank you for everything that has kept us together today. thank you for… patience with each other works too. because as humans we all have strengths and weaknesses but we keep learning from each other. this year i feel like i know you better than last year and i believe that next year we’ll want to know each other even more 🌻 honestly i just want to add a little… like being able to be completely myself i mean i’ve never not been myself with him and it’s okay because we already know each other inside out 🌞 it’s not just that we accept each other but that we understand each other 🌻 understand each other more 🌞sorry for the days i didn’t understand you really didn’t understand at all and sorry if sometimes for the hurtful things i once said.. sorry for sometimes saying things i didn’t want you to hear 🌻 i understand - it’s okay we can start again always

🇻🇳Jaidee’s aunt Bamnie🐣

73,230 次观看 • 7 个月前

Truly blown away today by this demo of the Arcadia platform that i was given. Ive looked into ALOT of AI/Gaming projects and this 100% the most viable one i have discovered. Im seriously surprised this has gone under the radar for so long. Like holy shit lol. And by the way.... I dont get paid for any of this, this is not a paid post. Im not taking any tokens or anything. I do all this advising and stuff for free. this is legitimately the first time in a long time i was genuinely excited about even a gaming project, let alone the gaming/AI intersection (which i love). The devs are obviously good, the concept is very viable, the MVP is built and ready and can be used right now. Truly excited for this platform and what its going to bring going forward. No shit... i wanted to play and mess around with it as i was seeing it demo'd and i havent felt that way in a long time. Just fuckin watch this youll see exactly what im talking about. Flagship agent Magnus Opus Is launching on Virtuals Protocol Genesis on Tuesday 2pm UTC. This is the level of quality and Innovation ive been trying to onboard to Virtuals Protocol. Truly setting a standard not just on virtuals but in the Gaming/AI space as a whole. This is the type of quality product that allows you to identify the bullshit fast, because you know what is possible and your expectations have been raised. It almost is like the @KosherCapital of AI/Gaming. You will see what i mean. Without a doubt this is a full 100% max allocation for me. One of the best ive seen so far. I feel fucking privileged AF to be listed as an advisor on this project. And yes i did actually advise them because the point stuff and tokenomic metas are somewhat hard to digest at first for people looking to launch. I almost didnt even give them the time of day at first but man im glad i did. I will never make that mistake again. The only downside if im being totally honest is the 30 day unlock.... but sometimes you come across a product so innovative and so unique... that it doesnt even matter... As hypocritical as that sounds coming from me, I stand by it. (and maybe we'll get crafty) Anyways enough rambling from me.... check out the demo: Docs: Medium Article: Telegram Group: Genesis launch on Virtuals Protocol:

Truly blown away today by this demo of the Arcadia platform that i was given. Ive looked into ALOT of AI/Gaming projects and this 100% the most viable one i have discovered. Im seriously surprised this has gone under the radar for so long. Like holy shit lol. And by the way.... I dont get paid for any of this, this is not a paid post. Im not taking any tokens or anything. I do all this advising and stuff for free. this is legitimately the first time in a long time i was genuinely excited about even a gaming project, let alone the gaming/AI intersection (which i love). The devs are obviously good, the concept is very viable, the MVP is built and ready and can be used right now. Truly excited for this platform and what its going to bring going forward. No shit... i wanted to play and mess around with it as i was seeing it demo'd and i havent felt that way in a long time. Just fuckin watch this youll see exactly what im talking about. Flagship agent Magnus Opus Is launching on Virtuals Protocol Genesis on Tuesday 2pm UTC. This is the level of quality and Innovation ive been trying to onboard to Virtuals Protocol. Truly setting a standard not just on virtuals but in the Gaming/AI space as a whole. This is the type of quality product that allows you to identify the bullshit fast, because you know what is possible and your expectations have been raised. It almost is like the @KosherCapital of AI/Gaming. You will see what i mean. Without a doubt this is a full 100% max allocation for me. One of the best ive seen so far. I feel fucking privileged AF to be listed as an advisor on this project. And yes i did actually advise them because the point stuff and tokenomic metas are somewhat hard to digest at first for people looking to launch. I almost didnt even give them the time of day at first but man im glad i did. I will never make that mistake again. The only downside if im being totally honest is the 30 day unlock.... but sometimes you come across a product so innovative and so unique... that it doesnt even matter... As hypocritical as that sounds coming from me, I stand by it. (and maybe we'll get crafty) Anyways enough rambling from me.... check out the demo: Docs: Medium Article: Telegram Group: Genesis launch on Virtuals Protocol:

Nick

24,267 次观看 • 1 年前

I JUST BROKE DOWN THE REAL NUMBERS ON TRUMP'S TARIFFS Everyone expected tariffs to reduce the current account deficit and restore US jobs. But the numbers tell a different story. China just posted a $1.2 trillion trade surplus in 2025. The biggest in history. Up 20% from 2024. And this happened DURING Trump's "maximum pressure" tariff campaign. Let's dive deeper: Early 2025: Tariffs on China escalated as high as 145%. Late 2025: A deal brought them down to the high-40s/low-50s range. January 2026: Trump threatens 25% tariffs on ANY country doing business with Iran. Iran's biggest trading partner? China. But here's the part nobody's talking about: The Tax Policy Center estimates the average tariff rate on ALL US imports is now 17%. The Budget Lab at Yale estimates these tariffs raised consumer prices by 1.2% - roughly $1,700 per household. In 2025, businesses absorbed most of these costs. But in 2026, they're passing them to consumers. The jobs data is worse: After the April 2025 tariff announcement, factory employment FELL by 68,000 jobs. The Federal Reserve found that tariff exposure in 2018-2019 reduced manufacturing employment by 1.4%. A small +0.3% protection effect was offset by -1.1% from higher input costs and -0.7% from retaliation. Even in optimistic scenarios, tariffs create very few jobs once you account for higher input costs destroying downstream employment and retaliation from trading partners. Trump's theory was that tariffs would force manufacturing back to the US. The reality: Companies just moved production to Vietnam, Mexico, and Malaysia. Supply chains didn't come home. They found cheaper routes around the tariffs. And China? Exports to the US fell 20%, but grew everywhere else. Africa: +26% Southeast Asia: +13% EU: +8% China maintained 14% of global exports. 4x more than India and Vietnam combined. Trump didn't destroy China's export machine. He redirected where it sells. Here's the fiscal reality: Trump claims tariffs will eliminate the deficit and eventually replace income taxes. Even in an optimistic scenario, tariffs will raise about $400 billion. The budget deficit last year? Over $2 trillion. Income tax revenue? Over $2 trillion. The math doesn't work. It's not even close. Now the legal problem: The Supreme Court is weighing whether Trump's tariffs were even legal under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Congressional researchers say importers paid roughly $129 billion in estimated duty deposits for IEEPA tariffs as of December 10, 2025. If the Court rules against Trump, that money potentially gets refunded. The entire tariff structure collapses. And nobody knows what happens next. Costco and major retailers have already filed lawsuits. Meanwhile, the EU is negotiating with China on "minimum price undertakings" to replace tariffs. Canada is considering dropping their 100% tariff on Chinese EVs. So Trump's pressure is pushing allies CLOSER to China, not away. These tariff policies are accelerating the transition to a tripolar world - US, China, and a European bloc increasingly willing to play both sides. Here's the ONE thing you have to understand: Markets can price risk. They cannot price uncertainty. Right now markets are complacent. The VIX is subdued. Credit spreads are tight. But if the Supreme Court rules against the tariffs, uncertainty escalates dramatically. No one knows what happens to the $195 billion already collected. No one knows if companies get refunds. No one knows what Trump's next move is if he loses this authority. Markets do not handle institutional uncertainty well. So are Trump's tariffs working? If working means reducing the deficit and creating US jobs, the answer is no. Tariffs can help a narrow slice of producers and raise revenue. But evidence shows they raise consumer prices and, on net, reduce manufacturing employment once you include input costs and retaliation. The next weeks will be crucial.

I JUST BROKE DOWN THE REAL NUMBERS ON TRUMP'S TARIFFS Everyone expected tariffs to reduce the current account deficit and restore US jobs. But the numbers tell a different story. China just posted a $1.2 trillion trade surplus in 2025. The biggest in history. Up 20% from 2024. And this happened DURING Trump's "maximum pressure" tariff campaign. Let's dive deeper: Early 2025: Tariffs on China escalated as high as 145%. Late 2025: A deal brought them down to the high-40s/low-50s range. January 2026: Trump threatens 25% tariffs on ANY country doing business with Iran. Iran's biggest trading partner? China. But here's the part nobody's talking about: The Tax Policy Center estimates the average tariff rate on ALL US imports is now 17%. The Budget Lab at Yale estimates these tariffs raised consumer prices by 1.2% - roughly $1,700 per household. In 2025, businesses absorbed most of these costs. But in 2026, they're passing them to consumers. The jobs data is worse: After the April 2025 tariff announcement, factory employment FELL by 68,000 jobs. The Federal Reserve found that tariff exposure in 2018-2019 reduced manufacturing employment by 1.4%. A small +0.3% protection effect was offset by -1.1% from higher input costs and -0.7% from retaliation. Even in optimistic scenarios, tariffs create very few jobs once you account for higher input costs destroying downstream employment and retaliation from trading partners. Trump's theory was that tariffs would force manufacturing back to the US. The reality: Companies just moved production to Vietnam, Mexico, and Malaysia. Supply chains didn't come home. They found cheaper routes around the tariffs. And China? Exports to the US fell 20%, but grew everywhere else. Africa: +26% Southeast Asia: +13% EU: +8% China maintained 14% of global exports. 4x more than India and Vietnam combined. Trump didn't destroy China's export machine. He redirected where it sells. Here's the fiscal reality: Trump claims tariffs will eliminate the deficit and eventually replace income taxes. Even in an optimistic scenario, tariffs will raise about $400 billion. The budget deficit last year? Over $2 trillion. Income tax revenue? Over $2 trillion. The math doesn't work. It's not even close. Now the legal problem: The Supreme Court is weighing whether Trump's tariffs were even legal under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Congressional researchers say importers paid roughly $129 billion in estimated duty deposits for IEEPA tariffs as of December 10, 2025. If the Court rules against Trump, that money potentially gets refunded. The entire tariff structure collapses. And nobody knows what happens next. Costco and major retailers have already filed lawsuits. Meanwhile, the EU is negotiating with China on "minimum price undertakings" to replace tariffs. Canada is considering dropping their 100% tariff on Chinese EVs. So Trump's pressure is pushing allies CLOSER to China, not away. These tariff policies are accelerating the transition to a tripolar world - US, China, and a European bloc increasingly willing to play both sides. Here's the ONE thing you have to understand: Markets can price risk. They cannot price uncertainty. Right now markets are complacent. The VIX is subdued. Credit spreads are tight. But if the Supreme Court rules against the tariffs, uncertainty escalates dramatically. No one knows what happens to the $195 billion already collected. No one knows if companies get refunds. No one knows what Trump's next move is if he loses this authority. Markets do not handle institutional uncertainty well. So are Trump's tariffs working? If working means reducing the deficit and creating US jobs, the answer is no. Tariffs can help a narrow slice of producers and raise revenue. But evidence shows they raise consumer prices and, on net, reduce manufacturing employment once you include input costs and retaliation. The next weeks will be crucial.

George Noble

90,666 次观看 • 7 个月前