Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

#LakeShow Luka Dončić exited tonight vs #ThunderUp with a left hamstring injury—grabbing the exact same spot from 8 weeks ago—textbook high-risk re-aggravation setup. Let’s break this down

MEDspiration

11,044 subscribers

157,014 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness News & Politics Sports #LakeShow #ThunderUp

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

#DubNation Moses Moody went down with a graphic left knee injury in OT tonight against the #MFFL, lets break this down (⚠️Viewer Discretion Advised)

#DubNation Moses Moody went down with a graphic left knee injury in OT tonight against the #MFFL, lets break this down (⚠️Viewer Discretion Advised)

MEDspiration

231,623 views • 4 months ago

#Uruguay midfielder Manuel Ugarte was stretchered off against #LaRoja with a severe left knee injury — after his knee was loaded into one of the most dangerous positions in sports. Let’s break this down.

#Uruguay midfielder Manuel Ugarte was stretchered off against #LaRoja with a severe left knee injury — after his knee was loaded into one of the most dangerous positions in sports. Let’s break this down.

MEDspiration

29,134 views • 1 month ago

16 years ago today, a 22 year old injured Cesc Fàbregas came off the bench to score 2 goals & single-handedly win the game before being substituted off, as Arsenal beat Aston Villa 3-0 to stay 2nd. Fàbregas was suffering from a hamstring problem, which had ruled him out for the previous 2 weeks & he aggravated the injury during this cameo but the risk paid off. It wasn’t the last time that Fàbregas would make a contribution while carrying an injury.

16 years ago today, a 22 year old injured Cesc Fàbregas came off the bench to score 2 goals & single-handedly win the game before being substituted off, as Arsenal beat Aston Villa 3-0 to stay 2nd. Fàbregas was suffering from a hamstring problem, which had ruled him out for the previous 2 weeks & he aggravated the injury during this cameo but the risk paid off. It wasn’t the last time that Fàbregas would make a contribution while carrying an injury.

ابو

130,845 views • 7 months ago

$BTC (Video) The move you’re seeing right now didn’t happen by chance. This is a confirmed weekly Bottom Signal - the exact type of setup we look for when identifying the start of high-probability trend shifts. I break down the full setup execution in the video. More importantly - this wasn’t reactive. This setup was identified in real time and shared with X subs ahead of the move. That’s the edge. Now, the next phase we’re watching for is green Dots to print🟢 From there, it’s about staying in the move - not guessing. And the Dots will help us do exactly that. We are managing this with our stop losses from the Alpha Vault. (If you ever wanted to get the Alpha Vault tools from Trading Alpha we do have an enrollment sale for the bull setup - see pinned post for details)

$BTC (Video) The move you’re seeing right now didn’t happen by chance. This is a confirmed weekly Bottom Signal - the exact type of setup we look for when identifying the start of high-probability trend shifts. I break down the full setup execution in the video. More importantly - this wasn’t reactive. This setup was identified in real time and shared with X subs ahead of the move. That’s the edge. Now, the next phase we’re watching for is green Dots to print🟢 From there, it’s about staying in the move - not guessing. And the Dots will help us do exactly that. We are managing this with our stop losses from the Alpha Vault. (If you ever wanted to get the Alpha Vault tools from Trading Alpha we do have an enrollment sale for the bull setup - see pinned post for details)

Wick

40,834 views • 3 months ago

Have We Changed our Approach to Hamstring Injuries? 🎯 Five key points for clinical practice: 1⃣ - Strength and Flexibility are weak risk factors for hamstring injuries and continue to form a small but important part of the causal pathway. Although the evidence for stretching is lacking, multi-faceted prevention programmes might consider including these components to be successful in the prevention of hamstring injuries. 2⃣ - Intrinsic neuromuscular function may be altered post-injury. Clinicians should focus on returning the player to full function during the rehabilitation of hamstring injuries, which may include specific targeted intervention even after return to play. 3⃣ - Our common strength and flexibility tests have poor predictive value, and do not possess the characteristics needed to successfully identify individual players at greater risk of hamstring injury. This is evident in the large amount of variability between seasons, and poor sensitivity and specificity demonstrated for these measurements. The wide overlap in distribution of pre-season strength between injured and uninjured players demonstrates the difficulty in identifying a subgroup of at-risk players that might benefit from targeted intervention. It is therefore recommended that prevention programs be implemented for all players. 4⃣ - Workload monitoring provide another potential way in which we may reduce the risk of injury. The aggregation of chronic workload, as well as careful planning of acute workload increases, may reduce the risk of hamstring injury. However, high-level evidence to support this is lacking. 5⃣ - Understanding the context in which injuries occur and appreciating the complex nature of these injuries are important considerations to better manage players with hamstring injuries 🔗Read the full article 👉 ✍️ Roald Bahr & Nicol van Dyk

Have We Changed our Approach to Hamstring Injuries? 🎯 Five key points for clinical practice: 1⃣ - Strength and Flexibility are weak risk factors for hamstring injuries and continue to form a small but important part of the causal pathway. Although the evidence for stretching is lacking, multi-faceted prevention programmes might consider including these components to be successful in the prevention of hamstring injuries. 2⃣ - Intrinsic neuromuscular function may be altered post-injury. Clinicians should focus on returning the player to full function during the rehabilitation of hamstring injuries, which may include specific targeted intervention even after return to play. 3⃣ - Our common strength and flexibility tests have poor predictive value, and do not possess the characteristics needed to successfully identify individual players at greater risk of hamstring injury. This is evident in the large amount of variability between seasons, and poor sensitivity and specificity demonstrated for these measurements. The wide overlap in distribution of pre-season strength between injured and uninjured players demonstrates the difficulty in identifying a subgroup of at-risk players that might benefit from targeted intervention. It is therefore recommended that prevention programs be implemented for all players. 4⃣ - Workload monitoring provide another potential way in which we may reduce the risk of injury. The aggregation of chronic workload, as well as careful planning of acute workload increases, may reduce the risk of hamstring injury. However, high-level evidence to support this is lacking. 5⃣ - Understanding the context in which injuries occur and appreciating the complex nature of these injuries are important considerations to better manage players with hamstring injuries 🔗Read the full article 👉 ✍️ Roald Bahr & Nicol van Dyk

Aspetar سبيتار

11,732 views • 2 years ago

🛰️ SPACE STOCKS MIGHT BE THE NEXT EXPLOSIVE SECTOR IN THE U.S. STOCK MARKET. $RKLB broke its bull-flag with a MACD golden cross and had a huge expansion. When I first called this out a few weeks ago, $ASTS had not broken out yet. It has now, the exact same way RocketLab did. There is still a lot of expansion left. Make sure you don't miss it.

🛰️ SPACE STOCKS MIGHT BE THE NEXT EXPLOSIVE SECTOR IN THE U.S. STOCK MARKET. $RKLB broke its bull-flag with a MACD golden cross and had a huge expansion. When I first called this out a few weeks ago, $ASTS had not broken out yet. It has now, the exact same way RocketLab did. There is still a lot of expansion left. Make sure you don't miss it.

༺Cℝץ͢͢͢℘to༻

39,868 views • 2 months ago

Bill Gates was caught on camera laughing uncontrollably while issuing dire warnings about imminent bioterror attacks and future pandemics. This happened at the exact same time law enforcement was raiding and shutting down an illegal biolab complex spanning Las Vegas and Reedley, California — a facility found to be illegally housing dangerous pathogens including Ebola samples, along with other high-risk biological agents.

Bill Gates was caught on camera laughing uncontrollably while issuing dire warnings about imminent bioterror attacks and future pandemics. This happened at the exact same time law enforcement was raiding and shutting down an illegal biolab complex spanning Las Vegas and Reedley, California — a facility found to be illegally housing dangerous pathogens including Ebola samples, along with other high-risk biological agents.

Died Suddenly

56,312 views • 2 months ago

$S&P 500 is quietly repeating the exact same pattern from last year. Same structure. Same sequence. Same liquidity engineering. 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 playing out again like nothing changed. But almost nobody is paying attention. A year ago, this setup ended with a sharp move that caught everyone off guard. And now we’re right back at the same point in the cycle. I already mapped this scenario before it started unfolding. This isn’t randomness - it’s positioning. The market is moving exactly where it needs to, to trap the majority. And if this fractal holds, the move will be aggressive. Turn on notifications. I’ll call it in real time.$

S&P 500 is quietly repeating the exact same pattern from last year. Same structure. Same sequence. Same liquidity engineering. 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 playing out again like nothing changed. But almost nobody is paying attention. A year ago, this setup ended with a sharp move that caught everyone off guard. And now we’re right back at the same point in the cycle. I already mapped this scenario before it started unfolding. This isn’t randomness - it’s positioning. The market is moving exactly where it needs to, to trap the majority. And if this fractal holds, the move will be aggressive. Turn on notifications. I’ll call it in real time.

Kabuki🔴

121,043 views • 3 months ago

🚨 CMC UPDATE: Deja vu for CMC? Christian McCaffrey has a NEW calf injury that he suffered yesterday. He went from a full unrestricted practice on Wednesday to a limited practice on Thursday to a DNP today, working off to the side with strength and conditioning coaches. McCaffrey has a significant history of calf strains dating back to playoffs in 2022, they cost him a game in 2023, and were the beginning of his issues in 2024. It is unclear if this is the same injury as his old one or a new one. Likely it is a re-aggravation of the old one. It is also unclear if his Achilles are involved. He is listed as questionable for Week 1. He very well may be a game-time decision. I think there’s just as much of a chance of him playing as him missing. IF he plays, I believe they will limit his touches (15-20?), mixing in Brian Robinson Jr. and maybe Isaac Guerrendo. McCaffrey will be at moderate to high risk for re-injury. The missed time with a calf strain in 1 study of NFL athletes was 17-31 days.

🚨 CMC UPDATE: Deja vu for CMC? Christian McCaffrey has a NEW calf injury that he suffered yesterday. He went from a full unrestricted practice on Wednesday to a limited practice on Thursday to a DNP today, working off to the side with strength and conditioning coaches. McCaffrey has a significant history of calf strains dating back to playoffs in 2022, they cost him a game in 2023, and were the beginning of his issues in 2024. It is unclear if this is the same injury as his old one or a new one. Likely it is a re-aggravation of the old one. It is also unclear if his Achilles are involved. He is listed as questionable for Week 1. He very well may be a game-time decision. I think there’s just as much of a chance of him playing as him missing. IF he plays, I believe they will limit his touches (15-20?), mixing in Brian Robinson Jr. and maybe Isaac Guerrendo. McCaffrey will be at moderate to high risk for re-injury. The missed time with a calf strain in 1 study of NFL athletes was 17-31 days.

Jesse Morse, M.D.

308,187 views • 11 months ago

🚨 Deep dive on a high-performing $PDD option contract from unusual_whales 🐳 — ran from $5.10 to $13.20 (+158.82%) and still sits 7% in the money. In this video, I break down: • The original whale entry • Spot price vs. IV spike • Bid/ask dynamics • Why not all bid-side flow = closing • Net call premium surges • What made this contract stand out on 7/8 when the whale opened their position Whether you're new to flow trading or looking to sharpen your edge, this one's packed with value. Full breakdown using unusual_whales flow tools. 📊 Watch now & level up your tape reading.

🚨 Deep dive on a high-performing $PDD option contract from unusual_whales 🐳 — ran from $5.10 to $13.20 (+158.82%) and still sits 7% in the money. In this video, I break down: • The original whale entry • Spot price vs. IV spike • Bid/ask dynamics • Why not all bid-side flow = closing • Net call premium surges • What made this contract stand out on 7/8 when the whale opened their position Whether you're new to flow trading or looking to sharpen your edge, this one's packed with value. Full breakdown using unusual_whales flow tools. 📊 Watch now & level up your tape reading.

Anthony Sandford

154,536 views • 1 year ago

🚨 LEFT VS RIGHT IS OVER — FREEDOM VS CONTROL IS THE REAL BATTLE In Episode 8 of Fearless, Ben Habib sits down with due The Freds (Right said Fred) for a hard-hitting conversation on: • Nationhood • Free speech • Why ordinary people are rejecting the “new normal” This is about sovereignty. Identity. And taking power back from unelected control systems. ⏰ Tune in tonight at 6pm Right Said Fred Advance UK Ben Habib

🚨 LEFT VS RIGHT IS OVER — FREEDOM VS CONTROL IS THE REAL BATTLE In Episode 8 of Fearless, Ben Habib sits down with due The Freds (Right said Fred) for a hard-hitting conversation on: • Nationhood • Free speech • Why ordinary people are rejecting the “new normal” This is about sovereignty. Identity. And taking power back from unelected control systems. ⏰ Tune in tonight at 6pm Right Said Fred Advance UK Ben Habib

Jim Ferguson

18,342 views • 6 months ago

Many right-wingers are outraged online after a university reinstated a left-leaning professor and settled with him for $500k after initially FIRING him for mocking Charlie Kirk's death. But, as gross as his post was, this is a win for the same free speech & First Amendment rights that protect conservative professors. I break it down in the latest episode of the Brad vs Everyone podcast. Subscribe:

Many right-wingers are outraged online after a university reinstated a left-leaning professor and settled with him for $500k after initially FIRING him for mocking Charlie Kirk's death. But, as gross as his post was, this is a win for the same free speech & First Amendment rights that protect conservative professors. I break it down in the latest episode of the Brad vs Everyone podcast. Subscribe:

Brad Polumbo 🇺🇸⚽️

13,549 views • 7 months ago

🚨 S&P 500 IS BEARISH 4 OUT OF 4 🚨 Every indicator on this chart is pointing the same direction: 1. Distribution - smart money has been selling into this rally for weeks 2, Volume spiking - not buyers coming in, sellers getting out 3. RSI hit overbought and rolled over - no fuel left 4. MACD crossed bearish - trend is officially shifting When one turns bearish it's a warning When all four align it's a verdict Called this setup months ago with the Volume Theory This chart just confirmed it FOLLOW + NOTIFS ON!

🚨 S&P 500 IS BEARISH 4 OUT OF 4 🚨 Every indicator on this chart is pointing the same direction: 1. Distribution - smart money has been selling into this rally for weeks 2, Volume spiking - not buyers coming in, sellers getting out 3. RSI hit overbought and rolled over - no fuel left 4. MACD crossed bearish - trend is officially shifting When one turns bearish it's a warning When all four align it's a verdict Called this setup months ago with the Volume Theory This chart just confirmed it FOLLOW + NOTIFS ON!

NoName

20,916 views • 2 months ago

92 days until Eagles football so let’s flashback to 1992. That squad snapped an 11-year playoff win drought despite the team winning 10+ games every year from 1988–1992. The ’92 Eagles were the only team in that 5 year run to finally break through in the postseason after finishing 11-5 so let’s look at their Top 11 Plays of that season: 1. Fred Barrett TD vs the Saints in the Playoff win 2. Seth Joyner (@sethjoyne) 1 handed Pick 6 vs the Vikings 3. 4th down stop vs the Redskins on the last play to clinch a playoff spot 4. 71 yard Fred Barnett stiff arm TD vs Cardinals 5. Heath Sherman 75 yard screen TD vs Packers 6. Seth Joyner strip sack with a Reggie White TD vs Cardinals 7. 4th down stop at home vs Cardinals 7 TIMES in a row inside the 1 8. Seth Joyner Pick 6 vs Giants 9. Vai Sikahema 87 punt return TD vs Giants 10. Calvin Williams 49 yard TD vs the Broncos 11. Eric Allen (Eric Allen) Pick 6 to end the Saints playoff win.

92 days until Eagles football so let’s flashback to 1992. That squad snapped an 11-year playoff win drought despite the team winning 10+ games every year from 1988–1992. The ’92 Eagles were the only team in that 5 year run to finally break through in the postseason after finishing 11-5 so let’s look at their Top 11 Plays of that season: 1. Fred Barrett TD vs the Saints in the Playoff win 2. Seth Joyner (@sethjoyne) 1 handed Pick 6 vs the Vikings 3. 4th down stop vs the Redskins on the last play to clinch a playoff spot 4. 71 yard Fred Barnett stiff arm TD vs Cardinals 5. Heath Sherman 75 yard screen TD vs Packers 6. Seth Joyner strip sack with a Reggie White TD vs Cardinals 7. 4th down stop at home vs Cardinals 7 TIMES in a row inside the 1 8. Seth Joyner Pick 6 vs Giants 9. Vai Sikahema 87 punt return TD vs Giants 10. Calvin Williams 49 yard TD vs the Broncos 11. Eric Allen (Eric Allen) Pick 6 to end the Saints playoff win.

Fly Eagles Fly Bets

24,729 views • 1 year ago

It’s a special edition of HOT TAKES—and this time we're going all in on the Betway Summer Cup 2025! Join Sky, Liberty, and Betway Africa’s very own John Bloomberg as they break down Race 8, the full race card, top exotics, sleeper picks, and the horses YOU should be watching! From Tin Pan Alley vs. Young Guns, to King Peltz vs. Equator, plus massive Pick 6 pools, place accumulators, PA, bipots, and the ultimate Summer Cup winner prediction—we’ve got you covered. Let’s turn dreams into reality this weekend!

It’s a special edition of HOT TAKES—and this time we're going all in on the Betway Summer Cup 2025! Join Sky, Liberty, and Betway Africa’s very own John Bloomberg as they break down Race 8, the full race card, top exotics, sleeper picks, and the horses YOU should be watching! From Tin Pan Alley vs. Young Guns, to King Peltz vs. Equator, plus massive Pick 6 pools, place accumulators, PA, bipots, and the ultimate Summer Cup winner prediction—we’ve got you covered. Let’s turn dreams into reality this weekend!

SmashSports powered by Betway

25,501 views • 8 months ago

Eric Bischoff is calling out the recent Brock Lesnar return as completely BIZARRE. He insists the raw emotion we saw from The Beast at WrestleMania was 100% GENUINE because Brock is an athlete, not an actor. Bischoff believes this comeback reeks of a panicked, reactionary pivot rather than a masterfully planned angle. He suspects Brock either got too emotional or realized he left a massive BAG of money on the table. WWE might be making this up as they go along. Watch Eric break down why this return feels totally disjointed and lacks any real narrative logic. (source: 83 Weeks with Eric Bischoff 83 Weeks with Eric Bischoff)

Eric Bischoff is calling out the recent Brock Lesnar return as completely BIZARRE. He insists the raw emotion we saw from The Beast at WrestleMania was 100% GENUINE because Brock is an athlete, not an actor. Bischoff believes this comeback reeks of a panicked, reactionary pivot rather than a masterfully planned angle. He suspects Brock either got too emotional or realized he left a massive BAG of money on the table. WWE might be making this up as they go along. Watch Eric break down why this return feels totally disjointed and lacks any real narrative logic. (source: 83 Weeks with Eric Bischoff 83 Weeks with Eric Bischoff)

RingsideFeed

34,725 views • 2 months ago

Strangely similar questions from two anchors on rival political shows — airing at the exact same time yesterday On CTV Power Play, Mike asked Andrew Scheer: “It would cost the federal government… $5.25 billion in tax revenue. Do you not want to use that money to pay down a deficit that your party has continually criticized for years?” He then pressed the exact same ALTO talking points: why oppose the $90B high-speed rail boondoggle (and its land expropriation) when Conservatives support pipelines? Meanwhile on CBC Power & Politics (below), Karina Roman hit Dan Albas with near-identical lines on the gas tax “hit to revenue” vs. deficit, plus the ALTO-vs-pipelines double standard Two different networks Two different Conservative MPs. Same day. Same time slot. Same scripted “gotcha” questions. Coordinated Liberal talking points, or the world’s biggest coincidence? Canadians aren’t stupid. When both networks run the same interrogation script question on the same day, at the same time, it’s not journalism — it’s an echo chamber Andrew Scheer Mike Le Couteur Brodie Fenlon

Strangely similar questions from two anchors on rival political shows — airing at the exact same time yesterday On CTV Power Play, Mike asked Andrew Scheer: “It would cost the federal government… $5.25 billion in tax revenue. Do you not want to use that money to pay down a deficit that your party has continually criticized for years?” He then pressed the exact same ALTO talking points: why oppose the $90B high-speed rail boondoggle (and its land expropriation) when Conservatives support pipelines? Meanwhile on CBC Power & Politics (below), Karina Roman hit Dan Albas with near-identical lines on the gas tax “hit to revenue” vs. deficit, plus the ALTO-vs-pipelines double standard Two different networks Two different Conservative MPs. Same day. Same time slot. Same scripted “gotcha” questions. Coordinated Liberal talking points, or the world’s biggest coincidence? Canadians aren’t stupid. When both networks run the same interrogation script question on the same day, at the same time, it’s not journalism — it’s an echo chamber Andrew Scheer Mike Le Couteur Brodie Fenlon

cbcwatcher

78,978 views • 4 months ago

Something interesting is going to be released soon... ✨ Kitt The Inner Circle Trader "If I had to trade only one model for the rest of my life, considering everything I've publicly disclosed, my choice would be either the second stage of re-distribution in an MMSM or the second stage of re-accumulation in an MMBM. With either of these, I believe I could consistently generate substantial profits without the need to explore alternative strategies. These models rely on specific components of both the buy and sell sides of the market curve, which are directly interconnected. This isn't a matter of identifying support and resistance levels; it's about understanding the logic of order flow. In the case of the market maker sell model, I focus on identifying a pool of liquidity beneath the initial consolidation. When I spot this sellside opportunity, I patiently await a reversal. This reversal should lead to a drop of at least 50% from the smart money's reversal point down to the sellside liquidity. If it achieves this, and then begins to rally once more, I'll look to correlate it with the other side of the curve, where the market previously rallied before reversing. This will provide me with an array that initially signaled a bullish trend but now acts as a reversal indicator. This marks the second stage of distribution or redistribution, and it usually happens swiftly, pushing prices towards the sellside. In essence, I'm waiting for a unicorn setup, where all the pieces align perfectly, and I have everything in my favor. I'll risk 5% on such a trade. This approach involves re-accumulation, where the sellside drops down to 50%, and then I match it with another array to capture the reversal. Now, picture a market maker model involving a consolidation phase where relative equal lows are formed, followed by an upward rally, possibly forming a consolidation that resembles a bull flag pattern. Subsequently, it rallies out of that consolidation. Sometimes, it may create a second stage of re-accumulation as it trades towards a premium array level—a level I consider a liquidity draw. If I'm feeling bullish, I'd aim for that level. I don't necessarily need to be there at the exact moment; I might spot the opportunity later and act accordingly. If it's reacting off of a level, that should offer sellside. So, you know where sellside delivery. The market should drop down. So, I'm anticipating price reacting and reversing at the smart money reversal once it starts to break down. If it goes back up a little bit, that's the smart money reversal. Low risk sell is the next stage and then they'll drop. When we reach the low-risk sell, it's important that the drop reaches at least 50% of the total range from the smart money reversal to the sellside I'm targeting. As long as it accomplishes this, I have confidence that the subsequent rally will reach a premium array on the left side of the curve before the market makes its high and reverses. Why would it do that? Because it's part of a larger continuation. So when and how would I determine when it's going to fail ,that first leg of re-distribution on the sell side, if it doesn't pierce 50% of that range from the smart money reversal down to the sell side liquidity. If it doesn't do that, then it's not going to go down there. It's going to be a continuation of reverse and go the other way." #ict #ICT

Something interesting is going to be released soon... ✨ Kitt The Inner Circle Trader "If I had to trade only one model for the rest of my life, considering everything I've publicly disclosed, my choice would be either the second stage of re-distribution in an MMSM or the second stage of re-accumulation in an MMBM. With either of these, I believe I could consistently generate substantial profits without the need to explore alternative strategies. These models rely on specific components of both the buy and sell sides of the market curve, which are directly interconnected. This isn't a matter of identifying support and resistance levels; it's about understanding the logic of order flow. In the case of the market maker sell model, I focus on identifying a pool of liquidity beneath the initial consolidation. When I spot this sellside opportunity, I patiently await a reversal. This reversal should lead to a drop of at least 50% from the smart money's reversal point down to the sellside liquidity. If it achieves this, and then begins to rally once more, I'll look to correlate it with the other side of the curve, where the market previously rallied before reversing. This will provide me with an array that initially signaled a bullish trend but now acts as a reversal indicator. This marks the second stage of distribution or redistribution, and it usually happens swiftly, pushing prices towards the sellside. In essence, I'm waiting for a unicorn setup, where all the pieces align perfectly, and I have everything in my favor. I'll risk 5% on such a trade. This approach involves re-accumulation, where the sellside drops down to 50%, and then I match it with another array to capture the reversal. Now, picture a market maker model involving a consolidation phase where relative equal lows are formed, followed by an upward rally, possibly forming a consolidation that resembles a bull flag pattern. Subsequently, it rallies out of that consolidation. Sometimes, it may create a second stage of re-accumulation as it trades towards a premium array level—a level I consider a liquidity draw. If I'm feeling bullish, I'd aim for that level. I don't necessarily need to be there at the exact moment; I might spot the opportunity later and act accordingly. If it's reacting off of a level, that should offer sellside. So, you know where sellside delivery. The market should drop down. So, I'm anticipating price reacting and reversing at the smart money reversal once it starts to break down. If it goes back up a little bit, that's the smart money reversal. Low risk sell is the next stage and then they'll drop. When we reach the low-risk sell, it's important that the drop reaches at least 50% of the total range from the smart money reversal to the sellside I'm targeting. As long as it accomplishes this, I have confidence that the subsequent rally will reach a premium array on the left side of the curve before the market makes its high and reverses. Why would it do that? Because it's part of a larger continuation. So when and how would I determine when it's going to fail ,that first leg of re-distribution on the sell side, if it doesn't pierce 50% of that range from the smart money reversal down to the sell side liquidity. If it doesn't do that, then it's not going to go down there. It's going to be a continuation of reverse and go the other way." #ict #ICT

LumiTraders

387,371 views • 2 years ago

This is wild If you examine the generic Tylenol pills at CVS, Aldi and Costco you’ll notice the prices are very different - CVS is $6 for 24 tablets - Aldi is $1.69 for 100 tablets - Costco is $8 for 1,000 tablets If you examine the pills, they are all stamped with ‘L484’ this means they all produced by the same manufacturers or contracted suppliers that simply rebrand and package for different retailers They’re all the exact same medication I’ll break down the per pill cost for everyone - CVS: $0.25 per pill - Aldi: $0.017 per pill - Kirkland (Costco): $0.008 per pill Remember, these are all the exact same pills This is a classic example of private labeling in retail. The same factory produces the pills, and stores add their markup based on brand perception, convenience, packaging, and profit margins CVS charges a premium for the “pharmacy trust” factor You know what I call it? A scam

Wall Street Apes

838,764 views • 2 months ago