Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Larry Ellison reveals the $1B management wall that forced Oracle to replace almost its entire leadership team. "We hit a wall." "We reached a billion dollars in revenue." "The people who were running a billion dollar company were the same people that would run the company when we were...

214,278 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 33

Фото профиля Brady Sneath
Brady Sneath2 месяцев назад

Incredible sense of loyalty???

Фото профиля Goµlniky 🇺🇦
Goµlniky 🇺🇦2 месяцев назад

Understandable, but why didn’t he include himself then, wasn’t he as much part of the problem?

Фото профиля ShouldntBeOn
ShouldntBeOn2 месяцев назад

Some truth to this but getting rid of so much experience and company knowledge is risky

Фото профиля Surfing serf
Surfing serf2 месяцев назад

I know this on a much smaller scale

Фото профиля digitaledacia
digitaledacia2 месяцев назад

@grok what skills could he be talking about that’s different?

Фото профиля Opinador
Opinador2 месяцев назад

"I had an incredible sense of loyalty to those people."

Фото профиля Patrick O'Reilly
Patrick O'Reilly2 месяцев назад

I just looked back and Oracle has repeatedly hit walls of YoY revenue growth much much worse than a brief slow down in growth between 1990 and 1992 when revenue was growing through $1B. I have been using Oracle databases for over 25 years. They have built some great products over the years, but sometimes they just milk what they have and grow through acquisition. Fine. They are still around unlike many companies, but it seems like revisionist history to say they hit a wall at a billion in revenue. What about all the other years they had actual revenue declines?

Фото профиля Anabase67
Anabase672 месяцев назад

"I had an incredible sense of loyalty to those people." - Liar.

Фото профиля Steve E
Steve E2 месяцев назад

But there are one or two in that group who had the vision you didn't have and could scale to infinity. They get thrown out with the bathwater. Then the accountants and consultants come in. Let's be honest that line he drew keeps the stock market happy.

Фото профиля Cyril Gupta
Cyril Gupta2 месяцев назад

Growth changes the game. The team that builds the company must evolve with the company.

Фото профиля Land Artist
Land Artist2 месяцев назад

So true

Фото профиля Nico Fishie
Nico Fishie2 месяцев назад

We see this constantly. Founders rarely want to run process. When did you face this?

Фото профиля Harrison Vann
Harrison Vann2 месяцев назад

So true I find it’s more fun to be the guys that get kicked out after you scale it. There is a level of dog needed in the beginning that is no longer present when it gets corporate Then it’s systems and processes. Small changes make big impacts that have to go through 5 layers of people Nah

Фото профиля John F Kennedy
John F Kennedy2 месяцев назад

Snake

Фото профиля ✝︎ earth colours ⚙︎
✝︎ earth colours ⚙︎2 месяцев назад

Training was a thing back then, right?

Фото профиля bkv123
bkv1232 месяцев назад

What? It makes no sense!

Фото профиля Vivi
Vivi2 месяцев назад

And why is he still alive?

Фото профиля Leo Ayodele Iyegbu
Leo Ayodele Iyegbu2 месяцев назад

I know affordability one thing but does principles change because the target had been reached?

Фото профиля My Thoughts
My Thoughts2 месяцев назад

When this happened in Acrimony and he needed a new wife it was wrong lol, Black man always gone get judged smdh

Фото профиля EQIQ
EQIQ2 месяцев назад

The EQ dimension Ellison missed: the leaders who couldn't scale weren't bad — they had the wrong psychological profile for the next stage. 0→$50M rewards hustle and loyalty. $50M→$1B requires systems thinking and comfort with ambiguity. Different traits, not better ones.

Фото профиля 88kHz
88kHz2 месяцев назад

Larry has been praised by Elon as an me of the the most intelligent persons he knows. I am getting on his company for the AI boom.

Фото профиля ThePonderor
ThePonderor2 месяцев назад

Or they had too much equity

Фото профиля Mario Princess
Mario Princess2 месяцев назад

The scale ceiling is real. The team that builds the foundation isn't always the one to scale it. Hard lesson but so important!

Фото профиля Hai Nam
Hai Nam2 месяцев назад

Thanks for sharing, a small story but I can learn a lot to build my team

Фото профиля Nic
Nic2 месяцев назад

ellisons billion dollar wall story shows even legendary leadership teams age out of the job that made them successful.

Фото профиля James Curran
James Curran2 месяцев назад

THATS COP OUT BULLSHIT THE FURST $50 MILLION IS THE HARDEST

Фото профиля Brian Herren
Brian Herren2 месяцев назад

Used to work for an outfit which had hit that wall Worst was the finance team, Infested with people who had been around for ages, many never worked anywhere else Parochial low talent blockers whose sense of self importance was grotesque The clear out was brutal but essential

Фото профиля Dinnu daniel
Dinnu daniel2 месяцев назад

The quote is real, straight from Larry Ellison’s own words. The year attached to it and the number attached to it are both wrong, and the real numbers make the gap worse than the post let on. Full details…..​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Фото профиля Rio Wicaksono
Rio Wicaksono2 месяцев назад

yass

Фото профиля Ivo
Ivo2 месяцев назад

The hardest part of that wall wasn’t the org chart. It was admitting that loyalty and judgment are two different currencies, and a decade of one doesn’t buy you a single day of the other.

Фото профиля SJ Williams
SJ Williams2 месяцев назад

Old news. Like seriously old news.

Фото профиля Steve Sloan
Steve Sloan2 месяцев назад

he's coaching and he cares

Фото профиля Isaac, Amaterasu Ōmikami
Isaac, Amaterasu Ōmikami2 месяцев назад

it's the natural state of things. except you try to give them a chance to, might take longer tho.

Похожие видео

Marissa Mayer on scaling Google and the internal black market CEO Eric Schmidt created for new hires “One of the things that [former Google CEO Eric Schmidt] talked about a lot was that at every order of magnitude, you should expect every process to break—and you should expect to have to completely reinvent it. It’s very different to deal with tens of people versus hundreds of people versus thousands of people” Marissa shares a story of how one time Eric reinvented Google’s hiring process in a way that initially frustrated everyone: “We had closed the year at about 200 people, and we had a plan to double the size of the company over the coming year. Eric showed up in March, looked at the plan, and said: ‘there’s just no way you guys are going to be able to double the number of employees and keep the quality and culture the way you want it to be.’” Eric then told the company that he would let them collectively hire 50 people that year—versus the 200 they were planning on hiring. And to enforce this, he created 50 laminated dollar bills with Larry Page and Sergey Brin’s faces on them and distributed them to Google’s VPs. Every new hire that year would require one “Larry & Sergey” bill. Naturally, a black market for these “Larrys & Sergeys” developed, and as Marissa describes, it became surprisingly efficient: “What would happen is the Head of Sales would have one and he would really need a new feature to make a sale. So he would [say to the engineer]: ‘look, I’m going to give you this Larry & Sergey but you have to promise you’re going to use it to hire someone who is going to build this feature to secure this revenue.’” She continues: “As painful as it was because there was way too much work to slow down our hiring like this, [the new process] was actually a really good moment for the company because it made us be really thoughtful about how we were scaling and where we were putting our resources. We had to be that much more thoughtful about what to prioritize and where the opportunities were. Yes, hypergrowth is really fun, but you also need to realize that you want that hypergrowth to happen in terms of users and revenue—and not necessarily in terms of the size of the company.”

Startup Archive

162,101 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Elon Musk on raising capital: “You have to show investors that you’re all in” “Tesla almost died in 2008,” Elon explains. “The recession was particularly difficult for car companies, and in the summer of 2008 we had to raise a big funding round. But because of the collapse in the financial system, that funding round didn’t happen and we had to piece together money to keep the company going from myself and existing investors. We were able to complete a financing round that was just barely enough to keep the company going, and we closed it on the last hour of the last day that it was possible to do so. It was Christmas Eve 2008 at 6pm . . . and we would have run out of money a few days after Christmas.” Elon continues: “So while things are going really well these days, I think it’s always important to remember that when you’re creating a company, there are very dark times and it’s about getting through those dark times. That’s the difference between success and failure.” He offers the following advice to aspiring founders: “A company is a group of people gathered together to create a product or service. That’s really all a company is. So you have to really believe in what you’re creating and know in your heart and mind that this is something that matters and that the world ought to have.” Believing whole-heartedly in what your building is especially important for raising capital, Elon argues: “I think it’s important to show investors that you’re all in. For example with Tesla, the fact that I invested all the money I had and was all in — I literally had to borrow money from friends to pay rent in 2008 — made a huge difference to investors and convinced them to invest in Tesla at the same time that GM and Chrysler were going bankrupt. I think you have to show them that you really care, that you’ve got skin in the game, and that you’ve given it everything you’ve got. Then the other people at the company will follow suit, as will investors. I did that at both SpaceX and Tesla and think that’s really fundamental.” Elon also urges founders to only hire people who are passionate about what you’re building: “When you hire people, what you’re really trying to do is convince people to join you in the endeavor. You should hire people who are also passionate about what you’re doing . . . they need to really care about what they’re doing. Then they will stay during the dark times.”

Startup Archive

66,263 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Larry Ellison just bet his own company to buy his son a Hollywood empire. And a judge in Oakland could FREEZE the entire thing this afternoon. The deal is Paramount Skydance buying Warner Bros Discovery for about $110 billion, run by David Ellison, Larry's son. It would put two film studios, two streaming platforms, and two news organizations under one family. The problem: Warner's board did not want Paramount. It preferred a Netflix offer and called Paramount's financing illusory. So Larry Ellison put his own money behind his son. He gave an irrevocable guarantee covering $40.4 billion of the equity financing, and promised not to revoke the family trust or move its assets while the deal stayed pending. Paramount then published records to prove the trust holds 1.16 billion Oracle shares. Warner's board reversed and David Ellison won the biggest media merger in Hollywood history using his father's balance sheet as the proof of funds. That was the moment the two companies became one financial object. Because the guarantee is not cash. It is Oracle stock, and Oracle stock has been falling all year... Ellison owns 40.6% of Oracle. The company's crash has erased roughly $213 billion from his fortune and cut the share price by more than half. And Oracle's own filing shows 346 million of his shares were ALREADY pledged against personal debts as of September. He borrowed against the stock, then promised the same stock as backing for a $110 billion acquisition, while the stock was on its way down. Ellison turned Oracle into a hyperscaler by loading it with debt to chase AI data centers. Oracle became a major supplier of AI computing power to China. Job cuts have already been reported. In January, investors who bought $18 billion of Oracle senior notes filed a proposed class action in Manhattan against Ellison, senior executives, and the underwriting banks, over borrowing plans tied to AI that they say were not disclosed. So the debt that built the empire is now being litigated by the people who financed it, while the equity behind the guarantee shrinks. Then the states arrived: On July 13 a coalition of 12 attorneys general led by California sued to block the merger under Section 7 of the Clayton Act. On July 20 Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin issued a 14-day restraining order stopping the deal from closing, writing that the states had shown serious questions going to the merits remain. Paramount says the suit misrepresents competition in an entertainment industry now crowded with streamers. Today at 3pm in Oakland, the same judge hears the states' motion for a preliminary injunction. That is the hearing that matters, because when a judge grants an injunction, companies frequently walk away from the deal rather than fight through a full trial. When a judge denies one, they close within days. Delay is costing Paramount roughly $650 million a quarter, and the company has agreed to keep the deal open as late as June 1, 2027. So one family is holding a $110 billion acquisition open for possibly another 10 months, backed by shares in a company that is spending borrowed money faster than the AI revenue arrives. Larry Ellison spent his career selling databases to governments and betting the company on the next platform shift. He has been right almost every time. This time he pledged the proof of his own success to buy his son a studio, and a courtroom in Oakland decides if it freezes everything or not.

Ricardo

73,368 просмотров • 1 месяц назад