Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Last night on Rajdeep Sardesai show - master class by Milind Deora ! Don’t know why he doesn’t do more TV appearances!! In less than 90 seconds - 86 seconds to be precise - Milind Deora | मिलिंद देवरा calmly demolishes the UBT Sena narrative against Mahayuti Govt Must...

280,914 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Lotus 🪷🇮🇳's profile picture
Lotus 🪷🇮🇳1 year ago

One of my favourite politicians,I have very high hopes from @milinddeora a young nd dynamic leader who is educated nd has worked on ground , he will go places,but he has to shed his gentle image nd become aggressive as now he is dealing with such hardened nd sinister ppl,laato ke bhoot baato se nahin maante.

The Sanghi's profile picture
The Sanghi1 year ago

@sardesairajdeep @milinddeora its all very complicated, half of that Shiv Sena must be in alliance with BJP now that he is referring to . Maharashtra politics is such a chaos that no-one can accuse anyone of anything, as everyone has been with everybody for power

Priyanka M K's profile picture
Priyanka M K1 year ago

@sardesairajdeep @milinddeora I have always liked this guy....I always thought Congress would give him bigger responsibility and authority on past,but as usual Congress can't see anything beyond inefficiency and inability of Unqualified heir apparent Rahul Gandhi!Thankfully Milind Deora left Congress

Bhaskar Mishra's profile picture
Bhaskar Mishra1 year ago

@sardesairajdeep @milinddeora

sanjayjalaan's profile picture
sanjayjalaan1 year ago

@sardesairajdeep @milinddeora And the india today Prime reporter of Congress couldn’t handle the truth. His body language was as if he wanted to hide somewhere.

0mNam0's profile picture
0mNam01 year ago

@sardesairajdeep @milinddeora @mieknathshinde sir he should be send everyday to TV debates, he is indeed a great asset and will help your party

Savio Cardoz's profile picture
Savio Cardoz1 year ago

@sardesairajdeep @milinddeora Beta Shehzad aap aisa hi tapasya karo lekin aap ko ticket nahi milega bolo jai bamboo 😂😝🤣

Aravind🇮🇳🚩's profile picture
Aravind🇮🇳🚩1 year ago

@sardesairajdeep @milinddeora But Husband of TMC MP doesn’t seems to be happy accepting the facts. His wife BLINDLY believes whatever Canada says but Husband won’t believe what Indian Govt say.

Vijay 🇮🇳's profile picture
Vijay 🇮🇳1 year ago

@sardesairajdeep @milinddeora Congress only keeps 💩, no challenge to leadership. Those they feel as challenge to leadership, either they die in mysterious way or ask to leave . Now only remaining is PILOT .

Rajendra Kulkarni's profile picture
Rajendra Kulkarni1 year ago

@sardesairajdeep @milinddeora Super. He should be frequent on such debates. Very nice way of presenting views without any hue and cry.

Related Videos

Putting the entire debate I had this evening on IndiaToday out- no edits, no cuts- full debate. Do watch & see THE DEBATE ENDED WITH ABUSES HURLED AT ME BY Rajdeep Sardesai - CALLED ME CRETIN, LOW LEVEL Here’s what happened.. 1) Despite me requesting Rajdeep Sardesai to let me complete- which he did not do last evening - he again interrupts me within 20 seconds of my first remarks after his long opening - literally within 20 seconds!! ((It was not a fact check )) 2) I call out Rajdeep jovially , without any anger, for his constant interruptions and wonder why he needs to peddle a congress narrative rather than hear me fully. 3) Preeti, far from stopping him, starts behaving rudely & says I was on her show to seek “2 mins of fame” not aware of the fact that BJP assigns us- we don’t get to choose & also forgetting that her show is the last place one would get fame - for that people need to watch her show THE SAME PREETI , RAJDEEP NOT ONCE INTERJECT SANJAY JHA FOR HIS VERBAL DIATRIBE ON PM Narendra Modi LABELLING HIM DICTATORIAL & FASCIST! She shouts at me because I request Rajdeep to not be biased and interrupt me constantly when I was fact checking them and defending my party and leader. 4) Rajdeep continues to interrupt when Preeti assures me 45 seconds- dramatically puts on a timer- Rajdeep still interrupts me in 14 seconds! Preeti watches on… 5) Preeti screams at me. Multiple times. Literally screams.. I remind her we should be courteous but it has no effect. 6) Rajdeep gets an ending comment which I am not allowed to counter.. (Panel was Sanjay Jha, Rajdeep, Me & of course the anchor Preeti) 7) Preeti closes show, without allowing me even 10 seconds to respond to Rajdeep and twists my statement on 7 days aspect and completely misquotes me ( Do watch the debate till the end to see if that is what I said and HOW SHE COMPLETELY MISQUOTES- it isn’t even funny leave alone ethical) 8) After the debate, when cameras go off, Rajdeep hurls abuses at me- calls me a cretin and low level. (Shouts at me along the hall way and elevator even as I tell him I do not wish to talk ) - I am sure other cameras have captured this. Rajdeep in the past has asked Sambit Patra to shut up, allowed Supriya Srinate to call me a goon on national tv and justified it. (Videos are available ) The full debate is here for everyone to see Aroon Purie supriya prasad - unedited Dear Aroon ji, 1) Can your journalist , for any reason, call me cretin and low level? Let us assume I am completely wrong- even then is this justified? Is it a crime for me keep the version my party trusts me to? 2) Can your anchor say I am here for two mins of fame when my party has chosen to send me? Same anchor does not stop Sanjay Jha once for making most despicable comments on PM Narendra Modi but if I defend my party and leader I am abused? 3) Can your anchor twist my words and misquote me blatantly at the end? 4) If somebody interrupts every fifteen seconds and I call out their pro-Congress tilt- This is what is being justified by abusing and shouting at me ? Merely because I wish to factually rebut allegations thrown at my party? The full debate is here for everyone to see & decide. Link : BJP Anil Baluni

Shehzad Jai Hind

3,485,729 views • 3 years ago

Last evening Rajdeep Sardesai was so desperate to peddle Sonia Gandhi’s narrative that he refused to listen to facts : ( his lousy arguments were taken to the cleaners nonetheless) 1) that he was comparing CELEBRATORY FUNCTIONS in Parliament to sessions envisaged under Article 85 of the Constitution. 2) He kept interrupting me when I was quoting the Constitutional & Parliamentary Rules & cited him examples of how there was no precedence of pre-facto consultation before a Session is summoned even under his favourite UPA! 3) He then shifted the goalpost to “conventions” when he or Achary couldn’t cite which Rule / Proviso was violated or how he presumed the agenda wouldn’t be discussed at an appropriate stage & time , as is done, by the Speaker & again cited “Celebratory functions”! 4) He kept calling it secretive when his own channel has shared at least 4-5 agenda items for the same session! Kya secret hai bhai!! 5) Rajdeep is entitled to his views even if they come from Jairam Ramesh directly. But why heckle? The same Rajdeep doesn’t interrupt with half the vigour & half as much when he has a Congress spokesperson speaking.. they can pretty much peddle all kinds of rubbish without interruptions.. notice it in all debates… even last evening suspended Sanjay Jha was allowed to go fully unhinged! 6) Official Congress was missing (unable to face facts) in the debate but Rajdeep,Sanjay & Achary tried to fill in! Interruptions aside, it doesn’t take more than 5 minutes to expose them. Enjoy! Video ShotPointBlank

Shehzad Jai Hind

471,144 views • 3 years ago

𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐛𝐞𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐑𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬? Last night, the Mysuru Darbhanga Express Train hit a stationary goods train in Tamil Nadu & 12 coaches got derailed. Reason is alleged to be that the passenger train was directed on a loop line instead of the main line. This DEMOLISHES the ridiculous theory being propagated by Rail Min Ashwini Vaishnaw since weeks that “train derailments are being done by ISIS terrorists”. An anti-collision system like KAVACH would’ve prevented this mishap. But guess what - KAVACH is operational on LESS THAN 2% of Indian Rail network despite the technology being introduced in 2016. It’s taken the Modi Govt 8 years to cover just 2% of the network. The mysterious questions are: 👉 WHY is rail safety being ignored constantly & shamelessly by the Modi Govt? 👉 Why does Ashwini Vaishnaw continue to be rail minister despite an accident happening almost every week? 👉 Why does India NOT HAVE A FULL-TIME Rail Minister? 👉 Why is Modi in a rush to launch new “high speed” trains everyday when the safety of railways is rock bottom making these trains extremely risky? Railways is being ignored because it’s mostly the poor & lower middle class who travel on it. This shameless disregard for the lives of lakhs of Indians is pathetic. The pathetic condition of Indian Railways currently wouldn’t be acceptable in any civilized democracy. What exactly is the sinister game of Modi & Ashwini Vaishnaw? Why is there no action against Ashwini Vaishnaw despite regular train accidents? Who is the Modi Govt trying to enrich by destroying Indian Railways?

Saket Gokhale

27,902 views • 1 year ago

🚨 The lengths some media outlets go to slander Drake should be studied. 🧐 The Breakfast Club wants people to believe every caller is some random person who just happened to get through. Meanwhile, they’re now broadcasting live on Netflix. You really think they’re risking random callers saying anything they want on a platform that big? 🤔 🔎 This Alleged “Toronto caller” claiming Drake doesn’t do anything for the city sounded suspicious from the start. She doesn’t even sound like she’s from Toronto, yet we’re supposed to believe she’s speaking for the city? 👀 What’s even more telling is how Charlamagne handled the conversation. Instead of challenging any of the claims, he suddenly plays the neutral, unbiased host role: 🗣️ Caller: “Drake isn’t as popular as y’all think in Toronto.” 🗣️ Charlamagne: “I don’t know, he streams a lot. He sells out tours.” 🗣️ Caller: “He’s never done anything for Toronto. Never helped hospitals, homeless people, schools, nothing.” 🗣️ Charlamagne: “Well, I can’t tell you about your city. You know more than me.” Notice how the setup works. The caller gets to make a bunch of negative claims, while Charlamagne acts detached so it doesn’t look like the show is pushing the narrative themselves. The problem is it feels way too convenient. A caller magically gets through to bash Drake, makes a series of claims with no pushback, and the hosts act surprised while allowing the message to reach millions of viewers. Maybe some people will believe it was random. I don’t. This looked more like a planned narrative than an organic call-in moment The Fact That They Used This Phone Call Clip On Their Social Media Is Telling In Itself… Out Of Every Clip Out Of The Show They Used This To Start A Narrative And To Get Engagement. My Opinion This Was A Structured Call In..

Cousin Tino ™️

162,085 views • 2 months ago

Mbappe does not have the IQ to play football “very” effectively without his speed. Calm, and don’t drag me yet. Do you know why Messi is still effective at his age despite being slower? It’s because he has learned how to play football without having to run too much. At some point, Mbappe’s speed will reduce, but he doesn’t have that much IQ to survive so much without it. On dead ball situations where he doesn’t have to run, just watch, he’s less effective. He can’t drop a mad line-breaking pass, he can’t wiggle around players. I mean, anything that doesn’t involve his speed, he’s less effective. Of course he’s done a lot without his speed, but he’s less potent, I hope you don’t misunderstand this part. Mbappe is deadliest on transition. Same with Barcola and Dembele. If a team is in shape, these guys are not effective, e.g Paraguay…you can also see the France team, they don’t intend to keep the ball, their only plan is to wait for you to lose it and they play it to those 4 guys, you are finished. Please listen to Thierry Henry. He said he was so quick and relied on his speed, a coach had to tell him at some point to play without his speed. This made him think more and play more with his brain. As Mbappe grows, his speed will slow down, he still has more than 10 years to play, and I hope he can learn that part where he can be effective without speed. Cristiano scored more after 30 years old when his speed had reduced. I hope you guys get my point, I know many will still misunderstand it.

TobyWrites

1,235,988 views • 1 month ago

Chris Cuomo is in rare form tonight. He began his show on NewsNation by calling out the Democrat members of Congress who told the military to stand down from orders. Cuomo said if the Democrats don’t reset: “We are asking for BIG trouble.” He began: “Right or wrong?” “This? Wrong!” “All day long.” “Ahhhh, he’s MAGA!” “Shut up!” “Uhhhh.” “And if you watch show, I said last night when it came out, it was wrong to put the duty to check a president on the troops. It’s on you!” “You have a constitutional duty. What an ugly irony that it’s members of Congress asking this, it should be citizens who might be asking that.” “You’re supposed to check, it’s why you raised your right hand.” “But what is it about now? They’re looking for a fight. Why? Because you want them to! Because you want a muscular response to Trump.” “You want stop walking all over you. You want stop getting away with everything and him call in the game all the time and controlling everything, you want a muscular response.” “That’s why you want Newsom on Twitter. You know, because acting all acting like fools, we’re all acting like fools.” “Why? Because we know I guess we don’t know any better and more. But I know we’re playing with fire and I know worse is to come on this course.” “I don’t like it. I don’t want it. I would leave my family, I will enter unsafe conditions to cover it. But if we don’t reset and fast. We are asking for big trouble.”

Overton

308,865 views • 9 months ago

🚨 If Erika Kirk ever cared about Charlie Kirk, she would be publicly sounding the alarm. Last night, Candace Owens released unedited footage that is substantially better quality than the footage provided by authorities in the case against Tyler Robinson. This exclusive, high-quality footage, obtained from an anonymous government source, should have vindicated the official narrative against Tyler Robinson. However, it failed to do so. The person in the footage bears no resemblance to Tyler Robinson. Baron Coleman and many others are more convinced than ever that Tyler Robinson is being framed for the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The man in the footage is not skinny; he appears far more muscular and robust than Tyler Robinson. The man by all metrics appears to be left-handed. He even put an earpiece in his left ear. This isn't 2005; who wears an earpiece in public?! You can clearly see that the man is wearing white leggings or thigh-high white socks under his shorts. Authorities never mentioned leggings or thigh-high socks. Furthermore, it’s quite possible that a ponytail could be hiding underneath his hat, considering the way he’s wearing it. Why is this of interest? Lance Twiggs, Tyler’s roommate whose less degraded DNA was found on every piece of evidence against Tyler Robinson, has a ponytail. Why didn’t our government release this high-quality footage, which is obviously available? Why does it seem that authorities deliberately degraded the footage presented in court? Why is this evidence coming from not only a podcaster but also a pregnant mother of four who works out of her basement in Nashville, Tennessee? Why are TPUSA and Erika Kirk completely silent?! Why aren't Erika Kirk, Andrew Kolvet, and Tyler Bowyer on Fox News asking what the hell is going on here?! Everyone should be demanding answers for who actually killed Charlie Kirk, but Erika Kirk and every individual at TPUSA should be at the forefront of demanding answers for this blatant and evident failure of our law enforcement institutions.

Travis

104,800 views • 15 days ago

The first scene for 2010’s “The Social Network" is ~6 minutes. It shows Mark Zuckerberg getting dumped in a Harvard bar (and with some creative licenses, how that leads to Facebook). Director David Fincher did 99 takes of the scene (yes, 99). For some, that's Fincher being a perfectionist. For others, it's Fincher wasting people's time. Aaron Sorkin wrote the screenplay and has a fascinating recollection of the scene: ➡️ "An average screenplay is about 120 pages long. My screenplays have higher page counts because there’s more dialogue and less action. By the rules of screenplay format, dialogue takes up more room on the page and less time on the screen than action (which takes up less room on the page and more time on the screen). "The Social Network" was 178 pages. And the studio said, “OK, the first thing you’ve got to do is figure out a way to cut 30 pages from this.” And David said, “I don’t think so.” […] He came over to my house with his iPhone set on stopwatch mode, and he said, “I want you to read the entire script out loud for me, at the pace you heard it in your head when you were writing it, and I’m going to write down the timing of each scene.” So that opening scene...with Jesse Eisenberg (Zuck) and Rooney Mara. I read it and it was 7 minutes and 22 seconds. In rehearsal, Jesse and Rooney would rehearse the scene, David would say great, and he would give them a couple of notes and always end with, “But this scene is 7 minutes and 22 seconds long, and you’re doing it at 7 minutes and 40 seconds. So I don’t care how, but you’re going to have to talk faster somewhere, because I promise you, this scene plays best at 7 minutes and 22 seconds.” ⬅️ With that context, the 99 takes is very understandable. It’s a combo of perfectionism and managing the shooting budget. The final cut was shorter than 7 minutes and 22 seconds. But one thing stayed consistent throughout the shoot: Fincher told dozens of extras in the bar scene to keep the volume of their chatter high, as they would on any night out. This forced Eisenberg and Mara not only to speak faster. But also louder, increasing the scene’s intensity. It worked.

Trung Phan

3,122,881 views • 2 years ago

The Social Network sequel also won’t have David Fincher. His directing style great combo with Sorkin’s dialogue-heavy script. Social Network’s opening scene is perfect example: it’s ~5 minutes and Fincher famously did 99 takes. It shows Zuck getting dumped in a Harvard bar (and with some creative licenses, how that leads to Facebook). Sorkin — who will direct the sequel — talked about how the scene came together: ➡️ "An average screenplay is about 120 pages long. My screenplays have higher page counts because there’s more dialogue and less action. By the rules of screenplay format, dialogue takes up more room on the page and less time on the screen than action (which takes up less room on the page and more time on the screen). "The Social Network" was 178 pages. And the studio said, “OK, the first thing you’ve got to do is figure out a way to cut 30 pages from this.” And David said, “I don’t think so.” […] He came over to my house with his iPhone set on stopwatch mode, and he said, “I want you to read the entire script out loud for me, at the pace you heard it in your head when you were writing it, and I’m going to write down the timing of each scene.” So that opening scene...with Jesse Eisenberg (Zuck) and Rooney Mara. I read it and it was 7 minutes and 22 seconds. In rehearsal, Jesse and Rooney would rehearse the scene, David would say great, and he would give them a couple of notes and always end with, “But this scene is 7 minutes and 22 seconds long, and you’re doing it at 7 minutes and 40 seconds. So I don’t care how, but you’re going to have to talk faster somewhere, because I promise you, this scene plays best at 7 minutes and 22 seconds.” ⬅️ The final cut was quite a bit shorter than 7 minutes and 22 seconds. But one thing stayed consistent throughout the shoot: Fincher told dozens of extras in the bar scene to keep the volume of their chatter high, as they would on any night out. This forced Eisenberg and Mara not only to speak faster. But also louder, increasing the scene’s intensity. IT WORKED REAL WELL!! *** Full interview with Sorkin here:

Trung Phan

57,943 views • 2 months ago