Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Last week, Flexport released an AI agent that can audit bills from shippers and truckers against the actual logs to ensure its customers are invoiced correctly. The product was just an idea 3 days before. "We probably pivoted 30% to 40% of our engineers now just to building agents,"...

alexrkonrad's profile picture

Alex Konrad

90,485 subscribers

122,071 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразованиеНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Flexport CEO Ryan Petersen still thinks about a 2012 essay written by Paul Graham called 'Schlep Blindness.' Every startup founder of a certain era of went through the misery of applying to accept credit card payments. But only Patrick and John Collison (Patrick Collison and John Collison) started Stripe. "There was a $100 billion opportunity available to every entrepreneur," says Petersen. "The worst problems in your life, your conscious brain is unable to focus, to think about them at all. You're just completely blind that this problem exists." More recently, Petersen (Ryan Petersen) says that PG (Paul Graham) has described his company, Flexport, the same way. "Anyone who ever imported anything wen through this pain, saw it's a nightmare to fill out paperwork, and no one call tell you where your stuff is, or when it's going to arrive." Catch the full discussion on The Upstarts Podcast 👇 YouTube: Spotify: Apple:
1:30

Flexport CEO Ryan Petersen still thinks about a 2012 essay written by Paul Graham called 'Schlep Blindness.' Every startup founder of a certain era of went through the misery of applying to accept credit card payments. But only Patrick and John Collison (Patrick Collison and John Collison) started Stripe. "There was a $100 billion opportunity available to every entrepreneur," says Petersen. "The worst problems in your life, your conscious brain is unable to focus, to think about them at all. You're just completely blind that this problem exists." More recently, Petersen (Ryan Petersen) says that PG (Paul Graham) has described his company, Flexport, the same way. "Anyone who ever imported anything wen through this pain, saw it's a nightmare to fill out paperwork, and no one call tell you where your stuff is, or when it's going to arrive." Catch the full discussion on The Upstarts Podcast 👇 YouTube: Spotify: Apple:

Alex Konrad

69,560 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Ryan Petersen on what Paul Graham told him when he stepped down as Flexport CEO Y Combinator founder Paul Graham was Flexport’s first investor. Ryan Petersen recalls telling Paul that he was hiring Amazon’s Dave Clark to replace him as CEO in 2022: “No one has ever been more disappointed in me than when I told PG that I was hiring a CEO,” Ryan remembers. Paul first asked Ryan if Flexport was his life’s work, to which he answered “Yes.” “Then why would you ever leave?” Paul asked. Ryan said he thought the new CEO would be better for the company. “That’s like saying some other guy is going to be a better husband for your wife!” PG exclaimed. “It might be true, but you don’t act on it!” Then PG offered Ryan the following advice: “If this is your life’s work, and you think he’s better than you. You need to go learn all of the things that he’s better than you at so that you can come back and do the job.” And that’s exactly what Ryan did. After a year, he returned as CEO of Flexport. Source: Kleiner Perkins (Apr 2025)
1:35

Ryan Petersen on what Paul Graham told him when he stepped down as Flexport CEO Y Combinator founder Paul Graham was Flexport’s first investor. Ryan Petersen recalls telling Paul that he was hiring Amazon’s Dave Clark to replace him as CEO in 2022: “No one has ever been more disappointed in me than when I told PG that I was hiring a CEO,” Ryan remembers. Paul first asked Ryan if Flexport was his life’s work, to which he answered “Yes.” “Then why would you ever leave?” Paul asked. Ryan said he thought the new CEO would be better for the company. “That’s like saying some other guy is going to be a better husband for your wife!” PG exclaimed. “It might be true, but you don’t act on it!” Then PG offered Ryan the following advice: “If this is your life’s work, and you think he’s better than you. You need to go learn all of the things that he’s better than you at so that you can come back and do the job.” And that’s exactly what Ryan did. After a year, he returned as CEO of Flexport. Source: Kleiner Perkins (Apr 2025)

Startup Archive

45,553 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Ryan Petersen on what Paul Graham told him when he stepped down as Flexport CEO Y Combinator founder Paul Graham was Flexport’s first investor. Ryan Petersen recalls telling Paul that he was hiring Amazon’s Dave Clark to replace him as CEO in 2022: “No one has ever been more disappointed in me than when I told PG that I was hiring a CEO,” Ryan remembers. Paul first asked Ryan if Flexport was his life’s work, to which he answered “Yes.” “Then why would you ever leave?” Paul asked. Ryan said he thought the new CEO would be better for the company. “That’s like saying some other guy is going to be a better husband for your wife!” PG exclaimed. “It might be true, but you don’t act on it!” Then PG offered Ryan the following advice: “If this is your life’s work, and you think he’s better than you. You need to go learn all of the things that he’s better than you at so that you can come back and do the job.” And that’s exactly what Ryan did. After a year, he returned as CEO of Flexport. Video source: Kleiner Perkins (2025)
1:35

Ryan Petersen on what Paul Graham told him when he stepped down as Flexport CEO Y Combinator founder Paul Graham was Flexport’s first investor. Ryan Petersen recalls telling Paul that he was hiring Amazon’s Dave Clark to replace him as CEO in 2022: “No one has ever been more disappointed in me than when I told PG that I was hiring a CEO,” Ryan remembers. Paul first asked Ryan if Flexport was his life’s work, to which he answered “Yes.” “Then why would you ever leave?” Paul asked. Ryan said he thought the new CEO would be better for the company. “That’s like saying some other guy is going to be a better husband for your wife!” PG exclaimed. “It might be true, but you don’t act on it!” Then PG offered Ryan the following advice: “If this is your life’s work, and you think he’s better than you. You need to go learn all of the things that he’s better than you at so that you can come back and do the job.” And that’s exactly what Ryan did. After a year, he returned as CEO of Flexport. Video source: Kleiner Perkins (2025)

Startup Archive

146,019 просмотров • 1 год назад

Logistics is a multi-trillion-dollar industry that quietly powers the entire global economy — and it's shockingly manual. Ryan Petersen (Ryan Petersen), founder & CEO of Flexport, joins the Lightcone Podcast to break down how AI is finally touching the physical world: making shipping cheaper, speeding up global trade, and automating work that used to live inside emails, spreadsheets, and phone calls. 03:17 - When did AI tools become serious at the company 06:27 - The benefit of internal hackathons 12:03 - What internal AI projects have been most impactful at Flexport 14:40 - What software can do better and faster in logistics 19:08 - Goods get cheaper if more logistics get automated 21:18 - The spiritual/philosophical implications of AI in society 23:51 - How does AI change the model structure for companies? 26:38 - Would Ryan have built Flexport differently today?
33:40

Logistics is a multi-trillion-dollar industry that quietly powers the entire global economy — and it's shockingly manual. Ryan Petersen (Ryan Petersen), founder & CEO of Flexport, joins the Lightcone Podcast to break down how AI is finally touching the physical world: making shipping cheaper, speeding up global trade, and automating work that used to live inside emails, spreadsheets, and phone calls. 03:17 - When did AI tools become serious at the company 06:27 - The benefit of internal hackathons 12:03 - What internal AI projects have been most impactful at Flexport 14:40 - What software can do better and faster in logistics 19:08 - Goods get cheaper if more logistics get automated 21:18 - The spiritual/philosophical implications of AI in society 23:51 - How does AI change the model structure for companies? 26:38 - Would Ryan have built Flexport differently today?

Y Combinator

153,254 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Flexport CEO Ryan Petersen: There's been an explosion in customs fraud since Liberation Day "The way it works: the US is the only country that allows foreign companies to import goods into the country, with no legal entity, no requirement to have an employee locally." "You can just import stuff into the country as a foreign company. And then you just lie on your declarations." "These companies just cheat and there's basically no consequence."
3:12

Flexport CEO Ryan Petersen: There's been an explosion in customs fraud since Liberation Day "The way it works: the US is the only country that allows foreign companies to import goods into the country, with no legal entity, no requirement to have an employee locally." "You can just import stuff into the country as a foreign company. And then you just lie on your declarations." "These companies just cheat and there's basically no consequence."

TBPN

100,486 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang says the rule for shipping AI is the same rule as shipping an omelet "And in doing so, if it's not ready, just hold it back. You should go as fast as you can, but no faster than that." "At the moment, the incidents are related to products not ready to be released. This is no different than, you know, an omelet's not ready to be released, or a car's not ready to be released, an airplane engine not ready to be released. You should properly test it, you have rigorous testing systems." "The testing lab should be contained and products should not be released to the public until it's ready to be used by the public." "And that's engineering, good old-fashioned engineering. It's not more than that, it's not less than that. And so we have to just go back to core engineering, make sure that we have the rigor of testing these products properly before we release it to the public." _______ Link and more from AI-safety related conversations:
0:45

Jensen Huang says the rule for shipping AI is the same rule as shipping an omelet "And in doing so, if it's not ready, just hold it back. You should go as fast as you can, but no faster than that." "At the moment, the incidents are related to products not ready to be released. This is no different than, you know, an omelet's not ready to be released, or a car's not ready to be released, an airplane engine not ready to be released. You should properly test it, you have rigorous testing systems." "The testing lab should be contained and products should not be released to the public until it's ready to be used by the public." "And that's engineering, good old-fashioned engineering. It's not more than that, it's not less than that. And so we have to just go back to core engineering, make sure that we have the rigor of testing these products properly before we release it to the public." _______ Link and more from AI-safety related conversations:

Fireside Alpha

265,929 просмотров • 17 дней назад

.Mati Staniszewski on The Future of Human-AI Interaction: “Voice will 100% will be one of the biggest ways you interact with AI.” “AI will be able to connect the IQ plus the EQ part of it. It will be able to emotionally understand you. It will know how you're feeling and can adjust based on that. It can pause and can think and can reinsert itself into the conversation.” “Voice is the most primal way we communicate and now we can bring technology back on our terms.” “So 12 months from now I think AI will be able to understand us in an incredibly better way —both our knowledge and emotional part. And deliver similar conversation to the one we are having now.”
1:35

.Mati Staniszewski on The Future of Human-AI Interaction: “Voice will 100% will be one of the biggest ways you interact with AI.” “AI will be able to connect the IQ plus the EQ part of it. It will be able to emotionally understand you. It will know how you're feeling and can adjust based on that. It can pause and can think and can reinsert itself into the conversation.” “Voice is the most primal way we communicate and now we can bring technology back on our terms.” “So 12 months from now I think AI will be able to understand us in an incredibly better way —both our knowledge and emotional part. And deliver similar conversation to the one we are having now.”

David Senra

11,582 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Airtable's Howie Liu says that basically everyone will need to graduate from being ICs to ICs that manage teams of 20-30 agents: "The best developers today don't just sit there in front of their IDEs and synchronously talk to their agent." "[Instead], you have like 30 separate branches that are each being worked on by a different agent. And you can have the agents continue to update the branches based on human and other agent feedback." "And I think this whole idea of it taking hours for that entire loop to complete — agent pushes some changes, the changes get feedback from other agents or humans, the agent responds to that — that whole loop could be hours, not just minutes. So you're not going to just sit there and watch it one at a time." "But the powerful thing about this is, each one is still actually operating faster than a human engineer. One agent on one branch can do the work of maybe three humans, operating 3x as fast. So it's like a 10x leverage factor just for one agent." "But the best engineers are now able to multitask and say, 'I'm going to oversee my own little team of 20-30 agents working concurrently.'" "Everyone needs to graduate from being an IC to an IC manager of agents. Meaning, if you're a VC analyst, your job should no longer be to go synchronously research one company. You need to go and research like 30 companies, and do them all faster, better, and higher quality than you could before." "That's the greatest leap that is going to be challenging for a lot of people in a lot of roles. Because it's a totally different mentality in how you operate, and what your role is."
1:56

Airtable's Howie Liu says that basically everyone will need to graduate from being ICs to ICs that manage teams of 20-30 agents: "The best developers today don't just sit there in front of their IDEs and synchronously talk to their agent." "[Instead], you have like 30 separate branches that are each being worked on by a different agent. And you can have the agents continue to update the branches based on human and other agent feedback." "And I think this whole idea of it taking hours for that entire loop to complete — agent pushes some changes, the changes get feedback from other agents or humans, the agent responds to that — that whole loop could be hours, not just minutes. So you're not going to just sit there and watch it one at a time." "But the powerful thing about this is, each one is still actually operating faster than a human engineer. One agent on one branch can do the work of maybe three humans, operating 3x as fast. So it's like a 10x leverage factor just for one agent." "But the best engineers are now able to multitask and say, 'I'm going to oversee my own little team of 20-30 agents working concurrently.'" "Everyone needs to graduate from being an IC to an IC manager of agents. Meaning, if you're a VC analyst, your job should no longer be to go synchronously research one company. You need to go and research like 30 companies, and do them all faster, better, and higher quality than you could before." "That's the greatest leap that is going to be challenging for a lot of people in a lot of roles. Because it's a totally different mentality in how you operate, and what your role is."

TBPN

35,595 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Flexport CEO Ryan Petersen explains why your initial vision for your company is probably wrong When Ryan first applied to Y Combinator he wanted Flexport to be “TurboTax for customs.” But that vision changed a lot. As Ryan explains: “The more you learn and the more customers you talk to and the more vendors you talk to, the more you realize how screwed up the world is in this space. Then [the vision] actually gets bigger and bigger and keeps expanding.” Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan says this is a common pattern he sees in startups too: “There’s a misconception that you wake up from a haze and you’re like ‘This is it. This is the vision.” But the story is actually ‘Oh here’s this thing that I know I can solve.’ And then once you solve it and people really like it, it sort of expands and expands.” Ryan concludes: “If a founder is too certain of exactly what the vision is and what the product’s going to look like and how it’s all going to work, they’re probably wrong. The world is super messy.” Source: Garry Tan (Mar 2022)
0:54

Flexport CEO Ryan Petersen explains why your initial vision for your company is probably wrong When Ryan first applied to Y Combinator he wanted Flexport to be “TurboTax for customs.” But that vision changed a lot. As Ryan explains: “The more you learn and the more customers you talk to and the more vendors you talk to, the more you realize how screwed up the world is in this space. Then [the vision] actually gets bigger and bigger and keeps expanding.” Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan says this is a common pattern he sees in startups too: “There’s a misconception that you wake up from a haze and you’re like ‘This is it. This is the vision.” But the story is actually ‘Oh here’s this thing that I know I can solve.’ And then once you solve it and people really like it, it sort of expands and expands.” Ryan concludes: “If a founder is too certain of exactly what the vision is and what the product’s going to look like and how it’s all going to work, they’re probably wrong. The world is super messy.” Source: Garry Tan (Mar 2022)

Startup Archive

26,519 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

An AI agent broke out of its sandboxes. The vulnerabilities it used were already public. "Our recommendation to providers in the ClusterMAX rankings is literally just keep your stuff up to date. If there are existing vulnerabilities that have been described publicly in popular software, this could be anything from Docker to the NVIDIA driver to Kubernetes or the Linux kernel. Clearly people, and in this case agents, can just read that description and then build an exploit from it."
1:58

An AI agent broke out of its sandboxes. The vulnerabilities it used were already public. "Our recommendation to providers in the ClusterMAX rankings is literally just keep your stuff up to date. If there are existing vulnerabilities that have been described publicly in popular software, this could be anything from Docker to the NVIDIA driver to Kubernetes or the Linux kernel. Clearly people, and in this case agents, can just read that description and then build an exploit from it."

SemiAnalysis

25,529 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

$FIG CEO Dylan Field describes the AI psychosis he's been seeing among engineers lately: "It feels like there's a lot of tunnel vision right now. Especially for engineers." "[People] get very latched on to an idea. Then the AI psychosis sets in. And you're like, 'This is the best idea ever.' And you're fully tunnel-visioned towards creating it." "And you can show massive progress. But are you going in the right direction?" "I think it's really important to steer, and to actually be building what you need to build. And to think — not just wear a thinking cap."
0:57

$FIG CEO Dylan Field describes the AI psychosis he's been seeing among engineers lately: "It feels like there's a lot of tunnel vision right now. Especially for engineers." "[People] get very latched on to an idea. Then the AI psychosis sets in. And you're like, 'This is the best idea ever.' And you're fully tunnel-visioned towards creating it." "And you can show massive progress. But are you going in the right direction?" "I think it's really important to steer, and to actually be building what you need to build. And to think — not just wear a thinking cap."

TBPN

48,758 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

A lot of companies forward deploy engineers —Cognition forward deployed their entire company. Scott Wu says he flew the entire company to Brazil to make sure Devin worked: “ Our entire team was the forward-deployed team. We all flew to Brazil.” “ It was the first case. Let's be real here—agents did not work generally. So it was a lot of: how do you make it work for a very specific company?” “It was literally like, "Okay, let's go through all these different things that you guys think could make sense. Let's go through each one. Let's try some of it manually ourselves to understand what the task looks like. Let's see if we can teach Devin to do this correctly and build in the right kind of orchestration for Devin to be able to do this.” “ Basically building the product was almost like building it for one company.” This strategy worked: Nubank was Cognition’s first customer success.
1:15

A lot of companies forward deploy engineers —Cognition forward deployed their entire company. Scott Wu says he flew the entire company to Brazil to make sure Devin worked: “ Our entire team was the forward-deployed team. We all flew to Brazil.” “ It was the first case. Let's be real here—agents did not work generally. So it was a lot of: how do you make it work for a very specific company?” “It was literally like, "Okay, let's go through all these different things that you guys think could make sense. Let's go through each one. Let's try some of it manually ourselves to understand what the task looks like. Let's see if we can teach Devin to do this correctly and build in the right kind of orchestration for Devin to be able to do this.” “ Basically building the product was almost like building it for one company.” This strategy worked: Nubank was Cognition’s first customer success.

David Senra

93,639 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Video showcasing the new updated intervention screen. Again I love the idea, but I really do not think this is the way to capture data from people. It’s just too intrusive and will throw people off. Some ideas: - It needs to be a smaller window that you can press to expand (and see the intervention reasons) - It should go away on its own after x seconds - something related to destination parking would be a good option? - voice note should just be one of the options in the list rather than an entire separate pop up - the mockup that ΛI DRIVR showed would be the absolute best way to handle this. You can observe all of your disengagements at the end of your drive and then you can go through and take the time to tag it all properly. As it is now I would guess 75% of people are just going to hit an option at random to dismiss the popup. Tesla AI Ashok Elluswamy
0:42

Video showcasing the new updated intervention screen. Again I love the idea, but I really do not think this is the way to capture data from people. It’s just too intrusive and will throw people off. Some ideas: - It needs to be a smaller window that you can press to expand (and see the intervention reasons) - It should go away on its own after x seconds - something related to destination parking would be a good option? - voice note should just be one of the options in the list rather than an entire separate pop up - the mockup that ΛI DRIVR showed would be the absolute best way to handle this. You can observe all of your disengagements at the end of your drive and then you can go through and take the time to tag it all properly. As it is now I would guess 75% of people are just going to hit an option at random to dismiss the popup. Tesla AI Ashok Elluswamy

Devin Olsen

11,310 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A clip from the latest episode of The Antony Loewenstein Podcast, this week in collaboration with the We Used To Be Journos Podcast, talking the Bondi attack, its gross politicisation and the desperate need for critical Jewish voices. You can listen on Spotify, Apple and Youtube:
1:16

A clip from the latest episode of The Antony Loewenstein Podcast, this week in collaboration with the We Used To Be Journos Podcast, talking the Bondi attack, its gross politicisation and the desperate need for critical Jewish voices. You can listen on Spotify, Apple and Youtube:

Antony Loewenstein

43,502 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The same kinds of productivity gains we've seen in coding with AI agents are heading to the rest of knowledge work. This is the jump when you go from having a chatbot to being able to actually have an agent go off and do work for minutes or even hours and come back with a complete work output that you then review. Here's an example of the new Box Agent filling out an RFP response from an existing knowledge base. This process would normally take hours to fill out, and requires the full attention of the user doing the work. Now, you provide the Box Agent with the RFP questions, and it will go off, make a plan, extract all the relevant questions, read through existing source material to come up with an answer, and then generate a new word document as the final output. All while you're doing something else. The key to this architecture is that the agent is able to use all of the same tools in the background that a user uses to get work done. The agent can search for documents, read entire files, run scripts and tools in the background, and even be able to write code on the fly to automate tasks it hasn't seen before. And best of all, the Box Agent will (soon) work from the Box MCP and CLI so you can invoke it in any agentic system as a step in a process. This kind of agent complexity would have been impossible even 6 months ago. Models consistently failed at tracking long running tasks or using the right tools at the right moment for the task. But this is all now possible because of models like GPT-5.4, Opus 4.6, and Gemini 3, and is only getting better by the month. Just as we moved from engineers writing code and using AI as an assistant to answer questions, in many areas of knowledge work -like legal, finance, consulting, sales, marketing, and more- when we have a problem we'll just kick off the AI agent to just go work on it for us in the background.
2:14

The same kinds of productivity gains we've seen in coding with AI agents are heading to the rest of knowledge work. This is the jump when you go from having a chatbot to being able to actually have an agent go off and do work for minutes or even hours and come back with a complete work output that you then review. Here's an example of the new Box Agent filling out an RFP response from an existing knowledge base. This process would normally take hours to fill out, and requires the full attention of the user doing the work. Now, you provide the Box Agent with the RFP questions, and it will go off, make a plan, extract all the relevant questions, read through existing source material to come up with an answer, and then generate a new word document as the final output. All while you're doing something else. The key to this architecture is that the agent is able to use all of the same tools in the background that a user uses to get work done. The agent can search for documents, read entire files, run scripts and tools in the background, and even be able to write code on the fly to automate tasks it hasn't seen before. And best of all, the Box Agent will (soon) work from the Box MCP and CLI so you can invoke it in any agentic system as a step in a process. This kind of agent complexity would have been impossible even 6 months ago. Models consistently failed at tracking long running tasks or using the right tools at the right moment for the task. But this is all now possible because of models like GPT-5.4, Opus 4.6, and Gemini 3, and is only getting better by the month. Just as we moved from engineers writing code and using AI as an assistant to answer questions, in many areas of knowledge work -like legal, finance, consulting, sales, marketing, and more- when we have a problem we'll just kick off the AI agent to just go work on it for us in the background.

Aaron Levie

24,728 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Scott on why conviction in an idea is dangerous as an investor but required as a founder: "From the investor seat, I don't think you want to be in love with an idea. That's a risky thing because you'll find a way to express that by investing and make some compromises on the team because you know this idea is just so good, its time has come. But if the team isn't there, 90% of the time it doesn't work. Then there's a whole thing can you swap out the team? But the whole Founders Fund thesis was always no, you need the founder to run the company. But on the company side, you have to be in love with the idea. It's not that rational to start a company. There's a lot easier, more comfortable ways to make money if that's the goal. So it's got to be about what the company is doing specifically. If you want to actually start a company, it better be something that you're really passionate about, or you think that the problem is really important."
1:15

Scott on why conviction in an idea is dangerous as an investor but required as a founder: "From the investor seat, I don't think you want to be in love with an idea. That's a risky thing because you'll find a way to express that by investing and make some compromises on the team because you know this idea is just so good, its time has come. But if the team isn't there, 90% of the time it doesn't work. Then there's a whole thing can you swap out the team? But the whole Founders Fund thesis was always no, you need the founder to run the company. But on the company side, you have to be in love with the idea. It's not that rational to start a company. There's a lot easier, more comfortable ways to make money if that's the goal. So it's got to be about what the company is doing specifically. If you want to actually start a company, it better be something that you're really passionate about, or you think that the problem is really important."

Patrick OShaughnessy

33,016 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This post has over 38k likes, “There has to be more to life than this” “Does anybody else find it insane that the majority of us spend our days at a job that we don't particularly want to be at just to collect a paycheck big enough to pay our bills and pay our taxes and whatever else we need to literally survive? And then you come home in the evening and you only have a couple hours to yourself before you have to go to bed and then do it all over again. And you arrive to the weekend and it's beautiful because you don't have to go into work, but it's over in a blimp and then you're right back onto the same cycle. There has to be more to life than this — There has to be more to life than this. Does anybody else feel this way?”
0:41

This post has over 38k likes, “There has to be more to life than this” “Does anybody else find it insane that the majority of us spend our days at a job that we don't particularly want to be at just to collect a paycheck big enough to pay our bills and pay our taxes and whatever else we need to literally survive? And then you come home in the evening and you only have a couple hours to yourself before you have to go to bed and then do it all over again. And you arrive to the weekend and it's beautiful because you don't have to go into work, but it's over in a blimp and then you're right back onto the same cycle. There has to be more to life than this — There has to be more to life than this. Does anybody else feel this way?”

Wall Street Apes

1,536,797 просмотров • 1 год назад