Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Leaked terms of a potential nuclear breakthrough are raising serious eyebrows among global military observers. While foreign media claims Iran has allegedly agreed to transfer its highly enriched uranium and permanently freeze its nuclear weapons ambitions, military analyst Pravin Sawhney remains highly skeptical of these reports. Pravin notes...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,593,948 subscribers

32,523 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨🇮🇷 Rumors are swirling within international intelligence circles that Iran has successfully developed its first functional nuclear warhead over the past year. Noted defense analyst Pravin Sawhney believes that Tehran absolutely possesses the fast-tracked technical capability to assemble a device and will strictly refuse to give up its enriched uranium. However, Sawhney emphasizes that the state will allegedly keep its nuclear status completely secret, relying instead on its massive conventional proxy network to dominate the battlespace. Pravin Sawhney
10:24

🚨🇮🇷 Rumors are swirling within international intelligence circles that Iran has successfully developed its first functional nuclear warhead over the past year. Noted defense analyst Pravin Sawhney believes that Tehran absolutely possesses the fast-tracked technical capability to assemble a device and will strictly refuse to give up its enriched uranium. However, Sawhney emphasizes that the state will allegedly keep its nuclear status completely secret, relying instead on its massive conventional proxy network to dominate the battlespace. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

88,537 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The foundational structures of American military dominance across the Eurasian landmass are starting to fracture. Defense analyst Pravin Sawhney points out that host nations lose genuine sovereignty the moment they become completely dependent on foreign military outposts for protection. If Washington is ultimately forced to pack up its regional bases, Pravin warns it will trigger a massive geopolitical vacuum. He believes this shift will leave the heart of global trade and critical minerals completely dominated by a rising China-Russia-Iran alliance. Pravin Sawhney
4:39

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The foundational structures of American military dominance across the Eurasian landmass are starting to fracture. Defense analyst Pravin Sawhney points out that host nations lose genuine sovereignty the moment they become completely dependent on foreign military outposts for protection. If Washington is ultimately forced to pack up its regional bases, Pravin warns it will trigger a massive geopolitical vacuum. He believes this shift will leave the heart of global trade and critical minerals completely dominated by a rising China-Russia-Iran alliance. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

47,898 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The Western narrative surrounding a breakthrough Middle East peace agreement is drastically disconnected from reality. Defense analyst Pravin Sawhney argues that the proposed Islamabad Agreement still hinges entirely on Tehran's senior leadership approving the terms, meaning a definitive deal is far from finalized. Backed by Beijing and Moscow, Iran is leveraging its battlefield wins to establish a completely new post-war regional framework. Pravin suggested that the ultimate goal here is forcing an absolute withdrawal of foreign military presence from the region. Pravin Sawhney
3:30

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The Western narrative surrounding a breakthrough Middle East peace agreement is drastically disconnected from reality. Defense analyst Pravin Sawhney argues that the proposed Islamabad Agreement still hinges entirely on Tehran's senior leadership approving the terms, meaning a definitive deal is far from finalized. Backed by Beijing and Moscow, Iran is leveraging its battlefield wins to establish a completely new post-war regional framework. Pravin suggested that the ultimate goal here is forcing an absolute withdrawal of foreign military presence from the region. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

39,599 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's public threats and sanctions may have already killed any chance of a deal. Defense analyst Pravin Sawhney breaks down why Iran has ZERO incentive to hand over control of the Strait of Hormuz, and why the way this is being handled makes it worse. "Making these public announcements and then going TACO after that is why nobody is taking him seriously at all." The window for negotiation is cracked open, but just barely… Pravin Sawhney
2:27

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's public threats and sanctions may have already killed any chance of a deal. Defense analyst Pravin Sawhney breaks down why Iran has ZERO incentive to hand over control of the Strait of Hormuz, and why the way this is being handled makes it worse. "Making these public announcements and then going TACO after that is why nobody is taking him seriously at all." The window for negotiation is cracked open, but just barely… Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

63,383 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Washington is facing a profound credibility crisis in West Asia as regional defiance reaches an all-time high. Prominent defense analyst Pravin Sawhney bluntly states that Prime Minister Netanyahu is allegedly exploiting weak U.S. leadership to run America's policy in the region for his own political survival. According to Sawhney, these unconstrained tactical escalations are completely backfiring, only serving to make Tehran and its regional allies more resilient and determined. Pravin Sawhney
7:08

🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Washington is facing a profound credibility crisis in West Asia as regional defiance reaches an all-time high. Prominent defense analyst Pravin Sawhney bluntly states that Prime Minister Netanyahu is allegedly exploiting weak U.S. leadership to run America's policy in the region for his own political survival. According to Sawhney, these unconstrained tactical escalations are completely backfiring, only serving to make Tehran and its regional allies more resilient and determined. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

55,274 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇮🇱🇱🇧🇺🇸 High-stakes reports reveal that a furious, expletive-laced phone call between Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu briefly halted an imminent Israeli bombing campaign on Beirut. Respected defense analyst Pravin Sawhney notes that while Washington is desperately trying to push for an overall deal, Tehran has frozen all memorandum of understanding negotiations until a comprehensive ceasefire across all military fronts is reached. According to Sawhney, the region's geopolitical landscape is rapidly shifting as a resilient Iran operates from a clear position of strength. Pravin Sawhney
7:56

🚨🇮🇱🇱🇧🇺🇸 High-stakes reports reveal that a furious, expletive-laced phone call between Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu briefly halted an imminent Israeli bombing campaign on Beirut. Respected defense analyst Pravin Sawhney notes that while Washington is desperately trying to push for an overall deal, Tehran has frozen all memorandum of understanding negotiations until a comprehensive ceasefire across all military fronts is reached. According to Sawhney, the region's geopolitical landscape is rapidly shifting as a resilient Iran operates from a clear position of strength. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

37,138 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷🇺🇸 The Middle East is locked in a volatile "no war, no peace" cycle after a rapid sequence of direct missile exchanges between Israel and Iran. Former Indian Army officer Pravin Sawhney argues that despite public assertions of zero U.S. involvement, Israel cannot execute these deep-theater offensive strikes without relying on critical American space and Centcom capabilities. Ultimately, Sawhney believes the ball rests entirely in the White House's court to decisively cut off this military assistance or watch the region continue to spiral. Pravin Sawhney
10:07

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷🇺🇸 The Middle East is locked in a volatile "no war, no peace" cycle after a rapid sequence of direct missile exchanges between Israel and Iran. Former Indian Army officer Pravin Sawhney argues that despite public assertions of zero U.S. involvement, Israel cannot execute these deep-theater offensive strikes without relying on critical American space and Centcom capabilities. Ultimately, Sawhney believes the ball rests entirely in the White House's court to decisively cut off this military assistance or watch the region continue to spiral. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

62,021 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸🇸🇦 The historic 1974 security landscape of the Gulf has expired, and Washington isn't coming to save the day anymore. Defence expert Pravin Sawhney suggested that GCC countries are lagging behind in reviewing their security, failing to realize that Pakistan is now far better equipped to protect them than the U.S. military. As a professional nuclear power deeply integrated into the Muslim world and backed by Beijing's massive shadow, Islamabad may offer a much more reliable shield than a hollowed-out Western presence. Pravin Sawhney
10:07

🚨🇺🇸🇸🇦 The historic 1974 security landscape of the Gulf has expired, and Washington isn't coming to save the day anymore. Defence expert Pravin Sawhney suggested that GCC countries are lagging behind in reviewing their security, failing to realize that Pakistan is now far better equipped to protect them than the U.S. military. As a professional nuclear power deeply integrated into the Muslim world and backed by Beijing's massive shadow, Islamabad may offer a much more reliable shield than a hollowed-out Western presence. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

35,708 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump may be running out of military options Washington’s central objective is still restoring Hormuz to its pre-war status. Pravin's problem: Iran has no intention of allowing it. “Honestly, the only option is that he has no option.” Sawhney believes Trump cannot simply abandon the blockade without conceding the new reality Tehran is trying to impose, while further escalation risks an Iranian response Washington may struggle to contain. That leaves the U.S. in an ugly position. Too invested to leave. Too constrained to win on its original terms. Pravin Sawhney
4:48

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump may be running out of military options Washington’s central objective is still restoring Hormuz to its pre-war status. Pravin's problem: Iran has no intention of allowing it. “Honestly, the only option is that he has no option.” Sawhney believes Trump cannot simply abandon the blockade without conceding the new reality Tehran is trying to impose, while further escalation risks an Iranian response Washington may struggle to contain. That leaves the U.S. in an ugly position. Too invested to leave. Too constrained to win on its original terms. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

47,459 просмотров • 27 дней назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 I asked defence and strategic affairs analyst Pravin Sawhney whether U.S strikes on the Houthis are still on the table after Trump reportedly pulled back at the last minute. His answer went somewhere MUCH bigger. He believes Trump is looking for a way out of the wider confrontation, and that his relationship with Xi Jinping could make another major escalation even less attractive. But if Washington eventually reaches an understanding with Tehran, Pravin believes there is one condition Iran simply will not surrender: The IRGC controls security in the Strait of Hormuz. He also expects Iran to demand that the waterway is managed jointly with Oman, and that Tehran receives some form of fee. That would represent a remarkable outcome after months of war, sanctions and attempts to break Iran’s grip over the Strait. The question may no longer be whether Iran gives up control of Hormuz. It may be what Washington is ultimately prepared to accept in order to get it open. Pravin Sawhney
4:45

🇺🇸🇮🇷 I asked defence and strategic affairs analyst Pravin Sawhney whether U.S strikes on the Houthis are still on the table after Trump reportedly pulled back at the last minute. His answer went somewhere MUCH bigger. He believes Trump is looking for a way out of the wider confrontation, and that his relationship with Xi Jinping could make another major escalation even less attractive. But if Washington eventually reaches an understanding with Tehran, Pravin believes there is one condition Iran simply will not surrender: The IRGC controls security in the Strait of Hormuz. He also expects Iran to demand that the waterway is managed jointly with Oman, and that Tehran receives some form of fee. That would represent a remarkable outcome after months of war, sanctions and attempts to break Iran’s grip over the Strait. The question may no longer be whether Iran gives up control of Hormuz. It may be what Washington is ultimately prepared to accept in order to get it open. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

34,988 просмотров • 12 дней назад

🇮🇷 Iran may have more to lose from building a nuclear bomb than from not building one. After months of war, attacks on Iranian territory and growing calls inside Iran for a nuclear deterrent, the obvious assumption is that Tehran is now closer to building the bomb. Pravin Sawhney argues the opposite. “𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘯 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘴.” Iran doesn't lack the capability. In his view, Tehran no longer needs one. Sawhney argues Iran has demonstrated enough conventional missile capability to deter further escalation while simultaneously building something potentially more valuable: a regional security architecture with Gulf states and backing from Russia and China. A nuclear weapon could blow that apart. “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘱𝘰𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘔𝘦𝘤𝘤𝘢 𝘑𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘋𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 𝘈𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘱𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴.” Instead of being viewed as a partner against outside intervention, Iran could suddenly look like the regional hegemon its neighbors need protection from. That leads Sawhney to a very different reading of Tehran’s strategy. Iran’s ultimate deterrent may not be a bomb. It may be making the American military presence in the region increasingly unnecessary. Pravin Sawhney
41:45

🇮🇷 Iran may have more to lose from building a nuclear bomb than from not building one. After months of war, attacks on Iranian territory and growing calls inside Iran for a nuclear deterrent, the obvious assumption is that Tehran is now closer to building the bomb. Pravin Sawhney argues the opposite. “𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘯 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘴.” Iran doesn't lack the capability. In his view, Tehran no longer needs one. Sawhney argues Iran has demonstrated enough conventional missile capability to deter further escalation while simultaneously building something potentially more valuable: a regional security architecture with Gulf states and backing from Russia and China. A nuclear weapon could blow that apart. “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘱𝘰𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘔𝘦𝘤𝘤𝘢 𝘑𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘋𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 𝘈𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘱𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴.” Instead of being viewed as a partner against outside intervention, Iran could suddenly look like the regional hegemon its neighbors need protection from. That leads Sawhney to a very different reading of Tehran’s strategy. Iran’s ultimate deterrent may not be a bomb. It may be making the American military presence in the region increasingly unnecessary. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

253,718 просмотров • 12 дней назад

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN COULD BUILD A NUCLEAR BOMB IN DAYS Scott Ritter says Iran has been preparing for this war since 2005, restructuring its military and stockpiling capabilities for more than two decades. He argues current strikes are not crippling Tehran’s core capabilities and insists Iran anticipated U.S. and Israeli tactics long ago. He also warns the real danger is nuclear escalation, claiming Iran can enrich its 60% uranium to weapons grade “in a matter of days” if leadership chooses that path. Scott Ritter
11:46

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN COULD BUILD A NUCLEAR BOMB IN DAYS Scott Ritter says Iran has been preparing for this war since 2005, restructuring its military and stockpiling capabilities for more than two decades. He argues current strikes are not crippling Tehran’s core capabilities and insists Iran anticipated U.S. and Israeli tactics long ago. He also warns the real danger is nuclear escalation, claiming Iran can enrich its 60% uranium to weapons grade “in a matter of days” if leadership chooses that path. Scott Ritter

Mario Nawfal

108,143 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Trump signed the MOU himself; nobody twisted his arm, and now there's no version of this where he walks away clean. Defense analyst Pravin Sawhney lays out why this stopped being Israel's war the moment America joined the strikes on Feb 28, and Iran shut the Strait 48 hours later. His read is that U.S. munitions reserves are running thin. Although the rate of use is nowhere near the first campaigns tempo, there’s no fast refill coming. Iran swapped missile guidance from GPS to China's BeiDou-3 in January. It gives their missiles much better accuracy, they’re hypersonic and highly maneuverable, fired from underground sites spread across the country. And the Gulf's soft spot is water. Kuwait is 90% desalination-dependent, and Saudi is 70%. Iran already proved it can reach them. "The petrodollar is at the heart of the American empire" If Trump walks away and he risks the dollar's grip on global energy slipping. Stay and he bleeds a military that can't hold the tempo, in a region where Iran can eat damage that its neighbours can't. Is Trump choosing between winning and losing, or just picking which way to lose? Pravin Sawhney
42:09

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Trump signed the MOU himself; nobody twisted his arm, and now there's no version of this where he walks away clean. Defense analyst Pravin Sawhney lays out why this stopped being Israel's war the moment America joined the strikes on Feb 28, and Iran shut the Strait 48 hours later. His read is that U.S. munitions reserves are running thin. Although the rate of use is nowhere near the first campaigns tempo, there’s no fast refill coming. Iran swapped missile guidance from GPS to China's BeiDou-3 in January. It gives their missiles much better accuracy, they’re hypersonic and highly maneuverable, fired from underground sites spread across the country. And the Gulf's soft spot is water. Kuwait is 90% desalination-dependent, and Saudi is 70%. Iran already proved it can reach them. "The petrodollar is at the heart of the American empire" If Trump walks away and he risks the dollar's grip on global energy slipping. Stay and he bleeds a military that can't hold the tempo, in a region where Iran can eat damage that its neighbours can't. Is Trump choosing between winning and losing, or just picking which way to lose? Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

330,095 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 IRAN’S URANIUM STOCKPILE MAY NOW BE HIDDEN INSIDE “PICKAXE MOUNTAIN” U.S. intelligence sources believe Iran has moved its remaining enriched uranium stockpile to a heavily fortified underground complex known as “Pickaxe Mountain.” The site is believed to be deeply buried inside a mountain near Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, with tunnels reinforced to withstand even the most powerful conventional bunker-buster weapons. If the reports are accurate, it would mean Tehran has placed its most sensitive nuclear material inside one of the hardest targets on Earth to destroy. Satellite imagery over recent years has shown massive tunnel entrances, expanding underground chambers, and heavy security, suggesting the site was designed specifically to protect critical nuclear assets. For military planners, the implications are serious. Facilities like this are built for one purpose: to survive a strike and preserve a nuclear program even if everything above ground is destroyed. If Iran’s uranium has indeed been moved there, the strategic equation around its nuclear capability may have just changed dramatically.
0:28

🚨 IRAN’S URANIUM STOCKPILE MAY NOW BE HIDDEN INSIDE “PICKAXE MOUNTAIN” U.S. intelligence sources believe Iran has moved its remaining enriched uranium stockpile to a heavily fortified underground complex known as “Pickaxe Mountain.” The site is believed to be deeply buried inside a mountain near Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, with tunnels reinforced to withstand even the most powerful conventional bunker-buster weapons. If the reports are accurate, it would mean Tehran has placed its most sensitive nuclear material inside one of the hardest targets on Earth to destroy. Satellite imagery over recent years has shown massive tunnel entrances, expanding underground chambers, and heavy security, suggesting the site was designed specifically to protect critical nuclear assets. For military planners, the implications are serious. Facilities like this are built for one purpose: to survive a strike and preserve a nuclear program even if everything above ground is destroyed. If Iran’s uranium has indeed been moved there, the strategic equation around its nuclear capability may have just changed dramatically.

Jim Ferguson

67,489 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S.–Iran deal is on the brink of collapse. Why could the world miss out on a new nuclear agreement? Here are the top 5 reasons 1️⃣ Conflicting signals on talks. Washington says a new round of negotiations is set for Doha. Tehran insists: "No talks with the U.S. are scheduled in the coming days." 2️⃣ The Strait of Hormuz remains a flashpoint. The U.S. demands unrestricted freedom of navigation, while Iran insists it has the right to control the strategic waterway. 3️⃣ No breakthrough on sanctions or the nuclear program. The fate of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium and the lifting of sanctions remain the biggest sticking points. 4️⃣ One spark could reignite the conflict. A recent exchange of attacks near the Strait of Hormuz—including an attack on a tanker and a U.S. response—has already triggered a new wave of mutual threats. 5️⃣ The Lebanon front is complicating everything. Iran demands a full Israeli withdrawal, while Israel insists Hezbollah must first be disarmed. As long as fighting continues, diplomacy remains deadlocked. Meanwhile, Polymarket traders now give just a 46% chance that a final U.S.–Iran nuclear deal will be reached before the end of 2026📊 Would you bet on a deal—or another escalation?
0:57

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S.–Iran deal is on the brink of collapse. Why could the world miss out on a new nuclear agreement? Here are the top 5 reasons 1️⃣ Conflicting signals on talks. Washington says a new round of negotiations is set for Doha. Tehran insists: "No talks with the U.S. are scheduled in the coming days." 2️⃣ The Strait of Hormuz remains a flashpoint. The U.S. demands unrestricted freedom of navigation, while Iran insists it has the right to control the strategic waterway. 3️⃣ No breakthrough on sanctions or the nuclear program. The fate of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium and the lifting of sanctions remain the biggest sticking points. 4️⃣ One spark could reignite the conflict. A recent exchange of attacks near the Strait of Hormuz—including an attack on a tanker and a U.S. response—has already triggered a new wave of mutual threats. 5️⃣ The Lebanon front is complicating everything. Iran demands a full Israeli withdrawal, while Israel insists Hezbollah must first be disarmed. As long as fighting continues, diplomacy remains deadlocked. Meanwhile, Polymarket traders now give just a 46% chance that a final U.S.–Iran nuclear deal will be reached before the end of 2026📊 Would you bet on a deal—or another escalation?

NEXTA

30,396 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 NO TURNING BACK: THE NUCLEAR RACE AND THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ The U.S. and its allies are now facing a "bad vs. worse" scenario where stopping the current conflict could trigger a sprint toward a nuclear device. With 460kg of highly enriched uranium already in play, the regime has left the West with zero risk-free options. Despite claims that the Strait of Hormuz is closed, Aimen Dean points out that Iran is actually exporting more oil than ever while fighting with an "Iraq-Iran war" mentality from the 1980s. The transition to AI and underwater drone technology has changed the game, but the escalation toward a "catalyst for collapse" remains fraught with danger. Aimen Dean
5:28

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 NO TURNING BACK: THE NUCLEAR RACE AND THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ The U.S. and its allies are now facing a "bad vs. worse" scenario where stopping the current conflict could trigger a sprint toward a nuclear device. With 460kg of highly enriched uranium already in play, the regime has left the West with zero risk-free options. Despite claims that the Strait of Hormuz is closed, Aimen Dean points out that Iran is actually exporting more oil than ever while fighting with an "Iraq-Iran war" mentality from the 1980s. The transition to AI and underwater drone technology has changed the game, but the escalation toward a "catalyst for collapse" remains fraught with danger. Aimen Dean

Mario Nawfal

101,215 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi
1:48

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi

Mario Nawfal

85,274 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran's decided to wait Trump out, and the Middle East is already reorganizing itself on that assumption. Pravin Sawhney, editor of FORCE magazine and one of the sharpest strategic minds covering this conflict, joins me with an assessment that reframes it all: This war ended on April 8th, the day the U.S. air campaign concluded, having failed to achieve air dominance over Iran. Everything since has been posturing, and Iran knows it. Iran's strategy is now explicit: wait until 2029, get a deal with the next president, and hold Hormuz as leverage as the global economy bleeds... The agreement signed in Mecca is not a NATO-style military alliance, it is a collective security framework designed to replace American security architecture in the region before America even officially leaves. Qatar is signaling it may join, Iran has publicly welcomed it, and Sawhney believes Iran ITSELF could eventually become a part of this framework... U.S. strategic petroleum reserves are at 1983 levels with roughly 43 days of supply remaining. Interceptor stocks across THAAD, Patriots, SM-3 and SM-6 are critically low. Trump's threats to strike Iranian energy facilities are, in Sawhney's words, "complete nonsense." The region isn't waiting around for Washington to decide what comes next... it already has. Thanks for the conversation, Pravin Sawhney
45:09

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran's decided to wait Trump out, and the Middle East is already reorganizing itself on that assumption. Pravin Sawhney, editor of FORCE magazine and one of the sharpest strategic minds covering this conflict, joins me with an assessment that reframes it all: This war ended on April 8th, the day the U.S. air campaign concluded, having failed to achieve air dominance over Iran. Everything since has been posturing, and Iran knows it. Iran's strategy is now explicit: wait until 2029, get a deal with the next president, and hold Hormuz as leverage as the global economy bleeds... The agreement signed in Mecca is not a NATO-style military alliance, it is a collective security framework designed to replace American security architecture in the region before America even officially leaves. Qatar is signaling it may join, Iran has publicly welcomed it, and Sawhney believes Iran ITSELF could eventually become a part of this framework... U.S. strategic petroleum reserves are at 1983 levels with roughly 43 days of supply remaining. Interceptor stocks across THAAD, Patriots, SM-3 and SM-6 are critically low. Trump's threats to strike Iranian energy facilities are, in Sawhney's words, "complete nonsense." The region isn't waiting around for Washington to decide what comes next... it already has. Thanks for the conversation, Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

308,296 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump was HOURS away from striking Iran's energy infrastructure, but a deal may have just pulled the world back from the edge. Pravin Sawhney, one of India's most respected defense analysts, joined me to make sense of what actually happened overnight: Trump's "locked and loaded" post came hours after Qatar brokered a compromise on Hormuz, with vessels entering via Iranian territorial waters and exiting via Omani waters. An arrangement that gives Iran effective control of inbound traffic without completely shutting the strait. Iran denied the reports, as Sawhney expected: "The Iranians always deny good news until it is signed, they don't want to calm the markets, they want to keep the pressure on Trump." But beyond any deal, the U.S. simply does not have the military wherewithal, destroyers needed for Israel's integrated air defense are already stretched thin, and missiles and interceptors are sorely depleted. So what does Iran actually want from all this? Not just Hormuz fees, but American forces OUT of the Middle East entirely, which is what Article 4 of the MOU already stipulates, within 30 days of a final deal. "Trump should stop issuing public threats and get into serious closed-door negotiations, that is the only way a solution gets found." A deal is closer than yesterday, but still further than anyone would like... Thanks for coming on again, Pravin Sawhney
50:45

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump was HOURS away from striking Iran's energy infrastructure, but a deal may have just pulled the world back from the edge. Pravin Sawhney, one of India's most respected defense analysts, joined me to make sense of what actually happened overnight: Trump's "locked and loaded" post came hours after Qatar brokered a compromise on Hormuz, with vessels entering via Iranian territorial waters and exiting via Omani waters. An arrangement that gives Iran effective control of inbound traffic without completely shutting the strait. Iran denied the reports, as Sawhney expected: "The Iranians always deny good news until it is signed, they don't want to calm the markets, they want to keep the pressure on Trump." But beyond any deal, the U.S. simply does not have the military wherewithal, destroyers needed for Israel's integrated air defense are already stretched thin, and missiles and interceptors are sorely depleted. So what does Iran actually want from all this? Not just Hormuz fees, but American forces OUT of the Middle East entirely, which is what Article 4 of the MOU already stipulates, within 30 days of a final deal. "Trump should stop issuing public threats and get into serious closed-door negotiations, that is the only way a solution gets found." A deal is closer than yesterday, but still further than anyone would like... Thanks for coming on again, Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

337,824 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад