正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Learn about Harnesses! I went over all these - omp - pi - claude code - zcode - codex - warp This is what I am using everyday, I explain the difference and benefits of each.

92,814 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

32 条评论

0xSero 的头像
0xSero1 个月前

On Youtube also

Swonk 的头像
Swonk1 个月前

Pi isn't comparable to others imo wins by a large margin

✦ Justin Brock ✦ 的头像
✦ Justin Brock ✦1 个月前

Add Hermes!

Pierre L 的头像
Pierre L1 个月前

No more droid ?

Ø¥ĀMÄ 的头像
Ø¥ĀMÄ1 个月前

No hermes harness?

Coconut 的头像
Coconut1 个月前

No Hermes?

Kareem 的头像
Kareem1 个月前

Try by @1jehuang

Maaz 的头像
Maaz1 个月前

bro this is exactly why i don’t think there’ll be one “best” harness 😭 you end up using codex for one thing, claude code for another, omp/pi for something else… and then somehow you have 8 agents running across 5 terminals. we’re basically building @aoagents for that mess. use whatever harness you want, AO just gives you one place to run and keep track of all of them.

Shawn McAllister 的头像
Shawn McAllister1 个月前

jcode is another rust option

Artem 的头像
Artem1 个月前

Six harnesses. Still one question. What can the chosen one touch without asking.

AI Mastery Guide 的头像
AI Mastery Guide1 个月前

Which harness wins for you?

Daniel Carneiro 的头像
Daniel Carneiro1 个月前

Have you used @opencrabs ?

maddada • ghostex.dev 的头像
maddada • ghostex.dev1 个月前

You have to give Ghostex a try again my friend, been working very hard on it and it's really good now. Recently added Agent CLI "Chat Views" and an Extensions system. Also made the app much lighter and faster (It's now GPUI & Rust based instead of swift/appkit). Android & iOS apps rebuilt from scratch too. Please let me know what you think!

AbraTabia 的头像
AbraTabia1 个月前

The thing that surprised me most moving between harnesses is how much of the quality gap is the system prompt and the tool descriptions, not the model. Same model, two harnesses, very different tool call accuracy. Which one has felt most steerable to you?

Bokiko 的头像
Bokiko1 个月前

Hey @grok tldr this video plz

riVeN 的头像
riVeN1 个月前

The only harness difference that survives a month is how it handles context compaction and what it can touch unasked.

Dan Repaci 的头像
Dan Repaci1 个月前

Decompile codex app lol

otter 的头像
otter1 个月前

I'm trying out Codegraff and JCode

🇯🇵 human touched 🇯🇵 的头像
🇯🇵 human touched 🇯🇵1 个月前

timely, thank you! 🙏🏽🤗 (cc-ing @itsbeaudean too)

Vijay 的头像
Vijay1 个月前

Add amp and devin too

Asogan Moodaly 的头像
Asogan Moodaly1 个月前

Hermes?

Aqua's Chaos Belle 的头像
Aqua's Chaos Belle1 个月前

You look older than I expected

Swival.dev 的头像
Swival.dev1 个月前

Swival?

Fraser Price 的头像
Fraser Price1 个月前

Hi which of these are written in bash

Marcelo Retana 的头像
Marcelo Retana1 个月前

One can use Claude Code models on other harnesses with a subscription or only via api?

Caleb 的头像
Caleb1 个月前

Keep the great content coming OxSero!

GWΞI LO 🐸 的头像
GWΞI LO 🐸1 个月前

it often shocks me how disgustingly unproductive omp vibe mode can be with the wrong model

framp 的头像
framp1 个月前

This is great! Btw you can have subagents (and goals) with pi extensions

Shikhar 的头像
Shikhar1 个月前

Nice I need to watch

Andreas Parusel 的头像
Andreas Parusel1 个月前

This was really interesting. Thanks for sharing your workflows!

Sophia Data Queen 的头像
Sophia Data Queen1 个月前

The model list is noisy. The harness list is the actual stack.

Nokia04 的头像
Nokia041 个月前

harness diffs matter more than model diffs lately.

相关视频