Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Learning robust, general-purpose reward functions for robotics unlocks many potential applications, like on-robot reinforcement learning or dataset validation. However, there’s a question of how to actually train such reward functions. Training success/failure prediction leads to ambiguous signals partway through a demonstration — it’s hard to measure progress — making... the method unsuitable for reinforcement learning, among other things. Predicting progress, on the other hand, does not give a good way of using failure data. So why not do both? Robometer combines both progress and preference supervision, resulting in a stable, scalable, and highly general reward learning approach. Anthony Liang Yigit Korkmaz and Jesse Zhang join us to tell us more. Watch Episode #84 of RoboPapers, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan today!show more

RoboPapers

6,498 subscribers

14,751 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Reinforcement on robots is highly limited by our ability to design good reward functions; this means that designing strong, generalizable reward functions is a key enabler to progress on real-world reinforcement learning. But we already have a very general class of models: VLMs. Wouldn’t it be great if you could just use a VLM to generate rewards, then? TOPReward directly generates rewards from the probability of the “True” token of a VLM question-answering response; this makes it easy to implement, incredibly general, and surprisingly powerful. We talked to Shirui and Cole Harrison to learn more. Watch Episode#75 of RoboPapers now to learn more, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan!

Reinforcement on robots is highly limited by our ability to design good reward functions; this means that designing strong, generalizable reward functions is a key enabler to progress on real-world reinforcement learning. But we already have a very general class of models: VLMs. Wouldn’t it be great if you could just use a VLM to generate rewards, then? TOPReward directly generates rewards from the probability of the “True” token of a VLM question-answering response; this makes it easy to implement, incredibly general, and surprisingly powerful. We talked to Shirui and Cole Harrison to learn more. Watch Episode#75 of RoboPapers now to learn more, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan!

RoboPapers

13,185 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Robot policies must be both reliable and highly capable to be useful; the best way to achieve this level of performance is with reinforcement learning. However, for reinforcement learning you are usually stuck between two difficult options: reinforcement in the real world is often risky and expensive, while reinforcement learning in a traditional simulator takes a lot of engineering work and has a persistent sim-to-real gap. What if instead you could train your robot purely in a world model? RISE by Jiazhi Yang et al. uses a compositional world model to predict the future and evaluate progress. This allows for a self-improving pipeline, which learns a world model from real data and then learns how the robot should perform different tasks. This pipeline results in a data-driven way to improve policy performance from real data but without real-world reinforcement learning. Watch Episode #86 of RoboPapers, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan, to learn more!

Robot policies must be both reliable and highly capable to be useful; the best way to achieve this level of performance is with reinforcement learning. However, for reinforcement learning you are usually stuck between two difficult options: reinforcement in the real world is often risky and expensive, while reinforcement learning in a traditional simulator takes a lot of engineering work and has a persistent sim-to-real gap. What if instead you could train your robot purely in a world model? RISE by Jiazhi Yang et al. uses a compositional world model to predict the future and evaluate progress. This allows for a self-improving pipeline, which learns a world model from real data and then learns how the robot should perform different tasks. This pipeline results in a data-driven way to improve policy performance from real data but without real-world reinforcement learning. Watch Episode #86 of RoboPapers, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan, to learn more!

RoboPapers

38,867 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Specifying reward functions for robots is one of the hardest things about reinforcement learning. Robot rewards often need to be very detailed; metrics like progress can be ill-defined and hard to estimate. This leads to most robot learning defaulting to sparse rewards or simple preference learning. But naive preference learning (having human annotators choose one trajectory over another) is an easy solution, but obscures a lot of the signal in complex tasks and can make learning a lot less efficient. Marcel Torné, Anubha Mahajan, and Abhijnya Bhat join us to talk about their solution: freeform preference learning, which lets annotators define natural-language axes to compare trajectories over. This improves real-world performance on long-horizon manipulation tasks over sparse rewards and simple binary preference learning. Watch Epsiode 103 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Jiafei Duan✈️CoRL2026, today to learn more!

Specifying reward functions for robots is one of the hardest things about reinforcement learning. Robot rewards often need to be very detailed; metrics like progress can be ill-defined and hard to estimate. This leads to most robot learning defaulting to sparse rewards or simple preference learning. But naive preference learning (having human annotators choose one trajectory over another) is an easy solution, but obscures a lot of the signal in complex tasks and can make learning a lot less efficient. Marcel Torné, Anubha Mahajan, and Abhijnya Bhat join us to talk about their solution: freeform preference learning, which lets annotators define natural-language axes to compare trajectories over. This improves real-world performance on long-horizon manipulation tasks over sparse rewards and simple binary preference learning. Watch Epsiode 103 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Jiafei Duan✈️CoRL2026, today to learn more!

RoboPapers

17,825 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Excitement about world-action models and robot learning has never been higher — they promise a way to use human egocentric data to train massive robotics models which can provide the “GPT” moment for robotics and unlock general-purpose embodied intelligence. And yet there’s been little concrete demonstration of scaling in robot learning. Dyna Robotics aims to change that, with an in-depth look at how scaling works as they approach 1 million hours of training data. Jason Ma Tianyu Li Anh-Quan Pham and Chet Bhateja joined us to tell us more. They show that as the amount of data they use in pretraining increased, they saw predictable, statistically significant gains on accuracy metrics on held-out data (data not seen during training). They go on to talk about what they learned, and show how this can be applied to many different problems. Watch Episode #99 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc Chris Paxton Jiafei Duan today to learn more!

Excitement about world-action models and robot learning has never been higher — they promise a way to use human egocentric data to train massive robotics models which can provide the “GPT” moment for robotics and unlock general-purpose embodied intelligence. And yet there’s been little concrete demonstration of scaling in robot learning. Dyna Robotics aims to change that, with an in-depth look at how scaling works as they approach 1 million hours of training data. Jason Ma Tianyu Li Anh-Quan Pham and Chet Bhateja joined us to tell us more. They show that as the amount of data they use in pretraining increased, they saw predictable, statistically significant gains on accuracy metrics on held-out data (data not seen during training). They go on to talk about what they learned, and show how this can be applied to many different problems. Watch Episode #99 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc Chris Paxton Jiafei Duan today to learn more!

RoboPapers

26,249 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

In order for robots to be deployed in the real world, performing tasks of real value, they must be reliable. Unfortunately, even more, most robotic demos work maybe 70-80% of the time at best. The way to get better reliability is to do real-world reinforcement learning: having the robot teach itself how to perform the task up to a high level of success. The key to doing this is to start with a core of expert human data, use that to train a policy then iteratively improve it, until finally finishing with on-policy reinforcement learning. Kun Lei talks through a unified framework for imitation and reinforcement learning based on PPO, which enables this improvement process. In this episode, Kun Lei explains the theory behind his reinforcement learning method and how it allowed his robot to run in a shopping mall juicing oranges for seven hours at a time, among experiments on a wide variety of tasks and embodiments. Watch episode 58 of RoboPapers now, hosted by Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Chris Paxton!

In order for robots to be deployed in the real world, performing tasks of real value, they must be reliable. Unfortunately, even more, most robotic demos work maybe 70-80% of the time at best. The way to get better reliability is to do real-world reinforcement learning: having the robot teach itself how to perform the task up to a high level of success. The key to doing this is to start with a core of expert human data, use that to train a policy then iteratively improve it, until finally finishing with on-policy reinforcement learning. Kun Lei talks through a unified framework for imitation and reinforcement learning based on PPO, which enables this improvement process. In this episode, Kun Lei explains the theory behind his reinforcement learning method and how it allowed his robot to run in a shopping mall juicing oranges for seven hours at a time, among experiments on a wide variety of tasks and embodiments. Watch episode 58 of RoboPapers now, hosted by Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Chris Paxton!

RoboPapers

18,813 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Sports like tennis are great examples of the sort of dynamic whole-body interaction that’s possible with humanoid robots. But capturing examples of fast, dynamic interactions from humans is really difficult. Enter LATENT, which uses lower-quality human data plus reinforcement learning to teach a robot to play tennis, able to complete back-and-forth volleys at a human level. LATENT has three steps: (1) collecting imperfect human data like a backswing, (2) using these to learn a latent action space, and (3) they train a high-level policy in simulation which can compose these actions and execute tennis skills on a robot. Haofei Lu and Yunrui Lian ✈️ IROS join us to tell us about their method. Watch Episode #80 of RoboPapers, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan, now to learn more!

Sports like tennis are great examples of the sort of dynamic whole-body interaction that’s possible with humanoid robots. But capturing examples of fast, dynamic interactions from humans is really difficult. Enter LATENT, which uses lower-quality human data plus reinforcement learning to teach a robot to play tennis, able to complete back-and-forth volleys at a human level. LATENT has three steps: (1) collecting imperfect human data like a backswing, (2) using these to learn a latent action space, and (3) they train a high-level policy in simulation which can compose these actions and execute tennis skills on a robot. Haofei Lu and Yunrui Lian ✈️ IROS join us to tell us about their method. Watch Episode #80 of RoboPapers, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan, now to learn more!

RoboPapers

30,095 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Achieving human-like dexterity is the next frontier for robotics, and yet dexterity data is often subtly hard to scale. Real-world dexterity data, including things like finger-pose estimates, is often slightly off, making it physically invalid and hard to execute on real hardware and hard to learn from. DO AS I DO is an algorithm for reconstructing and retargeting monocular RGB videos to robot hands, outperforming the state of the art and even working from generated videos. Bhawna Paliwal Haritheja Will Liang and Mahi Shafiullah 🏠🤖 join us to tell us more. Watch Episode 107 of RoboPapers, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan, now!

Achieving human-like dexterity is the next frontier for robotics, and yet dexterity data is often subtly hard to scale. Real-world dexterity data, including things like finger-pose estimates, is often slightly off, making it physically invalid and hard to execute on real hardware and hard to learn from. DO AS I DO is an algorithm for reconstructing and retargeting monocular RGB videos to robot hands, outperforming the state of the art and even working from generated videos. Bhawna Paliwal Haritheja Will Liang and Mahi Shafiullah 🏠🤖 join us to tell us more. Watch Episode 107 of RoboPapers, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan, now!

RoboPapers

30,668 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Human skin plays an important role in how we interact with the world and robustly manipulate objects. It’s not just important when we can’t see things with out eyes, but when we want to pick up something heavy, or apply a very specific amount of force. So, it makes sense to want to give robots skin. Enter DexSkin: a soft, deformable electronic skin which can be applied across different surfaces and used to cover robot hands or fingers. Suzannah Wistreich and Baiyu Shi talk to us about their work building DexSkin, showing how it’s useful for policy learning, including online reinforcement learning, and how it' can be calibrated and policies transferred across sensors. They also open sourced their code and methods for building the sensors. To learn more, watch Episode #88 of RoboPapers now, hosted by Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan!

Human skin plays an important role in how we interact with the world and robustly manipulate objects. It’s not just important when we can’t see things with out eyes, but when we want to pick up something heavy, or apply a very specific amount of force. So, it makes sense to want to give robots skin. Enter DexSkin: a soft, deformable electronic skin which can be applied across different surfaces and used to cover robot hands or fingers. Suzannah Wistreich and Baiyu Shi talk to us about their work building DexSkin, showing how it’s useful for policy learning, including online reinforcement learning, and how it' can be calibrated and policies transferred across sensors. They also open sourced their code and methods for building the sensors. To learn more, watch Episode #88 of RoboPapers now, hosted by Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan!

RoboPapers

21,053 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Pretraining is essential for good performance on a wide variety of robotics tasks, and so most vision-language-action models build off of a vision language model (VLM) trained on a wide variety of image-language data. But how does the choice of VLM translate to downstream robotics performance? Jianke Zhang and @GYanjiang join us to talk about this key part of the robot policy, looking at a wide variety of different VLMs and how they perform. Interestingly, they see that performance on auxiliary tasks like quesiton answering did not lead to downstream improvements in control. To learn more, watch episode 65 of RoboPapers now, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan!

Pretraining is essential for good performance on a wide variety of robotics tasks, and so most vision-language-action models build off of a vision language model (VLM) trained on a wide variety of image-language data. But how does the choice of VLM translate to downstream robotics performance? Jianke Zhang and @GYanjiang join us to talk about this key part of the robot policy, looking at a wide variety of different VLMs and how they perform. Interestingly, they see that performance on auxiliary tasks like quesiton answering did not lead to downstream improvements in control. To learn more, watch episode 65 of RoboPapers now, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan!

RoboPapers

23,905 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Collecting robot data at scale is key to deploying working manipulation policies, and the team from Tutor Intelligence Tutor is here to tell us about how to accomplish it. Their new announcement: a massive, 100-robot “data factory,” with a behind-the-scenes look at how to build a teleoperation platform and how to make robots and policies that are useful for their customers. Tutor Intelligence is a full-stack robotics company: they build robot arms, they sell robot arms, they write the software and they train neural networks. Josh Gruenstein, Jesse Michel, Shiraz, and Joe McCalmon, and Joe McCalmon join us to tell us more about how they scale both teleop data and human interventions from their teleoperators in order to train the policies they need. Watch Episode #85 of RoboPapers, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan, to learn more!

Collecting robot data at scale is key to deploying working manipulation policies, and the team from Tutor Intelligence Tutor is here to tell us about how to accomplish it. Their new announcement: a massive, 100-robot “data factory,” with a behind-the-scenes look at how to build a teleoperation platform and how to make robots and policies that are useful for their customers. Tutor Intelligence is a full-stack robotics company: they build robot arms, they sell robot arms, they write the software and they train neural networks. Josh Gruenstein, Jesse Michel, Shiraz, and Joe McCalmon, and Joe McCalmon join us to tell us more about how they scale both teleop data and human interventions from their teleoperators in order to train the policies they need. Watch Episode #85 of RoboPapers, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan, to learn more!

RoboPapers

36,041 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Robotics has changed dramatically over the last eight years. Ted Xiao has been involved in the cutting edge of robot learning through this period, spending those eight years at Google Brain/Google Deepmind. And he’s identified three eras of robot learning. These eras are: - The Era of Existence Proofs - trying different methods like QT-Opt, on-robot RL - The Era of Foundation Models - transitioning to data collection and clean objectives (i.e. supervised learning) - The Era of Scaling - orders of magnitude more data and larger models, enabling reasoning, long-horizon actions, and cross-embodiment transfer Watch Episode 78 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Jiafei Duan to learn more!

Robotics has changed dramatically over the last eight years. Ted Xiao has been involved in the cutting edge of robot learning through this period, spending those eight years at Google Brain/Google Deepmind. And he’s identified three eras of robot learning. These eras are: - The Era of Existence Proofs - trying different methods like QT-Opt, on-robot RL - The Era of Foundation Models - transitioning to data collection and clean objectives (i.e. supervised learning) - The Era of Scaling - orders of magnitude more data and larger models, enabling reasoning, long-horizon actions, and cross-embodiment transfer Watch Episode 78 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Jiafei Duan to learn more!

RoboPapers

36,838 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Every home is different. That means that to build a useful home robot, we must be able to perform zero-shot generalization on a wide range of tasks. Humanoid company 1X has a solution: world models. 1X Director of Evaluations Daniel Ho joins us on RoboPapers to talk about: - why world models are the future for scaling robot learning - how to use world models for robot control - what world models unlock for evaluating robot model performance - how we can hill-climb from here to general purpose robots Watch Episode #61 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Chris Paxton, now!

Every home is different. That means that to build a useful home robot, we must be able to perform zero-shot generalization on a wide range of tasks. Humanoid company 1X has a solution: world models. 1X Director of Evaluations Daniel Ho joins us on RoboPapers to talk about: - why world models are the future for scaling robot learning - how to use world models for robot control - what world models unlock for evaluating robot model performance - how we can hill-climb from here to general purpose robots Watch Episode #61 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Chris Paxton, now!

RoboPapers

28,039 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Reinforcement learning has unlocked tremendous gains in broader AI and humanoid robot whole body control, but still has yet to deliver strong results for robot manipulation due to the difficulty of capturing tasks in an accurate simulation; one way to fix this is to create complex environments with learned world models. But learning fully within world models is often intractable as powerful world models are computationally too expensive. Instead, Joseph Amigo and Rooholla Khorrambakht propose to break the problem down: into a large-scale world model that can generate forward trajectories, and a lightweight, low-dimensional latent-space model which can approximate local dynamics of a problem, without needing to back-propagate through a heavy global model. What this means: you can do reinforcement learning in this coupled local-global world model, and learn contact rich skills for a robot. To learn more, watch Episode #101 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Jiafei Duan!

Reinforcement learning has unlocked tremendous gains in broader AI and humanoid robot whole body control, but still has yet to deliver strong results for robot manipulation due to the difficulty of capturing tasks in an accurate simulation; one way to fix this is to create complex environments with learned world models. But learning fully within world models is often intractable as powerful world models are computationally too expensive. Instead, Joseph Amigo and Rooholla Khorrambakht propose to break the problem down: into a large-scale world model that can generate forward trajectories, and a lightweight, low-dimensional latent-space model which can approximate local dynamics of a problem, without needing to back-propagate through a heavy global model. What this means: you can do reinforcement learning in this coupled local-global world model, and learn contact rich skills for a robot. To learn more, watch Episode #101 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Jiafei Duan!

RoboPapers

16,866 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Spatial understanding is important to moving around in complex environments and is a huge part of the challenge of generalizing to new scenes. Most world models, however, largely ignore this spatial dimension, focusing on 2D images. Not PointWorld, though. PointWorld is a 3D world model trained from real and simulated data which can perform a wide variety of manipulation tasks on a real robot, including grasping or handling articulated objects, all without any additional fine tuning. Wenlong Huang joins us to tell us more about what makes this work and how it’s different from other world models. Watch Episode #83 of RoboPapers, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan, to learn more!

Spatial understanding is important to moving around in complex environments and is a huge part of the challenge of generalizing to new scenes. Most world models, however, largely ignore this spatial dimension, focusing on 2D images. Not PointWorld, though. PointWorld is a 3D world model trained from real and simulated data which can perform a wide variety of manipulation tasks on a real robot, including grasping or handling articulated objects, all without any additional fine tuning. Wenlong Huang joins us to tell us more about what makes this work and how it’s different from other world models. Watch Episode #83 of RoboPapers, with Chris Paxton and Jiafei Duan, to learn more!

RoboPapers

16,197 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Learning policies via imitation is extremely potent, but making sure those policies will generalize to out of distribution settings is still very hard. SAILOR proposes a solution in learning to search via a learned world model, which outperforms existing imitation approaches. Gokul Swamy, Arnav Jain , and Vibhakar Mohta tell us about their approach. Watch Episode #33 of RoboPapers, co-hosted by Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Chris Paxton , now!

Learning policies via imitation is extremely potent, but making sure those policies will generalize to out of distribution settings is still very hard. SAILOR proposes a solution in learning to search via a learned world model, which outperforms existing imitation approaches. Gokul Swamy, Arnav Jain , and Vibhakar Mohta tell us about their approach. Watch Episode #33 of RoboPapers, co-hosted by Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Chris Paxton , now!

RoboPapers

21,560 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Diffusion Policy was one of the big breakthroughs that has enabled an explosion in real-world robot learning. However, it’s always had a weakness, which is that it works by computing a final action trajectory from random noise, which leads to high latency when predicting a final action sequence. Instead, why not initialize the search based on previous actions? This allows for incredibly fast policy inference and in many cases improved generalization, generating high-quality predictions with sub-ms latency. Jindou Jia and Jianfei Yang join us to explain. Learn more on Episode 95 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Chris Paxton!

Diffusion Policy was one of the big breakthroughs that has enabled an explosion in real-world robot learning. However, it’s always had a weakness, which is that it works by computing a final action trajectory from random noise, which leads to high latency when predicting a final action sequence. Instead, why not initialize the search based on previous actions? This allows for incredibly fast policy inference and in many cases improved generalization, generating high-quality predictions with sub-ms latency. Jindou Jia and Jianfei Yang join us to explain. Learn more on Episode 95 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Chris Paxton!

RoboPapers

28,629 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

How do you know your robot actually succeeded? In v0.6.0, you ask a VLM 🤖 LeRobot ships a new unified reward models API with two zero-shot additions. Robometer is a general-purpose reward model trained on 1M+ trajectories across 21 robot embodiments: point it at any LeRobot dataset and it scores task progress and success straight from video and a language instruction, no task-specific training needed. TOPReward goes even further: no reward weights at all. It wraps an off-the-shelf VLM and reads the log-probability of the token "True" given the video and the instruction. Both come with labeling scripts that write per-frame progress curves into your dataset, ready for reward-aware behavior cloning. More on how they work:

How do you know your robot actually succeeded? In v0.6.0, you ask a VLM 🤖 LeRobot ships a new unified reward models API with two zero-shot additions. Robometer is a general-purpose reward model trained on 1M+ trajectories across 21 robot embodiments: point it at any LeRobot dataset and it scores task progress and success straight from video and a language instruction, no task-specific training needed. TOPReward goes even further: no reward weights at all. It wraps an off-the-shelf VLM and reads the log-probability of the token "True" given the video and the instruction. Both come with labeling scripts that write per-frame progress curves into your dataset, ready for reward-aware behavior cloning. More on how they work:

LeRobot

22,592 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

New Course: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning LLMs with GRPO! Learn to use reinforcement learning to improve your LLM performance in this short course, built in collaboration with Predibase by Rubrik, and taught by Travis Addair, its Co-Founder and CTO, and Arnav Garg, its Senior Engineer and Machine Learning Lead. Reasoning models have been one of the most important developments in LLMs. Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) uses rewards to encourage LLMs to find solutions to multi-step reasoning tasks such as solving math problems and debugging code - without needing pre-existing training examples like in traditional supervised fine-tuning. Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is a reinforcement fine-tuning algorithm gaining rapid adoption. Developed by the DeepSeek team and used to train the R1 reasoning model, GRPO uses reward functions that you can write in Python to assign rewards to model responses. It’s beneficial for tasks with verifiable outcomes and can work well even with fewer than 100 training examples. It can also significantly improve the reasoning ability of smaller LLMs, making applications faster and more cost effective. In this course, you’ll take a technical deep dive into RFT with GRPO. You’ll learn to build reward functions that you can use in the GRPO training process to guide an LLM toward better performance on multi-step reasoning tasks. In detail, you’ll: - Learn when reinforcement fine-tuning is a better fit than supervised fine-tuning, especially for tasks involving multi-step reasoning or limited labeled data. - Understand how GRPO uses programmable reward functions as a more scalable alternative to the human feedback required for other reinforcement learning algorithms, such as RLHF and DPO. - Frame the Wordle game as a reinforcement fine-tuning problem and see how an LLM can learn to plan, analyze feedback, and improve its strategy over time. - Design reward functions that power the reinforcement fine-tuning process. - Learn techniques for evaluating more subjective tasks, such as rating the quality of a text summary, using an LLM as a judge. - Understand why reward hacking happens and how to avoid it by adding penalty functions to discourage undesirable behaviors. - Learn the four key components of the loss calculation in the GRPO algorithm: token probability distribution ratios, advantages, clipping, and KL-divergence. - Launch reinforcement fine-tuning jobs using Predibase’s hosted training services. By the end of this course, you’ll be able to build and fine-tune LLMs using reinforcement learning to improve reasoning without relying on large labeled datasets or subjective human feedback. Please sign up here:

New Course: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning LLMs with GRPO! Learn to use reinforcement learning to improve your LLM performance in this short course, built in collaboration with Predibase by Rubrik, and taught by Travis Addair, its Co-Founder and CTO, and Arnav Garg, its Senior Engineer and Machine Learning Lead. Reasoning models have been one of the most important developments in LLMs. Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) uses rewards to encourage LLMs to find solutions to multi-step reasoning tasks such as solving math problems and debugging code - without needing pre-existing training examples like in traditional supervised fine-tuning. Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is a reinforcement fine-tuning algorithm gaining rapid adoption. Developed by the DeepSeek team and used to train the R1 reasoning model, GRPO uses reward functions that you can write in Python to assign rewards to model responses. It’s beneficial for tasks with verifiable outcomes and can work well even with fewer than 100 training examples. It can also significantly improve the reasoning ability of smaller LLMs, making applications faster and more cost effective. In this course, you’ll take a technical deep dive into RFT with GRPO. You’ll learn to build reward functions that you can use in the GRPO training process to guide an LLM toward better performance on multi-step reasoning tasks. In detail, you’ll: - Learn when reinforcement fine-tuning is a better fit than supervised fine-tuning, especially for tasks involving multi-step reasoning or limited labeled data. - Understand how GRPO uses programmable reward functions as a more scalable alternative to the human feedback required for other reinforcement learning algorithms, such as RLHF and DPO. - Frame the Wordle game as a reinforcement fine-tuning problem and see how an LLM can learn to plan, analyze feedback, and improve its strategy over time. - Design reward functions that power the reinforcement fine-tuning process. - Learn techniques for evaluating more subjective tasks, such as rating the quality of a text summary, using an LLM as a judge. - Understand why reward hacking happens and how to avoid it by adding penalty functions to discourage undesirable behaviors. - Learn the four key components of the loss calculation in the GRPO algorithm: token probability distribution ratios, advantages, clipping, and KL-divergence. - Launch reinforcement fine-tuning jobs using Predibase’s hosted training services. By the end of this course, you’ll be able to build and fine-tune LLMs using reinforcement learning to improve reasoning without relying on large labeled datasets or subjective human feedback. Please sign up here:

Andrew Ng

86,697 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Instead of choosing between training a world model and training a language conditioned robot policy, why not do both? LDA-1B s a new foundation model that is trained on 30,000 hours of human and robot interaction data. Part of the secret is that LDA-1B jointly learns forward dynamics, action prediction, and visual forecasting, all in a structured DINO latent space which avoids the pitfalls of redundant pixel-level prediction which isn’t necessarily aligned robot action. This approach works on both dexterous hands and simple robot grippers; it also generalizes across objects, tasks, and scenes. Jiangran Lyu joins us to explain. Learn more on Episode 98 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Chris Paxton!

Instead of choosing between training a world model and training a language conditioned robot policy, why not do both? LDA-1B s a new foundation model that is trained on 30,000 hours of human and robot interaction data. Part of the secret is that LDA-1B jointly learns forward dynamics, action prediction, and visual forecasting, all in a structured DINO latent space which avoids the pitfalls of redundant pixel-level prediction which isn’t necessarily aligned robot action. This approach works on both dexterous hands and simple robot grippers; it also generalizes across objects, tasks, and scenes. Jiangran Lyu joins us to explain. Learn more on Episode 98 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Chris Paxton!

RoboPapers

16,345 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Instead of asking a VLM to output progress, it reads the model’s internal belief directly from token logits. No in-context learning. No fine-tuning. No reward training. 📈 We introduce: TOPReward, a zero-shot reward modeling approach for robotics using token probabilities from pretrained video VLMs. The simplest way of doing reward modelling for robotics! Project: 🧵👇

Instead of asking a VLM to output progress, it reads the model’s internal belief directly from token logits. No in-context learning. No fine-tuning. No reward training. 📈 We introduce: TOPReward, a zero-shot reward modeling approach for robotics using token probabilities from pretrained video VLMs. The simplest way of doing reward modelling for robotics! Project: 🧵👇

Jiafei Duan

108,387 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten