Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Lee Jae-myung’s administration promised to ease regulations on American companies as part of a trade deal, but instead fined Coupang $410 million while fining Chinese company Temu less than $1 million for a massive data breach. This is not fair enforcement. It is protectionism that targets American businesses while...

kangminlee's profile picture

Kangmin Lee | 이강민

250,198 subscribers

11,669 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Look at how Lee Jae-myung’s tone changes when talking about a Chinese hacker versus an American company, Coupang. When a reporter asked why many Koreans hate China—pointing to Chinese crimes against Korea such as the Coupang data breach—Lee responded so dismissively and said: “The hacker was Chinese. So what?” Yet when the Coupang data breach first surfaced in the media, he called for crushing fines and punitive damages, and at one point even said the company could be shut down. Lee condemned Koreans for hating China over crimes committed against them. Lee condemned an American company operating in Korea for being hacked by the Chinese. But when it came to China, rather than condemning the many crimes Chinese actors have committed against Koreans, he chose to threaten Koreans with punishment for criticizing or insulting Chinese people.
1:31

Look at how Lee Jae-myung’s tone changes when talking about a Chinese hacker versus an American company, Coupang. When a reporter asked why many Koreans hate China—pointing to Chinese crimes against Korea such as the Coupang data breach—Lee responded so dismissively and said: “The hacker was Chinese. So what?” Yet when the Coupang data breach first surfaced in the media, he called for crushing fines and punitive damages, and at one point even said the company could be shut down. Lee condemned Koreans for hating China over crimes committed against them. Lee condemned an American company operating in Korea for being hacked by the Chinese. But when it came to China, rather than condemning the many crimes Chinese actors have committed against Koreans, he chose to threaten Koreans with punishment for criticizing or insulting Chinese people.

ViiV

12,139 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The left in Korea just won a bunch of governor and mayor races. Now they control even more local power. This is bad. The DPK is anti-America and pro-China. They attack American companies, raid US military bases, and roll out the red carpet for Chinese firms like Alibaba, Temu, and BYD while letting Chinese nationals buy up land and houses. Meanwhile, American influence brings some good things, but it also pushes feminism, LGBTQ ideology, and BLM nonsense into Korean society. As a Korean, you should judge foreign influence by whether it helps or harms Korea. As an American, you should care because a left-wing Korea is a China-friendly Korea. And China is our number one geopolitical enemy.
5:03

The left in Korea just won a bunch of governor and mayor races. Now they control even more local power. This is bad. The DPK is anti-America and pro-China. They attack American companies, raid US military bases, and roll out the red carpet for Chinese firms like Alibaba, Temu, and BYD while letting Chinese nationals buy up land and houses. Meanwhile, American influence brings some good things, but it also pushes feminism, LGBTQ ideology, and BLM nonsense into Korean society. As a Korean, you should judge foreign influence by whether it helps or harms Korea. As an American, you should care because a left-wing Korea is a China-friendly Korea. And China is our number one geopolitical enemy.

Kangmin Lee | 이강민

60,093 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

China is the second largest market in the world, so of course businesses want access to it. The problem is they don’t play by the same rules. For years, companies have dealt with intellectual property theft, uneven legal systems, and an environment where American businesses don’t get the same protections or leverage Chinese companies receive. That’s the real dilemma, how do you do business with a market that many now see not as a partner, but as a strategic competitor? That’s why tariffs and tougher policies have become part of the conversation. This isn’t about the Chinese people it’s about the actions and ambitions of the Chinese government.
1:43

China is the second largest market in the world, so of course businesses want access to it. The problem is they don’t play by the same rules. For years, companies have dealt with intellectual property theft, uneven legal systems, and an environment where American businesses don’t get the same protections or leverage Chinese companies receive. That’s the real dilemma, how do you do business with a market that many now see not as a partner, but as a strategic competitor? That’s why tariffs and tougher policies have become part of the conversation. This isn’t about the Chinese people it’s about the actions and ambitions of the Chinese government.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

26,275 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Four American firms, Surge AI, Mercor, AfterQuery and Turing are turning the expertise of U.S. coders, physicians, lawyers, engineers and scientists into the training data that gives leading AI models their edge. If any of these companies are supplying the CCP or the Chinese military with the SAME sensitive data while also bidding for U.S. Army or Pentagon contracts, they should be disqualified. Why should China get access to the same American expertise and datasets being used to train our own AI? Washington’s inaction is allowing the CCP to gain access to the American expertise that gives our AI systems their strategic edge. I hope the Trump administration is keeping an eye on this.
2:17

Four American firms, Surge AI, Mercor, AfterQuery and Turing are turning the expertise of U.S. coders, physicians, lawyers, engineers and scientists into the training data that gives leading AI models their edge. If any of these companies are supplying the CCP or the Chinese military with the SAME sensitive data while also bidding for U.S. Army or Pentagon contracts, they should be disqualified. Why should China get access to the same American expertise and datasets being used to train our own AI? Washington’s inaction is allowing the CCP to gain access to the American expertise that gives our AI systems their strategic edge. I hope the Trump administration is keeping an eye on this.

Laura Loomer

154,423 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

We also have stories of hundreds of companies that have been on Shark Tank that also manufactured their product in China. As soon as they get to five million in sales domestically, the same factories that are making it there knock it off and sell it at a 40% discount. They never have to recoup the R&D that the company put into making the product in the first place, and they get wiped out a different way. China just totally ignore the IP and the entrepreneur can't go back and litigate. The crazy thing is Chinese companies use the American legal system to sue American companies after they've knocked them off. Why is that okay? The Megyn Kelly Show
1:09

We also have stories of hundreds of companies that have been on Shark Tank that also manufactured their product in China. As soon as they get to five million in sales domestically, the same factories that are making it there knock it off and sell it at a 40% discount. They never have to recoup the R&D that the company put into making the product in the first place, and they get wiped out a different way. China just totally ignore the IP and the entrepreneur can't go back and litigate. The crazy thing is Chinese companies use the American legal system to sue American companies after they've knocked them off. Why is that okay? The Megyn Kelly Show

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

209,161 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

David Sacks: Anthropic Is Trying to Crush Open Source AI and the American Developers Who Use It David Sacks: “I know people don't have a lot of sympathy for Chinese companies, that's fine. I'm not defending Chinese companies. I'm defending American developers who need to be able to use everything in the public domain. And let me give you an example. Cursor rolled out its new product, Composer 2. They were able to post-train that model using Kimi K2.5 on their own proprietary coding data. They started with a Chinese open source model, and then they used their own data, and they came up with a new derivative product. This is the way that open source works. You take things that are in the public domain, you fork them, you make them your own. And by the way, once it's in the public domain, it's not a Chinese model anymore. No data is going back to China, nothing's going back to China. An American company has taken open source contributions in the public domain, made it their own, and then developed their own model. And if you say that American companies can't do that, or that somehow it's tainted with IP theft, you are basically going to put a dagger through the heart of the entire American open source ecosystem. And that is exactly what Anthropic wants, because they do not want to have the competition.”
0:59

David Sacks: Anthropic Is Trying to Crush Open Source AI and the American Developers Who Use It David Sacks: “I know people don't have a lot of sympathy for Chinese companies, that's fine. I'm not defending Chinese companies. I'm defending American developers who need to be able to use everything in the public domain. And let me give you an example. Cursor rolled out its new product, Composer 2. They were able to post-train that model using Kimi K2.5 on their own proprietary coding data. They started with a Chinese open source model, and then they used their own data, and they came up with a new derivative product. This is the way that open source works. You take things that are in the public domain, you fork them, you make them your own. And by the way, once it's in the public domain, it's not a Chinese model anymore. No data is going back to China, nothing's going back to China. An American company has taken open source contributions in the public domain, made it their own, and then developed their own model. And if you say that American companies can't do that, or that somehow it's tainted with IP theft, you are basically going to put a dagger through the heart of the entire American open source ecosystem. And that is exactly what Anthropic wants, because they do not want to have the competition.”

The All-In Podcast

277,924 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Following the release of Kimi K3, tylercowen explains why trying to ban Chinese open-source AI models is a losing strategy and that American companies should compete instead. "Open source is coming and is here, whether we like it or not. Of course, a lot of it will be from China. We should allow American competitors to proceed on an even footing. But the attempt to outlaw it, ban it, or use sanctions against it is going to fail miserably.” "I plead that the Trump administration gives up on this crusade. It will not work."
0:46

Following the release of Kimi K3, tylercowen explains why trying to ban Chinese open-source AI models is a losing strategy and that American companies should compete instead. "Open source is coming and is here, whether we like it or not. Of course, a lot of it will be from China. We should allow American competitors to proceed on an even footing. But the attempt to outlaw it, ban it, or use sanctions against it is going to fail miserably.” "I plead that the Trump administration gives up on this crusade. It will not work."

TBPN

137,380 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 NOW: The House Homeland Security Committee just launched an investigation into CHINESE INFILTRATION of America's AI industry And Sen. Bernie Sanders wants us to *COOPERATE* with the CCP, handing them wins, instead of competing Traitor. China is being accused to surging themselves into American companies and STEALING our AI property while spying on Americans "This investigation is focusing on two major companies, the chairs of House Homeland Security Committee and the House Select Committee on China, sending letters to Airbnb and AnySphere." "That's the parent company of Cursor, one of the fastest-growing AI companies ever, demanding that executives assist their probe." "Lawmakers say Chinese firms have been running what they call a spying campaign to, quote, accelerate its AI capabilities through the exploitation of American innovation." "They're using tactics like espionage, intellectual property theft, an unauthorized model distillation to extract capabilities from leading U.S. systems and then repackaging them into new models without the same safety guardrails." "Airbnb CEO said publicly that the company relies heavily on Alibaba's Chinese-developed Qwen model for customer service, calling it, quote, fast and cheap." "Both Airbnb and Cursor have not responded to our request for comment. One of the Republicans leading this investigation says this should be a cause for alarm for Americans."
2:17

🚨 NOW: The House Homeland Security Committee just launched an investigation into CHINESE INFILTRATION of America's AI industry And Sen. Bernie Sanders wants us to *COOPERATE* with the CCP, handing them wins, instead of competing Traitor. China is being accused to surging themselves into American companies and STEALING our AI property while spying on Americans "This investigation is focusing on two major companies, the chairs of House Homeland Security Committee and the House Select Committee on China, sending letters to Airbnb and AnySphere." "That's the parent company of Cursor, one of the fastest-growing AI companies ever, demanding that executives assist their probe." "Lawmakers say Chinese firms have been running what they call a spying campaign to, quote, accelerate its AI capabilities through the exploitation of American innovation." "They're using tactics like espionage, intellectual property theft, an unauthorized model distillation to extract capabilities from leading U.S. systems and then repackaging them into new models without the same safety guardrails." "Airbnb CEO said publicly that the company relies heavily on Alibaba's Chinese-developed Qwen model for customer service, calling it, quote, fast and cheap." "Both Airbnb and Cursor have not responded to our request for comment. One of the Republicans leading this investigation says this should be a cause for alarm for Americans."

Eric Daugherty

24,332 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

In the next decade, over 1 million Chinese Communists will be able to vote in American elections. Thanks to birth tourism, Chinese billionaires are paying surrogates to birth their children on U.S. soil so that the babies are American citizens. "That wave is going to start to really crest beginning in 2030. And when you look at...the Chinese birth tourism companies, there's more than 1,000 of them today operating in China. They advertise openly in China. The Chinese government has encouraged this. The Chinese government is allowing this massive industry to operate. Members of the Chinese Communist Party elite are doing this." -Peter Schweizer
2:23

In the next decade, over 1 million Chinese Communists will be able to vote in American elections. Thanks to birth tourism, Chinese billionaires are paying surrogates to birth their children on U.S. soil so that the babies are American citizens. "That wave is going to start to really crest beginning in 2030. And when you look at...the Chinese birth tourism companies, there's more than 1,000 of them today operating in China. They advertise openly in China. The Chinese government has encouraged this. The Chinese government is allowing this massive industry to operate. Members of the Chinese Communist Party elite are doing this." -Peter Schweizer

Liz Wheeler

53,634 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

For years, pro-American voices in China have been spreading a myth: that Americans enjoy free, high-quality healthcare. But first-hand accounts from Chinese and American users on Xiaohongshu have shattered that illusion. While the West still sells healthcare as a moral performance, China is increasingly delivering it as a survival system. That is why foreign patients are coming. Not for propaganda. Not for aesthetics. But for speed, complex surgery, lower costs, and AI that actually works in hospitals instead of just on conference stages. People do not cross borders for “values.” They cross borders when one system can save them faster than another.
3:12

For years, pro-American voices in China have been spreading a myth: that Americans enjoy free, high-quality healthcare. But first-hand accounts from Chinese and American users on Xiaohongshu have shattered that illusion. While the West still sells healthcare as a moral performance, China is increasingly delivering it as a survival system. That is why foreign patients are coming. Not for propaganda. Not for aesthetics. But for speed, complex surgery, lower costs, and AI that actually works in hospitals instead of just on conference stages. People do not cross borders for “values.” They cross borders when one system can save them faster than another.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

14,269 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said China often has access to the European market in ways that European companies do not enjoy with the same ease in China. He said Europe cannot allow China to have one set of rules while European companies operate under a completely different set of rules. That is the punchline. For years, Europe has restricted or excluded Chinese companies under the language of “security.” Huawei. ZTE. Chinese telecom firms. Chinese solar products. Chinese EVs. Chinese batteries. Chinese infrastructure. Whenever Chinese companies become too competitive, Europe suddenly discovers “risk,” “dependency,” “distortion,” or “strategic vulnerability.” But when China responds with its own controls, tariffs, rare earth restrictions, or market measures, Europe starts crying about fairness. Classic. China has not banned European industrial giants from the Chinese market the way Europe has tried to politically suffocate Chinese companies. Volkswagen, BMW, Mercedes, Airbus, Siemens, BASF, Schneider, LVMH, and countless European firms have made fortunes in China for decades. China opened its market, built supply chains, created demand, and let European companies profit massively. Europe took the money. Then it blocked Chinese firms, joined U.S. containment, restricted high-end exports, attacked Chinese clean-tech industries, and now complains that China enjoys unfair access. If Europe really wants “one set of rules,” it should be careful what it asks for. Because China can play that game too. The difference is simple: Europe complains about access while using access as a weapon. China has shown restraint. Perhaps too much restraint. If Beijing treated European companies the way Europe treats Chinese companies, Brussels would discover very quickly what “same rules” actually means.
1:11

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said China often has access to the European market in ways that European companies do not enjoy with the same ease in China. He said Europe cannot allow China to have one set of rules while European companies operate under a completely different set of rules. That is the punchline. For years, Europe has restricted or excluded Chinese companies under the language of “security.” Huawei. ZTE. Chinese telecom firms. Chinese solar products. Chinese EVs. Chinese batteries. Chinese infrastructure. Whenever Chinese companies become too competitive, Europe suddenly discovers “risk,” “dependency,” “distortion,” or “strategic vulnerability.” But when China responds with its own controls, tariffs, rare earth restrictions, or market measures, Europe starts crying about fairness. Classic. China has not banned European industrial giants from the Chinese market the way Europe has tried to politically suffocate Chinese companies. Volkswagen, BMW, Mercedes, Airbus, Siemens, BASF, Schneider, LVMH, and countless European firms have made fortunes in China for decades. China opened its market, built supply chains, created demand, and let European companies profit massively. Europe took the money. Then it blocked Chinese firms, joined U.S. containment, restricted high-end exports, attacked Chinese clean-tech industries, and now complains that China enjoys unfair access. If Europe really wants “one set of rules,” it should be careful what it asks for. Because China can play that game too. The difference is simple: Europe complains about access while using access as a weapon. China has shown restraint. Perhaps too much restraint. If Beijing treated European companies the way Europe treats Chinese companies, Brussels would discover very quickly what “same rules” actually means.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

27,677 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The American AI company AfterQuery AfterQuery is reportedly generating at least $50 MILLION in recurring revenue from Chinese AI labs while maintaining ties to Ant Group Ant Group and Alibaba, two major Chinese technology companies. Its CEO Spencer Mateega publicly celebrated Moonshot AI’s Kimi model for topping an AfterQuery benchmark and called the Chinese team “cracked.”Moonshot AI is a Chinese AI company based in Beijing, China American AI executives are traveling to China, hiring China engagement managers and openly praising the Chinese models competing to overtake the United States in AI dominance. How many warning signs does Washington need before it stops American AI companies from helping China overtake the United States in the AI race? David Sacks
1:20

The American AI company AfterQuery AfterQuery is reportedly generating at least $50 MILLION in recurring revenue from Chinese AI labs while maintaining ties to Ant Group Ant Group and Alibaba, two major Chinese technology companies. Its CEO Spencer Mateega publicly celebrated Moonshot AI’s Kimi model for topping an AfterQuery benchmark and called the Chinese team “cracked.”Moonshot AI is a Chinese AI company based in Beijing, China American AI executives are traveling to China, hiring China engagement managers and openly praising the Chinese models competing to overtake the United States in AI dominance. How many warning signs does Washington need before it stops American AI companies from helping China overtake the United States in the AI race? David Sacks

Laura Loomer

62,740 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

🇰🇵🇺🇸 BIG | North Korea has built a secret workforce inside American companies, using stolen identities and artificial intelligence to quietly funnel hundreds of millions of dollars from the U.S. economy directly into Kim Jong Un’s regime. According to The Wall Street Journal, thousands of North Korean IT operatives are securing remote jobs with U.S. companies while posing as American workers. One cell alone applied to more than 1,000 companies in just three months, using AI to create résumés, cover letters and interview responses, and even to digitally swap faces during recruitment. Operatives can hold several jobs simultaneously under different stolen identities, with some earning as much as $300,000 per year. Up to 90% of those earnings can ultimately be transferred back to North Korea, while the entire operation is estimated to generate as much as $800 million annually. The scheme shows how Pyongyang is adapting sanctions evasion to the AI and remote-work era. Instead of relying only on traditional smuggling and illicit trade, North Korea has effectively turned Western companies themselves into an unwitting source of hard currency, with part of the proceeds feeding a weapons program that directly threatens the U.S. and its allies. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

🇰🇵🇺🇸 BIG | North Korea has built a secret workforce inside American companies, using stolen identities and artificial intelligence to quietly funnel hundreds of millions of dollars from the U.S. economy directly into Kim Jong Un’s regime. According to The Wall Street Journal, thousands of North Korean IT operatives are securing remote jobs with U.S. companies while posing as American workers. One cell alone applied to more than 1,000 companies in just three months, using AI to create résumés, cover letters and interview responses, and even to digitally swap faces during recruitment. Operatives can hold several jobs simultaneously under different stolen identities, with some earning as much as $300,000 per year. Up to 90% of those earnings can ultimately be transferred back to North Korea, while the entire operation is estimated to generate as much as $800 million annually. The scheme shows how Pyongyang is adapting sanctions evasion to the AI and remote-work era. Instead of relying only on traditional smuggling and illicit trade, North Korea has effectively turned Western companies themselves into an unwitting source of hard currency, with part of the proceeds feeding a weapons program that directly threatens the U.S. and its allies. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

25,551 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

🚨SHOCKING: Senator Chuck Schumer passionately advocates for a 27.5% tariff on China in 2005! "It says to the Chinese that their unfair trade policies have got to end. The Chinese have enjoyed a yuge trade surplus with the U.S. Every year it gets larger and larger." "Much of that trade surplus is because the Chinese don't play fair. They don't let our goods into their country. I can tell you company after company in New York who cannot sell goods in China or can only sell them under impossible conditions." "The Chinese make no effort to prevent the ripping off of our intellectual property. These are our crown jewels. The thinking. The great creativity. The great entrepreneurialness of the American business community is just taken, and they shrug their shoulders." "And worse of all, the Chinese pile on and add unfair rules that violate free trade. And at the top of that list is the fact that the Chinese peg their currency abnormally low, so their exports get a 27% advantage here in the U.S. and our imports get a 27% disadvantage when sold in China. Every tenet of free trade, if you believe in it, says they should not peg their currency." "What does this mean for America? It means a yuge job loss. We have suffered dramatically in manufacturing jobs, service jobs, and other jobs. It means we have a huge trade deficit. It means the dollar sinks to abysmally low levels, threatening our wealth, and it creates chaos in the whole world trading system." "We are fed up, Mr. President. How can we stand by as millions of American workers lose their jobs? As thousands of American companies can't compete fairly? As our country as a whole has wealth drained from it?" "What we seek is fairness in trade. The Chinese do not play by the rules. We have talked and talked and talked to them. The time for action is now. If not now, when? If not us, who? Millions of American workers and thousands of American businesses look to us to set things right, and today, by passing the Schumer-Graham amendment, we can do that." Tagging Chuck Schumer — he’ll see your comments!
5:29

🚨SHOCKING: Senator Chuck Schumer passionately advocates for a 27.5% tariff on China in 2005! "It says to the Chinese that their unfair trade policies have got to end. The Chinese have enjoyed a yuge trade surplus with the U.S. Every year it gets larger and larger." "Much of that trade surplus is because the Chinese don't play fair. They don't let our goods into their country. I can tell you company after company in New York who cannot sell goods in China or can only sell them under impossible conditions." "The Chinese make no effort to prevent the ripping off of our intellectual property. These are our crown jewels. The thinking. The great creativity. The great entrepreneurialness of the American business community is just taken, and they shrug their shoulders." "And worse of all, the Chinese pile on and add unfair rules that violate free trade. And at the top of that list is the fact that the Chinese peg their currency abnormally low, so their exports get a 27% advantage here in the U.S. and our imports get a 27% disadvantage when sold in China. Every tenet of free trade, if you believe in it, says they should not peg their currency." "What does this mean for America? It means a yuge job loss. We have suffered dramatically in manufacturing jobs, service jobs, and other jobs. It means we have a huge trade deficit. It means the dollar sinks to abysmally low levels, threatening our wealth, and it creates chaos in the whole world trading system." "We are fed up, Mr. President. How can we stand by as millions of American workers lose their jobs? As thousands of American companies can't compete fairly? As our country as a whole has wealth drained from it?" "What we seek is fairness in trade. The Chinese do not play by the rules. We have talked and talked and talked to them. The time for action is now. If not now, when? If not us, who? Millions of American workers and thousands of American businesses look to us to set things right, and today, by passing the Schumer-Graham amendment, we can do that." Tagging Chuck Schumer — he’ll see your comments!

KanekoaTheGreat

1,475,067 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 China just announced — on Saturday, after Trump’s Beijing summit — that it will reduce tariffs on American farm products. This is being framed as a Trump trade win. Here is the part that framing leaves out. US farm exports to China collapsed 65.7% last year. They fell to $8.4 billion. China had been one of the top three buyers of American crops. Trump’s tariffs closed that market. China retaliated with its own tariffs. American farmers lost a year of sales while Brazil and Argentina took the business. Brazil’s soybean exports to China hit a record 85 million metric tons in 2025. Today’s “win” is China agreeing to partly reopen the door the US closed.
0:45

🚨 China just announced — on Saturday, after Trump’s Beijing summit — that it will reduce tariffs on American farm products. This is being framed as a Trump trade win. Here is the part that framing leaves out. US farm exports to China collapsed 65.7% last year. They fell to $8.4 billion. China had been one of the top three buyers of American crops. Trump’s tariffs closed that market. China retaliated with its own tariffs. American farmers lost a year of sales while Brazil and Argentina took the business. Brazil’s soybean exports to China hit a record 85 million metric tons in 2025. Today’s “win” is China agreeing to partly reopen the door the US closed.

Brian Allen

180,980 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: Israel is not a structure that produces power on its own. There is a mindset here that has managed to hack the American political system through Zionism. What the United States does in this region does not serve its own interests, but benefits Israel. So why does the United States do this? It is not a rational model of behavior. It happens when you influence (American) politics.
1:28

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: Israel is not a structure that produces power on its own. There is a mindset here that has managed to hack the American political system through Zionism. What the United States does in this region does not serve its own interests, but benefits Israel. So why does the United States do this? It is not a rational model of behavior. It happens when you influence (American) politics.

Clash Report

124,695 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

New technology now allows organs to be profused for days instead of hours. For the free world this is a medical breakthrough that could save countless lives. In the hands of the CCP it could become something far darker. It creates a potential pathway for the CCP’s kill to order forced organ harvesting industry to preserve and ship organs far beyond China’s borders. At the same time American universities, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies continue helping sustain this industry many without realizing it and others because the financial incentives are too great to ignore. American institutions partner with Chinese transplant centers. American companies supply the drugs and technologies used in these procedures. The NIH has funded joint research tied to China’s transplant system. The New York Times even stopped one of its own reporters from pursuing evidence of forced organ harvesting in China. This is not an isolated atrocity. It is part of a broader pattern of persecution, dehumanization, and genocide against the Uyghurs and Falun Gong carried out by the Chinese Communist Party.
1:38

New technology now allows organs to be profused for days instead of hours. For the free world this is a medical breakthrough that could save countless lives. In the hands of the CCP it could become something far darker. It creates a potential pathway for the CCP’s kill to order forced organ harvesting industry to preserve and ship organs far beyond China’s borders. At the same time American universities, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies continue helping sustain this industry many without realizing it and others because the financial incentives are too great to ignore. American institutions partner with Chinese transplant centers. American companies supply the drugs and technologies used in these procedures. The NIH has funded joint research tied to China’s transplant system. The New York Times even stopped one of its own reporters from pursuing evidence of forced organ harvesting in China. This is not an isolated atrocity. It is part of a broader pattern of persecution, dehumanization, and genocide against the Uyghurs and Falun Gong carried out by the Chinese Communist Party.

Jan Jekielek

11,976 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: "Israel is not a structure that produces power on its own. There is a mindset here that has managed to hack the American political system through Zionism. What the United States does in this region does not serve its own interests, but benefits Israel. So why does the United States do this? It is not a rational model of behavior. It happens when you influence (American) politics."
1:28

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: "Israel is not a structure that produces power on its own. There is a mindset here that has managed to hack the American political system through Zionism. What the United States does in this region does not serve its own interests, but benefits Israel. So why does the United States do this? It is not a rational model of behavior. It happens when you influence (American) politics."

Open Source Intel

67,752 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten