Let's be logical

No logic on her part.

We don’t call it forcing a parent to care for their disabled child. The law just stops them from killing the child to avoid the burden. Same logic with abortion if the unborn is a person. No forcing.

Dresses like a witch Advocates for killing children Sometimes they really just tell you who they are

Women actually have 2 rights men don’t: The right to murder fetuses No compulsory draft

Yes I will call it "forcing her to carry", so what, irrelevant semantics. Were going to stop you from butchering babies and were going to press charges on those that do it. Its very simple

Her "logic" informed her choice to wear that hat and get herself tatted up.

Rape accounts for less than 2% of abortions btw. And they don't think it's only valid in cases of rape, so it's a moot point.

Love your work and content but I think you will come across much better if you stop chewing gum during dialogue.

"If you don't give me surgery to remove my poop, then you're FORCING me to have a bowel movement"

Fat, stupid glasses, leg tats, and bird-hand talking. This pig checks all the boxes!

Would love to see some honest and rational sociologists and physiologists study why stupid people clap their hands when they’re trying to emphasize points.🤷‍♂️

@birdhandfinder

Please read this for your own potential benefit. I really like your stuff and watching this one, I had a novel thought for an argument to add to your pile. I don't know if no one has thought of this before, that's probably an overstatement, but I haven't seen it. The reference is to common law "good Samaritan" obligations. Under the common law, once you have chosen to intervene to help an injured person, you have an affirmative duty of care to continue rendering aid at least until you can leave them in a situation where they are no worse off than when you started. For example, if you decide to drag someone out of a burning car, but you leave them in the middle of the road where they might get run over, you've probably breached the good Samaritan law. The parallel to abortion is that by choosing to start a life, you have chosen to intervene in the care of another human being. Under the same good Samaritan concept, you're obligated to continue rendering care until such point as you can leave them "no worse off". Obviously murdering them through abortion would be leaving them worse off. I just wanted to share this because you can probably develop it further if you haven't already come across this angle.

Another male “abolitionist”. They always seem to be a bearded dude. Never a woman. Because women (and most men) think forced gestation by threat of prosecution is insane. Her logic is correct, he is deliberately ignoring it.

If your choices are either: Continue to carry the child, or kill the child. The decision should be pretty clear.

Russell, how the hell can you talk to retards with a straight face, my Goodness, more power to you my man

So the woman is advocating for women to be the only rapist that can commit murder too? She keeps acting like all abortion Women want is from rape but its almost never is the case but when women rape men they're ok with abortion because she's already raped a man

The choice for over 99% of cases was to have sex. That's when the decision was made. You should't make others suffer fatally for you to unburden your consequences. #bancosmeticabortion

You defeated the evil wizard

Her gears are turning, almost like they are turning in a way they haven't before.

Cause & effect seems to impossible for most people to grasp. I want to see a more simple explanation of cause & effect for these people. You chose X, that caused Y, you can't unchoose X now. They buy things, it should be easy to demonstrate with choice coins & result products.

I think maybe her wizard hat is blocking her brain cells from communicating to each other. ABRA KADABRA!!!!

Dunning-Kruger personified