Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Let's take a tactical moment and think about this. Perhaps not guilty on 2 charges (Likely leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death She was screaming at him after she left him and Murder 2 *Likely think this is too harsh) But what about the other charges... show more

Jennifer Coffindaffer

117,903 subscribers

60,048 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнес Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Domesticated-Goddess

Domesticated-Goddess1 год назад

That’s not a “tactical moment”—it’s grasping at straws. You’re bending over backward to make a narrative fit that’s been crumbling from day one. If the facts actually supported OUI Manslaughter, the case wouldn’t be built on innuendo, character assassination, and junk science.1/2

Фото профиля TinyElvis

TinyElvis1 год назад

"Why in the heck would they go home just to discuss OUI?" Umm, maybe because they're still not unanimous???

Фото профиля Elaine S

Elaine S1 год назад

I think this is what they’re doing too.

Фото профиля BostonLady29

BostonLady291 год назад

I wish the judge would give the jurors a clear answer to their questions. The jurors have a heavy burden & should not be confused as to how to fill out the verdict slip. They don't need the added headache of a confusing verdict slip.

Фото профиля Stark

Stark1 год назад

That’s what I said!

Фото профиля Jennifer Coffindaffer

Jennifer Coffindaffer1 год назад

Awesome Stark. We are on the same page!

Фото профиля TrueCrimeFanGirl

TrueCrimeFanGirl1 год назад

Except they specifically asked about #5 and to get there they had to be not guilty on the rest. That is where they are hung.

Фото профиля Megan Cross

Megan Cross1 год назад

They literally brought up 2-5 lmao. You are so ridiculous. I don’t know how anyone can spin this, but if anyone, definitely you. 😂😂

Фото профиля Sl88

Sl881 год назад

For me the 5:07 video KR backing out of John’s driveway says she innocent! If you see red ( any red at all ) in this picture she did not hit John O’Keefe . It’s that simple!

Фото профиля Lucy, nurse for the people not profits.

Lucy, nurse for the people not profits.1 год назад

You clearly are not familiar with zoomers. They are hung up on the OUI because they take Ubers everywhere & scoff at people who drink & drive. I imagine there’s one or two holdouts and they’re trying to compromise with them.

Похожие видео

JUROR RON & "JUROR E" Did the jury vote Not Guilty on ALL 3 of the MAIN charges? Karen Read faced 3 charges in trial 1: 1. Second degree murder 2. OUI Manslaughter 3. Leaving the scene of a accident resulting in death •The trial was ultimately declared a mistrial. Since then, multiple jurors have came forward to both the defense & CW, stating that they unanimously voted Not Guilty on charges 1 & 3. •Unlike charges 1 & 3, charge 2 "OUI manslaughter" had lesser included charges attached to it. To consider the "lesser included charges" you'd first have to find KR Not Guilty on the upper charge. The lessers Include: - Involuntary Manslaughter - Motor Vehicle homicide • On July 18th, Alan Jackson filed an affidavit. "Juror E" came forward in to tell their accounts of what happened in deliberations... "Juror E went on to state that the only count on which the jury was deadlocked was in relation to the "lower charges" on Count 2." (PHOTO BELOW) Key words: ***LOWER CHARGES*** •During Aidan Kearney interview with Ron, he reveals something that supports "Juror Es" account from July 18th. •While discussing the deliberations regarding count 2, Ron states the following: "The one charge that we were NOT all in agreement on was the one charge, involuntary manslaughter" (VIDEO BELOW) Involuntary manslaughter is one of the "Lesser Charges on count 2" (Juror E) **In a previous interview, Ron makes it clear that he did not reach out to the lawyers. (PICTURE BELOW) meaning Ron & juror E were not the same person. We now have 2 jurors that have made the statement that they were hung on the lesser included charge when it comes to count 2 "OUI Manslaughter" From an interview with Ted Daniels, Alan Jackson seems to agree. (VIDEO BELOW) Karen Read should have been & should still be acquitted on all 3 of the main charges against her. In every other court case in every other courtroom across the country, that's what would have happened. But not in Norfolk County, not against the CW or Massachusetts and certainly not with Judge Cannone.

JUROR RON & "JUROR E" Did the jury vote Not Guilty on ALL 3 of the MAIN charges? Karen Read faced 3 charges in trial 1: 1. Second degree murder 2. OUI Manslaughter 3. Leaving the scene of a accident resulting in death •The trial was ultimately declared a mistrial. Since then, multiple jurors have came forward to both the defense & CW, stating that they unanimously voted Not Guilty on charges 1 & 3. •Unlike charges 1 & 3, charge 2 "OUI manslaughter" had lesser included charges attached to it. To consider the "lesser included charges" you'd first have to find KR Not Guilty on the upper charge. The lessers Include: - Involuntary Manslaughter - Motor Vehicle homicide • On July 18th, Alan Jackson filed an affidavit. "Juror E" came forward in to tell their accounts of what happened in deliberations... "Juror E went on to state that the only count on which the jury was deadlocked was in relation to the "lower charges" on Count 2." (PHOTO BELOW) Key words: LOWER CHARGES •During Aidan Kearney interview with Ron, he reveals something that supports "Juror Es" account from July 18th. •While discussing the deliberations regarding count 2, Ron states the following: "The one charge that we were NOT all in agreement on was the one charge, involuntary manslaughter" (VIDEO BELOW) Involuntary manslaughter is one of the "Lesser Charges on count 2" (Juror E) **In a previous interview, Ron makes it clear that he did not reach out to the lawyers. (PICTURE BELOW) meaning Ron & juror E were not the same person. We now have 2 jurors that have made the statement that they were hung on the lesser included charge when it comes to count 2 "OUI Manslaughter" From an interview with Ted Daniels, Alan Jackson seems to agree. (VIDEO BELOW) Karen Read should have been & should still be acquitted on all 3 of the main charges against her. In every other court case in every other courtroom across the country, that's what would have happened. But not in Norfolk County, not against the CW or Massachusetts and certainly not with Judge Cannone.

Joe Flipperhead

59,787 просмотров • 1 год назад

#KarenRead verdict update... The jury asked if finding the defendant "NOT GUILTY" on main charges but hung on lesser charges (like OUI) requires a retrial for all charges. Judge Cannone said she cannot answer hypothetical questions. Why not include a NOT GUILTY box for each charge? The corruption is deep, discussing TRIPLE JEOPARDY in this unique case. #KarenRead #TripleJeopardy

#KarenRead verdict update... The jury asked if finding the defendant "NOT GUILTY" on main charges but hung on lesser charges (like OUI) requires a retrial for all charges. Judge Cannone said she cannot answer hypothetical questions. Why not include a NOT GUILTY box for each charge? The corruption is deep, discussing TRIPLE JEOPARDY in this unique case. #KarenRead #TripleJeopardy

Kingdom Radio

213,816 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."

Eric Daugherty

140,799 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This mother was upset with her kid for leaving his clothes out on the stairs. She said she asked him to take his dirty clothes and put it in the washer machine and to do a load of laundry. She said he got mad and said no and started blaming her. She told him that he needs to come talk to her when he’s calm and not upset and they will discuss it. She said she is leaving his clothes right where they are. Me, personally, uhm- I would handle that in a completely different manner. What about you? Is this how you would handle your children leaving clothes out like that? Would you handle them the way she did if they back-talked you, got mad at you, was upset and blamed you?

This mother was upset with her kid for leaving his clothes out on the stairs. She said she asked him to take his dirty clothes and put it in the washer machine and to do a load of laundry. She said he got mad and said no and started blaming her. She told him that he needs to come talk to her when he’s calm and not upset and they will discuss it. She said she is leaving his clothes right where they are. Me, personally, uhm- I would handle that in a completely different manner. What about you? Is this how you would handle your children leaving clothes out like that? Would you handle them the way she did if they back-talked you, got mad at you, was upset and blamed you?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

42,750 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

John Crotty on Kel'el Ware playing time: "A lot of teams would not treat and do what the Heat are doing Kel'el. They would continue to keep him out on the floor and maybe play him more. I think in some ways he certainly wishes that was the case. I think he's gonna learn a lot quicker the way the Heat are coaching him up and I think we'll see and explosion from him later this year and next year I think you'll see a guy whos just getting it more and more"

John Crotty on Kel'el Ware playing time: "A lot of teams would not treat and do what the Heat are doing Kel'el. They would continue to keep him out on the floor and maybe play him more. I think in some ways he certainly wishes that was the case. I think he's gonna learn a lot quicker the way the Heat are coaching him up and I think we'll see and explosion from him later this year and next year I think you'll see a guy whos just getting it more and more"

Heat Central

77,293 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Diddy likely won't serve a ton of time and conspiracy theories will continue to spread about him but in the end a Jury made this decision outside the influence of the Conspiracy theorists on X. Not Guilty on the most serious charges.

Diddy likely won't serve a ton of time and conspiracy theories will continue to spread about him but in the end a Jury made this decision outside the influence of the Conspiracy theorists on X. Not Guilty on the most serious charges.

Brian Krassenstein

40,417 просмотров • 1 год назад

This man is lucky he was confronted by other Indians. They all stand there ‘talking’ ? Naye - he is shitting himself, but just gets loud to keep them at bay. And they allow it. 😒 one of them should have Fucken punched this Tyma in his Poes. What is the right thing to do in this situation? I think - You keep him there until the police come, and you’re able to establish IS THE WOMAN SAFE or NOT? Cos now, she was taken home and most likely beaten up more 😢

This man is lucky he was confronted by other Indians. They all stand there ‘talking’ ? Naye - he is shitting himself, but just gets loud to keep them at bay. And they allow it. 😒 one of them should have Fucken punched this Tyma in his Poes. What is the right thing to do in this situation? I think - You keep him there until the police come, and you’re able to establish IS THE WOMAN SAFE or NOT? Cos now, she was taken home and most likely beaten up more 😢

Warras

141,318 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

This woman shows up a little later than everyone to the graduation ceremony. Rather that stand out of the way or take a seat way in the back she decodes she is going to stand at the rail in front of everyone and she is not sorry about it. The police were even called and they are not doing anything about it. Why do people think they are better than other people? Why do some act like they have zero respect for others? Would you ever do this? Ever? Do you think the police should have hauled her away?

This woman shows up a little later than everyone to the graduation ceremony. Rather that stand out of the way or take a seat way in the back she decodes she is going to stand at the rail in front of everyone and she is not sorry about it. The police were even called and they are not doing anything about it. Why do people think they are better than other people? Why do some act like they have zero respect for others? Would you ever do this? Ever? Do you think the police should have hauled her away?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

4,439,826 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Just when I think maybe I've become too cynical, along comes a story that proves I'm not cynical enough. 1. Credit to David Shoebridge for pursuing this. That's not something I'm likely to say often, but credit where it's due. 2. Credit to the ABC for giving this story the air time it so richly deserves... again not something I'm known for saying. They took an intellectually disabled kid whose parents asked for help, deliberately radicalised him, and then criminally prosecuted him for being radicalised. The fact that the Australian Federal Police would do this is reprehensible. The fact that they seek to JUSTIFY it is beyond disgusting. The only acceptable outcome from here is for the officers involved and the senior members seeking to justify it MUST receive the maximum penalty that the kid was at risk of. If the kid was at risk of 20 years prison if he'd been found guilty on their trumped up charges, then they should do 20 years. This is a complete betrayal of public trust and only serves to reinforce my view that government will always and forever make everything they 'fix', worse.

Just when I think maybe I've become too cynical, along comes a story that proves I'm not cynical enough. 1. Credit to David Shoebridge for pursuing this. That's not something I'm likely to say often, but credit where it's due. 2. Credit to the ABC for giving this story the air time it so richly deserves... again not something I'm known for saying. They took an intellectually disabled kid whose parents asked for help, deliberately radicalised him, and then criminally prosecuted him for being radicalised. The fact that the Australian Federal Police would do this is reprehensible. The fact that they seek to JUSTIFY it is beyond disgusting. The only acceptable outcome from here is for the officers involved and the senior members seeking to justify it MUST receive the maximum penalty that the kid was at risk of. If the kid was at risk of 20 years prison if he'd been found guilty on their trumped up charges, then they should do 20 years. This is a complete betrayal of public trust and only serves to reinforce my view that government will always and forever make everything they 'fix', worse.

Topher Field

21,284 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

A senior Biden-Harris administration alum just KNEECAPPED Xavier Becerra after the California gubernatorial debate, saying that there is wide Cabinet Secretary-level agreement that he was "not an effective HHS Secretary." Xochitl Hinojosa, a Biden DOJ and DNC alum: "After working in Joe Biden's administration, I do not trust Xavier Becerra [to stand up to Donald Trump]. Hinojosa continues: "When I saw him in the administration and I think a lot of people did and people understand this. It's he was not effective in governing. And I think that a lot of people in the Biden administration are talking about this because they realize that he was not an effective HHS Secretary. And if you ask any cabinet secretary, they would tell you the same thing. And so I think that there is a I think people recognize this and I think this is why Tom Steyer has gone to the top." CNN's Abby Phillip confirms: "This is that's not this is not the first time that I've heard that, right? So what Xochi's talking about is a real thing."

A senior Biden-Harris administration alum just KNEECAPPED Xavier Becerra after the California gubernatorial debate, saying that there is wide Cabinet Secretary-level agreement that he was "not an effective HHS Secretary." Xochitl Hinojosa, a Biden DOJ and DNC alum: "After working in Joe Biden's administration, I do not trust Xavier Becerra [to stand up to Donald Trump]. Hinojosa continues: "When I saw him in the administration and I think a lot of people did and people understand this. It's he was not effective in governing. And I think that a lot of people in the Biden administration are talking about this because they realize that he was not an effective HHS Secretary. And if you ask any cabinet secretary, they would tell you the same thing. And so I think that there is a I think people recognize this and I think this is why Tom Steyer has gone to the top." CNN's Abby Phillip confirms: "This is that's not this is not the first time that I've heard that, right? So what Xochi's talking about is a real thing."

Steve Guest

68,821 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

When I was in school and I did something bad, the one thing that I was afraid of was that others would find out I got caught doing something so stupid. Back when I was a kid, that was the worst thing that could happen, The other kids would clown us and make fun of us until we left school. For me it was the equivalent to the smelly kid or the one who soiled his pants at school, it was that bad. I wasn’t too concerned about my parents because they were busy supporting us, they weren’t home much and during that time they barely spoke English. So if a teacher called my parents, they wouldn’t know what the school staff was saying anyways, my parents would ask me what they wanted and I would just make something up. Regardless of the method, I think we can all agree that behavior like this is getting more and more common and shouldn’t be tolerated. Either way, what would you think is the solution for this? Was the guard crossing the line for tazing him? I think she shouldn’t have done that.

When I was in school and I did something bad, the one thing that I was afraid of was that others would find out I got caught doing something so stupid. Back when I was a kid, that was the worst thing that could happen, The other kids would clown us and make fun of us until we left school. For me it was the equivalent to the smelly kid or the one who soiled his pants at school, it was that bad. I wasn’t too concerned about my parents because they were busy supporting us, they weren’t home much and during that time they barely spoke English. So if a teacher called my parents, they wouldn’t know what the school staff was saying anyways, my parents would ask me what they wanted and I would just make something up. Regardless of the method, I think we can all agree that behavior like this is getting more and more common and shouldn’t be tolerated. Either way, what would you think is the solution for this? Was the guard crossing the line for tazing him? I think she shouldn’t have done that.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

35,260 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

STEVE BANNON: They are scared to death because, I think for the first time, they see that there has been someone that actually made, not just a political difference, but a deep cultural difference. I think that's got 'em scared to death. And I think they feel that if they don't put this down now, that if President Trump and the regulators go after it, and also the free market capitalists, like the affiliate groups start responding to the consumers in their local communities — if they see this happening, they think that's a revolution. They think the barbarians have actually breached the gate. And so that's why they have to put it down.

STEVE BANNON: They are scared to death because, I think for the first time, they see that there has been someone that actually made, not just a political difference, but a deep cultural difference. I think that's got 'em scared to death. And I think they feel that if they don't put this down now, that if President Trump and the regulators go after it, and also the free market capitalists, like the affiliate groups start responding to the consumers in their local communities — if they see this happening, they think that's a revolution. They think the barbarians have actually breached the gate. And so that's why they have to put it down.

Bannon’s WarRoom

37,490 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Devin Nunes explains various charges that are likely to be brought against Comey and company "On Comey, the answer is for this, it's very specific, and it's over whether or not he lied on this one part. The larger part is whether or not you can bring a Grand Conspiracy case. And there's the law, which is, lying to Congress, lying to the FBI, but there's also a term in there called misleading. And what a lot of these guys did is they made up things using intelligence that didn't exist, but acted like they knew something that actually wasn't there, and they lied and misled the American people. And by doing that, all the times they testified before Congress, the Senate, they lied over and over and again with this, oh, we've seen something, we can't tell you about it because it's classified. But what do we now know by everything that's been declassified is, is that they didn't have any intelligence on Russia colluding with Trump. In fact, the only intelligence that they had is that the Russians were very well aware of Clinton's plan. And they actually not only thought Clinton was going to win, but likely preferred that she would win. So going back to the cover up of her missing emails that, by the way, are still missing, they all got involved in this plan. They all got the FBI exercise. They were able to go spy on the Trump campaign. They were able to then get the Mueller witch hunt going, that then led to the Ukraine. Remember, that dies off, then you have the fake whistleblower and the Ukraine impeachment. I mean, that means a whole investigation in and of itself. We now know the latest information that happened on January 6th now with agents that were out there, the pipe bombs, all this other stuff that is, who broke the windows that I asked when I was in Congress, I really wanted to know that. But most importantly, Maria, who's the victim in this? The victim is President Trump and his family. They raided Mar-a-Lago. That's a problem and we need answers to that

Devin Nunes explains various charges that are likely to be brought against Comey and company "On Comey, the answer is for this, it's very specific, and it's over whether or not he lied on this one part. The larger part is whether or not you can bring a Grand Conspiracy case. And there's the law, which is, lying to Congress, lying to the FBI, but there's also a term in there called misleading. And what a lot of these guys did is they made up things using intelligence that didn't exist, but acted like they knew something that actually wasn't there, and they lied and misled the American people. And by doing that, all the times they testified before Congress, the Senate, they lied over and over and again with this, oh, we've seen something, we can't tell you about it because it's classified. But what do we now know by everything that's been declassified is, is that they didn't have any intelligence on Russia colluding with Trump. In fact, the only intelligence that they had is that the Russians were very well aware of Clinton's plan. And they actually not only thought Clinton was going to win, but likely preferred that she would win. So going back to the cover up of her missing emails that, by the way, are still missing, they all got involved in this plan. They all got the FBI exercise. They were able to go spy on the Trump campaign. They were able to then get the Mueller witch hunt going, that then led to the Ukraine. Remember, that dies off, then you have the fake whistleblower and the Ukraine impeachment. I mean, that means a whole investigation in and of itself. We now know the latest information that happened on January 6th now with agents that were out there, the pipe bombs, all this other stuff that is, who broke the windows that I asked when I was in Congress, I really wanted to know that. But most importantly, Maria, who's the victim in this? The victim is President Trump and his family. They raided Mar-a-Lago. That's a problem and we need answers to that

Svetlana Lokhova

25,150 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

236,339 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Now they are towing Nancy Guthrie's car that was in the garage. Likely, they plan to process it. Not trying to be critical, but why only now after 6 days are they getting that vehicle processed? I am glad they found the other camera on the roof but this all seems so delayed. Did they not search the roof in the other 2 searches? I hope that camera ends up being the vital piece of evidence needed to solve this case. Video footage credit: Brian Entin NewsNation

Now they are towing Nancy Guthrie's car that was in the garage. Likely, they plan to process it. Not trying to be critical, but why only now after 6 days are they getting that vehicle processed? I am glad they found the other camera on the roof but this all seems so delayed. Did they not search the roof in the other 2 searches? I hope that camera ends up being the vital piece of evidence needed to solve this case. Video footage credit: Brian Entin NewsNation

Jennifer Coffindaffer

130,662 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Kaine on Comey indictment: "I found it very odd when the AG put a press release saying 'We will follow the facts in this case.' What? Prosecutors follow the facts before they indict. They don't indict and then say, 'Well, let's see what the facts are.' I think she even revealed that this is a weak case."

Kaine on Comey indictment: "I found it very odd when the AG put a press release saying 'We will follow the facts in this case.' What? Prosecutors follow the facts before they indict. They don't indict and then say, 'Well, let's see what the facts are.' I think she even revealed that this is a weak case."

Aaron Rupar

260,438 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege

Brian Harrison

26,944 просмотров • 1 год назад

Klobuchar on Abrego Garcia: "The charges will be dealt with in the justice system. That's how this works. Of course, they should've done that at the get go and not wrongfully deported him, and handled the charges in our country. In the end, to me, this is about the rule of law."

Klobuchar on Abrego Garcia: "The charges will be dealt with in the justice system. That's how this works. Of course, they should've done that at the get go and not wrongfully deported him, and handled the charges in our country. In the end, to me, this is about the rule of law."

Aaron Rupar

70,435 просмотров • 1 год назад

Platner: The national pundits, the political establishment, they keep looking for that one story, that one headline, that one moment in my life that they can define the campaign by. But in trying so hard to understand me, they failed to understand that this is not about me at all. This is a movement about us.

Platner: The national pundits, the political establishment, they keep looking for that one story, that one headline, that one moment in my life that they can define the campaign by. But in trying so hard to understand me, they failed to understand that this is not about me at all. This is a movement about us.

Acyn

317,590 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад