Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

"Let's talk about the Epstein stuff. I thought it got real interesting when Elon put out that tweet. And then all of a sudden, a few weeks later, what I thought was really interesting to watch Trump take over Pam Bondi....When are we going to see the list? I...

ShawnRyan762's profile picture

Shawn Ryan

1,135,056 subscribers

177,929 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Cali Girl
Cali Girl1 год назад

Why would you even ask for his opinion on this shit? You had a chance to hold him accountable for HIS failed policies and governance of CA. Did you? I haven’t read much on that — and I won’t watch your interview of NEWSCUM.

Фото профиля Speaker of Truth
Speaker of Truth1 год назад

Gavin Newsom can’t be trusted and not sure why you have him a platform to lie.

Фото профиля Aeternus Lux
Aeternus Lux1 год назад

@GavinNewsom is the same guy that fucked his best friend’s wife back in 2007, right? Definitely trustworthy guy.

Фото профиля PaleRider
PaleRider1 год назад

I don’t get it. You’re just helping him prep for 2028.

Фото профиля Todd Wellborn
Todd Wellborn1 год назад

Interviewing him hurt your brand. Bringing on known liars won’t gain you more viewers.

Фото профиля Patrick Lillis
Patrick Lillis1 год назад

Shawn, I understand your motivation of hosting Newsom but it felt like he got away with a lot of “spin”. I didn’t understand his point on taxes between CA and TX and FL. It did not make sense. I also couldn’t believe there were no questions on K Bass and lack of permits provided

Фото профиля Gladiator
Gladiator1 год назад

How is Jeffrey Epstein lobbying from the grave?

Фото профиля Mudtech23
Mudtech231 год назад

Can't and dont believe anything people like him say. They lie so blatantly that its impossible to take them seriously when they might not be. That's the price of being a liar, you loos credibility. So he's done in my book, may as well talk to my dog instead.

Фото профиля WORLD FACECARD
WORLD FACECARD1 год назад

Interviewing him hurt your brand. Bringing on known liars won’t gain you more viewers.

Фото профиля Greg
Greg1 год назад

I believe people are finally starting to wake up a bit to how this world is ran by evil. The earth is satans to rule.

Похожие видео

Tucker Carlson shares the unforgettable backstage moment when Charlie Kirk looked him in the eye and told him to “go all the way” with his raw feelings about Iran and Epstein. Charlie knew Tucker’s words would upset his donors, but he gave him the green light to speak freely at his event anyway. “I said [to Charlie] I'm probably not going to talk about that [regarding the Iran conflict]. I’m not going to torture you. I know your donors hate this when I say that. And also, Epstein was in the news, and it was clear to me that, you know, Epstein’s probably not like a Mossad agent or something, but Epstein clearly had contact with Israeli intelligence and American intelligence and French intelligence, but the only one you’re not allowed to talk about is Israeli intelligence. “But it seemed true to me, and I had done some work on that. I knew a bunch of people pretty close to that story. So I thought that. And I said that to Charlie, and I said, but I’m not going to say that because I don’t want to make your donors mad. I know it’s just going to be like an endless flurry of texts telling you to stop or you’re going to lose a bunch of funding. “And he looked at me, I’ll never forget it, and said, ‘Go all the way. Do it. Go all the way.’ I said, man, I. You know, a lot of things I can talk about. I don’t need to talk about that. And he said, ‘Do it.’”
1:54

Tucker Carlson shares the unforgettable backstage moment when Charlie Kirk looked him in the eye and told him to “go all the way” with his raw feelings about Iran and Epstein. Charlie knew Tucker’s words would upset his donors, but he gave him the green light to speak freely at his event anyway. “I said [to Charlie] I'm probably not going to talk about that [regarding the Iran conflict]. I’m not going to torture you. I know your donors hate this when I say that. And also, Epstein was in the news, and it was clear to me that, you know, Epstein’s probably not like a Mossad agent or something, but Epstein clearly had contact with Israeli intelligence and American intelligence and French intelligence, but the only one you’re not allowed to talk about is Israeli intelligence. “But it seemed true to me, and I had done some work on that. I knew a bunch of people pretty close to that story. So I thought that. And I said that to Charlie, and I said, but I’m not going to say that because I don’t want to make your donors mad. I know it’s just going to be like an endless flurry of texts telling you to stop or you’re going to lose a bunch of funding. “And he looked at me, I’ll never forget it, and said, ‘Go all the way. Do it. Go all the way.’ I said, man, I. You know, a lot of things I can talk about. I don’t need to talk about that. And he said, ‘Do it.’”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

171,481 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

This was awesome. I got the opportunity to describe to Rick Rubin how I make Founders podcast: “Steph Curry was asked: What do you think of when you're taking a shot? And he said: Absolutely nothing. I’ve had people ask me how I choose what to highlight. What are you thinking of when you're doing this? And my response is: Nothing. I just read and if something jumps out to me I don't think at all, I just underline it. And then I'll go back through and reread all my highlights. And if that part is still interesting, it was interesting the first time, now it's interesting the second time, it's probably interesting to other people. There's 10 million mes out there. I'm not unique. And there's no way that if I read this line twice and found it interesting that if I read it on a podcast that somebody else is not going to think it's interesting too. If I overthink it or if I think of “oh this person might hear it” or “oh this many people will hear it” that gets in the way. I'm thinking of nothing.”
1:07

This was awesome. I got the opportunity to describe to Rick Rubin how I make Founders podcast: “Steph Curry was asked: What do you think of when you're taking a shot? And he said: Absolutely nothing. I’ve had people ask me how I choose what to highlight. What are you thinking of when you're doing this? And my response is: Nothing. I just read and if something jumps out to me I don't think at all, I just underline it. And then I'll go back through and reread all my highlights. And if that part is still interesting, it was interesting the first time, now it's interesting the second time, it's probably interesting to other people. There's 10 million mes out there. I'm not unique. And there's no way that if I read this line twice and found it interesting that if I read it on a podcast that somebody else is not going to think it's interesting too. If I overthink it or if I think of “oh this person might hear it” or “oh this many people will hear it” that gets in the way. I'm thinking of nothing.”

David Senra

32,924 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

.Tucker Carlson Explains How Watching Trump 'Exploded' His World Views "I'd never thought about it [NATO] in my life. And Trump's like, why are we funding NATO? And I thought that was a really interesting question," said Tucker Carlson. "He'd say something that was truly insane, like, the intelligence agencies are spying on me ... And then you'd find out, like, a year later, actually, the intel agencies were spying on him."
2:58

.Tucker Carlson Explains How Watching Trump 'Exploded' His World Views "I'd never thought about it [NATO] in my life. And Trump's like, why are we funding NATO? And I thought that was a really interesting question," said Tucker Carlson. "He'd say something that was truly insane, like, the intelligence agencies are spying on me ... And then you'd find out, like, a year later, actually, the intel agencies were spying on him."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,729,023 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Trump: “I watched that pass that Messi made, not knowing as much as the people in this room, but I know about sorts and I know a little bit about soccer but I watched Messi, and he was well guarded, right? And all of a sudden he is standing on the right, you understand what I'm talking about? I don't know – I just noticed it. Nobody talked about it, I just noticed it. I said, he is too well guarded by a great player. And then he moved to the right and the other player was just standing there. "And he had plenty of time. He kicked it…. You have a great player in England, who I play golf with, you know that, right?… I think they perhaps made a mistake when they made him a defensive player, what do I know about soccer?…we've got to be a little offensive, right? But no, I'm not going to call it. Look, what do I know about coaching? But that was a little unusual."
1:21

Trump: “I watched that pass that Messi made, not knowing as much as the people in this room, but I know about sorts and I know a little bit about soccer but I watched Messi, and he was well guarded, right? And all of a sudden he is standing on the right, you understand what I'm talking about? I don't know – I just noticed it. Nobody talked about it, I just noticed it. I said, he is too well guarded by a great player. And then he moved to the right and the other player was just standing there. "And he had plenty of time. He kicked it…. You have a great player in England, who I play golf with, you know that, right?… I think they perhaps made a mistake when they made him a defensive player, what do I know about soccer?…we've got to be a little offensive, right? But no, I'm not going to call it. Look, what do I know about coaching? But that was a little unusual."

Republicans against Trump

761,616 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Gina Gershon explains why she didn't like Paul Verhoeven's "Showgirls" (1995) at first, but learnt to appreciate it over the years: "I couldn't watch "Showgirls" (1995) for years 'cause I was like, I was too, a little bit of PTSD, I think, in a very slight way, no disrespect to real PTSD, but I would get very tense and anxious when I thought about certain things and stories, and so I never really watched it again, and I would kind of use the excuse of like, 'Well,' and it was a real excuse, like, 'I can't deal with my accent, 'cause I had to lie about my accent. I thought the movie would be closer to one of [Verhoeven's] Dutch films, which are a little bit seedier, a little bit darker, and I think his American films, now that I've kind of studied it and I've stepped out of it, I mean, they're really interesting comments on America and fascism. Going 30 years later, 25 years later, a friend of mine, a writer friend, she said, 'No, you don't understand how great Showgirls is.' I'm like, 'I guess I really don't,' but when I saw it from afar, not being in it, and all of a sudden I'm like, 'Oh my god.' It was really a comment on ugly America and on capitalism and power struggles and dynamics and all those things. That r*** scene has to be there. It's the grossest thing in there and the powerful men, they're all protected and, you know, so that's why it's exciting when she kicks the guy's a$$. I thought it was gonna be a different movie than it was, but you know what? It's also an interesting lesson in, you know, when you get to the set or any situation really, you know, in your mind, you think what it is, but when you go there and it's not, then you have to assess and... You gotta make it make sense, but then I just changed my approach to the whole character, so that was kind of interesting. It was a good lesson." ("Gina Gershon Says Watching Her Performance in Showgirls Left Her Feeling 'Tense and Anxious': 'Like a Little Bit of PTSD'", Virginia Chamlee, People, 2026) P.S: Happy 64th birthday, Gina Gershon!
1:18

Gina Gershon explains why she didn't like Paul Verhoeven's "Showgirls" (1995) at first, but learnt to appreciate it over the years: "I couldn't watch "Showgirls" (1995) for years 'cause I was like, I was too, a little bit of PTSD, I think, in a very slight way, no disrespect to real PTSD, but I would get very tense and anxious when I thought about certain things and stories, and so I never really watched it again, and I would kind of use the excuse of like, 'Well,' and it was a real excuse, like, 'I can't deal with my accent, 'cause I had to lie about my accent. I thought the movie would be closer to one of [Verhoeven's] Dutch films, which are a little bit seedier, a little bit darker, and I think his American films, now that I've kind of studied it and I've stepped out of it, I mean, they're really interesting comments on America and fascism. Going 30 years later, 25 years later, a friend of mine, a writer friend, she said, 'No, you don't understand how great Showgirls is.' I'm like, 'I guess I really don't,' but when I saw it from afar, not being in it, and all of a sudden I'm like, 'Oh my god.' It was really a comment on ugly America and on capitalism and power struggles and dynamics and all those things. That r*** scene has to be there. It's the grossest thing in there and the powerful men, they're all protected and, you know, so that's why it's exciting when she kicks the guy's a$$. I thought it was gonna be a different movie than it was, but you know what? It's also an interesting lesson in, you know, when you get to the set or any situation really, you know, in your mind, you think what it is, but when you go there and it's not, then you have to assess and... You gotta make it make sense, but then I just changed my approach to the whole character, so that was kind of interesting. It was a good lesson." ("Gina Gershon Says Watching Her Performance in Showgirls Left Her Feeling 'Tense and Anxious': 'Like a Little Bit of PTSD'", Virginia Chamlee, People, 2026) P.S: Happy 64th birthday, Gina Gershon!

DepressedBergman

861,433 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Trump on retrieving enriched uranium in Iran: I don't think it's necessary except from a public relations standpoint. I think it's important for the fake news that we get it. I'm the one that said we are going to get it.
2:30

Trump on retrieving enriched uranium in Iran: I don't think it's necessary except from a public relations standpoint. I think it's important for the fake news that we get it. I'm the one that said we are going to get it.

Acyn

165,837 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Scottie Scheffler says they didn’t find his ball on 17 and he actually asked people to stop searching for it: “The rules official said it landed just barely left of the grandstand thing. I don't know what you call that, like a sponsor area or something. And Teddy had a beat right on where it was coming down. So when we get up there, it's past the fence that marks the TIO, so he said anything that's in there is it part of the TIO. So then we said -- we tried to figure it out. I said, if I find it, does that help me; can I drop it -- since that would be about 50 yards closer to the hole. He said, yes, you can then use that spot, but you might have to go to the other side of the TIO, which I didn't know exactly where that would be, and that's not a great angle coming across there. “So decided to stop the search and go back and drop it doing point-of-entry TIO relief. Actually I did that once this year during the Byron as well. Not something I'm proud of but I was familiar with.” He went on to say: “I stopped them. They had guys pointing from up there, like it landed right here, and I just kind of hauled up there, and I was like, guys, get out of there, stop, do not find the ball. Fortunately it was my security guy that I've had for a few years here. His name is Brucey. And then Woody was up there as well. So both those guys are pretty -- I know them quite well, so when I said, please don't look for the ball, they got out of there.” The Open
1:19

Scottie Scheffler says they didn’t find his ball on 17 and he actually asked people to stop searching for it: “The rules official said it landed just barely left of the grandstand thing. I don't know what you call that, like a sponsor area or something. And Teddy had a beat right on where it was coming down. So when we get up there, it's past the fence that marks the TIO, so he said anything that's in there is it part of the TIO. So then we said -- we tried to figure it out. I said, if I find it, does that help me; can I drop it -- since that would be about 50 yards closer to the hole. He said, yes, you can then use that spot, but you might have to go to the other side of the TIO, which I didn't know exactly where that would be, and that's not a great angle coming across there. “So decided to stop the search and go back and drop it doing point-of-entry TIO relief. Actually I did that once this year during the Byron as well. Not something I'm proud of but I was familiar with.” He went on to say: “I stopped them. They had guys pointing from up there, like it landed right here, and I just kind of hauled up there, and I was like, guys, get out of there, stop, do not find the ball. Fortunately it was my security guy that I've had for a few years here. His name is Brucey. And then Woody was up there as well. So both those guys are pretty -- I know them quite well, so when I said, please don't look for the ball, they got out of there.” The Open

Flushing It

1,774,403 просмотров • 5 дней назад

“Offensively I don't know what to make of them. There are times that over the last month I thought they ran some really good concepts in the pass game. And then this week I didn't see it…” “It was NOT Jalen Hurts’ fault…I thought the concepts did not give him a lot of opportunities.” Greg Cosell discusses the Eagles’ offense:
0:24

“Offensively I don't know what to make of them. There are times that over the last month I thought they ran some really good concepts in the pass game. And then this week I didn't see it…” “It was NOT Jalen Hurts’ fault…I thought the concepts did not give him a lot of opportunities.” Greg Cosell discusses the Eagles’ offense:

Ross Tucker Podcast

100,746 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “Your Director of National Counterterrorism, Joe Kent — he just resigned today. He said he can’t support your conflict with Iran. What’s your reaction to that? And did you —” President Trump: “Well, I read his statement. I always thought it was a nice guy, but I always thought he was weak on security, very weak on security. I didn’t know him well, but I thought he seemed like a pretty nice guy, but when I read a statement, I realized that it’s a good thing that he’s out because he said that Iran was not a threat. Iran was a threat — every country realized what a threat Iran was. The question is whether or not they wanted to do something about it. And many people, many of the greatest military scholars are saying for years that presidents should have taken out Iran because they wanted a nuclear weapon. They were — if we didn’t do the attack or if I’ll go a step further, if I didn’t terminate the Iran nuclear deal given to us, one of the worst deals ever made by Barack Hussein Obama. Remember when they sent Boeing 757 over there loaded with cash, hundreds of millions of dollars? You would have been very happy. This was a wonderful — they sent hundreds of million — people forget that. Does anybody remember, right? You remember! Hundreds of millions of dollars in a Boeing 757. I think they had two of them loaded. They took the seats out and they put cash. And it was so much that there wasn’t a bank in Virginia, Maryland, or DC that had any money left. They stripped them of all their money, put it into planes, sent it to Iran almost as ransom. That’s not going to happen with Trump. And nobody ever did anything about it. Nobody ever said anything. Can you imagine if I did that? So, they’ve been a threat for a long time, but they’ve really been a threat. If — if I didn’t terminate Obama’s horrible deal that he made, the Iran nuclear deal, you would have had a nuclear war four years ago. You would have had — you would have had nuclear holocaust, and you would have had it again if we didn’t bomb the site. So, when somebody is working with us that says they didn’t think Iran was a threat, we don’t want those people because — and there are some people, I guess, that would say that, but they’re not smart people or they’re not savvy people. Iran was a tremendous threat. And virtually every NATO nation — and this is the thing, if they told me it wasn’t a threat and therefore they don’t want to help, but when they say it was a threat and it was a major threat — every one of them — I think every one of them — I don’t know of one that said they’re not a threat, but when they say it was a threat, but we’re not going to help, I think they’re very foolish. You know, it’s interesting. It’s interesting because I could say this, that what’s happening in Ukraine, we’re probably in there for $400 billion. We don’t spend any money anymore. They buy it from us and they pay full price. But Biden gave them between 350 and $400 billion of equipment and cash. Someday, they’ll have to find out about the cash, and you could say that wasn’t a threat. You know, we’re helping them, so we helped them and they didn’t help us. And I think that’s a very bad thing for NATO.”
3:25

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “Your Director of National Counterterrorism, Joe Kent — he just resigned today. He said he can’t support your conflict with Iran. What’s your reaction to that? And did you —” President Trump: “Well, I read his statement. I always thought it was a nice guy, but I always thought he was weak on security, very weak on security. I didn’t know him well, but I thought he seemed like a pretty nice guy, but when I read a statement, I realized that it’s a good thing that he’s out because he said that Iran was not a threat. Iran was a threat — every country realized what a threat Iran was. The question is whether or not they wanted to do something about it. And many people, many of the greatest military scholars are saying for years that presidents should have taken out Iran because they wanted a nuclear weapon. They were — if we didn’t do the attack or if I’ll go a step further, if I didn’t terminate the Iran nuclear deal given to us, one of the worst deals ever made by Barack Hussein Obama. Remember when they sent Boeing 757 over there loaded with cash, hundreds of millions of dollars? You would have been very happy. This was a wonderful — they sent hundreds of million — people forget that. Does anybody remember, right? You remember! Hundreds of millions of dollars in a Boeing 757. I think they had two of them loaded. They took the seats out and they put cash. And it was so much that there wasn’t a bank in Virginia, Maryland, or DC that had any money left. They stripped them of all their money, put it into planes, sent it to Iran almost as ransom. That’s not going to happen with Trump. And nobody ever did anything about it. Nobody ever said anything. Can you imagine if I did that? So, they’ve been a threat for a long time, but they’ve really been a threat. If — if I didn’t terminate Obama’s horrible deal that he made, the Iran nuclear deal, you would have had a nuclear war four years ago. You would have had — you would have had nuclear holocaust, and you would have had it again if we didn’t bomb the site. So, when somebody is working with us that says they didn’t think Iran was a threat, we don’t want those people because — and there are some people, I guess, that would say that, but they’re not smart people or they’re not savvy people. Iran was a tremendous threat. And virtually every NATO nation — and this is the thing, if they told me it wasn’t a threat and therefore they don’t want to help, but when they say it was a threat and it was a major threat — every one of them — I think every one of them — I don’t know of one that said they’re not a threat, but when they say it was a threat, but we’re not going to help, I think they’re very foolish. You know, it’s interesting. It’s interesting because I could say this, that what’s happening in Ukraine, we’re probably in there for $400 billion. We don’t spend any money anymore. They buy it from us and they pay full price. But Biden gave them between 350 and $400 billion of equipment and cash. Someday, they’ll have to find out about the cash, and you could say that wasn’t a threat. You know, we’re helping them, so we helped them and they didn’t help us. And I think that’s a very bad thing for NATO.”

Curtis Houck

12,646 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Caller: "Okay. So, I've been with my wife for, we've been together since we were 14, for 14 years. I'm 32, I met her when I was 19, we had a child at 20. And, um, I've always just kind of been a butthead to her, to be honest. Every now and then I would demean her or make little comments, and I would say it started to really get bad about six weeks ago. Um, we were doing some work in the yard, and I really just blew up on her over the stupidest little thing. And then about a week later, we're just constantly arguing and dividing from each other. And then about a week or two later, she told me that she thought she was falling out of love with me. And it just really crushed me. I never would have thought that those words could come out of her mouth, and she told me that the way I treat her is, I'm not treating her the right way. And I completely owned it. I mean, I said everything you said is absolutely correct. You know, and I said, 'I don't want my son, our son growing up thinking that this is how you're supposed to treat women.' And, I mean, since that day, I have treated her like an angel. I mean, I've done everything and just constantly telling her I love her, giving her hugs, kisses. Um, but that was a Saturday night, and then Monday night she ended up telling me that she was, um, in communication with a guy she met on TikTok. And she told me she broke it off with him, and I asked her, What was the subjects about?' And she said it was just somebody to talk to about what I'm going through, my mental, you know, health. And she said it was never anything flirtatious or anything like that. She said it was just a stranger that I could talk to, but she said, 'I broke it off with him, and I'm gonna focus on us. And I said, 'I'm all in with you, let's rebuild this.' And we went about two weeks and it was just absolute honeymoon phase. I mean, we were just, never it was great. And then I went through her phone two weeks after that and found that she was on Snapchat with the guy. And I confronted her about it, and she said, 'Okay, well, I didn't think you were really gonna change, and I wanted to keep this friendship with the guy.' And she said, 'I'll break it off with him.' And I'm like, 'Okay, I guess I'll give you a second chance. I'm kind of heartbroken again that you would keep this from me. And then about a week and a half later, which was just yesterday, I went through the call logs on which, I feel bad because I'm constantly digging at all this, but every time I dig, I find something. And I confronted her yesterday that she's been talking to this guy for 30, 40, 50 minutes a day, um, the last week and a half, after she told me a third time that she was breaking it off with him. And I'm just super confused. I don't really know how to handle this. Now she's saying that she's all done talking to him, and I'm like, 'Well, how do I trust you now? You've been lying to me for the past three weeks about this.' So, that's really all I got." John Delony: "So for 14 years... you belittled your wife. She got the clear message she was beneath you. You're the smart one, you're the fast one, you're the quick one. You are the provider, you're the all this stuff." Caller: "Mhm. I always thought she was beneath me." John Delony: "Yeah, you did. And she's got that message for, for a decade and a half.
3:33

Caller: "Okay. So, I've been with my wife for, we've been together since we were 14, for 14 years. I'm 32, I met her when I was 19, we had a child at 20. And, um, I've always just kind of been a butthead to her, to be honest. Every now and then I would demean her or make little comments, and I would say it started to really get bad about six weeks ago. Um, we were doing some work in the yard, and I really just blew up on her over the stupidest little thing. And then about a week later, we're just constantly arguing and dividing from each other. And then about a week or two later, she told me that she thought she was falling out of love with me. And it just really crushed me. I never would have thought that those words could come out of her mouth, and she told me that the way I treat her is, I'm not treating her the right way. And I completely owned it. I mean, I said everything you said is absolutely correct. You know, and I said, 'I don't want my son, our son growing up thinking that this is how you're supposed to treat women.' And, I mean, since that day, I have treated her like an angel. I mean, I've done everything and just constantly telling her I love her, giving her hugs, kisses. Um, but that was a Saturday night, and then Monday night she ended up telling me that she was, um, in communication with a guy she met on TikTok. And she told me she broke it off with him, and I asked her, What was the subjects about?' And she said it was just somebody to talk to about what I'm going through, my mental, you know, health. And she said it was never anything flirtatious or anything like that. She said it was just a stranger that I could talk to, but she said, 'I broke it off with him, and I'm gonna focus on us. And I said, 'I'm all in with you, let's rebuild this.' And we went about two weeks and it was just absolute honeymoon phase. I mean, we were just, never it was great. And then I went through her phone two weeks after that and found that she was on Snapchat with the guy. And I confronted her about it, and she said, 'Okay, well, I didn't think you were really gonna change, and I wanted to keep this friendship with the guy.' And she said, 'I'll break it off with him.' And I'm like, 'Okay, I guess I'll give you a second chance. I'm kind of heartbroken again that you would keep this from me. And then about a week and a half later, which was just yesterday, I went through the call logs on which, I feel bad because I'm constantly digging at all this, but every time I dig, I find something. And I confronted her yesterday that she's been talking to this guy for 30, 40, 50 minutes a day, um, the last week and a half, after she told me a third time that she was breaking it off with him. And I'm just super confused. I don't really know how to handle this. Now she's saying that she's all done talking to him, and I'm like, 'Well, how do I trust you now? You've been lying to me for the past three weeks about this.' So, that's really all I got." John Delony: "So for 14 years... you belittled your wife. She got the clear message she was beneath you. You're the smart one, you're the fast one, you're the quick one. You are the provider, you're the all this stuff." Caller: "Mhm. I always thought she was beneath me." John Delony: "Yeah, you did. And she's got that message for, for a decade and a half.

Hecto Crypto | NetLink ⛓

146,895 просмотров • 18 дней назад

''I was there but that was not why I was there. I was there for a summit and when I realised that that it was not a summit and a voice vote was put about the endorsement of the President; I just left. -Senator Ali Ndume on the endorsement of the President by APC governors
2:14

''I was there but that was not why I was there. I was there for a summit and when I realised that that it was not a summit and a voice vote was put about the endorsement of the President; I just left. -Senator Ali Ndume on the endorsement of the President by APC governors

Channels Television

111,109 просмотров • 1 год назад

Watters: They're so much other funny stuff to make fun of the Democrats. Gavin Newsom put his legs behind his head. Did you see that, that photo he put out? Jones: I thought it was fake. Watters: I thought it was real
0:26

Watters: They're so much other funny stuff to make fun of the Democrats. Gavin Newsom put his legs behind his head. Did you see that, that photo he put out? Jones: I thought it was fake. Watters: I thought it was real

Acyn

89,831 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

NEW: 🇺🇸 Rep. Thomas Massie speaks about the moment he realized that Pam Bondi was running a massive cover-up for the clients of Jeffrey Epstein: It all started at a private dinner last year in which Pam Bondi invited Republicans, and Massie was also there. Then Massie asked Pam ‘When could we expect to see the next tranche of these files?’ PAM BONDI: All that was left was CSAM, and it was really disgusting, and nobody wanted to see that kind of stuff. Massie said this was the seed for what later became known as the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
3:12

NEW: 🇺🇸 Rep. Thomas Massie speaks about the moment he realized that Pam Bondi was running a massive cover-up for the clients of Jeffrey Epstein: It all started at a private dinner last year in which Pam Bondi invited Republicans, and Massie was also there. Then Massie asked Pam ‘When could we expect to see the next tranche of these files?’ PAM BONDI: All that was left was CSAM, and it was really disgusting, and nobody wanted to see that kind of stuff. Massie said this was the seed for what later became known as the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Megatron

309,843 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇺🇲🇩🇪🇷🇺 Donald Trump: I heard the head of Germany say: "This is not our war", referring to Iran. I replied: well, Ukraine is not our war either, we're helping, but it's not our war. I thought that was a very inappropriate statement, but he made it, and you can't erase it. He really believed that. And I said: well, you know, Ukraine is not our war, and that's true, but I would like all these young people to stop dying. I mean, they're being killed, it's like a meat grinder, what's happening there is terrible.
0:31

🇺🇲🇩🇪🇷🇺 Donald Trump: I heard the head of Germany say: "This is not our war", referring to Iran. I replied: well, Ukraine is not our war either, we're helping, but it's not our war. I thought that was a very inappropriate statement, but he made it, and you can't erase it. He really believed that. And I said: well, you know, Ukraine is not our war, and that's true, but I would like all these young people to stop dying. I mean, they're being killed, it's like a meat grinder, what's happening there is terrible.

Visioner

36,117 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Former CDC Director dr. Robert Redfield: "I happen to be of the view that I don't think Secretary Kennedy is anti-vaccine. I do believe he's for transparency and honest discussion about what we know about vaccines in terms of their safety and efficacy. And I think some of that has been sort of skirted through over the last couple of years." "I still say what I said when he got confirmed that I think Kennedy has the potential to be the most consequential Secretary of Health that our nation's ever had. That said, I understand a lot of the controversies and a lot of the way people act." "I thought the hearing today was very unfortunate. I think you brought it up. I think there was no real communication in that hearing." "It was people with their own position. Kennedy never really had the opportunity to explain why he thought what he thought. You and I can agree or disagree with what he thinks, but I do think it's important that you can express that."
1:06

Former CDC Director dr. Robert Redfield: "I happen to be of the view that I don't think Secretary Kennedy is anti-vaccine. I do believe he's for transparency and honest discussion about what we know about vaccines in terms of their safety and efficacy. And I think some of that has been sort of skirted through over the last couple of years." "I still say what I said when he got confirmed that I think Kennedy has the potential to be the most consequential Secretary of Health that our nation's ever had. That said, I understand a lot of the controversies and a lot of the way people act." "I thought the hearing today was very unfortunate. I think you brought it up. I think there was no real communication in that hearing." "It was people with their own position. Kennedy never really had the opportunity to explain why he thought what he thought. You and I can agree or disagree with what he thinks, but I do think it's important that you can express that."

Camus

33,374 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”
1:48

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I'm gonna say something a bit different from what that source told the New York Times. He said Fordo was damaged Severely but wasn't destroyed. So I'll tell you what Israel's current assessment is. First off all Natanz was completely wiped out. For Fordo and Isfahan, we're waiting on more confirmations. Not because we think something didn't work, but because it naturally takes longer for those deep underground sites. The big question now is whether Iran's nuke program just went back a few years, or if it's been totally erased. This relates to where the enriched uranium is. That uranium, enriched to 60%, is now incredibly hard for Iran to boost to the 90% needed for a bomb. Israel thinks most, if not all, of the enriched uranium was at Natanz or Isfahan. It wasn't moved, so it was there during the attack. We're now waiting For The BDA Of the Enriched uranium just like we were waiting on Muhammad Sinwar. I know he's under a tunnel and unreachable, but we'll likely know soon if he was also destroyed. This is huge news that could mean the official end of Iran's nuclear program.
1:07

I'm gonna say something a bit different from what that source told the New York Times. He said Fordo was damaged Severely but wasn't destroyed. So I'll tell you what Israel's current assessment is. First off all Natanz was completely wiped out. For Fordo and Isfahan, we're waiting on more confirmations. Not because we think something didn't work, but because it naturally takes longer for those deep underground sites. The big question now is whether Iran's nuke program just went back a few years, or if it's been totally erased. This relates to where the enriched uranium is. That uranium, enriched to 60%, is now incredibly hard for Iran to boost to the 90% needed for a bomb. Israel thinks most, if not all, of the enriched uranium was at Natanz or Isfahan. It wasn't moved, so it was there during the attack. We're now waiting For The BDA Of the Enriched uranium just like we were waiting on Muhammad Sinwar. I know he's under a tunnel and unreachable, but we'll likely know soon if he was also destroyed. This is huge news that could mean the official end of Iran's nuclear program.

Amit Segal

2,394,394 просмотров • 1 год назад